The cross-national IR 2.0 study conducted by the University of Leipzig / Department Communication Management in summer 2011 focused on company-owned investor relations websites as well as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and SlideShare usage for IR purposes by the 150 largest companies listed in DAX, CAC, FTSE, DJIA and Nikkei. The content analysis revealed usage patterns and identified tools, topics, and intensity of use, dialogical approaches and functions. An engagement index offered the possibility for ranking lists within the indices as well as among the different countries. Additionally, the influence of industrial sectors or sales markets was tested.
How to make social media work for Investor Relations - January 31, 2012Darrell Heaps
Darrell Heaps, co-founder and CEO of Q4 Web Systems (Q4), leads a session aiming to equip IRO's with the knowledge and tools to start tackling these tough questions. Social media can be a powerful tool — make sure it is one working FOR you and not against you.
Investor Relations 2 0 - Global Benchmark Study 2012 - University of LeipzigKristin Koehler
Empirical study investigating how corporations in the United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Japan use social media for financial communications, both on their own websites and on external platforms including mobile channels. Global benchmark of 190 companies including the 150 largest firms listed on DJIA (Dow Jones Industrial Average, USA), FTSE (Financial Times London Stock Exchange Index, UK), CAC (Cotation Assistée en Continu quarante, France), DAX (Deutscher Aktien-Index, Germany), NIKKEI (Nihon Keizai Shimbun Index, Japan), as well as the top 10 companies in regard to market cap, and the top 10 companies in regard to performance of the US mid- and small-cap indices Russell Midcap and Russell 2000. As the third annual study in a row, this research provides longitudinal data and in-depth analysis based on content analysis and statistical evaluation. Authors: Ansgar Zerfass and Kristin Koehler, University of Leipzig, Germany.
NIRI Capital Social Media and Investor Relations - January 6, 2010Darrell Heaps
Slides from a presentation I gave to the NIRI Capital Area Chapter on Jan 6, 2010. Some of the slides are repetitive from previous presentations. Includes an overview of the recent trends of how social media is being used for investor relations.
NYSE/Q4 Webinar: Social Media & IR Website Best PracticesQ4 Web Systems
In collaboration with the NYSE, on June 26, 2012, Darrell Heaps, CEO of Q4 Web Systems, discussed best practice examples of companies who use their IR website and social media to maximize their online communications efforts.
Listen in and you'll:
1. Discover the most recent trends in online communications.
2. Learn how an integrated approach using the IR website and social media can help expand your reach and attract and influence investors.
3. Find out what tools, channels and tactics should be employed to maximize an integrated approach to online communications.
How to make social media work for Investor Relations - January 31, 2012Darrell Heaps
Darrell Heaps, co-founder and CEO of Q4 Web Systems (Q4), leads a session aiming to equip IRO's with the knowledge and tools to start tackling these tough questions. Social media can be a powerful tool — make sure it is one working FOR you and not against you.
Investor Relations 2 0 - Global Benchmark Study 2012 - University of LeipzigKristin Koehler
Empirical study investigating how corporations in the United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Japan use social media for financial communications, both on their own websites and on external platforms including mobile channels. Global benchmark of 190 companies including the 150 largest firms listed on DJIA (Dow Jones Industrial Average, USA), FTSE (Financial Times London Stock Exchange Index, UK), CAC (Cotation Assistée en Continu quarante, France), DAX (Deutscher Aktien-Index, Germany), NIKKEI (Nihon Keizai Shimbun Index, Japan), as well as the top 10 companies in regard to market cap, and the top 10 companies in regard to performance of the US mid- and small-cap indices Russell Midcap and Russell 2000. As the third annual study in a row, this research provides longitudinal data and in-depth analysis based on content analysis and statistical evaluation. Authors: Ansgar Zerfass and Kristin Koehler, University of Leipzig, Germany.
NIRI Capital Social Media and Investor Relations - January 6, 2010Darrell Heaps
Slides from a presentation I gave to the NIRI Capital Area Chapter on Jan 6, 2010. Some of the slides are repetitive from previous presentations. Includes an overview of the recent trends of how social media is being used for investor relations.
NYSE/Q4 Webinar: Social Media & IR Website Best PracticesQ4 Web Systems
In collaboration with the NYSE, on June 26, 2012, Darrell Heaps, CEO of Q4 Web Systems, discussed best practice examples of companies who use their IR website and social media to maximize their online communications efforts.
Listen in and you'll:
1. Discover the most recent trends in online communications.
2. Learn how an integrated approach using the IR website and social media can help expand your reach and attract and influence investors.
3. Find out what tools, channels and tactics should be employed to maximize an integrated approach to online communications.
In this webinar, Carmine Porco, GM and VP of Client Deliverables at Prescient, walks through several social media tools, explaining their pros and cons, their benefits to an organization, and the ideal intranet environment to support them.
View the webinar video here: http://bit.ly/cawgmh
As president of AAF for the National Student Advertising Competition (NSAC), we developed a thorough campaign for AOL (AIM) as an elite social media tool for the 18-24 age group covering research, analysis, media planning & strategy, creative execution, commercials, print ads, non traditional advertising, website strategy, and viral marketing. At the end of our term we pitched our campaign in Portland, Oregon among the Northwest Universities and as president, lead BYU - Idaho's advertising team of 25 members to place 2nd overall. Visit http://aaf.org/default.asp?id=122 to learn more about this HUGE event.
Recruitment activities and employer branding are transforming since the rise of the new media on the World Wide Web (including Web 2.0, social software, ICT 3.0 and other concepts). These new social media create various opportunities for recruiters and their communications, but there are also big pitfalls which can instantaneously harm the organization’s reputation and impression that was build up so carefully in previous decennia. Online conversations can become the most important information source for the current digital natives. Consequently, an employer brand could be primarily defined by people external to the organization.
As such, before using social media for recruitment objectives, the whole concept of social media has to be understood and the different possible marketing and communication applications for organizations’ recruitment activities have to be evaluated. The goal of this report is to establish a first and general – not comprehensive - overview of social media and implementations for recruitment purposes, aimed at young graduates. In essence, a social media presence of the employer brand on a meta level.
Get a detailed comparison and analysis of available solutions
Social Messaging is the exchange of information in real time by staff and executives. It makes status updates by staff available to the whole network (except if it has been limited to partial networks), which helps colleagues learn from each other, share what they are working on, important events, or relevant information.
Download this summary as a prelude to purchasing the full report at www.aiim.org/reports
CIC and MEC reveal“2013 Consumption Trends in China”, some of these trends are comprehensive in scope, affecting and altering many aspects of consumption.
In Finland, Enterprise 2.0 is currently at the early (but accelerating) adoption stage, where competitive advantages will come to those who embrace the new tools and business models. In today's economic climate, that can mean the difference between survival and failure for many companies.
Enterprises and organizations in Finland have found Web 2.0 tools to be effective in reducing costs, however, Finnish organizations and businesses are still early adopters when it comes to the use of Enterprise 2.0 and web 2.0 for revenue growth and innovation.
Empirical study investigating how corporations in the United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Japan use social media for financial communications, both on their own websites and on external platforms including mobile channels. Global benchmark of 190 companies including the 150 largest firms listed on DJIA (Dow Jones Industrial Average, USA), FTSE (Financial Times London Stock Exchange Index, UK), CAC (Cotation Assistée en Continu quarante, France), DAX (Deutscher Aktien-Index, Germany), NIKKEI (Nihon Keizai Shimbun Index, Japan), as well as the top 10 companies in regard to market cap, and the top 10 companies in regard to performance of the US mid- and small-cap indices Russell Midcap and Russell 2000. As the third annual study in a row, this research provides longitudinal data and in-depth analysis based on content analysis and statistical evaluation. Authors: Ansgar Zerfass and Kristin Koehler, University of Leipzig, Germany
In this webinar, Carmine Porco, GM and VP of Client Deliverables at Prescient, walks through several social media tools, explaining their pros and cons, their benefits to an organization, and the ideal intranet environment to support them.
View the webinar video here: http://bit.ly/cawgmh
As president of AAF for the National Student Advertising Competition (NSAC), we developed a thorough campaign for AOL (AIM) as an elite social media tool for the 18-24 age group covering research, analysis, media planning & strategy, creative execution, commercials, print ads, non traditional advertising, website strategy, and viral marketing. At the end of our term we pitched our campaign in Portland, Oregon among the Northwest Universities and as president, lead BYU - Idaho's advertising team of 25 members to place 2nd overall. Visit http://aaf.org/default.asp?id=122 to learn more about this HUGE event.
Recruitment activities and employer branding are transforming since the rise of the new media on the World Wide Web (including Web 2.0, social software, ICT 3.0 and other concepts). These new social media create various opportunities for recruiters and their communications, but there are also big pitfalls which can instantaneously harm the organization’s reputation and impression that was build up so carefully in previous decennia. Online conversations can become the most important information source for the current digital natives. Consequently, an employer brand could be primarily defined by people external to the organization.
As such, before using social media for recruitment objectives, the whole concept of social media has to be understood and the different possible marketing and communication applications for organizations’ recruitment activities have to be evaluated. The goal of this report is to establish a first and general – not comprehensive - overview of social media and implementations for recruitment purposes, aimed at young graduates. In essence, a social media presence of the employer brand on a meta level.
Get a detailed comparison and analysis of available solutions
Social Messaging is the exchange of information in real time by staff and executives. It makes status updates by staff available to the whole network (except if it has been limited to partial networks), which helps colleagues learn from each other, share what they are working on, important events, or relevant information.
Download this summary as a prelude to purchasing the full report at www.aiim.org/reports
CIC and MEC reveal“2013 Consumption Trends in China”, some of these trends are comprehensive in scope, affecting and altering many aspects of consumption.
In Finland, Enterprise 2.0 is currently at the early (but accelerating) adoption stage, where competitive advantages will come to those who embrace the new tools and business models. In today's economic climate, that can mean the difference between survival and failure for many companies.
Enterprises and organizations in Finland have found Web 2.0 tools to be effective in reducing costs, however, Finnish organizations and businesses are still early adopters when it comes to the use of Enterprise 2.0 and web 2.0 for revenue growth and innovation.
Empirical study investigating how corporations in the United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Japan use social media for financial communications, both on their own websites and on external platforms including mobile channels. Global benchmark of 190 companies including the 150 largest firms listed on DJIA (Dow Jones Industrial Average, USA), FTSE (Financial Times London Stock Exchange Index, UK), CAC (Cotation Assistée en Continu quarante, France), DAX (Deutscher Aktien-Index, Germany), NIKKEI (Nihon Keizai Shimbun Index, Japan), as well as the top 10 companies in regard to market cap, and the top 10 companies in regard to performance of the US mid- and small-cap indices Russell Midcap and Russell 2000. As the third annual study in a row, this research provides longitudinal data and in-depth analysis based on content analysis and statistical evaluation. Authors: Ansgar Zerfass and Kristin Koehler, University of Leipzig, Germany
English rules
- Finance
- Science and technology
- Universities
- Advertising
- Computing
- Publishing industry
- Entertainment
- International organisations
- International transportation
- Interpreting and translation
Structured Investing In An Unstructured WorldRobert Davis
Structured Investing is based on 80+ years of financial market data, Nobel Prize-winning economic research, and in-depth studies of investor psychology and behavior.
EY French Venture Capital Barometer - Annual results 2015EY
The EY French Venture Capital Barometer identifies financing operations in equity of companies in their creation phase or during their first years after creation, from 1st of January to 31st of December 2015, published before the 14th of January 2016.
OTCQX: The Clear Advantage -- Research StudySaskianna
OTC Markets Group commissioned strategic advisory firm Oxford Metrica to conduct an independent study examining the impact of trading on OTCQX, the top U.S. over-the-counter (“OTC”) market, in terms of share liquidity, bid-ask spreads, broker-dealer coverage, and investor perception.
The study evaluated all securities that traded on OTCQX for at least three months during the three years prior to October 31, 2015, a total of 397 primary securities with $1 trillion in combined market capitalization. Liquidity was analyzed for the six months prior to joining OTCQX compared with the subsequent six months.
SaaS/subscription businesses are much more complex than traditional businesses, and SaaS performance cannot be measured in the same way as traditional businesses are measured. Based on a talk given at the SaaStr Annual Conference in San Francisco, this slide deck offers a comprehensive and detailed look at the key metrics that are needed to understand and optimize a SaaS business, and how these can be used to drive SaaS success. This presentation includes information on:
- An intro to SaaS metrics
- Unit economics
- LTV and churn: An in-depth look
- Variable pricing axes
- Months to recover CAC
- The primary unit of growth: Sales
- Understanding public SaaS companies
Video Streaming Outside The Firewall Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts...ReportLinker.com
WinterGreen Research announces the following study: Video Streaming Outside the Firewall Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2012-2018.Video content delivery on the internet is all about content and infrastructure. Infrastructure is needed to manage end point devices. Content is almost an afterthought once the infrastructure is in place. The vision of video content delivery is to change fundamentally the way media is accessed and consumed. User generated content represents a move away from entirely professional content to some content captured on the fly. As better video tools become more widely available, the quality of the user generated content and the professional video begins to converge. There has often been little or no charge for uploading user-generated content. As a result, data centers are replete with exabytes of user-generated content that, in addition to creating a corporate asset, may also contain data that can be regarded as a liability.
This presentation on Open Source and Cloud Technologies was given by Vizuri SVP Joe Dickman at the 2012 Destination Marketing Technology Forum in Raleigh, NC. For more information please visit our website at www.vizuri.com or email solutions@vizuri.com.
Lessons learned on Corporate Social Networks [intra.NET Reloaded 2012]Zyncro
Zyncro participated intra.NET Reloaded, Berlin 2012 as it is in one of the leading international events on the new wave of private work environments for enterprises. Our presentation
L'acquisition de BlueArc en septembre dernier a concrétisé la stratégie d'Hitachi Data Systems de transformation des Data Centers traditionnels en Centres d’Information, où les clients peuvent stocker leurs données, contenus et informations, et y accéder en toute transparence.
Notre vision est celle de l’information :
- Accessible et interrogeable partout et à tout moment
- Indépendante de l’infrastructure et de l’application
- Administrable de façon durable, économique et sécurisée.
Retour avec Randy DeMont, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Global Sales, Services and Support sur la formidable croissance d'Hitachi Data Systems.
This Intelligence Report is based on the survey of the 603 Swiss companies
that either outsource their Software Development (SD) / Information Technology (IT) function(s) to an external service provider onshore (within Switzerland), nearshore and/or offshore, or develop their software/IT solutions in-house.
E20 use cases and trends L Bryant HeadshiftKasia Szkuta
Presentation given at the "Enterprise 2.0 in Europe" workshop where the results of the interim report of the “Enterprise 2.0 study were presented and discussed with experts
Brussels, 14th of September 2010
Case Study: Practical tools and strategies for tackling legacy practices and ...Alejandro S.
In this talk you will learn how strategic tools like Wardley Maps, the C4 model and DDD’s strategic design helped a struggling CTO to fight against a crumbling monolith and the organizational practices that allowed its creation.
Among other things we will cover:
* How to plan, communicate and challenge strategies.
* Why strategy and thinking strategically is important for software developers.
* High-level overview of Simon Brown’s C4 Model
* High-level overview of DDD’s strategic design
* DDD Context Mapping
* High-level overview Wardley Maps.
* Wardley Maps: Landscape.
* FUN random facts about software development in startups :)
EQS Roadshow 2012 / Präsentation Anlegerstudie der Universität Leipzig: Ergebnisse und Analysen für die professionelle Kommunikation mit Privatanlegern
Anlegerstudie 2012 - Informationsanforderungen von Privatanlegern und Perspek...Kristin Koehler
Ergebnisbericht einer Befragung von Privatanlegern in Deutschland: Wie und mit welchen Informationen will diese wichtige Zielgruppe der Finanzkommunikation versorgt werden, welche Rolle spielen Internet und Social Media, wo liegen heute noch Defizite? Eine Studie des Instituts für Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft der Universität Leipzig gemeinsam mit der Deutschen Schutzvereinigung für Wertpapierbesitz e.V. (DSW), der Schutzgemeinschaft der Kapitalanleger e.V. (SdK) und der Deutsche EuroShop AG untersucht. Befragt wurden mehr als 500 Privatanleger in Deutschland mit monetärem Engagement in Aktien, Investmentfonds und/oder Unternehmensanleihen. 69 Seiten, PDF, Mai 2012.
Präsentation zum Thema "Investor Relations 2.0 - Status quo und Best Practices im internationalen Vergleich" / Roadshow EquityStory AG, Börse Stuttgart, 04.10.2011
IR 2.0 International Benchmark Study / University of Leipzig
1. Investor relations 2.0 – An international benchmark study
Kristin Koehler, M.A.
University of Leipzig | Institute of Communication and Media Studies | August 2011
1 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
2. Content
Outline of the study
Research design
Empirical insights
Best practices
Summary of findings
2 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
3. Outline of the study
_ Online content analysis of top 30 listed businesses in the United States
(Dow Jones Industrial Average), Germany (DAX), UK (FTSE), France (CAC)
and Japan (Nikkei)
_ In addition, comparison of the IR 2.0 engagement of German companies
listed in DAX, MDAX, TecDAX and SDAX
_ Longitudinal design for German and U.S. indices: first IR 2.0 study
conducted in 2009 (see DIRK research edition, vol. 17, Köhler, K. (2010):
Investor relations and social media)
_ Organized by the University of Leipzig, Kristin Koehler, M.A.
_ Thanks to Melanie Gerasch and Isabel Reinhardt for their support
3 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
4. Outline of the study
Aims and focus
_ Monitoring the status quo in the field of investor relations 2.0 in an
international context
_ Identifying trends and developments for German and U.S. businesses
_ Identifying best practices
_ Comparing use of social media for IR purposes in different countries and
cultural settings
4 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
5. Research design
_ Online content analysis of 280 listed companies in GER, USA, GB, FRA,
JPN: Investor relations websites and presence with IR topics on Facebook,
Twitter, YouTube and SlideShare
_ Analysis included platforms and tools, predominant functions, topics, ratio
between obligatory information and published news via social media,
possibility for feedback and dialogue with stakeholders
_ Ranking in regard to investor relations 2.0 engagement index
_ Period of analysis: December 2010 – May 2011
_ Independent variables: industrial sector, sales market, index membership
_ Methods of empirical research, descriptive and analytical analysis (using
SPSS for statistical analysis)
See Koehler (2011) for further readings.
5 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
8. Investor relations 2.0 engagement index
Engagement index
IR 2.0 engagement index (IIR2.0) comprises internal and external IR 2.0 engagement. Internal = Social media on the IR website; External =
external social networks or platforms, here: Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, or SlideShare. Index values for the overall score ranged from 0 to
1,280 with low engagement on a level of 0 !" IIR2.0 !#$$%"&'()*&"'+,-,'&'+."/+"-"0'1'0"/2"#$$"!"IIR2.0 !3$$"-+("4),4"'+,-,'&'+."/+"-"0'1'0"
of IIR2.053$$6
8 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
9. U.S. and German companies outperform
RANKING IR2.0ENGAGEMENT
Companies
Ranking IR 2.0 / internal (in Ranking IR 2.0 / external (in Ranking IR 2.0 / overall (in
comparison to 2009) comparison to 2009) comparison to 2009)
1 Cisco Systems Inc. (4) DJIA Alcoa Inc. (1) DJIA Cisco Systems Inc. (5) DJIA
2 General Electric Co. (1) DJIA BASF SE (30) DAX General Electric Co. (1) DJIA
3 SAP AG (2) DAX Deutsche Bank AG (10) DAX SAP AG (2) DAX
4 HewlettPackard Co. (3) DJIA BMW AG (13) DAX HewlettPackard Co. (7) DJIA
5 AT&T Inc. (66) DJIA Chevron Corp. (15) DJIA AT&T Inc. (22) DJIA
6 Intel Corp. (6) DJIA SAP AG (4) DAX Intel Corp. (10) DJIA
7 Alcoa Inc. (25) DJIA AlcatelLucent SA () CAC Alcoa Inc. (3) DJIA
8 BAYER AG (12) DAX Cisco Systems Inc. (6) DJIA BAYER AG (23) DAX
9 Daimler AG (10) DAX Lafarge SA () CAC Daimler AG (12) DAX
10 Boeing Co. (43) DJIA Daimler AG (9) DAX BASF SE (27) DAX
N = 150. Comparison could only be conducted for German DAX listed and U.S. DJIA listed companies. Changes in: DAX: sorted out: Salzgitter AG, new: HeidelbergCement
AG; DJIA: no changes. For the 2009 research results cf. Köhler, 2010 (N = 190; indices analysed: DAX, DJIA, MDAX, SDAX, TecDAX).Score IR 2.0 / internal = ((no. of dialogical
tools *3) + (no. of tools * 2) + (no. of social media publications on IR website * functions (1‐4) * degree of implementation (0‐3)) + (no. of social media publications with
feedback or comment function on IR website * 3) + (no. of social media publications on IR website / no. of IR releases traditionally published)). Score IR 2.0 / external =
((no. IR channels * 3) + (no. of channels with IR topics * 2) + (no. of social media publications on external platforms) + (no. of social media publications on external
platforms / no. of IR releases traditionally published)). Score IR 2.0 / overall = ((Score IR 2.0 / internal) + (Score IR 2.0 / external)).
9 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
11. 95 per cent use social media on their IR website;
webcast and RSS feed on top position
Overview applications on IR website
RSS feed
30
Other 25 Podcast
20
15
IR app 10 Webcast
5
0
Share button Video cast
Wiki Weblog
Chat
DJIA DAX FTSE CAC NIKKEI
N = 142. Number of companies using the mentionend applications on IR website. Other: e.g. social media survey, live stream without filing,
instant messaging reminder, skype, virtual shareholder magazines. Share button includes Facebook “like” button and tweet button.
11 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
12. Companies increasingly link to external platforms from
their IR website
No. of companies with links to external platforms
0
1
Link to other 2
2
3
0
0 3
Link to SlideShare
1 0
Link to FlickR 1 2
2
3 3
4
0 Link to YouTube
0 4
Link to SlideShare 0 10
3
2 7
7
0 Link to Twitter
4 6
Link to YouTube 4 17
4
10 2
4
Link to Facebook
0 4
5 12
Link to Twitter 7
7
17 0 5 10 15 20
0
5 DAX 2009 DAX 2011 DJIA 2009 DJIA 2011
Link to Facebook 2
4
12
0 5 10 15 20
NIKKEI CAC FTSE DAX DJIA
N = 142 (no. of companies with social media on IR website). Number of companies with links to external social media platforms from their IR
website. Other: e.g. LinkedIn, Scibd, Dailymotion, FourSquare.
12 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
13. Majority is still sceptical and does not experiment with
more than 5 different tools
Overview no. of different tools on IR website
DJIA
30
25
20
15
NIKKEI 10 DAX
5
0
CAC FTSE
15 different tools 610 different tools More than 10 different tools
N = 142 (no. of companies with social media on IR website). Number of companies using different tools on IR website.
13 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
14. American blue chips are most engaged; Japanese
companies lack behind
Comparison no. of publications via social media
300
249
250
213
199
200
157
150 140
133
126
108 105
95
100
67
54
50 34 36
29 33
22 23 21 20 25
17 17 18 15
76 10 10 7
3 0 00000 01000 01100 1 2 4
0
RSS feed Podcast Webcast Video cast Weblog Chat Wiki Share IR app Other
button
DJIA DAX FTSE CAC NIKKEI
N = 142 (no. of companies with social media on IR website). Number of publications via social media (e.g. videos, audio recordings, audio
visual presentations) on IR website.
14 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
15. DJIA: Increased social media usage in comparison to
2009; especially blogs gain importance
DJIA 2009 to 2011 / Social media on IR website
300
281
249
250
221
213
199
200
150 140
126
100 85
50
2529 2529 2826
1814
1317 10 9
14
9
4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
RSS feed Podcast Webcast Video cast Weblog Chat Wiki Share button IR app
DJIA (no. of companies 2009) DJIA (no. of companies 2011)
DJIA (no. of publications 2009) DJIA (no. of publications 2011)
N = 30 (no. of DJIA listed companies using different tools on IR website).
15 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
16. DAX: Podcast lost ground; no significant improvements
in IR 2.0 practice
DAX 2009 to 2011 / Social media on IR website
180
157
160
138
140 133
123
120
108 109
100
80
60
40 33
26 27
21 22 21 22
20 15 13 13 12 15 15
6 6
2 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
0
RSS feed Podcast Webcast Video cast Weblog Chat Wiki Share button IR app
DAX (no. of companies 2009) DAX (no. of companies 2011)
DAX (no. of publications 2009) DAX (no. of publications 2011)
N = 29 (no. of DAX listed companies using different tools on IR website).
16 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
17. On a low level, dialogical approaches are on the rise
Overview no. of dialogical tools on IR DJIA / DAX 2009 to 2011
website
0 3
1 8
Tools with feedback or Tools with feedback or
2
comment function comment function
8 3
14 14
2 4
28 47
Publications with Publications with
feedback or comment 28 feedback or comment
function function
47 61
240 240
0 100 200 300 0 200 400
NIKKEI CAC FTSE DAX DJIA DAX 2009 DAX 2011 DJIA 2009 DJIA 2011
N = 142 (no. of companies with social media on IR website). Number of tools and publications via social media on IR website.
17 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
18. Most blue chips communicate on at least one of the social
networks with IR participation
Overview external engagement DJIA / DAX 2009 to 2011
Company’s presence 26
15
Company’s presence on at least 1 of 24 on at least 1 of the 29
22 external platform (all
the external platform (all topics) 28 28
29 topics) 28
0 Specific IR 0
Specific IR channel/account on at 0 channel/account on at 1
0 least 1 of the external
least 1 of the external platforms 2 2
1 platforms 2
6 IR engagement on at 20
IR engagement on at least 1 of the 14 22
18 least 1 of the external
external platforms 17 16
22 platforms 17
2 2
8 IR engagement on 2 11
IR engagement on 2 platforms 13
11 platforms 6
11 11
1 3
3 IR engagement on 3 7
IR engagement on 3 platforms 6
7 platforms 1
7 7
0 0
0 IR engagement on all 4 3
IR engagement on all 4 platforms 0
2 platforms 0
3 2
0 10 20 30 40 0 20 40
NIKKEI CAC FTSE DAX DJIA DJIA 2009 DJIA 2011 DAX 2009 DAX 2011
N = 118. Number of companies within the sample on external platforms (here: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, or SlideShare); all topics.
18 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
19. Twitter and YouTube as top channels for the publication
of IR relevant topics regarding no. of companies
Overview IR presence in social networks
20
18
18
16
16
14 14
14 13 13
12 11
10
8
8 7 7
6 5
4 4 4 4
4 3 3
2
2 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
DJIA DAX FTSE CAC NIKKEI
IR presence on SlideShare IR SlideShare channel
IR presence on YouTube IR YouTube channel
IR presence on Twitter IR Twitter channel
IR presence on Facebook IR Facebook channel
N = 77. Number of companies on external platforms with IR topics (here: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, or SlideShare).
19 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
20. However, specific IR channels remain at a low level
Comparison DJIA & DAX / IR presence in social networks
20
18
18
16
14 14
14
12
12 11
10 9 9
8 7 7
6 5
4 4
4 3
2 2 2
2 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
IR presence on IR SlideShare IR presence on IR YouTube IR presence on IR Twitter IR presence on IR Facebook
SlideShare channel YouTube channel Twitter channel Facebook channel
DJIA 2011 DJIA 2009 DAX 2011 DAX 2009
N = 39. Number of DJIA and DAX companies on external platforms with IR topics (here: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, or SlideShare).
20 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
21. Most intense use of Twitter and Facebook regarding no.
of publications
Overview no. of publications on external platforms
0 14
20 Posts and comments 128
Posts and comments on Facebook 21
128 on Facebook
55
121
121
69
148 440
Tweets and retweets on Twitter 195
326 Tweets and retweets 326
375 on Twitter
447
1 375
17
Videos on YouTube 24
70 38
84 70
Videos on YouTube
0 35
0
Presentations on SlideShare 2 84
7
18
2
70 Presentations on 7
185 SlideShare
Publications on external platforms 242 0
531 18
598
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 500
NIKKEI CAC FTSE DAX DJIA DAX 2009 DAX 2011 DJIA 2009 DJIA 2011
N = 77 (No. of companies on external platforms with IR topics). Number of publications on external platforms (here: Facebook, Twitter,
YouTube, or SlideShare).
21 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
22. Social media are used for information and interpretion;
networking remains marginally considered
Basic functions of social media (no. of companies)
2
9
28
111
Basic functions of social media on the IR website: networking
4
17
107
22
Basic functions of social media on the IR website: interpretation
1
11
45
93
Basic functions of social media on the IR website: structuring
7
33
95
15
Basic functions of social media on the IR website: information
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
fully applicable (100 per cent) largely applicable (5075 per cent) partly applicable (2550 per cent) not applicable (0 per cent)
Basic functions of social software, see Zerfaß & Sandhu, 2008: information (e.g., RSS feeds), structuring (e.g., social bookmarks, wikis),
interpretation (e.g., podcasts, video casts, and blogs) and networking (e.g., social communities). Category in content analysis: Degree to which
each function is fulfilled: 3 = fully applicable (to 100 per cent appropriate), 2 = largely applicable (to 5075 per cent appropriate), 1 = partly
applicable (to 2550 per cent appropriate), 0 = not applicable (to 0 per cent appropriate). N = 142 (category analyzed for companies using
social media on the IR website).
22 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
23. Differences between indices: FTSE and CAC use social
media for interpretation, Nikkei only for information,
DJIA and DAX are most balanced on a low level
Countryspecific characteristics of investor relations 2.0
Social media function N Average SD F p
Information DAX 30 1.30 0,651 3.806 0.006
DJIA 30 1.47 0.681
FTSE 30 1.10 0.607
CAC 30 0.87 0.507
NIKKEI 30 1.33 0.802
Structuring DAX 30 0.67 0.661 3.266 0.013
DJIA 30 0.63 0.718
FTSE 30 0.47 0.776
CAC 30 0.43 0.568
NIKKEI 30 0.13 0.434
Interpretation DAX 30 1.07 0.450 10.758 < 0.001
DJIA 30 1.33 0.711
FTSE 30 1.23 0.504
CAC 30 0.97 0.414
NIKKEI 30 0.50 0.572
Networking DAX 30 0.50 0.861 16.616 < 0.001
DJIA 30 1.00 0.743
FTSE 30 0.10 0.305
CAC 30 0.10 0.305
NIKKEI 30 0.03 0.183
Basic functions of social software, see Zerfaß & Sandhu, 2008: information (e.g., RSS feeds), structuring (e.g., social bookmarks, wikis), interpretation
(e.g., podcasts, video casts, and blogs) and networking (e.g., social communities). Category in content analysis: Degree to which each function is fulfilled:
3 = fully applicable (to 100 per cent appropriate), 2 = largely applicable (to 5075 per cent appropriate), 1 = partly applicable (to 2550 per cent
appropriate), 0 = not applicable (to 0 per cent appropriate). N = 150 (category analysed for companies using social media on the IR website). Average =
mean score; SD = standard deviation; F = Fratio for oneway ANOVA Ftest statistic. Results significant for p < 0.05. Rounded figures. Significant
differences between groups (here: indices) according to social media functions found. Post hoc tests revealed further insights, see Koehler (2011).
23 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
25. Software, technology and telecommunications
outperform, but no significant correlation between
industrial sector and IR engagement could be found
Mean values industrial sector
Oneway ANOVA tests found no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05).
25 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
26. Surprisingly, B2B more engaged in social media when it
comes to financial communications
Mean values sales market
Oneway ANOVA tests found no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05).
26 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
27. Within German companies, DAX outperforms but smaller
indices significantly gain ground
Social media usage on IR website
45
41
40
35
35
30 29 29
25
25
20
20
16
15
15
10
5
0
DAX MDAX TecDAX SDAX
Social media on IR website 2011 Social media on IR website 2009
N = 115 (2011) / 95 (2009). Number of companies with internal IR 2.0 engagement, German indices only.
27 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
28. Findings for German indices correspond with data for
international usage: screencasts on top
Overview applications on IR Overview applications on IR
website 2011 website 2009
RSS feed RSS feed
30 30
Feedback tools Podcast Feedback tools Podcast
25 25
20 20
Other Webcast Other 15 Webcast
15
10 10
5
5
IR app 0 Video cast
IR app 0 Video cast
External link Weblog
External link Weblog
Share button Chat
Share button Chat
Wiki
Wiki
DAX MDAX TecDAX SDAX DAX MDAX TecDAX SDAX
N = 115 (2011) ) / 95 (2009). Number of companies with internal IR 2.0 engagement, German indices only. Other: e.g. social media survey,
live stream without filing, instant messaging reminder, skype, virtual shareholder magazines. External link: Link to external social media
platforms (e.g. FourSquare, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter).
28 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
29. German IROs gradually pay attention to external
platforms, also among small and mid caps
Overview IR presence in social networks
16
14 14
14
12
12
11
10
9
8
8
7 7 7
6
4 4 4 4
4
3 3 3 3 3
2 22 2 2 2 2 2
2
1 1 1 1 1 11 1111 1 1 1 11
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0
0
DAX 2011 DAX 2009 MDAX 2011 MDAX 2009 TecDAX 2011 TecDAX 2009 SDAX 2011 SDAX 2009
IR presence on SlideShare IR SlideShare channel IR presence on YouTube IR YouTube channel
IR presence on Twitter IR Twitter channel IR presence on Facebook IR Facebook channel
N = 51 (2011) / 27 (2009). Number of companies with IR 2.0 engagement on external platforms (here: YouTube, Twitter, Facebook,
SlideShare); German indices only.
29 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
30. However, specific IR channels are not yet perceived
valuable for financial communications at large;
improvements within small and mid caps
Overview no. of publications on external platforms
18 17
16
16 15
14
12 11
10
10 9
8 7 7
6
6
4 4 4 4
4 3
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
DAX 2011 DAX 2009 MDAX 2011 MDAX 2009 TecDAX 2011 TecDAX 2009 SDAX 2011 SDAX 2009
IR engagement on all 4 platforms
IR engagement on at least 3 platforms
IR engagement on at least 2 platforms
IR engagement on at least 1 of the external platforms
Specific IR channel/account on at least 1 of the external platforms
N = 51 (2011) / 27 (2009). Number of companies with IR 2.0 engagement on external platforms (here: YouTube, Twitter, Facebook,
SlideShare); German indices only. Specific IR channels: YouTube: Gesco AG (SDAX); Twitter: Deutsche EuroShop AG, HHLAG (both MDAX),
Qiagen, QSC AG (both TecDAX), Balda AG (SDAX); Facebook: Deutsche EuroShop AG, HHLAG (both MDAX), C.A.T. oil AG (SDAX); SlideShare:
Balda AG (SDAX).
30 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
46. Even though highly sensitive, social media seem
applicable to accompany M&A transactions / AT&T (DJIA)
with videos, blog posts, webcasts
46 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
48. Deutsche Euroshop (MDAX) proves that broad social
media engagement does not necessarily demands high
personal ressources
48 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
49. Summary of findings
_ Social media gained importance within investor relations departments
_ Internationally, U.S. blue chips are on the forefront
_ However, German companies outperform in comparison to French,
Japanese or British ones
_ Social media networks and other external platforms are still
underrepresented in online IR
_ Most companies employ different social media tools on their IR website
and support their online financial communications in regard to interactive
features, multimedia, but not shareholder dialogue or networking
_ Best practices prove adaptability of social media within investor relations
_ Further research is dedicated to focus on users‘ demands: Are social media
really appropriate for investor relations purposes? Which would be the
right channels? Which would be the appropriate type of communication?
_ Countryspecific differences within the recent study are critical for further
analysis (cultural differences as well as characteristics of the occupational
field, online usage patterns, etc.)
49 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
50. References
_ Köhler, K. (2011). Investor relations 2.0 – Status quo of online financial
communications. Paper presented at EUPRERA annual conference, Leeds, UK,
September 2011.
_ Köhler, K. (2010). Investor Relations und Social Media. Benchmarkstudie zur Praxis
der Finanzkommunikation im Web 2.0 bei börsennotierten Unternehmen in
Deutschland [Investor relations and social media]. DIRK Forschungsreihe, Vol. 17.
Mu!nchen: Going Public Media AG.
_ Weber, C. (2009). OnlineFinanzkommunikation [Online financial communications]. In
K. R. Kirchhoff & M. Piwinger (Eds.) Praxishandbuch Investor Relations. Das
Standardwerk der Finanzkommunikation [Handbook investor relations], (2nd rev.
Ed.) (pp. 393414). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
_ Zerfaß, A. & Sandhu, S. (2008). Interaktive Kommunikation, Social Web und Open
Innovation. Herausforderungen und Wirkungen im Unternehmenskontext [Interactive
communication, social web and open innovation. Challenges and effects for
organizations]. In A. Zerfaß, M. Welker & J. Schmidt (Eds.) Kommunikation,
Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web. Band 2: Strategien und Anwendungen:
Perspektiven für Wirtschaft, Politik, Publizistik [Communication, participation and
effects of the social web. Volume 2: Perspectives for business, politics and the media]
(pp. 283310). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
50 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
51. Appendix: Index composition
_ Each index represents the top listed companies in the respective
country/at the respective stock exchange.
_ From each index, the top 30 constituent companies according to weight
within size indices were chosen to enable a comparative design: The
German DAX and the U.S. DJIA both consist of 30 values. The Japanese
Nikkei comprises 225, the French CAC 40 and the UK based FTSE 100 the
100 most highly capitalized listed companies. DJIA and NIKKEI are price
weighted stock market indeces; DAX, CAC and FTSE are marketvalue
weighted indeces.
_ Index composition according to January 6, 2011.
_ DJIA: 3M Co., Alcoa Inc., American Express Co., AT&T Inc., Bank of America Corp.,
Boeing Co., Caterpillar Inc., Chevron Corp., Cisco Systems Inc., CocaCola Co., E.I.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., Exxon Mobil Corp., General Electric Co., HewlettPackard
Co., Home Depot Inc., Intel Corp., International Business Machines Corp., Johnson &
Johnson, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Kraft Foods Inc., McDonald's Corp., Merck & Co.
Inc., Microsoft Corp., Pfizer Inc., Procter & Gamble Co., Travelers Cos. Inc., United
Technologies Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., WalMart Stores Inc., Walt Disney
Co.
51 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
52. Appendix: Index composition cont‘d
_ DAX: adidas AG, Allianz SE, BASF SE, Bayer AG, Beiersdorf AG, BMW AG,
Commerzbank AG, Daimler AG, Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Börse AG, Deutsche
Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Post AG, Deutsche Telekom AG, E.ON AG, Fresenius Medical
Care AG & Co. KGaA, Fresenius SE, HeidelbergCement AG, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA,
Infineon Technologies AG, K+S AG, Linde AG, MAN SE, Merck KGaA, Metro AG,
Münchener Rück AG, RWE AG, SAP AG, Siemens AG, ThyssenKrupp AG, Volkswagen
AG
_ FTSE: Anglo American plc, AstraZeneca plc, Aviva plc, BAE Systems plc, Barclays plc,
BG Group plc, BHP Billiton plc, BP plc, British American Tobacco plc, BT Group plc,
Centrica plc, Diageo plc, GlaxoSmithKline plc, HSBC Holdings plc, Imperial Tobacco
Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, National Grid plc, Prudential plc, Reckitt
Benckiser Group plc, Rio Tinto Group plc, RollsRoyce Holdings plc, Royal Dutch Shell
plc, SABMiller plc , Scottish and Southern Energy plc, Standard Chartered plc, Tesco
plc, Tullow Oil plc, Unilever plc, Vodafone Group plc, Xstrata plc
52 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
53. Appendix: Index composition cont‘d
_ CAC: Air Liquide SA, AlcatelLucent SA, Alstom SA, Arcelormittal SA, AXA SA, BNP
Paribas SA, Carrefour SA, Credit Agricole SA, Danone SA, EADS, Essilor Intl. SA,
France Telecom SA, GDF Suez SA, L'Oréal SA, Lafarge SA, LVMH SA, Michelin SCA,
Pernod Ricard SA, PPR SA, Renault SA, Saint Gobain SA, SanofiAventis SA,
Schneider Electric SA, Societe Generale SA, Total SA, UnibailRodamco SA, Vallourec
SA, Veolia Environ. SA, Vinci SA, Vivendi SA
_ Nikkei: Canon Inc., Denso Corp., East Japan Railway Co., Fanuc Corp., Hitachi Ltd.,
Honda Motor Co. Ltd., Inpex Corp., Japan Tobacco Inc., KDDI Corp., Komatsu Ltd.,
Kyocera Corp., Mitsubishi Corp., Mitsubishi Electric Corp., Mitsubishi Estate Co. Ltd.,
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., Mitsui & Co. Ltd., Mizuho Financial Group Inc.,
Nippon Steel Corp., Nissan Motor Co. Ltd., NTT Corp., Panasonic Corp., Seven & I
Holdings Co. Ltd., ShinEtsu Chemical Co. Ltd., Softbank Corp., Sony Corp.,
Sumitomo Corp., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo Marine Holdings Inc.,
Toshiba Corp., Toyota Motor Corp.
(Weighting of Nikkei 225 index's components according to market capitalisation)
53 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
54. Appendix: Index composition cont‘d
_ German indixes TecDAX, MDAX and SDAX are marketvalueweighted
indeces.
_ Index composition according to January 6, 2011.
_ All companies within each German index were part of analysis.
_ MDAX: Aareal Bank AG, Aurubis AG, Axel Springer AG, BayWa AG, Bilfinger Berger
SE, Brenntag AG, Celesio AG, Continental AG, Demag Cranes AG, Deutsche EuroShop
AG, Deutsche Wohnen AG, Douglas Holding AG, ElringKlinger AG, EADS, Fielmann
AG, Fraport AG, Fuchs Petrolub AG, GAGFAH S.A., GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft,
Gerresheimer AG, Gildemeister AG, Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG, Hannover
Rückversicherung AG, Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG, Hochtief AG, Hugo Boss AG,
IVG Immobilien AG, Kabel Deutschland Holding AG, Klöckner & Co. SE, Krones AG,
LANXESS AG, Leoni AG, MTU Aero Engines Holding AG, Praktiker Bau und
Heimwerkermärkte Holding AG, ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG, Puma AG, Rational AG,
Rheinmetall AG, RHÖNKLINIKUM AG, Salzgitter AG, SGL Carbon SE, Sky
Deutschland AG, STADA Arzneimittel AG, Südzucker AG, Symrise AG, Tognum AG,
TUI AG, Vossloh AG, Wacker Chemie AG, WINCOR NIXDORF Aktiengesellschaft
54 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
55. Appendix: Index composition cont‘d
_ TecDAX: ADVA Optical Networking, Aixtron AG, BB Biotech AG, Bechtle AG, Carl Zeiss
Meditec AG, centrotherm photovoltaics AG, Conergy AG, Dialog Semiconductor plc,
Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA, Drillisch AG, EVOTEC AG, Freenet AG, Jenoptik AG,
Kontron AG, Manz Automation AG, MorphoSys AG, Nordex AG, Pfeiffer Vacuum
Technology AG, Phoenix Solar AG, QCells SE, Qiagen, QSC AG, Roth & Rau AG,
Singulus Technologies, SMA Solar Technology AG, Software AG, SolarWorld AG,
STRATEC Biomedical Systems AG, United Internet AG, Wirecard AG
_ SDAX: Air Berlin PLC, alstria office REIT AG, Amadeus Fire AG, Balda AG, Bauer AG,
Bertrandt AG, Biotest AG, C.A.T. oil AG, CENTROTEC Sustainable AG, CeWe Color
Holding AG, Colonia Real Estate AG, comdirect bank AG, Constantin Medien AG, CTS
Eventim AG, Delticom AG, Deutsche Beteiligungs AG, DEUTZ AG, DIC Asset AG, Dürr
AG, elexis AG, Gerry Weber International AG, Gesco AG, GfK SE, Grammer AG,
GRENKELEASING AG, H&R WASAG AG, Hawesko Holding AG, Highlight
Communications AG, Homag Group AG, Hornbach Holding AG, Indus Holding AG,
Jungheinrich AG, Koenig & Bauer AG, KUKA AG, KWS SAAT AG, Medion AG, MLP AG,
MVV Energie AG, PATRIZIA Immobilien AG, Pfleiderer AG, SAF Holland S.A., Sixt AG,
SKW StahlMetallurgie Holding AG, Ströer Outofhome Media AG, TAG Immobilien
AG, TAKKT AG, Tipp24 SE, TOM TAILOR Holding AG, VTG AG, Wacker Neuson SE
55 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
56. Copyright and reproduction of results
_ The material presented in this document represents empirical insights and
interpretation by the author. It is intellectual property subject to
international copyright. Publication date: August 2011.
_ You are welcome to quote from the content of this survey and reproduce
any graphics, subject to the condition that the source including the
internet address is clearly quoted and depicted on every chart.
_ Suggested citation for this document (APA style)
Koehler, K. (2011): Investor relations 2.0. An international benchmark
study (Chart Version). Leipzig: University of Leipzig (available at:
http://www.slideshare.net/communicationmanagement)
56 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de
57. Contact
Kristin Koehler, M.A.
University of Leipzig, Germany
Research Assistant
Institute of Communication and Media Studies
Department Communication Management and Public Relations
(Prof. Dr. Ansgar Zerfass)
kristin.koehler@unileipzig.de
www.communciationmanagement.de
57 / Kristin Koehler | University of Leipzig | www.communicationmanagement.de