Call Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
PCI & AimRadial 2018 | Radial vs Femoral: Review of the Evidence in 2018 - Ian C Gilchrist
1. Radial vs Femoral: Review of the
Evidence in 2018
Ian C Gilchrist, MD, FACC, FSCAI
Professor of Medicine
Penn State’s Hershey Medical Center
Heart & Vascular Institute
Hershey, PA
USA
2. icg2018
Class IA Recommendation
Class I:
Conditions for which there is evidence, general
agreement, or both that a given procedure or
treatment is useful & effective
Level of Evidence A:
Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials
4. icg2018
Vascular Complications TRA over TFA
Key
No complication
Vascular complication
Avoided avoided a complication
by using radial instead of
femoral access
NNT = 21 (95% CI 18-27)
Slide adapted from John A. Bittl, MD, AHA 2018 presentation
5. icg2018
Major Bleeding–TRA in ACS
Key
No bleeding
Major bleeding
Avoided bleeding with TRA
NNT = 47 (95% CI 35-79)
Slide adapted from John A. Bittl, MD, AHA 2018 presentation
6. icg2018
Mortality Reduction–TRA in ACS
Key
Alive
Dead
Avoided dying by using radial
instead of femoral access
NNT = 100 (95% CI 67-235)
Slide adapted from John A. Bittl, MD, AHA 2018 presentation
8. icg2018
Guideline Changes
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e000035.
Summary of Recommendations
• A radial-first approach is strongly recommended in
all patients, but a graduated level of center and
operator experience is recommended before TRA
is pursued in patients with ACS.
2018 AHA Scientific Statement
Update on Radial Artery Access
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e000035.
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines
Myocardial Revascularization
European Heart Journal (2018) 00, 1–96