Cost & ManagementAccounting
-B.V.Raghunandan, SVS College, Bantwal
 Direct Labour
 Indirect Labour
 Labour Cost Control
 Personnel Department
 Production or Engineering
Department
 Time Keeping Department
A.Time Recording
B.Time Booking
 Manual Methods:
-Attendance Register
-Disc System
 Mechanical Methods
-Time Recording Clock
- DialTime Recorder
 Electronic Devices
- Swipe Card
- Bio-Metrics
 Time Booking is tracing the time
spent by the worker and
identifying such time to jobs,
processes or operation so as to
calculate the wage cost of such
processes, jobs or operations
 Ascertainment of Labour Cost
 Control of IdleTime
 Determining Overhead
Absorption Rate
 Evaluating Performance of
Workers
 Determining Performance Bonus
 DailyTime Sheets
 WeeklyTime Sheets
 JobTickets
 Job Cards
DailyTime Sheet
Name: Date:
Clock Card No. Week No.
Machine No. Cost Centre.
Work
Order
No. Description
Work
Done
Time
Hours
Started Finished
Workers’ Signature Foreman’s Signature Cost Office Reference
WeeklyTime Sheet
Name: Date:
Clock card No. Week Ending:
Cost Centre/Department:
Day Job No. Description Time Total Hours For Cost Office
Start Finish Normal OT Rate Amount
Worker’s Signature Foreman’s Signature Cost Office Ref:
 IdleTime is the difference between
the time for which payment is made
and the actual time worked.
 It is the time during which the
worker did not engage himself in
productive work
Avoidable Causes
Unavoidable Causes
 Failure of Power Supply
 Breakdown of Machinery
 Non-Availability of Material
 Strike
 Lock-out
 Natural Calamities
 Setting-upTime
 Movement from Gate to Production
Floor
 Movement from One Job to Another
 Time toTake Instruction
 Tea-Breaks
 Personal Needs
 Minor Accidents
 Seasonality of Industry
 Work Carried on Beyond Normal Hours
 Double the Rate of Payment
 Should be Avoided
 Normal Causes OT –charged to the
concerned Job or Batch
 Abnormal Causes OT-transferred to Costing
Profit and Loss account
 Only on Proper Authorisation
 Completion of a Rush Order
 Meeting a sudden spurt in demand
 Completion of a DelayedWork
 Making up for Loss of Production
due to Accidents, Flood or Other
Natural Calamities
 The rate at which the employees are leaving
the organisation in a year
 Also known as Attrition rate
 In IT industry, it was as high as 26-30% in
2007- It has come down to 12-16% in 2009
 It is unhealthy for the organisation
 It should be reduced as much as possible
through constant enquiry
 Separation Rate =
 Replacement Rate
 Labour Flux Rate
100
ker
.
X
sberofWorAverageNum
sLeavingofEmployeeNo
100
ker
Re
X
sberofWorAverageNum
placedNo

100
ker
Re...
X
sberofWorAverageNum
placementofNoLeavingNo 

Avoidable Causes
Unavoidable Causes
 LowWages
 Working
Conditions
 Labour Relation
 Trade Union
Rivalry
 No Job
Satisfaction
 Lack ofTraining
 BadWorking
Hours
 Lack of Incentives
 No Welfare
Measures
 Lack of Job
Security
 Unfair Promotion
 Supervisory Staff
 Death, Retirement or Disablement
 Marriage or Pregnancy in case ofWomen
 Better Career Opportunities
 Retrenchment
 Termination
 Change of Place ofWork
 Change for BetterWorking Environment
 Domestic Responsibilities
 HigherWages
 BetterWelfare Measures
 BetterTraining
 BetterWorking Conditions
 Retirement Benefits
 Recruitment Cost
 Cost ofTraining
 VacancyTime Gap and Loss of Output
 AdjustmentTime for the NewWorkers
 Loss of Quality
 Strain onTools & Equipment
 Higher Scarp and DefectiveWork
 Proper
Recruitment
 GoodTraining
 FairWages
 GoodWorking
Conditions
 Labour Amenities
 LabourWelfare
 Building up Loyalty
 Improving the Skills
 Improving Relations
 Communication of
Policies
 GrievancesCell
 Workers’
Participation in
Management
 GuaranteedWage
 Uniformity
 Connected to CPI
 Recognition of
Efficiency
 Incentive for Hard
Work
 Equality
 Clarity
 Progressive Scale
 Consistency
 Flexibility
 Simplicity
 Fairness
 High Level of
Morale
 Viability of
operation
 Time Rate
 Piece Rate
 Taylor’s Differential Piece Rates
 Halsey’s Incentive Plan
 Rowan’s Incentive Plan
 Wages are paid for theTime spent on
the job
 Output is irrelevant
 Rate per Hour. Per Day, or per Month
 Suitable when Quality of work is
important
 Trade Unions prefer this method
 Monthly Payment goes with other
allowances
 Simplicity
 Easier Computation
 Encourages Skill Development
 GuaranteedWages
 Minimum Loss to Material and Equipmnets
 Equality ofWages
 TeamWork
 Cordial Relation among theWorkers
 Support ofTrade Unions
 Abilities are not Differentiated
 No Incentive for HardWork
 Requires Supervision
 Dissatisfaction of Efficient Workers
 Low Morale
 No Punishment for Inefficiency
 Labour Cost is not a variable cost under
this system
 TotalWages =TT XTR whereTT =TimeTaken
TR =Time Rate
 Rate per unit of output
 Output decides the wages payable
 A standard time is taken and the
standard output is determined
 TimeWages for the standard output
determines the piece rate
 Efficiency is recognised
 Motivates the workers
 Reduces labour cost per unit
 Labour cost is variable
 Computation of labour cost in advance
is easy
 Lesser Supervision
 Less IdleTime
 Piece Rate =
 TotalWages = Output X Piece Rate
dardOutputS
TimeWages
tan
 Quality suffers
 Difficulty of Fixing the standard output and
Piece Rate
 More scrap and DefectiveWork
 Damage toTools and Equipment
 No GuaranteedWages
 Uncertainty in Income
 Trade Unions Oppose the System
 Two Piece Rates: Low Piece Rate and High
 No GuaranteedWages
 StandardOutput is fixed onTime and Motion
Study
 Low Piece Rate at 83% of standard piece rate
for output below standard
 High Piece Rate at 175% of standard piece
rate for output above standard
 Increases Efficiency and Motivates the
Worker ensuring a high level of morale
 Differentiates among workers leading to bad
labour relation
 Detailed records are to be maintained
regarding the output of the workers
 Demoralises human values
 For time taken, wages are paid
under time rate
 A standard time is fixed in advance
 For the time saved, 50% of time
wages is paid as bonus
 Remaining 50% goes to supervisor
or management
TotalWages=TimeWages + Bonus
=TT XTR + [TS XTR x 50%] where
TT =TimeTaken
TR =Time Rate
TS =Time Saved
 Easy understandability
 Guaranteed time rate irrespective of the
efficiency
 Incentive in the form of bonus for time saved
 Workers can evaluate their own performance
on the basis of actual time taken against
standard time
 Management also shares the benefit leading
to better investment in tools & equipment
 Quality may suffer
 Workers would drive themselves at top speed
leading to tension
 Lack of team work as each worker will
concentrate upon finishing his work at the
earliest
 Wastage of material and more scrap
 Tools would be subject to strain as they may
be carelessly handled
 Similar to Halsey’s Plan
 Guarantee of time wages
 Bonus for time saved
 Standard time is predetermined
 The bonus is in the proportion of time saved
to standard time
 Quantum of bonus depends upon the time
saved
 Management enjoys the remaining value of
time saved
 TotalWages =TimeWages + Bonus
=TT XTR + [TS XTR X
whereTT =TimeTaken
TR =Time Rate
TS =Time Saved
ST = StandardTime
]
TS
TT
Labour cost control b.v.raghunandan

Labour cost control b.v.raghunandan

  • 1.
  • 2.
     Direct Labour Indirect Labour  Labour Cost Control  Personnel Department  Production or Engineering Department  Time Keeping Department
  • 3.
  • 4.
     Manual Methods: -AttendanceRegister -Disc System  Mechanical Methods -Time Recording Clock - DialTime Recorder  Electronic Devices - Swipe Card - Bio-Metrics
  • 12.
     Time Bookingis tracing the time spent by the worker and identifying such time to jobs, processes or operation so as to calculate the wage cost of such processes, jobs or operations
  • 13.
     Ascertainment ofLabour Cost  Control of IdleTime  Determining Overhead Absorption Rate  Evaluating Performance of Workers  Determining Performance Bonus
  • 14.
     DailyTime Sheets WeeklyTime Sheets  JobTickets  Job Cards
  • 15.
    DailyTime Sheet Name: Date: ClockCard No. Week No. Machine No. Cost Centre. Work Order No. Description Work Done Time Hours Started Finished Workers’ Signature Foreman’s Signature Cost Office Reference
  • 16.
    WeeklyTime Sheet Name: Date: Clockcard No. Week Ending: Cost Centre/Department: Day Job No. Description Time Total Hours For Cost Office Start Finish Normal OT Rate Amount Worker’s Signature Foreman’s Signature Cost Office Ref:
  • 17.
     IdleTime isthe difference between the time for which payment is made and the actual time worked.  It is the time during which the worker did not engage himself in productive work
  • 18.
  • 19.
     Failure ofPower Supply  Breakdown of Machinery  Non-Availability of Material  Strike  Lock-out  Natural Calamities
  • 20.
     Setting-upTime  Movementfrom Gate to Production Floor  Movement from One Job to Another  Time toTake Instruction  Tea-Breaks  Personal Needs  Minor Accidents  Seasonality of Industry
  • 21.
     Work Carriedon Beyond Normal Hours  Double the Rate of Payment  Should be Avoided  Normal Causes OT –charged to the concerned Job or Batch  Abnormal Causes OT-transferred to Costing Profit and Loss account  Only on Proper Authorisation
  • 22.
     Completion ofa Rush Order  Meeting a sudden spurt in demand  Completion of a DelayedWork  Making up for Loss of Production due to Accidents, Flood or Other Natural Calamities
  • 23.
     The rateat which the employees are leaving the organisation in a year  Also known as Attrition rate  In IT industry, it was as high as 26-30% in 2007- It has come down to 12-16% in 2009  It is unhealthy for the organisation  It should be reduced as much as possible through constant enquiry
  • 24.
     Separation Rate=  Replacement Rate  Labour Flux Rate 100 ker . X sberofWorAverageNum sLeavingofEmployeeNo 100 ker Re X sberofWorAverageNum placedNo  100 ker Re... X sberofWorAverageNum placementofNoLeavingNo  
  • 25.
  • 26.
     LowWages  Working Conditions Labour Relation  Trade Union Rivalry  No Job Satisfaction  Lack ofTraining  BadWorking Hours  Lack of Incentives  No Welfare Measures  Lack of Job Security  Unfair Promotion  Supervisory Staff
  • 27.
     Death, Retirementor Disablement  Marriage or Pregnancy in case ofWomen  Better Career Opportunities  Retrenchment  Termination  Change of Place ofWork  Change for BetterWorking Environment  Domestic Responsibilities
  • 28.
     HigherWages  BetterWelfareMeasures  BetterTraining  BetterWorking Conditions  Retirement Benefits
  • 29.
     Recruitment Cost Cost ofTraining  VacancyTime Gap and Loss of Output  AdjustmentTime for the NewWorkers  Loss of Quality  Strain onTools & Equipment  Higher Scarp and DefectiveWork
  • 30.
     Proper Recruitment  GoodTraining FairWages  GoodWorking Conditions  Labour Amenities  LabourWelfare  Building up Loyalty  Improving the Skills  Improving Relations  Communication of Policies  GrievancesCell  Workers’ Participation in Management
  • 31.
     GuaranteedWage  Uniformity Connected to CPI  Recognition of Efficiency  Incentive for Hard Work  Equality  Clarity  Progressive Scale  Consistency  Flexibility  Simplicity  Fairness  High Level of Morale  Viability of operation
  • 32.
     Time Rate Piece Rate  Taylor’s Differential Piece Rates  Halsey’s Incentive Plan  Rowan’s Incentive Plan
  • 33.
     Wages arepaid for theTime spent on the job  Output is irrelevant  Rate per Hour. Per Day, or per Month  Suitable when Quality of work is important  Trade Unions prefer this method  Monthly Payment goes with other allowances
  • 34.
     Simplicity  EasierComputation  Encourages Skill Development  GuaranteedWages  Minimum Loss to Material and Equipmnets  Equality ofWages  TeamWork  Cordial Relation among theWorkers  Support ofTrade Unions
  • 35.
     Abilities arenot Differentiated  No Incentive for HardWork  Requires Supervision  Dissatisfaction of Efficient Workers  Low Morale  No Punishment for Inefficiency  Labour Cost is not a variable cost under this system
  • 36.
     TotalWages =TTXTR whereTT =TimeTaken TR =Time Rate
  • 37.
     Rate perunit of output  Output decides the wages payable  A standard time is taken and the standard output is determined  TimeWages for the standard output determines the piece rate
  • 38.
     Efficiency isrecognised  Motivates the workers  Reduces labour cost per unit  Labour cost is variable  Computation of labour cost in advance is easy  Lesser Supervision  Less IdleTime
  • 39.
     Piece Rate=  TotalWages = Output X Piece Rate dardOutputS TimeWages tan
  • 40.
     Quality suffers Difficulty of Fixing the standard output and Piece Rate  More scrap and DefectiveWork  Damage toTools and Equipment  No GuaranteedWages  Uncertainty in Income  Trade Unions Oppose the System
  • 41.
     Two PieceRates: Low Piece Rate and High  No GuaranteedWages  StandardOutput is fixed onTime and Motion Study  Low Piece Rate at 83% of standard piece rate for output below standard  High Piece Rate at 175% of standard piece rate for output above standard
  • 42.
     Increases Efficiencyand Motivates the Worker ensuring a high level of morale  Differentiates among workers leading to bad labour relation  Detailed records are to be maintained regarding the output of the workers  Demoralises human values
  • 43.
     For timetaken, wages are paid under time rate  A standard time is fixed in advance  For the time saved, 50% of time wages is paid as bonus  Remaining 50% goes to supervisor or management
  • 44.
    TotalWages=TimeWages + Bonus =TTXTR + [TS XTR x 50%] where TT =TimeTaken TR =Time Rate TS =Time Saved
  • 45.
     Easy understandability Guaranteed time rate irrespective of the efficiency  Incentive in the form of bonus for time saved  Workers can evaluate their own performance on the basis of actual time taken against standard time  Management also shares the benefit leading to better investment in tools & equipment
  • 46.
     Quality maysuffer  Workers would drive themselves at top speed leading to tension  Lack of team work as each worker will concentrate upon finishing his work at the earliest  Wastage of material and more scrap  Tools would be subject to strain as they may be carelessly handled
  • 47.
     Similar toHalsey’s Plan  Guarantee of time wages  Bonus for time saved  Standard time is predetermined  The bonus is in the proportion of time saved to standard time  Quantum of bonus depends upon the time saved  Management enjoys the remaining value of time saved
  • 48.
     TotalWages =TimeWages+ Bonus =TT XTR + [TS XTR X whereTT =TimeTaken TR =Time Rate TS =Time Saved ST = StandardTime ] TS TT