Student research eds ugm melbourne presentation (public edit)Miranda Hunt
Student researchers presented research on user experiences and behaviors. Primary research methods discussed included contextual inquiry, surveys, interviews, usability testing, video diaries, and card sorting. Research on college students found they begin with "presearch" on Google and Wikipedia to scope their topic before doing "serious research". Student research occurs in "microbursts" with periods of dormancy. Many students are novice researchers who find library websites challenging and don't understand terms like "Boolean". Top search terms were often broad, misspelled, and focused on results on the first page.
World Conference on Online Learning | Doctoral SymposiumKaren Buckley
Doctoral Symposium WCOL "To Read or Not to Read"
Karen Buckley, Academic Developer
Sunday 3rd November 2019
Dublin City University, St. Patrick's Campus
The survey data from 6 years of university library surveys found that the library is heavily used as a place and content provider, but that the value of these roles is diverging. While some services are strained, user discomfort is on the rise. Digging deeper showed interesting variations between colleges in how the library is used that could help assess current services and develop new ones. The survey was limited in scope but provides a starting point to discuss next steps and priorities.
NISO Virtual Conference: Expanding the Assessment Toolbox: Blending the Old and New Assessment Practices
‘Good Enough’: Applying a Holistic Approach for Practical, Systematic Collection Assessment
Madeline Kelly, Head of Collection Development, University Libraries, George Mason University
These were slides I was not able to use during the lecture I gave for the weekend POGS research workshop because of a mix up in assigned topics. Nevertheless, I think OBGYN residents may find these slides useful in crafting their research proposals.
This document discusses bibliometrics training sessions provided by the author for researchers at Cardiff University. It covers why the sessions were introduced due to interest in bibliometric data from the Research Excellence Framework and funders. The sessions explain sources of bibliometric data, increasing citations, and open access publishing. The format includes talks and workbooks. Various university groups and schools have requested sessions. Lessons learned include reducing detail, staying up to date, emphasizing benefits for researchers, and being flexible. Common questions from researchers relate to citation indexes, open access publishing, and interpreting bibliometric data. Next steps include continuing sessions, collecting feedback, and responding to increased interest in bibliometrics and open access publishing.
NISO Virtual Conference: Expanding the Assessment Toolbox: Blending the Old and New Assessment Practices
Assessing Game-Based Library Initiatives
Kyle Felker, Digital Initiatives Librarian, Grand Valley State University Libraries
Presentation for the Center for Teaching Excellence at Lansing Community College to share results from my sabbatical project, as well as practical applications for developing research assignments. Thanks to Maricopa Community College for sharing an <a>assignment planning checklist and sample assignment</a> that I adapted and used in the workshop.
Student research eds ugm melbourne presentation (public edit)Miranda Hunt
Student researchers presented research on user experiences and behaviors. Primary research methods discussed included contextual inquiry, surveys, interviews, usability testing, video diaries, and card sorting. Research on college students found they begin with "presearch" on Google and Wikipedia to scope their topic before doing "serious research". Student research occurs in "microbursts" with periods of dormancy. Many students are novice researchers who find library websites challenging and don't understand terms like "Boolean". Top search terms were often broad, misspelled, and focused on results on the first page.
World Conference on Online Learning | Doctoral SymposiumKaren Buckley
Doctoral Symposium WCOL "To Read or Not to Read"
Karen Buckley, Academic Developer
Sunday 3rd November 2019
Dublin City University, St. Patrick's Campus
The survey data from 6 years of university library surveys found that the library is heavily used as a place and content provider, but that the value of these roles is diverging. While some services are strained, user discomfort is on the rise. Digging deeper showed interesting variations between colleges in how the library is used that could help assess current services and develop new ones. The survey was limited in scope but provides a starting point to discuss next steps and priorities.
NISO Virtual Conference: Expanding the Assessment Toolbox: Blending the Old and New Assessment Practices
‘Good Enough’: Applying a Holistic Approach for Practical, Systematic Collection Assessment
Madeline Kelly, Head of Collection Development, University Libraries, George Mason University
These were slides I was not able to use during the lecture I gave for the weekend POGS research workshop because of a mix up in assigned topics. Nevertheless, I think OBGYN residents may find these slides useful in crafting their research proposals.
This document discusses bibliometrics training sessions provided by the author for researchers at Cardiff University. It covers why the sessions were introduced due to interest in bibliometric data from the Research Excellence Framework and funders. The sessions explain sources of bibliometric data, increasing citations, and open access publishing. The format includes talks and workbooks. Various university groups and schools have requested sessions. Lessons learned include reducing detail, staying up to date, emphasizing benefits for researchers, and being flexible. Common questions from researchers relate to citation indexes, open access publishing, and interpreting bibliometric data. Next steps include continuing sessions, collecting feedback, and responding to increased interest in bibliometrics and open access publishing.
NISO Virtual Conference: Expanding the Assessment Toolbox: Blending the Old and New Assessment Practices
Assessing Game-Based Library Initiatives
Kyle Felker, Digital Initiatives Librarian, Grand Valley State University Libraries
Presentation for the Center for Teaching Excellence at Lansing Community College to share results from my sabbatical project, as well as practical applications for developing research assignments. Thanks to Maricopa Community College for sharing an <a>assignment planning checklist and sample assignment</a> that I adapted and used in the workshop.
Evaluation report is the most important part of an evaluation project. Learn the various aspects that need to be included in an evaluation report. Check out our course on program evaluation by clicking into this link - https://www.udemy.com/course/program-evaluation-for-beginners/?referralCode=C8A8FB44E3313F7F3CF0
Cst analysis overview sdusd princ 11-16-10cesperez1
The document introduces a multi-step process for teachers to better understand academic standards. The process involves analyzing released items from state standardized tests and local benchmark assessments, identifying student strengths and weaknesses, and examining student work. Breakout groups were given examples to analyze items, assess student performance data, compare item rigor, and determine next steps for instruction. The goal is to help teachers unpack standards through the lens of assessment and apply insights to guide student learning.
This document provides guidance on preparing and publishing academic papers in journals. It discusses best practices for each section of a paper from the title page to conclusions. It also covers the peer review process and strategies for revising papers based on reviewer feedback. Additionally, it examines debates around measuring the impact and quality of academic research, journals, and institutions. Metrics discussed include journal rankings, citation counts, the H-index, and holistic approaches that consider impact on knowledge, teaching, practice, policy, the economy, and society. The document aims to help authors navigate the publishing process and issues relating to research assessment.
This document discusses skills related to inquiry and evidence that effective education leaders use and that EdD candidates need. It notes that leaders request and use data from others rather than conducting their own research. EdD programs generally require a dissertation involving empirical research. The document proposes a three-course sequence at the University of Colorado Denver to teach necessary inquiry skills, covering conceiving studies, data collection, and analysis. This is intended to balance preparing students for leadership and completing a dissertation capstone project.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
This document outlines how to write an effective research proposal in six sections. It discusses determining the right research questions, developing a working hypothesis, finding and engaging relevant sources, planning an argument around answering reader's questions, and creating a proposal that meets reader needs. The goal is to move from topic to question to hypothesis, find useful sources, engage sources to build an argument, and plan a proposal that gains approval.
How to undertake a literature search for a dissertationEssayAcademy
Here you will find useful recommendations as for choosing proper source of Literature for your Dissertation. You can also read some additional information in this article https://essay-academy.com/account/blog/how-to-undertake-a-literature-search-for-a-dissertation
This document is an assessment of a management report submitted by Nikolina Taylor titled "Recording Disciplinary and Grievance in ESR". The report received an overall grade of Merit. It clearly addressed the problem and objectives. Primary research included questionnaires distributed to staff with a 64% response rate and interviews. Secondary research reviewed procedures, textbooks, and articles. An excellent analysis was provided of primary data and issues surrounding disciplinary and grievance were identified. The conclusions logically followed from the information and addressed key issues. Recommendations were practical but could have further identified potential difficulties and resolutions.
1. Writing should be a regular part of the research process in order to produce scholarly works through practice.
2. It is important to prioritize research and writing activities, and write in a structured way by breaking projects into manageable chunks and setting deadlines.
3. Sharing writing with others through writing groups or triads and seeking feedback is helpful for improving writing skills and advancing research ideas.
The document summarizes a study on supporting engineering students in developing skills for communicating research plans. It discusses how earlier studies found students needed help with referencing, writing, and using library databases. The intervention provided students with an online resource to help narrow topics, embedded library and writing workshops, and peer review circles. Assessment results showed students significantly improved their research proposals after participating in the scaffolded academic skills program with support from the library, language, and academic specialists.
Doctoral Review of Literature Correspondence to Methodology: A general discus...DoctoralNet Limited
Part of the free ongoing series of conferences from DoctoralNet professors on Saturdays and Sundays, this set of slides covers the topic most likely to cause a person trouble at the proposal defense: the need for 1:1 correspondence between the review of literature and methodology.
NISO Virtual Conference: Expanding the Assessment Toolbox: Blending the Old and New Assessment Practices
Keynote Address: The Value of Library-Provided Content: Assessing Usage and Demonstrating Impact
Megan Oakleaf, Associate Professor of Library and Information Science, iSchool at Syracuse University
This document defines literature review and outlines its importance and purpose. A literature review aims to critically review knowledge on a research topic. It provides a guide for professionals to stay up-to-date in their field. Literature reviews help identify research problems, gaps in knowledge, and inform the methodology. Sources include primary research articles and secondary sources that summarize others' findings. The document describes the steps of literature review including searching databases and other sources, analyzing sources, and writing an introduction, body, and conclusion. It also outlines strategies like using references and searching forward and backward to identify relevant literature.
The document provides feedback on a draft summary report for research evaluation methodology in the Czech Republic. It covers many topics and opinions are divided on several issues. Some view the reports as well-written and justified while others see them as too general. There is contrasting feedback on topics like self-assessment, treatment of PhD students and temporary workers, and assessment of research environment. The document also notes a few incorrect statements in the draft report and provides counterpoints on issues like applied research outputs and dividing duties between teaching and research. It advocates for a learning process to begin in applying the new methodology.
This document provides an overview of resources for finding journal articles, including library databases like Education Research Complete and ERIC, as well as Google Scholar. Tips are given for effective searching, such as using subject headings, keywords and synonyms. It also lists additional help options like the Graduate Education Research Guide, Sakai resource page, library help desk, and contacting the liaison librarian.
This presentation is intended to novice researchers who are not sure about what they want to research on but want to write a good paper as soon as possible! I used it to insinuate my collleagues into research by making them believe it is very easy!
Bridging The Research-Practice Gap Through Evidence-Based Management And Systematic Review.
David Denyer and Rob Briner
Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia
This document discusses different types of literature reviews and how they are used in the research process. It outlines preliminary reviews done early in the research process to scope out what is known, as well as reviews done to develop specific research projects by identifying gaps and developing tools. More formal types of reviews discussed include systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and rapid realist reviews. Several resources for conducting different types of reviews are provided, including the Cochrane Collaboration, EPPI-Centre, and Prospero. Rapid realist reviews are outlined as having 10 specific steps. The document closes by considering the needs of librarians from researchers and ways researchers can improve.
Presentation to Brighton and Sussex NHS Library and Knowledge Service Journal Club on Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian
co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general
internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):617-26.
The document outlines steps for building a research team at the University of Zawia in Libya. It discusses analyzing university rankings methodologies, forming a research group, and conducting a literature review. The research group aims to improve skills, increase publications, solve industry problems, and enhance the university's ranking. A plan is proposed which includes good management, continuous professional development, links to other groups, and a list of activities. The goal is to effectively contribute to higher education through improved research.
This document discusses different types of research design, including exploratory, descriptive, and causal research. It focuses on exploratory research, describing its characteristics as flexible, low-cost, and useful for gaining insights and generating hypotheses. Exploratory research methods mentioned include literature reviews, experience surveys, focus groups, and case analyses. Literature reviews are described as comprehensive surveys of previous research that provide background, identify research gaps, and analyze published work. The document provides steps for conducting a literature review and emphasizes organizing findings thematically to identify trends, debates, and gaps.
Evaluation report is the most important part of an evaluation project. Learn the various aspects that need to be included in an evaluation report. Check out our course on program evaluation by clicking into this link - https://www.udemy.com/course/program-evaluation-for-beginners/?referralCode=C8A8FB44E3313F7F3CF0
Cst analysis overview sdusd princ 11-16-10cesperez1
The document introduces a multi-step process for teachers to better understand academic standards. The process involves analyzing released items from state standardized tests and local benchmark assessments, identifying student strengths and weaknesses, and examining student work. Breakout groups were given examples to analyze items, assess student performance data, compare item rigor, and determine next steps for instruction. The goal is to help teachers unpack standards through the lens of assessment and apply insights to guide student learning.
This document provides guidance on preparing and publishing academic papers in journals. It discusses best practices for each section of a paper from the title page to conclusions. It also covers the peer review process and strategies for revising papers based on reviewer feedback. Additionally, it examines debates around measuring the impact and quality of academic research, journals, and institutions. Metrics discussed include journal rankings, citation counts, the H-index, and holistic approaches that consider impact on knowledge, teaching, practice, policy, the economy, and society. The document aims to help authors navigate the publishing process and issues relating to research assessment.
This document discusses skills related to inquiry and evidence that effective education leaders use and that EdD candidates need. It notes that leaders request and use data from others rather than conducting their own research. EdD programs generally require a dissertation involving empirical research. The document proposes a three-course sequence at the University of Colorado Denver to teach necessary inquiry skills, covering conceiving studies, data collection, and analysis. This is intended to balance preparing students for leadership and completing a dissertation capstone project.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
This document outlines how to write an effective research proposal in six sections. It discusses determining the right research questions, developing a working hypothesis, finding and engaging relevant sources, planning an argument around answering reader's questions, and creating a proposal that meets reader needs. The goal is to move from topic to question to hypothesis, find useful sources, engage sources to build an argument, and plan a proposal that gains approval.
How to undertake a literature search for a dissertationEssayAcademy
Here you will find useful recommendations as for choosing proper source of Literature for your Dissertation. You can also read some additional information in this article https://essay-academy.com/account/blog/how-to-undertake-a-literature-search-for-a-dissertation
This document is an assessment of a management report submitted by Nikolina Taylor titled "Recording Disciplinary and Grievance in ESR". The report received an overall grade of Merit. It clearly addressed the problem and objectives. Primary research included questionnaires distributed to staff with a 64% response rate and interviews. Secondary research reviewed procedures, textbooks, and articles. An excellent analysis was provided of primary data and issues surrounding disciplinary and grievance were identified. The conclusions logically followed from the information and addressed key issues. Recommendations were practical but could have further identified potential difficulties and resolutions.
1. Writing should be a regular part of the research process in order to produce scholarly works through practice.
2. It is important to prioritize research and writing activities, and write in a structured way by breaking projects into manageable chunks and setting deadlines.
3. Sharing writing with others through writing groups or triads and seeking feedback is helpful for improving writing skills and advancing research ideas.
The document summarizes a study on supporting engineering students in developing skills for communicating research plans. It discusses how earlier studies found students needed help with referencing, writing, and using library databases. The intervention provided students with an online resource to help narrow topics, embedded library and writing workshops, and peer review circles. Assessment results showed students significantly improved their research proposals after participating in the scaffolded academic skills program with support from the library, language, and academic specialists.
Doctoral Review of Literature Correspondence to Methodology: A general discus...DoctoralNet Limited
Part of the free ongoing series of conferences from DoctoralNet professors on Saturdays and Sundays, this set of slides covers the topic most likely to cause a person trouble at the proposal defense: the need for 1:1 correspondence between the review of literature and methodology.
NISO Virtual Conference: Expanding the Assessment Toolbox: Blending the Old and New Assessment Practices
Keynote Address: The Value of Library-Provided Content: Assessing Usage and Demonstrating Impact
Megan Oakleaf, Associate Professor of Library and Information Science, iSchool at Syracuse University
This document defines literature review and outlines its importance and purpose. A literature review aims to critically review knowledge on a research topic. It provides a guide for professionals to stay up-to-date in their field. Literature reviews help identify research problems, gaps in knowledge, and inform the methodology. Sources include primary research articles and secondary sources that summarize others' findings. The document describes the steps of literature review including searching databases and other sources, analyzing sources, and writing an introduction, body, and conclusion. It also outlines strategies like using references and searching forward and backward to identify relevant literature.
The document provides feedback on a draft summary report for research evaluation methodology in the Czech Republic. It covers many topics and opinions are divided on several issues. Some view the reports as well-written and justified while others see them as too general. There is contrasting feedback on topics like self-assessment, treatment of PhD students and temporary workers, and assessment of research environment. The document also notes a few incorrect statements in the draft report and provides counterpoints on issues like applied research outputs and dividing duties between teaching and research. It advocates for a learning process to begin in applying the new methodology.
This document provides an overview of resources for finding journal articles, including library databases like Education Research Complete and ERIC, as well as Google Scholar. Tips are given for effective searching, such as using subject headings, keywords and synonyms. It also lists additional help options like the Graduate Education Research Guide, Sakai resource page, library help desk, and contacting the liaison librarian.
This presentation is intended to novice researchers who are not sure about what they want to research on but want to write a good paper as soon as possible! I used it to insinuate my collleagues into research by making them believe it is very easy!
Bridging The Research-Practice Gap Through Evidence-Based Management And Systematic Review.
David Denyer and Rob Briner
Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia
This document discusses different types of literature reviews and how they are used in the research process. It outlines preliminary reviews done early in the research process to scope out what is known, as well as reviews done to develop specific research projects by identifying gaps and developing tools. More formal types of reviews discussed include systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and rapid realist reviews. Several resources for conducting different types of reviews are provided, including the Cochrane Collaboration, EPPI-Centre, and Prospero. Rapid realist reviews are outlined as having 10 specific steps. The document closes by considering the needs of librarians from researchers and ways researchers can improve.
Presentation to Brighton and Sussex NHS Library and Knowledge Service Journal Club on Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian
co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general
internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):617-26.
The document outlines steps for building a research team at the University of Zawia in Libya. It discusses analyzing university rankings methodologies, forming a research group, and conducting a literature review. The research group aims to improve skills, increase publications, solve industry problems, and enhance the university's ranking. A plan is proposed which includes good management, continuous professional development, links to other groups, and a list of activities. The goal is to effectively contribute to higher education through improved research.
This document discusses different types of research design, including exploratory, descriptive, and causal research. It focuses on exploratory research, describing its characteristics as flexible, low-cost, and useful for gaining insights and generating hypotheses. Exploratory research methods mentioned include literature reviews, experience surveys, focus groups, and case analyses. Literature reviews are described as comprehensive surveys of previous research that provide background, identify research gaps, and analyze published work. The document provides steps for conducting a literature review and emphasizes organizing findings thematically to identify trends, debates, and gaps.
This sample answer sheet corresponds with the eighth webinar in the Online Journal Club series, “How do young people make sense of cannabis evidence?"
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Cette exemple de feuille de réponse correspond au huitième webinaire de la série club de lecture en ligne, « Comment les jeunes interprètent-ils les données probantes relatives au cannabis? »
Le Centre de collaboration nationale des méthodes et outils est financé par l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada et affilié à l’Université McMaster. Les vues exprimées ici ne reflètent pas nécessairement la position officielle de l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada.
Le CCNMO est l’un des six centres de collaboration nationale en santé publique au Canada. Les Centres encouragent et améliorent l’utilisation des connaissances provenant de la recherche scientifique et des autres savoirs afin de renforcer la pratique et les politiques de santé publique au Canada.
This document reviews different search and retrieval strategies used to locate information from databases. It discusses formulating search queries using keywords and concepts, selecting relevant databases and resources, and employing various search techniques like Boolean, truncation, proximity and field-specific searches. The document also outlines the search process of reviewing and refining results and concludes with the importance of search strategies for library professionals and information seekers.
This document provides an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It defines systematic reviews as reviews that use explicit and reproducible methods to minimize bias in identifying, selecting, and synthesizing studies. Key elements of systematic reviews include formulating a clear question, conducting a comprehensive search, applying objective selection criteria, critically appraising included studies, and synthesizing data using meta-analysis if appropriate. Heterogeneity and reporting biases are important considerations in analyzing and interpreting systematic review results. The document outlines the process for conducting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
مراجعة الأدبيات المنهجيةsystematic literature review .ppt901202
This document provides an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It defines systematic reviews as reviews that use explicit and reproducible methods to minimize bias in identifying, selecting, and synthesizing studies. Key elements of systematic reviews include formulating a clear question, conducting a comprehensive search, applying objective selection criteria, assessing risk of bias, and synthesizing data, which may include meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and reporting bias are important considerations in analyzing and interpreting systematic review results. The document outlines the process for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
This document provides an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It defines systematic reviews as reviews of evidence on a clearly formulated question that use explicit and systematic methods. Key elements of systematic reviews include formulating a question, planning the review, conducting a comprehensive search, selecting and critically appraising studies, synthesizing data which may include meta-analysis, interpreting results, and reporting the review. Systematic reviews aim to reduce bias and allow results to be replicated.
A systematic literature review is a formal methodology to systematically identify and evaluate relevant research on a topic. It involves developing a review protocol and search strategy, screening studies for inclusion, assessing study quality, extracting data, and synthesizing findings. The process is more rigorous than a narrative review and aims to minimize bias by being comprehensive and transparent. Key aspects of the systematic review process include developing review questions, searching literature databases and other sources, selecting studies using inclusion/exclusion criteria, assessing study quality, extracting relevant data, and synthesizing the results.
Qualitative Research in Results-Based Financing: The Promise and The RealityRBFHealth
This document summarizes a review of qualitative research conducted as part of results-based financing (RBF) studies. The review assessed 17 RBF studies and found that while qualitative research holds promise to understand complex health systems, several challenges exist in practice. Studies often lacked depth in contextualization, sampling, and data collection methods. Opportunities exist to strengthen qualitative RBF research through more formative work to inform study design, locally grounded conceptual frameworks, strengthened fieldwork practices, and smaller, more focused qualitative components.
Here is a draft GANTT chart for my research plan:
Activity Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Plan x Submit 2nd Nov
Intro and x x
justification
Reading and x x x
Lit review
Methodology x x
and methods
Data x x x x
collection
Analysis of x x x
data
Writing up x x x x x
This draft GANTT chart raises some issues around timing for data collection and analysis. Data collection from January to April may be challenging given other commitments during that time period. The timeline for analysis of data and writing up may need to be
Essential skills in health research and scientific writingDr Ghaiath Hussein
This presentation is of the training on "Essential Skills in Health Research and Scientific Writing" that was help in Soba Teaching Hospital in Khartoum, in collaboration with the Sudanese American Medical Association (SAMA).
It was a 4 days training given on a rate of one session per week. It was almost all skills-based hands-on training.
Day 1: The theoretical part was an Introduction to the Knowledge Management Cycle and where research fits in this model. The practical part was how to conduct an online review of literature
Day 2: The theoretical part was about the responsible conduct of research, and scientific misconduct, with focus on plagiarism. The practical part included the installation and the use of Reference Manager, including how to import the references found in the LR (given in session 1) in a database in the Reference Manager software.
Day 3: The theoretical part covered the basics of scientific writing in English. The practical part included writing, and re-writing some pieces, using the provided phrasebanks and verbs 'cheat-sheets'.
Day 4 was on the writing for publication, including detailed description of the peer-review publication model and how it works. We also touched very briefly, due to time constraints, to an overview and two examples of ethical issues in research. The practical part included writing an effective cover Letter to the editor, choosing proper manuscript title, and writing an informed consent.
This document provides guidance on critiquing research studies. It defines a research critique as an analysis that focuses on a study's strengths and limitations. The purpose is to determine a study's usefulness. Key aspects of a critique examine the study's purpose, methodology, outcomes, conclusions, and overall quality. Both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies are discussed. The document outlines essential questions to consider for critiquing different parts of a study, such as the literature review, methodology, results, and discussion. Critiquing helps evaluate the scientific soundness and validity of published research.
Similar to Literature searching peer review in practice: enhancing the skills of searchers (20)
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Literature searching peer review in practice: enhancing the skills of searchers
1. LITERATURE SEARCHING PEER
REVIEW IN PRACTICE: ENHANCING THE
SKILLS OF SEARCHERS
Rachel Playforth & Igor Brbre
Brighton and Sussex NHS Library & Knowledge Service
HLG Conference 15 June 2018
3. Background
Brighton and Sussex NHS Library and Knowledge Service
• 3 libraries located at 3 sites
• 29 members of staff, 15 searchers
• Regular peer review of recently completed searches
This project
• Demonstrate how searching peer review works in practice
• Assess the impact
• Areas for improvement
4. Literature review
Pragmatic literature review April 2018. 16 papers selected.
Results in three main categories:
• about the PRESS instrument
• reports on usage of search peer review checklists
• guidelines encouraging peer review of searching
No reports of formal searching peer review practice in
libraries were found.
5. Why we do it
• Continuous service improvement
• Professional development
• Knowledge management and exchange
‘to detect errors, to improve quality, and to reduce not only the risk of missing
relevant studies but also the risk of identifying unnecessarily large numbers of
irrelevant records’ - HTAi Vortal, 2017
6. PRESS
Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies
2006 - study reveals errors in systematic review search strategies
2007 - CADTH funded study to assess the elements important for peer
review of search strategies
2008 - the first report including PRESS checklist published
2012, 2013 - research shows searching peer review improves quality
2014 - CADTH funds an update of the 2007 study
2016 - revised guideline statement and checklist published
7. PRESS and our adaptation
Our form pre-2015 Our current form PRESS 2015
Search question
Translation into concepts (PICO, followed
up request?)
[searcher supplied question and PICO]
Translation
Sources chosen Sources (strategy adapted?) [searcher supplied; single database only]
Search strategy
Search operators Boolean and proximity operators
Subject headings Subject headings
Natural language Text word searching
Spelling & syntax Spelling, syntax and line numbers
Search filters
Limits and filters
Limits
Search fields utilized [in Text word searching]
Attachments and
cover sheet
Presentation (search notes and summary)
Time spent
CPD needs identified
General comments General comments Overall evaluation
8. How we do it
• Managed through Searching and Teaching Peer Group
• Random pairings, every 4 months
• Review meeting in pairs
• Structured discussion using PRESS-based checklist
• Completed forms anonymised and summarised by chair of S&T Group
• Summary shared and discussed in the S&T group meeting
• Issues and CPD requirements taken forward and actioned
9. What we think of it
• Survey sent to 15 current and 7 former searchers
• Response rate n=11 (50%)
• Anonymous
• Asked about aspects of searching and opinions on peer
review process
• All but 1 thought peer review had made them a better
searcher
10. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Sources searched (range and appropriateness)
Proximity operators (ADJ et al.)
Writing search summaries
Using subject headings
Using PICO or other conceptual frameworks
Using search filters
Truncation and wildcards
Using database limits
Other (using KS)
Other (reduction in time spent)
Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT)
Using database fields
In which areas have you improved?
11. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Writing search summaries
Sources searched (range and appropriateness)
Proximity operators (ADJ et al.)
Using search filters
Using database fields
Using database limits
Using PICO or other conceptual frameworks
Using subject headings
Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT)
Truncation and wildcards
In which areas do you feel you could further improve?
13. What we think of it
Areas people found most difficult
• The peer review meeting itself
• The summaries discussed in our group meetings
Suggestions
• Do it less frequently
• Review (some) searches before (and after) completion
• Adapt the form for non-database searches
• Make feedback more actionable, develop training
14. What we will do next
• Revise our peer review form
• Discuss peer reviewing (some) searches before
completion
16. What else do we do
• Since 2017 - peer review of teaching
• Journal club
17. Selected bibliography
Sampson M, McGowan J. Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency. J Clin
Epidemiol 2006;59(10):1057-63. [accessed 25 April 2018]. Available from:
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0895-4356(06)00043-6
Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based practice
guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 2009 Sep;62(9):944-52
[accessed 25 April 2018]. Available from: https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(08)00320-
X/fulltext
McGowan, J., Sampson, M., & Lefebvre, C. (2010). An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review
of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC). Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(1),
149-154 [accessed 25 Apr 2018]. Available from:
https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/7402
Spry C, Mierzwinski-Urban M, Rabb D. Peer review of literature search strategies: does it make a
difference? Presented at Canadian Health Libraries Association (CHLA) Conference; 22-25 May 2013;
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Canada [accessed 25 April 2018]. Available from:
https://www.cadth.ca/media/is/CSpry_Poster.pdf
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of
Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6 [accessed
25 April 2018]. Available from: https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(16)00058-5/fulltext