This document discusses ICH guidelines related to impurities in new drug substances and products. It defines key terms like impurity, identified impurity, and potential impurity. It categorizes impurities as organic, inorganic, or residual solvents. The guidelines provide thresholds for identification, qualification, and reporting of impurities. They also classify residual solvents and elemental impurities based on their toxicity, providing permissible daily exposure limits. The guidelines aim to establish qualification of impurities at levels present in early clinical trials and provide a risk-based approach to control impurities.
New guidelines relating to elemental impurities from the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), Q3D Guideline for Elemental Impurities have presented the pharmaceutical industry with new challenges. This new guidance has been developed to provide a global policy for limiting metal impurities qualitatively and quantitatively in drug products and ingredients.
New guidelines relating to elemental impurities from the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), Q3D Guideline for Elemental Impurities have presented the pharmaceutical industry with new challenges. This new guidance has been developed to provide a global policy for limiting metal impurities qualitatively and quantitatively in drug products and ingredients.
Validation: Validation is a documented program that provides high degree of assurance that a specific process, method or system consistently produces a result meeting pre-determined acceptance criteria.
It is process of “Establishing documentary evidence that provide a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes”.
In the pharmaceutical industry, it is very important that in addition to final testing and compliance of products, it is also assured that the process will consistently produce the expected results.
Validation is action of proving in accordance with the principles of good manufacturing practices, that any procedure, process, equipment, material, activity or system actually leads to expected results.
Cleaning validation is documented evidence with a high degree assurance that one can consistently clean a system or a piece of equipment to predetermined and acceptable limits.
The primary regulatory concern driving the need for cleaning validation is cross contamination of the desired drug substance either by other API from previous batch runs or by residues from the cleaning agents used.
The prime purpose of validating a cleaning process is to ensure compliance with federal and other standard regulations
1. Cross contamination with active ingredients
Contamination of one batch of product with significant levels of residual active ingredients from previous batch cannot be tolerated.
In addition to the obvious problems posed by subjecting consumers or patients to unintended contaminants, potential clinically significant synergistic interactions between pharmacologically active chemicals are a real concern.
2. Contamination with unintended materials or compounds
While inert ingredients used in drug products are generally recognized as safe for human consumption, the routine use, maintenance and cleaning of equipment's provide the potential contamination with such items as equipment parts, lubricants and chemical cleaning agents3. Microbiological contamination
Maintenance , cleaning and storage conditions may provide adventitious microorganisms with the opportunity to proliferate within the processing equipment.
This document is intended to provide guidance for registration applications on the content and qualification of impurities in new drug substances produced by chemical syntheses and not previously registered in a region or member state.
Manufacturing Control Systems. J R Controls provides control systems for the manufacturing industry. A typical control system will monitor the progress of parts through the manufacturing and finishing process.
Validation: Validation is a documented program that provides high degree of assurance that a specific process, method or system consistently produces a result meeting pre-determined acceptance criteria.
It is process of “Establishing documentary evidence that provide a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes”.
In the pharmaceutical industry, it is very important that in addition to final testing and compliance of products, it is also assured that the process will consistently produce the expected results.
Validation is action of proving in accordance with the principles of good manufacturing practices, that any procedure, process, equipment, material, activity or system actually leads to expected results.
Cleaning validation is documented evidence with a high degree assurance that one can consistently clean a system or a piece of equipment to predetermined and acceptable limits.
The primary regulatory concern driving the need for cleaning validation is cross contamination of the desired drug substance either by other API from previous batch runs or by residues from the cleaning agents used.
The prime purpose of validating a cleaning process is to ensure compliance with federal and other standard regulations
1. Cross contamination with active ingredients
Contamination of one batch of product with significant levels of residual active ingredients from previous batch cannot be tolerated.
In addition to the obvious problems posed by subjecting consumers or patients to unintended contaminants, potential clinically significant synergistic interactions between pharmacologically active chemicals are a real concern.
2. Contamination with unintended materials or compounds
While inert ingredients used in drug products are generally recognized as safe for human consumption, the routine use, maintenance and cleaning of equipment's provide the potential contamination with such items as equipment parts, lubricants and chemical cleaning agents3. Microbiological contamination
Maintenance , cleaning and storage conditions may provide adventitious microorganisms with the opportunity to proliferate within the processing equipment.
This document is intended to provide guidance for registration applications on the content and qualification of impurities in new drug substances produced by chemical syntheses and not previously registered in a region or member state.
Manufacturing Control Systems. J R Controls provides control systems for the manufacturing industry. A typical control system will monitor the progress of parts through the manufacturing and finishing process.
THE PRESENTATIONS DESCRIBES THE ICH GUIDELINE FOR RESIDUAL SOLVENTS i.e Q3C.
IT contains the basic of ICH and the complete description about the ICH guideline Q3C and its classification,limits,acceptance criteria in Pharma industries and the standards.
#Pharmaceuticalguideline
#medicine
#healthandmedicine
ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE - IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS Q3B(R2)ShahnoorRasheed
Guidance for registration applications on the content and qualification of impurities in new drug products produced from chemically synthesized new drug substances not previously registered in a region or member state.
Degradation products present at a level of not more than (≤) the identification threshold generally would not need to be identified.
Analytical procedures should be developed for those degradation products that are suspected to be unusually potent, producing toxic or significant pharmacological effects at levels not more than (≤) the identification threshold.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
When an analytical procedure reveals the presence of other peaks in addition to those of the degradation products (e.g., the drug substance, impurities arising from the synthesis of the drug substance, excipients and impurities arising from the excipients), these peaks should be labeled in the chromatograms.
VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The registration application should include documented evidence that the analytical procedures have been validated and are suitable for the detection and quantitation of degradation products
COMPARISION OF DEGRADATIVES TO STANDARDS
Degradation product levels can be measured by a variety of techniques, including those that compare an analytical response for a degradation product to that of an appropriate reference standard.
REPORTING IMPURITY CONTENT OF BATCHES
• Quantitative results should be represented numerically
• Impurities should be designated by code number or by an appropriate descriptor.
• When analytical procedures change during development, reported results should be linked to the procedure used, with appropriate validation information provided.
• A tabulation should be provided that links the specific new drug substance batch to each safety study clinical study in which it has been used and should also include complete drug information.
LISTING OF IMPURITIES IN SPECIFICATION
The new drug substance specification should include, where applicable, the following list of impurities:
Organic Impurities
• Each specified identified impurity
• Each specified unidentified impurity
• Any unspecified impurity with an acceptance criterion of not more than (≤) the identification threshold
• Total impurities
Residual Solvents
Inorganic Impurities
QUALIFICATION OF IMPURITIES
The level of any impurity present in a new drug substance that has been adequately tested in safety and/or clinical studies would be considered qualified.
The "Decision Tree for Identification and Qualification" describes considerations for the qualification of impurities when thresholds are exceeded.
Safety assessment studies to qualify an impurity should compare the new drug substance containing a representative amount of the new impurity with previously qualified material.
Safety assessment studies using a sample of the isolated impurity can also be considered.
POTENTIAL SOURCES OF ELEMENTAL IMPURITIESMehulJain143
INTRODUCTION
INDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ELEMENTAL IMPURITIES
FACTORS AFFECTING
EVALUATION
RISK ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL OF ELEMENTAL IMPURITIES
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
To recommend acceptable amounts for residual solvents in pharmaceuticals for the safety of the patient. The guideline recommends use of less toxic solvents and describes levels considered to be toxicologically acceptable for some residual solvents.
The guideline applies to all dosage forms and routes of administration.
This guidelines does not address all possible solvents, only those identified in drugs at that time, neither address solvents intentionally used as excipients nor solvates.
The maximum acceptable intake per day of residual solvent in pharmaceutical products is defined as “permitted daily exposure” (PDE)
Previously, another terms were used like “Tolerable daily intake” (TDI) & “Acceptable daily intake” (ADI) by different organization & authorities, but now usually this new term “PDE” is used
Global launch of the Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index 2nd wave – alongside...ILC- UK
The Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index is an online tool created by ILC that ranks countries on six metrics including, life span, health span, work span, income, environmental performance, and happiness. The Index helps us understand how well countries have adapted to longevity and inform decision makers on what must be done to maximise the economic benefits that comes with living well for longer.
Alongside the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva on 28 May 2024, we launched the second version of our Index, allowing us to track progress and give new insights into what needs to be done to keep populations healthier for longer.
The speakers included:
Professor Orazio Schillaci, Minister of Health, Italy
Dr Hans Groth, Chairman of the Board, World Demographic & Ageing Forum
Professor Ilona Kickbusch, Founder and Chair, Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute and co-chair, World Health Summit Council
Dr Natasha Azzopardi Muscat, Director, Country Health Policies and Systems Division, World Health Organisation EURO
Dr Marta Lomazzi, Executive Manager, World Federation of Public Health Associations
Dr Shyam Bishen, Head, Centre for Health and Healthcare and Member of the Executive Committee, World Economic Forum
Dr Karin Tegmark Wisell, Director General, Public Health Agency of Sweden
Medical Technology Tackles New Health Care Demand - Research Report - March 2...pchutichetpong
M Capital Group (“MCG”) predicts that with, against, despite, and even without the global pandemic, the medical technology (MedTech) industry shows signs of continuous healthy growth, driven by smaller, faster, and cheaper devices, growing demand for home-based applications, technological innovation, strategic acquisitions, investments, and SPAC listings. MCG predicts that this should reflects itself in annual growth of over 6%, well beyond 2028.
According to Chris Mouchabhani, Managing Partner at M Capital Group, “Despite all economic scenarios that one may consider, beyond overall economic shocks, medical technology should remain one of the most promising and robust sectors over the short to medium term and well beyond 2028.”
There is a movement towards home-based care for the elderly, next generation scanning and MRI devices, wearable technology, artificial intelligence incorporation, and online connectivity. Experts also see a focus on predictive, preventive, personalized, participatory, and precision medicine, with rising levels of integration of home care and technological innovation.
The average cost of treatment has been rising across the board, creating additional financial burdens to governments, healthcare providers and insurance companies. According to MCG, cost-per-inpatient-stay in the United States alone rose on average annually by over 13% between 2014 to 2021, leading MedTech to focus research efforts on optimized medical equipment at lower price points, whilst emphasizing portability and ease of use. Namely, 46% of the 1,008 medical technology companies in the 2021 MedTech Innovator (“MTI”) database are focusing on prevention, wellness, detection, or diagnosis, signaling a clear push for preventive care to also tackle costs.
In addition, there has also been a lasting impact on consumer and medical demand for home care, supported by the pandemic. Lockdowns, closure of care facilities, and healthcare systems subjected to capacity pressure, accelerated demand away from traditional inpatient care. Now, outpatient care solutions are driving industry production, with nearly 70% of recent diagnostics start-up companies producing products in areas such as ambulatory clinics, at-home care, and self-administered diagnostics.
India Clinical Trials Market: Industry Size and Growth Trends [2030] Analyzed...Kumar Satyam
According to TechSci Research report, "India Clinical Trials Market- By Region, Competition, Forecast & Opportunities, 2030F," the India Clinical Trials Market was valued at USD 2.05 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.64% through 2030. The market is driven by a variety of factors, making India an attractive destination for pharmaceutical companies and researchers. India's vast and diverse patient population, cost-effective operational environment, and a large pool of skilled medical professionals contribute significantly to the market's growth. Additionally, increasing government support in streamlining regulations and the growing prevalence of lifestyle diseases further propel the clinical trials market.
Growing Prevalence of Lifestyle Diseases
The rising incidence of lifestyle diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer is a major trend driving the clinical trials market in India. These conditions necessitate the development and testing of new treatment methods, creating a robust demand for clinical trials. The increasing burden of these diseases highlights the need for innovative therapies and underscores the importance of India as a key player in global clinical research.
One of the most developed cities of India, the city of Chennai is the capital of Tamilnadu and many people from different parts of India come here to earn their bread and butter. Being a metropolitan, the city is filled with towering building and beaches but the sad part as with almost every Indian city
2. • Impurity: Any component of the new drug substance that is not the chemical entity defined as the
impurity.
• Identified Impurity: An impurity for which a structural characterization has been achieved.
• Identification Threshold: A limit above (>) which an impurity should be identified.
• Impurity Profile: A description of the identified and unidentified impurities present in a new drug
substance.
• Potential Impurity: An impurity that theoretically can arise during manufacture or storage. It may or
may not actually appear in the new drug substance.
• Qualification: The process of acquiring and evaluating data that establishes the biological safety of
an individual impurity or a given impurity profile at the level(s) specified.
TERMINOLOGIES
3. • Qualification Threshold: A limit above (>) which an impurity should be qualified.
• Reporting Threshold: A limit above (>) which an impurity should be reported.
• Specified Impurity: An impurity that is individually listed and limited with a specific acceptance
criterion in the new drug substance specification. A specified impurity can be either identified or
unidentified.
• Unidentified Impurity: An impurity for which a structural characterisation has not been achieved
and that is defined solely by qualitative analytical properties (e.g., chromatographic retention time).
• Unspecified impurity: An impurity that is limited by a general acceptance criterion, but not
individually listed with its own specific acceptance criterion, in the new drug substance
specification.
• Degradation Product: An impurity resulting from a chemical change in the drug substance
brought about during manufacture and/or storage of the new drug product by the effect of, for
example, light, temperature, pH, water, or by reaction with an excipient and/or the immediate
container closure system.
4. CLASSIFICATION OF IMPURITIES
Organic
impurities
Inorganic
impurities
Residual
solvents
• Starting materials
• By-products
• Intermediates
• Degradation products
• Reagents, ligands and catalysts
Solvents are inorganic or
organic liquids used as
vehicles for the
preparation of solutions or
suspensions in the synthesis
of a new drug substance.
• Reagents, ligands and
catalysts
• Heavy metals or other
residual metals
• Inorganic salts
• Other materials (e.g.,
filter aids, charcoal)
5. Preamble
• Content and qualification of impurities in new drug substances produced by chemical syntheses.
• Not registered previously.
• Not applicable on new drug substances used during the clinical research stage of development.
• Impurities in new drug substances are addressed from two perspectives:
Chemistry Aspects include classification and identification of impurities, report generation, listing of
impurities in specifications, and a brief discussion of analytical procedures; and
Safety Aspects include specific guidance for qualifying those impurities that were not present, or were present
at substantially lower levels, in batches of a new drug substance used in safety and clinical studies.
IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES
Q3A(R2)
6. IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS
Q3B(R2)
• content and qualification of impurities in new drug products produced from chemically synthesised
new drug substances.
• Not registered previously.
• This guideline is complementary to the ICH Q3A(R) guideline “Impurities in New Drug
Substances”, which should be consulted for basic principles.
• This guideline addresses only those impurities in new drug products classified as degradation
products of the drug substance or reaction products of the drug substance with an excipient and/or
immediate container closure system.
• Impurities arising from excipients, leached or extracted from the container are not covered.
• does not apply to new drug products used during the clinical research stages of development.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. IMPURITIES: GUIDELINE FOR RESIDUAL SOLVENTS
Q3C(R7)
• The objective of this guideline is to recommend acceptable amounts for residual solvents in
pharmaceuticals for the safety of the patient.
• recommends use of less toxic solvents.
• Residual solvents- organic volatile chemicals that are used or produced in the manufacture of
drug substances or excipients, or in the preparation of drug products.
• does not address solvents deliberately used as excipients nor does it address solvates.
12. Classification of Residual Solvents
CLASS I SOLVENTS:
Solvents to be avoided
• Human carcinogens
CLASS III SOLVENTS:
Solvents with low toxic
potential
• low toxic potential to man
CLASS II SOLVENTS:
Solvents to be limited
• Non-genotoxic animal
carcinogens
13. Class I Solvents: Solvents to be avoided
• should not be employed in the manufacture of drug substances, excipients, and drug product.
• If unavoidable then limited should be restricted as shown
solvent Concentration limit (ppm) Concern
Benzene 2 Carcinogen
Carbon tetrachloride 4 Toxic an env. Hazard
1,2-Dichloroethane 5 Toxic
1,1-Dichloroethene 8 Toxic
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1500 Env. hazard
14. Class II: Solvents to Be Limited
• Limited because of inherent toxicity
• PDEs are given to the nearest 0.1 mg/day, and concentrations are given to the nearest 10 ppm
Solvent PDE (mg/day) Conc. Limit (ppm)
Acetonitrile 4.1 410
Chlorobenzene 3.6 360
Chloroform 0.6 60
Cumene1 0.7 70
cyclohexane 38.8 3880
1,2-Dichloroethene 18.7 1870
Dichloromethane 6.0 600
15. Class III Solvents: solvents with Low Toxic Potential
• regarded as less toxic and of lower risk to human health.
• considered that amounts of these residual solvents of 50 mg per day or less (corresponding to 5000
ppm or 0.5% under Option 1) would be acceptable without justification.
Acetic acid 2-Butanol
Heptane 3-Methyl-1-butanol
Acetone Butyl acetate
Isobutyl acetate Methylethyl ketone
Anisole tert-Butylmethyl ether
Isopropyl acetate 2-Methyl-1-propanol
1-Butanol 2Dimethyl sulfoxide
Methyl acetate Pentane
16. Solvents for which No Adequate Toxicological Data was Found
• no adequate toxicological data on which to base a PDE was found.
1,1-Diethoxypropane Methylisopropyl ketone
1,1-Dimethoxymethane Methyltetrahydrofuran
2,2-Dimethoxypropane Petroleum ether
Isooctane Trichloroacetic acid
Isopropyl ether Trifluoroacetic acid
17. GUIDELINE FOR ELEMENTAL IMPURITIES
Q3D(R1)
CH Q3D listed out 24 elements that need to be evaluated by drug product manufacturers, including
mercury, lead, cadmium and arsenic.
Source of elemental impurities could be from:
• residual catalysts added in synthesis
• may be present as impurities
• arising from processing equipment
• leaching from container/closure systems
• present in components of the drug product.
18. The guideline divided into following three parts:
1. The evaluation of the toxicity data for potential elemental impurities: Safety Assessment
2. The establishment of PDEs for each element of toxicological concern
3. Application of a risk-based approach to control elemental impurities in drug products.
This guideline presents a process to assess and control elemental impurities in the drug product
using the principles of risk management as described in ICH Q9.
The guideline applies to
• new finished drug products
• new drug products containing existing drug substances
• The drug products containing purified proteins and polypeptides and their derivatives,
19. Different classes based on their toxicity (PDE)
Class 3Class 2Class 1
• Highly toxic
• Special
consideration
is required
• Eg; As,
Cd,Hg and
Pb
• Relatively low
toxicity by oral
route of
administration
• Eg: Ba, Cr, Cu,
Li, Mo, Sb, and
Sn.
• Toxic to a
greater or
lesser extent
based on route
of
administration
Class 2A elements
have relatively high
probability of
occurrence
Eg: Co, Ni and V
Class 2B elements
have a reduced
probability of
occurrence
Eg: Ag, Au, Ir, Os, Pd,
Pt, Rh, Ru, Se and Tl
20. During the risk assessment, the potential contributions from each of these sources should be considered to
determine the overall contribution of elemental impurities to the drug product.”