The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

PYD Approach
To Development Into the Third Decade of Life

Patrick Tolan Ph.D.
University of Virginia, Youth-Nex Center
October 23, 2012
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

YOUTH-NEX Mission
• Promote Healthy/Effective Youth
Development
• Enhance Potential of Youth as Healthy
Productive Citizens
• Reduce Developmental Risk
– Through Focused Research, Training
and Service
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Transition to Adult Status & Roles
(Outcomes)
• Key Functional Outcomes (Education,
Marriage, Parenting, Work)
• Key Social Roles (Community Involvement,
Ownership, Conventional Roles)
• Key Self-Definition Changes
• Behavioral Continuity
Horney, J., Tolan, P.H., & Weisburd, D. (in press). Contextual Influences. In R. Loeber
& D. Farrington (Eds.), From Juvenile Delinquency to Adult Crime: Criminal
Careers, Justice Policy and Prevention. Oxford University Press.
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Transition or Further Trajectory?
• Past Predicts But Not Well
• Enter At Different Age With Different Supports,
Possibilities
• Different Opportunities
• For Many Transition is Transitional
• Co-Occurring Development of Family, Friends, Society
All are Same (Transition), All are Similar to a Subgroup
(Variations), All are Unalike (Individual Variations)
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Transition or Further Trajectory?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Genetic/Inherited Propensities
Gene Environment Correlation, Interactions, etc.
Assortative Mating, Luck of the Draw
Access to Social Resources
Exposure to Social Risks
Access to Family and Community Support, Role
Mattering
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Community
Community
Neighborhood
Neighborhood
Family
Family
Child
Child

Multiple Influences
Interacting Over
Development
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Chicago Youth Development Study

Patrick H. Tolan, Deborah Gorman-Smith,
David B. Henry, Michael Schoeny,
Susan Scrimshaw, Co-PI, Ethnography
Funded by NIMH, NSF, NICHD, CDC-P and W.T. Grant Foundation
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

SAMPLE
•

341 African American and Hispanic adolescent males (148 African
American, 193 Latino

•

Recruited from 17 Chicago public schools
•

high poverty, high crime communities

•

Half of the sample were selected because they had already displayed
above average for community (95th% for US) levels of aggression

•

Mean age was 12.31 at the beginning of the study (range 10-15 years),
first 4 waves annual

•

Seven Waves over 17+ years
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

How Adolescent Trajectories Can Relate to
Early Adolescent Functioning
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Delinquency Clusters/Trajectories
Based on 4 annual waves of data from Self-Report of Delinquency
►
►
►
►

Non-offenders: those with no or minimal aggression, but no delinquent
behavior (24.3%).
Chronic-minor offenders: those consistently involved in minor
offenses over each of the four waves (34.4%).
Escalators: those starting delinquent involvement at a later wave and
escalate to serious offending (frequent & violent) (13.5%).
Serious-Chronic: involved in serious and frequent (including violent)
offending at every wave (27.4%).
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Delinquency Trajectories Distribution

Non-Delinquent

Chronic Minor

Escalators

Serious, Chronic, Violent
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Deceased?
10
8

Percent

6
4
2
0
Minimal

Chronic Minor

-2

ns for any comparison

Escalator

Serious, Chronic,
Violent
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

High School Graduate?
100
90
80
Percent

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Minimal

Chronic Minor

χ2(3,N=178)=11.70, p < .01

Escalator

SCV < Others

Serious, Chronic,
Violent
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

In a Stable Relationship?
70
60

Percent

50
40
30
20
10
0
Minimal

Chronic Minor

χ2(3,N=178)=2.35, ns

Escalator

Serious, Chronic,
Violent
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Father by Age 25?
90
80
70
Percent

60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Minimal

Chronic Minor

Escalator

χ2(3,N=178)=2.78, ns, But, Escalators < Others

Serious, Chronic,
Violent
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Employed?
100
90
80
Percent

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Minimal

Chronic Minor

Escalator

Serious, Chronic,
Violent

χ2(3,N=178)=4.41, ns overall But SCV < Minimal & CM
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Self Report Crime (Serousness Weighted Frequency)
3

Average Level

2.5
2

1.5
1

0.5
0

Minimal

Chronic Minor

Escalator

Serious, Chronic,
Violent

F(3,172)=4.66, p < .01 Escalators and SCV > Minimal
and Chronic Minor
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Neighborhood Effects on Trajectory
Relation to Functioning
as Young Adult
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

• Community Structural Characteristics:
characteristics that reflect the economic
and political/civic viability of the
community
• Neighborhood Social Organization:
social processes or organization for
support, regulation, aid
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Effects for Logistic Regression of Neighborhood
Social Organization and Adolescent Trajectories
on Young Adult Functioning
• Community Structural Characteristics is not a main effect
• Neighborhood Social Organization is not main effect in
multivariate prediction model, controlling for Structural
Characteristics
• Primary Finding is interaction of neighborhood with trajectories
for some outcomes
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

1

2

3

4

Non-delinquent (ND)
Chronic Minor (CM)
Serious, Chronic, Violent (SCV)
Escalators (E)

0

Weighted Frequency Level

5

Crimes Committed

-2

-1

0

1

Neighborhood Social Organization (W1-4)

SCV vs ND, B = 0.60, χ2(1, N=208) = 5.24, p < .05

2
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

5
1

2

3

4

Non-delinquent (ND)
Chronic Minor (CM)
Serious, Chronic, Violent (SCV)
Escalators (E)

0

Odds of a Stable Relationship (W7 Report)

Stable Relationship

-2

-1

0

1

2

Neighborhood Social Organization (W1-4)

Slope:

SCV vs ND, B = -0.87, χ2(1, N=208) = 3.80, p < .10
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Simplified Presentation of Trajectories on Crime by Neighborhood
More Criminal

Better
Organization

Intercept: SCV vs ND, B = 0.85, χ2(1, N=208) = 11.29, p < .01
Slope:

SCV vs ND, B = 0.60, χ2(1, N=208) = 5.24, p < .05
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Applying a PYD/Youth as Manager of
Resources Approach
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Moderated Model – Conceptual Diagram

*All moderators inter-correlated (arrows not shown in diagram), Control for ethnicity
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Measures – Outcomes and Stressful Life Events
•

Outcome (Waves 4 and 5 ages 16-19)
•
•
•
•

•

School Attachment
Endorsement of Prosocial/Responsible/Optimism Values
Depressive symptoms
Externalizing behaviors

Stressful Life Events – Average numbers across types (wave 2)
1.
2.
3.
4.

Health-related
Economic-related
Loss
Exposure to crime and violence
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Moderated Model - Results
School
Attachment

Prosocial
Values

CBC
Externalizing

Depression

Age

-0.033*

-0.003

-0.307

-0.068

African American

0.109*

0.045

-2.542

-0.842

Baseline Aggression

-0.004

0.001

0.096

-0.027

Stress
Coping

-0.004
-0.003

-0.007
0.050

1.134*
0.506

0.910*
0.105

Family Functioning

-0.016

0.019

0.184

0.089

Prosocial Activities

0.062*

0.090*

-0.567

-0.367

Stress*Coping

-0.074*

-0.132*

0.572

-0.202*

Stress*Family Functioning

-0.011

-0.023

0.666

0.506

Stress*Activities

0.028

0.049

-0.125

-0.002

Measure
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Effects Moderated by Coping Effectiveness
Coping and School Attachment
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

Effects Moderated by Coping Effectiveness
Coping and Prosocial Values
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

YOUTH-NEX
3 Major Tasks/Areas of Study for PYD
and Youth Development
Conference on PYD & Intervention Evaluation
Youth-Nex Center, University of Virginia
April 2, 2012
The U.Va. Center to Promote Effective Youth Development

To Map Youth Development from
PYD Approach
1. Identify Functional and Process Outcomes (Consensus)
2. Methodology for Multitudinal Programs (Development)
3. Formulate and Test Theories of Transition vs. Subgroup
Variation
a. Dynamic-Systems Theory
b. How Local/Ecological
GOAL: TO PRODUCE YOUTH AS CAPABLE APPROACH
TO DEVELOPMENT INTO THIRD DECADE OF LIFE

Patrick Tolan, Ph.D. - "Positive Youth Development and Physical Health and Well-Being"

  • 1.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development PYD Approach To Development Into the Third Decade of Life Patrick Tolan Ph.D. University of Virginia, Youth-Nex Center October 23, 2012
  • 2.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development YOUTH-NEX Mission • Promote Healthy/Effective Youth Development • Enhance Potential of Youth as Healthy Productive Citizens • Reduce Developmental Risk – Through Focused Research, Training and Service
  • 3.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Transition to Adult Status & Roles (Outcomes) • Key Functional Outcomes (Education, Marriage, Parenting, Work) • Key Social Roles (Community Involvement, Ownership, Conventional Roles) • Key Self-Definition Changes • Behavioral Continuity Horney, J., Tolan, P.H., & Weisburd, D. (in press). Contextual Influences. In R. Loeber & D. Farrington (Eds.), From Juvenile Delinquency to Adult Crime: Criminal Careers, Justice Policy and Prevention. Oxford University Press.
  • 4.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Transition or Further Trajectory? • Past Predicts But Not Well • Enter At Different Age With Different Supports, Possibilities • Different Opportunities • For Many Transition is Transitional • Co-Occurring Development of Family, Friends, Society All are Same (Transition), All are Similar to a Subgroup (Variations), All are Unalike (Individual Variations)
  • 5.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Transition or Further Trajectory? • • • • • • • Genetic/Inherited Propensities Gene Environment Correlation, Interactions, etc. Assortative Mating, Luck of the Draw Access to Social Resources Exposure to Social Risks Access to Family and Community Support, Role Mattering
  • 6.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development
  • 7.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Community Community Neighborhood Neighborhood Family Family Child Child Multiple Influences Interacting Over Development
  • 8.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Chicago Youth Development Study Patrick H. Tolan, Deborah Gorman-Smith, David B. Henry, Michael Schoeny, Susan Scrimshaw, Co-PI, Ethnography Funded by NIMH, NSF, NICHD, CDC-P and W.T. Grant Foundation
  • 9.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development SAMPLE • 341 African American and Hispanic adolescent males (148 African American, 193 Latino • Recruited from 17 Chicago public schools • high poverty, high crime communities • Half of the sample were selected because they had already displayed above average for community (95th% for US) levels of aggression • Mean age was 12.31 at the beginning of the study (range 10-15 years), first 4 waves annual • Seven Waves over 17+ years
  • 10.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development How Adolescent Trajectories Can Relate to Early Adolescent Functioning
  • 11.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Delinquency Clusters/Trajectories Based on 4 annual waves of data from Self-Report of Delinquency ► ► ► ► Non-offenders: those with no or minimal aggression, but no delinquent behavior (24.3%). Chronic-minor offenders: those consistently involved in minor offenses over each of the four waves (34.4%). Escalators: those starting delinquent involvement at a later wave and escalate to serious offending (frequent & violent) (13.5%). Serious-Chronic: involved in serious and frequent (including violent) offending at every wave (27.4%).
  • 12.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Delinquency Trajectories Distribution Non-Delinquent Chronic Minor Escalators Serious, Chronic, Violent
  • 13.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Deceased? 10 8 Percent 6 4 2 0 Minimal Chronic Minor -2 ns for any comparison Escalator Serious, Chronic, Violent
  • 14.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development High School Graduate? 100 90 80 Percent 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Minimal Chronic Minor χ2(3,N=178)=11.70, p < .01 Escalator SCV < Others Serious, Chronic, Violent
  • 15.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development In a Stable Relationship? 70 60 Percent 50 40 30 20 10 0 Minimal Chronic Minor χ2(3,N=178)=2.35, ns Escalator Serious, Chronic, Violent
  • 16.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Father by Age 25? 90 80 70 Percent 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Minimal Chronic Minor Escalator χ2(3,N=178)=2.78, ns, But, Escalators < Others Serious, Chronic, Violent
  • 17.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Employed? 100 90 80 Percent 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Minimal Chronic Minor Escalator Serious, Chronic, Violent χ2(3,N=178)=4.41, ns overall But SCV < Minimal & CM
  • 18.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Self Report Crime (Serousness Weighted Frequency) 3 Average Level 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Minimal Chronic Minor Escalator Serious, Chronic, Violent F(3,172)=4.66, p < .01 Escalators and SCV > Minimal and Chronic Minor
  • 19.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Neighborhood Effects on Trajectory Relation to Functioning as Young Adult
  • 20.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development • Community Structural Characteristics: characteristics that reflect the economic and political/civic viability of the community • Neighborhood Social Organization: social processes or organization for support, regulation, aid
  • 21.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Effects for Logistic Regression of Neighborhood Social Organization and Adolescent Trajectories on Young Adult Functioning • Community Structural Characteristics is not a main effect • Neighborhood Social Organization is not main effect in multivariate prediction model, controlling for Structural Characteristics • Primary Finding is interaction of neighborhood with trajectories for some outcomes
  • 22.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development 1 2 3 4 Non-delinquent (ND) Chronic Minor (CM) Serious, Chronic, Violent (SCV) Escalators (E) 0 Weighted Frequency Level 5 Crimes Committed -2 -1 0 1 Neighborhood Social Organization (W1-4) SCV vs ND, B = 0.60, χ2(1, N=208) = 5.24, p < .05 2
  • 23.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development 5 1 2 3 4 Non-delinquent (ND) Chronic Minor (CM) Serious, Chronic, Violent (SCV) Escalators (E) 0 Odds of a Stable Relationship (W7 Report) Stable Relationship -2 -1 0 1 2 Neighborhood Social Organization (W1-4) Slope: SCV vs ND, B = -0.87, χ2(1, N=208) = 3.80, p < .10
  • 24.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Simplified Presentation of Trajectories on Crime by Neighborhood More Criminal Better Organization Intercept: SCV vs ND, B = 0.85, χ2(1, N=208) = 11.29, p < .01 Slope: SCV vs ND, B = 0.60, χ2(1, N=208) = 5.24, p < .05
  • 25.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Applying a PYD/Youth as Manager of Resources Approach
  • 26.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Moderated Model – Conceptual Diagram *All moderators inter-correlated (arrows not shown in diagram), Control for ethnicity
  • 27.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Measures – Outcomes and Stressful Life Events • Outcome (Waves 4 and 5 ages 16-19) • • • • • School Attachment Endorsement of Prosocial/Responsible/Optimism Values Depressive symptoms Externalizing behaviors Stressful Life Events – Average numbers across types (wave 2) 1. 2. 3. 4. Health-related Economic-related Loss Exposure to crime and violence
  • 28.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Moderated Model - Results School Attachment Prosocial Values CBC Externalizing Depression Age -0.033* -0.003 -0.307 -0.068 African American 0.109* 0.045 -2.542 -0.842 Baseline Aggression -0.004 0.001 0.096 -0.027 Stress Coping -0.004 -0.003 -0.007 0.050 1.134* 0.506 0.910* 0.105 Family Functioning -0.016 0.019 0.184 0.089 Prosocial Activities 0.062* 0.090* -0.567 -0.367 Stress*Coping -0.074* -0.132* 0.572 -0.202* Stress*Family Functioning -0.011 -0.023 0.666 0.506 Stress*Activities 0.028 0.049 -0.125 -0.002 Measure
  • 29.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Effects Moderated by Coping Effectiveness Coping and School Attachment
  • 30.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development Effects Moderated by Coping Effectiveness Coping and Prosocial Values
  • 31.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development YOUTH-NEX 3 Major Tasks/Areas of Study for PYD and Youth Development Conference on PYD & Intervention Evaluation Youth-Nex Center, University of Virginia April 2, 2012
  • 32.
    The U.Va. Centerto Promote Effective Youth Development To Map Youth Development from PYD Approach 1. Identify Functional and Process Outcomes (Consensus) 2. Methodology for Multitudinal Programs (Development) 3. Formulate and Test Theories of Transition vs. Subgroup Variation a. Dynamic-Systems Theory b. How Local/Ecological GOAL: TO PRODUCE YOUTH AS CAPABLE APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT INTO THIRD DECADE OF LIFE