Self-paced exercise for students to follow in teams - to ask questions about FINDING and ANALYZING their sources. Focused on UMBC, but adaptable for your local University/College. Helps students create an annotated bibliography. ENGL 100
Link here for an updated version of this slideshow: https://www.slideshare.net/khornberger/annotated-bibliographies-234696125
How to create an annotated bibliography with focus upon the annotation portion.
Do you know the difference between Abstract and Annotated Bibliography? If not, you are welcome to watch this presentation and to read an article https://essay-academy.com/account/blog/abstract-vs-annotated-bibliography
The role of the literature review Your literature review gives y.docxoreo10
The role of the literature review
Your literature review gives your readers an understanding of the evolution of scholarly research on your topic.
In your literature review you will:
•survey the scholarly landscape
•provide a synthesis of the issues, trends, and concepts
•possibly provide some historical background
Throughout the literature review, your emphasis should fall on the current scholarly conversation. This is why the rubric often specifies that you need resources from peer-reviewed journals, published within the last five years of your anticipated graduation date. It's in these recent, peer-reviewed journals that the scholarly debate is being carried out!
The literature review also shows the "gap" in the conversation -- and how your own doctoral study will fill that gap and contribute to the scholarly knowledge. This is where you make the case for the importance and usefulness for your own work.
Searching comprehensively
Your literature review should be as comprehensive as possible -- you want to include all of the relevant resources dealing with your topic. Missing important articles or researchers will significantly weaken your scholarship! So, searching comprehensively becomes important.
To ensuring comprehensiveness:
•Identify the databases that will cover your topic
◦Spend some time reading the descriptions of the databases in your subject area
◦Contact the Library to get advice from a librarian on appropriate databases
◦Some topics cross over subject/theoretical boundaries, and librarians can suggest databases that you may not have considered
•Search in more than one database
◦Some of our databases are huge, containing thousands of journals, but no single database covers every journal relevant to a topic
◦Searching in each relevant database, one at a time, gives you a better sense of control over your search, as well as a more accurate idea of the journals/databases that you've covered
Using a multi-database search (such as Thoreau) is not necessarily recommended; in doing so, you lose the ability to use subject terms and search limits that may be unique to each database.
•Explore resources outside of the databases:
◦Government websites
◦Professional organizations
◦Research groups
◦Think tanks
These can all be important sources of statistics and reliable information. These will not be peer-reviewed resources (i.e. since they are not journals, they do not employ the same sort of editorial process that results in peer-review). Evaluating for reliability is important!
Beyond the Library: Google Scholar
Google Scholar provides a good way to take your search beyond the databases; it searches very broadly and will pull in resources you may not have discovered before.
Google's definition of scholarly includes government sites, think tanks, research organizations, journal websites, and of course colleges and universities.
Unfortunately, there is no way to limit your Google Scholar search to only peer-reviewed res ...
Link here for an updated version of this slideshow: https://www.slideshare.net/khornberger/annotated-bibliographies-234696125
How to create an annotated bibliography with focus upon the annotation portion.
Do you know the difference between Abstract and Annotated Bibliography? If not, you are welcome to watch this presentation and to read an article https://essay-academy.com/account/blog/abstract-vs-annotated-bibliography
The role of the literature review Your literature review gives y.docxoreo10
The role of the literature review
Your literature review gives your readers an understanding of the evolution of scholarly research on your topic.
In your literature review you will:
•survey the scholarly landscape
•provide a synthesis of the issues, trends, and concepts
•possibly provide some historical background
Throughout the literature review, your emphasis should fall on the current scholarly conversation. This is why the rubric often specifies that you need resources from peer-reviewed journals, published within the last five years of your anticipated graduation date. It's in these recent, peer-reviewed journals that the scholarly debate is being carried out!
The literature review also shows the "gap" in the conversation -- and how your own doctoral study will fill that gap and contribute to the scholarly knowledge. This is where you make the case for the importance and usefulness for your own work.
Searching comprehensively
Your literature review should be as comprehensive as possible -- you want to include all of the relevant resources dealing with your topic. Missing important articles or researchers will significantly weaken your scholarship! So, searching comprehensively becomes important.
To ensuring comprehensiveness:
•Identify the databases that will cover your topic
◦Spend some time reading the descriptions of the databases in your subject area
◦Contact the Library to get advice from a librarian on appropriate databases
◦Some topics cross over subject/theoretical boundaries, and librarians can suggest databases that you may not have considered
•Search in more than one database
◦Some of our databases are huge, containing thousands of journals, but no single database covers every journal relevant to a topic
◦Searching in each relevant database, one at a time, gives you a better sense of control over your search, as well as a more accurate idea of the journals/databases that you've covered
Using a multi-database search (such as Thoreau) is not necessarily recommended; in doing so, you lose the ability to use subject terms and search limits that may be unique to each database.
•Explore resources outside of the databases:
◦Government websites
◦Professional organizations
◦Research groups
◦Think tanks
These can all be important sources of statistics and reliable information. These will not be peer-reviewed resources (i.e. since they are not journals, they do not employ the same sort of editorial process that results in peer-review). Evaluating for reliability is important!
Beyond the Library: Google Scholar
Google Scholar provides a good way to take your search beyond the databases; it searches very broadly and will pull in resources you may not have discovered before.
Google's definition of scholarly includes government sites, think tanks, research organizations, journal websites, and of course colleges and universities.
Unfortunately, there is no way to limit your Google Scholar search to only peer-reviewed res ...
How to Do Literature Review in Mass Media Research.pptxMuhammad Awais
Choose a topic. Define your research question.
Your literature review should be guided by a central research question. Remember, it is not a collection of loosely related studies in a field but instead represents background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way.
Decide on the scope of your review.
How many studies do you need to look at? How comprehensive should it be? How many years should it cover?
A literature review is a survey of academic sources on a particular project topic. It gives an overview of the ebb and flows information, permitting you to distinguish significant hypotheses, strategies, and holes in the current research.
A literature review is to show your reader that you have read, and have a good grasp of, the main published work concerning a particular topic or question in your field.
English 102 Rhetorical Analysis Writing Project 2 R.docxSALU18
English 102 Rhetorical Analysis Writing Project 2
Relevant course readings:
Laura Bolin Carroll: “Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps toward Rhetorical Analysis” Kerry Dirk:
“Navigating Genres”
Keith GrantDavie: “Rhetorical Situations and Their Constituents”
Due dates:
Response draft (at least 1300 words for full credit) due: (one copy uploaded to Moodle; two hard
copies brought to class for exchange):
Feedback letters/response groups meet: (letters uploaded and brought to class):
Polished draft (at least 1600 words for full credit): (in hard copy, delivered in class):
For the second major writing project of the semester, you’ll produce a comparative rhetorical
analysis by choosing between two different options—scientific or political discourse—and
finding and comparing two instances of rhetorical discourse. Whatever option you select, you’ll
need to address the same questions as you develop your understanding of rhetorical discourse
and the way different discourses address differences in rhetorical situation:
1. The question of exigence: What is the discourse about? What need or purpose does the
discourse address? What fundamental values are at stake? What is the discourse trying to
accomplish—and how successful is it?
2. The question of the rhetor: Who is—or are—the rhetor or rhetors? Who is responsible for the
discourse? Who created it? Does the rhetor successfully establish ethos? Why or why not? How
does the discourse itself invoke a particular rhetor? Who sponsored the discourse, and how?
3. The question of audience: For whom is the discourse intended? To whom would this
discourse appeal? Who is the actual audience, and who is the audience invoked or imagined by
the discourse itself? Does the discourse invite the audience to adopt a new role, a new identity?
4. The question of constraints: What constraints did the rhetor have to take into account—what
factors outside of the discourse and beyond the rhetor’s control might influence the audience’s
response to the discourse? Are they negative or positive constraints? How did the rhetor
accommodate those constraints? Was the rhetor successful?
5. The question of genre: What is the genre of the text, and what purpose does this genre
typically serve? How do audience expectations of the genre contribute to our understanding of
the exigence, the intended audience, and the rhetor? What constraints does the genre
introduce?
These constituents of rhetorical situations aren’t an outline for your project; you won’t march
through each of them in succession in the body of your project. Rather, they’re your initial
research questions that will help you to analyze thoroughly the rhetorical dimensions of the texts
you select.
The form and structure of your project will depend, finally, on a refined research question that
will develop out of your research and your understanding of how your chosen texts work.
Project Options:
...
Session for 2nd yr UGs or those beginning 3rd yr UG on the beginning stages of choosing a dissertation topic, a study to carry out and mapping information available in your interest area
Set of questions students can work through independently (or as a class.) Students identify favorite sentences, places where more vigorous verbs are needed, "quicksand moments", and play the "believing/doubting game". Finally, they review the assignment against the rubric. This is good for teachers to look at also, as it explains the rationale for each exercise.
Aristotelian Appeals, Logos, Ethos, Pathos, demonstrated by Wile E Coyote, and then an exercise for the students to create their own ad slogans using the same appeals.
Adapted from a logical fallacies quiz I once found online. This provides the example of the fallacy (in a burrito request) , and then provides the term given to that, such as "slippery slope"
The ROPES of presentations - Technical CommunicationApril_Walters
For Technical Communication (ENGL393) at UMBC, uses the ROPES model (Review, Overview, Presenting, Exercises, Summary) as a guiding structure for group presentations. Follows the ROPES model as it presents it. Also has bonus "paraphrase yourself" advice at end
UMBC source challenge - research writing extraApril_Walters
Encourages students to find professors at their own university (UMBC) researching their same topic. Also shows how they can do their own original research (URA, URCAD, OUE)
Research Writing – organization exercise with cardsApril_Walters
This is an exercise I can do in class or have students do independently to organize their research writing ideas. The use of physical cards or post-its breaks students away from their screens. The collaborative aspect helps them see multiple ways to organize the same data. (English 100 - first year composition. UMBC)
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Library Adventure - Annotated Bibliography
1. WEEK 5 WORKSHOP WEEK
What to do
when you’re not in conference
with a Writing Fellow or Ms. Walters
2. PROPOSAL POSTED? TIME PLANNED?
Make sure you have …
posted your Research Proposal in
BlackBoard.
recorded all deadlines in your own planner
blocked out time for finding research, reading
your research, exploratory writing, revising
your writing, researching more, rewriting, and
editing.
It can be helpful to observe your patterns – do you
prefer to write in large blocks of time? Can you
read in short bits of time between classes? What
times of day are most useful for you to work?
3. LIBRARY ADVENTURE
Due in Week 6
Videos: At the AOK Library Page, under the
Resources/Tutorials button and under the
BlackBoard Library Awesomeness
section, you can find videos to watch &
rewatch.
4. LIBRARY ADVENTURE (1-3)
Goals of Paper – what is your research
question? What is the goal of your paper?
What are the goals of your TEAMMATE’S
papers?
Suggest keywords for each other.
Suggest subject guides to use.
Remember, it can often be helpful to use several
for slightly different approaches.
5. LIBRARY ADVENTURE (4)
Note the databases that seem most useful
for your topic, as listed in the subject guides.
(If your chosen database is not published by
EBSCO (the one we watched in class) , watching the
tutorials for that particular publisher can be
helpful and discovering advanced features of
your databases.)
6. LIBRARY ADVENTURE (5-6, 12)
If you or any of your teammates have:
physically explored the library (browsing the
area of the stacks with resources relevant to your
topic),
or logged in from off campus using research port,
used any “ask-a-librarian” features,
Please discuss and share those experiences.
7. LIBRARY ADVENTURE (7)
Compare and contrast the type of information
you find when you look for articles…
from a general database (such as Academic Search
Premiere, allowing general magazines/newspapers
in the search.)
the same database, but limited to scholarly journal
articles
databases for specifically focused on your area
(such as PsyInfo, ERIC, MedLine, MLA, CWI, etc. –
find them through your subject guide!)
from the “front page” of the library site, using the
“AOK One search” under the articles tab.
8. LIBRARY ADVENTURE (8-9)
When using your specialized database, what
was the most useful change in your search
terms? (using “AND” “OR” or “NOT”? Using
a phrase in quote marks? )
When using your specialized database, what
was the most useful “checkbox/dropdown
limiter” for your search? (Year? a
subcategory? age? Gender? type of study?
Feel free to specify something else.)
9. LIBRARY ADVENTURE (10)
) Find 2-3 scholarly articles (from journals or
specialized encyclopedias) that sound
exactly like what you’re looking for. Did they
live up to expectations? (and what were
those expectations?) If not, might they still be
useful for the paper as a point of departure,
as something to disagree with? (Be sure to
get full Bibliographic information for them.)
10. LIBRARY ADVENTURE (10 – FOR TEAMMATES)
Find 1 scholarly articles (from academic
journals) that sound exactly like what you
think each teammate is looking for.
Take turns for each topic, and everyone
share what they found.
If the target-teammate likes what you’re finding,
share your search strategy.
If your finding was off the mark, discuss why, so
everyone can get a clearer understanding of
each topic.
11. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Note that it’s due end of day, Friday, October
2
6 sources are required for the AnnoBib (but
only 4 in the final paper)
This is because you’re allowed to “reject” some
sources after your careful analysis
You may also add sources later without going
through the AnnoBib process
Read the assignment sheet carefully!
12. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRPAHY - HINTS
Summary:
If you were trying to find this source in a stack of
20, how would you describe it?
Think of what makes this source DIFFERENT
from the others.
Think of the journalist questions: Who*, What,
When, Where, Why, How.
13. MORE ON “WHO”
Note WHO is being studied. (Often studies are
done at universities on male athletes because they
are easily “standardized”- in other sections you may
evaluate how applicable the study is to other
populations)
Also note WHO is doing the studies – this is what
leads to the context analysis section.
14. ANNOBIB CONTEXT
When was this written/published? How does
that affect this article? (technology available?
Societal views? Should you be using more
recent material?
Who is the author? What affiliations do they
have?
Where was this published? What is the focus
of this journal or source?
What kind of study is this?
15. ANNOBIB ASSESS
Is this source useful for your purposes?
Think of the “trigger” and “goal” – why does it
seem the author wrote this, and what is his
or her goal for those reading it?
Do the conclusions match YOUR
interpretation of the data? (You don’t need to
be an expert, but does it feel “flaky” to you?)
16. ANNOBIB REFLECT
What are your plans for the source?
How has it changed how you think about the
topic?
What does this source now make it clear you
need to know next?
17. ANNOBIB FINAL PARAGRAPH
After you’ve found and annotated your
sources, don’t forget to review them in
context of each other.
Which was most helpful? Why?
What did you learn that was surprising?
What is your current working-thesis statement?