Kantz
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•1,277 views
The document discusses the challenges of applying psychological principles from research to real-world problems. It notes that few "double specialists" exist who are experts both in the scientific research and in the practical application area. Understanding how to apply complex psychological factors like early childhood experiences requires integrating many variables, and mastering these principles is a full-time job. Applying them in settings like daycare also requires full-time specialized knowledge, which some research psychologists may lack. The document argues that both real-world and research experts need better communication and more diverse experiences to successfully collaborate on solving practical problems.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Are you an Alice or a Shirley? ,[object Object]]()
Recommended
Kantz
The document discusses how students can use textual sources persuasively in their writing. It contrasts the approaches of two hypothetical students, Alice and Shirley, in analyzing sources. Alice sees research as a creative process to find answers and make original arguments, while Shirley views it as examining facts. The document also provides suggestions for teachers on how to guide students towards a more rhetorical analysis of sources and crafting of persuasive arguments.
Developmental reading Lesson 6 levels of comprehension
This document outlines 5 levels of reading comprehension:
1. Lexical comprehension involves understanding key vocabulary.
2. Literal comprehension focuses on answering basic questions like who, what, when, where.
3. Interpretive comprehension requires inferring details not explicitly stated.
4. Applied comprehension relates the text to one's own knowledge and opinions.
5. Affective comprehension examines the social and emotional aspects of a text.
Chapter 5 logical_fallacies_i
The document discusses logical fallacies, which are mistakes in reasoning that make an argument invalid. There are two major groups of logical fallacies: fallacies of relevance and fallacies of insufficient evidence. Fallacies of relevance occur when the premises of an argument are irrelevant to the conclusion. Some examples of fallacies of relevance include personal attacks, attacking an argument's motive rather than its merit, ignoring one's own failures, and distorting or ignoring parts of an opponent's argument.
LIB440 Week 1 Reasoning
This document provides an overview of deductive and inductive reasoning. It defines what an argument is and discusses the key elements of forming arguments, including making debatable statements, using logic, and constructing thesis statements. It also explains the basic forms of deductive and inductive arguments. For deductive arguments, it covers syllogisms and their components of major premise, minor premise, and conclusion. It provides examples of valid and invalid syllogisms and discusses inductive reasoning and how it differs from deductive reasoning.
Exercise answers chapter 1, 2 & 3
This document provides exercises and discussion questions from a critical thinking textbook. It includes sample answers to questions about moral relativism and inconsistencies that can arise from it. It also provides examples of statements and non-statements, and examines arguments with multiple premises and conclusions.
Research Proposal 3 - The Three-Part Thesis Statement
This document provides guidance on writing a strong 3-part thesis statement for an A-grade paper. It explains that a good thesis statement should:
1) Have a clear meaning that the reader can understand.
2) Present an idea that is tentatively either true or false, rather than clearly one or the other, so it can be discussed and proved or disproved.
3) Make it clear to the reader that there is a need to prove the thesis, and this need appears important.
The document then gives examples of strong and weak thesis statements and evaluates them based on these three criteria. It provides tips for writing tentative statements using modal verbs, indefinite subjects, and both together.
Critical thinking fall 2014 2015 (chapters 6,7,8,11 and 12 analyzing and eval...
Here are some potential fallacies you could commit in your sampling:
- Hasty generalization - Drawing a conclusion about a population based on a small, non-representative sample.
- Sampling bias - Only sampling data that agrees with your hypothesis and ignoring data that contradicts it.
- Leading/loaded question - Asking questions in a way that biases or leads respondents toward answering in a particular way.
- Confirmation bias - Seeking out or assigning more weight to information that confirms your preconceptions, and ignoring or undervaluing information that contradicts them.
- False dichotomy - Presenting sampling options as if they are mutually exclusive when there are actually other alternatives.
Being aware
Ch08 evaluating arguments
This document discusses evaluating arguments by determining whether an argument is "good" based on criteria such as the acceptability of its premises, logical validity, clarity, precision, relevance, consistency, completeness, and fairness. Premises should not conflict with personal experience or background beliefs unless sufficient evidence is provided. Arguments can be refuted by showing a critical premise is false or dubious, or that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Recommended
Kantz
The document discusses how students can use textual sources persuasively in their writing. It contrasts the approaches of two hypothetical students, Alice and Shirley, in analyzing sources. Alice sees research as a creative process to find answers and make original arguments, while Shirley views it as examining facts. The document also provides suggestions for teachers on how to guide students towards a more rhetorical analysis of sources and crafting of persuasive arguments.
Developmental reading Lesson 6 levels of comprehension
This document outlines 5 levels of reading comprehension:
1. Lexical comprehension involves understanding key vocabulary.
2. Literal comprehension focuses on answering basic questions like who, what, when, where.
3. Interpretive comprehension requires inferring details not explicitly stated.
4. Applied comprehension relates the text to one's own knowledge and opinions.
5. Affective comprehension examines the social and emotional aspects of a text.
Chapter 5 logical_fallacies_i
The document discusses logical fallacies, which are mistakes in reasoning that make an argument invalid. There are two major groups of logical fallacies: fallacies of relevance and fallacies of insufficient evidence. Fallacies of relevance occur when the premises of an argument are irrelevant to the conclusion. Some examples of fallacies of relevance include personal attacks, attacking an argument's motive rather than its merit, ignoring one's own failures, and distorting or ignoring parts of an opponent's argument.
LIB440 Week 1 Reasoning
This document provides an overview of deductive and inductive reasoning. It defines what an argument is and discusses the key elements of forming arguments, including making debatable statements, using logic, and constructing thesis statements. It also explains the basic forms of deductive and inductive arguments. For deductive arguments, it covers syllogisms and their components of major premise, minor premise, and conclusion. It provides examples of valid and invalid syllogisms and discusses inductive reasoning and how it differs from deductive reasoning.
Exercise answers chapter 1, 2 & 3
This document provides exercises and discussion questions from a critical thinking textbook. It includes sample answers to questions about moral relativism and inconsistencies that can arise from it. It also provides examples of statements and non-statements, and examines arguments with multiple premises and conclusions.
Research Proposal 3 - The Three-Part Thesis Statement
This document provides guidance on writing a strong 3-part thesis statement for an A-grade paper. It explains that a good thesis statement should:
1) Have a clear meaning that the reader can understand.
2) Present an idea that is tentatively either true or false, rather than clearly one or the other, so it can be discussed and proved or disproved.
3) Make it clear to the reader that there is a need to prove the thesis, and this need appears important.
The document then gives examples of strong and weak thesis statements and evaluates them based on these three criteria. It provides tips for writing tentative statements using modal verbs, indefinite subjects, and both together.
Critical thinking fall 2014 2015 (chapters 6,7,8,11 and 12 analyzing and eval...
Here are some potential fallacies you could commit in your sampling:
- Hasty generalization - Drawing a conclusion about a population based on a small, non-representative sample.
- Sampling bias - Only sampling data that agrees with your hypothesis and ignoring data that contradicts it.
- Leading/loaded question - Asking questions in a way that biases or leads respondents toward answering in a particular way.
- Confirmation bias - Seeking out or assigning more weight to information that confirms your preconceptions, and ignoring or undervaluing information that contradicts them.
- False dichotomy - Presenting sampling options as if they are mutually exclusive when there are actually other alternatives.
Being aware
Ch08 evaluating arguments
This document discusses evaluating arguments by determining whether an argument is "good" based on criteria such as the acceptability of its premises, logical validity, clarity, precision, relevance, consistency, completeness, and fairness. Premises should not conflict with personal experience or background beliefs unless sufficient evidence is provided. Arguments can be refuted by showing a critical premise is false or dubious, or that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Bassham3 powerpoint lecturenotes_ch06
The document discusses several logical fallacies of insufficient evidence including:
1) Inappropriate appeal to authority, which occurs when an unreliable authority is cited.
2) Appeal to ignorance, which claims something is true just because it hasn't been proven false.
3) False alternatives, which insists there are fewer options than actually exist.
4) Loaded questions, which contain hidden assumptions that make it difficult to answer without appearing to endorse those assumptions.
Week 1 LIB440 Rhetorical Appeals
This document discusses rhetorical appeals, including logos, ethos, and pathos. It defines each appeal and provides examples. Logos appeals to logic and reason through facts, statistics, and logical arguments. Ethos appeals to credibility and authority through the reputation and expertise of the source. Pathos appeals to emotion through stories, anecdotes, and the elicitation of feelings like love, pity, fear, and anger. The document suggests analyzing arguments to identify which appeals are used and how effectively, and provides exercises for students to practice using and identifying appeals.
Fallacies, Whats Up With Those Things
There are many types of logical fallacies that can undermine strong reasoning. The document categorizes common fallacies into five groups: feelings, distraction from the argument, misinformation, generalization, and irrelevant connections. Each category contains examples of specific fallacies such as appeals to emotion, ad hominem attacks, false causes, hasty generalizations, and slippery slopes. Studying fallacies helps people identify flawed logic and make stronger arguments.
Explicit and Implicit Claims, Critical Reading
This document discusses various reading comprehension skills and strategies, including:
- Interpreting text to find deeper meaning beyond literal words.
- Inferring ideas that are implicitly stated based on information given.
- Drawing conclusions by combining information and evidence from a full text.
- Analyzing separate parts of a text to understand the whole.
The Persuasive Essay Writing Process
The document discusses the key elements of a persuasive essay, including picking a position, analyzing the audience, using facts and evidence to support the position, refuting opposing views, and wrapping up with a concluding paragraph. It provides examples of topics that could be argued such as food choices in a campus union, and the debate between Conan O'Brien and Jay Leno over NBC's late night time slot. Tips are given on writing persuasively and practicing critical thinking skills.
The argument paper 2013
This document provides guidance on writing an effective argument paper. It explains that an argument paper must present a debatable topic or position. The paper should follow a classical structure, including an introductory paragraph with a clear thesis statement, background information, reasons and evidence to support the thesis, anticipated objections and rebuttals, and a concluding paragraph with a call to action. When developing the argument, writers should use logical reasoning supported by specific examples, consider opposing positions, and maintain a reasonable tone.
Understanding arguments
The slides aim to train members of Ateneo Debate Union to detect fallacies in argumentation. It is the hope that this would enhance their case construction skills. The principles used borrows heavily from logic.
Ewrt 2 class 11 machiavelli
This document discusses ambiguity in writing. It begins by defining ambiguity as occurring when a word, phrase, or sentence can have multiple possible interpretations, making the intended meaning unclear. While some writers intentionally use ambiguity, it generally just leads to confusion.
There are two main types of ambiguity discussed - ambiguity from words with multiple meanings, and structural or grammatical ambiguity. Words like "sharp" and "date" are given as examples of words with multiple meanings that can cause ambiguity. Structural ambiguity occurs when competing grammatical structures in a sentence make the intended meaning unclear. Examples of structurally ambiguous sentences are provided.
The document concludes by stating ambiguity should be resolved by clarifying the intended meaning of ambiguous words or reph
Ewrt 2 class 11 machiavelli
This document discusses ambiguity in writing. It defines ambiguity as occurring when a word, phrase, or sentence can have multiple possible interpretations, making the intended meaning unclear. Ambiguity is usually unintentional and leads to confusion, though some writers purposefully use ambiguity. Words with multiple meanings often cause ambiguity. Structural or grammatical ambiguity arises from competing grammatical structures within a sentence. To reduce ambiguity, writers should clarify intended meanings of ambiguous words and rephrase structurally ambiguous sentences.
Rhetoric powerpoint
The document defines and discusses various rhetorical techniques used in persuasive writing and speaking. It defines rhetoric as the art of persuasion according to philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. It then examines common rhetorical devices like similes, metaphors, hyperbole, euphemisms, loaded questions, and stereotypes. The purpose is to influence audiences without necessarily providing logical evidence or facts. These devices can enhance a writer's message if used effectively.
Week three tues thurs
The document outlines the assignments and topics for discussion in a Composition II class. Students are to submit Milestone 3 and write a 1-2 paragraph response about having read Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. The response should indicate they read and comprehended the material. The class will then discuss Wollstonecraft's central argument, who she was arguing against, the reasons she provides, and whether her argument is logically constructed or appeals more to emotion.
How Do I Identify Credible Sources?
The document provides guidance on how to identify credible sources of information. It discusses several questions to consider when evaluating sources:
1. Does the information seem too good to be true or unbelievable? Consider whether it conflicts with known facts or seems exaggerated.
2. Who wrote the information? Consider the author's credentials and expertise. Whether they can be identified and their affiliations evaluated.
3. When was the information written? Consider whether older information is still relevant or current links still work for websites.
4. Can the information be verified? Consider whether sources are cited and information can be corroborated elsewhere.
5. How is the information written? Consider whether there are errors, bias, manipulation
Chief Seattle Rhetorical Devices Prompt
Chief Seattle uses figurative language and rhetorical devices in his speech to Governor Stevens to accomplish several purposes. He aims to educate Stevens about Native American culture and beliefs, while also subtly mocking and warning the White man about arrogance through comparisons between the two groups. Seattle employs imagery, metaphors, sarcasm and contrasts between the peoples to persuade Stevens not to purchase more land or create more reservations, and to understand the Native American perspective.
Logical Fallacies
The document discusses logical fallacies and different types of faulty reasoning. It begins by explaining deductive and inductive reasoning, and how faulty syllogisms and incorrect premises or conclusions can lead to logical fallacies. It then defines a logical fallacy as an error in reasoning, and explains that fallacious arguments may sound convincing but are flawed. The document proceeds to discuss 9 common logical fallacies - red herring, post hoc, circular reasoning, hasty generalization, appeal to tradition, false dilemma, appeal to fear, false analogy, and non sequitur. It emphasizes the importance of being able to identify logical fallacies in one's own and other's writing.
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
This document provides an overview of argumentation and fallacies discussed across several chapters from the book "Thank You for Arguing" by Jay Heinrichs. It includes summaries of key concepts from chapters 1-3, 14-16 such as deductive vs inductive reasoning, common logical fallacies like straw man arguments, and the Toulmin model for constructing arguments. Example arguments and logical reasoning puzzles are also presented to demonstrate different logical structures. The document aims to teach objective analysis of arguments and identification of logical fallacies.
Less 15 Rdg Comp Pt2
This document provides guidance on how to critically read textbooks and other materials. It recommends evaluating the author's qualifications and potential biases, checking facts and differentiating facts from opinions. Readers should compare the content to their own knowledge and experiences, as well as biblical principles. When critiquing a text, readers should determine if it contains reasonable information, exaggerations, propaganda or biases. Facts should be distinguished from opinions.
PERSUASION PARAGRAPH
Group 7 presents a persuasive paragraph on the importance of laughter as medicine. The paragraph argues that laughter has powerful healing effects, from improving mood to aiding terminally ill patients. It cites evidence that laughter releases endorphins and can help more than medications in some cases. The conclusion is that laughter is a vital component of well-being and life satisfaction.
Teaching nonfiction
This document outlines a presentation on teaching nonfiction reading. It begins by defining goals such as exploring strategies for pairing nonfiction and fiction texts and brainstorming how to integrate nonfiction into existing fiction units. It then discusses defining nonfiction, reviewing Common Core standards, and the importance of teaching nonfiction to prepare students for college and careers. Various nonfiction text types and mediums are presented. Strategies like the before-during-after approach and pairing fiction with nonfiction texts on similar themes are explored as ways to teach nonfiction.
LIB440 Week 7.1
1. The document discusses logical fallacies and different types of relevance fallacies. It defines a fallacy as an error in reasoning and explains that relevance fallacies involve premises that are logically irrelevant to the conclusion.
2. The document outlines several types of relevance fallacies, including red herrings, false dilemmas, circular reasoning, appeals to emotion like fear and pity, irrelevant conclusions, wishful thinking, and denial.
3. Examples are provided for each type of fallacy to illustrate how the reasoning is flawed. Readers are encouraged to learn about logical fallacies to strengthen their own arguments and identify poor reasoning in the arguments of others.
Bassham3 powerpoint lecturenotes_ch08
The document discusses evaluating arguments by determining whether they are good arguments and whether their premises are acceptable. A good argument must be logically valid/cogent, clear, precise, have relevant premises, be consistent, complete, and fair. For premises to be acceptable, they should not conflict with experience or background beliefs and should come from a credible source. Arguments can be refuted by showing a critical premise is false/dubious or that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Kantz
The document discusses how students can use textual sources persuasively in their writing. It contrasts the approaches of two hypothetical students, Alice and Shirley, in researching and writing about the Battle of Agincourt. Alice sees research as an opportunity to make an original argument, while Shirley views it as a fact-finding task. The document suggests teaching students rhetorical reading and writing strategies to help them craft persuasive arguments using sources.
Fake news presentation engl 1301 koch fa
English Composition I Presentation on Fake News
I have collaborated for over a year with an English professor colleague on his composition classes which spend the whole semester researching and writing about fake news. This is the presentation that I used for their library instruction.
More Related Content
What's hot
Bassham3 powerpoint lecturenotes_ch06
The document discusses several logical fallacies of insufficient evidence including:
1) Inappropriate appeal to authority, which occurs when an unreliable authority is cited.
2) Appeal to ignorance, which claims something is true just because it hasn't been proven false.
3) False alternatives, which insists there are fewer options than actually exist.
4) Loaded questions, which contain hidden assumptions that make it difficult to answer without appearing to endorse those assumptions.
Week 1 LIB440 Rhetorical Appeals
This document discusses rhetorical appeals, including logos, ethos, and pathos. It defines each appeal and provides examples. Logos appeals to logic and reason through facts, statistics, and logical arguments. Ethos appeals to credibility and authority through the reputation and expertise of the source. Pathos appeals to emotion through stories, anecdotes, and the elicitation of feelings like love, pity, fear, and anger. The document suggests analyzing arguments to identify which appeals are used and how effectively, and provides exercises for students to practice using and identifying appeals.
Fallacies, Whats Up With Those Things
There are many types of logical fallacies that can undermine strong reasoning. The document categorizes common fallacies into five groups: feelings, distraction from the argument, misinformation, generalization, and irrelevant connections. Each category contains examples of specific fallacies such as appeals to emotion, ad hominem attacks, false causes, hasty generalizations, and slippery slopes. Studying fallacies helps people identify flawed logic and make stronger arguments.
Explicit and Implicit Claims, Critical Reading
This document discusses various reading comprehension skills and strategies, including:
- Interpreting text to find deeper meaning beyond literal words.
- Inferring ideas that are implicitly stated based on information given.
- Drawing conclusions by combining information and evidence from a full text.
- Analyzing separate parts of a text to understand the whole.
The Persuasive Essay Writing Process
The document discusses the key elements of a persuasive essay, including picking a position, analyzing the audience, using facts and evidence to support the position, refuting opposing views, and wrapping up with a concluding paragraph. It provides examples of topics that could be argued such as food choices in a campus union, and the debate between Conan O'Brien and Jay Leno over NBC's late night time slot. Tips are given on writing persuasively and practicing critical thinking skills.
The argument paper 2013
This document provides guidance on writing an effective argument paper. It explains that an argument paper must present a debatable topic or position. The paper should follow a classical structure, including an introductory paragraph with a clear thesis statement, background information, reasons and evidence to support the thesis, anticipated objections and rebuttals, and a concluding paragraph with a call to action. When developing the argument, writers should use logical reasoning supported by specific examples, consider opposing positions, and maintain a reasonable tone.
Understanding arguments
The slides aim to train members of Ateneo Debate Union to detect fallacies in argumentation. It is the hope that this would enhance their case construction skills. The principles used borrows heavily from logic.
Ewrt 2 class 11 machiavelli
This document discusses ambiguity in writing. It begins by defining ambiguity as occurring when a word, phrase, or sentence can have multiple possible interpretations, making the intended meaning unclear. While some writers intentionally use ambiguity, it generally just leads to confusion.
There are two main types of ambiguity discussed - ambiguity from words with multiple meanings, and structural or grammatical ambiguity. Words like "sharp" and "date" are given as examples of words with multiple meanings that can cause ambiguity. Structural ambiguity occurs when competing grammatical structures in a sentence make the intended meaning unclear. Examples of structurally ambiguous sentences are provided.
The document concludes by stating ambiguity should be resolved by clarifying the intended meaning of ambiguous words or reph
Ewrt 2 class 11 machiavelli
This document discusses ambiguity in writing. It defines ambiguity as occurring when a word, phrase, or sentence can have multiple possible interpretations, making the intended meaning unclear. Ambiguity is usually unintentional and leads to confusion, though some writers purposefully use ambiguity. Words with multiple meanings often cause ambiguity. Structural or grammatical ambiguity arises from competing grammatical structures within a sentence. To reduce ambiguity, writers should clarify intended meanings of ambiguous words and rephrase structurally ambiguous sentences.
Rhetoric powerpoint
The document defines and discusses various rhetorical techniques used in persuasive writing and speaking. It defines rhetoric as the art of persuasion according to philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. It then examines common rhetorical devices like similes, metaphors, hyperbole, euphemisms, loaded questions, and stereotypes. The purpose is to influence audiences without necessarily providing logical evidence or facts. These devices can enhance a writer's message if used effectively.
Week three tues thurs
The document outlines the assignments and topics for discussion in a Composition II class. Students are to submit Milestone 3 and write a 1-2 paragraph response about having read Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. The response should indicate they read and comprehended the material. The class will then discuss Wollstonecraft's central argument, who she was arguing against, the reasons she provides, and whether her argument is logically constructed or appeals more to emotion.
How Do I Identify Credible Sources?
The document provides guidance on how to identify credible sources of information. It discusses several questions to consider when evaluating sources:
1. Does the information seem too good to be true or unbelievable? Consider whether it conflicts with known facts or seems exaggerated.
2. Who wrote the information? Consider the author's credentials and expertise. Whether they can be identified and their affiliations evaluated.
3. When was the information written? Consider whether older information is still relevant or current links still work for websites.
4. Can the information be verified? Consider whether sources are cited and information can be corroborated elsewhere.
5. How is the information written? Consider whether there are errors, bias, manipulation
Chief Seattle Rhetorical Devices Prompt
Chief Seattle uses figurative language and rhetorical devices in his speech to Governor Stevens to accomplish several purposes. He aims to educate Stevens about Native American culture and beliefs, while also subtly mocking and warning the White man about arrogance through comparisons between the two groups. Seattle employs imagery, metaphors, sarcasm and contrasts between the peoples to persuade Stevens not to purchase more land or create more reservations, and to understand the Native American perspective.
Logical Fallacies
The document discusses logical fallacies and different types of faulty reasoning. It begins by explaining deductive and inductive reasoning, and how faulty syllogisms and incorrect premises or conclusions can lead to logical fallacies. It then defines a logical fallacy as an error in reasoning, and explains that fallacious arguments may sound convincing but are flawed. The document proceeds to discuss 9 common logical fallacies - red herring, post hoc, circular reasoning, hasty generalization, appeal to tradition, false dilemma, appeal to fear, false analogy, and non sequitur. It emphasizes the importance of being able to identify logical fallacies in one's own and other's writing.
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
This document provides an overview of argumentation and fallacies discussed across several chapters from the book "Thank You for Arguing" by Jay Heinrichs. It includes summaries of key concepts from chapters 1-3, 14-16 such as deductive vs inductive reasoning, common logical fallacies like straw man arguments, and the Toulmin model for constructing arguments. Example arguments and logical reasoning puzzles are also presented to demonstrate different logical structures. The document aims to teach objective analysis of arguments and identification of logical fallacies.
Less 15 Rdg Comp Pt2
This document provides guidance on how to critically read textbooks and other materials. It recommends evaluating the author's qualifications and potential biases, checking facts and differentiating facts from opinions. Readers should compare the content to their own knowledge and experiences, as well as biblical principles. When critiquing a text, readers should determine if it contains reasonable information, exaggerations, propaganda or biases. Facts should be distinguished from opinions.
PERSUASION PARAGRAPH
Group 7 presents a persuasive paragraph on the importance of laughter as medicine. The paragraph argues that laughter has powerful healing effects, from improving mood to aiding terminally ill patients. It cites evidence that laughter releases endorphins and can help more than medications in some cases. The conclusion is that laughter is a vital component of well-being and life satisfaction.
Teaching nonfiction
This document outlines a presentation on teaching nonfiction reading. It begins by defining goals such as exploring strategies for pairing nonfiction and fiction texts and brainstorming how to integrate nonfiction into existing fiction units. It then discusses defining nonfiction, reviewing Common Core standards, and the importance of teaching nonfiction to prepare students for college and careers. Various nonfiction text types and mediums are presented. Strategies like the before-during-after approach and pairing fiction with nonfiction texts on similar themes are explored as ways to teach nonfiction.
LIB440 Week 7.1
1. The document discusses logical fallacies and different types of relevance fallacies. It defines a fallacy as an error in reasoning and explains that relevance fallacies involve premises that are logically irrelevant to the conclusion.
2. The document outlines several types of relevance fallacies, including red herrings, false dilemmas, circular reasoning, appeals to emotion like fear and pity, irrelevant conclusions, wishful thinking, and denial.
3. Examples are provided for each type of fallacy to illustrate how the reasoning is flawed. Readers are encouraged to learn about logical fallacies to strengthen their own arguments and identify poor reasoning in the arguments of others.
Bassham3 powerpoint lecturenotes_ch08
The document discusses evaluating arguments by determining whether they are good arguments and whether their premises are acceptable. A good argument must be logically valid/cogent, clear, precise, have relevant premises, be consistent, complete, and fair. For premises to be acceptable, they should not conflict with experience or background beliefs and should come from a credible source. Arguments can be refuted by showing a critical premise is false/dubious or that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
What's hot (20)
Similar to Kantz
Kantz
The document discusses how students can use textual sources persuasively in their writing. It contrasts the approaches of two hypothetical students, Alice and Shirley, in researching and writing about the Battle of Agincourt. Alice sees research as an opportunity to make an original argument, while Shirley views it as a fact-finding task. The document suggests teaching students rhetorical reading and writing strategies to help them craft persuasive arguments using sources.
Fake news presentation engl 1301 koch fa
English Composition I Presentation on Fake News
I have collaborated for over a year with an English professor colleague on his composition classes which spend the whole semester researching and writing about fake news. This is the presentation that I used for their library instruction.
Lined Paper Printable Landscape - Printable Worl
1. The document provides instructions for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process for creating an account, submitting a request, reviewing bids from writers, authorizing payment, and requesting revisions if needed.
2. Users must first create an account with a password and email. They then complete a form with instructions, sources, and deadline to request a paper be written. Writers bid on the request and users choose a writer based on qualifications.
3. After receiving the paper, users can request revisions if needed. HelpWriting.net promises original, high-quality content and refunds for plagiarized work. The process aims to fully meet users' writing assistance needs.
Persuasion 000
This document provides information about persuasion and the techniques used for effective persuasion. It defines persuasion as bringing an audience to believe a certain viewpoint or influence them to take action. It discusses Aristotle's three appeals of logos, ethos, and pathos that should be used to persuade an audience. Logos involves the use of logic, facts, examples, and addressing opposition. Ethos relates to establishing credibility through competence, honesty, and energy. Pathos involves appealing to an audience's emotions. The document also discusses analyzing the audience, providing motivation, and using Maslow's hierarchy of needs to understand what motivates people.
Academic Essay Samples.pdf
Academic Essay Examples - 15+ in PDF | Examples. Academic Essay Examples - 18+ in PDF | Examples. FREE 7+ Academic Essay Samples in MS Word | PDF. Academic Essay - 20+ Examples, Format, Pdf | Examples. Academic Essay Structure Tips [Writing Guide] | Pro Essay Help. 19+ Essay Templates in PDF. Impressive Academic Essay Format ~ Thatsnotus. College Essay Examples - 9+ in PDF | Examples. College Essay Examples - 13+ in PDF | Examples. FREE 22+ Sample Essay Templates in MS Word | Google Docs | Pages | PDF. College Admissions Essay Workshop - 9 Types of Supplemental Essays .... 004 Essay Example Write An Academic ~ Thatsnotus. Student Essay - 9+ Examples, Format, Pdf | Examples. College Essay Format: Simple Steps to Be Followed. 001 Essay Example What Is Good Academic To Write About ~ Thatsnotus. 24 Greatest College Essay Examples – RedlineSP. Academic Writing Sample Essay Fresh English Academic Editing Fast and .... college essay examples pdf. Example of academic essay writing Boone | ThesisEssay76 - (2021) Academic Essay Samples
First Impressions Essay
First Impression Essay | The Complete Guide to First Impressions Essay .... Free First Impressions Essay Examples and Topic Ideas | Studymoose.com. First Impression is the best impression.Essay writing in English. - YouTube. Awesome First Impression Essay ~ Thatsnotus. First impression lasts essay. ⇉First Impressions May Be Deceiving Essay Example | GraduateWay. My first impression (300 Words) - PHDessay.com. Importance Of First Impressions - astonishingceiyrs. Essay on the first impression is the last impression || write an essay .... First impressions essay - gcisdk12.web.fc2.com. ⭐ First essay. First Impressions Essay. 2022-10-19. First impression is Last impression paragraph || #essay - YouTube. first impressions essay the five paragraph essay example essay on .... First Impressions: First Impressions Essay. 002 Essay Example Descring First Impression On College My Of ~ Thatsnotus.
Academic Writing
This document discusses academic writing and provides guidance on how to write effectively for university. It defines academic writing as a formal style that presents a focused argument supported by evidence from credible sources. While it has certain conventions, academic writing is not "better" but is what is required in university. The document outlines five components of good academic writing: having a clear argument or approach, structure, evidence, coherence in telling a logical story, and clarity of expression. It emphasizes developing a thesis, signposting your argument, using research to support claims, engaging respectfully with sources, and structuring writing in a coherent way through paragraphs and linking ideas.
Essay On Rasta Suraksha. Online assignment writing service.
This document outlines the steps to request an assignment writing service from HelpWriting.net:
1. Create an account with a password and email.
2. Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, deadline, and attaching a sample work.
3. Choose a writer based on their bid, qualifications, history, and feedback, then make a deposit to start the assignment.
4. Review the completed paper and authorize final payment if satisfied, or request free revisions.
Remembrance Day Essay.pdf
Remembrance day essay introduction. Remembrance day essay topics. Literacy Shed Plus - Remembrance Day. Essay for remembrance day crafts. Remembrance day. Remembrance Day - Australian History Years 5, 6, 7 | Aussie Star .... Remembrance Day Essay - Detailed Outline - http/www.cbc.ca/news/canada ....
Mba top schools in india
The document discusses addressing audiences effectively when presenting information. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the audience's backgrounds, views, and experiences. Knowing the audience helps determine the appropriate language, writing style, evidence used, and how to best make your case. The document provides tips for tailoring a presentation based on whether the audience is neutral or unfriendly toward the issue. It also discusses word choice, figures of speech, definitions, and tone.
写科研论文的高级方法学
This document provides tips for improving scientific writing skills. It recommends analyzing papers from the reader's perspective to understand why the research is important and how it benefits other work. It also suggests reviewing one's own writing as a reviewer would to identify weaknesses and make revisions. Considering the needs of the target journal and audience is important to produce high quality papers that will be accepted for publication.
Making an argument presentation by duke university writing center
Orwell argues that modern English, especially in writing, contains bad linguistic habits that impair clear thought. He claims these habits have spread through imitation and can be avoided through conscious effort. Orwell reasons that removing these habits allows one to think more clearly, and clear thought is necessary for political progress. He uses examples from his own writing and the works of others to support this claim and acknowledge potential counterarguments.
How to write a thesis statment
The document provides guidance on writing an effective thesis statement. It defines a thesis statement as declaring an author's argument or belief that they intend to prove. A good thesis statement makes the paper about more than just summarizing facts. It should be specific, present an arguable point, and guide the reader through the paper. The document provides examples of strong thesis statements and tests to determine if a thesis statement is focused and thought-provoking.
English 111, October 2nd, 2012 Late classes
This document provides instructions and prompts for students to help them choose a topic for an upcoming research and argument project related to the current US presidential election. It guides students through a free writing exercise to generate lists of important issues and values, things they would be willing to die for, topics mentioned by presidential candidates, and a combined list. Students are asked to consider which topics they would be most interested in researching for a month. The document instructs students that the project will involve a neutral, fact-based research memo and an argumentative piece staking out their own position on the chosen topic. It provides due dates and grading criteria for the project.
Rhetorical Essay Topics
Rhetorical Analysis Reflection
Key Elements Of Rhetorical Analysis
Rhetorical Analysis Of Ethos
Write A Rhetorical Analysis Essay About Writing
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Arsenal Of Democracy
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Gender Equality Essay
Reflections On Rhetorical Appeals
Outliers Rhetorical Analysis
Rhetorical Analysis Reflection
Rhetorical Speech Examples
Rhetoric and Argument Essays
Rhetoric In Student Essay
Rhetorical Essay About Bullying
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Two TED Talks
Rhetoric In English 101
Rocky Balboa Speech Analysis
Rhetorical Analysis On Ted Talk
Reflective Essay On Rhetoric
My Rhetorical Summary Essay
Rhetorical Analysis Response
Topics For A Problem Solution Essay
How to Write a Problem Solution Essay - Comprehensive Guide. Problem Solution Essay Topics Total Assignment Help. 001 Problem Solution Essay Thatsnotus. Topics For Propose A Solution Essay. How To Write A Problem And Solution Essay IELTS ACHIEVE. Problem and solution essays topics - Top 5 Problem and Solution Essay .... Problem solution essay sample. 101 Problem Solution Essay Topics, For .... 200 Most Commonly Accepted Problem And Solution Topics. How to Write a Problem-Solution Essay in 16 Easy Steps. 30 Problem Solution Essay Topics College The Latest - scholarship. Problem solution essay example college. Problem Solution Essay .... Critical essay: Problem solution essay example college. IELTS Problem Solution Essays Topics for Students in 2022. 005 Essay Example Scan3 Problem Solution Sample Thatsnotus. Imposing Problem Solving Essay Examples Pdf Thatsnotus. How to Write a Problem Solution Essay: Guide with Examples. 008 Essay Example Writing Problem Solution Transition To Academic .... Problem solving topics. 100 Problem Solution Essay Topics to Spark .... 10 Beautiful Ideas For Problem Solution Essay 2024. 10 Beautiful Ideas For Problem Solution Essay 2023. PROBLEM-SOLUTION ESSAY EXPLANATION ACTIVITIES AND ANSWERS by Carmen .... Problem and Solution Essay. Problem-solution essays. 100 Problem Solution Essay Topics with Sample Essays. PPT - PROBLEM-SOLUTION ESSAY PowerPoint Presentation, free download .... School paper: Problem solution essay examples. Problem and solution Worksheet Inspirational Problem solution Essay .... What is an academic problem-solution essay? Academic Marker. Pin by lirik_pas on your essay Problem solution essay, Essay examples .... IELTS Problem Solution Essays Step-by-Step Guide IELTS Jacky Topics For A Problem Solution Essay Topics For A Problem Solution Essay
Argument Essay Sample Papers.pdf
FREE 15+ Argumentative Essay Samples in PDF | MS Word. FREE 9+ Argumentative Essay Samples in PDF. FREE 16+ Argumentative Writing Samples & Templates in PDF | MS Word. Argumentative essay example short Truth or Consequences .... 005 Sample Essay Argument Example ~ Thatsnotus. 50 Compelling Argumentative Essay Topics. 018 Classical Argument Unit Assignment Page 1 Essay Example Examples Of .... Sample Argumentative Essay. Business Paper: Sample argument essay. Argumentative Writing - 6+ Examples, Format, Pdf | Examples. How to Write an Argumentative Essay – Samples and Topics. Sample Research Argumentative Essay - How to create a Research .... 004 Essay Example Ideas For Argumentative ~ Thatsnotus. 015 Argumentation Essay Example Student Refutation Writing Samples .... How to Write an Argumentative Essay Step By Step - Gudwriter. What Is an Argumentative Essay? Simple Examples To Guide You .... Argumentative Essay Topics for College Assignments - Blog BuyEssayClub.com. Check my Essay: Argumentative essay writing examples. Argumentative Essay Examples For Middle School – Telegraph. Word Essay – How to Write Manual with Examples | EssayRuler - Easy .... 009 How To Write Claim For An Argumentative Essay Example Good .... Sample Argumentative Essay.doc. Argumentative Essay Examples, Structure & Topics | Pro Essay Help. Argumentative Essay.docx | Higher Education | Government | Free 30-day .... Good argumentative essay introduction examples – UNI Radio. 005 Examples Of Argumentative Essays Essay Example Research Paper Free .... Expository essay: Argumentative essay practice. Argumentative Writing Essay | Templates at allbusinesstemplates.com. 005 Argumentative Essay Sample Research Paper ~ Museumlegs.
Similar to Kantz (17)
Essay On Rasta Suraksha. Online assignment writing service.
Essay On Rasta Suraksha. Online assignment writing service.
Making an argument presentation by duke university writing center
Making an argument presentation by duke university writing center
More from Heather Wayne
Englwrit112: Strategies for revising Unit 2
College Writing lesson plan with strategies for revising Unit 2: Responding to a Text. Includes activities for rethinking organization, developing critical analysis of quotes, and revising introductions.
Englwrit112: Writing Contexts
The document provides guidance for an assignment to write an essay exploring contexts that have shaped the writer. It instructs students to complete a series of generative writing exercises to identify contexts, writing experiences, places of writing, and audiences. This includes free writing about a chosen item from their lists. Students will then use this generative writing to draft an essay exploring how their writing has been influenced by specific contexts. They are to discuss strategies for completing the assignment in small groups.
Eng131: The Artist of Disappearance Lesson Plan
This document discusses Anita Desai's short story "The Artist of Disappearance". It provides context about the story structure and foreshadowing. It also compares the main character Ravi's artwork of sculpting landscapes out of natural materials to the earthworks of artists like Robert Smithson and Andy Goldsworthy. The document analyzes themes in Desai's story about nature, environmentalism, and the relationship between art and commercialization. It explores the character of Harish and his obsession with surfaces as possibly representing spiritual enlightenment, mental illness, or a rejection of society. Overall, the document provides literary analysis and visual examples to illuminate themes and interpretation of Desai's short story.
Eng755 Frank Norris presentation
The document discusses Frank Norris's novel The Pit and how it depicts the formation of American taste and commodification of art in the late 19th century. It analyzes Norris's descriptions of paintings owned by the wealthy Jadwin family, including works by Bouguereau, Détaille, and Hudson River School artists. The paintings reflect the Jadwins' acquisition of European art as a symbol of their newfound wealth and status.
Enc1101 drafting unit 3
The document provides guidance on drafting a discourse community ethnography. It discusses including a methodology section describing observations, interviews, and text collection. It suggests structuring the ethnography around concepts like identity, authority, and learning. The document also provides examples of structures used in student papers and recommends outlining the paper including an introduction, methodology, results/discussion sections. It offers tips for drafting sections, including relevant evidence, and connecting ideas to the overall argument.
Enc1101 drafting unit 3
This document provides guidance on drafting a discourse community ethnography. It discusses including observations, interviews, and collecting texts in the methodology section. It also discusses structuring the ethnography, including using an introduction, methodology, results/discussion sections. Sample structures from other papers are shown. The document advises starting to draft the methodology section and outlines what it should include. It also provides tips for organizing data into an outline, clarifying main ideas, and starting to draft sections with evidence. Finally, it reviews Swales' CARS model and guides establishing a territory, niche, and occupying the niche in an introduction.
Enc1101 unit3 data analysis
The document discusses organizing and analyzing data from a discourse community ethnography. It prompts the reader to color code which characteristics scholars have focused on in their research, including genres, expertise, lexis, intercommunication, and participation. The reader is then asked to discuss with a partner which characteristics are most interesting in their data and share tentative thesis statements with the class.
Wardle
The article discusses how genres shape identity and authority. It focuses on a case study of Alan, an IT employee in a university's humanities department. Alan struggled to adopt the expected identity and gain authority within the discourse community. The faculty saw Alan as a "tool" to manage computers rather than a full member, which limited his ability to enculturate and align within the community. Authority is socially constructed based on factors like language use, participation in genres, and perceptions of one's role.
Enc1101 collecting data unit3
The document provides guidance for conducting an ethnographic study of a discourse community. It instructs students to:
1) Observe the community in action for 30 minutes to 1 hour, taking notes on behaviors, language practices, and evidence of authority.
2) Collect texts used by the community such as emails, newsletters, and social media posts.
3) Interview community members, preparing questions about goals, expertise/participation, communication/genres used, and specialized terminology or "lexis".
4) Practice interviewing in groups and share sample interview questions.
Mirabelli
Tony Mirabelli argues that food service jobs require complex language and literacy skills that are often overlooked. He notes that waiters and waitresses must understand genres like menus and be able to "read" customers in order to meet their needs. Mirabelli also discusses how meaning is socially embedded in restaurant interactions based on power dynamics between customers and staff. He aims to bring awareness to the unrecognized literacies of food service work.
Swales discourse communities
The document discusses discourse communities and their key characteristics including goals, intercommunication, participation, genres, specialized lexis or vocabulary, and requisite expertise. It then prompts the reader to analyze whether various groups like a soccer team, sorority, university, or class constitute discourse communities based on exhibiting these traits. The document also explores participating in a discourse community without being fully assimilated into it and how understanding discourse communities can help one navigate writing and various communities.
Enc1101 drafting unit2
The document provides guidance on drafting an autoethnography paper. It outlines the typical sections of an autoethnography - Introduction, Methodology, Results, and Discussion. For each section, it offers examples of what to include and how to structure the content. The Methodology section example describes conducting a study analyzing one's writing process for two different types of papers. The Results section example compares time spent on planning, writing, editing, and distractions. The Discussion section example analyzes how audience impacted the composition process.
Coding together
The speaker is working on summarizing other scholars' reactions to Laura Mulvey's thesis on gender and spectatorship in film. They recognize they need to organize the scholars they have discussed by category and identify a problem with Mulvey's thesis to transition into discussing how other scholars have also complicated her thesis. The speaker struggles to articulate their thoughts out loud and maintain their train of thought.
Berkenkotter Murray
This document discusses several research articles and reflections: Carol Berkenkotter's research on a writer's drafting and revision process, Donald Murray's reflection on trying to explain death to children for a magazine, Berkenkotter's additions to scholarly conversations, what surprised Berkenkotter and Murray in their research processes, Murray's thoughts on sharing writing processes with students, the evolution of one writer's paper title, how familiarity with genres impacts the writing process, and what students can learn from Murray's reflection.
Perl
Sondra Perl studied the writing processes of five unskilled college writers. She had them think aloud as they composed essays, which she video recorded and coded. Perl found that unskilled writers engaged in little planning before writing, focused on low-level concerns like spelling during writing, and did minimal revision. Their composing behaviors highlighted inadequate writing strategies and rules compared to skilled writers.
Enc1101 Drafting Unit 1
This document provides guidance for students on drafting the first part of a rhetorical analysis paper. It discusses key rhetorical concepts like audience, purpose and genre. It also summarizes key points from course readings on using evidence persuasively, structuring arguments, and making rhetorical choices regarding tone, evidence and language. Students are prompted to apply these concepts to their own draft and given guidance on effective introductions, body paragraphs and conclusions.
Haas and Flower
The document discusses a study by Christina Haas and Linda Flower on the reading strategies used by experienced and inexperienced readers. The researchers found that experienced readers used rhetorical strategies 20% of the time when reading, compared to only 1% for inexperienced readers. Inexperienced readers relied more on content and feature strategies. The study suggests teaching students rhetorical reading strategies to help them better comprehend difficult texts.
Grant-Davie
1) Grant-Davie defines rhetorical situation as comprising four key constituents: rhetor(s), audience(s), constraints, and exigence(s).
2) Exigence refers to what the discourse is about, including topics and values at stake, why it is needed now, and what it aims to accomplish.
3) The constituents can be plural, such as having multiple rhetors, audiences, or exigences. Constraints are factors that influence the audience and rhetor.
Enc1101 Drafting Unit 4 Part 2
This document outlines an assignment to draft part of a portfolio reflecting on writing skills developed over the semester. It includes an introduction stating the topic, context about learning to develop original arguments, an example of struggling to write a thesis statement and finding focusing sources to support an argument rather than constructing the argument from sources, and an analysis connecting the experience to course concepts. It concludes by requesting an A grade based on effort, performance, and demonstrated learning.
Enc1101 unit3 data analysis
The document discusses characteristics that scholars have focused on in discourse community ethnography research, including expertise, lexis, genre, and participation. It prompts the reader to choose which characteristics they will focus on for their own research. It also summarizes the arguments of different scholars, and asks the reader to look for aspects of their partner's data that could form the basis of an argument. Finally, it provides guidance on drafting the methodology section of a paper, including what methods need to be described.
More from Heather Wayne (20)
Recently uploaded
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about machines behaving intelligently during May 2024
Artificial Intelligence for XMLDevelopment
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
Consult the full report at https://www.oecd.org/digital/oecd-artificial-intelligence-review-of-germany-609808d6-en.htm
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
Ocean lotus Threat actors project by John Sitima 2024 (1).pptx
Ocean Lotus cyber threat actors represent a sophisticated, persistent, and politically motivated group that poses a significant risk to organizations and individuals in the Southeast Asian region. Their continuous evolution and adaptability underscore the need for robust cybersecurity measures and international cooperation to identify and mitigate the threats posed by such advanced persistent threat groups.
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
ABSTRACT: A prima vista, un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ potrebbero avere in comune il fatto di essere entrambi blocchi di costruzione, o dipendenze di progetti creativi e software. La realtà è che un mattoncino Lego e il caso della backdoor XZ hanno molto di più di tutto ciò in comune.
Partecipate alla presentazione per immergervi in una storia di interoperabilità, standard e formati aperti, per poi discutere del ruolo importante che i contributori hanno in una comunità open source sostenibile.
BIO: Sostenitrice del software libero e dei formati standard e aperti. È stata un membro attivo dei progetti Fedora e openSUSE e ha co-fondato l'Associazione LibreItalia dove è stata coinvolta in diversi eventi, migrazioni e formazione relativi a LibreOffice. In precedenza ha lavorato a migrazioni e corsi di formazione su LibreOffice per diverse amministrazioni pubbliche e privati. Da gennaio 2020 lavora in SUSE come Software Release Engineer per Uyuni e SUSE Manager e quando non segue la sua passione per i computer e per Geeko coltiva la sua curiosità per l'astronomia (da cui deriva il suo nickname deneb_alpha).
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about the irresponsible use of machine intelligence in May 2024
Choosing The Best AWS Service For Your Website + API.pptx
Have you ever been confused by the myriad of choices offered by AWS for hosting a website or an API?
Lambda, Elastic Beanstalk, Lightsail, Amplify, S3 (and more!) can each host websites + APIs. But which one should we choose?
Which one is cheapest? Which one is fastest? Which one will scale to meet our needs?
Join me in this session as we dive into each AWS hosting service to determine which one is best for your scenario and explain why!
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about the Elixir programming ecosystem in May 2024
Fueling AI with Great Data with Airbyte Webinar
This talk will focus on how to collect data from a variety of sources, leveraging this data for RAG and other GenAI use cases, and finally charting your course to productionalization.
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
AI-Powered Food Delivery Transforming App Development in Saudi Arabia.pdf
In this blog post, we'll delve into the intersection of AI and app development in Saudi Arabia, focusing on the food delivery sector. We'll explore how AI is revolutionizing the way Saudi consumers order food, how restaurants manage their operations, and how delivery partners navigate the bustling streets of cities like Riyadh, Jeddah, and Dammam. Through real-world case studies, we'll showcase how leading Saudi food delivery apps are leveraging AI to redefine convenience, personalization, and efficiency.
Infrastructure Challenges in Scaling RAG with Custom AI models
Building Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems with open-source and custom AI models is a complex task. This talk explores the challenges in productionizing RAG systems, including retrieval performance, response synthesis, and evaluation. We’ll discuss how to leverage open-source models like text embeddings, language models, and custom fine-tuned models to enhance RAG performance. Additionally, we’ll cover how BentoML can help orchestrate and scale these AI components efficiently, ensuring seamless deployment and management of RAG systems in the cloud.
Recently uploaded (20)
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Ocean lotus Threat actors project by John Sitima 2024 (1).pptx
Ocean lotus Threat actors project by John Sitima 2024 (1).pptx
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
Choosing The Best AWS Service For Your Website + API.pptx
Choosing The Best AWS Service For Your Website + API.pptx
AI-Powered Food Delivery Transforming App Development in Saudi Arabia.pdf
AI-Powered Food Delivery Transforming App Development in Saudi Arabia.pdf
Infrastructure Challenges in Scaling RAG with Custom AI models
Infrastructure Challenges in Scaling RAG with Custom AI models
Kantz
- 1. “ Helping Students Use Textual Sources Persuasively” Margaret Kantz