This document is a case report for a request to demolish all existing structures at 220 Grove Place. It summarizes that the owner wants to demolish the main 1,285 square foot home built in 1930 and a detached accessory structure. The Architectural Review Board reviewed the request and found no architectural significance in the structures, approving the demolition. The report provides background on zoning and location and analyzes removal of several trees, including one heritage tree that will require mitigation. Public notification was conducted and City Council's consideration of the request is agendized.

1. Case # 641F
Significance Review
220 Grove Place
Presented By: Jason Lutz
Community Development Services Director
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item #5
September 26, 2016

2. CASE NO. 641F
 Consider a request of Omar David Land,
owner, for the significance review of the
existing structure(s) located at 220
Grove Place under Demolition Review
Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010) in
order to demolish 100% of the existing
main and accessory structures.

3. SUMMARY
 Demolish 100% of the existing main
structure and detached accessory
structure.

4. 4
BACKGROUND
 Zoned MF-D
 Southwest corner of Grove Place and
N. New Braunfels Ave.

5. 5

6. 6
POLICY ANALYSIS
 The existing 1,285 sq. ft. home was built in
1930.
 No evidence that the home was
 built by a noted architect
 belongs to a distinct architectural style
 or has any major historical significance

7. 7
POLICY ANALYSIS
 Tree Removal
 19” Pecan
 23” Pecan
 22” Pecan
 20” Pecan
 No mitigation required

8. 8
POLICY ANALYSIS
 Heritage Tree Removal
 29” Pecan
 Mitigation required
 Final mitigation to be determined
during ARB Final Review

9. 9
ARB RECOMMENDATION
 On August 16, 2016, ARB reviewed the
request for demolition, found no
significance in the existing structures, and
approved the demo request.

10. 10

11. 11

12. 12

13. 13

14. 14
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
 Postcards were mailed to property owners within
a 200-foot radius of the property, appropriate
notice was posted on the City website and a sign
was posted on the property
 Responses received:
 Support: (2)
 Oppose: (1)
 Neutral: (1)

15. QUESTIONS?