Bridging The Research-Practice Gap Through Evidence-Based Management And Systematic Review.
David Denyer and Rob Briner
Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia
Research Design -Definitions -Features - Steps in Planning Research Design - Types of Research Design - Exploratory, Descriptive, and Causal Research Designs
Systematic review international conference slidesvijay kumar
This PowerPoint is about systematic review. The talk was delivered at an International Conference. All videos related to research conferences can be viewed at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEUKBUIaQG3wr05Sj38oDA/featured
Research Awareness Programme-research & developmentlochan100
Tulsiramji Gaikwad-Patil College of Engineering and Technology
Wardha Road, Nagpur-441 108
NAAC Accredited
Department of Information Technology developed By Dr PL Pradhan
Second Year B.E. (Fifth Semester)
Research & Development
Tulsiramji Gaikwad-Patil College of Engineering and Technology
Wardha Road, Nagpur-441 108
NAAC Accredited
Bridging The Research-Practice Gap Through Evidence-Based Management And Systematic Review.
David Denyer and Rob Briner
Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia
Research Design -Definitions -Features - Steps in Planning Research Design - Types of Research Design - Exploratory, Descriptive, and Causal Research Designs
Systematic review international conference slidesvijay kumar
This PowerPoint is about systematic review. The talk was delivered at an International Conference. All videos related to research conferences can be viewed at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEUKBUIaQG3wr05Sj38oDA/featured
Research Awareness Programme-research & developmentlochan100
Tulsiramji Gaikwad-Patil College of Engineering and Technology
Wardha Road, Nagpur-441 108
NAAC Accredited
Department of Information Technology developed By Dr PL Pradhan
Second Year B.E. (Fifth Semester)
Research & Development
Tulsiramji Gaikwad-Patil College of Engineering and Technology
Wardha Road, Nagpur-441 108
NAAC Accredited
Writing for Publishing in Technology Enhanced Learning ResearchIain Doherty
This is a presentation that I gave for the Write-TEL 2 (http://www.napiereducationexchange.com/pg/groups/12872/writetel-2/) writing workshop series. I provided a perspective on writing to get published in the area of technology enhanced learning. The basic thrust of the presentation is that good research naturally leads to a good research paper.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
Introduction to writing research questions and determining what variables to use. Introductory concepts for school personnel interested in action research.
Measuring the effectiveness of library information literacy instructionElise Wong
Measuring the effectiveness of library information literacy instruction / Elise Y. Wong, Sharon Radcliff, Gina Kessler Lee, and Suellen Cox, Librarians at Saint Mary’s College of California.
Our project aimed to strengthen the connection between English Composition courses and library instruction sessions to achieve information literacy learning goals. To this end, SMC librarians compared two versions of library instruction in ENGL5 “Argument & Research” sections to measure the effectiveness of embedding the “information evaluation and research practices” and “critical thinking” learning outcomes into our library instruction.
This presentation covers the basics of preparing a research proposal in Social Sciences.
A Malayalam video explaining this presentation can be accessed at https://youtu.be/acg9Y3mQs9A
Note: This is not suitable for preparing a proposal for research funding
Writing for Publishing in Technology Enhanced Learning ResearchIain Doherty
This is a presentation that I gave for the Write-TEL 2 (http://www.napiereducationexchange.com/pg/groups/12872/writetel-2/) writing workshop series. I provided a perspective on writing to get published in the area of technology enhanced learning. The basic thrust of the presentation is that good research naturally leads to a good research paper.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
Introduction to writing research questions and determining what variables to use. Introductory concepts for school personnel interested in action research.
Measuring the effectiveness of library information literacy instructionElise Wong
Measuring the effectiveness of library information literacy instruction / Elise Y. Wong, Sharon Radcliff, Gina Kessler Lee, and Suellen Cox, Librarians at Saint Mary’s College of California.
Our project aimed to strengthen the connection between English Composition courses and library instruction sessions to achieve information literacy learning goals. To this end, SMC librarians compared two versions of library instruction in ENGL5 “Argument & Research” sections to measure the effectiveness of embedding the “information evaluation and research practices” and “critical thinking” learning outcomes into our library instruction.
This presentation covers the basics of preparing a research proposal in Social Sciences.
A Malayalam video explaining this presentation can be accessed at https://youtu.be/acg9Y3mQs9A
Note: This is not suitable for preparing a proposal for research funding
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
3. Exploratory Research
• Converting broad, vague problem statements into
small, precise problem statements
• Early stages of research
• To formulate hypothesis
4. Characteristics of Exploratory Research
• It is flexible and versatile
• Data collection structured forms are not used
• Experimentation is not a requirement
• Cost is low
• Possibility of exploration of views
5. What circumstances is exploratory study ideal?
• To gain insight into the problem
• To generate new product ideas
• To assess the various alternatives
• To develop hypothesis
• To clarify concepts and formulating precise problems
• To pretest a draft questionnaire
7. Literature Review
• It is a comprehensive survey of a previous research
• The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books,
Journals and other sources relevant to your study
• The main aim is to find out problems that are already
investigated and those that need further investigation
• It gives us knowledge about what others have found out in
the related field of study and how they have done so
8. Literature Review – Why it is needed
• Provide background information
• Identify the focus of research
• Introduce the topic to readers
• Address the trend
• Provide a framework of method
• Analyze the published
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 8
9. Literature Review – Where to start
• Where are the major databases/ sources that have been
recommended by your supervisor/mentor?
• Focus on the central research problem and bring out the key
words
• Prepare a list of journals in your area of research
• Give it a title focused towards your objectives
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 9
10. Literature review: Key points
• Read relevant(up-to-date) literature
• Refer original works
• Read with comprehension
• Index the literature
• State what others have said/done, and what not
• Discuss what others have said/done towards developing a theme out
of other studies, to end up with identifying research gaps.
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 10
11. Literature review in 5 steps
1. Search for a literature relevant for your study
• Develop a list of keywords
• Develop a list of synonyms for these key words
• Open a scholarly database(Google scholar, EBSCO, Science direct, Scopus etc)
• Use Boolean Operators(AND, OR, NOT etc.)
Boolean Operators are simple words (AND, OR, NOT etc.) used as conjunctions to
combine or exclude keywords in a search, resulting in more focused and productive
results. This should save time and effort by eliminating inappropriate hits that must be
scanned before discarding.
• Identify the most important publication
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 11
12. Literature review in 5 steps
2. Evaluate and select source
• Do not read the full research , read the abstract
• Look at the bibliography of the publication for other relevant
sources
• Observe the number of high citation count
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 12
13. Example…
Impact of Intrinsic Motivation and Institutional
Support on Faculty Research Productivity
RV Institute of
Management
Go, change the world
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 13
14. Literature review in 5 steps
3. Identify themes, debates and gaps
• Take not of the connections of different sources to easily
organise your literature review
• Observe for the trends, patterns and themes
• Debates and contradictions
• Influential studies
• Gaps
RV Institute of
Management
Go, change the world
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 14
15. Literature review in 5 steps
4. Organise by outlining
• Chronological
• From older to new publication
• Thematic
• Organised around several key themes
• Methodological
• Compare the different research methods being used across studies
• Theoretical
• Used to discuss opposing theories or models
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 15
16. Literature
Author, Year &
Area
Title Methodology Sampling Variables Findings
Sohail Khan
(1996)
KURDISTAN,
IRAQ*
The impact of
staff training
and
development on
teachers’
research
productivity
Structured
Questionnaire 58 teachers
Expertise, Morale, Skill,
competency of
supervisors, trust
T&D to have profound
influence on teachers’
productivity, therefore
teachers need to be regularly
motivated for training
programs in to enhance their
productivity.
Morgan, Clauset
(1999)
USA*
Research
Productivity,
prominence,
and the effects
of academic
environment
Matched-pairs
experimental design
using a Survey
2,453 early-
career faculty at
all 205 PhD-
granting CSE
departments.
Work environment,
training, scholarly
impact,
Characteristics of a work
environment are more
predictive of faculty
productivity than preferential
selection or retention
Shaker, Plater
(GEORGIA
UNIVERSITY*
(2001)
The Public
Good,
Productivity
and Faculty
Work:
Individual
Effort and
Social Value
Delphi technique Secondary data
analysis
Rubrics, Service, ISR,
Societal Impact,
community service,
positive attitude.
Credentials without quality
and teaching without public
purpose lead inevitably to
the decline of American
higher education
Michael M.
Rawls (2002)
TEXAS* PUBLIC
INSTITUTES
Assessing
Research
Productivity
from an
Institutional
Effectiveness
Perspective.
Quantitative &
Qualitative Designs
–Questionnaire
62 Institutions
Priority for research,
research assistants,
collective research
goals of department,
peer productivity
Core facilities appear to be
insufficient in terms of
capacity to meet demand
and are operated without an
adequate staffing model to
provide the expertise
needed
Mariom,
McMorther
(2012)
VIRGINIA*
Understanding
the productivity
of faculty
members in
higher
education
Descriptive case
study design
293 full time
employees
[department of
biomedical
engineering]
Time, self
advancement,
reporting, workloads,
financial inducements
Administrators must look at
workload expectations for
faculty and create policies to
help manage their time
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 16
17. Literature review in 5 steps
5. Start writing the literature review
• Introduction
• Cite and present the study
• Main body
• Summarises and synthesis the sources to your study
• Conclusion
• The function of your paper’s conclusion is to restate the main argument.
It reminds the reader of the strengths of your main arguments and
reiterates the most important evidence supporting those arguments.
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 17
18. Literature review - Funnel approach – 80:20 rule
So you start with the broader aspects of your topic (the contextual background, for instance)
and then gradually narrow your focus until you reach the specific aspect of the topic that you
will be addressing.
Ex: Marketing strategies of two wheelers manufacturers with special reference to Karnataka
• Review of research studies on Marketing strategies in general
• Review of research studies on Marketing strategies in manufacturing
• Review of research studies on Marketing strategies in Automobile manufacturing
• Review of closely related research studies on MS -TWM in India
4/17/2023
RVIM, Bangalore 18
19. Experience survey
• It is desirable to talk to persons who are well informed in the
areas being investigated
• No questionnaire is required
• The approach adopted should be highly unstructured
• Non probability sampling can be used
Ex: Group of housewives may be approached for their choice for a
“ready to cook product”
20. Focus group
• A small number of individuals are brought together to study and
talk about some topic of interest
• The discussion is coordinated by a moderator
• The group usually consists of 8 – 12 persons and they should
have a common background and experience.
• The typical focus group lasts for one to two hours
Ex: Reva car
21. Analysis of selected cases
• Gives an insight into the problem which is being researched
• The result of investigation of case histories are always considered
suggestive, rather than conclusive
Ex: Ready to eat food
23. Descriptive research
• Describe the characteristics of the population
• Provides association between two variables
• Clear specification on Who, What, When, Where,
Why and How.
25. Difference between exploratory and descriptive Study
Basis for
comparison
Exploratory Research Descriptive Research
Meaning Exploratory research means
a research conducted for
formulating a problem for
more clear investigation.
Descriptive research is a research
that explore and explain an
individual, group or a situation.
Objective Discovery of ideas and
thoughts.
Describe characteristics and
functions.
Overall Design Flexible Rigid
Research process Unstructured Structured
Sampling Non-probability sampling Probability sampling
Statistical Design No pre-planned design for
analysis.
Pre-planned design for analysis.