Case # 638F
Significance Review
704 Ogden
Presented By: Jason Lutz
Community Development Services Director
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item #10
September 12, 2016
CASE NO. 638F
 Consider a request of Lynn Marie
Mayfield Campaigne, owner, for the
significance review of the structure(s)
located at 704 Ogden Lane under
Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860
(April 12, 2010) in order to demolish
100% of the existing main structure.
SUMMARY
 Demolish 100% of the existing main
structure.
4
BACKGROUND
 Zoned SF-B
 Southeast corner of Ogden Ln. and Viesca
View.
 2014 the property and adjacent property to
the east were subdivided (via metes &
bounds description) without City Approval
and was not platted.
5
6
POLICY ANALYSIS
 The existing 1,997 sq. ft. home was built in
1942.
 No evidence that the home was
 built by a noted architect
 belongs to a distinct architectural style
 or has any major historical significance
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ARB RECOMMENDATION
 Found no significance in the existing
structures
 Approved as requested
14
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
 Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,
appropriate notice was posted on the City
website and a sign was posted on the
property
 Responses received:
 Support: (2)
 Oppose: (1)
QUESTIONS?

Item #10 704 Ogden Lane

  • 1.
    Case # 638F SignificanceReview 704 Ogden Presented By: Jason Lutz Community Development Services Director City Council Meeting Agenda Item #10 September 12, 2016
  • 2.
    CASE NO. 638F Consider a request of Lynn Marie Mayfield Campaigne, owner, for the significance review of the structure(s) located at 704 Ogden Lane under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010) in order to demolish 100% of the existing main structure.
  • 3.
    SUMMARY  Demolish 100%of the existing main structure.
  • 4.
    4 BACKGROUND  Zoned SF-B Southeast corner of Ogden Ln. and Viesca View.  2014 the property and adjacent property to the east were subdivided (via metes & bounds description) without City Approval and was not platted.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    6 POLICY ANALYSIS  Theexisting 1,997 sq. ft. home was built in 1942.  No evidence that the home was  built by a noted architect  belongs to a distinct architectural style  or has any major historical significance
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    13 ARB RECOMMENDATION  Foundno significance in the existing structures  Approved as requested
  • 14.
    14 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION  Postcardswere mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of the property, appropriate notice was posted on the City website and a sign was posted on the property  Responses received:  Support: (2)  Oppose: (1)
  • 15.