Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Patel TM 201110
1. Transradial Approach: Just Do It !
TEJAS M. PATEL, MD, DM, FACC, FESC, FSCAI
PROFESSOR & HEAD
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences,
Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College,
Sheth K.M. School of PG Studies & Research,
Sheth V. S. Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
DIRECTOR
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences,
TCVS (Total Cardiovascular Solutions) Pvt. Ltd.
Ahmedabad, India.
9. TRI TFI
Major Vascular Complications (n=1604) (n=5211)
Kiemeneij F et al. 1996 J Am Coll Cardiol 0 2%
Ziakas A et al. Am J Cardiol 1999 0 1.5%
Tift Mann et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 0 4%
Choussat R et al. Eur Heart J 2000 0 4.5%
Hildic S et al. 2000 0 6%
Louvard Y et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 0 1.3%
Saito S et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 0 3%
Valsecchi O et al. Ital Heart J 2003 0 1.2%
Lefevre T (TCT 2003) 0 2.3%
Pooled data 0.0% 3.8%
10. SUCCESS
Transradial PCI In Setting Of AMI 96.6%
Tift Mann et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 (n=68) 96%
Delarche N et al. Am J Geritar Cardiol 1999 (n=46) 100%
Kim MH et al. J Invasive Cardiol 2000 (n=30) 90%
Mathias et al. J Invasive Cardiol 2000 (n=14) 100%
Mulkutla SR et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 (n=41) 100%
Hamon M et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 (n=119) 100%
Louvard Y et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 (n=267) 98%
Ziakas A et al. Am J Cardiol 1999 (n=100) 90%
Saito S et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 (n=77) 96%
Valsecchi O et al. Ital Heart J 2003 (n=163) 97%
11. TRI TFI
Procedural Success Final TIMI 3 Flow
(n=665) (n=1726)
Tift Mann et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 96 % 96 %
Ziakas A et al. Am J Cardiol 1999 99% 97%
Louvard Y et al. Catheter Cardiovasc interv 2002 98% 97%
Saito S et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 96 % 97 %
Valsecchi O et al. Ital Heart J 2003 97% 96%
Pooled data 97% 97%
p= ns in all studies
12. TRI TFI
Major Vascular Complications (n=945) (n=2802)
Tift Mann et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 0 4%
Ziakas A et al. Am J Cardiol 1999 0 1.5%
Louvard Y et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 0 1.3%
Saito S et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 0 3%
Valsecchi O et. al Ital Heart J 2003 0 1.2%
Lefevre T (TCT 2003) 0 2.3%
Pooled data 0 1.8%
13. TRI: Impact of Gp IIb / IIIa Blockers
Absence of Major Vascular Complications
TRI TFI
Major vascular complications
(n=244) (n=1953)
Choussat R et al. Eur Heart J 2000 0 4.5%
ESPRIT trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 0.7% 6.6%
Pooled data 0.4% 6.5%
14. TRI In AMI: No Delay In Reperfusion
TRI TFI
PROCEDURAL TIME (minutes)
(n=945) (n=2802)
Ziakas A et al. Am J Cardiol 1999 43 19 50 28
Louvard Y et al. (Centre A) Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 45 42 43 32
Louvard Y et al. (Centre B) Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 67 25 68 21
Saito S et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 44 18 51 21
Valsecchi O et al. Ital Heart J 2003 62 23 61 22
Lefevre T (TCT 2003) 45 50 48 55
P=ns
15. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44 (2): 349-56
Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous
coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures;
Systematic overview and meta-analysis of
randomized trials
Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML et al.
CONCLUSION:
The radial approach for coronary procedures appears as a
safe alternative to femoral access. Moreover, radial access
virtually eliminates local vascular complications
16. Am Heart J. 2009; 157(1):132-40
Radial versus femoral access for coronary
angiography or intervention and the impact on major
bleeding and ischemic events:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M et al.
CONCLUSION:
Radial access reduced major bleeding and
there was a corresponding trend for reduction
in ischemic events compared to femoral access
17. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;74: 408-415
Effectiveness of the transradial approach to reduce bleedings
in patients undergoing urgent coronary angioplasty with
GPIIb / IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes
Marco De Carlo, Gabriele Borelli, Roberto Gistri et al.
CONCLUSION:
The transradial approach dramatically reduces access site
bleedings, including TIMI major and minor bleedings, and
transfusion rate, while preserving procedural success and
clinical outcome. The transradial approach is an attractive
solution to reduce bleeding complications in patients
treated with GPIs
18. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75 (5): 695-9
Arterial access and door-to-balloon times for
primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients
presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Weaver AN, Henderson RA, Gilchrist IC et al.
CONCLUSION:
Patients presenting with STEMI can undergo
successful PCI via radial artery approach without
compromise in D2B times as compared to femoral artery
approach
19. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75(7):991-5
Comparison of door-to-balloon times for primary PCI
using transradial versus transfemoral approach
Pancholy S, Patel T, Sanghvi K et al.
CONCLUSION:
Transradial approach to primary PCI provides similar
door-to-balloon times to transfemoral approach, and
significantly lowers access site related complications,
in patients presenting with STEMI
21. Heart 2008;94:1530-1532
EDITORIAL
Should radial artery access be the "gold standard" for PCI?
Martial Hamon1, James Nolan2
1 University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
2 University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
22. Heart 2008;94:1019-1025
Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with
transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study
(Mortality benefit of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg)
A J Chase, E B Fretz, W P Warburton et al.
Design, setting and patients:
By data linkage of three prospectively collated provincial registries, 38 872
procedures in 32 822 patients in British Columbia were analysed
The association between access site, transfusion & outcomes was assessed
Main outcome measures: 30-Day and 1-year mortality
23. CONCLUSION:
• The MORTAL study ,which looked at a registry
of 33,000 Canadian patients, showed 50% less
blood transfusions and accompanying
reductions in mortality for patient done radially
• By probit regression the absolute increase in risk
of death at 1 year associated with receiving a
transfusion was 6.78%
27. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2008; 1:379-386
Trends in the Prevalence and Outcomes of Radial and
Femoral Approaches to Percutaneous Coronary
Intervention
A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry
Sunil V. Rao, Fang-Shu Ou, Tracy Y et al.
CONCLUSION:
Study looked at 593,094 U.S. patients
and found that radial patients experienced
58% less bleeding complications
28. RIVAL Study – ACC 2011
Lancet 2011;377:1409–20
Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and
intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL):
a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial
Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J et al.
CONCLUSION:
Radial access was associated with a
reduction in access-related complications
There was a trend towards survival benefit
in patients with STEMI
29. Ostensible Reasons
Blah…Blah…Blah
• Small artery
• RA spasm
• Difficult to use bulky devices
• Inadequate guide catheter backup
• Not so good for difficult coronary
anatomy
• Not safe for complex anatomy
• RA occlusion
• Radiation exposure
30. Experience
• From Jan - 1992 to Nov - 2001
• 25,450 Transfemoral procedures
• 6,360 coronary interventions through TFA
• From Dec - 2001 to June - 2011
• 35,202 Transradial procedures
• 9,152 coronary interventions through TRA
• 291 Peripheral intervention through TRA
• 98% procedures through TRA
110. Our experience
Through TRA
Renal 107
Iliac 36
SFA 11
SMA 02
Subclavian 28
Vertebral & Basilar 66
ICA 41
Total 291
111. Published data by our group
Patel T, Kuladhipati I, Shah S. et al.
Successful percutaneous endovascular management of acute post
traumatic superior mesenteric artery dissection using transradial
approach. J. Invasc. Cardiol. 2010; 22: 4: 61-64
Patel T, Shah S, Pancholy S, Coppola J. et al.
Contralateral transradial approach for carotid artery stenting:
A feasibility study. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 2: 268-275
Patel T, Shah S, Radadia R. et al.
Transradial approach for stenting of vertebro-basilar stenosis:
A feasibility study. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 74: 925-931