SlideShare a Scribd company logo
IMPACT TESTING
INTRODUCTION
• A simple tensile test does not reveal the brittle nature of the metals, and if only the tensile
test data are relied upon and the object is put into use, failure is certain.
• It is, therefore, necessary to test the material under shock or sudden loading conditions.
• The components like locomotive connecting rods, wheels etc., are subjected to impact(shock)
loads.These loads are applied suddenly.
• An impact test is used to observe the mechanics that a material will exhibit when it
experiences a shock loading that causes the specimen to immediately deform, fracture or
rupture completely.
• Notched-bar impact tests are subject to considerable scatter, particularly in the region of the
transition temperature. Most of this scatter is due to local variations in the properties of the
steel, while some is due to difficulties in preparing perfectly reproducible notches.
• Both notch shape and depth are critical variables, as is the proper placement of the specimen
in the impact machine.
Types of impact tests:
• For a single impact test the three most popular types of test are
1) the CharpyV-notch test,
2) the Izod test and
3) theTensile Impact test.
• These three tests all essentially determine the same characteristics of the
material but differ in the orientation of the test sample which causes the sample
to be stressed in different directions and involve a known weight released from
a known height colliding with the specimen in its test fixture. All of these tests
are useful in determining the impact mechanics of the test specimen.
SIGNIFICANCE OF NOTCHED-BAR IMPACT TESTING
NOTCH BEHAVIOUR:
• The notch behavior of the face-centered cubic metals and alloys, a large group of nonferrous
materials and the austenitic steels can be judged from their common tensile properties. If
they are brittle in tension, they will be brittle when notched, while if they are ductile in tension
they will be ductile when notched, except for unusually sharp or deep notches (much more
severe than the standard Charpy or Izod specimens). Even low temperatures do not alter this
characteristic of these materials.
• In contrast, the behavior of the ferritic steels under notch conditions cannot be predicted
from their properties as revealed by the tension test. For the study of these materials the
Charpy and Izod type tests are accordingly very useful. Some metals that display normal
ductility in the tension test may nevertheless break in brittle fashion when tested or when
used in the notched condition. Notched conditions include constraints to deformation in
directions perpendicular to the major stress, or multi axial stresses, and stress.
NOTCH EFFECT:
• The notch results in a combination of multi axial stresses associated with restraints to
deformation in directions perpendicular to the major stress, and a stress concentration at the
base of the notch.
• A severely notched condition is generally not desirable, and it becomes of real concern in
those cases in which it initiates a sudden and complete failure of the brittle type.
• Some metals can be deformed in a ductile manner even down to very low temperatures, while
others may crack. This difference in behavior can be best understood by considering the
cohesive strength of a material (or the property that holds it together) and its relation to the
yield point.
• In cases of brittle fracture, the cohesive strength is exceeded before significant plastic
deformation occurs and the fracture appears crystalline.
• In cases of the ductile or shear type of failure, considerable deformation precedes the final
fracture and the broken surface appears fibrous instead of crystalline.
• In intermediate cases, the fracture comes after a moderate amount of deformation and is part
crystalline and part fibrous in appearance.
CHARPY IMPACT TEST
• Charpy impact testing is a low-cost and reliable test method which is commonly required by the
construction codes for fracture-critical structures such as bridges and pressure vessels.
• It took from about 1900 to 1960 for impact-test technology and procedures to reach levels of accuracy and
reproducibility such that the procedures could be broadly applied as standard test methods.
• The Charpy impact test, also known as the Charpy V-notch test, is a high strain-rate test that involves
striking a standard notched specimen with a controlled weight pendulum swung from a set height. The
impact test helps measure the amount of energy absorbed by the specimen during fracture.
• Charpy tests show whether a metal can be classified as being either brittle or ductile. This is particularly
useful for ferritic steels that show a ductile to brittle transition with decreasing temperature. A brittle metal
will absorb a small amount of energy when impact tested, a tough ductile metal absorbs a large amount of
energy.
• The appearance of a fracture surface also gives information about the type of fracture that has occurred; a
brittle fracture is bright and crystalline, a ductile fracture is dull and fibrous. The percentage crystallinity is
determined by making a judgement of the amount of crystalline or brittle fracture on the surface of the
broken specimen, and is a measure of the amount of brittle fracture.
• Lateral expansion is a measure of the ductility of the specimen. When a ductile metal is broken, the test-
piece deforms before breaking, and material is squeezed out on the sides of the compression face. The
amount by which the specimen deforms in this way is measured and expressed as millimetres of lateral
expansion.
• The British Standard for Charpy testing is BS EN ISO 148-1:2009 and the American Standard is ASTM E23.
• The ASTM E23 Charpy testing standard uses a 2-2.5mm radius striker whereas BS ISO EN
148-1 can use either a 2mm or 8mm striker.
• Consequently, for materials with a high Charpy energy (above approx. 100J), more energy
will be absorbed by the 8mm striker than by the 2mm striker equivalent and tests carried out
using the 8mm striker will report higher impact energy.
• To carry out the test the standard specimen is supported at its two ends on an anvil and
struck on the opposite face to the notch by a pendulum .The specimen is fractured and the
pendulum swings through, the height of the swing being a measure of the amount of energy
absorbed in fracturing the specimen. Conventionally three specimens are tested at any one
temperature, and the results averaged.
• When reporting the results of a Charpy test, the absorbed energy (in Joules) is always
reported, while the percentage crystallinity and lateral expansion are optional on the test
report.
• It should be emphasised that Charpy tests are qualitative, the results can only be compared
with each other or with a requirement in a specification - they cannot be used to calculate the
fracture toughness of a metal.
TEST SPECIMEN OF CHARPY IMPACT TEST:
• The standard Charpy-V notch
specimen is 55mm long, 10mm square
and has a 2mm deep notch with a tip
radius of 0.25mm machined on one
face.
• The notch shall be carefully prepared so
that the root radius of the notch is free
of machining marks which could affect
the absorbed energy.
• The plane of symmetry of the notch
shall be perpendicular to the
longitudinal axis of the test piece.
• The specimens shown in Fig.1 are those
most widely used and most generally
satisfactory.They are particularly
suitable for ferrous metals, excepting
cast iron.
Pendulums used on Charpy
machines are of three basic
designs.They are:
a) C-type Pendulum
b) Compound Pendulum
c) U-type Pendulum
• A weighted pendulum, which is held
at some height h from the sample,
swings and impacts the sample at a
very high strain rate. The pendulum
then continues to swing until
reaching a final height of h′. The
difference between the potential
energies at height h and h′ is
considering to be the energy that
the sample absorbed upon impact.
Energy absorbed=mg(h-h’)
where;
m=mass of stricker hammer,
g=acceleration due to gravity
=9.8m/s2
Charpy testing machine
Test specimens after impact
test
Direction of impact load on the specimen
in CharpyV-notch and Izod impact test
1)The absorbed energy shall be taken as the difference between the energy in the striking member at the instant of
impact with the specimen and the energy remaining after breaking the specimen.This value is determined by the
machine’s scale reading which has been corrected for windage and friction losses.
2)Lateral expansion:
A measure of the ability of the material to resist fracture when subjected to triaxial stresses, such as those at the
root of the notch in a Charpy test piece, is the amount of deformation that occurs at this location.The deformation
in this case is contraction. Because of the difficulties in measuring this deformation, even after fracture, the
expansion that occurs at the opposite end of the fracture plane is customarily measured and used as a proxy for the
contraction.
3)Fracture appearance:
The fracture surface of Charpy test pieces is often rated by the percentage of shear fracture which occurs. The
greater the percentage of shear fracture, the greater the notch toughness of the material. The fracture surface of
most Charpy specimens exhibits a mixture of shear and flat fracture regions. The shear regions are assumed to be
fully ductile, but the flat fracture regions can be ductile, brittle, or a combination of these fracture modes. Because
the rating is extremely subjective, it is recommended that it is not to be used in specifications.
NOTE: The term fibrous-fracture appearance is often used as a synonym for shear fracture appearance. The terms
cleavage fracture appearance and crystallinity are often used to express the opposite of shear fracture.
Information Obtainable from Impact Tests
Schematic Charpy-V energy and percentage crystallinity
curves
SIGNIFICANCEOFTRANSITION-
TEMPERATURECURVE:
The chief engineering use of the
Charpy test is in selecting materials
which are resistant to brittle fracture
by means of transition-temperature
curves.The design philosophy is to
select a material which has sufficient
notch toughness when subjected to
severe service conditions so that the
load-carrying ability of the structural
member can be calculated by standard
strength of materials methods without
considering the fracture properties of
the material or stress concentration
effects of cracks or flaws.
ADVANTAGES OF IMPACT TESTING
• The principal advantages of the Charpy V-notch impact test is that it is a relatively
simple test that utilizes a relatively cheap, small test specimen.
• Tests can readily be carried out over a range of subambient temperatures.
• Moreover, the design of the test specimen is well suited for measuring differences in
notch toughness in low-strength materials such as structural steels.
• The test is used for comparing the influence of alloy studies and heat treatment on
notch toughness.
• It is frequently used for quality control and material acceptance purposes.
LIMITATIONS OF IMPACT TESTING
• These test methods do not address the problems associated with impact testing at
temperatures below –196 °C (–320 °F, 77 K).
• The results of the tests obtained are difficult to use in design.
• Since there is no measurement in terms of stress level, it is difficult to correlate CV (the
energy required for fracture of a Charpy specimen) data with service performance.
• Moreover, there is no correlation of Charpy data with flaw size.
• In addition, the large scatter inherent in the test may make it difficult to determine
well-defined transition-temperature curves.
• The chief deficiency of the Charpy impact test is that the small specimen is not always a
realistic model of the actual situation. Not only does the small specimen lead to
considerable scatter, but a specimen with a thickness of 10 mm cannot provide the
same constraint as would be found in a structure with a much greater thickness.
IZOD IMPACT TEST
• The Izod test has become the standard testing procedure for comparing the impact
resistances of plastics. While being the standard for plastics, it is also used on other materials.
• The Izod test is most commonly used to evaluate the relative toughness or impact toughness
of materials and as such is often used in quality control applications where it is a fast and
economical test. It is used more as a comparative test rather than a definitive test. This is also
in part due to the fact that the values do not relate accurately to the impact strength of
moulded parts or actual components under actual operational conditions.
• The Izod test involves striking a suitable test piece with a striker, mounted at the end of a
pendulum. The test piece is clamped vertically with the notch facing the striker. The striker
swings downwards impacting the test piece at the bottom of its swing.
Schematic diagram of Izod impact test
• The standard test piece of overall
length of 75mm and a square cross-
section of 10mm side with a standard
45° notch, 2mm deep is employed for
the test.The notch is at 28mm from
one end.
• The notch shall be carefully prepared
so that the root radius of the notch is
free of machining marks which could
affect the absorbed energy.
• The plane of symmetry of the notch
shall be perpendicular to the
longitudinal axis of the test piece.
• The specimen shown in Fig.2 is the
most widely used and most generally
satisfactory. It is particularly suitable
for ferrous metals, excepting cast iron.
TEST SPECIMEN OF IZOD IMPACT TEST:
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Lec 2 compression test
Lec 2 compression  testLec 2 compression  test
Lec 2 compression test
Rania Atia
 
12 fatigue of metals
12 fatigue of metals12 fatigue of metals
12 fatigue of metalsRajeev Ranjan
 
Mechanical Testing : Testing Of Materials
Mechanical Testing : Testing Of MaterialsMechanical Testing : Testing Of Materials
Mechanical Testing : Testing Of Materials
Dr.S.Thirumalvalavan
 
01 introduction to_mechanical_metallurgy
01 introduction to_mechanical_metallurgy01 introduction to_mechanical_metallurgy
01 introduction to_mechanical_metallurgyjojim1980
 
Destructive test
Destructive testDestructive test
Destructive test
Antonius Pompi Bramono
 
Fracture mechanics CTOD Crack Tip Opening Displacement
Fracture mechanics CTOD Crack Tip Opening DisplacementFracture mechanics CTOD Crack Tip Opening Displacement
Fracture mechanics CTOD Crack Tip Opening Displacement
Davalsab M.L
 
Impact test
Impact testImpact test
Impact test
kidist w.
 
Non Destructive Testing (NDT), Testing of Materials
Non Destructive Testing (NDT), Testing of MaterialsNon Destructive Testing (NDT), Testing of Materials
Non Destructive Testing (NDT), Testing of Materials
Dr.S.Thirumalvalavan
 
Brinell Hardness Testing Method
Brinell Hardness Testing Method Brinell Hardness Testing Method
Brinell Hardness Testing Method
Shrey Patel
 
Chapter 4: Material Testing
Chapter 4: Material TestingChapter 4: Material Testing
Chapter 4: Material Testing
syar 2604
 
Creep
CreepCreep
Mechanical Testing of Materials
Mechanical Testing of Materials Mechanical Testing of Materials
Mechanical Testing of Materials
JJ Technical Solutions
 
Non Destructive Testing
Non Destructive TestingNon Destructive Testing
Non Destructive Testing
Himanshi Gupta
 
Rockwell hardness test
Rockwell hardness testRockwell hardness test
Rockwell hardness testAbdul Rahman
 
Tensile testing ppt
Tensile testing pptTensile testing ppt
Tensile testing ppt
Rahul Yadav
 
Hardness
HardnessHardness
Hardness
Akhtar Husain
 
Failure Mechanism In Ductile & Brittle Material
Failure Mechanism In Ductile & Brittle MaterialFailure Mechanism In Ductile & Brittle Material
Failure Mechanism In Ductile & Brittle Material
shaikhsaif
 
Forming process forging
Forming process forgingForming process forging
Forming process forging
N.Prakasan
 

What's hot (20)

Hardness testing
Hardness testingHardness testing
Hardness testing
 
Lec 2 compression test
Lec 2 compression  testLec 2 compression  test
Lec 2 compression test
 
12 fatigue of metals
12 fatigue of metals12 fatigue of metals
12 fatigue of metals
 
Mechanical Testing : Testing Of Materials
Mechanical Testing : Testing Of MaterialsMechanical Testing : Testing Of Materials
Mechanical Testing : Testing Of Materials
 
01 introduction to_mechanical_metallurgy
01 introduction to_mechanical_metallurgy01 introduction to_mechanical_metallurgy
01 introduction to_mechanical_metallurgy
 
Destructive test
Destructive testDestructive test
Destructive test
 
Fracture mechanics CTOD Crack Tip Opening Displacement
Fracture mechanics CTOD Crack Tip Opening DisplacementFracture mechanics CTOD Crack Tip Opening Displacement
Fracture mechanics CTOD Crack Tip Opening Displacement
 
impact test 10-4
impact test 10-4impact test 10-4
impact test 10-4
 
Impact test
Impact testImpact test
Impact test
 
Non Destructive Testing (NDT), Testing of Materials
Non Destructive Testing (NDT), Testing of MaterialsNon Destructive Testing (NDT), Testing of Materials
Non Destructive Testing (NDT), Testing of Materials
 
Brinell Hardness Testing Method
Brinell Hardness Testing Method Brinell Hardness Testing Method
Brinell Hardness Testing Method
 
Chapter 4: Material Testing
Chapter 4: Material TestingChapter 4: Material Testing
Chapter 4: Material Testing
 
Creep
CreepCreep
Creep
 
Mechanical Testing of Materials
Mechanical Testing of Materials Mechanical Testing of Materials
Mechanical Testing of Materials
 
Non Destructive Testing
Non Destructive TestingNon Destructive Testing
Non Destructive Testing
 
Rockwell hardness test
Rockwell hardness testRockwell hardness test
Rockwell hardness test
 
Tensile testing ppt
Tensile testing pptTensile testing ppt
Tensile testing ppt
 
Hardness
HardnessHardness
Hardness
 
Failure Mechanism In Ductile & Brittle Material
Failure Mechanism In Ductile & Brittle MaterialFailure Mechanism In Ductile & Brittle Material
Failure Mechanism In Ductile & Brittle Material
 
Forming process forging
Forming process forgingForming process forging
Forming process forging
 

Similar to Impact testing

Chapter4 150109005052-conversion-gate02
Chapter4 150109005052-conversion-gate02Chapter4 150109005052-conversion-gate02
Chapter4 150109005052-conversion-gate02
Cleophas Rwemera
 
MATERIALS-ENGG-UNIT- 3.pdf
MATERIALS-ENGG-UNIT- 3.pdfMATERIALS-ENGG-UNIT- 3.pdf
MATERIALS-ENGG-UNIT- 3.pdf
PRASANNA NAGASAI BELLAMKONDA
 
Mechanical Testing.pptx
Mechanical Testing.pptxMechanical Testing.pptx
Mechanical Testing.pptx
Ajith Damodaran
 
Chapter4 mechanical testing
Chapter4 mechanical testingChapter4 mechanical testing
Chapter4 mechanical testingWan Zulfadli
 
TESTING OF THE MATERIALS
TESTING OF THE MATERIALSTESTING OF THE MATERIALS
TESTING OF THE MATERIALSAMIT KUMAR
 
unit-5.pptx
unit-5.pptxunit-5.pptx
unit-5.pptx
SaurabhKumarGupta25
 
5_2018_03_27!12_19_18_PM.pptx
5_2018_03_27!12_19_18_PM.pptx5_2018_03_27!12_19_18_PM.pptx
5_2018_03_27!12_19_18_PM.pptx
jsmfhxbn54
 
251357076-Material-testing-ppt.ppt
251357076-Material-testing-ppt.ppt251357076-Material-testing-ppt.ppt
251357076-Material-testing-ppt.ppt
RajthilakG2
 
MATERIAL_TESTING_UOE final.pptx
MATERIAL_TESTING_UOE final.pptxMATERIAL_TESTING_UOE final.pptx
MATERIAL_TESTING_UOE final.pptx
ShashiShash2
 
Compression and Torsion Testing.pptx
Compression and Torsion Testing.pptxCompression and Torsion Testing.pptx
Compression and Torsion Testing.pptx
PRASANNA NAGASAI BELLAMKONDA
 
SOM MANUAL.docx
SOM MANUAL.docxSOM MANUAL.docx
SOM MANUAL.docx
VENKATESH676259
 
Materials testing
Materials testingMaterials testing
Materials testing
rishal619
 
Welding 3
Welding  3Welding  3
Welding 3
Jithu John
 
U2 mechanicalproperties&theirtesting
U2 mechanicalproperties&theirtestingU2 mechanicalproperties&theirtesting
U2 mechanicalproperties&theirtesting
BalbirsinghGuron
 
Hardness test
Hardness testHardness test
materialstesting-170705101936.pdf
materialstesting-170705101936.pdfmaterialstesting-170705101936.pdf
materialstesting-170705101936.pdf
FaizanSolanki
 
Materials testing
Materials testingMaterials testing
Materials testing
Chetan vadodariya
 
Physical properties of dental material [autosaved]
Physical properties of dental material [autosaved]Physical properties of dental material [autosaved]
Physical properties of dental material [autosaved]
shailjakatiyar2
 
Non Destructive test
Non Destructive testNon Destructive test
Non Destructive test
Gaurang Kakadiya
 

Similar to Impact testing (20)

Chapter4 150109005052-conversion-gate02
Chapter4 150109005052-conversion-gate02Chapter4 150109005052-conversion-gate02
Chapter4 150109005052-conversion-gate02
 
MATERIALS-ENGG-UNIT- 3.pdf
MATERIALS-ENGG-UNIT- 3.pdfMATERIALS-ENGG-UNIT- 3.pdf
MATERIALS-ENGG-UNIT- 3.pdf
 
Mechanical Testing.pptx
Mechanical Testing.pptxMechanical Testing.pptx
Mechanical Testing.pptx
 
Chapter4 mechanical testing
Chapter4 mechanical testingChapter4 mechanical testing
Chapter4 mechanical testing
 
TESTING OF THE MATERIALS
TESTING OF THE MATERIALSTESTING OF THE MATERIALS
TESTING OF THE MATERIALS
 
unit-5.pptx
unit-5.pptxunit-5.pptx
unit-5.pptx
 
5_2018_03_27!12_19_18_PM.pptx
5_2018_03_27!12_19_18_PM.pptx5_2018_03_27!12_19_18_PM.pptx
5_2018_03_27!12_19_18_PM.pptx
 
251357076-Material-testing-ppt.ppt
251357076-Material-testing-ppt.ppt251357076-Material-testing-ppt.ppt
251357076-Material-testing-ppt.ppt
 
Chapter 4 (JF302)
Chapter 4 (JF302)Chapter 4 (JF302)
Chapter 4 (JF302)
 
MATERIAL_TESTING_UOE final.pptx
MATERIAL_TESTING_UOE final.pptxMATERIAL_TESTING_UOE final.pptx
MATERIAL_TESTING_UOE final.pptx
 
Compression and Torsion Testing.pptx
Compression and Torsion Testing.pptxCompression and Torsion Testing.pptx
Compression and Torsion Testing.pptx
 
SOM MANUAL.docx
SOM MANUAL.docxSOM MANUAL.docx
SOM MANUAL.docx
 
Materials testing
Materials testingMaterials testing
Materials testing
 
Welding 3
Welding  3Welding  3
Welding 3
 
U2 mechanicalproperties&theirtesting
U2 mechanicalproperties&theirtestingU2 mechanicalproperties&theirtesting
U2 mechanicalproperties&theirtesting
 
Hardness test
Hardness testHardness test
Hardness test
 
materialstesting-170705101936.pdf
materialstesting-170705101936.pdfmaterialstesting-170705101936.pdf
materialstesting-170705101936.pdf
 
Materials testing
Materials testingMaterials testing
Materials testing
 
Physical properties of dental material [autosaved]
Physical properties of dental material [autosaved]Physical properties of dental material [autosaved]
Physical properties of dental material [autosaved]
 
Non Destructive test
Non Destructive testNon Destructive test
Non Destructive test
 

Recently uploaded

Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&BDesign and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Sreedhar Chowdam
 
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxCFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
R&R Consult
 
H.Seo, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
H.Seo,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB,  KAIST AI.pdfH.Seo,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB,  KAIST AI.pdf
H.Seo, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
MLILAB
 
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
AafreenAbuthahir2
 
The role of big data in decision making.
The role of big data in decision making.The role of big data in decision making.
The role of big data in decision making.
ankuprajapati0525
 
Fundamentals of Electric Drives and its applications.pptx
Fundamentals of Electric Drives and its applications.pptxFundamentals of Electric Drives and its applications.pptx
Fundamentals of Electric Drives and its applications.pptx
manasideore6
 
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
MdTanvirMahtab2
 
RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...
RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...
RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...
thanhdowork
 
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdfroad safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
VENKATESHvenky89705
 
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
Amil Baba Dawood bangali
 
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdf
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdfCosmetic shop management system project report.pdf
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdfJ.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
MLILAB
 
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
ydteq
 
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdfHybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
fxintegritypublishin
 
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
AJAYKUMARPUND1
 
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfFinal project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
block diagram and signal flow graph representation
block diagram and signal flow graph representationblock diagram and signal flow graph representation
block diagram and signal flow graph representation
Divya Somashekar
 
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdfMCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
Osamah Alsalih
 
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单专业办理
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单专业办理一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单专业办理
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单专业办理
zwunae
 
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional ElectiveCME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
karthi keyan
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&BDesign and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
 
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxCFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
 
H.Seo, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
H.Seo,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB,  KAIST AI.pdfH.Seo,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB,  KAIST AI.pdf
H.Seo, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
 
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
 
The role of big data in decision making.
The role of big data in decision making.The role of big data in decision making.
The role of big data in decision making.
 
Fundamentals of Electric Drives and its applications.pptx
Fundamentals of Electric Drives and its applications.pptxFundamentals of Electric Drives and its applications.pptx
Fundamentals of Electric Drives and its applications.pptx
 
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)
 
RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...
RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...
RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...
 
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdfroad safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
 
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
 
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdf
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdfCosmetic shop management system project report.pdf
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdf
 
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdfJ.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
 
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
 
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdfHybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
 
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
 
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfFinal project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
 
block diagram and signal flow graph representation
block diagram and signal flow graph representationblock diagram and signal flow graph representation
block diagram and signal flow graph representation
 
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdfMCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
 
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单专业办理
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单专业办理一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单专业办理
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单专业办理
 
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional ElectiveCME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
 

Impact testing

  • 2. INTRODUCTION • A simple tensile test does not reveal the brittle nature of the metals, and if only the tensile test data are relied upon and the object is put into use, failure is certain. • It is, therefore, necessary to test the material under shock or sudden loading conditions. • The components like locomotive connecting rods, wheels etc., are subjected to impact(shock) loads.These loads are applied suddenly. • An impact test is used to observe the mechanics that a material will exhibit when it experiences a shock loading that causes the specimen to immediately deform, fracture or rupture completely. • Notched-bar impact tests are subject to considerable scatter, particularly in the region of the transition temperature. Most of this scatter is due to local variations in the properties of the steel, while some is due to difficulties in preparing perfectly reproducible notches. • Both notch shape and depth are critical variables, as is the proper placement of the specimen in the impact machine.
  • 3. Types of impact tests: • For a single impact test the three most popular types of test are 1) the CharpyV-notch test, 2) the Izod test and 3) theTensile Impact test. • These three tests all essentially determine the same characteristics of the material but differ in the orientation of the test sample which causes the sample to be stressed in different directions and involve a known weight released from a known height colliding with the specimen in its test fixture. All of these tests are useful in determining the impact mechanics of the test specimen.
  • 4. SIGNIFICANCE OF NOTCHED-BAR IMPACT TESTING NOTCH BEHAVIOUR: • The notch behavior of the face-centered cubic metals and alloys, a large group of nonferrous materials and the austenitic steels can be judged from their common tensile properties. If they are brittle in tension, they will be brittle when notched, while if they are ductile in tension they will be ductile when notched, except for unusually sharp or deep notches (much more severe than the standard Charpy or Izod specimens). Even low temperatures do not alter this characteristic of these materials. • In contrast, the behavior of the ferritic steels under notch conditions cannot be predicted from their properties as revealed by the tension test. For the study of these materials the Charpy and Izod type tests are accordingly very useful. Some metals that display normal ductility in the tension test may nevertheless break in brittle fashion when tested or when used in the notched condition. Notched conditions include constraints to deformation in directions perpendicular to the major stress, or multi axial stresses, and stress.
  • 5. NOTCH EFFECT: • The notch results in a combination of multi axial stresses associated with restraints to deformation in directions perpendicular to the major stress, and a stress concentration at the base of the notch. • A severely notched condition is generally not desirable, and it becomes of real concern in those cases in which it initiates a sudden and complete failure of the brittle type. • Some metals can be deformed in a ductile manner even down to very low temperatures, while others may crack. This difference in behavior can be best understood by considering the cohesive strength of a material (or the property that holds it together) and its relation to the yield point. • In cases of brittle fracture, the cohesive strength is exceeded before significant plastic deformation occurs and the fracture appears crystalline. • In cases of the ductile or shear type of failure, considerable deformation precedes the final fracture and the broken surface appears fibrous instead of crystalline. • In intermediate cases, the fracture comes after a moderate amount of deformation and is part crystalline and part fibrous in appearance.
  • 6. CHARPY IMPACT TEST • Charpy impact testing is a low-cost and reliable test method which is commonly required by the construction codes for fracture-critical structures such as bridges and pressure vessels. • It took from about 1900 to 1960 for impact-test technology and procedures to reach levels of accuracy and reproducibility such that the procedures could be broadly applied as standard test methods. • The Charpy impact test, also known as the Charpy V-notch test, is a high strain-rate test that involves striking a standard notched specimen with a controlled weight pendulum swung from a set height. The impact test helps measure the amount of energy absorbed by the specimen during fracture. • Charpy tests show whether a metal can be classified as being either brittle or ductile. This is particularly useful for ferritic steels that show a ductile to brittle transition with decreasing temperature. A brittle metal will absorb a small amount of energy when impact tested, a tough ductile metal absorbs a large amount of energy. • The appearance of a fracture surface also gives information about the type of fracture that has occurred; a brittle fracture is bright and crystalline, a ductile fracture is dull and fibrous. The percentage crystallinity is determined by making a judgement of the amount of crystalline or brittle fracture on the surface of the broken specimen, and is a measure of the amount of brittle fracture. • Lateral expansion is a measure of the ductility of the specimen. When a ductile metal is broken, the test- piece deforms before breaking, and material is squeezed out on the sides of the compression face. The amount by which the specimen deforms in this way is measured and expressed as millimetres of lateral expansion. • The British Standard for Charpy testing is BS EN ISO 148-1:2009 and the American Standard is ASTM E23.
  • 7. • The ASTM E23 Charpy testing standard uses a 2-2.5mm radius striker whereas BS ISO EN 148-1 can use either a 2mm or 8mm striker. • Consequently, for materials with a high Charpy energy (above approx. 100J), more energy will be absorbed by the 8mm striker than by the 2mm striker equivalent and tests carried out using the 8mm striker will report higher impact energy. • To carry out the test the standard specimen is supported at its two ends on an anvil and struck on the opposite face to the notch by a pendulum .The specimen is fractured and the pendulum swings through, the height of the swing being a measure of the amount of energy absorbed in fracturing the specimen. Conventionally three specimens are tested at any one temperature, and the results averaged. • When reporting the results of a Charpy test, the absorbed energy (in Joules) is always reported, while the percentage crystallinity and lateral expansion are optional on the test report. • It should be emphasised that Charpy tests are qualitative, the results can only be compared with each other or with a requirement in a specification - they cannot be used to calculate the fracture toughness of a metal.
  • 8. TEST SPECIMEN OF CHARPY IMPACT TEST: • The standard Charpy-V notch specimen is 55mm long, 10mm square and has a 2mm deep notch with a tip radius of 0.25mm machined on one face. • The notch shall be carefully prepared so that the root radius of the notch is free of machining marks which could affect the absorbed energy. • The plane of symmetry of the notch shall be perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the test piece. • The specimens shown in Fig.1 are those most widely used and most generally satisfactory.They are particularly suitable for ferrous metals, excepting cast iron.
  • 9. Pendulums used on Charpy machines are of three basic designs.They are: a) C-type Pendulum b) Compound Pendulum c) U-type Pendulum
  • 10. • A weighted pendulum, which is held at some height h from the sample, swings and impacts the sample at a very high strain rate. The pendulum then continues to swing until reaching a final height of h′. The difference between the potential energies at height h and h′ is considering to be the energy that the sample absorbed upon impact. Energy absorbed=mg(h-h’) where; m=mass of stricker hammer, g=acceleration due to gravity =9.8m/s2 Charpy testing machine
  • 11. Test specimens after impact test Direction of impact load on the specimen in CharpyV-notch and Izod impact test
  • 12. 1)The absorbed energy shall be taken as the difference between the energy in the striking member at the instant of impact with the specimen and the energy remaining after breaking the specimen.This value is determined by the machine’s scale reading which has been corrected for windage and friction losses. 2)Lateral expansion: A measure of the ability of the material to resist fracture when subjected to triaxial stresses, such as those at the root of the notch in a Charpy test piece, is the amount of deformation that occurs at this location.The deformation in this case is contraction. Because of the difficulties in measuring this deformation, even after fracture, the expansion that occurs at the opposite end of the fracture plane is customarily measured and used as a proxy for the contraction. 3)Fracture appearance: The fracture surface of Charpy test pieces is often rated by the percentage of shear fracture which occurs. The greater the percentage of shear fracture, the greater the notch toughness of the material. The fracture surface of most Charpy specimens exhibits a mixture of shear and flat fracture regions. The shear regions are assumed to be fully ductile, but the flat fracture regions can be ductile, brittle, or a combination of these fracture modes. Because the rating is extremely subjective, it is recommended that it is not to be used in specifications. NOTE: The term fibrous-fracture appearance is often used as a synonym for shear fracture appearance. The terms cleavage fracture appearance and crystallinity are often used to express the opposite of shear fracture. Information Obtainable from Impact Tests
  • 13.
  • 14. Schematic Charpy-V energy and percentage crystallinity curves SIGNIFICANCEOFTRANSITION- TEMPERATURECURVE: The chief engineering use of the Charpy test is in selecting materials which are resistant to brittle fracture by means of transition-temperature curves.The design philosophy is to select a material which has sufficient notch toughness when subjected to severe service conditions so that the load-carrying ability of the structural member can be calculated by standard strength of materials methods without considering the fracture properties of the material or stress concentration effects of cracks or flaws.
  • 15. ADVANTAGES OF IMPACT TESTING • The principal advantages of the Charpy V-notch impact test is that it is a relatively simple test that utilizes a relatively cheap, small test specimen. • Tests can readily be carried out over a range of subambient temperatures. • Moreover, the design of the test specimen is well suited for measuring differences in notch toughness in low-strength materials such as structural steels. • The test is used for comparing the influence of alloy studies and heat treatment on notch toughness. • It is frequently used for quality control and material acceptance purposes.
  • 16. LIMITATIONS OF IMPACT TESTING • These test methods do not address the problems associated with impact testing at temperatures below –196 °C (–320 °F, 77 K). • The results of the tests obtained are difficult to use in design. • Since there is no measurement in terms of stress level, it is difficult to correlate CV (the energy required for fracture of a Charpy specimen) data with service performance. • Moreover, there is no correlation of Charpy data with flaw size. • In addition, the large scatter inherent in the test may make it difficult to determine well-defined transition-temperature curves. • The chief deficiency of the Charpy impact test is that the small specimen is not always a realistic model of the actual situation. Not only does the small specimen lead to considerable scatter, but a specimen with a thickness of 10 mm cannot provide the same constraint as would be found in a structure with a much greater thickness.
  • 17. IZOD IMPACT TEST • The Izod test has become the standard testing procedure for comparing the impact resistances of plastics. While being the standard for plastics, it is also used on other materials. • The Izod test is most commonly used to evaluate the relative toughness or impact toughness of materials and as such is often used in quality control applications where it is a fast and economical test. It is used more as a comparative test rather than a definitive test. This is also in part due to the fact that the values do not relate accurately to the impact strength of moulded parts or actual components under actual operational conditions. • The Izod test involves striking a suitable test piece with a striker, mounted at the end of a pendulum. The test piece is clamped vertically with the notch facing the striker. The striker swings downwards impacting the test piece at the bottom of its swing.
  • 18. Schematic diagram of Izod impact test
  • 19. • The standard test piece of overall length of 75mm and a square cross- section of 10mm side with a standard 45° notch, 2mm deep is employed for the test.The notch is at 28mm from one end. • The notch shall be carefully prepared so that the root radius of the notch is free of machining marks which could affect the absorbed energy. • The plane of symmetry of the notch shall be perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the test piece. • The specimen shown in Fig.2 is the most widely used and most generally satisfactory. It is particularly suitable for ferrous metals, excepting cast iron. TEST SPECIMEN OF IZOD IMPACT TEST: