Latin NCAP: 5 years of progress
ALEJANDRO FURAS
Latin NCAP Secretary General
Global NCAP Technical Director
16th
May 2016
Delhi, India
Latin NCAP
Automobile
Clubs
Consumer
Organizations
Road Safety
NGO’s
Insurance
organizations
Governments
Latin NCAP timeline
2010 2011 2013 2014
First Latin NCAP
publication in MVD
New protcol Adult and Child:
- Frontal and Side
- 5 stars Adult:
Pole, ESC, SBR.
- ESC needed for 4 stars
2009
First Latin
NCAP meeting,
Rio 2009
2012 2015 2016
Publication in SP.
Publication in ARG.
FIRST B segment 4 stars
New protocol Adult.
First 5 stars. First A
segment 5 estrellas
New Child protocol.
First 5 stars Child.
LEGAL ENTITY
BRASILIA. Legal entity
established and
accredited
Latin NCAP rated more than 70 vehicles
Latin NCAP rated more than 70 vehicles
We warned about models with poor safety levels
And that structures are vital to offer an acceptable protection
Latin NCAP warned that “only airbags” is not enough
Latin NCAP recommended to governments to adopt UN regulations
UN94 (frontal impact) - UN95 (side impact)
Latin NCAP compared models:
Models that look the same like in other regions but they
perform differently under the same crash test conditions
Latin NCAP rated more than 70 vehicles
Showed the good results
Suzuki Celerio + 2 Airbags
64
km/h
Volkswagen up! + 2 Airbags
DriverFront Passenger
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Weak
Poor
It is possible to produce affordable and safe cars
It is possible to produce affordable and safe cars
Volkswagen up! + 2 Airbags
64
km/h
64
km/h
Latin NCAP Timeline
How do we do it…
Corazon
Injury criteria
56 km/h56 km/h 64 km/h64 km/h
UN-R94
We are all humans, and certain crash conditions
will cause on all of us the same effect.
PASS
FAIL
Injury levels
Areas analisis driver / passenger
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Weak
Poor
Head
Neck
Chest
Pelvis
Femur
Knee
Lower Leg
Head injury
Head
Just below UN Regulation acceptance
readings = zero points for the head
colour RED
Full integrity = FOUR points (full points)
for the head and colour GREEN
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Weak
Poor
Full integrity = FOUR points
Just below UN integrity acceptance = ZERO points
56 km/h56 km/h 64 km/h64 km/hUN-R94
We are all humans, and certain crash conditions
will cause on all of us the same effect.
PASS
FAIL
Injury levels (head example)
Ca
Car B
Frontal Crash Protection
Car C
56 km/h56 km/h
Frontal Crash test: UN Regulation vs Latin NCAP
UN-R94
64 km/h64 km/h
Result: Pass or Fail Result:
Use the SAME injury criteria
55km/h
55km/h
Ca
Car C
Car B
Frontal Crash assessment (NCAP 64km/h)
Testing at 64km/h we want to replicate the effect in
the car as it would have been involved in this crash:
64 km/h
Latin NCAP (2015)
64 km/h
Pole
Side Whiplash
Pedestrian
(One Single star rating)
ESC
AEB
Euro NCAP
SAME performance/score criteria
PER TEST
2015
Relationship with Manufacturers
Amount of models tested per Brand
Average Adult star rating
Average Child star rating
Manufacturers’ reaction
Manufacturers
Manufacturers
Latin NCAP recommendation
Adopt UN94 regulation – Oct 2017
Develop a local NCAP to test at 64 km/h
and inform consumers which car performs better at
higher speeds than regulatinos
www.latinncap.com
Muchas Gracias por su atención

Latin NCAP: 5 Years of Progress

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Read slide
  • #8 Read slide
  • #10 Read slide
  • #11 Read slide
  • #18 The crash test is a frontal offset (40%) test. It is a structure test (ECE94) against a deformable barrier.
  • #19 Read slide
  • #20 Read slide
  • #21 The crash test is a frontal offset (40%) test. It is a structure test (ECE94) against a deformable barrier.
  • #23 The crash test is a frontal offset (40%) test. It is a structure test (ECE94) against a deformable barrier.
  • #25 Read slide
  • #26 Read slide
  • #27 Read slide