This document discusses boosting Kazakhstan's national intellectual property system for innovation. It provides an overview of Kazakhstan's socio-economic conditions and innovation potential, the organization of its intellectual property system, different intellectual property user groups in the country, and efforts to create conditions for intellectual property markets. The document recommends focusing policy on improving coordination of intellectual property policies, facilitating use of intellectual property by SMEs and traditional sectors, adapting policies targeted at universities to enhance private sector development, and taking a sectoral focus in intellectual property policies.
This document provides an overview of the OECD project on Innovation for Inclusive Growth and its 2015 report. The project aims to examine how innovation can promote inclusive development. It involved experts from various countries and organizations. The 2015 report focuses on inclusive innovations that improve welfare for disadvantaged groups. It discusses policy approaches to support such innovations and ensure they reach scale. The document outlines challenges like informality, access to expertise and finance, and regulatory issues. It proposes policy responses like cross-government coordination, public-private partnerships, and financial support to foster cooperation across actors and address challenges.
Boosting Malaysia's National Intellectual Property System for Innovationinnovationoecd
The document discusses a project to boost Malaysia's national intellectual property system for innovation. It provides an overview of the project background and implementation, Malaysia's socio-economic context, the organization of its IP system, current and potential IP users, and policy recommendations. The project conducted an analysis of Malaysia's IP system and identified 3 priority areas and 18 policy recommendations to strengthen how the national IP system contributes to innovation.
This document outlines a project by the OECD to assess the impacts of public research. The project aims to provide new evidence on how public research and related policies influence innovation. It will examine complementarities between university roles in education, research, and innovation. The project will also develop indicators to characterize differences in public research policies across countries and assess how specific scientific fields contribute to innovation in different industry sectors. Results will be shared through workshops and an online community of practice to facilitate exchanges on best practices in impact assessment of public research policies.
This document outlines a project assessing the impacts of public research. The project aims to provide new evidence on how public research and related policies impact innovation by characterizing different university systems, mapping public research policies, and assessing contributions of scientific disciplines to industry. The project activities include empirical analysis of US and European university data; qualitative mapping of public research policies across countries; and in-depth analysis of interactions between scientific fields and economic sectors. Workshops will be held to exchange information on findings and impact assessment methodologies.
Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016 - EC/OECD Launch eventinnovationoecd
The document summarizes key points from the OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. It discusses 8 megatrends that will impact science and innovation like aging societies and resource constraints. It also profiles 10 emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, biotechnologies, and the internet of things that will be important. The outlook notes challenges for governments in funding research due to competing priorities and calls for building international cooperation and more responsible innovation policies.
This document provides an overview of a project examining how innovation and policy can promote inclusive growth. The project involved countries developing policy conclusions on innovation for inclusive growth. Key milestones included symposiums in Paris and international conferences in New Delhi, Cape Town, and Paris. The final report and policy toolkit contains chapters on digital innovation and inclusive growth, innovation and territorial inclusiveness, and inclusiveness policies and programs in higher education.
This document summarizes discussions from a conference on developing science, technology and innovation indicators and policies. Key topics discussed include:
- The need for a systems approach and measuring innovation in all sectors to better inform policy.
- Collecting new data on topics like scientist mobility, refugee migration backgrounds, and knowledge flows to answer important questions.
- Involving stakeholders like scientists, engineers and citizens to understand impacts through participatory processes.
- The limits of indicators and risks of oversimplification or perverse effects from misuse of metrics like rankings.
- Making indicators more inclusive by capturing contributions from new performers and geographical or cognitive areas not traditionally included.
- Opportunities and challenges of
This document provides an overview of the OECD project on Innovation for Inclusive Growth and its 2015 report. The project aims to examine how innovation can promote inclusive development. It involved experts from various countries and organizations. The 2015 report focuses on inclusive innovations that improve welfare for disadvantaged groups. It discusses policy approaches to support such innovations and ensure they reach scale. The document outlines challenges like informality, access to expertise and finance, and regulatory issues. It proposes policy responses like cross-government coordination, public-private partnerships, and financial support to foster cooperation across actors and address challenges.
Boosting Malaysia's National Intellectual Property System for Innovationinnovationoecd
The document discusses a project to boost Malaysia's national intellectual property system for innovation. It provides an overview of the project background and implementation, Malaysia's socio-economic context, the organization of its IP system, current and potential IP users, and policy recommendations. The project conducted an analysis of Malaysia's IP system and identified 3 priority areas and 18 policy recommendations to strengthen how the national IP system contributes to innovation.
This document outlines a project by the OECD to assess the impacts of public research. The project aims to provide new evidence on how public research and related policies influence innovation. It will examine complementarities between university roles in education, research, and innovation. The project will also develop indicators to characterize differences in public research policies across countries and assess how specific scientific fields contribute to innovation in different industry sectors. Results will be shared through workshops and an online community of practice to facilitate exchanges on best practices in impact assessment of public research policies.
This document outlines a project assessing the impacts of public research. The project aims to provide new evidence on how public research and related policies impact innovation by characterizing different university systems, mapping public research policies, and assessing contributions of scientific disciplines to industry. The project activities include empirical analysis of US and European university data; qualitative mapping of public research policies across countries; and in-depth analysis of interactions between scientific fields and economic sectors. Workshops will be held to exchange information on findings and impact assessment methodologies.
Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016 - EC/OECD Launch eventinnovationoecd
The document summarizes key points from the OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. It discusses 8 megatrends that will impact science and innovation like aging societies and resource constraints. It also profiles 10 emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, biotechnologies, and the internet of things that will be important. The outlook notes challenges for governments in funding research due to competing priorities and calls for building international cooperation and more responsible innovation policies.
This document provides an overview of a project examining how innovation and policy can promote inclusive growth. The project involved countries developing policy conclusions on innovation for inclusive growth. Key milestones included symposiums in Paris and international conferences in New Delhi, Cape Town, and Paris. The final report and policy toolkit contains chapters on digital innovation and inclusive growth, innovation and territorial inclusiveness, and inclusiveness policies and programs in higher education.
This document summarizes discussions from a conference on developing science, technology and innovation indicators and policies. Key topics discussed include:
- The need for a systems approach and measuring innovation in all sectors to better inform policy.
- Collecting new data on topics like scientist mobility, refugee migration backgrounds, and knowledge flows to answer important questions.
- Involving stakeholders like scientists, engineers and citizens to understand impacts through participatory processes.
- The limits of indicators and risks of oversimplification or perverse effects from misuse of metrics like rankings.
- Making indicators more inclusive by capturing contributions from new performers and geographical or cognitive areas not traditionally included.
- Opportunities and challenges of
This document summarizes key points from the OECD's 2015 Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. It finds that Japan, along with other countries, faces productivity challenges and slowing population growth, making innovation imperative. However, Japanese living standards are below the OECD average. The document discusses the need to invest in broader knowledge beyond R&D, develop frontier technologies, and support long-term government research. International collaboration and mobility are important for strengthening research capabilities. While a few countries and companies dominate in research and innovation, greater efforts are needed to engage firms in global innovation networks.
Science, Innovation and the Economy: UK Challenges and OpportunitiesTera Allas
Presentation for Government Economic Service seminar in July 2014 on the role of science and innovation in economic growth and the UK's respective strengths and weaknesses
Insights on the performance of the UK's science and innovation systemTera Allas
Summary slide pack drawing out main conclusions of the BIS report on "Insights from international benchmarking of the UK's science and innovation system"
Bis science innovation week presentation tera 140314 full slide packTera Allas
The document provides an overview of the UK's science and innovation system compared to other countries. It finds that the UK has strengths in areas like the quality of scientific research and supportive business environment, but weaknesses in overall investment in R&D, human capital issues, and less innovative small and medium enterprises. The analysis uses frameworks to benchmark different elements of science and innovation systems, including money invested, talent/skills, knowledge assets, structures/incentives, and outputs, to evaluate the UK's performance in an international context.
Science, Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A comparative overview ...innovationoecd
Presentation by Andy Wyckoff, OECD Director for Science, Technology and Innovation, at 2nd World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12 May 2017.
The document summarizes key findings from the OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013. It discusses trends such as uneven economic recovery across OECD countries after the crisis, with unemployment remaining a major challenge. Young, dynamic firms have created more jobs than older firms even during crisis periods. International mobility of researchers has resulted in higher scientific impact. While business R&D remains important for innovation, policies also need to support entrepreneurship and investments beyond R&D. The Scoreboard aims to inform policymaking with indicators on these and other topics.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
This document analyzes ten pro-productivity institutions from different countries. It discusses some very preliminary thoughts based on interviews conducted so far. Key points include: there is no one-size-fits-all model and institutions need to adapt to national contexts. Political commitment is important to establish and maintain these institutions. Independence, transparency, and producing high quality work are important for legitimacy. The degree of institutionalization and ability to engage in evidence-based policymaking affects how effective these institutions can be. Sufficient funding is also important to attract talent and carry out various functions.
von Hippel - Toward more inclusive science and innovation indicatorsinnovationoecd
The document discusses the need to make science and innovation indicators more inclusive by accounting for household sector innovation. It makes two key suggestions: (1) change the Oslo Manual's definition of innovation to apply to household and other sectors, not just producers; and (2) measure household sector innovation through regular social surveys. The document argues that excluding free household innovations distorts understanding of interactions between sectors and underestimates total innovation. It provides examples and evidence of the scale and impacts of household innovation.
The SPINTAN project proposes to measure public sector intangibles in the EU and other countries. It aims to 1) clarify boundaries and measurement of public intangibles, 2) build a database on public intangibles for 22 EU and other nations, 3) analyze the impact of public intangibles on innovation, well-being and growth, 4) study spillover effects to the private sector, and 5) study the impact of austerity policies. The project involves multiple work packages to achieve these goals and will provide analysis to improve policymaking.
ICT, R&D and Non-R&D intangible capital: complementary relations and industry...SPINTAN
This document discusses a study analyzing the relationship between intangible capital (ICT, R&D, and non-R&D), their complementarity, and productivity growth across European countries and industries from 1995-2010. The main findings are: 1) Faster growing economies invested more in intangible capital like ICT and non-R&D, while slower economies relied more on tangible capital; 2) ICT, R&D, and non-R&D intangibles contributed significantly to productivity in most countries, especially in manufacturing; and 3) Non-R&D intangibles showed a strong correlation with ICT, suggesting they are important complementary policy factors for productivity.
The document provides information on the Nikkei Smart City Consortium in Japan, which aims to promote the realization of smart cities. It notes that the consortium includes specialists in the environment, energy, urban issues, and municipalities. Major Japanese companies involved in the consortium share and transmit information to help realize smart city projects. The consortium's composition shows that diverse public and private stakeholders are collaborating through platforms like this one to advance smart city initiatives in Japan.
The document discusses innovation and national innovation systems. It defines innovation as the implementation of new products, processes, marketing methods, or organizational methods. Innovation requires dissemination and use to have an impact. A national innovation system consists of institutions in the public and private sectors that initiate, import, modify and diffuse new technologies. It is a set of interconnected institutions that create, store and transfer knowledge to define new technologies. Policy needs to address knowledge supply and demand, interactions between institutions, and firms' ability to learn and acquire technology.
This document discusses policy experiences with collateralizing intangible assets. It provides rationales for policy intervention due to the proliferation of intangibles, market failures in debt financing for SMEs, and potential spillover effects. However, there are constraints to collateralizing intangibles, including asymmetric information and high transaction costs. The document examines policy case studies from China, Japan, and Korea that aim to address these issues through various support schemes. Key lessons highlighted include the need to work at scale, engage the private sector, standardize valuation methods, and broaden the view of intangibles beyond just patents.
Dr.Andrea Goldstein - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of InvestmentIra Tobing
This document summarizes an OECD workshop on developing industrial clusters through investment. It discusses the OECD Policy Framework for Investment and how it can be used to benchmark investment policies. The PFI covers 10 policy areas affecting investment and provides principles for an environment that supports all investors. The document also summarizes an OECD Investment Policy Review of Myanmar that identified recommendations to streamline approval processes, reduce restrictions, and promote responsible business conduct.
Peter J Buckley's presentation at the FDI Statistics Workshop (20 March 2014) during the session on whether or not FDI statisics are still a useful metric when measuring investment globalisation.
Find out more at http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/measuring-globalisation-fdi-statistics-workshop-2014.htm
On 23 October 2013, the OECD launched the "Science, Technology and Industry (STI) Scoreboard: Innovation for Growth 2013" at its headquarters in Paris. The 260 indicators in the STI Scoreboard 2013 show how OECD and partner economies are performing in a wide range of areas to help governments design more effective and efficient policies and monitor progress towards their desired goals.
Olga M. & Manuel G. | K.J. Joseph
LECTURE 6: THE INSTITUTIONAL ASPECT OF NSI by Dr. Olga Mikheeva, UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, UK & Dr. Manuel Gonzalo, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, Brazil. CHAIR: Professor Joseph K.J., Gulati Institute of Finance and Taxation (GIFT), India
This document summarizes the legal advantages of registering intellectual property rights (IPR) in Kazakhstan. Registration provides protection under state law and prevents unauthorized use by others. It also allows for recorded licenses, pledges, and assignments related to the registered IPR. Statistics on trademark, patent, and other IPR applications and registrations in Kazakhstan are also presented, along with examples of high-profile registered IPR. The document concludes with reasons to formally register IPR such as confirmation of trademark use and ability to legally enforce rights against violations.
CloudsNN 2013 Анисимов Константин. Облачный рынок в цифрах и фактах.Clouds NN
Компания - Parallels. Должность - директор по маркетингу и альянсам.
Тема доклада - Облачный рынок в цифрах и фактах.
Расскажу все, что из себя представляет облачный рынок в России, в мире и куда это все придет через 2-3 года.
This document summarizes key points from the OECD's 2015 Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. It finds that Japan, along with other countries, faces productivity challenges and slowing population growth, making innovation imperative. However, Japanese living standards are below the OECD average. The document discusses the need to invest in broader knowledge beyond R&D, develop frontier technologies, and support long-term government research. International collaboration and mobility are important for strengthening research capabilities. While a few countries and companies dominate in research and innovation, greater efforts are needed to engage firms in global innovation networks.
Science, Innovation and the Economy: UK Challenges and OpportunitiesTera Allas
Presentation for Government Economic Service seminar in July 2014 on the role of science and innovation in economic growth and the UK's respective strengths and weaknesses
Insights on the performance of the UK's science and innovation systemTera Allas
Summary slide pack drawing out main conclusions of the BIS report on "Insights from international benchmarking of the UK's science and innovation system"
Bis science innovation week presentation tera 140314 full slide packTera Allas
The document provides an overview of the UK's science and innovation system compared to other countries. It finds that the UK has strengths in areas like the quality of scientific research and supportive business environment, but weaknesses in overall investment in R&D, human capital issues, and less innovative small and medium enterprises. The analysis uses frameworks to benchmark different elements of science and innovation systems, including money invested, talent/skills, knowledge assets, structures/incentives, and outputs, to evaluate the UK's performance in an international context.
Science, Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A comparative overview ...innovationoecd
Presentation by Andy Wyckoff, OECD Director for Science, Technology and Innovation, at 2nd World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12 May 2017.
The document summarizes key findings from the OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013. It discusses trends such as uneven economic recovery across OECD countries after the crisis, with unemployment remaining a major challenge. Young, dynamic firms have created more jobs than older firms even during crisis periods. International mobility of researchers has resulted in higher scientific impact. While business R&D remains important for innovation, policies also need to support entrepreneurship and investments beyond R&D. The Scoreboard aims to inform policymaking with indicators on these and other topics.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
This document analyzes ten pro-productivity institutions from different countries. It discusses some very preliminary thoughts based on interviews conducted so far. Key points include: there is no one-size-fits-all model and institutions need to adapt to national contexts. Political commitment is important to establish and maintain these institutions. Independence, transparency, and producing high quality work are important for legitimacy. The degree of institutionalization and ability to engage in evidence-based policymaking affects how effective these institutions can be. Sufficient funding is also important to attract talent and carry out various functions.
von Hippel - Toward more inclusive science and innovation indicatorsinnovationoecd
The document discusses the need to make science and innovation indicators more inclusive by accounting for household sector innovation. It makes two key suggestions: (1) change the Oslo Manual's definition of innovation to apply to household and other sectors, not just producers; and (2) measure household sector innovation through regular social surveys. The document argues that excluding free household innovations distorts understanding of interactions between sectors and underestimates total innovation. It provides examples and evidence of the scale and impacts of household innovation.
The SPINTAN project proposes to measure public sector intangibles in the EU and other countries. It aims to 1) clarify boundaries and measurement of public intangibles, 2) build a database on public intangibles for 22 EU and other nations, 3) analyze the impact of public intangibles on innovation, well-being and growth, 4) study spillover effects to the private sector, and 5) study the impact of austerity policies. The project involves multiple work packages to achieve these goals and will provide analysis to improve policymaking.
ICT, R&D and Non-R&D intangible capital: complementary relations and industry...SPINTAN
This document discusses a study analyzing the relationship between intangible capital (ICT, R&D, and non-R&D), their complementarity, and productivity growth across European countries and industries from 1995-2010. The main findings are: 1) Faster growing economies invested more in intangible capital like ICT and non-R&D, while slower economies relied more on tangible capital; 2) ICT, R&D, and non-R&D intangibles contributed significantly to productivity in most countries, especially in manufacturing; and 3) Non-R&D intangibles showed a strong correlation with ICT, suggesting they are important complementary policy factors for productivity.
The document provides information on the Nikkei Smart City Consortium in Japan, which aims to promote the realization of smart cities. It notes that the consortium includes specialists in the environment, energy, urban issues, and municipalities. Major Japanese companies involved in the consortium share and transmit information to help realize smart city projects. The consortium's composition shows that diverse public and private stakeholders are collaborating through platforms like this one to advance smart city initiatives in Japan.
The document discusses innovation and national innovation systems. It defines innovation as the implementation of new products, processes, marketing methods, or organizational methods. Innovation requires dissemination and use to have an impact. A national innovation system consists of institutions in the public and private sectors that initiate, import, modify and diffuse new technologies. It is a set of interconnected institutions that create, store and transfer knowledge to define new technologies. Policy needs to address knowledge supply and demand, interactions between institutions, and firms' ability to learn and acquire technology.
This document discusses policy experiences with collateralizing intangible assets. It provides rationales for policy intervention due to the proliferation of intangibles, market failures in debt financing for SMEs, and potential spillover effects. However, there are constraints to collateralizing intangibles, including asymmetric information and high transaction costs. The document examines policy case studies from China, Japan, and Korea that aim to address these issues through various support schemes. Key lessons highlighted include the need to work at scale, engage the private sector, standardize valuation methods, and broaden the view of intangibles beyond just patents.
Dr.Andrea Goldstein - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of InvestmentIra Tobing
This document summarizes an OECD workshop on developing industrial clusters through investment. It discusses the OECD Policy Framework for Investment and how it can be used to benchmark investment policies. The PFI covers 10 policy areas affecting investment and provides principles for an environment that supports all investors. The document also summarizes an OECD Investment Policy Review of Myanmar that identified recommendations to streamline approval processes, reduce restrictions, and promote responsible business conduct.
Peter J Buckley's presentation at the FDI Statistics Workshop (20 March 2014) during the session on whether or not FDI statisics are still a useful metric when measuring investment globalisation.
Find out more at http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/measuring-globalisation-fdi-statistics-workshop-2014.htm
On 23 October 2013, the OECD launched the "Science, Technology and Industry (STI) Scoreboard: Innovation for Growth 2013" at its headquarters in Paris. The 260 indicators in the STI Scoreboard 2013 show how OECD and partner economies are performing in a wide range of areas to help governments design more effective and efficient policies and monitor progress towards their desired goals.
Olga M. & Manuel G. | K.J. Joseph
LECTURE 6: THE INSTITUTIONAL ASPECT OF NSI by Dr. Olga Mikheeva, UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, UK & Dr. Manuel Gonzalo, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, Brazil. CHAIR: Professor Joseph K.J., Gulati Institute of Finance and Taxation (GIFT), India
This document summarizes the legal advantages of registering intellectual property rights (IPR) in Kazakhstan. Registration provides protection under state law and prevents unauthorized use by others. It also allows for recorded licenses, pledges, and assignments related to the registered IPR. Statistics on trademark, patent, and other IPR applications and registrations in Kazakhstan are also presented, along with examples of high-profile registered IPR. The document concludes with reasons to formally register IPR such as confirmation of trademark use and ability to legally enforce rights against violations.
CloudsNN 2013 Анисимов Константин. Облачный рынок в цифрах и фактах.Clouds NN
Компания - Parallels. Должность - директор по маркетингу и альянсам.
Тема доклада - Облачный рынок в цифрах и фактах.
Расскажу все, что из себя представляет облачный рынок в России, в мире и куда это все придет через 2-3 года.
Investment Projects of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Ministry of Industry and New Technologies
of the Republic of Kazakhstan
National Export and Investment Agency
«KAZNEX INVEST», JSC
Что актуально на рынке ИТ для казахстанского ритейла? 2017Trade Help
Презентация управляющего компанией Trade Help Андрея Калмыкова на конференции Profit Retail Day 2017: Умные технологии в ритейле и сфере гостеприимства
The Importance of Intellectual Property in the Formation of an Innovative Eco...YogeshIJTSRD
This document discusses the importance of intellectual property in developing an innovative economy. It argues that intellectual property is crucial for modernization and economic competitiveness. The document analyzes data on intellectual property filings and economic growth in Uzbekistan. While intellectual property's share of GDP is still small there, filings for inventions and trademarks have increased as GDP has grown. The document concludes by recommending that Uzbekistan develop an intellectual property strategy, commercialize innovations, and strengthen international cooperation on intellectual property issues.
Ukraine: National Export Strategy Consultation. Innovation - An International...Subhrendu Chatterji
Introductory presentation to Ukranian National Export Strategy consultation participants on concepts re developing an export-oriented national innovation system and policies.
Emerging technology innovation systems: key considerations for policy making ...costi2014
This document outlines key considerations for policymaking and strategy development regarding emerging technologies. It discusses factors that influence high-tech innovation systems like limited commercial experience and access to venture capital. It also describes four paths of emerging technology innovation systems: science and technology push, entrepreneurial, system building, and market motors. The document then provides examples of country experiences with emerging technologies strategies, like Germany's focus on priority technologies and the UK's investments in seven high-potential technologies.
The document summarizes the main conclusions and recommendations of the Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan conducted by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) at the request of the Kazakh government. The review assessed Kazakhstan's national innovation system and policy framework, identifying strengths like high-level innovation prioritization, but also areas for improvement such as enhancing connectivity within the system and improving coherence of innovation policies. Key recommendations included strengthening industry-science linkages, knowledge generation and transfer, and making innovation support institutions more effective with improved linkages and regionalization. The UNECE expressed willingness to work with Kazakhstan on implementing the review's recommendations.
Problems and Prospects of Infrastructure and Innovative Development of Kazakh...Dr. Amarjeet Singh
This document summarizes an article about the problems and prospects of infrastructure and innovative development in Kazakhstan. It identifies several key problems inhibiting innovation in Kazakhstan, including a lack of investment in research and development, technological backwardness, and underdeveloped scientific sector. It also proposes some solutions, such as attracting more foreign investment, developing high-tech industries, establishing technology parks, and increasing state funding for innovation projects. Overall, the document argues that Kazakhstan needs to overcome technological degradation and transition to an industrial-innovative economy focused on high-tech industries in order to accelerate economic growth.
The Challenge and the Opportunity of Smart SpecialisationDimitri Corpakis
The document discusses the concept of smart specialization and its importance for European regions. It defines smart specialization as an entrepreneurial process of discovery to identify promising research and innovation opportunities where a region can excel, based on its existing industrial strengths and emerging technologies. This involves strategic technological diversification in areas of competitive advantage identified through an evidence-based strategy. The strategy development process should include stakeholder involvement and aim to stimulate private investment while increasing synergies. Smart specialization is seen as key to helping regions adapt to globalization and positioning themselves in global value chains through innovation-driven economic transformation.
In 2017, the Innovations Development Platform published the introduction of the Strategy of Innovations Development in Ukraine offering a clear plan to activate innovation development processes [7]. In fact, the strategy meeting was held and the Innovation Development Board has been formed in Ukraine. Besides, the Board has held the advisory meeting, and the Plan of Innovations Development in Ukraine has been elaborated. Presently, the Ukrainian economy requires progressing to further stages, i.e. auditing of the current regulatory environment, development and approving of the new legislative framework and further adoption of the new laws.
Strategy of Innovations Development in Ukraine Part II. Action Plan (Dmytro S...Dmytro Shestakov
In 2017, the Innovations Development Platform published the introduction of the Strategy of Innovations Development in Ukraine offering a clear plan to activate innovation development processes [7]. In fact, the strategy meeting was held and the Innovation Development Board has been formed in Ukraine. Besides, the Board has held the advisory meeting, and the Plan of Innovations Development in Ukraine has been elaborated. Presently, the Ukrainian economy requires progressing to further stages, i.e. auditing of the current regulatory environment, development and approving of the new legislative framework and further adoption of the new laws.
Russia is pursuing several approaches to innovation policy including developing a national innovation infrastructure and state science and technology policies. The national innovation infrastructure aims to foster interaction between research institutions and businesses through various programs and initiatives like Skolkovo Innovation Center, universities receiving government support, and special economic zones that provide tax incentives. The state is also working to correct directions in science and technology policy by accelerating applied research, prioritizing breakthrough technologies, and creating a unified research infrastructure. Technology platforms are being established to bring together government, business, and academia to identify innovative challenges and develop strategic research programs. Over 30 technology platforms have been launched covering priority sectors like medicine, IT, energy, and materials.
The OECD is contributing to the concept of 'Smart Specialisation' or 'S3' in three main ways:
1) By promoting growth in regions through evidence-based innovation policies and indicators as well as developing an open platform for knowledge sharing.
2) By conducting case studies with 11-15 regions and countries to identify regional specialization profiles and best practices for going beyond existing strategies.
3) By establishing a virtual community to build strategic intelligence on smart specialization through an OECD innovation policy platform and knowledge sharing.
This document discusses the integrated approach for developing advanced materials and systems in the Horizon 2020 program. It provides an overview of key enabling technologies and their role in competitiveness. Horizon 2020 aims to bring together excellent science, industrial leadership, and addressing societal challenges. The priorities for nanotechnologies and advanced materials calls in 2014-2015 are outlined, focusing on developing technologies from research to market deployment. Future directions emphasize further vertical and horizontal integration, addressing both industrial and policy needs.
The Basque Science Technology and Innovation NetworkTR3S PROJECT
The Basque Science, Technology and Innovation Network (RVCTI in Spanish) was established in 1997 in order to develop a market and client-oriented smart technological infrastructure for complementary and coordinated networking. It aims at providing an integrated, sophisticated and specialised technology offer to the Basque business sector.
Public-Private Partnership in Innovation Policygo.growth
The document discusses strategies for modernizing Europe's innovation policy from 2008-2010 based on public-private partnerships. It covers several key points:
1. Improving regulation, funding, intellectual property use, and public procurement to foster more research and innovation across Europe.
2. Mobilizing both public and private resources for key technologies and ensuring research funds drive innovation.
3. Strengthening university-industry partnerships and providing business support to stimulate research and innovation.
4. The need for coherent innovation policies at both the national and EU level that reduce barriers and better support policy learning across countries.
Skolkovo Foundation was created in Russia to address declining innovation and the outflow of scientists. Its mission is to establish an innovation ecosystem in key technology areas. It aims to attract young businesses and intellectual capital through attractive conditions. Skolkovo Foundation provides funding, expertise and coordination to support research and development by participants. Its goals are to accelerate new business and technology, with an emphasis on private property and competition over state control.
Dr. Andrea Goldstein - Industrial Cluster in the Global EconomyIra Tobing
This document discusses several topics related to industrial clusters and global value chains. It begins by noting the changing landscape in global trade away from multilateralism towards regional trade agreements. It then discusses the concept of global value chains and some challenges in measuring them. Several case studies are presented, including the global production of a Boeing Dreamliner airplane and a Nokia cell phone. Key points are made about the importance of small and medium enterprises, cluster theory, and examples of regional industrial policies from Korea. Smart specialization strategies and linkages between multinational enterprises and small suppliers are also addressed.
Horizon2020 - Stimulating Research and Innovation Investments for Growth and ...Invest Northern Ireland
The document discusses synergies between the Horizon 2020 program and future Cohesion Policy (2014-2020) regarding research and innovation investments. It notes that while Horizon 2020 focuses on transnational projects and excellence, Cohesion Policy supports place-based regional development through smart specialization strategies. The goal is to increase synergies by identifying complementarities between the programs, such as Horizon 2020 focusing on major challenges and competitiveness while Cohesion Policy builds regional innovation capacities. The Commission provides assistance to member states and regions in developing and implementing smart specialization strategies.
On August 18 2014, Mr. Mikhail Rogachev, Fund Director of the Russian Foundation for Technological Development (hereinafter – RFTD or the Fund) held a lecture for students of the Discovering Entrepreneurship Summer School (arranged by HSE laboratory for studies of entrepreneurship in conjunction with the University of Sheffield/Great Britain, University of Twente /Enschede and the University of Groningen/the Netherlands). The lecture addressed issues of state policy in the field of innovations (Orders of the Prime Minister No. DM-P36-6057 d/d 9 August 2014) and featured typical models of the Fund financial support for R&D projects.
Pakistan Software and Information Technology PakistanWajid Hassan
The document discusses plans to establish IT and software technology parks in Pakistan to strengthen the country's economy. It notes that Pakistan has over 300,000 English-speaking IT professionals and the potential to develop an IT sector. The proposed parks would provide infrastructure and business services to companies. A multi-component strategy is outlined, including reviewing best practices, policies, case studies, and developing an investment plan. The parks could attract foreign investment and jobs while helping develop IT skills. Challenges include a lack of research facilities and practical job skills, but the parks may address weaknesses and leverage opportunities to grow Pakistan's presence in the global IT industry.
Similar to Intellectual Property Policies for Innovation in Kazakhstan (20)
OECD bibliometric indicators: Selected highlights, April 2024innovationoecd
This document summarizes bibliometric indicators from the OECD based on data from Elsevier's Scopus database. It shows trends in scientific publication output, citation rates, collaboration, and mobility for countries and regions from 2011-2022. It also includes perspectives on artificial intelligence research and research related to long term challenges like environmental science and energy. The data can be explored further using the OECD's STI.Scoreboard platform (https://oe.cd/sti-scoreboard) and OECD Data Explorer (https://data-explorer.oecd.org) bibliometric datasets.
Presentation of the OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023innovationoecd
OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023: Enabling Transitions in Times of Disruption.
Find out more and access the publication at https://www.oecd.org/sti/science-technology-innovation-outlook/
OECD bibliometric indicators: Selected highlights, March 2023 editioninnovationoecd
This document summarizes bibliometric indicators from the OECD based on data from Elsevier's Scopus database. It shows trends in scientific publication output, citation rates, collaboration, and mobility for countries and regions from 2010-2021. It also includes perspectives on COVID-19 research and research related to long term challenges like environmental science and energy. The data can be explored further using the OECD's STI.Scoreboard platform and datasets.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Analysis of scientific publishing activity: Key findings, December 2021innovationoecd
OECD bibliometric data has been updated and now includes preliminary data for 2020. The indicators are based on Scopus Custom Data, Elsevier, Version 5.2021.
Find out more about OECD work on scientometrics and bibliometrics at https://oe.cd/scientometrics
Recommandation du Conseil de l'OCDE sur l'amélioration de l'accès aux données...innovationoecd
Optimiser les bénéfices intersectoriels et transfrontières de l'accès aux données et de leur partage, tout en protégeant les droits des parties prenantes
Recommandation adoptée en octobre 2021. En savoir plus : https://oe.cd/easd21fr
OECD Council Recommendation on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Datainnovationoecd
Maximising the cross-sectoral and cross-border benefits of data access and sharing while protecting the rights of stakeholders
Recommendation adopted in October 2021. Find our more at https://oe.cd/easd21
2020.01.12 OECD STI Outlook launch - Impacts of COVID-19: How STI systems res...innovationoecd
The document summarizes key points from the OECD STI Outlook report. It notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered an unprecedented mobilization of scientific research, with billions pledged for research initiatives. Science and technology offer the only exit from the pandemic, but the crisis has also exposed gaps in research systems. Going forward, STI policies need to be reoriented to tackle challenges like sustainability and resilience. International collaboration will remain critical for solving global problems.
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2020: Key findingsinnovationoecd
The document discusses the OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2020 report which examines the state of the digital economy and the impact of COVID-19. Some key findings include: connectivity has improved but gaps remain, internet and technology use varies between individuals and businesses, and COVID-19 has accelerated digital adoption and highlighted the importance of technology. The report argues that digital strategies need to be broadened to better support economic recovery as the digital economy becomes more integral.
Understanding the world of science and scientistsinnovationoecd
The 2018 OECD International Survey of Scientific Authors (ISSA) surveyed over 12,000 scientific authors to understand trends in scientific research and the digitalization of science. Key findings include: 1) Most authors are between 35-45 years old and work in universities or government agencies. 2) 65% of authors' work results in new data or code. 3) Social networks are commonly used to disseminate research information to wider audiences, while data sharing practices vary significantly by field. 4) Computer science stands out in use of digital tools like big data and computational methods.
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity November 2019 event photo bookinnovationoecd
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity: Encouraging Digital Security Innovation, London, 14-15 November 2019. Programme and event information available at oe.cd/gfdsp
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity December 2018 event photo bookinnovationoecd
These photos were taken at the first meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity, held on 13-14 December 2018 in Paris, France. The Global Forum brings together experts and policy makers to foster regular sharing of experiences and good practice on digital security risk and its management, as well as mutual learning and convergence of views on digital security for economic and social prosperity. It is an international multilateral and multidisciplinary setting for all stakeholder communities. Global Forum website: oe.cd/gfdsp
#GFDSP
Participants at the December 2018 event examined the roles and responsibilities of actors for digital security and cybersecurity, with a focus on good practice for the governance of digital security risk in organisations, and improving digital security of technologies throughout their lifecycle.
The event included speakers from:
- Cybersecurity agencies of France (ANSSI), Germany (BSI), Israel (INCD), United States (DHS CISA), Malaysia, European Union (ENISA)
- Ministries from Brazil (Foreign Affairs), France (Foreign Affairs), Germany (Foreign Affairs), Japan (Min. of Economy, Trade and Industry - METI, Min. of Internal Affairs and Communication - MIC), Mexico (Instituto Federal de
Telecomunicaciones), Netherlands (Economic Affairs and Climate Policy), Norway (Min. of Local Government and Modernisation), United Kingdom (Dept. of Culture, Media, and Sports - DCMS), United States (Dept. of Commerce, Dept. of Homeland Security - DHS)
- Business: A.P. Møller – Maersk, Airbus, Deutsche Telekom, Intel, Microsoft, TÜV SÜD, YesWeHack.
- Civil society, Academia, Technical community (incl. CERT Brazil)
- Other organisations: Federation of European Risk Management Associations (FERMA), Digital Infrastructure Netherlands Foundation (DINL), FS-ISAC, Internet Society ISOC & Online Trust Alliance OTA, BEUC, CEPS, BIAC, CSISAC, ITAC
Other key speakers included:
- Angel Gurría, Secretary-General, OECD
- Guillaume Poupard, Director General, Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d'Information, ANSSI, France
- Pascal Andrei, Chief Security Officer, Airbus
- Arne Schönbohm, President, Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Germany
- Bruce Schneier, Author
- Marietje Schaake, Member of European Parliament
- Henri Verdier, Ambassador for Digital Affairs, France
- Ambassador Thomas Fitschen, Special Representative for Cyber Foreign Policy and
Cybersecurity, Germany
- Matthew Travis, Deputy Director, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), United States
- Carlos da Fonseca, Head of the Information Society Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Brazil
The Oslo Manual is the international reference guide for collecting and using data on innovation. In this new 4th edition, published in October 2018, the manual has been updated to take into account a broader range of innovation-related phenomena as well as the experience gained from recent rounds of innovation surveys in OECD countries and partner economies and organisations.
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017: Setting the foundations for the digital tr...innovationoecd
The Digital Economy Outlook 2017 shows how Internet infrastructure and usage varies across countries and firms in the OECD area. It looks at policy implications of the digital transformation as well as a wide array of trends. Report available at http://oe.cd/deo2017 - See also the OECD Going Digital project: www.oecd.org/going-digital
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017: Presentation at Global Parliamentary Netwo...innovationoecd
The Digital Economy Outlook 2017 shows how Internet infrastructure and usage varies across countries and firms in the OECD area. It looks at policy implications of the digital transformation as well as a wide array of trends. Report available at http://oe.cd/deo2017
Presentation for the OECD Telecommunication and Broadcasting Review of Mexico...innovationoecd
4 years after Mexico overhauled its telecommunication and broadcasting sectors with a major legal and regulatory reform, a new OECD Review assesses the impact on communication markets, businesses and households. It recommends further measures for the telecommunication and broadcasting sectors to build on this progress and ensure Mexico reaps maximum benefits from the digital transformation. Gabriela Ramos, the OECD Chief of Staff, G20 Sherpa and Special Advisor to the Secretary-General, presented the OECD Telecommunication and Broadcasting Review of México 2017 along with Andrew Wyckoff, Director of Science, Technology and Innovation, OECD, Communications and Transport Minister Gerardo Ruiz Esparza and Federal Telecommunications Institute President Commissioner Gabriel Oswaldo Contreras Saldívar on 31 August 2017 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Mexico City.
This presentation by Tim Capel, Director of the UK Information Commissioner’s Office Legal Service, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Why Psychological Safety Matters for Software Teams - ACE 2024 - Ben Linders.pdfBen Linders
Psychological safety in teams is important; team members must feel safe and able to communicate and collaborate effectively to deliver value. It’s also necessary to build long-lasting teams since things will happen and relationships will be strained.
But, how safe is a team? How can we determine if there are any factors that make the team unsafe or have an impact on the team’s culture?
In this mini-workshop, we’ll play games for psychological safety and team culture utilizing a deck of coaching cards, The Psychological Safety Cards. We will learn how to use gamification to gain a better understanding of what’s going on in teams. Individuals share what they have learned from working in teams, what has impacted the team’s safety and culture, and what has led to positive change.
Different game formats will be played in groups in parallel. Examples are an ice-breaker to get people talking about psychological safety, a constellation where people take positions about aspects of psychological safety in their team or organization, and collaborative card games where people work together to create an environment that fosters psychological safety.
This presentation by Yong Lim, Professor of Economic Law at Seoul National University School of Law, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Nathaniel Lane, Associate Professor in Economics at Oxford University, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Juraj Čorba, Chair of OECD Working Party on Artificial Intelligence Governance (AIGO), was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Gamify it until you make it Improving Agile Development and Operations with ...Ben Linders
So many challenges, so little time. While we’re busy developing software and keeping it operational, we also need to sharpen the saw, but how? Gamification can be a way to look at how you’re doing and find out where to improve. It’s a great way to have everyone involved and get the best out of people.
In this presentation, Ben Linders will show how playing games with the DevOps coaching cards can help to explore your current development and deployment (DevOps) practices and decide as a team what to improve or experiment with.
The games that we play are based on an engagement model. Instead of imposing change, the games enable people to pull in ideas for change and apply those in a way that best suits their collective needs.
By playing games, you can learn from each other. Teams can use games, exercises, and coaching cards to discuss values, principles, and practices, and share their experiences and learnings.
Different game formats can be used to share experiences on DevOps principles and practices and explore how they can be applied effectively. This presentation provides an overview of playing formats and will inspire you to come up with your own formats.
1.) Introduction
Our Movement is not new; it is the same as it was for Freedom, Justice, and Equality since we were labeled as slaves. However, this movement at its core must entail economics.
2.) Historical Context
This is the same movement because none of the previous movements, such as boycotts, were ever completed. For some, maybe, but for the most part, it’s just a place to keep your stable until you’re ready to assimilate them into your system. The rest of the crabs are left in the world’s worst parts, begging for scraps.
3.) Economic Empowerment
Our Movement aims to show that it is indeed possible for the less fortunate to establish their economic system. Everyone else – Caucasian, Asian, Mexican, Israeli, Jews, etc. – has their systems, and they all set up and usurp money from the less fortunate. So, the less fortunate buy from every one of them, yet none of them buy from the less fortunate. Moreover, the less fortunate really don’t have anything to sell.
4.) Collaboration with Organizations
Our Movement will demonstrate how organizations such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, National Urban League, Black Lives Matter, and others can assist in creating a much more indestructible Black Wall Street.
5.) Vision for the Future
Our Movement will not settle for less than those who came before us and stopped before the rights were equal. The economy, jobs, healthcare, education, housing, incarceration – everything is unfair, and what isn’t is rigged for the less fortunate to fail, as evidenced in society.
6.) Call to Action
Our movement has started and implemented everything needed for the advancement of the economic system. There are positions for only those who understand the importance of this movement, as failure to address it will continue the degradation of the people deemed less fortunate.
No, this isn’t Noah’s Ark, nor am I a Prophet. I’m just a man who wrote a couple of books, created a magnificent website: http://www.thearkproject.llc, and who truly hopes to try and initiate a truly sustainable economic system for deprived people. We may not all have the same beliefs, but if our methods are tried, tested, and proven, we can come together and help others. My website: http://www.thearkproject.llc is very informative and considerably controversial. Please check it out, and if you are afraid, leave immediately; it’s no place for cowards. The last Prophet said: “Whoever among you sees an evil action, then let him change it with his hand [by taking action]; if he cannot, then with his tongue [by speaking out]; and if he cannot, then, with his heart – and that is the weakest of faith.” [Sahih Muslim] If we all, or even some of us, did this, there would be significant change. We are able to witness it on small and grand scales, for example, from climate control to business partnerships. I encourage, invite, and challenge you all to support me by visiting my website.
• For a full set of 530+ questions. Go to
https://skillcertpro.com/product/servicenow-cis-itsm-exam-questions/
• SkillCertPro offers detailed explanations to each question which helps to understand the concepts better.
• It is recommended to score above 85% in SkillCertPro exams before attempting a real exam.
• SkillCertPro updates exam questions every 2 weeks.
• You will get life time access and life time free updates
• SkillCertPro assures 100% pass guarantee in first attempt.
This presentation by Katharine Kemp, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law & Justice at UNSW Sydney, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
The importance of sustainable and efficient computational practices in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning has become increasingly critical. This webinar focuses on the intersection of sustainability and AI, highlighting the significance of energy-efficient deep learning, innovative randomization techniques in neural networks, the potential of reservoir computing, and the cutting-edge realm of neuromorphic computing. This webinar aims to connect theoretical knowledge with practical applications and provide insights into how these innovative approaches can lead to more robust, efficient, and environmentally conscious AI systems.
Webinar Speaker: Prof. Claudio Gallicchio, Assistant Professor, University of Pisa
Claudio Gallicchio is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer Science of the University of Pisa, Italy. His research involves merging concepts from Deep Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Randomized Neural Systems, and he has co-authored over 100 scientific publications on the subject. He is the founder of the IEEE CIS Task Force on Reservoir Computing, and the co-founder and chair of the IEEE Task Force on Randomization-based Neural Networks and Learning Systems. He is an associate editor of IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (TNNLS).
This presentation by Thibault Schrepel, Associate Professor of Law at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam University, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition – SCHREPEL – June 2024 OECD dis...
Intellectual Property Policies for Innovation in Kazakhstan
1. BOOSTING KAZAKHSTAN'S
NATIONAL INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY SYSTEM FOR
INNOVATION
Science and Technology Policy Division
OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation
National Intellectual Property Systems,
Innovation and Economic Development
2. Project background
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and
innovation potential
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s intellectual
property (IP) system
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan
Creating the conditions for IP markets
Policy recommendations
Overview
1
2
3
4
5
6
2
3. Project background
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and
innovation potential
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s intellectual
property (IP) system
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan
Creating the conditions for IP markets
Policy recommendations
1
2
3
4
5
6
Overview
3
4. Intellectual property rights serve innovation
in multiple ways
IP
Rights
Shape incentives to invent, to transfer knowledge and
to implement new technologies
Facilitate access to knowledge and inventions
Resolve information asymmetries
Facilitate international trade
Enhance access to finance for innovation
4
Project background1
5. ... hence IP policies can have an impact on socio-
economic development
IP policies are complementary
to other innovation policies
5
Project background1
6. Context and objective of the project
Context
• Decisive role of innovation in
developing and emerging
countries
• Importance of IP rights and
related policies for innovation
• Need to incorporate the
development dimension into
discussions of IP
Objective
• Support countries in
strengthening the
contributions of their
national IP systems to
innovation
–Identify strengths and
weaknesses in IP systems
–Provide policy
recommendations
For more information, go to project website!
6
Project background1
7. The project has two main phases:
development of framework and implementation
Conceptual
framework Implementation
Map actors, conditions, policies
and relations of IP systems:
1. Organisation of IP systems
and policy design
2. Universe of active and
potential IP users:
• SMEs
• large companies
• research
institutes/universities,
• traditional sectors
3. IP markets and diffusion
4. IP policies for innovation
A B
IP reviews based on conceptual
framework:
• Colombia (2014)
• Indonesia (2014)
• Malaysia (2015)
• Kazakhstan (2016)
7
Project background1
8. • Stakeholder interviews with 22
institutions in Kazakhstan
• Collection and analysis of country
information (evidence & statistics)
• Feedback and consultation with
Kazakh stakeholders
Current report evaluates Kazakhstan IP system …
8
Implementation
Project background1
9. … and defines 4 key priorities and 22 detailed
recommendations
For overall assessment and full list of policy
recommendations, see Chapter 1 of the report.!
9
Facilitate SMEs’ and traditional sectors’ use of trademarks,
industrial designs and utility models – in addition to patents – in
support of developing an innovative private sector and fostering their access
to relevant IP (including from abroad).
Adapt IP policies currently targeted to universities and public research
institutions (PRIs) to enhance their contributions to private sector
development.
Improve intra-governmental co-ordination in IP policy design and
implementation.
4 priorities:
1
2
3
Project background1
Adopt a sectoral focus in IP policies, to strengthen their effects on
innovation (i.e. start by fostering IP use and strengthening IP
commercialisation expertise in specific priority sectors, such as the
agricultural and textile sectors).
4
10. Kazakhstan’s IP review also contributes to other
projects
10
OECD Reviews of
Innovation Policy
• Comprehensive assessment of the
innovation system of different
countries
• The Review of Innovation Policy of
Kazakhstan is to be released soon
• See project’s website
OECD Innovation for
Inclusive Growth project
• This project analyses the impact
of innovation and related
policies on inclusive growth.
• See project’s website
Project background1
11. Project background
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions
and innovation potential
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s intellectual
property (IP) system
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan
Creating the conditions for IP markets
Policy recommendations
1
2
3
4
5
6
Overview
11
12. Kazakhstan has experienced substantial economic
progress since its independence
For full analysis of the socio-
economic conditions and innovation
potential, see Chapter 2 of the
report
!
Transition to a
market system
1991
Upper-middle-
income country
Today
Heavy reliance on extractive
industries, with diversification
efforts
• Services (55% GDP, 2014)
• Oil and gas industry (25% of
GDP, 1% of employment)
• Mining and metallurgy
industries (9% of GDP, 5% of
employment)
• Agriculture (4.5% of GDP, 26%
of employment)
12
Goal to become
among the top 30
global economies by
2050
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and innovation potential2
Figure 1. GDP growth in Kazakhstan, 1991-
2014 (annual %)
13. But Kazakhstan’s innovation performance is still weak
13
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and innovation potential2
• State-owned companies (SOEs) dominate most industries: they
import ready-to-use equipment and technologies from abroad
• Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have a low
contribution to the national economy (26.2% of GDP and 33% of
employment in 2014) and engage little in innovation.
• Inward foreign direct investment (FDI) is concentrated mainly in
the extractive industries lack of investment in R&D-related facilities.
• Innovation capacities are concentrated in universities and public
research institutes (PRIs): they account for over 50% of the
country’s R&D expenditure.
• Low relevance of university research to industry.
14. 14
Innovation is now viewed as key for development…yet
challenges persist
Obstacles to innovation
• Gross expenditure in R&D (GERD)
remains very low
• Scarcity of skilled human capital
• Lack of science-industry linkages
• Low relevance of university
research to industry
• Lack of finance for innovators
• Bureaucratic barriers to doing
business
Figure 2. Gross expenditure on R&D in
Kazakhstan and selected countries
(% of GDP)
Source: World Bank, 2016. World Development Indicators
• Increased policy support for innovation with the objective to build a
diversified, knowledge-based economy (“2050 Strategy”)
• ICT infrastructure has improved over the past decade
Context for innovation
15. Project background
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and
innovation potential
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s
intellectual property (IP) system
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan
Creating the conditions for IP markets
Policy recommendations
1
2
3
4
5
6
Overview
15
16. • IP legal framework and
institutions have improved over the
past years.
• International conventions and
regional and bilateral treaties for
IP protection have been signed
(incl. Patent Cooperation Treaty and
the Eurasian Patent Convention).
• Satisfying IP processing
performance (according to interview
feedbacks).
Kazakhstan has good formal conditions for a well-
functioning IP system
Kazakhstan IP system
For full analysis of the organisation of Kazakhstan’s IP system,
see Chapter 3 of the report! 16
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s IP system3
Table 1. Procedures for obtaining invention
patent rights in Kazakhstan
As member of WTO since 2015, Kazakhstan has adopted the
Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)
Procedure
type
National
procedure
Eurasian
procedure
PCT procedure
Governing
laws
National Patent
Law
Eurasian Patent
Convention
PCT national phase
or the regional
(Eurasian) phase’s
corresponding
regulations
Substantive
examination
Yes Yes Yes
Conversions To utility model
To national
application
Language
Kazakh and
Russian
Russian Kazakh and Russian
17. Court system,
police and customs
But the governance of the national IP system is complex
17
Committee of
Science Technology
Commercialization
Centre LLP (TCC)
Ministry of Education and Science
Department of International
Economic Integration
Ministry of the National Economy
State Inspection for Pedigree Breeds and the
State Commission for Crop Variety Testing
Ministry of Agriculture
Granting of IP and
enforcement
IP for
innovation
Foreign Investors’ Council
IP for FDI
and trade
IP users
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s IP system3
Department for
Intellectual
Property Rights
National Institute
of Intellectual
Property (NIIP)
Ministry of Justice
National Agency for
Technological Development
(NATD)
Ministry of Investment and Development
Small and medium sized
enterprises (SMEs)
State-owned
enterprises (SOEs)
Foreign
firms
Traditional
sectors
Universities, PRIs &
individual inventors
18. Improving intra-governmental co-ordination in IP policy
design and implementation is key
18
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s IP system3
Aspect Challenges faced by Kazakhstan’s IP system
Institutional
• Co-ordinating inter-ministry efforts to address IP issues that affect national
innovation performance
Policy related
• Proposing and revising IP-related laws and regulations to further promote
innovation
• Optimising and linking IP-related policies on public research funded by
different ministries
• Promoting the use of IP in targeted agriculture and industrial sectors
Operational
• Building/upgrading intellectual property infrastructure, including a free,
open and user-friendly information portal of intellectual property, an e-
platform of IP market
• Raising general IP awareness
• Exploring the provision of IP valuation services in the country
19. Project background
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and
innovation potential
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s intellectual
property (IP) system
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan
Creating the conditions for IP markets
Policy recommendations
1
2
3
4
5
6
Overview
19
20. Kazakh residents use IP little by international standards
Figure 3. Resident patent applications and gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD), five-year
average, 2009-2013
20
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan4
For full analysis of the characteristics and statistics of IP use, see
Chapter 4 of the report
!
Notes: 1. A resident application is an application filed with an
IP office by an applicant residing in the country/region in
which that office has jurisdiction. 2. A ranking of “a resident
patent applications-per-GERD” out of 55 offices for which data
are available is displayed in parentheses.
Sources: OECD calculations based on WIPO (2015), WIPO
Statistics (database), www.wipo.int/ipstats/
en#data; OECD (2015), Main Science and Technology
Indicators (database), http://stats.oecd.org/Index
.aspx?QueryId=33210; UNESCO (2015), UIS.Stat (database),
http://stats.uis.unesco.org; NIIP (2013),
Annual Report 2013, http://kazpatent.kz/2013_annual_report
for 2012 resident patent applications data.
21. 21
… and there are limited signs of increasing IP use
over the past decade
Resident patent & trademark
applications have remained stable IP imports have increased
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan4
Figure 3. Evolution of resident patent
applications in Kazakhstan and selected
countries (2004 = 100)
Figure 4. Evolution of royalties and
licensing fee payments in Kazakhstan and
selected countries (2005 = 100)
Source: WIPO, 2015 Source: World Bank, 2015
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Belarus Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan
Russia Hungary Malaysia
Poland Thailand Ukraine
0
100
200
300
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Belarus Kazakhstan Russia Malaysia
Poland Thailand Ukraine Hungary
22. The use of utility models and industrial designs is low
22
• Resident patent applications per million population have been at
around 100 per year for 2004-14 (Russia is 167 in 2014).
• Patent filings in foreign offices by Kazakh residents have been almost
negligible.
• Trademark applications by Kazakh residents have remained relatively
stable since 2000 (nearly 150 per million population in 2014).
• Utility models and industrial designs are not used much.
• 37 geographical indications (GI) registered (as of Dec. 2015): most of
them correspond to foreign products (only 5 correspond to Kazakh
products)
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan4
23. • Universities and public research
institutes
Accounted for 54% of granted
patents in 2015
Concentrated among a few
institutions
• SMEs
• Traditional and informal sectors
• State-owned enterprises (SOEs)
23
Not all user groups are equally active
Most active users Least active users+ -
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan4
Rank Name of institution Number of patents
1 Satpaev Kazakh National Technical University 69
2 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University 33
3 Gumilyov Eurasian National University 31
4 Bekturov Institute for Chemical Sciences 31
5 Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University 13
Figure 5. Top 5 Kazakh institutions by number of patents granted by the national
patent office, 2014
Source: Information provided to the OECD by the National Center for Scientific and
Technological Information (NCSTI).
24. Recent initiatives aimed at increasing IP users and
fostering innovation (1/2)
24
Law on Commercialization of Scientific Activities (2015)
Main objectives of the law:
• Increase transparency among participants in processes of commercialisation
• Guarantee the rights of researchers involved in invention processes
• Provide economic incentives for the commercialisation of scientific activities in
the priority sectors of the economy
• Increase the integration of education, science, industry and institutions engaged
in innovative development
To ensure its successful implementation, it will be critical to provide:
Technical support to facilitate implementation in universities and PRIs
Guidelines & model contracts covering options for IP commercialisation
Guidelines for assessing the value of IP
Effective incentives for researchers to collaborate with industry
More flexibility to researchers to engage in spin-offs
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan4
For more detailed analysis, see Chapter 5 (section 5.1.2) of the report!
25. Recent initiatives aimed at increasing IP users and
fostering innovation (2/2)
25
More R&D investments, grants for commercialisation, IP registration
fee reductions and training courses
• The Samruk-Kazyna sovereign wealth fund – the manager of most SOEs – is
required by law to invest at least 10% of its net profit in R&D.
• 2012 amendments to mineral legislation require firms active in the subsoil
sector to invest at least 1% of total revenue in R&D activities in Kazakhstan
• 20% discount on IP registration fees for SMEs
• Increasing number of grants for technology commercialisation (7 grants
awarded in 2011, 10 in 2012, 19 in 2013, 29 in 2014)
• Free training courses on IP offered to entrepreneurs and SMEs by
different institutions
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan4
26. Project background
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and
innovation potential
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s intellectual
property (IP) system
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan
Creating the conditions for IP markets
Policy recommendations
1
2
3
4
5
6
Overview
26
27. Initiatives:
• Creation of technology transfer offices (TTOs) &
agencies to provide advice to potential IP buyers
• Provision of knowledge broker services by NCSTI
• Online technology platform by NCSTI showcasting
results of public research and patents registered in
Kazakhstan (but no longer updated)
• Creation of a catalogue of marketable
technologies in the country by the TCC
27
There have been early efforts to create infrastructure
and establish the legal and administrative conditions to
enable IP markets
Creating the conditions for IP markets5
For full analysis of conditions and challenges for creating IP
markets in Kazakhstan, see Chapter 6 of the report
!
To date
however
there have
been few
success
stories
28. • Low quality of research for commercialisation
• Low demand for technology by the business sector,
partly due to limited capacities to commercialize IP
• Excessive bureaucracy, restrictions and absence
of incentives for researchers to partner with industry
• Low managerial and entrepreneurial capacities of
universities
• High costs in finding sellers and buyers
• Lack of legal rules or guidelines on IP valuation
28
But there are still challenges to the creation of
dynamic IP markets in Kazakhstan
29. 29
Policy needs to initially focus on connecting potential
IP suppliers and buyers
Facilitate connection between
potential suppliers and buyers
Facilitate IP valuation
Objectives Examples of suggested measures
• Provide advice on valuation approach to follow
• Establish a system to record IP transactions
• Develop local skills base for IP valuation
• Use IP guidelines developed abroad and adjust
to national needs
Facilitate IP financing
1
2
In the long term
• Set up an adequate legal framework
• Focus on collateralisation or securitisation of
licensed patents or copyrights
• Provide government support for IP financing
(e.g. subsidize interests, provide guarantees)
• Create an online information platform on all
types of IP for license or sale (also connected to
international platforms)
• Provide specialised brokerage services
Once linkages are established
3
30. Project background
Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and
innovation potential
Organisation of Kazakhstan’s intellectual
property (IP) system
Different IP user groups in Kazakhstan
Creating the conditions for IP markets
Policy recommendations
1
2
3
4
5
6
Overview
30
31. Improvement of IP governance and private sector
access to IP
31
Policy recommendations6
Priorities Recommendations*
IP policy
co-ordination
Improve intra-governmental co-ordination of IP policy design
and implementation (r.2)
Define IP policy responsibilities of institutions engaged in IP
system (r.3)
Private sector access
to IP (beyond
patents)
Provide IP training and technical support to SMEs (r.14)
Support the creation of trademarks for food products and
traditional handcrafts (r.16)
Support policies focused on SMEs and traditional sectors (r. 13)
Create a new prize for innovative SMEs actively using IP (r. 15)
Foster the use of franchises in the food and textile sectors (r. 21)
Promote sourcing of Kazakh technologies by state-owned
enterprises (r. 17)
For full list of policy recommendations,
see sections 1.2 and 1.3 of the report!
* The numbers following each recommendation stand for the number of the corresponding recommendation as listed in the report.
32. 32
Adapt IP policies currently targeted at universities
and PRIs to enhance their contribution to private
sector development
Priorities Recommendations*
Commercialisation
of public research
and private sector
development
Develop guidelines and tools to facilitate commercialisation (r.9)
Reform researchers’ rewards system to incentivise research
commercialisation (r.11)
Introduce new performance measures for university funding (r.10)
Empower a central agency to promote IP commercialisation (r.8)
Support spin-off creation conditional on quality (r.12)
Strengthen the quality of technology transfer office services (r.7)
Promote sourcing of Kazakh technologies by state-owned
enterprises (r.17)
Expand the technology screening activities of the National Agency
for Technological Development (r.18)
Connect with global technology markets (r.19)
* The numbers following each recommendation stand for the number of the corresponding recommendation as listed in the report.
33. Sectoral approach to IP, more transparency in IP
processing and beyond
33
Policy recommendations6
* The numbers following each recommendation stand for the number of the corresponding recommendation as listed in the report.
Priorities Recommendations*
Sectoral approach
to IP policies
Empower central agency to promote IP commercialisation,
building expertise in specific sectors (r.8)
Foster the use of franchises in the food and textile sectors (r.21)
IP processing
Provide free, open access to information on IP registered and
applied for in Kazakhstan (r. 4)
Publish information on NIIP’s processing procedures and
pendency statistics (r.5)
Improve the information system on IP transactions to facilitate
the future development of markets for technology (r.6)
Beyond IP policy
Implementation of complementary innovation policies (r.1)
Use the improvements in IP system to attract R&D related FDI
(r.20)
34. Executive summary
Chapter 1. Overall assessment and recommendations
- Overview of Kazakhstan’s IP system
- Identification of IP policy priorities for Kazakhstan
- Detailed recommendations for Kazakhstan
Chapter 2. Kazakhstan’s socio-economic conditions and innovation potential
- Kazakhstan´s socio-economic development, industry structure, trade patterns, FDI
- Conditions for innovation: human capital, access to finance and infrastructure
- Kazakhstan’s national innovation system
- Policy and governance of science, technology and innovation
Chapter 3. Organisation of Kazakhstan’s intellectual property system
- Overview of IP laws and regulations
- Governmental stakeholders and co-ordination mechanisms
- IP operations and procedures
- Challenges for Kazakhstan’s IP system
Publication content details (1/2)
34
35. Chapter 4. Intellectual property use in Kazakhstan: Statistics
- Statistics on patents, utility models, trademarks, industrial design, geographical
indications, copyright, royalties and licensing fees.
Chapter 5. Opportunities and challenges of Kazakhstan’s IP system for different
user groups
- Public research institutes and universities
- Traditional and informal sectors
- “Catching-up” businesses: SMEs and young companies
- Leading “frontier” businesses
Chapter 6. Developing IP markets in Kazakhstan
- Enabling commercialisation of public research
- Addressing IP valuation in the future
- IP financing: preconditions and steps to be undertaken
Publication content details (2/2)
35