The document discusses Arthur Lewis's model of dual economies and its application to Asia. The Lewis model describes an economy with two sectors - a subsistence agricultural sector and a higher productivity manufacturing sector. Workers transfer from the agricultural sector to the manufacturing sector as wages equalize, driving economic growth. Eventually, a "Lewis turning point" is reached where no new workers are available and wages begin rising in both sectors, slowing growth. The document argues China may be approaching this turning point and examines implications for other Asian economies like India. It also discusses assumptions and extensions of the Lewis model over time.
The Lewis dual sector model of development describes an economy transitioning from subsistence agriculture to a more modern, urbanized structure. It consists of two sectors: a traditional subsistence sector with zero marginal productivity of labor, providing surplus labor; and a modern industrial sector where labor is transferred from the traditional sector, expanding output and employment through reinvested profits. However, the model is criticized for assuming profits are always reinvested when they could enable labor-saving investments or capital flight, and for assuming perfect competition in labor markets and unlimited surplus labor, which is inconsistent with historical evidence from developing countries.
Lewis proposed a model of economic development where a developing economy consists of two sectors: a subsistence agricultural sector and a capitalist industrial sector. Workers move from the agricultural sector with zero marginal productivity to the industrial sector with higher productivity. This increases profits in the industrial sector, fueling expansion and absorbing more agricultural workers. Eventually, wages rise in the agricultural sector as well. However, capitalist profits may not be reinvested as assumed, and other assumptions like constant wages are questionable. Overall, Lewis sought to explain how economies develop by transforming their economic structure and increasing savings and investment rates.
The classical growth theory argues that economic growth will decrease or end because of an increasing population and limited resources Classical growth theory economists believed that temporary increases in real GDP per person would cause a population explosion that would consequently decrease real GDP.
Brief review of Adam Smith's main concepts of growth.Prabha Panth
Adam Smith considered wealth of a nation to be its total output rather than just gold or agriculture. He believed economic growth increased total output, income, and standard of living. Smith argued growth occurs through increasing the division of labor, which raises productivity, and accumulating capital, which raises labor productivity by increasing the capital-labor ratio. This virtuous cycle of growth could eventually lead to a stationary state with zero growth.
The Solow-Swan model assumes constant returns to scale in production using capital and labor. It predicts an economy will reach a steady state equilibrium where the savings rate equals the investment needed to maintain the capital-labor ratio. The key assumptions include diminishing returns to individual inputs, exogenous population growth and technological progress, and savings being a constant fraction of income. The model shows how an economy converges over time to this steady state level of capital per worker and output per worker, regardless of its starting point.
This document summarizes Harrod's growth model, which argues that steady economic growth is inherently unstable due to entrepreneurs' inability to accurately predict the warranted rate of growth. It outlines Harrod's key assumptions and shows how the actual growth rate diverging from the warranted rate leads to boom/bust cycles. The model concludes that full employment steady growth is impossible to achieve due to exogenous factors like savings, technology, and population growth being rigid over time.
This document summarizes Ricardo's theory of economic growth. It states that growth occurs through capital accumulation fueled by profits. However, as growth proceeds, wages and rents increase which squeeze profits. Eventually profits fall to zero, halting further investment and growth, reaching a stationary state. The stationary state can be avoided through international trade that imports corn, preventing rising domestic corn prices from cutting into profits.
David Ricardo (1772-1823) was a British economist who developed theories such as the labor theory of value, comparative advantage, and rent. Some key points about Ricardo's theories include:
- He believed labor determines the long-run price of goods and that international trade benefits both countries based on their comparative advantages in production.
- Ricardo's theory of rent argued that landlords receive economic rent determined by crop prices rather than influencing prices themselves.
- He incorporated Malthus' theory of population growth relative to food supply into his "Iron Law of Wages," which stated wages long-run remain at subsistence level.
The Lewis dual sector model of development describes an economy transitioning from subsistence agriculture to a more modern, urbanized structure. It consists of two sectors: a traditional subsistence sector with zero marginal productivity of labor, providing surplus labor; and a modern industrial sector where labor is transferred from the traditional sector, expanding output and employment through reinvested profits. However, the model is criticized for assuming profits are always reinvested when they could enable labor-saving investments or capital flight, and for assuming perfect competition in labor markets and unlimited surplus labor, which is inconsistent with historical evidence from developing countries.
Lewis proposed a model of economic development where a developing economy consists of two sectors: a subsistence agricultural sector and a capitalist industrial sector. Workers move from the agricultural sector with zero marginal productivity to the industrial sector with higher productivity. This increases profits in the industrial sector, fueling expansion and absorbing more agricultural workers. Eventually, wages rise in the agricultural sector as well. However, capitalist profits may not be reinvested as assumed, and other assumptions like constant wages are questionable. Overall, Lewis sought to explain how economies develop by transforming their economic structure and increasing savings and investment rates.
The classical growth theory argues that economic growth will decrease or end because of an increasing population and limited resources Classical growth theory economists believed that temporary increases in real GDP per person would cause a population explosion that would consequently decrease real GDP.
Brief review of Adam Smith's main concepts of growth.Prabha Panth
Adam Smith considered wealth of a nation to be its total output rather than just gold or agriculture. He believed economic growth increased total output, income, and standard of living. Smith argued growth occurs through increasing the division of labor, which raises productivity, and accumulating capital, which raises labor productivity by increasing the capital-labor ratio. This virtuous cycle of growth could eventually lead to a stationary state with zero growth.
The Solow-Swan model assumes constant returns to scale in production using capital and labor. It predicts an economy will reach a steady state equilibrium where the savings rate equals the investment needed to maintain the capital-labor ratio. The key assumptions include diminishing returns to individual inputs, exogenous population growth and technological progress, and savings being a constant fraction of income. The model shows how an economy converges over time to this steady state level of capital per worker and output per worker, regardless of its starting point.
This document summarizes Harrod's growth model, which argues that steady economic growth is inherently unstable due to entrepreneurs' inability to accurately predict the warranted rate of growth. It outlines Harrod's key assumptions and shows how the actual growth rate diverging from the warranted rate leads to boom/bust cycles. The model concludes that full employment steady growth is impossible to achieve due to exogenous factors like savings, technology, and population growth being rigid over time.
This document summarizes Ricardo's theory of economic growth. It states that growth occurs through capital accumulation fueled by profits. However, as growth proceeds, wages and rents increase which squeeze profits. Eventually profits fall to zero, halting further investment and growth, reaching a stationary state. The stationary state can be avoided through international trade that imports corn, preventing rising domestic corn prices from cutting into profits.
David Ricardo (1772-1823) was a British economist who developed theories such as the labor theory of value, comparative advantage, and rent. Some key points about Ricardo's theories include:
- He believed labor determines the long-run price of goods and that international trade benefits both countries based on their comparative advantages in production.
- Ricardo's theory of rent argued that landlords receive economic rent determined by crop prices rather than influencing prices themselves.
- He incorporated Malthus' theory of population growth relative to food supply into his "Iron Law of Wages," which stated wages long-run remain at subsistence level.
This document summarizes the evolution of economic development theories from the 1950s to the 1990s. It describes four main strands: 1) linear stages of growth models in the 1950s-60s, 2) structural change theories in the 1970s, 3) dependency theories in the 1970s, and 4) neoclassical, free-market theories in the 1980s-90s. It outlines the economic and political context behind each period and the major ideas that emerged, such as structuralism, import substitution, neoclassical policies, and new structuralism.
Interdependence of agriculture and industrygirishpoojary1
This document discusses how industry depends on agriculture in several ways. Agriculture provides raw materials to industries like cotton to textile and oilseeds to oil industries. It also serves as a source of demand for industrial goods as people working in agriculture need items beyond food. Agriculture is a source of labor for industry as workers move from agricultural to industrial jobs as countries develop. Finally, agriculture provides food to industrial workers and is a source of funds for industry through rural savings deposits.
The Big Push Theory proposes that developing countries require a minimum threshold of investment across multiple industries to overcome issues of indivisibilities and break out of poverty. It identifies three types of indivisibilities: in production due to infrastructure needs, in demand due to small markets, and in savings due to high investment requirements. The theory argues for coordinated investment in social overhead capital and multiple industries to realize increasing returns to scale. However, it has been criticized for not providing clear guidance and overlooking constraints faced by developing countries.
The big push theory argues that economic development requires a minimum level of comprehensive investment in mutually supporting industries to take advantage of economies of scale and externalities. It identifies three types of indivisibilities - in production, demand, and savings - that must be overcome through a large investment package rather than gradual increases. Social overhead capital, like infrastructure, requires huge initial investments but leads to lower costs and indirect contributions to development over the long term. Underdeveloped countries face challenges achieving the necessary savings levels for a big push and must rely on outside sources.
This document discusses the dual gap analysis model for analyzing savings-investment gaps and foreign exchange gaps that constrain economic growth in developing countries. It explains that if a country's targeted growth rate requires higher investment than can be supported by domestic savings, there will be an ex-ante savings gap that can be filled by foreign aid inflows. Similarly, if the foreign exchange required for imports to support the targeted growth rate exceeds potential foreign exchange earnings, there will be an ex-ante foreign exchange gap that can also be filled by foreign aid. The dual gap analysis is useful for developing countries to estimate capital requirements and calculate how much investment and savings can be generated domestically versus relying on foreign resources.
Lewis proposed that less developed countries could stimulate growth by exploiting their unlimited supplies of labor. His model assumes these countries have high populations engaged in subsistence work, making labor perfectly elastic at that wage. The economies are dual, with a subsistence sector employing most workers at low productivity and a capitalist sector using capital. Growth occurs as labor moves from subsistence to capitalist sectors, increasing output and allowing reinvestment which further raises productivity and employment in a self-sustaining cycle until labor pressures subside. Bank credit can also aid capital formation though inflation is self-correcting. Critics argue the model overlooks demand factors and difficulties transitioning large agricultural populations.
This document provides an overview of Malthusian theory of economic growth. Malthus believed that population growth would outpace food production, leading to increasing poverty. He argued that population grows geometrically while food production grows arithmetically, resulting in a widening gap between the two. This "Malthusian trap" could only be escaped through population controls or negative checks like famine that reduce population levels. While criticized for its pessimism, Malthusian theory remains relevant for less developed countries with high population growth straining limited resources.
Adam Smith is considered the Father of Economics. In his seminal book, The Wealth of Nations, he argued that a country's wealth comes from the total value of goods and services produced, not just gold or agriculture. Smith identified two key drivers of economic growth: the division of labor and capital accumulation. The division of labor leads to specialization and higher productivity, while capital accumulation raises productivity by increasing capital per worker. This starts a virtuous cycle of growth, but eventually diminishing returns set in and growth slows, reaching a stationary state.
Schultz’s transformation of traditional agricultureVaibhav verma
Schultz proposes ways to transform traditional agriculture into modern agriculture. He defines traditional agriculture as occurring when technology and farmer preferences remain unchanged for long periods, resulting in equilibrium between input marginal productivities and costs. Characteristics include allocative efficiency and no zero-value labor. Schultz suggests supplying new higher-yielding factors through R&D, distribution, and extension. Farmers will demand new factors if they are profitable. The transformation process involves shifting supply and demand curves outwards to a new equilibrium with lower input prices, higher output, and returns. However, critics argue Schultz's concept is too general, ignores disguised unemployment, questions efficiency under his assumptions, and takes a command approach rather than considering farmer responsiveness
The Harrod-Domar model of economic growth extends Keynesian analysis to the long run by considering the dual effects of investment on aggregate demand and productive capacity. It seeks to determine the unique growth rate of investment and income needed to maintain full employment. The Domar version presents a fundamental growth equation showing that the increase in national income depends on the increase in capital stock multiplied by the marginal output-capital ratio. Harrod's model treats growth more dynamically, with the warranted growth rate determined by the population growth rate, output per capita based on investment level, and capital accumulation. Equilibrium is achieved when the actual incremental capital-output ratio equals the required ratio warranted by technology.
1. The document discusses the theories of balanced and unbalanced economic growth. It describes Rosenstein-Rodan's "big push" theory of balanced growth, which argues for coordinated investment across multiple industries to generate demand.
2. Nurkse's version of balanced growth stresses balancing investment between sectors to avoid bottlenecks. Hirschman's theory of unbalanced growth proposes strategically investing in certain industries to stimulate growth in other sectors through linkages.
3. Hirschman categorized investment as either social overhead capital or direct productive activities and argued that underdeveloped countries should initially focus on one type, which would then stimulate the other.
The document provides information about Naseem Shahzad and their educational qualifications. It then summarizes Lewis's two-sector model of economic development and Rostow's stages of economic growth model.
The Lewis model explains how economic growth is initiated through a structural shift as the industrial sector grows relative to subsistence agriculture. It focuses on the transfer of surplus labor from the traditional to the industrial sector. Rostow identified five stages of economic growth: traditional society, preconditions for take-off, take-off, drive to maturity, and age of high mass consumption. Developing countries are typically in the early stages of traditional society or preconditions.
The Harrod-Domer model theorizes that a country's economic growth rate is defined by its savings level and capital-output ratio. It suggests there is no natural balanced growth. The model was developed independently by Roy Harrod and Evsey Domar to explain growth in terms of savings and capital productivity. It requires continuous net investment to sustain real income and production growth. The model's assumptions include no government intervention, full initial employment, a closed economy, fixed capital-labor ratios and constant savings and interest rates. Its main criticism is the unrealistic assumption of no reason for sufficient growth to maintain full employment.
Harrod – Domar Model - Development Model.pptxNithin Kumar
The document discusses the Harrod-Domar model of economic growth developed by Roy Harrod and Evsey Domar. Some key points:
1. The model focuses on the role of capital accumulation and investment in driving economic growth.
2. It uses the capital-output ratio and investment ratio to determine the rate of economic growth.
3. Harrod identified the actual, warranted, and natural rates of growth and argued stability requires equality between these rates.
4. The warranted rate depends on capital-output ratio and savings ratio matching the demand and supply of capital.
5. The natural rate is determined by long-term factors like population and technology.
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem demonstrates that it is impossible to create a social welfare function that aggregates individual preferences into a collective social preference in a consistent, democratic manner when there are 3 or more alternatives. Arrow identified 5 criteria that any social welfare system should satisfy: collective rationality, responsiveness to individual preferences, non-imposition, non-dictatorship, and independence of irrelevant alternatives. However, his theorem showed that no voting system can simultaneously satisfy all 5 criteria. This finding challenged the notion that majority-rule voting can consistently translate individual preferences into a social ranking.
Rostow's Stages of Economic Growth: A Capitalist ApproachMd Alauddin
Rostow's Stages of Economic Growth model outlines five stages of economic development:
1) Traditional society characterized by subsistence farming and barter
2) Preconditions for take-off including development of mining and agriculture and growing acceptance of technology
3) Take-off driven by increasing industrialization, rising savings/investment, and declining agricultural employment
4) Drive to maturity where industry diversifies, technology spreads, and universal education/healthcare are established
5) Age of high mass consumption where services dominate and material wealth leads to focus on quality of life
The model views development through a capitalist lens and has been criticized for not applying well to non-Western countries.
This document discusses the vicious circle of poverty theory proposed by Nurkse, which argues that poverty is self-perpetuating because a country is poor due to its poverty. There are three reasons for the vicious circle of poverty: the supply side, where low incomes limit production; the demand side, where low incomes limit consumption; and market imperfections, where underdeveloped resources both cause and result from poverty. The document outlines remedial actions to break the cycle such as population control, increasing employment, equal income distribution, fulfilling minimum needs, and increasing agricultural development and economic growth.
This document outlines the Absolute Income Hypothesis theory presented by Keynes in 1936. The theory states that as absolute income increases, the proportion of that income spent on consumption decreases. So while consumption increases with more income, the rate of increase declines. Key points include consumption (C) increasing at a decreasing rate as income (Y) rises, the average propensity to consume (APC) decreasing as income rises, and the theory showing consumption-income relationships in both the short run and long run.
Rostow's model proposes 5 linear stages of economic growth that countries progress through:
1) Traditional society based on subsistence agriculture, 2) Preconditions for modernization as infrastructure develops and trade emerges, 3) Take-off into industrialization as workers move into manufacturing, 4) Drive to maturity as the economy diversifies through technology and innovation, 5) High mass consumption as the service sector grows and consumers demand durable goods. The model was influential but overly generalized and did not account for varying cultural and institutional factors affecting different countries' development paths.
The Harrod-Domar model theorizes that a country's economic growth rate is defined by its savings level and capital output ratio. It was developed in the 1930s-40s by British economist Roy Harrod and Russian economist Evsey Domar. The model shows that increased savings leads to increased investment, production, and capital, fueling economic growth. However, it makes unrealistic assumptions and does not account for factors like development versus just growth. The Solow-Swan model later improved on it by including capital intensity variations.
Rostow's Stages of Development outlines 5 stages of economic growth for a country: 1) Traditional society, 2) Preconditions for take-off, 3) Take-off, 4) Drive to maturity, and 5) Age of high mass consumption. The Take-Off stage involves a switch from agriculture to manufacturing, requiring technological changes and an investment rate of about 10% to develop new manufacturing sectors. The Drive to Maturity stage sees an increasingly diverse economy through continued technological innovation. While the model shows stages of economic development, critics argue it only applies to Western countries and neglects wider non-economic developments.
This document summarizes the evolution of economic development theories from the 1950s to the 1990s. It describes four main strands: 1) linear stages of growth models in the 1950s-60s, 2) structural change theories in the 1970s, 3) dependency theories in the 1970s, and 4) neoclassical, free-market theories in the 1980s-90s. It outlines the economic and political context behind each period and the major ideas that emerged, such as structuralism, import substitution, neoclassical policies, and new structuralism.
Interdependence of agriculture and industrygirishpoojary1
This document discusses how industry depends on agriculture in several ways. Agriculture provides raw materials to industries like cotton to textile and oilseeds to oil industries. It also serves as a source of demand for industrial goods as people working in agriculture need items beyond food. Agriculture is a source of labor for industry as workers move from agricultural to industrial jobs as countries develop. Finally, agriculture provides food to industrial workers and is a source of funds for industry through rural savings deposits.
The Big Push Theory proposes that developing countries require a minimum threshold of investment across multiple industries to overcome issues of indivisibilities and break out of poverty. It identifies three types of indivisibilities: in production due to infrastructure needs, in demand due to small markets, and in savings due to high investment requirements. The theory argues for coordinated investment in social overhead capital and multiple industries to realize increasing returns to scale. However, it has been criticized for not providing clear guidance and overlooking constraints faced by developing countries.
The big push theory argues that economic development requires a minimum level of comprehensive investment in mutually supporting industries to take advantage of economies of scale and externalities. It identifies three types of indivisibilities - in production, demand, and savings - that must be overcome through a large investment package rather than gradual increases. Social overhead capital, like infrastructure, requires huge initial investments but leads to lower costs and indirect contributions to development over the long term. Underdeveloped countries face challenges achieving the necessary savings levels for a big push and must rely on outside sources.
This document discusses the dual gap analysis model for analyzing savings-investment gaps and foreign exchange gaps that constrain economic growth in developing countries. It explains that if a country's targeted growth rate requires higher investment than can be supported by domestic savings, there will be an ex-ante savings gap that can be filled by foreign aid inflows. Similarly, if the foreign exchange required for imports to support the targeted growth rate exceeds potential foreign exchange earnings, there will be an ex-ante foreign exchange gap that can also be filled by foreign aid. The dual gap analysis is useful for developing countries to estimate capital requirements and calculate how much investment and savings can be generated domestically versus relying on foreign resources.
Lewis proposed that less developed countries could stimulate growth by exploiting their unlimited supplies of labor. His model assumes these countries have high populations engaged in subsistence work, making labor perfectly elastic at that wage. The economies are dual, with a subsistence sector employing most workers at low productivity and a capitalist sector using capital. Growth occurs as labor moves from subsistence to capitalist sectors, increasing output and allowing reinvestment which further raises productivity and employment in a self-sustaining cycle until labor pressures subside. Bank credit can also aid capital formation though inflation is self-correcting. Critics argue the model overlooks demand factors and difficulties transitioning large agricultural populations.
This document provides an overview of Malthusian theory of economic growth. Malthus believed that population growth would outpace food production, leading to increasing poverty. He argued that population grows geometrically while food production grows arithmetically, resulting in a widening gap between the two. This "Malthusian trap" could only be escaped through population controls or negative checks like famine that reduce population levels. While criticized for its pessimism, Malthusian theory remains relevant for less developed countries with high population growth straining limited resources.
Adam Smith is considered the Father of Economics. In his seminal book, The Wealth of Nations, he argued that a country's wealth comes from the total value of goods and services produced, not just gold or agriculture. Smith identified two key drivers of economic growth: the division of labor and capital accumulation. The division of labor leads to specialization and higher productivity, while capital accumulation raises productivity by increasing capital per worker. This starts a virtuous cycle of growth, but eventually diminishing returns set in and growth slows, reaching a stationary state.
Schultz’s transformation of traditional agricultureVaibhav verma
Schultz proposes ways to transform traditional agriculture into modern agriculture. He defines traditional agriculture as occurring when technology and farmer preferences remain unchanged for long periods, resulting in equilibrium between input marginal productivities and costs. Characteristics include allocative efficiency and no zero-value labor. Schultz suggests supplying new higher-yielding factors through R&D, distribution, and extension. Farmers will demand new factors if they are profitable. The transformation process involves shifting supply and demand curves outwards to a new equilibrium with lower input prices, higher output, and returns. However, critics argue Schultz's concept is too general, ignores disguised unemployment, questions efficiency under his assumptions, and takes a command approach rather than considering farmer responsiveness
The Harrod-Domar model of economic growth extends Keynesian analysis to the long run by considering the dual effects of investment on aggregate demand and productive capacity. It seeks to determine the unique growth rate of investment and income needed to maintain full employment. The Domar version presents a fundamental growth equation showing that the increase in national income depends on the increase in capital stock multiplied by the marginal output-capital ratio. Harrod's model treats growth more dynamically, with the warranted growth rate determined by the population growth rate, output per capita based on investment level, and capital accumulation. Equilibrium is achieved when the actual incremental capital-output ratio equals the required ratio warranted by technology.
1. The document discusses the theories of balanced and unbalanced economic growth. It describes Rosenstein-Rodan's "big push" theory of balanced growth, which argues for coordinated investment across multiple industries to generate demand.
2. Nurkse's version of balanced growth stresses balancing investment between sectors to avoid bottlenecks. Hirschman's theory of unbalanced growth proposes strategically investing in certain industries to stimulate growth in other sectors through linkages.
3. Hirschman categorized investment as either social overhead capital or direct productive activities and argued that underdeveloped countries should initially focus on one type, which would then stimulate the other.
The document provides information about Naseem Shahzad and their educational qualifications. It then summarizes Lewis's two-sector model of economic development and Rostow's stages of economic growth model.
The Lewis model explains how economic growth is initiated through a structural shift as the industrial sector grows relative to subsistence agriculture. It focuses on the transfer of surplus labor from the traditional to the industrial sector. Rostow identified five stages of economic growth: traditional society, preconditions for take-off, take-off, drive to maturity, and age of high mass consumption. Developing countries are typically in the early stages of traditional society or preconditions.
The Harrod-Domer model theorizes that a country's economic growth rate is defined by its savings level and capital-output ratio. It suggests there is no natural balanced growth. The model was developed independently by Roy Harrod and Evsey Domar to explain growth in terms of savings and capital productivity. It requires continuous net investment to sustain real income and production growth. The model's assumptions include no government intervention, full initial employment, a closed economy, fixed capital-labor ratios and constant savings and interest rates. Its main criticism is the unrealistic assumption of no reason for sufficient growth to maintain full employment.
Harrod – Domar Model - Development Model.pptxNithin Kumar
The document discusses the Harrod-Domar model of economic growth developed by Roy Harrod and Evsey Domar. Some key points:
1. The model focuses on the role of capital accumulation and investment in driving economic growth.
2. It uses the capital-output ratio and investment ratio to determine the rate of economic growth.
3. Harrod identified the actual, warranted, and natural rates of growth and argued stability requires equality between these rates.
4. The warranted rate depends on capital-output ratio and savings ratio matching the demand and supply of capital.
5. The natural rate is determined by long-term factors like population and technology.
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem demonstrates that it is impossible to create a social welfare function that aggregates individual preferences into a collective social preference in a consistent, democratic manner when there are 3 or more alternatives. Arrow identified 5 criteria that any social welfare system should satisfy: collective rationality, responsiveness to individual preferences, non-imposition, non-dictatorship, and independence of irrelevant alternatives. However, his theorem showed that no voting system can simultaneously satisfy all 5 criteria. This finding challenged the notion that majority-rule voting can consistently translate individual preferences into a social ranking.
Rostow's Stages of Economic Growth: A Capitalist ApproachMd Alauddin
Rostow's Stages of Economic Growth model outlines five stages of economic development:
1) Traditional society characterized by subsistence farming and barter
2) Preconditions for take-off including development of mining and agriculture and growing acceptance of technology
3) Take-off driven by increasing industrialization, rising savings/investment, and declining agricultural employment
4) Drive to maturity where industry diversifies, technology spreads, and universal education/healthcare are established
5) Age of high mass consumption where services dominate and material wealth leads to focus on quality of life
The model views development through a capitalist lens and has been criticized for not applying well to non-Western countries.
This document discusses the vicious circle of poverty theory proposed by Nurkse, which argues that poverty is self-perpetuating because a country is poor due to its poverty. There are three reasons for the vicious circle of poverty: the supply side, where low incomes limit production; the demand side, where low incomes limit consumption; and market imperfections, where underdeveloped resources both cause and result from poverty. The document outlines remedial actions to break the cycle such as population control, increasing employment, equal income distribution, fulfilling minimum needs, and increasing agricultural development and economic growth.
This document outlines the Absolute Income Hypothesis theory presented by Keynes in 1936. The theory states that as absolute income increases, the proportion of that income spent on consumption decreases. So while consumption increases with more income, the rate of increase declines. Key points include consumption (C) increasing at a decreasing rate as income (Y) rises, the average propensity to consume (APC) decreasing as income rises, and the theory showing consumption-income relationships in both the short run and long run.
Rostow's model proposes 5 linear stages of economic growth that countries progress through:
1) Traditional society based on subsistence agriculture, 2) Preconditions for modernization as infrastructure develops and trade emerges, 3) Take-off into industrialization as workers move into manufacturing, 4) Drive to maturity as the economy diversifies through technology and innovation, 5) High mass consumption as the service sector grows and consumers demand durable goods. The model was influential but overly generalized and did not account for varying cultural and institutional factors affecting different countries' development paths.
The Harrod-Domar model theorizes that a country's economic growth rate is defined by its savings level and capital output ratio. It was developed in the 1930s-40s by British economist Roy Harrod and Russian economist Evsey Domar. The model shows that increased savings leads to increased investment, production, and capital, fueling economic growth. However, it makes unrealistic assumptions and does not account for factors like development versus just growth. The Solow-Swan model later improved on it by including capital intensity variations.
Rostow's Stages of Development outlines 5 stages of economic growth for a country: 1) Traditional society, 2) Preconditions for take-off, 3) Take-off, 4) Drive to maturity, and 5) Age of high mass consumption. The Take-Off stage involves a switch from agriculture to manufacturing, requiring technological changes and an investment rate of about 10% to develop new manufacturing sectors. The Drive to Maturity stage sees an increasingly diverse economy through continued technological innovation. While the model shows stages of economic development, critics argue it only applies to Western countries and neglects wider non-economic developments.
Development requires sustained effort over long periods and involves changes. Economic growth refers to increases in output or production, while economic development also includes changes to production arrangements. Development in humans and countries involves not just physical increases but also changes to attitudes, habits, and intelligence/institutions to become mature. Economic development is characterized by sustained output increases, widespread structural changes, and growth in efficiency shaped by non-economic factors.
Models of Development propose ways to understand how countries develop economically. One approach is Rostow's Stages of Growth model, which places countries into five categories of development: 1) Traditional Society, 2) Preconditions for Take-Off, 3) Take-Off, 4) Drive to Maturity, and 5) High Mass Consumption. The stages involve shifts from agriculture to industry and increasing technological advancement and investment. Understanding models of development can help identify strategies to promote economic growth in countries.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Human Development Index (HDI) and provides related data. The HDI measures development by combining indicators of life expectancy, education, and income. It discusses the components of the HDI - health (life expectancy), education (mean years of schooling and expected years), and standard of living (GNI per capita). Tables then rank countries by their HDI values and provide country-level data on the components. Other tables analyze inequality-adjusted HDI values and gender inequality.
This is a quick overview on the role of analytics, insights and big-data as it redefines competitive advantage and strategic management in modern corporations.
EUODA and Early Stage Venture Capital Investment in Biopharmaceutical IndustryChirantan Chatterjee
1) The study finds that the EU Orphan Drug Act (EUODA) increased early stage venture capital investments in biopharmaceutical subfields by 3-5% relative to control subfields, translating to about 2000 new early-stage investments.
2) EUODA also had regulatory spillover effects, helping US venture capitalists more than EU venture capitalists and increasing cross-border venture investing.
3) While EUODA lowered syndication activity for early stage investments, it did not decrease the average amount raised per investment round.
4) EUODA improved exit performance for treated firms, resulting in more initial public offerings than acquisitions and no significant effect on bankruptcies.
Access, Innovation & Public Policy in Healthcare Markets ICICI Bank Chair L...Chirantan Chatterjee
The document summarizes past research conducted by Chirantan Chatterjee. It discusses research on balancing access to healthcare and innovation incentives, the welfare effects of differential drug pricing in India, cartels in the Indian drug market, the role of physicians in irrational drug use in India, and the diffusion of universal healthcare coverage in India influenced by spatial peer effects. The ongoing research covers topics like the market response to pandemics, experiments on women's risks in buying fairness creams, and the effects of price controls in the Indian malaria drug market. The document acknowledges funding support and concludes by thanking the audience and posing open questions.
This document provides a summary of Chirantan Chatterjee's background and research interests. It outlines his educational and professional background, including receiving a PhD in applied economics from Carnegie Mellon University. It then summarizes some of his past research papers covering topics like pharmaceutical markets in India and the US, universal health coverage, and the role of physicians in India. It lists some of his current research projects and notes his openness to collaborating on new projects related to health issues in India like mental health, health technology, and public drug policy.
1) The document discusses balancing access to medicines with innovation, noting that one size may not fit all situations given contingencies in therapeutic markets.
2) It presents perspectives from Adam Smith, Muhammad Yunus, and Hart & Zingales on firms and entrepreneurs having non-profit motives and needing to consider social dimensions.
3) Alternative approaches to patents are discussed, such as priority review vouchers, advance market commitments, and innovation prizes, as well as the roles of venture capital and complementary health infrastructure.
4) The document concludes by framing the issue as responsible firms needing to converge with responsible social planners to find welfare-maximizing solutions, as depicted in a two-by-two matrix
Panel Moderator & Discussant - Paul Janssen TB Symposium (CSIR-IMTECH)Chirantan Chatterjee
This document summarizes a panel discussion on tuberculosis. It provides an overview of tuberculosis trends globally from 2009-2015, noting both improvements and ongoing challenges. Specifically, while prevalence is decreasing, every 18 seconds someone still dies from TB. Further, only a small portion of those in need received two newer, more effective medicines to treat drug-resistant TB. The document also discusses the high costs of treating multi-drug resistant TB and questions around access to new treatments, including how public health and the roles of innovators, policymakers, and providers can help achieve global tuberculosis treatment targets by 2025 in countries like India.
This document discusses the concept of innovationism. It defines innovation as the introduction of new goods, improved production methods, new markets, new supply sources, or better organization as defined by economist Joseph Schumpeter. It explores who innovates, including the public and private sectors, large firms and entrepreneurs, individuals and teams. Models of innovation discussed include the linear model, the relationship between firm size and innovation, Pasteur's Quadrant, democratizing innovation, and the location of innovation. The document also addresses innovationism for organizations through tools like innovation audits and metrics, and platforms to incentivize innovation. It wraps up with a discussion of responsible innovationism and the economic history of innovation.
The document discusses healthcare in India and the concept of the Peltzman Effect. It introduces the story of three characters - Bob, Anne, and Carla - to represent different groups in Indian healthcare. It then discusses different philosophical views of justice as they relate to healthcare and notes that no single system can satisfy all views. The document outlines producer-side, consumer-side, and regulator-side Peltzman Effects in Indian healthcare. It proposes monitoring evidence to learn and maintain flexibility to hybridize approaches as seen in examples from Mass General, Hiranandani, Portea/Practo, and Novartis/MHE. The presentation concludes by noting there will be more discussion on these topics in an
The document discusses the concept of disruption in business. It defines disruption as a theory of business failure caused by new entrants or technologies. Disruption can occur through lower-cost business models or new markets. The document notes that disruption is closely related to industry evolution. It provides examples of how core competencies, competitive advantages, and organizational forms are changing for businesses facing disruption. Finally, it raises questions about how incumbent firms should respond to disruption and the challenges they may face.
China has experienced rapid economic growth over recent decades, transitioning from a largely agricultural economy to an industrial and commercial powerhouse. However, this growth has also created new challenges for China relating to inequality, environmental degradation, and regional economic disparities. As China's economy continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether the country can manage these issues and maintain economic momentum, or if weaknesses could potentially constrain future growth.
This document discusses the economics of ideas, focusing on non-rivalrous and excludable goods like ideas. It introduces the concepts of rivalrous vs. non-rivalrous goods and how ideas are non-rivalrous but can be made excludable. This gives rise to increasing returns and imperfect competition in markets for ideas. The document also presents a basic Romer-style model of endogenous growth driven by increasing returns from new ideas. It questions whether growth will continue indefinitely and discusses challenges to US growth from factors like demographics, debt, and environmental constraints.
Global Pharmaceutical R&D - Some Political Economy & Public Policy Considerat...Chirantan Chatterjee
Invited Lecture for Canadian Institutes of Health Research & Karnataka Health Promotion Trust's International Infectious Disease & Global Health Training Program
This document discusses various frameworks for strategic thinking for hospital CXOs. It summarizes Porter's 5 forces model and the resource-based view of the firm. It also discusses the importance of resources, capabilities, and focusing strategy. Disruptive innovation and examples from the Indian pharmaceutical industry are provided. Overall, the key points are that both industry structure and a firm's unique resources influence strategy, and strategy must consider focusing capabilities and disruptions in the industry.
Indian Economy & Business (Skyped Lecture U-Tokyo Graduate Students)Chirantan Chatterjee
This document discusses India's economic growth and transformation. It notes that while India was growing rapidly and seen as competing with China, its growth has slowed in recent years. It attributes this partly to global slowdown but mainly to structural issues as "the low hanging fruits being gone." It argues that India now needs structural transformation, including addressing sub-national heterogeneity and institutional voids. It highlights some positive factors like a young workforce, entrepreneurship, and sunrise industries, but says more needs to be done in areas like governance, education, and policy consistency to help facilitate India's continued economic development.
This document discusses the transformation of the global biopharmaceutical industry from small-molecule chemistry drugs to large-molecule biological drugs due to advances in basic science. It focuses on the implications for the Indian bio-pharmaceutical industry. Analysis shows Indian firms have weak innovation and science capabilities for large molecules. Firm interviews revealed issues with human capital, competition, and regulation. Econometric analysis of regional drug demand in India found that domestic firms can produce more, charge lower prices than MNCs, and early movers gain market share through greater variety. The industry needs more investment in bio-science human capital and resolution of regulatory uncertainty to succeed in developing large molecule drugs.
Quality (not dirty) medicines - The Way Ahead for Indian PharmaChirantan Chatterjee
This document summarizes a presentation given by Chirantan Chatterjee at an IIM-Bangalore workshop on improving the consumer interface of pharmaceutical and private healthcare in India. The presentation discusses several issues with India's pharmaceutical industry and regulatory system, including having different standards for domestic and export markets, a lack of evidence-based regulation, and differences across regions. It provides examples of initiatives in Gujarat that have helped improve traceability, transparency and oversight. The presentation concludes by calling for the country to address existing issues and shortcomings rather than being complacent, in order to better protect public health.
1) The document discusses various international trade models including absolute advantage, comparative advantage, and the Heckscher-Ohlin model.
2) It examines the Heckscher-Ohlin model in depth, outlining its key ideas including the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, Rybczynski theorem, and factor price equalization.
3) The Heckscher-Ohlin model predicts that countries will export goods that intensively use their abundant factors of production and import goods that intensively use their scarce factors.
On Market-Boundaries in Pharmaceutical Sector (at Competition Commission of I...Chirantan Chatterjee
The document discusses thinking creatively about product markets in the pharmaceutical industry. It begins by outlining some key considerations, such as the role of physicians and regulators. It then discusses different market structures and how defining the appropriate market boundary is important but challenging. The document emphasizes that market definition depends on the specific question and data available. It provides examples of how to conceptualize product markets using classification codes like ATC and Ephrama at different levels of granularity.
Physiology and chemistry of skin and pigmentation, hairs, scalp, lips and nail, Cleansing cream, Lotions, Face powders, Face packs, Lipsticks, Bath products, soaps and baby product,
Preparation and standardization of the following : Tonic, Bleaches, Dentifrices and Mouth washes & Tooth Pastes, Cosmetics for Nails.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
11. Lewis Model – Graphical Intuition
APLag
MPLag
MPLag
APLag
Lag
11
12. Lewis’ Key Idea: Agriculture Interacts w/Manufacturing with different
principles.
APLag
MPLag
MPLmfg
MPLag
APLag
Lag
Lmfg
Rural sector was allocating output equally, using AP
Mfg. sector used the marginal-principle.
MP-Lmfg vs. AP-Lag.
12
17. Highest Level of Output one can obtain?
APLag
MPLag
MPLmfg
APLag
L1
17
18. Wage Rate is Lower @ Highest Output Point
APLag
MPLag
MPLmfg
MPLag
L
APLag
L1
18
19. Manufacturing Hires More Agriculture in Equilibrium
APLag
MPLag
MPLmfg
MPLag
Lag
L
APLag
L1
Lmfg
Rural workers now accept less than their previous wage rate.
MP-Lag moves back up in the process of re-allocation.
“Go to the city young person”!
19
21. Wage Rate is Lower @ Highest Output Point
APLag
MPLag
MPLmfg
MPLag
L
APLag
L1
21
22. Lewis Turning Point
APLag
MPLag
MPLmfg
MPLag
L
APLag
L1
A Point Comes when Rural Workers are no longer going to work at
Lower Wage Rates. Discontent!
No more labor forthcoming, wages start rising again.
Output growth slows down
Shades of Solowian Convergence (but with more than 1 sector in the
model) ?
22
24. China is witnessing a Lewisian Turning Point?
Not Yet – But Maybe by 2020-2025
What About India/Japan? Great Research Project
How to slow the reaching of a turning point?
Rings a Bell with Asian Financial Crisis?
24
25. Before we go ahead, assumptions made by Lewis?
25
26. Before we go ahead, assumptions made by Lewis?
1) What about Lag+Lmfg=Population?
2) What about Agricultural shifting to MP from AP-paradigm?
3) How about Rural Employment Guarantee Schemes?
4) What about technology (from heaven or otherwise) in
manufacturing?
5) What about interest rates?
26
27. Lewis was not alone
Other Economists like Kaldor & Harrod-Domar model
considered dual-sectors.
Ranis and Fai mathematically improved this model.
But Lewis’ work triggered lots of work in micro-development
economics.
The basic question: How can you improve the lives of poor to
prevent their migration? Structural Changes.
Peer-paper
for
example:
https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=IIO
27
28. Did Japan ever reach a turning point?
1) Open Question.
2) But it certainly had a very robust and vibrant though protected
non-export sector.
3) Dragging down overall productivity & growth of the economy.
4) Efforts are on to structurally address this dual-economy in Japan.
5) Let’s finish our round-up of Japan.
28
Editor's Notes
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.
Take a radically simplified view of the world. Look at a single economy, at a point in time. Only two goods produced: food and machines.
PPF describes combinations of food and machines that can be produced as resources of the economy are shifted from food industry to machine industry. At each point, slope of the line tells us how much more food we get by sacrificing a unit of machines, and vice versa.
Value of production depends on prices. GDP in this simple framework is simply=PmQm+PfQf.
For any given set of prices, Pf and Pm, value of GDP will be maximized when economy produces at the point where ratio of prices is tangent to PPF, at Q1. You can see this graphically. As you move to left, you sacrifice too much food for an extra bit of machines, given what food is worth. As you move to the right, you give up too many machines for a unit of food, given what machines are worth. Only at the point where slope of PPF is same as ratio of relative prices are you sacrificing food for machines at a ratio that reflects the relative value of these two goods.