This document discusses the effects of Jupiter and Uranus on the geometry of the solar system. It hypothesizes that Jupiter has a horizontal effect that controls the XY plane and defines the consistency between planetary orbital inclinations. Uranus is proposed to have a vertical effect that defines the Z-axis and prevents planetary overturning motions by forcing same-direction revolution around the sun. Several equations are presented relating planetary data like distances, tilts, and inclinations to Jupiter's energy, circumference, and axial tilt, arguing this supports Jupiter having a dominant horizontal effect on solar system geometry. Uranus' effect is proposed to be seen in the inner planets' data being related to Uranus' 90 degree figures like its 97
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion Gerges francis
Paper Claim
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Force Effect On The Earth Moon = 42% Of The Sun Mass Gravity Force Effect On Pluto
- Because the sun gravity keeps Pluto in its orbit, that tells Jupiter force must have an effect on the Earth moon motion
- Based on that, Jupiter gravity is the second force effect on the Earth moon motion
- Such effect can't be performed, neither by Mars because of its very small mass nor by Saturn because of its far distance
- That tells Jupiter Mass Gravity must have a greater effect on Mars motion than its effect on the Earth moon motion, and That's True and because of that (Mars Eccentricity = 0.094) but (The Moon Eccentricity = 0.055), proving that Jupiter gravity effect on Mars so greater than its effect on the Earth moon motion.
Shortly,
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometrical Features depend On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Many of the solar system geometrical features can be explained only by light motion geometry…..Why?
- To answer this question I suggest the following concepts
(1st Concept) The Matter Is Created By Light Motion Effect – that means – the matter is a form of the light different forms – for example
i. In Young Experiment the light proceed a coherence and produces bright fringes and darks fringes – i.e. – the bright and dark fringes is the output where input is the run rays – that tells us there's some change in light nature causes this change in the output
ii. In the double production experiment – the input is Gamma rays (1.2 Mev) and the output is electron and positron – the output is different because some change is occurred for the light nature (may the change here is to decrease the light velocity where the input is Gamma rays travels by light velocity and the output is electron and positron which can't travel with light velocity
iii. The Conclusion is that – The matter is created by light motion effect – or as some change in the light nature
(2nd Concept) The Space = Energy, that means the distance is created by light motion
- Because of the previous 2 concepts the solar system geometrical features can be explained only based on light motion geometrical rules
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found (Newton is Wrong)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper hypothesis proves
Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong Because
(1) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Transported Among The Planets
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Data Shows A Continuum Effect Through The Planets Motions
(3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(4) The Solar System Distances Be Created In One Network Form
(5) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
(The sun is the planets motions result and not the reason)
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is a wrong theory. And we should remove it from the physics book. The previous proves are discussed in the paper. And they are decisive proves against the theory.
- Of course if the sun be created after all planets creation Newton theory be refuted clearly. But the historical records difficulties will prevent such proof by all means. For that reason we can't depend on this very good proof in our fighting against Newton theory.
- But
- We still have one more decisive proof against Newton which can kill this theory clearly and remove it at end from the physics book. This proof is the continuum effect of the solar planets motions data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion Gerges francis
Paper Claim
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Force Effect On The Earth Moon = 42% Of The Sun Mass Gravity Force Effect On Pluto
- Because the sun gravity keeps Pluto in its orbit, that tells Jupiter force must have an effect on the Earth moon motion
- Based on that, Jupiter gravity is the second force effect on the Earth moon motion
- Such effect can't be performed, neither by Mars because of its very small mass nor by Saturn because of its far distance
- That tells Jupiter Mass Gravity must have a greater effect on Mars motion than its effect on the Earth moon motion, and That's True and because of that (Mars Eccentricity = 0.094) but (The Moon Eccentricity = 0.055), proving that Jupiter gravity effect on Mars so greater than its effect on the Earth moon motion.
Shortly,
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometrical Features depend On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Many of the solar system geometrical features can be explained only by light motion geometry…..Why?
- To answer this question I suggest the following concepts
(1st Concept) The Matter Is Created By Light Motion Effect – that means – the matter is a form of the light different forms – for example
i. In Young Experiment the light proceed a coherence and produces bright fringes and darks fringes – i.e. – the bright and dark fringes is the output where input is the run rays – that tells us there's some change in light nature causes this change in the output
ii. In the double production experiment – the input is Gamma rays (1.2 Mev) and the output is electron and positron – the output is different because some change is occurred for the light nature (may the change here is to decrease the light velocity where the input is Gamma rays travels by light velocity and the output is electron and positron which can't travel with light velocity
iii. The Conclusion is that – The matter is created by light motion effect – or as some change in the light nature
(2nd Concept) The Space = Energy, that means the distance is created by light motion
- Because of the previous 2 concepts the solar system geometrical features can be explained only based on light motion geometrical rules
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found (Newton is Wrong)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper hypothesis proves
Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong Because
(1) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Transported Among The Planets
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Data Shows A Continuum Effect Through The Planets Motions
(3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(4) The Solar System Distances Be Created In One Network Form
(5) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
(The sun is the planets motions result and not the reason)
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is a wrong theory. And we should remove it from the physics book. The previous proves are discussed in the paper. And they are decisive proves against the theory.
- Of course if the sun be created after all planets creation Newton theory be refuted clearly. But the historical records difficulties will prevent such proof by all means. For that reason we can't depend on this very good proof in our fighting against Newton theory.
- But
- We still have one more decisive proof against Newton which can kill this theory clearly and remove it at end from the physics book. This proof is the continuum effect of the solar planets motions data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Moon Orbital Motion Description
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity Force)
- Also the 2nd hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar GroupGerges francis
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group?
Abstract
Paper Claim
- The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken!
Paper question Explanation
- The solar system is one machine and built on one geometrical design – Perfectly – the solar system is similar to a chess board. Not only the planets data be created based on geometrical measurements and calculations but also the solar system distances be created in a network form. That means, every point in the solar system is defined based on one geometrical design.
- The chess board is the best example for the solar system design. If we accept this idea – 2 results will be produced
- (1st Result)
- The Refutation For Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. That's why Nobel Prize Decision 2021 is mistaken. Because
- Newton theory gives clear meaning that, each planet moves independently and no geometrical design be found before the solar system creation. Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is built on the big bang hypothesis tells (the universe be created by some random process) – this is the basic point against Newton – because he told wrong theory and pushed us to think in the wrong direction of thinking.
- Shortly
- There was a design found before the solar system creation and the planets and distances data be created according to this design. That shows Newton theory is so far from the truth.
- Nobel Prize decision for physics 2021 has to create the revolution against Newton theory and description. Where no real progress in the solar system motion understanding during centuries be done because of it. and even the big bang theory be refuted as a proof that we do no progress- that creates the responsibility on the decision makers shoulders and they should face the history evaluation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
The Moon Orbit Is Created In A Triangle Form
The hypothesis explanation
- The moon uses Pythagorean triangle as one of its motion techniques because the moon daily displacement =88000 km, and during 29.5 days the total distance will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference…. But
- (2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km) (the moon apogee radius =0.406 mkm) (1%)
- Based on that, if the moon uses its displacement as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only along month.
- The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that, the real displacement through the orbit be (L =88000 km cos (θ)), and will be shorter than 88000 km enables the moon to revolve around Earth through more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagorean triangle technique creates the moon orbit in a triangle form. (The paper hypothesis)
- The using of Pythagorean triangle is a proved fact otherwise the moon apogee radius should be (r=0.413 mkm) in place of (r=0.406 mkm).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory" Gerges francis
THE GIANT-IMPACT HYPOTHESIS suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis)
The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration"
Shortly
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm
And during this motion
- Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End
- Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead – Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only
- The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The moon uses Pythagorean triangle as one of its motion techniques
-The moon displacement = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference.
- (2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km) (the moon apogee radius =0.406 mkm) (1%)
- According to this data, the moon would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only during a month.
- The moon solves this dilemma by creating an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that, the real displacement through the orbit be (L =88000 km cos (θ)), where (L) will be less than 88000 km and the moon can revolve around Earth through more orbits than its apogee orbit
- The moon using of Pythagorean triangle technique creates the moon orbit in a triangle form.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (II)Gerges francis
Paper Question
-How Can Jupiter Gravity Effect On The Earth Moon Motion?
-Earth Mass Gravity force on its Moon = 8400 x Jupiter mass gravity force on the Earth moon, So how can Jupiter gravity effect on the Earth moon motion?!
-The paper tries to answer this question sufficiently and clearly
Because
-Jupiter gravity effect on the Earth moon motion is A Fact, can't be denied… where the moon orbit is built based on 2 forces and not one force, because of that, there's 2nd force effects on the moon orbit structure and this force is seen in the moon orbit geometrical structure data
So
-This paper provides the explanation to answer How Jupiter can effect on the Earth moon motion, in addition to remind us by the moon orbit structure features which necessitates 2nd force to effect on the moon orbital motion –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions using of different rates of time provides a basic progress in the solar system motion understanding, because
- The solar planets no longer be considered as rigid bodies move by the sun mass gravity effect, Instead
- The solar planets be similar to waterwheels built on one canal, they all rotate by the water motion.
- The matter is created out of light, but the born matter isn't separated from its parent light beam but moves with it by using different rates of time.
- Based on this vision.
- The solar planets and their distances be created out of one light beam, and the planets move one unified general motion in parallel to its parent light beam.
- This theory is proved
- The planets motions different rates of time prove that the planets move one unified general motion.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the planets motions using of different rates of time. And use the theory to explains how the motions data of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn be created.
- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time Is A Feature Resulting By Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
- Because of that,
- The Planets Motions Different Rates Of Time Theory Depends On The Solar System Creation Theory.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Moon Orbital Motion Description
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity Force)
- Also the 2nd hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar GroupGerges francis
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group?
Abstract
Paper Claim
- The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken!
Paper question Explanation
- The solar system is one machine and built on one geometrical design – Perfectly – the solar system is similar to a chess board. Not only the planets data be created based on geometrical measurements and calculations but also the solar system distances be created in a network form. That means, every point in the solar system is defined based on one geometrical design.
- The chess board is the best example for the solar system design. If we accept this idea – 2 results will be produced
- (1st Result)
- The Refutation For Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. That's why Nobel Prize Decision 2021 is mistaken. Because
- Newton theory gives clear meaning that, each planet moves independently and no geometrical design be found before the solar system creation. Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is built on the big bang hypothesis tells (the universe be created by some random process) – this is the basic point against Newton – because he told wrong theory and pushed us to think in the wrong direction of thinking.
- Shortly
- There was a design found before the solar system creation and the planets and distances data be created according to this design. That shows Newton theory is so far from the truth.
- Nobel Prize decision for physics 2021 has to create the revolution against Newton theory and description. Where no real progress in the solar system motion understanding during centuries be done because of it. and even the big bang theory be refuted as a proof that we do no progress- that creates the responsibility on the decision makers shoulders and they should face the history evaluation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
The Moon Orbit Is Created In A Triangle Form
The hypothesis explanation
- The moon uses Pythagorean triangle as one of its motion techniques because the moon daily displacement =88000 km, and during 29.5 days the total distance will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference…. But
- (2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km) (the moon apogee radius =0.406 mkm) (1%)
- Based on that, if the moon uses its displacement as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only along month.
- The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that, the real displacement through the orbit be (L =88000 km cos (θ)), and will be shorter than 88000 km enables the moon to revolve around Earth through more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagorean triangle technique creates the moon orbit in a triangle form. (The paper hypothesis)
- The using of Pythagorean triangle is a proved fact otherwise the moon apogee radius should be (r=0.413 mkm) in place of (r=0.406 mkm).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory" Gerges francis
THE GIANT-IMPACT HYPOTHESIS suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis)
The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration"
Shortly
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm
And during this motion
- Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End
- Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead – Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only
- The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The moon uses Pythagorean triangle as one of its motion techniques
-The moon displacement = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference.
- (2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km) (the moon apogee radius =0.406 mkm) (1%)
- According to this data, the moon would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only during a month.
- The moon solves this dilemma by creating an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that, the real displacement through the orbit be (L =88000 km cos (θ)), where (L) will be less than 88000 km and the moon can revolve around Earth through more orbits than its apogee orbit
- The moon using of Pythagorean triangle technique creates the moon orbit in a triangle form.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (II)Gerges francis
Paper Question
-How Can Jupiter Gravity Effect On The Earth Moon Motion?
-Earth Mass Gravity force on its Moon = 8400 x Jupiter mass gravity force on the Earth moon, So how can Jupiter gravity effect on the Earth moon motion?!
-The paper tries to answer this question sufficiently and clearly
Because
-Jupiter gravity effect on the Earth moon motion is A Fact, can't be denied… where the moon orbit is built based on 2 forces and not one force, because of that, there's 2nd force effects on the moon orbit structure and this force is seen in the moon orbit geometrical structure data
So
-This paper provides the explanation to answer How Jupiter can effect on the Earth moon motion, in addition to remind us by the moon orbit structure features which necessitates 2nd force to effect on the moon orbital motion –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions using of different rates of time provides a basic progress in the solar system motion understanding, because
- The solar planets no longer be considered as rigid bodies move by the sun mass gravity effect, Instead
- The solar planets be similar to waterwheels built on one canal, they all rotate by the water motion.
- The matter is created out of light, but the born matter isn't separated from its parent light beam but moves with it by using different rates of time.
- Based on this vision.
- The solar planets and their distances be created out of one light beam, and the planets move one unified general motion in parallel to its parent light beam.
- This theory is proved
- The planets motions different rates of time prove that the planets move one unified general motion.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the planets motions using of different rates of time. And use the theory to explains how the motions data of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn be created.
- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time Is A Feature Resulting By Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
- Because of that,
- The Planets Motions Different Rates Of Time Theory Depends On The Solar System Creation Theory.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (2nd Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Data Depends On 5 Equations (Revised).pdfGerges francis
Planet Data Depends On 5 Equations (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet data means
- (Planet Mass, Diameter, Orbital Distance, Period, Inclination, Rotation Period And Axial Tilt) (Planet Fact Sheet)
- Planet data be created based on exact equations as a plane creation process.
- The creation process uses exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all other specifications and data
- The paper proves that based on 5 equations the planets data be created
- The paper disproves any random process, initial conditions or unknown historical factors to be effective on the planet data creation.
- On the contrary,
- The paper proves (Based On Exact Equations The Planet Data Be Created)
- The equations are
- (1) Planet Orbital Distance Equation
- d2 = 4 d0 (d-d0)
- d = A Planet Orbital Distance
- d0= Its Direct Previous Neighbor Planet Orbital Distance
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Argument
-Planet motion during its day is a motion defines a distance & a period of time.
- 3 inner planets move during their days periods distances related to each planet orbital circumference, ( Mercury – Venus and The Earth moon).
- The outer planets move during their days periods distances related to each planet circumference.
- Because
- Earth motion distance during its day period = Its moon motion distance during its day =Pluto motion distance during its day =2.58 mkm.
o Earth is the connection point between the (3 planets) & the outer planets.
o By this connection point, the solar system became one unified system.
- The solar system motion depends on Jupiter motion
- (for the inner planets) Jupiter effect makes these planets to move during their days periods distances equal or rated to their orbital circumferences because these planets orbital circumferences = their distances to Jupiter.
-(For the outer planets), the motion is transported from Jupiter to Saturn then to Uranus then to Neptune and to Pluto, (by a rate = 80%)
-The motion transportation is done based on a concept (Planet Moves During Its Day Period A Distance = Its Circumference or rated to it), where the transportation is done by a distance defined by a period of time.
- Based on this description, Jupiter is the basic (planet) motion in the solar system, and its motion is transported from planet to another. This transportation is done in 2 forms. (for the inner planets) and for (the outer planets).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design
(As a result the planets data can be concluded theoretically without observation)
The hypothesis proves
Equation No. (1)
d2 = 4d0 (d-d0)
d = the planet orbital distance
d0 = The direct previous neighbor planet orbital distance
(Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus – Pluto depends on Uranus )
Equation No. (2)
(d1/d2) = (v2¬/v1)2
d1= Planet Orbital Distance (its velocity v1)
d2= Another Planet Orbital Distance (Not Neighbor) (its velocity v2)
Equation No. (3)
(v1/ v2) = s/r
r = Planet Diameter
s = The Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
The Proves Explanation
- Let's summarize the idea in following
- By Equation no. (1) we can conclude all planets orbital distances by using Mercury orbital distance (57.9 mkm) – if we know this data only – we can conclude by Equation no. (1) all planets orbital distances – means planet orbital distance depends n its neighbor orbital distance
- Equation no. (2) gives a extension for our knowledge – because – by Equation no. (2) we can conclude all planets velocities rates – that can help to define the planets orbital periods –
- We notice that, Equation no. (1) depends on planets order – but equation no. (2) doesn't depend on the planets order.
- Equation no. (3) can define planets diameters and rotation periods based on their velocities rate.
- Why do we need these equations?
- If we know (Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm) we can conclude theoretically (1) All Planets Orbital Distances (2) All Planets Velocities Rates and their orbital periods and (3) All Planets Diameters And Rotation Periods
- Why do we need that?
- Because the solar group data proves another vision for it – the planets aren't rigid bodies separated from one another – on the contrary- the planets be similar to parts in one geometrical design or members in one creature body – in more accurate – the planets be similar to stories in one building - they are created based on one another – as you see a child and discovers that its face is similar to its parent – or its eyes are similar to its mother – the persons are separated from one another but the data shows that they are created based on each other –when you look at them and decide they are separated persons – that means you are wrong – Newton is Mistaken –
- Based on this vision, the solar system motion must depend on One Geometrical Design,
- means
- The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages move together. Or similar to ships sail over a sea move by this sea waves
- Also the solar group can be similar to 9 waterwheels be built on one canal and this canal water causes to rotate the 9 waterwheels. (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity Be Refuted Decisively By 2 Facts Which Are:
- (1st Fact) The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion.
- (2nd Fact) The Solar Planets Move A Type Of Motion Different Completely From The Planet Motion Be Described By Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Paper Proves
- The (2nd Fact) is proved by The Solar Planets Motions Analysis.
- While Newton had supposed that, Each planet moves independently from the other planets. The fact is that, the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. by that, The Planets Motions Be similar to The Train Carriages Motion. or similar to A Machine Of Gears Motion.
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis disproves the Motion Independency Concept, showing that, the planets motions be different completely from Newton Motion Description.
- The (1st Fact) which is (The Sun is Created after all Planets Creation and Motion). This Fact disproves Newton Theory decisively. This fact proves are discussed in this paper introduction.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Light Effects On Plant Motion By Undefined Force Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-Light Motion Effects On Planet Motion By Undefined Force
The hypothesis Explanation
-The solar system motions can't be explained by Classical Machines Laws!
-Because Light motion effects on planet motion by undefined force, resulting all classical mechanics laws clearly be violated by planets motions.
Example No. (1)
o Jupiter velocity =13.1 km/sec, i.e. Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter, where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference! And
o (Jupiter orbital circumference = Jupiter circumference x 10921)
o Uranus velocity =6.8 km, i.e. Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = 51118 km = Uranus diameter, where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
o (Uranus Pluto distance =Pluto velocity per solar day x 7511)
Example No. (2)
o 13.18 degrees = the moon motion degrees per solar day/ 0.526 degrees (Mars motion degrees per solar day) =25.2 (where Mars axial tilt =25.2 deg)
o (687 days Mars orbital period = 27.3 days the moon orbital period) x 25.2
Example No. (3)
o Light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) = Earth velocity x 10000 But
o 365.25 days (Earth year) x 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) =10000
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why The Earth Moon Distance = The Planets Diameters Total (III) Gerges francis
Paper Question
Why The Earth Moon Distance (At Apogee Radius) = The Planets Diameters Total?
Because
(1)
The Matter Is Created Based On Its Motion –
That means
The moon daily displacement =88000 km – is the reason based on which– the moon diameter is created to be = 3475 km –
This fact can be proved by analyze Saturn Creation and Motion Data
(Point No. 2 of this paper discusses this question)
(2)
We Still Analyze The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure, Where the moon orbit shows that there's a geometrical design forces the moon to move specific motion and specific displacement daily
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Creation And Motion (Question And Answers) (Part 1).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Creation And Motion (Question And Answers) (Part 1)
Abstract
A Question No. 1
Is There A Simple Proof For Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion?
A Question No. 2
Can The Planets Velocities Be Distributed Based On A Geometrical Design?
A Question No. 3
Is There A Simple Proof For The Solar System Distances Creation In A Network Form?
A Question No. 4
What Proves Are Available For The Existence of The Light Supposed Velocity (1.16mkm/sec)
A Question No. 5
How does Planet velocity be defined? Is There an Equation can be used for all planets velocities?
A Question No. 6
(Planets Velocities Are Created Complementary To One Another)
How to prove this statement?
A Question No. 7
Can Jupiter and Uranus Velocities Be Defined Based On One Another?
A Question No.8
What Basic Points Be Provided By The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit = 2.55 mkm?
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
- also, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) should force the moon to revolve around Earth through it apogee orbit only (r=406000 km) or even further than it (r=413000 km)!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Revised And Modified).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Revised And Modified)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis no. (1)
- The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design
Paper hypothesis no. (2)
- The Solar Planets And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam
Paper hypothesis no. (3)
- This Light Beam Travels With A Velocity 1.16 Million Km Per Second
Paper hypotheses Explanation
- Hypothesis no. (1)
- The hypothesis tells, the solar system be created based on one geometrical design, means, the planets dimensions and data be defined by one equation and can be concluded based on one another – this fact the paper proves clearly –
- The paper provides 4 equations which can be considered as a discovery, by them we can conclude the planets fact sheet theoretically without observation, let's prove that by introducing the first equation of them
- d2= 4d0 (d- d0) where (d =planet orbital distance) and (d0 = previous planet orb. dis.)
- The equation tells, the distance from the sun to Pluto be distributed geometrically in order regardless the planets data – neither their masses nor their diameters – simply the distance be distributed geometrically regardless planets data –
- (The paper tests and proves the equation) - let's provide the 2nd equation
- (d1/d2) = (v2/v1)2 where (d = planet orbital distance) and (v= planet velocity),
- The equation doesn't use the planets order as the first one –
- The 4 equations tells one clear information which is
- If we know (Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm), By use these 4 equations, we can conclude theoretically all planets orbital distances, periods, velocities, their diameters, rotation periods, masses, orbital inclinations and axial tilts. This data we conclude theoretically without observation by these 4 equations
- The next question should be Why? hypothesis no. (2) answers -Because,
- The Solar Planets And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam.
- This is similar to Young Experiment (the double slits experiment), the sun rays produces bright fringes and dark fringes (One Design) (If we accept that, we have to suppose the bright fringes be seen by us as matters and the dark as space)
- The paper proves this fact also, by analysis of Lorentz length contraction effect and tries to answer the question (Why does Particle length be contracted by its high velocity motion?)
- But, the complexity isn't finished
- The light beam based on which the solar planets and their distances be created, this light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second!!
- And how to prove this fact? and from where we know this number 1.16 mkm/s?? (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
We Should Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.pdfGerges francis
We Should Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper Discovery
- Planets data be created based on exact equations and mathematical calculations and doesn't depend on any (historical unknown factors or initial conditions)
- As a result, Planets creation and motion data can be concluded theoretically without observation because it's created based on mathematical equations
- I provide 3 new equations and use one more equation based on Kepler law, by these 4 equations using we can conclude All planets orbital distances, periods, velocities, inclinations, rotation periods, diameters, masses and axial tilts…
- This Data Can Be Concluded Theoretically Without Observation.
- The paper tests these 4 equations and proves this discovery
Paper Theory
- The Solar system be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- Means, based on one design all planets creation and motion data be created and by that the planets be parts in one building (or members in one body)
- Can one law control all planets creation and motion data?
- Let's suppose, The Planets Move A Unified Motion (as a machine of gears). This unified motion will force each planet to move a complementary motion to others' to enable the unified motion to be created.
- Planet data should be in consistency with its motion – otherwise – this planet will be destroyed. Means, if planets motions be complementary one another that will cause these planets creation and motion data to be complementary one another, by this vision, One Law controls all planets creation and motion data
- The paper theory tells, the solar system be created based on one geometrical design and be controlled by one law, for that reason the planets data be created based on exact equations – let's refer to these 4 equations in following
- My (1st Equation) d2 = 4d0 ( d- d0)
- d = Planet Orbital Distance d0= Its Previous Planet Orbital Distance
- the equation tells each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor
- (Kepler Law) Equation (v1/v2)2 = (d2/d1)
- v = Planet Velocity d= Planet Orbital Distance
- The equation tells planet orbit defines its velocity
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Similar to Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
The increased availability of biomedical data, particularly in the public domain, offers the opportunity to better understand human health and to develop effective therapeutics for a wide range of unmet medical needs. However, data scientists remain stymied by the fact that data remain hard to find and to productively reuse because data and their metadata i) are wholly inaccessible, ii) are in non-standard or incompatible representations, iii) do not conform to community standards, and iv) have unclear or highly restricted terms and conditions that preclude legitimate reuse. These limitations require a rethink on data can be made machine and AI-ready - the key motivation behind the FAIR Guiding Principles. Concurrently, while recent efforts have explored the use of deep learning to fuse disparate data into predictive models for a wide range of biomedical applications, these models often fail even when the correct answer is already known, and fail to explain individual predictions in terms that data scientists can appreciate. These limitations suggest that new methods to produce practical artificial intelligence are still needed.
In this talk, I will discuss our work in (1) building an integrative knowledge infrastructure to prepare FAIR and "AI-ready" data and services along with (2) neurosymbolic AI methods to improve the quality of predictions and to generate plausible explanations. Attention is given to standards, platforms, and methods to wrangle knowledge into simple, but effective semantic and latent representations, and to make these available into standards-compliant and discoverable interfaces that can be used in model building, validation, and explanation. Our work, and those of others in the field, creates a baseline for building trustworthy and easy to deploy AI models in biomedicine.
Bio
Dr. Michel Dumontier is the Distinguished Professor of Data Science at Maastricht University, founder and executive director of the Institute of Data Science, and co-founder of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. His research explores socio-technological approaches for responsible discovery science, which includes collaborative multi-modal knowledge graphs, privacy-preserving distributed data mining, and AI methods for drug discovery and personalized medicine. His work is supported through the Dutch National Research Agenda, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Horizon Europe, the European Open Science Cloud, the US National Institutes of Health, and a Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network. He is the editor-in-chief for the journal Data Science and is internationally recognized for his contributions in bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and semantic technologies including ontologies and linked data.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –6th
June 2020
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Coordinates have 3 Axis –XY Plane Is Controlled By Jupiter
Effect – And Z-Axis Is Defined By Uranus Effect
The Hypothesis Explanation:
Uranus Effect
- Uranus effects on the solar system vertically
- Uranus effects on the planets axial tilts by a vertical force –
- Uranus Effect on the planets aims to prevent any overturn motion can be done
by any planet around the sun and by that Uranus forces the planets to revolve
around the sun in the same direction – by this effect- Uranus unifies the planets
to revolve around the sun in the same direction
- Uranus effect is seen on the solar system geometry coordinates on Z-axis
Jupiter Effect
- Jupiter effect horizontally on the solar System Geometry
- Jupiter effect on the planets motions aims to provide the consistency between
the planets orbital inclinations to save the planets revolutions around the sun in
the same direction
Means
- Because of Jupiter horizontal effect on the solar system geometry– the planets
don't collide each other through their revolutions around the sun because Jupiter
produce the orbital inclinations consistency between all planets Motions
- Jupiter effect is seen on the solar system geometry coordinates on XY-Plain
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
1- Introduction
Does Uranus Axial Tilt Perpendicular On The Earth Moon Axial Tilt?
Because
Uranus Axial Tilt = 97.8 degrees but The Earth Moon axial tilt = 6.7 degrees
97.8 – 6.7 = 91.1 degrees – not perpendicular accurately but almost!
The question is raised because Uranus data is seen frequently with the 90 degrees –
for example
Equation No. (A)
180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) +3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)
But 180.8 degrees = 90 deg +90 deg + 0.8 deg (Uranus orbital Inclination)
This equation tells that Venus orbital inclination and axial tilt are defined by Uranus
Data effect (Specifically Uranus orbital inclination)
Equation No. (B)
97.8 degrees Uranus axial tilt) = 90 deg +0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination) + 7
degrees (Mercury orbital inclination) –
This equation tells that – Uranus axial tilt (97.8 deg) is seen in the inner planets as
(7.8 deg) because Uranus axial tilt is perpendicular on the inner planets and Uranus
effect by this perpendicularity position on the inner planets motions data
This idea and data we have discussed before let's remember the concept behind
Uranus effects on the planets by vertical effect – means Uranus effect is
found Vertically on the solar system geometry – this vertical effect is an
essential one for the planets revolution around the sun because it prevents
the overturn motions can be done by any planet around the sun
Uranus has different basic effects on the solar system – but in this paper we compare
between Uranus and Jupiter effect on the solar system geometry – where Uranus
effect vertically and Jupiter effect horizontally
The paper discusses this concept as deep as possible
Paper Contents
2- Jupiter effects horizontally on the solar system Geometry
3- Uranus effects vertically on the solar system Geometry
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
2- Jupiter effects horizontally on the solar system Geometry
I-Data
Group No. 1
(I)
200448 mkm (Jupiter Energy) =
= 670.4 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance) x 299.2 mkm (Earth Orbital diameter)
= 928 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance) x 216.4 mkm (Venus orbital diameter)
= 5848 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance) x 2 x 17.2 (Pluto orbital inclination)
(II)
200448 mkm (Jupiter Energy) = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) x 41
(III)
200448 mkm (Jupiter Energy) = 720 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance) x 278.4
Group No. 2
(IV)
3.1 deg (Jupiter axial tilt) = 1.3 deg (Jupiter orbital inclination) +1.8 deg (Neptune
orbital inclination)
(V)
17.4 degrees (the inner planets orbital inclinations total) = 1.3 x 13.4
(VI)
41 deg (the planets orbital inclinations total) = 13.1 x 3.1 deg (Jupiter axial tilt)
(VII)
63.7 degrees (The Sun Declination) = 1.3 degrees (Jupiter orbital inclination) x 72
(7 degrees = Mercury orbital inclination)
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
II-Discussion
Please review
Mercury Jupiter Motions Interaction
https://www.academia.edu/43269163/Mercury_Jupiter_Motions_Interaction
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/mercury-jupiter-motions-interaction
Is Jupiter The Solar System Parent? (Jupiter Energy Analysis)
https://www.academia.edu/43030586/Is_Jupiter_The_Solar_System_Parent_Jupiter_Energy_Analysis_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/is-jupiter-the-solar-system-parent-jupiter-energy-analysis
Group No. 1
Equation No. I
Jupiter energy – as we have discussed frequently before – is a distance =200448
mkm – and this distance is very specific – because (200448 mkm = 2 x the planets
orbital circumferences total)
And
200448 mkm = 670.4 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance) x 299.2 mkm (Earth Orbital
diameter) = 928 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance) x 216.4 mkm (Venus orbital diameter)
Where
928 mkm =Earth Jupiter distance when both be at 2 sides from the sun – that means –
(928 mkm =778.6 mkm+ 149.6 mkm) –
940 = Earth Orbital Circumference
And
670.4 mkm = Venus Jupiter Distance 680 mkm= Venus Orbital Circumference
That supports my claim – that – Mercury , Earth and Venus define their orbital
circumferences to be equal (or depend on their distances to Jupiter)
The previous data is a decisive to prove this fact because
Earth Jupiter distance, Earth orbital circumference, Venus Jupiter distance and Venus
orbital circumference – all this data is controlled by the same 200448 mkm – which
shows the original energy behind from which all these distances are created
Please review the aforementioned papers because Jupiter energy has rich details can't
be repeated here again – so this paper analysis considers that the previous data is
known already – this notice is necessary because –the value 200448 mkm may be a
result of the previous distances multiplication (by some pure coincidences)
But the other data shows that – this conclusion is absolutely wrong – because – the
value 200448 mkm is a player in huge number of data concerning the same planets
which shows clearly the data direction and supports the claim.
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
Note Please
That can be more clear with the value 4222.6 revision
Where we have found before that
4222.6 mkm = 2π x 670 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance)
And
(5040 seconds / 4222.6 seconds) = 928 mkm /778.6 mkm
Where
778.6 mkm = Jupiter orbital distance
5040 seconds = a period required to make Mercury Day period = 176 days
Mercury moves during its day period (175.94 days) a distance = 720 mkm = Mercury
Jupiter Distance
And
Jupiter moves during Mercury day period (175.94 days) a distance = 200 mkm =
(Earth Jupiter distance directly 637 mkm /2π)
Equation No. II
200448 mkm (Jupiter Energy) = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) x 41
41 degrees = The Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
This equation we have seen before – it tells that – Jupiter energy relative to Jupiter
orbital circumference produces the rate 41 which can be the planets orbital
inclinations total
This is one basic and essential equation because – the planets orbital inclinations total
are produced based on Jupiter Data Only – which shows clearly Jupiter effect
horizontally on the planets motions
Equation No. III
200448 mkm (Jupiter Energy) = 720 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance) x 278.4
278.4 degrees = The Outer Planets Axial Titles Total
We have seen a similar equation before let's remember it
(5040 mkm /720 mkm) = 7 where Mercury orbital Inclination =7 degrees
Now
Jupiter moves during its orbital period (4331 days) a distance =5040 mkm
(approximately)
Mercury moves during its day period a distance = 720 mkm
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
That tells us – Mercury orbital inclination is produced as a rate between Jupiter and
Mercury Motions - now - this explanation is a general one because if we need to
define specifically which motion of Jupiter works relative to which motion of
Mercury to produce this rate 7 we need to define the rates of time for each planet to
the other – and because the solar system has different rates of time (as I claim) that
shows difficulties to define specifically why Jupiter motion (5040 mkm) to mercury
motion (720 mkm) produces Mercury orbital inclination
Let's return to our equation
200448 mkm (Jupiter Energy) = 720 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance) x 278.4
Based on the distance 720 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance) the rate 278.4 is produced
where the outer planets axial tilts total =278.4 degrees –
So the outer planets axial tilts total should be produced by Jupiter effect (and Not
Uranus!) – this may disprove the paper claim – but it's not true – the definition of the
planets axial tilts total is done by Jupiter and Uranus interactions –
Group No. 2
Equation No. IV
3.1 deg (Jupiter axial tilt) = 1.3 deg (Jupiter orbital inclination) +1.8 deg (Neptune
orbital inclination)
The equation tells that – Neptune orbital inclination is produced by Jupiter Data only
and that's correct because Neptune orbital circumference is produced by Jupiter
energy – as we have seen in Jupiter energy analysis where Neptune used 14% of it to
produce its orbital circumference
Equation No. V
17.4 degrees (the inner planets orbital inclinations total) = 1.3 x 13.4
13.1 km/sec = Jupiter velocity per second
1.3 degrees = Jupiter orbital inclination
17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination) = 17.4 degrees x 0.99
Note Please
The rate 13.1 is so specific in Jupiter Data basically because (Jupiter diameter / Earth
Moon Circumference =13.1) – because of that the value 13.1 km/sec (Jupiter velocity)
is a result and not a reason – Jupiter created its velocity to be in consistency with the
Moon and Earth data -
Now the rate 13.4 (with difference 2.2% with 13.1) is found basically between Earth
and Moon where (Earth orbital period / the moon orbital period) =13.4
Jupiter effects on the cooperative motions of Earth and its moon to produce these
motions in full consistency- the following data may support this claim
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
More Data
1. The Moon Circumference x Jupiter Circumference = Jupiter orbital circumference
- The Moon Diameter x The sun Diameter = Jupiter orbital circumference
2. Jupiter Diameter / the moon Circumference=13.1
3. 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) =13.1 x 329.8 days
4. 29.2 days / 2.23 days =13.1
5. 2x 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) =25.2 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
6. 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = π x687 days (Mars orbital Period)
7. 1461 days /2.23 days = π2
x (655.7 h/9.9 h)
8. Jupiter Mass / the Moon Mass =25920
9. 6.7 deg (the Moon axial tilt) /5.1 deg =1.3
The previous 9 data we have discussed deeply in the previous paper –
To consider any number in few words will cause nothing more than the confusion
because each equation of this list is a complex discussion ….
I may refer to Equation No. 3 because it's the most simple and clear one….
(3) 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) =13.1 x 329.8 days
13.1 = Jupiter diameter / the moon circumference
329.8 days = the moon sidereal year (327.6 days) added to it 2.23 days why?
because this sidereal year ended with a synodic month (29.53 days)
the equation no. (3) tells that – Jupiter orbital period is relative to the moon sidereal
year based on the rate of their diameter( and circumference) – what's the relationship
between the planet diameter and orbital period? I don't know – I have seen that before
(Earth Orbital Period 365.25 / The Moon Orbital Period27.3 ) = (Earth
Diameter/ The Moon Diameter)2
If Earth orbital period is created relative to its moon orbital period based on the
previous equation so this same equation is used with Jupiter – but in place of the
sidereal month Jupiter used the sidereal year! if both equation are coincidences – no
problem…
Equation No. VI
41 deg (the planets orbital inclinations total) = 13.1 x 3.1 deg (Jupiter axial tilt)
This equation is supported by the previous discussion
But basically is supported by the equation
200448 mkm (Jupiter Energy) =4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) x 41
Simply
41 degrees = The Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
This value is defined by Jupiter Data effect – and because of that the value 41 is seen
frequently in Jupiter data
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
Equation No. VII
(VII)
63.7 degrees (The Sun Declination) = 1.3 degrees (Jupiter orbital inclination) x 72
(7 degrees = Mercury orbital inclination)
Please Note
Mercury orbital inclination 7 degrees is so specific value in the solar system- because
if produced by interaction between Jupiter and Mercury motions
(5040 mkm/720 mkm)
And because Jupiter diameter is created by (1 million km/ 7) =142984 km
Still the number 5040 seconds is the require value to make Mercury day period =176
solar days
And the value 720 mkm is so specific one because it's the contracted value from 778.6
mkm = Jupiter orbital distance and because the light with supposed velocity 1.16
mkm/sec travels during 4222.6 seconds a distance = 4900 mkm = Jupiter orbital
Circumference –
All that makes the distance 720 mkm is so specific distance and so effective on the
solar system geometry
It's hard to explain why the sun pole declination is produced by the interaction
between 1.3 degrees and 7 degrees – as it's also hard to explain why the sun diameter
= Jupiter diameter x π2
The sun creation theory is needed to be reviewed that because – as I claim –the sun
energy is produced by the planets motions energies total – that means – the planets
mechanical waves energies are transformed into light waves energy – we have
discussed that before deeply
Please review The Sun Creation Reason And Effect https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0372
The paper Conclusion
What effect Jupiter does on the solar planets motions by its horizontal effect?
Jupiter creates the consistency between the planets motions data in their revolutions
around that –
i.e. While Uranus effects vertically on the planets motions to prevent the overturn
motion to be done by any planet and so Uranus unifies the planets to revolve around
the sun in the same direction
Jupiter effects horizontally to creates the distribution of the planets orbital inclinations
and by that the planets don't collide each other while they revolve around the sun.
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
degrees1461
TiltAxailMercurydeg0.01
1
TiltAxailMoonThedeg6.7
TiltAxailUranusdeg.97.8
=x
3- Uranus effects vertically on the solar system Geometry
Let's summarize the idea in following:
- Uranus Effect Geometrically is A Vertical Effect
- Uranus effects On The Planets Axial Tilts
- Uranus Vertical Effect Aims To Prevent Any Overturn Motion Vertically To
Be Done By Any Planet Around The Sun
- By that, Uranus helps to unify the planets revolutions direction around the sun.
Now – let's prove this idea in following:
I- Data
(1)
(2)
90.8 degrees = 0.8 degrees x 113.45 degrees
(3)
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) = 90 +1.1 degrees +6.7 degrees (Moon Axial Tilt)
(4)
97.8 degrees = 90 degrees + 7.8 degrees
(5)
98.6 deg. x 5.18 deg. (Moon orbital inclin.) = 511.1 deg. (Planets Axial Tilts Total)
(6)
98.6 deg. x 1.8 deg. (Neptune orbital inclination) = 177.4 deg. (Venus Axial Tilt)
(98.6 degrees = 97.8 deg Uranus axial tilt +0.8 deg Uranus orbital inclination)
(7)
97.8 deg (Uranus axial tilt)= 0.8 deg (Uranus Orbit.) x 122.5 deg (Pluto Axial Tilt)
(8)
23.45 deg (Earth Axial Tilt) = 29.2 degrees x 0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination)
(9)
1.44 degrees = 1.8 degrees x 0.8 degrees
(10)
97.8 = 19 x5.15 and 98.6 =19 x 5.18 and 511.1 = 98.6 x 5.18
(11)
0725.1
degrees91.25
T.AxailUranus97.8
T.AxailEarth23.4
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailNeptune28.3
====
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
II- Discussion
Let's simply this discussion as possible –
Equation No. (1)
At first, I don't create the ideas, I try to explain how the data is created
As we see many planets axial tilts are rated with Uranus Data
97.8 degrees = Uranus axial tilt but what's 91.25 degrees?
0.8 degrees = Uranus orbital inclination so (1/0.8 degrees) = 1.25 degrees – so on
Vertical level 1.25 degrees +90 degrees = 91.25 degrees
That means
The equation (97.8 deg/91.25 deg) express Uranus Data only – and based on it many
planet axial tilts are rated- Why?
I conclude that – Uranus has an effect on The Planets Axial Tilts –
Equation No. (2)
90.8 degrees = 0.8 degrees (Mercury orbital inclination) x 113.45 degrees
90.8 degrees = Uranus orbital inclination vertically =0.8 degrees +90 degrees
113.45 degrees = Earth axial tilt 23.45 degrees +90 degrees (Vertically)
The Equation shows the vertical effect of Uranus on Earth Axial Tilt (23.45 deg)
Please note / the simple explanations I provide here try just to explain how the data is
created – so no confirmation that this data is created by this explanation – but I try to
find a physical or geometrical explanation in place of to claim that the data is created
by (pure coincidence)
My basic tool to help this explanation is the rich of Data –that means – when we find
many equations shows the angle 90 degrees is used frequently with Uranus Data –
that may gives some credibility that Uranus is perpendicular or use some
perpendicular effect on the other planets –
Now – the next question is – why the solar system needs a perpendicular effect? – the
absent motion in the solar system is the overturn vertical motion which no planet
does– so may Uranus vertical effect prevents this overturn vertical motion– and by
such analysis we reach to the conclusion –still the argument depends on the data – and
any new data can change its conclusions
0725.1
degrees91.25
T.AxailUranus97.8
T.AxailEarth23.4
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailNeptune28.3
====
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
degrees1461
TiltAxailMercurydeg0.01
1
TiltAxailMoonThedeg6.7
TiltAxailUranusdeg.97.8
=x
Equation No. (3)
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) = 90 +1.1 degrees +6.7 degrees (Moon Axial Tilt)
This equation tells that – Uranus axial tilt is (almost) perpendicular on Earth Moon
axial tilt
That supports the same meaning –
Please note
Equation No.2 shows Earth Axial Tilt on vertical level (113.45 degrees) and this
equation tells that Uranus is Perpendicular on the Moon axial tilt (almost)
I wish we see the same wave of data
Here we don’t deal with some random data is created by any pure coincidence
On the contrary we deal with arranged and directed data is created by a clear effect
That means – the data is created by Uranus effect
Equation No. (4)
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) = 90 degrees + 7.8 degrees
7.8 degrees = 7 degree (Mercury orbital inclination) + 0.8 degrees (Uranus orbital
inclination)
This equation shows Uranus is perpendicular on Mercury – that lead us to conclude
that – Uranus is almost perpendicular on the inner planets – that explain the different
data we deal with here
Equation No. (5)
98.6 deg. x 5.18 deg. (Moon orbital inclin.) = 511.1 deg. (Planets Axial Tilts Total)
98.6 degrees = 97.8 deg (Uranus axial tilt) +0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination)
511.1 deg. ( All Planets Axial Tilts Total)
The previous equation shows clearly Uranus Effect On The Planets Axial Tilts Total
Of course the Equation gives the Earth Moon orbital inclination so specific position
also – but that means because – Uranus axial tilt is (almost) perpendicular directly on
The Earth Moon axial tilt and that shows moon specific important for Uranus!
Equation No.11 shows that even more clear
Equation No. (11)
Earth Cycle =1461 days =365 days+365 days +365 days +366 days
If 1 day = 1 degree
So the previous 3 axial tilts unify their powers to produce this Cycle 1461 days
Where we find 1 degree = 1 day? In the Earth moon orbit because the moon orbit
regresses yearly 19 degrees and that cause change in the eclipse colander 19 days
A Conclusion
The data shows a clear consistency between Uranus data and the plants axial Tilts –
supports the idea that Uranus effects vertically on the planets axial tilts to prevent any
overturn motion to be done by any planet.
Let's analyze Uranus effect on Mars Migration in following…
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
Uranus Effect on Mars Migration
I- Data
(1)
Venus Diameter 12104 km = Mars diameter 6792 km x
(2)
3.4 degrees (Venus orbital inclination) x 0.524 degree =
(3)
177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) = 100 x
(4)
180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)
(5)
Mars moves during Venus days (116.7 days) a distance =243 mkm = Mercury Motion
during Mercury rotation period (58.66 days)
(6)
116.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt vertically) =26.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt horizontally) x 4.37
(4.37 mkm = the sun circumference)
(7)
(Nodal Year/ Lunar Sidereal Year) =(Earth Diameter / Venus Diameter)
(8)
(Lunar Synodic Year / Nodal Year)= (Mercury Radius / Pluto Diameter)
(9)
687 days Mars orbital period +6.2 days = 2 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
(3.1 degrees = Jupiter Axial Tilt)
II- Discussion
To understand how this data works – we have to discuss the equation No. (4)
This is the main equation behind all changes happened for Mars and even for many
other planets data
Let's try to see its depth in following
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
Equation No. (4)
180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)
(1)
What's this 180.8 degrees?
It's Uranus orbital inclination (0.8 degrees)
0.8 degrees +90 +90 =180.8 degrees!
What does that mean?
Uranus is perpendicular on Earth Moon orbit – we discussed that before
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) – 6.7 degrees (Earth Moon axial tilt) = 91.1 deg
Not perfectly perpendicular – how to be equal 90 degrees? We discussed that before
Now
The sun is perpendicular on Earth…!
That means – the Sun and Uranus are 2 points on the same straight line – for that
reason the value 180.8 degrees is seen
(2)
90000 mkm = C2
when?? When the time =1 second
90000 mkm = π3
x 2872.5 mkm (Uranus Orbital Distance)
where π3
= (Uranus axial tilt / Jupiter axial tilt)
The Sun rays are produced from C2
That means – the sun is created with the distance 2872.5 mkm – i.e. the sun and the
distance 2872.5 mkm are created together in the same equation – and that makes
Uranus is the first planet connected with the sun after creation
This is the reason – Why Uranus is the governor of the heaven!
(3)
Let's return to the equation
180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)
Venus data (axial tilt and orbital inclination) are created based on Uranus orbital
inclination- So the value 180.8 degrees is transported to Venus
Shortly –
Uranus sent to Venus his instruction and Venus told Mars them!
How??
179.9 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination)
So 180.8 degrees - 179.9 degrees =0.9 degrees !!
About what we fight here?
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
About 0.1 degrees
Please remember
1.9 deg = Mars orbital inclination = 1.8 deg (Neptune orbital inclination) +0.1 deg
Why we need it?
Because by the rate 1.9 – Mars (New) diameter =6792 km will be created and then
Mars will remember forever that he has to move daily 0.524 degrees
And what we have? 0.9 degrees !! So
1 degree = 0.9 degrees + 0.1 degree
Where is the 1 degree??
Let's tell the story
Mercury Axial Tilt was 1 degree and Pluto was Mercury Moon – in that time – Mars
was the next planet after Mercury – Venus axial tilt was (π)1/2
With The Sun Creation – some great changes were done – as following:
- Mercury axial tilt became 0.01 degrees
- Venus axial tilt received this difference to save the planet data for that (π)1/2
=
1.774 degrees became 177.4 degrees
- The decreasing of Mercury axial tilt from 1 degree to 0.01 degree forced Pluto
to move far from Mercury with 1 orbital distance (57.9 mkm) for each point of
the difference from 1 to 0.01 that means Pluto had to move 57.9 mkm x 100
- One more important change was happened – the basic value 180 degrees is
changed to be 179.9 degrees – that means – no any triangle (for example) in the
solar system its angles total =180 degrees – No one – the solar system lost
already the value 0.1 degree and because of that the solar system machine has
to depend on the value 179.9 degrees which is created by Venus & Saturn
cooperation.
Let's remember the question…what's this 1 degree? Mercury Axial Tilt – no longer
is found- but what- is it removed from the geometrical structure?- No it works in the
solar system geometrical structure but not seen as the other data – Mercury kept its
impression – 360 mkm = Mercury orbital circumference = 360 degrees
Also based on Mercury (supposed) axial tilt (1 degree) Jupiter diameter is created
1 million km / 7 = 142984 km =Jupiter diameter
Also Jupiter orbital circumference 4879 mkm = Mercury diameter 4879 km x 1
mkm
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
(4)
97.8 deg (Uranus axial tilt) = 90 +7.8 degrees
7.8 deg = 7 deg (Mercury orbital inclination) + 0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination)
The previous equation shows Uranus effect on Mercury orbital inclination
Shortly
The inner planets were effected by the sun creation process – and this effect is done
by Uranus effect on the inner planets data
(5)
Saturn is Uranus right hand –
Through Saturn and based on it Uranus can practice its great effect on the inner
planets
That explains why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
(6)
That may explain the equation No. (6)
116.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt vertically) =26.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt horizontally) x 4.37
(4.37 mkm = the sun circumference)
i.e. Mars New Motion is defined before Mars migration and the planets data was
changed to work as bridge to transport the defined motion from Uranus to Mars
This process is done basically depend on Venus and Saturn
That explain
Why Mars orbital circumference = Saturn orbital distance
That also can explain the following data
- Saturn Diameter 120536 km =Venus Diameter 12104 km x π2
- Saturn Orbital Distance 1433.5 mkm = (Venus Circumference)2
(Error 1%)
- Saturn Mass = Venus Mass x 116.75 (where 116.75 days = Venus Day Period)
- 116.75 deg = 26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) +90 degrees
Note Please
- In Kepler 3rd
Law (p2
/ d3
= constant) –when we use the solar planets data in this
law – the constant will be =25
- Where Mars axial tilt =25.2 degrees – and we know that Mercury axial tilt was
1 degree and because of that (25.2 degrees /1 degree) = 25.2
- This explains the great configuration between mars and the other planets after
Mars immigration.
Please review
Uranus Effect On Mars Migration https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0421
Uranus Effect On Mars Migration (II) https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0443
Uranus Effect On Mars Migration (III) https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0481
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
References
Is There A Parallel Universe (I)
https://www.academia.edu/43150627/Is_There_A_Parallel_Universe
"Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?"
https://www.academia.edu/43133509/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-the-gravity-forces-create-the-moon-orbit
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43140027/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-the-gravity-forces-create-the-moon-orbit-ii
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous