Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Khi 052 revised dt report
Similar to Khi 052 revised dt report (20)
More from Shiraz316
More from Shiraz316 (16)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (9)
Khi 052 revised dt report
- 1. Wi tribe LTE TDD Project Single Site Verification Test Report Site ID KHI 052
- 2. Engineering Parameter Verification Used Tools Drive Test Tool Genex Probe V3R17C00 Analysis Tool Genex Assistant V3R17C00 Item Check list Sector A Sector B Sector C Engineer Parameter Antenna height(m) 30 29 30 Antenna azimuth 30 160 260 Mechanical tilt 2 2 2 Electrical tilt fix fix Variable Basic configuration PCI 279 280 281 eNodeB Model DBS3900 Site Configuration S111 Spectrum Used (DL/UL) 3520.25 – 3541.25 MHz Channel Bandwidth 20 MHz EARFCN 43327
- 3. SSV Summary Test Scenario Target Value Sector A Sector B Sector C Average Maximum Average Maximum Average Maximum Average Maximum DL Throughput (20MHz) Near Point 75 Mbps 85 Mbps 25.8 39.3 27.7 34.4 42.6 64.4 Far Point NA NA 21.6 25.9 21.7 30.7 31.2 34.0 UL Throughput (20Mhz) Near Point 6.5 Mbps 9 Mbps 6.2 6.6 6.3 6.7 8.9 9.1 Far Point NA NA 2.1 3.2 2.4 4.8 1.1 2.5 Avg. Latency (32 Bytes) 35ms 36ms 38ms 36ms AVG.Latency(128 Bytes) 46ms 44ms 41ms Static Test Results: DT KPIs: DT KPI Target Value Achieved Value RRC Setup Success Rate 98% 100% ERAB Setup Success Rate 98% 100% Handoff Success Rate 98% NA Service Drop Rate 2% 0% Conditions: 5min Static test with below conditions and get the Peak & average throughput by DU meter: 1) Near Point: RSRP>-80 and SINR= >25 dB 2) Subframe Assignment = SA2 3) Special Subframe Pattern = SSP6 4) Any limitation of transmission should be excluded. 5) Any Non Huawei Equipment issue should be excluded 6) Core network delay should be less than 3ms to achieve latency <35ms 7) Server should be connected to PGW directly to achieve latency <35ms
- 4. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Near Point Average DL Throughput Sector A
- 5. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Near Point Average UL Throughput Sector A
- 6. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Far Point Average DL Throughput Sector A
- 7. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Far Point Average UL Throughput Sector A
- 8. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Near Point Average DL Throughput Sector B
- 9. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Near Point Average UL Throughput Sector B
- 10. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Far Point Average DL Throughput Sector B
- 11. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Far Point Average UL Throughput Sector B
- 12. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Near Point Average DL Throughput Sector C
- 13. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Near Point Average UL Throughput Sector C
- 14. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Far Point Average DL Throughput Sector C
- 15. Site Functionality Verification—Throughput Far Point Average UL Throughput Sector C
- 16. Site Functionality Verification—Latency Test Ping 32/128 Byte Sector A
- 17. Site Functionality Verification—Latency Test Ping 32/128 Byte Sector B
- 18. Site Functionality Verification—Latency Test Ping 32/128 Byte Sector C
- 19. DT Route Map
- 26. Serving PCI Plot
- 27. Average MAC DL Throughput Plot
- 28. Average MAC DL Throughput Histogram
- 29. Average MAC UL Throughput Plot
- 30. Average MAC UL Throughput Histogram
- 31. Serving Residual BLER Plot
- 32. Serving Residual BLER Histogram
- 33. Serving Rank Indicator Plot
- 34. Serving Rank Indicator Histogram
- 35. Serving CQI Plot
- 37. Serving Transmission Mode Plot
- 38. Serving Transmission Mode Histogram
- 49. SUMMARY • Maximum routes covered. • Azimuths are set to 30/160/260 to cover maximum area. • Site maximum throughput achieved. Null area .
- 50. COVERAGE AREA COVERED AREA: SECTOR A:450M SECTOR B:450M SECTOR C:600M
- 51. COVERAGE AREA
- 52. COVERAGE AREA
- 53. COVERAGE AREA