Information Literacy: Finding Information
•Download as PPT, PDF•
2 likes•1,824 views
This document provides guidance on how to effectively search for and evaluate information found online or elsewhere. It outlines key steps such as knowing what you're looking for, developing search strategies, using effective search techniques, and evaluating websites based on accuracy, authority, perspective, currency, and coverage. Search engines and general search tips are also discussed.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Evaluating Internet Sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating online sources for research. It instructs the reader to assess sources by considering how they were found, credentials, currency, objectivity, bias, and advertising. It differentiates between subjective and objective sources and emphasizes constructing a complete picture by considering multiple sources as pieces of a puzzle. Useful references for learning to evaluate sources are also provided.
Evaluating internet sites with info on how search engines work
This document provides guidance on evaluating internet sites for research purposes. It emphasizes checking a site for authority, objectivity/bias, content and accuracy, and currency. Key factors include examining the author's credentials, potential agenda, sourcing and documentation of information, and date of publication. Students should use authoritative sources like online encyclopedias whenever possible rather than potentially unreliable or biased personal websites.
Evaluating Internet Sources
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility and reliability of information found online. It outlines several steps and criteria to consider when assessing a website or web page, including analyzing the domain name and server information to determine the publisher; researching the author's qualifications and potential biases; evaluating the currency and documentation of the information; determining if multiple viewpoints are presented; and assessing the overall purpose and usefulness of the site. The goal is to develop skills for critically examining online information and determining what can validly be proven or concluded based on the source.
Evaluating Internet Sources RADAR Worksheet
The document provides guidelines for evaluating internet sources, including criteria for assessing the relevance, authority, date, appearance, and reason of a source. It introduces the RADAR worksheet as a tool to help rank these categories from 1-10 for a source and determine its overall quality and appropriateness for coursework based on the total score. Key questions are provided under each category to guide evaluation.
Evaluating internet sources
The document discusses how to evaluate information sources for reliability. It introduces CARRDS, a tool for evaluating credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, source, and scope/purpose of information. Questions are provided for each element of CARRDS to help determine if a source is trustworthy enough to be used. The document also discusses how to use domain suffixes to gauge the validity and potential bias of a source. Sources like .edu and .gov are generally reliable while .com may have built-in bias and .org could be biased towards the organization.
Evaluating Web Sources For Research
This document provides guidance for evaluating web sources for research by beginning MBA students. It outlines criteria for evaluating sources, including authority, accuracy, content, currency, and objectivity. For each criterion, it poses questions to consider and provides techniques for evaluating the source based on that criterion, such as looking for information about authors and publishers to judge authority, consulting additional sources to verify claims and check for errors when evaluating accuracy, and examining links and references for signs of bias or an agenda when analyzing objectivity. The document encourages using these criteria and techniques to make sense of excessive online information and develop critical thinking skills.
Evaluating Sources
This is a pretty dry PPT about evaluating sources but informational. It also has a group activity at the end of presentation.
Evaluating Your Sources
This document outlines five criteria for evaluating information sources: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains each criterion in detail. Accuracy involves checking the author's credentials and expertise. Authority means evaluating the author's qualifications. Objectivity is about determining any biases. Currency refers to considering how recently the information was published or updated. Coverage relates to how extensively the source discusses the topic. Asking questions about these five areas can help determine whether a source is reliable and suitable for a particular research need.
Recommended
Evaluating Internet Sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating online sources for research. It instructs the reader to assess sources by considering how they were found, credentials, currency, objectivity, bias, and advertising. It differentiates between subjective and objective sources and emphasizes constructing a complete picture by considering multiple sources as pieces of a puzzle. Useful references for learning to evaluate sources are also provided.
Evaluating internet sites with info on how search engines work
This document provides guidance on evaluating internet sites for research purposes. It emphasizes checking a site for authority, objectivity/bias, content and accuracy, and currency. Key factors include examining the author's credentials, potential agenda, sourcing and documentation of information, and date of publication. Students should use authoritative sources like online encyclopedias whenever possible rather than potentially unreliable or biased personal websites.
Evaluating Internet Sources
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility and reliability of information found online. It outlines several steps and criteria to consider when assessing a website or web page, including analyzing the domain name and server information to determine the publisher; researching the author's qualifications and potential biases; evaluating the currency and documentation of the information; determining if multiple viewpoints are presented; and assessing the overall purpose and usefulness of the site. The goal is to develop skills for critically examining online information and determining what can validly be proven or concluded based on the source.
Evaluating Internet Sources RADAR Worksheet
The document provides guidelines for evaluating internet sources, including criteria for assessing the relevance, authority, date, appearance, and reason of a source. It introduces the RADAR worksheet as a tool to help rank these categories from 1-10 for a source and determine its overall quality and appropriateness for coursework based on the total score. Key questions are provided under each category to guide evaluation.
Evaluating internet sources
The document discusses how to evaluate information sources for reliability. It introduces CARRDS, a tool for evaluating credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, source, and scope/purpose of information. Questions are provided for each element of CARRDS to help determine if a source is trustworthy enough to be used. The document also discusses how to use domain suffixes to gauge the validity and potential bias of a source. Sources like .edu and .gov are generally reliable while .com may have built-in bias and .org could be biased towards the organization.
Evaluating Web Sources For Research
This document provides guidance for evaluating web sources for research by beginning MBA students. It outlines criteria for evaluating sources, including authority, accuracy, content, currency, and objectivity. For each criterion, it poses questions to consider and provides techniques for evaluating the source based on that criterion, such as looking for information about authors and publishers to judge authority, consulting additional sources to verify claims and check for errors when evaluating accuracy, and examining links and references for signs of bias or an agenda when analyzing objectivity. The document encourages using these criteria and techniques to make sense of excessive online information and develop critical thinking skills.
Evaluating Sources
This is a pretty dry PPT about evaluating sources but informational. It also has a group activity at the end of presentation.
Evaluating Your Sources
This document outlines five criteria for evaluating information sources: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains each criterion in detail. Accuracy involves checking the author's credentials and expertise. Authority means evaluating the author's qualifications. Objectivity is about determining any biases. Currency refers to considering how recently the information was published or updated. Coverage relates to how extensively the source discusses the topic. Asking questions about these five areas can help determine whether a source is reliable and suitable for a particular research need.
Evaluating Sources
The document provides information about evaluating sources and the Mozart Effect. It includes two articles about the Mozart Effect - one from the University of California Irvine that discovered listening to Mozart does not significantly improve long-term cognitive skills, and one from Appalachian State University that also found no evidence that listening to Mozart temporarily improves spatial-temporal abilities. It discusses how to determine if information is reliable by considering the evidence, authority, and consensus. It outlines the CRAAP test for evaluating sources, which considers currency, reliability, authority, and purpose. It prompts evaluating two sources on these criteria and determining if Mozart CDs should be given to a nephew.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources for research by outlining eight criteria: authority, accuracy, content, relevance, objectivity, audience, writing style, and currency. For each criterion, questions are provided to determine if a source meets the standard of being relevant, useful, and accurate. Key advice includes not using a source if the author's authority cannot be verified or the information's accuracy is questionable. The intended audience and writing style should also fit the research topic and assignment.
Evaluating Information Sources
This document discusses criteria for evaluating information sources, including accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains questions to ask about each criterion, such as whether information is cited, who is responsible for the content, potential biases, publication dates, and scope. Website domains like .edu, .gov and .org are generally more reliable than .com, but all sources require evaluating based on these five criteria.
What the C.R.A.P.?
This document outlines the C.R.A.P. test for evaluating information sources. The C.R.A.P. test considers the currency, relevance, authority, and purpose of information. It discusses evaluating sources based on when they were published, how closely they relate to the topic, the credentials of the author, and the intention of the information whether to sell, entertain, inform, or persuade. The C.R.A.P. test provides a framework for critically analyzing sources and their suitability for research.
Engl1102-- Access Information-- Nagel
This document provides an overview of information literacy outcomes and strategies for conducting library research. It discusses defining an information need, efficiently accessing relevant information from books, articles, and online resources. It also covers evaluating information sources and next steps for critically evaluating and appropriately using information.
Engl1102 Fall12 Nagel
This document provides guidance on conducting library research and evaluating information sources. It outlines the key steps in developing an effective search strategy, including defining an information need, brainstorming search terms, and using Boolean logic. It also reviews common information sources like books, articles, and online resources. Finally, it discusses important criteria for evaluating the authority, currency, and content of information sources. The overall goal is to help students appropriately fulfill their information needs and assignments.
Craap on the internet
The document discusses the CRAAP test for evaluating the quality and reliability of internet sources. The CRAAP test stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It provides examples of applying the CRAAP test criteria to evaluate several websites on World War 2, some passing the test and others failing. Resources for further information on applying the CRAAP evaluation method are also listed.
Engl1101 Spring 2013-- Nagel
This document provides an overview of information literacy outcomes and skills related to searching for information, evaluating sources critically, and using information appropriately. It discusses developing effective search strategies using keywords, Boolean operators, and different search methods. Guidelines are provided for evaluating information sources based on authority, currency, content, and other criteria. The document also covers ethical use of information, such as avoiding plagiarism through proper citation and summarization.
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources. It introduces several models for evaluating sources, including the CRAAP test and the relevance/credibility model. The CRAAP test examines the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of a source. Additional factors discussed for evaluating sources include the author's qualifications, whether the information has been peer reviewed, potential biases, and accuracy. Students are encouraged to consider these criteria when evaluating both online and print sources for a research task or assignment. The document stresses the importance of carefully evaluating all sources, especially web-based materials, given the open nature of online information.
Eval websites
The document introduces the CRAAP test, which is a list of questions to help evaluate information found during searches. The CRAAP test criteria includes currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. Different criteria may be more important depending on the situation or need. The document then lists questions for each criteria to help determine the quality and reliability of information.
The Craap Test for evaluating resources
Submit your resources to the respected CRAAP test to determine whether you want to use them or not for your assignment.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources for use in answering questions on an online reference service. It outlines six criteria for evaluating sources: authority, currency, objectivity, coverage, accuracy/verifiability, and relevance. For each criterion, it provides examples and questions to consider to determine how well the source meets that standard of evaluation. The goal is to select sources that will provide high-quality, unbiased information to answer users' questions completely and appropriately.
Evaluating sources for credibility
This document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of sources for research. It defines key terms like research, source credibility, and validity. It then lists questions under five categories - who, what, when, where, why - to consider when assessing a source. These include examining the author's credentials, biases, purpose, evidence of updates, and relevance to the research task. The document concludes with warning signs of less credible sources like outdated information, errors, or ads/charges.
Choosing Credible Sources of Information
The document discusses how to choose credible sources of information for a project. It recommends using a variety of primary sources, such as images, videos, books, and news articles. The document cautions that some content may seem unbelievable and advises readers to consider whether the information seems exaggerated, can be verified through other sources, and is consistent with known facts. It suggests comparing multiple sources if claims seem far-fetched and using instincts to judge source credibility.
Evaluating sources
This presentation discusses how to teach students to evaluate sources effectively. It notes that students often rely on insufficient high school research strategies and don't know how to assess the value of information. The presentation recommends teaching students criteria to evaluate sources, including genre, currency, and bias. For genre, it suggests distinguishing academic from non-academic and primary from secondary sources. For currency, it discusses how conversations change over time and primary vs. secondary sources. For bias, it recommends teaching students to identify an author's level of personal interest through documentation, criticism, and previous publications. Worksheets and resources are provided to facilitate teaching these evaluation skills.
Evaluation of Information
This document provides guidance on evaluating different types of sources for research, including books, magazines, and websites. It outlines key criteria to consider for each source type, such as the author's expertise and potential biases, date of publication, accuracy of content, and whether the source is primary or secondary. For all source types, students are advised to critically examine the author's credentials and potential agenda, consider the reliability based on reviews or citations, and evaluate whether factual claims are supported and information is up-to-date. Web sources require additional scrutiny of authorship, hosting organization, and primary versus secondary nature of content. The document aims to help students distinguish high quality sources suitable for academic research.
Craap test chico
The CRAAP Test is a tool to help evaluate the quality and reliability of information found through research. It consists of five evaluation criteria: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. For each criteria, there are questions provided to analyze different aspects of the information source. For example, for Authority the questions consider who authored the content and their credentials, and for Accuracy it examines where the information comes from and whether evidence is cited. Applying the CRAAP Test criteria can help determine whether a source is trustworthy and suitable to use for research needs.
Finding Sources
This document provides tips for finding credible sources for essays. It recommends searching libraries, online databases, and the internet for sources like books, journals, newspapers, interviews and more. Sources are categorized as either primary, being original sources, or secondary, being analyses of primary sources. When evaluating sources, consider factors like currency, reliability, authority, and purpose/point of view, as outlined in the C.R.A.P. test. Credible sources include scholarly books and journals from libraries and databases, while sources like personal blogs and commercial websites may be less reliable due to potential biases.
Finding and Evaluating Sources
This document outlines information literacy sessions for English courses at NMC. It discusses evaluating sources, conducting research, and challenges NMC students face. The sessions are designed to help students learn skills like identifying source types, searching databases, evaluating credibility, and understanding scholarly peer review. Students will practice source evaluation and learn search strategies beyond Google. The goal is to improve students' research abilities and prepare them for college-level work.
Evaluating information on the web
A basic presentation for evaluating resources on the web and what are search engines, directories and meta search engines
Finding credible sources
The document discusses finding credible sources for research. It emphasizes that using multiple perspectives from a variety of reliable sources helps develop a well-rounded argument. Primary sources are original works, while secondary sources analyze or discuss primary sources. The document cautions against solely using Google, Wikipedia, or top search results, as these may not always be trustworthy. It provides tips for evaluating websites like checking the author's credentials, date of publication, and presence of biases. Databases through the school are presented as a better option than open web searches, as they only contain vetted, credible sources.
Evaluating Web Resources
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability and credibility of information found on websites. It discusses looking at the source of the information, including the author's credentials and expertise, as well as the type of organization responsible for the website. It also discusses considering the purpose and potential bias of the website by examining its intended audience and agenda. Finally, it discusses evaluating the accuracy and currency of the website's content by looking for citations, references, and dates. Checklists and additional resources for evaluating websites are also provided.
More Related Content
What's hot
Evaluating Sources
The document provides information about evaluating sources and the Mozart Effect. It includes two articles about the Mozart Effect - one from the University of California Irvine that discovered listening to Mozart does not significantly improve long-term cognitive skills, and one from Appalachian State University that also found no evidence that listening to Mozart temporarily improves spatial-temporal abilities. It discusses how to determine if information is reliable by considering the evidence, authority, and consensus. It outlines the CRAAP test for evaluating sources, which considers currency, reliability, authority, and purpose. It prompts evaluating two sources on these criteria and determining if Mozart CDs should be given to a nephew.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources for research by outlining eight criteria: authority, accuracy, content, relevance, objectivity, audience, writing style, and currency. For each criterion, questions are provided to determine if a source meets the standard of being relevant, useful, and accurate. Key advice includes not using a source if the author's authority cannot be verified or the information's accuracy is questionable. The intended audience and writing style should also fit the research topic and assignment.
Evaluating Information Sources
This document discusses criteria for evaluating information sources, including accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains questions to ask about each criterion, such as whether information is cited, who is responsible for the content, potential biases, publication dates, and scope. Website domains like .edu, .gov and .org are generally more reliable than .com, but all sources require evaluating based on these five criteria.
What the C.R.A.P.?
This document outlines the C.R.A.P. test for evaluating information sources. The C.R.A.P. test considers the currency, relevance, authority, and purpose of information. It discusses evaluating sources based on when they were published, how closely they relate to the topic, the credentials of the author, and the intention of the information whether to sell, entertain, inform, or persuade. The C.R.A.P. test provides a framework for critically analyzing sources and their suitability for research.
Engl1102-- Access Information-- Nagel
This document provides an overview of information literacy outcomes and strategies for conducting library research. It discusses defining an information need, efficiently accessing relevant information from books, articles, and online resources. It also covers evaluating information sources and next steps for critically evaluating and appropriately using information.
Engl1102 Fall12 Nagel
This document provides guidance on conducting library research and evaluating information sources. It outlines the key steps in developing an effective search strategy, including defining an information need, brainstorming search terms, and using Boolean logic. It also reviews common information sources like books, articles, and online resources. Finally, it discusses important criteria for evaluating the authority, currency, and content of information sources. The overall goal is to help students appropriately fulfill their information needs and assignments.
Craap on the internet
The document discusses the CRAAP test for evaluating the quality and reliability of internet sources. The CRAAP test stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It provides examples of applying the CRAAP test criteria to evaluate several websites on World War 2, some passing the test and others failing. Resources for further information on applying the CRAAP evaluation method are also listed.
Engl1101 Spring 2013-- Nagel
This document provides an overview of information literacy outcomes and skills related to searching for information, evaluating sources critically, and using information appropriately. It discusses developing effective search strategies using keywords, Boolean operators, and different search methods. Guidelines are provided for evaluating information sources based on authority, currency, content, and other criteria. The document also covers ethical use of information, such as avoiding plagiarism through proper citation and summarization.
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources. It introduces several models for evaluating sources, including the CRAAP test and the relevance/credibility model. The CRAAP test examines the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of a source. Additional factors discussed for evaluating sources include the author's qualifications, whether the information has been peer reviewed, potential biases, and accuracy. Students are encouraged to consider these criteria when evaluating both online and print sources for a research task or assignment. The document stresses the importance of carefully evaluating all sources, especially web-based materials, given the open nature of online information.
Eval websites
The document introduces the CRAAP test, which is a list of questions to help evaluate information found during searches. The CRAAP test criteria includes currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. Different criteria may be more important depending on the situation or need. The document then lists questions for each criteria to help determine the quality and reliability of information.
The Craap Test for evaluating resources
Submit your resources to the respected CRAAP test to determine whether you want to use them or not for your assignment.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources for use in answering questions on an online reference service. It outlines six criteria for evaluating sources: authority, currency, objectivity, coverage, accuracy/verifiability, and relevance. For each criterion, it provides examples and questions to consider to determine how well the source meets that standard of evaluation. The goal is to select sources that will provide high-quality, unbiased information to answer users' questions completely and appropriately.
Evaluating sources for credibility
This document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of sources for research. It defines key terms like research, source credibility, and validity. It then lists questions under five categories - who, what, when, where, why - to consider when assessing a source. These include examining the author's credentials, biases, purpose, evidence of updates, and relevance to the research task. The document concludes with warning signs of less credible sources like outdated information, errors, or ads/charges.
Choosing Credible Sources of Information
The document discusses how to choose credible sources of information for a project. It recommends using a variety of primary sources, such as images, videos, books, and news articles. The document cautions that some content may seem unbelievable and advises readers to consider whether the information seems exaggerated, can be verified through other sources, and is consistent with known facts. It suggests comparing multiple sources if claims seem far-fetched and using instincts to judge source credibility.
Evaluating sources
This presentation discusses how to teach students to evaluate sources effectively. It notes that students often rely on insufficient high school research strategies and don't know how to assess the value of information. The presentation recommends teaching students criteria to evaluate sources, including genre, currency, and bias. For genre, it suggests distinguishing academic from non-academic and primary from secondary sources. For currency, it discusses how conversations change over time and primary vs. secondary sources. For bias, it recommends teaching students to identify an author's level of personal interest through documentation, criticism, and previous publications. Worksheets and resources are provided to facilitate teaching these evaluation skills.
Evaluation of Information
This document provides guidance on evaluating different types of sources for research, including books, magazines, and websites. It outlines key criteria to consider for each source type, such as the author's expertise and potential biases, date of publication, accuracy of content, and whether the source is primary or secondary. For all source types, students are advised to critically examine the author's credentials and potential agenda, consider the reliability based on reviews or citations, and evaluate whether factual claims are supported and information is up-to-date. Web sources require additional scrutiny of authorship, hosting organization, and primary versus secondary nature of content. The document aims to help students distinguish high quality sources suitable for academic research.
Craap test chico
The CRAAP Test is a tool to help evaluate the quality and reliability of information found through research. It consists of five evaluation criteria: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. For each criteria, there are questions provided to analyze different aspects of the information source. For example, for Authority the questions consider who authored the content and their credentials, and for Accuracy it examines where the information comes from and whether evidence is cited. Applying the CRAAP Test criteria can help determine whether a source is trustworthy and suitable to use for research needs.
Finding Sources
This document provides tips for finding credible sources for essays. It recommends searching libraries, online databases, and the internet for sources like books, journals, newspapers, interviews and more. Sources are categorized as either primary, being original sources, or secondary, being analyses of primary sources. When evaluating sources, consider factors like currency, reliability, authority, and purpose/point of view, as outlined in the C.R.A.P. test. Credible sources include scholarly books and journals from libraries and databases, while sources like personal blogs and commercial websites may be less reliable due to potential biases.
Finding and Evaluating Sources
This document outlines information literacy sessions for English courses at NMC. It discusses evaluating sources, conducting research, and challenges NMC students face. The sessions are designed to help students learn skills like identifying source types, searching databases, evaluating credibility, and understanding scholarly peer review. Students will practice source evaluation and learn search strategies beyond Google. The goal is to improve students' research abilities and prepare them for college-level work.
Evaluating information on the web
A basic presentation for evaluating resources on the web and what are search engines, directories and meta search engines
What's hot (20)
Similar to Information Literacy: Finding Information
Finding credible sources
The document discusses finding credible sources for research. It emphasizes that using multiple perspectives from a variety of reliable sources helps develop a well-rounded argument. Primary sources are original works, while secondary sources analyze or discuss primary sources. The document cautions against solely using Google, Wikipedia, or top search results, as these may not always be trustworthy. It provides tips for evaluating websites like checking the author's credentials, date of publication, and presence of biases. Databases through the school are presented as a better option than open web searches, as they only contain vetted, credible sources.
Evaluating Web Resources
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability and credibility of information found on websites. It discusses looking at the source of the information, including the author's credentials and expertise, as well as the type of organization responsible for the website. It also discusses considering the purpose and potential bias of the website by examining its intended audience and agenda. Finally, it discusses evaluating the accuracy and currency of the website's content by looking for citations, references, and dates. Checklists and additional resources for evaluating websites are also provided.
G N E D Web
Web resources can provide up-to-date information quickly and conveniently. However, anyone can publish anything online without verification. Evaluating web resources carefully is important because accuracy is not guaranteed. Key factors to consider include the content, authority and viewpoint of the source, proximity of the source to events, and overall accuracy and timeliness of the information provided.
Ron E. Lewis Library Thinking Critically about Web I.docx
This document provides guidance on using the CRAAP test to evaluate information found on the web. The CRAAP test consists of 5 criteria to score sources on a scale of 0 to 3: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. For each criteria, descriptions are given for scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 to determine if a source is very questionable, OK for information but don't cite, good to use and cite, or excellent to use and cite. Applying this test helps determine if a web source is credible and reliable or just opinions without evidence.
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part I
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part IOffice of Instructional Development at Dawson College
This document provides an overview of applying new technologies in education with a hands-on approach. It discusses key concepts related to the internet, World Wide Web 1.0 and 2.0, evaluating online resources, using tools like Google Maps, and sharing information through services such as Google Docs, Flickr, YouTube, and Dropbox. The document is intended to be covered over two sessions on January 14th and February 4th that will allow participants to gain experience using these technologies in a classroom setting.Research Presentation
The document provides information on evaluating sources found on the internet. It discusses how Wikipedia may not be a reliable academic source due to lack of editorial oversight. It also discusses how to determine the authority, objectivity, currency and coverage of a website to evaluate if it is a good source. The document provides examples of citation styles and discusses avoiding plagiarism by properly citing sources.
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Online Research
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider in determining whether a site meets that standard, such as checking for author credentials, obvious mistakes, biased or inflammatory language, dated content, and usability of navigation. The document advises using search engines like Google to investigate authors and sponsors when information is missing from sites, and provides additional tips for effective online research.
Website_Criteria_Chart.pdf
This document outlines the ABCD method for evaluating websites for research: Authority, Bias, Currency, and Documentation. For authority, it recommends checking the author's credentials and expertise. For bias, it suggests determining if the information is balanced or intended to sway opinion. For currency, it advises verifying when the page was last updated and if facts are up to date. For documentation, it notes that websites rarely have editors and to check sources for facts, references, and statistics. The ABCD method helps assess a site's trustworthiness and relevance for research.
Evaluating Websites
Students need help learning that just because it came from Google doesn't make it factual. This is a powerpoint lesson that reviews how to evaluate a website. It is used in conjunction with live examples, Nettrekker, and a rubric activity for evaluating websites.
Evaluating Sources' Reliability
This document discusses how to evaluate sources for reliability when conducting research. It identifies several factors to consider, including usefulness, credibility, bias, currency, reliability, authority, purpose/point of view, and potential red flags. Specifically, it advises evaluating an author's credentials, date of publication, accuracy/corroboration, presence of bias or conflicts of interest, as well as cues from URLs, when assessing source credibility. Choosing sources directly relevant to your topic and purpose is also important.
Evaluating Sources' Credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate sources for reliability when conducting research. It identifies several factors to consider, including usefulness, credibility, bias, currency, reliability, authority, purpose/point of view, and potential red flags. Usefulness considers how the source fits your research topic and purpose. Credibility examines the author's credentials, publisher reputation, date of publication, accuracy, and citations. Bias considers any slant or agenda in the content. Red flags include anonymity, poor writing, and lack of evidence or corroboration. Careful evaluation of sources is essential for quality research.
Modulo Instruccional Internet Ppt
This tutorial provides students with an introduction to evaluating information found on the internet. It defines key concepts related to searching the web, such as search engines, keywords, Boolean operators and domain extensions. The document emphasizes important criteria for evaluating web information, including assessing the purpose and authority of a site, identifying when information was published, and determining if content is objective or supported by references. Students are encouraged to consider these factors to evaluate whether web information is reliable and suitable for their research needs.
How to search and justify scholarly resources?
This document provides information on how to effectively search for and evaluate online resources. It discusses the variety of sources where information can be found, including websites, journals, books, videos and more. It explains what search engines and metasearch engines are and provides examples. Boolean operators that can be used to refine searches, such as AND, OR and NOT, are outlined. Tips are provided on how to evaluate sources based on their authority, bias, content, date and other factors. The differences between popular and scholarly resources are compared. Strategies for determining the authenticity of websites are described.
research.pptx
This document discusses biases and prejudices. It defines bias as favoring or opposing something in an unfair manner due to personal opinions. Some common types of biases discussed include anchoring bias, media bias, confirmation bias, conformity bias, and the halo effect. Prejudice is defined as pre-judging without evidence. Common types of prejudices mentioned are racism, sexism, classism, ageism, and religious prejudice. The document provides tips for online searching, evaluating source credibility, and skills for skimming and scanning texts like combining search terms with modifiers and identifying reliable sources. It includes an assignment that asks the reader to apply these research skills to gather sources about specific topics.
Information Literacy Session 5
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability and credibility of information found online or in publications. It discusses evaluating the authority of authors, publishers, and sponsors; the currency of information; and signs of biased content. Key factors for evaluating information include the author's expertise, the publisher/sponsor and their reputation, the date of publication, whether claims are supported by facts, and if information is presented objectively and in full context.
Do you believe everything you find on the internet
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability and credibility of information found on websites. It suggests considering factors such as the source and author's credentials, whether the information is accurate and up-to-date, potential biases, and issues like dead links or outdated content. Evaluating websites requires bearing in mind questions about the information provider, accuracy, authority on the topic, coverage of the issue, currency of the content, and potential biases to assess whether the information can be trusted.
Using Technology for Academic Research
This document provides guidance on evaluating electronic information sources for research. It discusses formulating a research question and where to find answers, such as books, academic journals, newspapers, magazines and the internet. It outlines criteria for evaluating sources, such as checking the author and publisher, assessing the purpose and reliability of the information. It also discusses using search techniques like Boolean operators and quotation marks to refine searches. Domain name extensions like .edu and .gov are explained to determine the type of website. Steps of the research process, including developing search strategies and assessing source quality, are also outlined.
Locating sources review presentation
The document provides tips for locating and evaluating credible sources for research. It discusses evaluating print resources by considering the author's background and credentials. For internet sources, the document notes that anyone can post information online and advises being cautious and using evaluative skills. It provides tips for effectively using search engines and evaluating internet sources by considering the authorship, credibility, purpose, timeliness, and correlation with other research. Students are advised to carefully evaluate sources before using them.
Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses how the internet has changed research and that not all online information is accurate. It then outlines five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each of these criteria in detail and provides examples to illustrate how to apply them when assessing the reliability of information on a given website. The overall message is that students need to carefully evaluate websites using these standards to determine their value for research.
Similar to Information Literacy: Finding Information (20)
Ron E. Lewis Library Thinking Critically about Web I.docx
Ron E. Lewis Library Thinking Critically about Web I.docx
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part I
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part I
Do you believe everything you find on the internet
Do you believe everything you find on the internet
More from Lenva Shearing
Assessment
This document discusses assessment and its role in the learning process. It emphasizes that assessment should primarily be formative and focus on supporting student learning. Effective assessment provides clarity for students by setting clear learning intentions and success criteria. Teachers need skills like using a variety of assessment methods, analyzing data, and involving students in the assessment process through self-assessment and peer assessment. The goal is to help students understand their own progress and set new learning goals.
Writing pilot programme
The document discusses strategies for vocabulary extension and writing exercises used in a classroom. It describes using games like Bridges and Combinations to teach vocabulary in an engaging way. Other strategies mentioned include weekly spelling rules, word study focusing on topic-specific words, and having students write short snippets or passages daily using story starters or pictures to build confidence in writing. The goal is to make vocabulary learning and writing more authentic, meaningful and fun for students through varied exercises done in short bursts.
12 in 120 - A potpuri of little known Web 2.0 Tools
The document lists and describes various free web 2.0 tools that can be used in the classroom for activities such as collaboration, presentation, storytelling, and more. Some of the tools highlighted include wikis, Google apps, Screentoaster for screencasting, Etherpad for collaborative writing, Fotoflexer for image manipulation, Weebly for creating websites, Prezi for online presentations, and Animoto for making videos from images and music. Many of the tools allow embedding content, audio/video recording, image inclusion, and sharing of files for collaboration. Suggested classroom uses include brainstorming, reflections, digital storytelling, and presenting findings.
Persona powerpoint
The document summarizes popular culture in the 1910s decade. It provides lists of top boys and girls names, popular foods like canned soup and Oreos, and entertainment genres including movies, music, and dance styles like the tango. Sports and pastimes such as toys, games, and Raggedy Anne dolls are mentioned. The document also briefly outlines World War 1, the Spanish influenza pandemic, and technological advances in transportation, communication, household appliances, and everyday life during the 1910s decade.
Andy warhol slideshow
Andy Warhol was one of the most famous 20th century artists known for his pop art images of famous people and consumer goods. He moved to New York and founded The Factory art studio where he produced films, magazines, and art that redefined modern art. Though soft spoken, his unique artistic style and personality influenced visual culture.
Digital citizenship ss
1. The document discusses digital citizenship and outlines guidelines for students, teachers, parents, and school management regarding acceptable and responsible use of technology.
2. Key guidelines for students include publishing digital work while protecting privacy, managing online identity, avoiding plagiarism, following procedures to stay safe online, and addressing cyberbullying.
3. Teachers are advised to model safe technology use, teach digital citizenship lessons, monitor student online activities, and establish classroom practices. School management should implement general policies around passwords, filters, equity and access, and addressing abuse or misuse.
E asttle
e-asTTle is an assessment tool that challenges traditional testing approaches. It aims to assess students based on their ability rather than age. Tests can be taken online or on paper. Questions adapt based on the student's responses to determine their ability level. The goal is to identify what students know and don't know to inform future learning, rather than solely providing a score. Results reports also analyze incorrect answers to guide next steps.
Southern Steel Presentation
The Southern Steel is a netball team formed in 2007 from the merger of the Otago Rebels and Southern Sting. Based in Southland, the 12-player team is coached by Robyn Broughton and her assistants. In their first season in the ANZ Championship in 2009, the Steel finished 4th, demonstrating the team and individual attributes of communication, determination, and commitment that make them successful. They are supported by numerous local sponsors.
Southern Steel
The Southern Steel is a netball team formed in 2007 from the merger of the Otago Rebels and Southern Sting. Based in Southland, the 12-player team is coached by Robyn Broughton and her assistants. In their debut season in the ANZ Championship in 2009, the Steel finished 4th, demonstrating the team and individual attributes of communication, determination, and commitment that make them successful. They are supported by numerous local sponsors.
Are tests the best way to see if
This document summarizes a student's research project investigating whether tests are the best way to determine if someone has improved in a subject. The student conducted a survey of 8 people ages 10-12, with 4 of each gender. Most respondents said tests were not the best measure, as mood and nerves can impact test performance. The student concludes that tests may not be necessary and alternatives should be considered.
Seal inquiry
Harp seals have several adaptations that help them survive in their icy environment and catch prey. They have claws and teeth to hunt fish and defend against predators like orcas and polar bears. Their flippers, blubber, and ability to reduce heat loss through their skin allow them to swim efficiently and stay warm in cold water. Harp seal pups have a white coat that camouflages them from predators until they are older.
Daisypopculturepowerpointdoc4
The document summarizes various aspects of pop culture in the 1960s, including music, food, toys/games, fashion, transport, technology, social influences, history, and the economy. Some of the most popular bands of the 1960s included The Beatles, Rolling Stones, and Bob Dylan. Food was simpler but tasty, featuring items like carrot sticks and chocolate cake. Popular toys included Twister, Clue, and Barbie. Fashions included miniskirts for women and suits for men. Technology included transistor radios and cassette recorders. John F. Kennedy was president during this time period and Martin Luther King Jr. gave his iconic "I Have a Dream" speech.
Eportfolios - A Learning Space
The document discusses the importance of students understanding what they are learning and how it can be applied. It also suggests schools explore how information and communication technology (ICT) can supplement and enhance traditional teaching methods by opening up new ways of learning. Students will need 21st century skills to be lifelong learners, including skills like collaboration, creativity, and digital literacy. Electronic portfolios can help students collect and reflect on their work, progress, and achievements over time in a way that involves others and uses multimedia formats.
Aditya Owns A Microwave #3 F
The document is a presentation by Aditya about the history and development of the microwave oven. It traces the invention of the microwave oven from its accidental discovery by Percy Spencer in the 1940s to modern microwave ovens. The presentation includes slides on the inventor Percy Spencer, how the idea was developed, the benefits and drawbacks of microwave ovens over time, and how microwave ovens have impacted people's lives.
Mauis Dolphin
The document is a slideshow presentation about the endangered Māui's dolphin. It provides background information on the dolphin, including that it was previously known as the North Island Hector's dolphin. Facts about the dolphin's attributes, behavior, habitat in New Zealand, breeding, food, and threats are outlined. The main threats are slow breeding rate, small population size, and deaths caused by humans through boat strikes and fishing nets. The government is taking action to help protect the dolphin by banning certain fishing nets in its habitat.
Photography
The document provides tips for taking great photos. It recommends reading the camera manual to understand buttons and modes. Select a theme and tell a story with related photos. Consider lighting, composition using rules of thirds, and framing the subject with an uncluttered background. Use a tripod for stability. Be creative with angles, perspectives, and cropping photos. Review photos and practice the techniques.
Amazing Maths Trick
This document provides several math tricks and puzzles that involve multiplying, squaring, or otherwise manipulating numbers in surprising ways. The tricks are explained step-by-step and include multiplying any two-digit number by 11, squaring two-digit numbers ending in 5 or beginning with 5, and multiplying by 9 using your fingers. Practice is recommended to master the tricks.
Pedagogy and ICT
This document discusses the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in education. It notes that ICT enhances learning and teaching by developing understanding, extending access to information, and enhancing inquiry, development of ideas, and communication of ideas. ICT can be used to support, enhance, and extend teaching and learning. Using ICT is said to increase reasoning, problem solving, learning skills, creativity, attention, and cooperation between teachers and students. The document also discusses how ICT allows students to be collaborators and creators rather than just recipients of information.
Inquiry in the Middle School
This document outlines the key elements and process of an inquiry-based learning unit. It discusses establishing a big concept and essential questions at the beginning. It then describes brainstorming, research, developing hypotheses, investigating through notetaking and analysis. Students revisit their hypotheses, share their new knowledge, and reflect on their learning. The final questions prompt reflection on making the unit authentic and challenging for students, and allowing for choice, reflection and continual learning.
Inquiry Learning
The document discusses inquiry learning at BBI. It defines inquiry learning as an approach where students explore the world by asking questions, making discoveries, and rigorously testing those discoveries to build new understanding. Inquiry learning develops skills like critical thinking, collaboration, and problem solving. It allows students to direct their own learning by engaging with meaningful problems. The document outlines skills and approaches important for students to develop, including reasoning, communication, research skills, and developing 21st century skills through inquiry projects. Effective inquiry learning requires structure from teachers to support students.
More from Lenva Shearing (20)
12 in 120 - A potpuri of little known Web 2.0 Tools
12 in 120 - A potpuri of little known Web 2.0 Tools
Recently uploaded
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcHow to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Advanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
DRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
Recently uploaded (20)
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Information Literacy: Finding Information
- 4. Knowing Where to Look Books, encyclopedias, documentaries, www. Background information www, books, people, magazine articles, documentaries Comprehensive information Newspapers, www, journals, people, tv, radio Current, up to date Possible Sources Type of information