This document provides guidance on preparing and publishing academic papers in journals. It discusses best practices for each section of a paper from the title page to conclusions. It also covers the peer review process and strategies for revising papers based on reviewer feedback. Additionally, it examines debates around measuring the impact and quality of academic research, journals, and institutions. Metrics discussed include journal rankings, citation counts, the H-index, and holistic approaches that consider impact on knowledge, teaching, practice, policy, the economy, and society. The document aims to help authors navigate the publishing process and issues relating to research assessment.
Episode 11 : Research Methodology
In discussing how and when objectives will be accomplished, it is important to denote clearly the responsibilities of the various personnel involved in the proposed project.
The Personnel section should describe all professional staff, state how much time each of the staff will spend on the project, and what the specific role of each will be.
In describing personnel, the proposer should carefully point out the competence and experience of each related to his/her project assignment.
The proposal should include resumes for key personnel, emphasizing background and relevant current publications which substantiate personnel ability to conduct the particular project.
Those papers which are in preparation, submitted, or in press, and which pertain to the project should
also be listed. Preprints may be included in an appendix.
It may, in fact, be necessary to prepare resumes suitable for the specific project.
Although resumes need not be included for support staff who play minor roles, it is essential to explain their tasks and to justify their appointments.
SAJJAD KHUDHUR ABBAS
Chemical Engineering , Al-Muthanna University, Iraq
Oil & Gas Safety and Health Professional – OSHACADEMY
Trainer of Trainers (TOT) - Canadian Center of Human
Development
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
Episode 11 : Research Methodology
In discussing how and when objectives will be accomplished, it is important to denote clearly the responsibilities of the various personnel involved in the proposed project.
The Personnel section should describe all professional staff, state how much time each of the staff will spend on the project, and what the specific role of each will be.
In describing personnel, the proposer should carefully point out the competence and experience of each related to his/her project assignment.
The proposal should include resumes for key personnel, emphasizing background and relevant current publications which substantiate personnel ability to conduct the particular project.
Those papers which are in preparation, submitted, or in press, and which pertain to the project should
also be listed. Preprints may be included in an appendix.
It may, in fact, be necessary to prepare resumes suitable for the specific project.
Although resumes need not be included for support staff who play minor roles, it is essential to explain their tasks and to justify their appointments.
SAJJAD KHUDHUR ABBAS
Chemical Engineering , Al-Muthanna University, Iraq
Oil & Gas Safety and Health Professional – OSHACADEMY
Trainer of Trainers (TOT) - Canadian Center of Human
Development
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
Episode 13 : Research Methodology ( Part 3 )
It’s the rational sequence of scrutinizing materialistic ideologies through scrupulous and moralistic efforts to make socio-ethical betterment……..
SAJJAD KHUDHUR ABBAS
Chemical Engineering , Al-Muthanna University, Iraq
Oil & Gas Safety and Health Professional – OSHACADEMY
Trainer of Trainers (TOT) - Canadian Center of Human
Development
Episode 15 : Research Methodology ( Part 5 )
Ranjit Kumar. "Research Methodology" Longman, 1996
Lindsay D. “A Guide to Scientific Writing” Longman, 1995
Ralph Berry. “How to write a Research Paper”, Pergamon, 1986
Gerson S J and Gerson S M. “Technical Writing Process and Product”, Prentice Hall, 1992
Coley S M and Scheinberg C A, "Proposal Writing", Newbury Sage Publications, 1990
Episode 13 : Research Methodology ( Part 3 )
It’s the rational sequence of scrutinizing materialistic ideologies through scrupulous and moralistic efforts to make socio-ethical betterment……..
SAJJAD KHUDHUR ABBAS
Chemical Engineering , Al-Muthanna University, Iraq
Oil & Gas Safety and Health Professional – OSHACADEMY
Trainer of Trainers (TOT) - Canadian Center of Human
Development
Episode 15 : Research Methodology ( Part 5 )
Ranjit Kumar. "Research Methodology" Longman, 1996
Lindsay D. “A Guide to Scientific Writing” Longman, 1995
Ralph Berry. “How to write a Research Paper”, Pergamon, 1986
Gerson S J and Gerson S M. “Technical Writing Process and Product”, Prentice Hall, 1992
Coley S M and Scheinberg C A, "Proposal Writing", Newbury Sage Publications, 1990
Digital Academy è formazione su competenze e innovazione digitale in azienda:
- percorsi di Digital Awareness per tutta l’azienda
- Sales 2.0 per la rete vendita
- Retail 2.0 per il trade marketing e il personale dei negozi
- Social Customer Care per i contact center
- Digital Marketing e Social Media & Digital PR per marketing e comunicazione
Research proposal: How to Write a Research ProposalM. A. Shahzad
Most students and beginning researchers do not fully understand what a research proposal means, nor do they understand its importance. To put it bluntly, one's research is only as a good as one's proposal. An ill-conceived proposal dooms the project even if it somehow gets through the Thesis Supervisory Committee. A high quality proposal, on the other hand, not/only promises success for the project, but also impresses your Thesis Committee about your potential as a researcher.
A research proposal is intended to convince others that you have a worthwhile research project and that you have the competence and the work-plan to complete it. Generally, a research proposal should contain all the key elements involved in the research process and include sufficient information for the readers to evaluate the proposed study.
Regardless of your research area and the methodology you choose, all research proposals must address the following questions: What you plan to accomplish, why you want to do it and how you are going to do it.
The proposal should have sufficient information to convince your readers that you have an important research idea, that you have a good grasp of the relevant literature and the major issues, and that your methodology is sound.
The quality of your research proposal depends not only on the quality of your proposed project, but also on the quality of your proposal writing. A good research project may run the risk of rejection simply because the proposal is poorly written. Therefore, it pays if your writing is coherent, clear and compelling.
This training focuses on proposal writing rather than on the development of research ideas.
Literature Review- Dr Ryan Thomas WilliamsRyan Williams
A review of the previous experiments and investigations done within our chosen topic area.
Shows how your chosen topic fits with the research that has gone before and puts this into context.
‘A researcher cannot perform significant research without first understanding the literature in the field’ (Boote and Beile, 2005: 3)
1
RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing
RESEARCH PROPOSAL - PART 1: INTRODUCTION, REVIEW OF LITERATURE, PROBLEM STATEMENT,
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Due at the end of week 7 (Sunday February 28, 2021 at midnight)
You need to conduct some research related to your own interests or to serve the interests of some organization
(employer/client/sponsor). Before you start writing a formal proposal, you (or your employer/client/sponsor) would like to
gather some information about the problem as well as understand its importance.
Choose your research topic thoughtfully and submit the topic of your research proposal for approval the latest by the end of
Week 3 (Sunday January 31, 2021 at midnight). You can find the submission box in Week 3.
This part of your research proposal should be roughly 7-9 pages (excluding cover page, references and annex) and written
in paragraphs, report format. All citations and references for this course are to be done in the APA style.
HERE ARE THE KEY PARTS OF THIS PART OF THE PROPOSAL (PART 1):
Title of your research
Make it intriguing – (BUT LESS THAN 120 CHARACTERS)
Introduction/Background
Provide a brief description of what the proposed research topic is about, why is it important and how you came to be
interested in it.
Literature Review
The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills in finding and analyzing valid literary resources for your research.
The review should be written in an integral / synthetic style, and NOT as an annotated bibliography.
Please note: Use in-text citations to reference all ideas, concepts, text, and data that are not your own. If you make a
statement, back it up with a reference!
• Research a minimum of 15 relevant business-related literature sources (focus on material available in digital
format only for this course). Carefully choose your 15 "keepers" that are clearly related to your study. (Note: you
might need to find 30 to “keep” only 15).
• Identify major common themes encountered in the selected literature sources. For each theme, create its own
subsection within the literature review.
• For each theme / subsection of the literature review, explain the opinions of the authors and show their
similarities, differences, methods of acquisition of data, methods of data analysis and other pertinent information.
State how the reviewed research results relate to your proposed study.
• Identify the gaps in the literature and explain what needs to be done to move forward in your research.
Statement of the Problem
Detail the problem that you are considering. Explain:
• How are you defining and delimiting the specific area of the research?
• What is the gap that will be addressed by this research?
• What it is that you hope to learn by conducting this research?
• Discuss the anticipated outcomes and benefits to the researcher, the organization, or society.
Research Questions
Provide focused ...
1 RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing RESEAAbbyWhyte974
1
RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing
RESEARCH PROPOSAL - PART 1: INTRODUCTION, REVIEW OF LITERATURE, PROBLEM STATEMENT,
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Due at the end of week 7 (Sunday February 28, 2021 at midnight)
You need to conduct some research related to your own interests or to serve the interests of some organization
(employer/client/sponsor). Before you start writing a formal proposal, you (or your employer/client/sponsor) would like to
gather some information about the problem as well as understand its importance.
Choose your research topic thoughtfully and submit the topic of your research proposal for approval the latest by the end of
Week 3 (Sunday January 31, 2021 at midnight). You can find the submission box in Week 3.
This part of your research proposal should be roughly 7-9 pages (excluding cover page, references and annex) and written
in paragraphs, report format. All citations and references for this course are to be done in the APA style.
HERE ARE THE KEY PARTS OF THIS PART OF THE PROPOSAL (PART 1):
Title of your research
Make it intriguing – (BUT LESS THAN 120 CHARACTERS)
Introduction/Background
Provide a brief description of what the proposed research topic is about, why is it important and how you came to be
interested in it.
Literature Review
The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills in finding and analyzing valid literary resources for your research.
The review should be written in an integral / synthetic style, and NOT as an annotated bibliography.
Please note: Use in-text citations to reference all ideas, concepts, text, and data that are not your own. If you make a
statement, back it up with a reference!
• Research a minimum of 15 relevant business-related literature sources (focus on material available in digital
format only for this course). Carefully choose your 15 "keepers" that are clearly related to your study. (Note: you
might need to find 30 to “keep” only 15).
• Identify major common themes encountered in the selected literature sources. For each theme, create its own
subsection within the literature review.
• For each theme / subsection of the literature review, explain the opinions of the authors and show their
similarities, differences, methods of acquisition of data, methods of data analysis and other pertinent information.
State how the reviewed research results relate to your proposed study.
• Identify the gaps in the literature and explain what needs to be done to move forward in your research.
Statement of the Problem
Detail the problem that you are considering. Explain:
• How are you defining and delimiting the specific area of the research?
• What is the gap that will be addressed by this research?
• What it is that you hope to learn by conducting this research?
• Discuss the anticipated outcomes and benefits to the researcher, the organization, or society.
Research Questions
Provide focused ...
II. Formatting Guidelines
Margins
All copies of a thesis or dissertation must have the following uniform margins throughout the entire document:
Left: 1″ (or 1 1/4" to ensure sufficient room for binding the work if desired)
Right: 1″
Bottom: 1″ (with allowances for page numbers; see section on Pagination)
Top: 1″
Exceptions: The first page of each chapter (including the introduction, if any) begins 2″ from the top of the page. Also, the headings on the title page, abstract, first page of the dedication/ acknowledgements/preface (if any), and first page of the table of contents begin 2″ from the top of the page.
Non-Traditional Formats
Non-traditional theses or dissertations such as whole works comprised of digital, artistic, video, or performance materials (i.e., no written text, chapters, or articles) are acceptable if approved by your committee and graduate program. A PDF document with a title page, copyright page, and abstract at minimum are required to be submitted along with any relevant supplemental files.
Font Type and Size
To ensure clear and legible text for all copies, choose a TrueType font recommended by ProQuest Dissertation Publishing. A list of recommended fonts can be found on ProQuest's sitepdf icon.
Fonts must be 10, 11, or 12 points in size. Superscripts and subscripts (e.g., formulas, or footnote or endnote numbers) should be no more than 2 points smaller than the font size used for the body of the text.
Spacing and Indentation
Space and indent your thesis or dissertation following these guidelines:
Spacing and Indentation with mesaurements described in surrounding text
The text must appear in a single column on each page and be double-spaced throughout the document. Do not arrange chapter text in multiple columns.
New paragraphs must be indicated by a consistent tab indentation throughout the entire document.
The document text must be left-justified, not centered or right-justified.
For blocked quotations, indent the entire text of the quotation consistently from the left margin.
Ensure headings are not left hanging alone on the bottom of a prior page. The text following should be moved up or the heading should be moved down. This is something to check near the end of formatting, as other adjustments to text and spacing may change where headings appear on the page.
Exceptions: Blocked quotations, notes, captions, legends, and long headings must be single-spaced throughout the document and double-spaced between items.
Pagination
Paginate your thesis or dissertation following these guidelines:
Use lower case Roman numerals (ii, iii, iv, etc.) on all pages preceding the first page of chapter one. The title page counts as page i, but the number does not appear. Therefore, the first page showing a number will be the copyright page with ii at the bottom.
Arabic numerals (beginning with 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.) start at chapter one or the introduction, if applicable. Arabic numbers must be included on all pages of the text, illustr
These slides are related to our last event at the Sapienza University of Rome for the graduate students. Please follow our website: https://www.facebook.com/psa.sapienza
This presentation covers the basics of preparing a research proposal in Social Sciences.
A Malayalam video explaining this presentation can be accessed at https://youtu.be/acg9Y3mQs9A
Note: This is not suitable for preparing a proposal for research funding
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
1. Publishing, politics
and knowledge
transfer
Jeffrey Faux
Editor – Asian Review of
Accounting
June 2011
2. Preparing a paper for a journal
• Comply with journal’s guidelines to authors
• “Sycophancy” editorial board/likely referees –
the chances are their work is worth reading
• Be systematic in your working methods – keep
versions of your paper clearly labelled, data files
structured and maintained
• Be prepared for a long wait for reviewer’s
comments, especially from “better” journals
• Don’t be tempted to send to more than one
journal at a time it is unethical
3. Anatomy of a typical paper
• Title page
• Abstract
• Introduction
• Literature Review
• Method
• Findings
• Discussion
• Conclusions
4. Title page
• Title
• Authors & identification of corresponding authors
• Contact Details of all authors
• This page is removed by the editor before sending to
referees
• There should not be anything in the paper that
identifies the authors or their institution
• Use “Author, (2000)” or XYZ University
5. Abstract
• Your chance to make a first impression and keep it
simple!
• Conform to guidelines on word length
• Ask a non-specialist to read the paper
• Emerald’s abstract format:
• Purpose of the paper
• Design / Method / Approach
• Findings
• Implications for research, practice and/or society
• Does the paper identify clearly any implications for research,
practice and/or society?
• Does the paper bridge the gap between theory and practice? How
can the research be used in practice (economic and commercial
impact), in teaching, to influence public policy, in research
(contributing to the body of knowledge)?
• What is the impact upon society (influencing public attitudes,
affecting quality of life)?
• Are these implications consistent with the findings and conclusions
of the paper?
• Keywords (up to 6)
• Word limit
6. Introduction (See Ashton)
• Clearly state what the paper is about and why the
topic is important
• Reader needs a clear and concise statement about
the reason/s for doing the research in the first
paragraph
• Who cares and why?
• Provide the structure of the paper
7. Literature review
• Ashton talks of a model or framework – an empirical
bias
• Opportunity to position your work in the literature
• Need to ensure you have included seminal pieces
and up to date references to ‘quality’ journals
• This is the Editor’s first quality control check
• “Does this person know what they are doing?”
• “Does this paper have the potential to make a
contribution to the existing literature?”
• Ends with research questions/aims
8. Method
• Methodology is the study of methods
• In this section you justify your choice of method
• Need to demonstrate that this method will enable
you to answer the questions identified or achieve
your aims
• In your literature review you will learn the methods
tried previously and which worked and which didn’t
9. Results / Findings
• Chose how to analyse your data / present your
results
• Use appropriate statistical tests
• Simple and effective is better than complicated and
difficult to understand
• Provide dates of surveys, sample sizes, response
rates
• How have you dealt with outliers?
10. Discussion
• Implications of the study
• Link back to research questions
• Some of the author’s thoughts about such issues
• Do not repeat what is already in the paper
• Can the results be generalised?
11. Conclusion
• Revisit the aims – have you achieved them?
• Are the results capable of generalisation
• Limitations of the study
• Possible future research opportunities
• Extending the sample, international comparisons,
inter-temporal comparisons, different result methods
12. Why manuscripts are rejected
• Drawn from - Journal of Accounting Education –
1998 to 2004
• 1,300 submissions (estimated)
• 3,900 review hours (estimated)
• 75% rejection rate
• 2,925 hours on rejected manuscripts
• 73 work weeks on rejected manuscripts
• 1.41 work years on rejected manuscripts
(Data & graphs courtesy of Jim Rebele, Editor-in-Chief)
15. Analysis of Motivation/Background
Rejects
1. Not interesting or relevant to
the readers/reviewers
2. Not consistent with the
journal’s objectives/paper is
too “general” (e.g., not
accounting education)
3. Poor “motivation” (the authors
haven’t established a reason
for doing the study)
4. Failure to “position” the paper
vis-à-vis the existing literature
in education (both accounting
education and the general
education literature)/lack of
originality of thought/similar
paper published elsewhere
Main Section Articles: Breakdown of
"Motivation/Background" into Components
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1 2 3 4
Reason for Rejection
Frequency (absolute)
16. Results, implications, conclusions
rejects
1. Paper does not represent a
meaningful contribution to the
accounting education literature
(i.e., insufficient/trivial
contribution)
2. Insufficient evidence/data are
not persuasive
3. Failure to adequately address
educational implications (e.g.,
does not provide meaningful
discussion of how the paper
can be used to improve the
process of accounting
education, broadly defined/the
authors fail to offer action-oriented
recommendations)
Main Section Articles Rejected after First-Round
Analysis: Breakdown of "Results, Implications, and
Conclusions" into Components
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1 2 3
Reason for Rejection
Frequency (Absolute)
17. Receiving the Reviewers’
comments
• All academic papers will be criticised – don’t take it
personally
• Read the reviews and the editor’s comments, but
don’t do anything on the day you receive them
• Discuss with co-author, mentor, colleagues
• Is the paper fundamentally “flawed”?
• Are the inadequacies in method (data) irreparable?
• Can the data be re-analysed?
18. Revising
• A request for revision is good news! It really is
• You are now in the publishing cycle. Nearly every
published paper is revised at least once
• Don’t panic!
• Even if the comments are sharp
or discouraging, they aren’t personal
• Demonstrably and systematically deal with points
raised by reviewers
• Can you satisfy (to a large extent) the reviewers’
criticisms?
• Be polite and engaging in your response
• Don’t kid yourself – is it time to give up with this
journal?
19. The politics of research
• The impact of research outside academia is gaining
increased prominence as governments demand
Return on Investment measures
• Accreditation organisations such as the AACSB and
the EFMD recognise research impact as the key
indicator of quality
BUT IT REMAINS AS THE KEY INTERNATIONAL
ISSUE: HOW TO MEASURE RESEARCH IMPACT
• The Excellence of Research for Australia (ERA)
journal rankings created a deal of hysteria and the
reason was that the rankings were not going to
achieve a quantifiable quality measure. (Hence the
dumping last week)
20. Senator Kim Carr 20 May to ERA
2010 methodology for the ERA2012
assessment
The changes include:
• The refinement of the journal quality indicator to remove the prescriptive A*,
A, B and C ranks;
• The introduction of a journal quality profile, showing the most frequently
published journals for each unit of evaluation;
• Increased capacity to accommodate multi-disciplinary research to allow
articles with significant content from a given discipline to be assigned to that
discipline, regardless of where it is published (this method was successfully
trialled in ERA 2010 within Mathematical Sciences);
• Alignment across the board of the low volume threshold to 50 outputs
(bringing peer-reviewed disciplines in line with citation disciplines, up from
30 outputs);
• The relaxation of rules on the attribution of patents, plant breeders’ rights
and registered design, to allow those granted to eligible researchers to also
be submitted; and
• The modification of fractional staff eligibility requirements to 0.4 FTE (up
from 0.1 FTE), while maintaining the right to submit for staff below this
threshold where affiliation is shown, through use of a by-line, for instance).
21. Other measures of impact – the
H-Index
The H-Index
• The H-Index was formulated by a physicist called Hirsch to give
‘a robust single-number metric of a journal's impact, combining
quality with quantity.
• It can be represented thus:
There is anecdotal evidence
that it is being quoted by
academics in their CVs
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-index
22. H-Index
• The H-index aims to provide a robust single-number
metric of a journal's impact:
“An author with an index of 6 has published 6 papers
each of which has been cited by others at least 6
times. Thus, the h-index reflects both the number of
publications and the number of citations per
publication”
BUT… where are the citations from?
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-index
23. H-Index: Another view
Confusion reigns…
• Search on International Marketing Review for its H-index
had following results:
• On Web of Science (ISI): H = 12
• On Scopus: H = 19
• On Publish or Perish: H = 53
WARNING… where are the citations from?
• Published research should have impact and citation
alone is an incomplete measure of value
24. A holistic view of measuring the
impact of research
A holistic, more rounded approach that considers
research impact at many levels is needed:
• Knowledge
• Teaching
• Practice
• Policy making
• Economy
• Society
• This is the Emerald approach
25. Demonstrating impact as
knowledge transfer
• How can you demonstrate your research has
impact?
• How can you demonstrate that your teaching is
cutting edge in terms of content AND PRACTICE?
• Does your paper identify clearly any implications
for research, practice and/or society?
• How can your research be used in practice
(economic and commercial impact), in teaching, to
influence public policy, in research (contributing
to the body of knowledge)?
• What is the impact upon society (influencing
public attitudes, affecting quality of life)?
26. Accounting journals
• Thirty years ago there were only nine Accounting
journals published by major publishers
• In 2010 there were 47 (110)
• Cabells lists over 90 Accounting journals with
rejection rates
• ISI lists 12 accounting journals (approx)
• Scopus lists 50 accounting journals (approx)
Emerald’s Accounting & Finance portfolio:
• 15 Accounting journals
• 10 Finance journals
• 14 Accounting & Finance books
• 1.2 million article downloads in 2010
27. Useful resources
• www.isiknowledge.com (ISI ranking lists and impact
factors)
• www.harzing.com (Anne-Wil Harzing's site about
academic publishing and the assessment of research
and journal quality, as well as ‘Publish or Perish’
software to conduct citation analysis)
• www.scopus.com (abstract and citation database of
research literature and quality web sources)
• www.cabells.com (addresses, phone, e-mail and
websites for a large number of journals as well as
information on publication guidelines and review
information)
28. CONTACT DETAILS
Associate Professor Jeffrey Faux
Associate Dean Teaching & Learning
EMAIL jeffrey.faux@vu.edu.au