Subject : English for Interpersonal and Interactions III
Lecturer : Mrs. Syifa Fadhilah Hamid, S.Pd.,M.Pd.
Arranged by: Nanda Permatasari
College : Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf Tangerang
Formal English Language vs. Informal English Languagetrinorei22
We all do our research and put an effort in making a clear and an accurate presentation, but I'd be glad if this could help especially for those who are taking major in English and the like. Good luck!
A proper credit would be appreciated.
• Jay-ar A. Padernal, BSEd Major in English, University of Mindanao
Subject : English for Interpersonal and Interactions III
Lecturer : Mrs. Syifa Fadhilah Hamid, S.Pd.,M.Pd.
Arranged by: Nanda Permatasari
College : Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf Tangerang
Formal English Language vs. Informal English Languagetrinorei22
We all do our research and put an effort in making a clear and an accurate presentation, but I'd be glad if this could help especially for those who are taking major in English and the like. Good luck!
A proper credit would be appreciated.
• Jay-ar A. Padernal, BSEd Major in English, University of Mindanao
If anyone is interested in trends in online dating and some fun....very factual do's and don'ts.....I was curious to see what is happening on all those sites out there....So I researched it and...
Props to Calvin Cheng for doing the layout and design. If anyone wants to make things beautiful, let me know and I will connect you with him!
Social media tools such as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter became part of people’s everyday life. Used well, they can add to your learning experience, and make you a better shepherd of your flock in the future. But used poorly, they can cause lasting damage to you and others.
Chapter 10 Interpersonal Relationship Types
This chapter focuses on specific relationship types: (1) friendship, (2) love, (3) family, and (4) workplace relationships. We establish what these are and explore how interpersonal communication within each of these relationships can be made more effective. We’ll also examine the dark side of some relationships in the final section. All of these relationships can be face-to-face or online or, as is most often the case, some combination. Online relationships have been increasing since the first online dating service was established in 1995. According to one survey, 38 percent of those who identified themselves as “single and looking” used an online dating service (Smith & Duggan, 2013). Social networking sites such as Facebook, Google+, Twitter, Instagram, and Pinterest; professional sites such as LinkedIn; and the dating sites such as Match.com, eHarmony, and OKCupid (and the numerous apps for your phone such as Zoosk, PlentyofFish, and HowAboutWe) make it increasingly easy and interesting to meet new friends and potential romantic partners, to keep in touch with family (websites that provide family hubs are increasing in popularity), and to conduct much of the business of work. As you’ve no doubt noticed, each type of relationship has both advantages and disadvantages. Here we need to identify just a few of these. One of the advantages to establishing relationships online (though some may say it’s a disadvantage) is that personality outweighs physical appearance. Online communication reveals people’s inner qualities first. Rapport and mutual self-disclosure become more important than physical attractiveness in promoting intimacy (Cooper & Sportolari, 1997). And contrary to some popular opinion, online relationships rely just as heavily on the ideals of trust, honesty, and commitment as do face-to-face relationships (Whitty & Gavin, 2001). Friendship and romantic interaction on the Internet are a natural boon to shut-ins and extremely shy people, for whom traditional ways of meeting others are often difficult. Computer talk is empowering for those with “physical disabilities or disfigurements,” for whom face-to-face interactions are often superficial and often end with withdrawal (Bull & Rumsey, 1988; Lea & Spears, 1995). By eliminating the physical cues, computer talk equalizes the interaction and doesn’t put the disfigured person, for example, at an immediate disadvantage in a society where physical attractiveness is so highly valued. Online you’re free to reveal as much or as little about your physical self as you wish, when you wish. Another obvious advantage of online relationships is that the number of people you can reach is so vast that it’s relatively easy to find someone who matches what you’re looking for. The situation is like finding a book that covers just what you need from a library of millions of volumes rather than from a collection of only several hundred or even thousands. In a ...
10 Simple Ways to Improve Your Networkingnextsociety
Networking is fundamental to how I run my business and how I create relationships. I love Networking because it has given me so many amazing opportunities and experiences in my life and I have met some incredibly inspiring and nurturing individuals with the advent of social media. I learn something each day with every connection.
This presentation was created specifically for people who have only put their foot in the water when it comes to using social media as a part of their job search strategy. It encourages them to become visible so they can get noticed and get hired.
This presentation was created for individuals who are interested in learning how to begin leveraging social media to enhance their network and job search effectiveness.
This presentation was delivered on September 26 to the Mills Community Support lunch and learn event in Almonte, Ontario, and then a slightly revised version was presented the following day at the Community Integration Network conference in Toronto.
CONNECT: Facebook for community coalitions is a presentation geared to help community prevention coalitions get up and running with facebook, and learn how to best use the tool to share their message and connect with their community.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
8. THINGS TO KEEP IN MIND ERASE ALL ASSUMPTIONS ASK QUESTIONS MAKE OBSERVATIONS DEVELOP A HYPOTHESIS TEST HYPOTHESIS REVALUATE YOUR HYPOTHESIS ITERATE CONCLUSION. BUILD YOUR MODEL
9. HOW DID I MEET MY FRIENDS. HOW DID YOU MEET YOUR FRIENDS? RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU IT WAS SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY, WORK, SOME SORT OF CLUB/TEAM, LIVED TOGETHER OBSERVATION: REPETITIVE EXPOSURE WERE YOU LOOKING FOR FRIENDS WHEN YOU MET THESE PEOPLE? RESPONSE IS USUALLY A MIXTURE OF NO’s AND YES’s OBSERVATION: MOTIVATION TO MEET FRIENDS IS NOT REQUIRED IN ORDER TO MEET FRIENDS DID YOU MEET MOST OF YOUR FRIENDS ONLINE? FOR THE MOST PART. NO OBSERVATION MOST PEOPLE DON’T MAKE FRIENDS THROUGH THE INTERNET
10. IS TRUST A BIG ISSUE WHEN TRYING TO MAKE FRIENDS ONLINE? IN WHAT SITUATIONS HAVE YOU MADE FRIENDS WITH SOMEONE ONLINE? WHAT MADE YOU TRUST THIS PERSON YOU MET ONLINE? DID APPEARANCE MATTER? DID YOU MAKE FRIENDS BECAUSE YOU HAD SOMETHING IN COMMON THAT YOU COULD IDENTIFY IMMEDIATELY? DID YOU ONLY FIND OUT THAT YOU HAD THINGS IN COMMON AFTER YOU BECAME FRIENDS?
11. REPETITIVE EXPOSURE IS A FACTOR THAT CONTRIBUTES TO FRIEND FORMATION SOME KIND OF IDENTIFYING COMMON FACTOR IS REQUIRED BEFORE FRIENDSHIPS CAN BE FORMED MUST BE OPEN TO MAKING FRIENDS. PEOPLE GO ONLINE TO MAKE FRIENDS WHEN THEY DON’T HAVE MANY FRIENDS IN REAL LIFE.
12. a) PRIMARY FACTOR IS REPETITIVE EXPOSURE b) NO MOTIVATION REQUIRED c) FRIENDSHIPS ARE NOT USUALLY FORMED ONLINE d) COMMONALITIES HAVE LITTLE TO NO IMPACT e) APPEARANCE DOES NOT MATTER
14. WHERE DID YOU MEET YOUR CURRENT ROMANTIC INTEREST? BAR, SCHOOL/UNI, EVENTS OBSERVATION: MANY DIFFERENT PLACES WERE YOU LOOKING FOR ROMANCE WHEN YOU MET THIS PERSON? RESPONSE IS USUALLY A MIXTURE OF NO’s AND YES’s OBSERVATION: MOTIVATION TO MEET A ROMANTIC INTEREST IS NOT REQUIRED DID YOU MEET YOUR SIGNIFICANT OTHER ONLINE? FOR THE MOST PART. NO OBSERVATION MOST PEOPLE DON’T MEET PEOPLE THROUGH THE INTERNET
15. IS TRUST A BIG ISSUE WHEN TRYING TO FIND ROMANCE ONLINE? IN WHAT SITUATIONS HAVE YOU ENGAGED IN A DATE WITH SOMEONE ONLINE? WHAT MADE YOU TRUST THIS PERSON YOU MET ONLINE? DID/DOES APPEARANCE MATTER? DID YOU MAKE FRIENDS BECAUSE YOU HAD SOMETHING IN COMMON THAT YOU COULD IDENTIFY IMMEDIATELY? DID YOU ONLY FIND OUT THAT YOU HAD THINGS IN COMMON AFTER YOU BECAME FRIENDS? DO YOU NEED AN OPENING FOR CONVERSATION TO INITIATE CONVERSATION WITH SOMEONE YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN?
16. YOU MUST LIKE THE APPEARANCE SOME KIND OF OPENING MUST BE THERE IN ORDER TO INITIATE CONVERSATION MUST BE MOTIVATED TO MEET A SIGNIFICANT OTHER. PEOPLE GO ONLINE TO FIND A SIGNIFICANT OTHER WHEN THEY CAN’T FIND ONE THROUGH REAL LIFE.
17. a) CONTEXT IS RIGHT b) MOTIVATION IS REQUIRED BY AT LEAST ONE PERSON 1) SOME SORT OF SENSE OF SECURITY/ TRUST SHOULD BE THERE 2) OPENING TO TALK: SOMETHING HIGHLY RELEVANT TO SAY, OR SOMETHING IN COMMON TO TALK ABOUT c) ROMANCE IS NOT USUALLY FOUND ONLINE d) COMMONALITIES IS NECESSARY TO GET STARTED 3) HELPS IF YOU HAVE MULTIPLE EXPOSURE e) APPEARANCE DOES MATTER
18. c) ROMANCE IS NOT USUALLY FOUND ONLINE c) FRIENDSHIP IS NOT USUALLY FOUND ONLINE
19.
20. WOULD YOU USE THE INTERNET TO MEET PEOPLE IF YOU COULDN’T EASILY MEET PEOPLE IN REAL LIFE? YES ACCESSIBILITY SEEMS TO BE A FACTOR IS TRUST AN ISSUE FOR YOU WHEN MEETING PEOPLE ONLINE? YES TRUST PLAYS A LARGE ROLE IS IT AN ADVANTAGE TO KNOW ABOUT COMMONALITIES AND COMPATIBILITIES AHEAD OF TIME YES, BUT SOMETIMES RUINS THE MYSTERY THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME ADVANTAGES TO ONLINE DATING
21. IS THE STIGMA SURROUNDING ONLINE DATING POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE? DOES IT AFFECT WHETHER YOU GO ONLINE FOR THAT PURPOSE? DO YOU GO ONLINE TO FIND SOMEONE TO HAVE SEX? DO YOU BELIEVE MATCHING ALGORITHMS WORK? DID/DOES APPEARANCE MATTER? DO YOU MEET PEOPLE ONLINE WITHOUT INTENTIONALLY LOOKING? DO YOU WANT THE ABILITY TO DATE SOMEONE ONLINE FIRST BEFORE DATING OFFLINE? DO YOU FIND INITIALLY MESSAGING SOMEONE DIFFICULT? DO YOU WANT TO BE APPROACHED ONLINE OR VICE-VERSA?
22. SOCIAL STIGMA TRUST OF ONLINE IDENTITY ACCESSIBILITY. DIFFICULTY OF MESSAGING SOMEONE DOESN’T KNOW IF IT WORKS
23. a) TRUST c) ACCESSIBLITY b) STIGMA e) DIFFICULTY OF MESSAGING SOMEONE f) Uniqueness to physical interaction
24. a) TRUST a) PRIMARY FACTOR IS REPETITIVE EXPOSURE a) CONTEXT IS RIGHT b) MOTIVATION IS REQUIRED BY AT LEAST ONE PERSON c) ACCESSIBLITY e) APPEARANCE DOES MATTER b) NO MOTIVATION REQUIRED b) STIGMA e) DIFFICULTY OF MESSAGING SOMEONE d) COMMONALITIES IS NECESSARY e) APPEARANCE DOES NOT MATTER c) ROMANCE IS NOT USUALLY FOUND ONLINE d) COMMONALITIES HAVE LITTLE TO NO IMPACT c) FRIENDSHIPS ARE NOT USUALLY FORMED ONLINE
25. INTERNET EASILY MESSAGE SOMEONE NO STIGMA CONTEXT ACCESSIBILITY SECURITY REPETITVE EXPOSURE Commonalities TRUST LOVE FRIENDS APPEARANCE MOTIVATION REALITY MEETING PEOPLE MOTIVATION FRIENDS LOVE CONTEXT REPETITVE EXPOSURE SECURITY APPEARANCE Multiple Exposure Commonalities Opening to talk
26. INTERNET TRUST REALITY NOT ACCESSIBLE/ INTERNET IS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE ACCESSIBLE FRIENDS LOVE LITTLE STIGMA EASILY MESSAGE SOMONE REALITY NOTE: LOVE MET ONLINE WILL TRANSLATE BACK TO OFFLINE Uniqueness to physical interaction <-Must be able to emulate on the internet in order to maintain a romantic relationship online. FRIENDS LOVE
27. HOW TO CONVERT OFFLINE TO ONLINE? Identity Verification: Email, Cellphone, Payment, Rfid? Privacy/Trust. TRUST Website Legitimacy: Reputation, Testaments TIME: e.g MMORPG STIGMA Time, Reputation, Education EASILY MESSAGE SOMONE Message Template, Wingman/Friend Simulation Friendly Site, Free, Known. ACCESSIBILITY Make Real Life Inaccessible
28. CONCLUSIONS/ POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS FRIENDS REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF UNIQUE INTERACTIONS AND INCREASE COMMON INTERACTIONS. E.g. smaller subset of universes. Put people on teams. Elections has the right idea VISIBLE COMMONALITIES. IDENTITY VERIFICATION. RIGHT CONTEXT. LOVE