Dr. Rajib Bhattacharjee
MBBS, MD, DNBSS Trainee
Dept of Medical Oncology
Apollo Gleneagles Hospital
Patient Charecteristics
Overall Survival
Pem vs Extreme
CPS > 1
12.3 mo 10.3mo
HR – 0.78
(0.64-0.96)
P=0.0086
Pem vs Extreme
Total Population
11.6 mo 10.7 mo
HR 0.85
(0.71-1.03)
P=0.0456
Pem vs Extreme
Total Population- Final analysis
11.5 mo 10.7 mo
HR – 0.83
(0.7-0.99)
P=0.0199
Pem Chemo Vs Extreme
CPS>1
13.6 mo 10.4 mo
HR = 0.65
(0.53-0.80)
P<0.0001
Pem Chemo Vs Extreme
CPS>20
14.7 mo 11.0 mo
HR - 0.6
(0.45 – 0.82)
P = 0.0004
Pem Chemo Vs Extreme
Total population
13.0 mo 10.7 mo
HR – 0.77 P = 0.0033
PFS
Pem vs Extreme
CPS > 1
HR – 1.16 (0.96 – 1.39)
Pem vs Extreme
CPS > 20
HR = 0.99 (0.75-1.29) P=0.4565
Pem Vs Extreme
Total Population
HR =0.92
(0.77 -1.10)
P=0.1657
Pem Chemo Vs Extreme
CPS>1
HR = 0.82 (0.67 – 1.0)
Pem Chemo Vs Extreme
CPS>20
HR = 0.73
(0.55-0.93)
P=0.0162
Pem Chemo Vs Extreme
Total Population
HR = 1.34 (1.13 – 1.59)
Overall Response Rate
Pembro alone Pembro + chemo EXTREME
CPS > 20 26% 43% 36%
CPS > 1 19% 36% 35%
Total population 17% 36% 36%
Median Duration Of Response
Pembro alone Pembro + chemo EXTREME
CPS > 20 22.6 mo 7.1 mo 4.2 mo
CPS > 1 23.4 mo 6.7 mo 4.5 mo
Total population 22.6 mo 6.7 mo 4.5 mo
Conclusion of the Authors
Pembrolizumab combined with platinum and 5-
fluorouracil is an appropriate first-line
treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC
and pembrolizumab monotherapy is an
appropriate first line treatment for PD-L1-
positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.
THANK YOU

Keynote 48

  • 1.
    Dr. Rajib Bhattacharjee MBBS,MD, DNBSS Trainee Dept of Medical Oncology Apollo Gleneagles Hospital
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 15.
    Pem vs Extreme CPS> 1 12.3 mo 10.3mo HR – 0.78 (0.64-0.96) P=0.0086
  • 16.
    Pem vs Extreme TotalPopulation 11.6 mo 10.7 mo HR 0.85 (0.71-1.03) P=0.0456
  • 17.
    Pem vs Extreme TotalPopulation- Final analysis 11.5 mo 10.7 mo HR – 0.83 (0.7-0.99) P=0.0199
  • 18.
    Pem Chemo VsExtreme CPS>1 13.6 mo 10.4 mo HR = 0.65 (0.53-0.80) P<0.0001
  • 19.
    Pem Chemo VsExtreme CPS>20 14.7 mo 11.0 mo HR - 0.6 (0.45 – 0.82) P = 0.0004
  • 20.
    Pem Chemo VsExtreme Total population 13.0 mo 10.7 mo HR – 0.77 P = 0.0033
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Pem vs Extreme CPS> 1 HR – 1.16 (0.96 – 1.39)
  • 23.
    Pem vs Extreme CPS> 20 HR = 0.99 (0.75-1.29) P=0.4565
  • 24.
    Pem Vs Extreme TotalPopulation HR =0.92 (0.77 -1.10) P=0.1657
  • 25.
    Pem Chemo VsExtreme CPS>1 HR = 0.82 (0.67 – 1.0)
  • 26.
    Pem Chemo VsExtreme CPS>20 HR = 0.73 (0.55-0.93) P=0.0162
  • 27.
    Pem Chemo VsExtreme Total Population HR = 1.34 (1.13 – 1.59)
  • 29.
    Overall Response Rate Pembroalone Pembro + chemo EXTREME CPS > 20 26% 43% 36% CPS > 1 19% 36% 35% Total population 17% 36% 36% Median Duration Of Response Pembro alone Pembro + chemo EXTREME CPS > 20 22.6 mo 7.1 mo 4.2 mo CPS > 1 23.4 mo 6.7 mo 4.5 mo Total population 22.6 mo 6.7 mo 4.5 mo
  • 33.
    Conclusion of theAuthors Pembrolizumab combined with platinum and 5- fluorouracil is an appropriate first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and pembrolizumab monotherapy is an appropriate first line treatment for PD-L1- positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.
  • 34.