This document provides an introduction to comparative politics. It discusses what comparative politics is, what it studies, and its main approaches. Comparative politics aims to describe, explain, and predict outcomes by comparing political systems, institutions, actors, and processes across countries. It examines similarities and differences at the national, sub-national, and supranational levels. The document also outlines the evolution of the field from its traditional focus on institutions to the behavioral revolution examining public attitudes, and more recent returns to institutional analysis.

1. Introduction to
Comparative Politics
CLASS LECTURE for
POLITICAL SCIENCE (HONOURS) /
PART – II
SILIGURI COLLEGE Prof. AMITAVA KANJILAL;
Head of the Department;
POLITICAL SCIENCE
SILIGURI COLLEGE
amitavakanjilal@ymail.com
9832031786 / 9126300912

2. What is Comparative Politics ?
What does Comparative Politics
do in practice?
1) DescriptionDescription
2) ExplanationExplanation
3) PredictionPrediction
““the intent of Comparative Politics is thatthe intent of Comparative Politics is that
of a rigorous scientific and empirical fieldof a rigorous scientific and empirical field
of study : description, explanation, andof study : description, explanation, and
prediction”prediction” (Daniele Caramani; 2008).(Daniele Caramani; 2008).

3. What is Comparative Politics ?
What are the
Levels of Comparison?
-National political systems
-Sub-national regional political systems
-Supra-national units
-Single elements or components of the political system

4. What is Comparative Politics ?
What is compared?
-Political systems
-Regimes
-Institutions
-Actors
-Processes
-Policies

5. What is Comparative Politics ?
Traditional Comparative Politics versus
“Behavioural Revolution”
What triggered this Revolution?
The emergence of new casesThe emergence of new cases ::
Breakdown of democracies and rise of newBreakdown of democracies and rise of new
types of regimestypes of regimes
Stable democracies which were not of theStable democracies which were not of the
Anglo-Saxon typeAnglo-Saxon type

6. What is Comparative Politics ?
Consequences of the Behavioural Revolution
for
Comparative Politics :
Increase in the variety of Political Systems
Study of Non-formal institutions
New methodology
New “Language”

7. Approaches in Comparative Politics
The five "I"s = the five main Approaches
in Comparative Politics
(1)Institutions(1)Institutions
(2)(2)InterestsInterests
(3)(3)IdeasIdeas
(4)(4)IndividualsIndividuals
(5)(5)International environmentInternational environment

8. Approaches in Comparative Politics
But weaknesses of five "I"s
 The lacking of a sixth “I”
Interaction
 Too static approach

9. Focus of Comparative Politics
What is the
focus of
Comparative Politics?Comparative Politics?

10. Focus of Comparative Politics
Studies in Comparative Politics may focus on a
small number of countries (two or more) or it
may attempt to incorporate the analysis of a
very large range of countries.
Countries, in fact, need not be the unit of analysis,
sub-national regional political units or supra-
national units may be the focus.SOVEREIGN NATIONS SUB-NATIONAL
UNITS
SUPRA-NATIONAL
UNITS

11. Origin and Evolution of
Comparative Politics
Plato and Aristotle, while usually considered as
political theorists, were engaged in the process
of comparing different political regimes :
Aristocracy
Oligarchy
Democracy
Tyranny

12. Origin and Evolution of
Comparative Politics
Modern comparative politics can be traced back
to ::
(among others)
 Machiavelli, The Prince, 1532.
 Montesquieu, On the Spirit of the Laws, 1748

13. Origin and Evolution of
Comparative Politics
 In the first half of the 20th
century,
Comparative Politics, emerging as a sub-
discipline of Political Science, focused on
the formal-legal institutions of the state.

14. Origin and Evolution of
Comparative Politics
 In the 1950s and 60s, attention turned
towards the study of the political behaviour
and political attitudes of the public.
 The “Behavioural Revolution” was facilitated
by developments in survey techniques and
emerging computerization. This greatly
increased the possibility fornumber-crunching
among social scientists.

15. Origin and Evolution of
Comparative Politics
 The Empirical Approach in Political Science still has its
proponents today, but by the late 1960s it was under attack
from a variety of directions and for a variety of reasons.

16. The Politics of
Political Science Methodology
York University, 1969:
“Fifty student radicals converged on a
meeting of the Canadian Political Science
Association…to denounce what they called
the methodology of political science.”
Protesters “walked into the Vanier College
dining hall carrying balloons, flowers and
signs denouncing [David] Easton’s systems
analysis theory.”
See: http://imprint.uwaterloo.ca/pdfarchive/1969-70_v10,n06_Chevron.pdf

17. A Return to Institutions
 By the 1980s, various scholars were
attempting to ‘bring the state back in’ to the
centre of their analysis.
 This form of institutionalism often portrays
state actors as having a degree of autonomy
and different state structures as influencing
political outcomes.