HUMAN
LEARNING
ANNISA RATNA PURWANTI
DEWI NORMA
OUTLINE
LEARNING THEORIES
TYPES OF LEARNING
TRANSFER, INTERFERENCE, AND OVERGENERALIZATION
INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING
APTITUDE AND INTELLIGENCE
TEACHING METHODS
Points to Discuss
 How do human beings learn?
 Can you mention some theories of learning?
 Is one theory of learning “better” than
another?
DEFINITION
 Learning theories are an organized set of
principles explaining how individuals acquire,
retain, and recall knowledge.
 The principles of the theories can be used as
guidelines to help select instructional tools,
techniques and strategies that promote
learning.
LEARNING THEORIES
BEHAVIORISM (PAVLOV AND
SKINNER)
MEANINGFUL LEARNING THEORY
(AUSUBEL)
HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY
(ROGER)
WHAT IS BEHAVIORISM?
 Behaviors can be measured, trained, and
changed.
 Behaviorists believe a person’s environment
determines their behavior, that our responses to
environmental stimuli shape our behaviors.
 Learning as nothing more than the acquisition of
new behavior based on environmental conditions.
 Two kinds of conditioning; classical and operant
Pavlov ‘s Classical Conditioning
 It occurs when a natural reflex responds to a
stimulus.
 Learning process : association between
stimuli and reflex without punishment and
reward
 Experiments: A dog salivates to the sound of
a bell (Reflex – unconditioned response –
conditioned response)
Skinner ‘s Operant Conditioning
 It occurs when a response to a stimulus is reinforced (
simple feedback system)
 Learning process : If a reward or reinforcement
follows the response to a stimulus, then the response
becomes more probable in the future.
 Consequences that reinforce the desired behavior are
arranged to follow the desired behavior.
 The new behavioral pattern can be repeated so it
becomes automatic.
BEHAVIORISM IN THE
CLASSROOM
 Drilling
 Repetitive practice
 Bonus points (providing an incentive to do more)
 Participation points (providing an incentive to participate)
 Verbal Reinforcement (saying “good job”)
 Giving weekly quizzes/tests
 Using positive/negative reinforcement to encourage and
reward students for good behavior and to punish bad
behavior.
Criticism towards Behaviorism
 Behaviorism does not prepare the learner for
problem solving or creative thinking.
 Learners do what they are told and do not take the
initiative to change or improve things.
 The learner is only prepared for recalling of basic
facts, automatic responses or performing tasks.
WHAT IS AUSUBEL’S
MEANINGFUL LEARNING
THEORY?
 It is based on aptitude and capacity to learn, learning
styles, and it is also the basis of constructivism.
 To learn meaningfully, individuals must relate new
knowledge to relevant concepts they already know.
 New knowledge must interact with the learner’s
knowledge structure.
 Understanding concepts, principles, and ideas are
achieved through deductive reasoning.
 Emphasizing on meaningful learning than rote learning
 A concerned with
how students learn
large amounts of
meaningful
material from
verbal/textual
presentations in
learning activities
 Meaningful learning
results when new
information is
acquired by linking
the new information
in the learner’s own
cognitive structure
MEANINGFUL
LEARNING
THEORY
 A primary
process in
learning is
subsumption in
which new
material is
related to
relevant ideas
in the existing
cognitive
structure (prev
knowlegde)
Deductive Teaching Model
The pupils study
specific examples
The teacher presents
examples
The teacher explains
important terms
The teacher presents
general statement or
abstraction of lesson
Rote vs Meaningful Learning
ROTE LEARNING
 Little or no relevant knowledge
 No emotional commitment to relate new with existing
relevant knowledge
 Poorly organized subject matter
MEANINGFUL LEARNING
 Relevant knowdlegde structures
 Emotional commitment to integrate new with existing
knowledge
 Conceptual clear subject matter
Cognitivism in the classroom
 Planning curriculum based on what students have
already known and what they should learn
 Giving problem-solving scenarios and real-life
contexts for learning
 Creating interesting and motivating lesson that
engage students
 Integrating visual, audio, and giving examples in
lessons ((Examples: PowerPoint, songs, videos,
realias, websites)
Systematic Forgetting
 Proactive and retroactive inhibition
 Cognitive pruning procedures (children’s concept
of hotness)
 Subsumption theory: the rejection of conditioning
models
 Systematic forgetting: EFL teachers may urge
students to “forget” mechanical items as they
make progress in a language, and to focus more
on the communicative use of language
THE DIFFERENCES
ROGERS’S HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY
- CONSTRUCTIVIST -
 Roger’s humanistic psychology has affective focus
more than cognitive one, thus it is a perspective of a
constructivist learning.
 Social and interactive nature of learning
 The focus of constructivism is away from teaching
and toward learning. The goal of education is the
facilitation of change and learning.
 Rogers is not as concerned about the actual
cognitive process of learning because, for him, if the
context for learning is properly created, then human
beings will learn everything they need to.
To do list for teachers
 Be real and genuine, discarding masks of
superiority and omniscience
 Have a genuine trust, acceptance and prizing
of student as a valuable individual
 Communicate openly and empathetically
Important Clues to Constructivist
 Fully functioning person; live at peace with all of their feelings
and reactions; they able to reach their full potential
 Learning how to learn is more important than being taught
something from the superior vantage point of a teacher who
unilaterally decides what shall be taught.
 Community of learners: if the context for learning is properly
created, then human beings will learn everything they need to
 Empowerment of students in the classrooms: Students should
be allowed to negotiate learning outcomes, to cooperate with
teachers and other learners in a process of discovery, to engage
critical thinking and to relate everything they do in school to their
reality outside the classroom
DEVELOPMENT OF
ROGERSIAN TRADITION
 Paolo Freire (1970)
 Inspiring many teachers to consider the empowerment
of students in classroom
 Students should be allowed to negotiate learning
outcomes, to cooperate with teachers and other
learners in a process of discovery, to engage critical
thinking and to relate everything they do in school to
their reality outside the classroom
 Clarke (1990)
Such liberationist views of educations should be
approached with some caution, learners may nevertheless
be empowered to achieve solutions to real problems in the
real world
WEAKNESS OF
CONSTRUCTIVIST
 Loosing too much time in the process of
allowing students to discover facts and
principles for themselves
 A nonthreatening environment might become
so non-threatening that the facilitative tension
needed for learning is absent
THEORIES OF LEARNINGBEHAVIORISTIC COGNITIVE CONSTRUCTIVIST
Classical Operant
(Pavlov)
• Respondent
conditioning
• Elicited
response
• S  R
(Skinner)
• Governed by
consequences
• Emitted response
• R  S (reward)
• No punishment
• Programmed
instruction
(Ausubel)
• meaningful =
powerful
• Rote = weak
• Subsumption
• Association
• Systematic
forgetting
• Cogntitive
‘pruning’
(Rogers)
• Fully functioning
person
• Learn how to learn
• Community of
learners
• empowerment
Note:
S : stimulus
R: response, reward
Types of learning
 Gagne (1965) identified 8 types of learning:
• Signal learning
• Stimulus-response learning
• Chaining
• Verbal association
• Multiple discrimination
Behaviorism Views
• Concept learning
• Principle learning
• Problem solving
Cognitive and Constructivist
Second Language Learning in Gagne’s Types
of Learning
• Occurs in total language process; human beings make
a general response of some kind to lang.
Signal Learning
• Acquisition of the sound system of a foreign languageStimulus-Response
Learning
• Acquisition of phonological sequences and syntactic
patterns
Chaining
• Internal links may be selected from the individual’s
previously learned repertoire of language
Verbal Association
• Learning words that have several meaningMultiple
Discrimination
• Rules of syntax, rules of conversationConcept Learning
• Formation of linguistic systemPrinciple Learning
• Facing with sets of events that are truly problems to be
solved
Problem Solving
TRANSFER, INTERFERENCE AND
OVERGENERALIZATION
Transfer
Positive (+) Negative (-)
Overgeneralization Interference
(L1  L1)
(L2  L2)
(L1  L2)
(L2  L1)
 Transfer: the carryover of previous
performance or knowledge to subsequent
learning
positive transfer: the prior knowledge benefits
the learning task
negative transfer: previous performance
disrupts the performance of a second task
(Interference)
 Overgeneralization: meaningful learning,
items are subsumed (generalized) under
higher-order categories for meaningful
retention.
INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE
REASONING• one stores a number of
specific instances and
induces a general
law/rule/conclusion that
governs or subsumes
the specific instances
• Specific example 
general
INDUCTIVE
• Specific subsumed facts
are inferred or deduced
from a general principle
• General 
examples/activities
DEDUCTIVE
APTITUDE AND
INTELLIGENCE
APTITUDE
 Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT)
 Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB)
 Weakness:
- Learners can be successful for a multitude of reasons, many
of them are related to motivation and determination than
native abilities
- The test clearly biases both teachers and students, test-result
dependency that will affect their self confidence
 Today, the search for verifiable factors that make up aptitude is
headed to a broader spectrum of learner characteristics  bring
a question of intelligence and foreign language learning.
Steadily waned
due to their
weaknesses
INTELLIGENCE
• Linguistic
• Logical-mathematical
• Spatial
• Musical
Gardner (1983)
• Componential ability for analytical thinking
• Experiential ability to engage in creative
thinking
• Contextual ability to manipulate their
environment
Sternberg (1985)
• emotion at the highest level hierarchy of
human abilities.Goleman (1995)
• Bodily-kinesthetic
• Interpersonal
• intrapersonal
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE
AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
 Traditional Definition: intelligence may have little
to do with one’s success as a second language
learner; people with a high IQs have proven to be
more successful in acquiring second language.
 Gardner attaches other important notion of
intelligence:
 musical intelligence  intonation patterns of
language
 bodily-kinesthetic modes  phonology
 spatial intelligence  comfortable in second
language’s cultural environment
TEACHING METHODS
 Designer methods (David Nunan, 1989)
 recognized the importance of both cognitive and affective factors in
second language learning
 attempted to capitalize on the perceived importance of psychological
factors in language learner’s success
 Community Language Learning (LaForge, 1971)
 students and teacher join together to facilitate learning as a translator
 weakness: counselor teachers can become too nondirective and the
success of CLL depends on the translation expertise of the counselor
 Suggestopedia (Lozanov, 1979)
 music was the central to this method and the students were placed in a
comfortable rooms to make them suggestible
 weakness: music and comfortable seats
 The Silent Way (Calleb Gattegno)
1. Learning is facilitated if the learner discovers or creates
2. Learning is facilitated by accompanying physical objects
3. Learning is facilitated by problem solving involving the material to
be learned
Weakness: the teacher is too distant to encourage a communicative
atmosphere
 Total Physical Response (James Asher, 1977)
 students do listening and acting.
 TPR classes use imperative mood
 Weakness: only effective for beginner; lost its distinctiveness as
learners advanced their competence
 The Natural Approach (Krashen and Terrel, 1983)
 aimed at the goal of basic interpersonal communication skills, that is
everyday language situation.
 teachers provide comprehensible input or just a little beyond the
learner’s level.
 Weakness: raising students’ anxiety and lessening the possibility of
further risk-taking as the learners try to progress.
Thank you

Human learning theories

  • 1.
  • 2.
    OUTLINE LEARNING THEORIES TYPES OFLEARNING TRANSFER, INTERFERENCE, AND OVERGENERALIZATION INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING APTITUDE AND INTELLIGENCE TEACHING METHODS
  • 3.
    Points to Discuss How do human beings learn?  Can you mention some theories of learning?  Is one theory of learning “better” than another?
  • 4.
    DEFINITION  Learning theoriesare an organized set of principles explaining how individuals acquire, retain, and recall knowledge.  The principles of the theories can be used as guidelines to help select instructional tools, techniques and strategies that promote learning.
  • 5.
    LEARNING THEORIES BEHAVIORISM (PAVLOVAND SKINNER) MEANINGFUL LEARNING THEORY (AUSUBEL) HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY (ROGER)
  • 6.
    WHAT IS BEHAVIORISM? Behaviors can be measured, trained, and changed.  Behaviorists believe a person’s environment determines their behavior, that our responses to environmental stimuli shape our behaviors.  Learning as nothing more than the acquisition of new behavior based on environmental conditions.  Two kinds of conditioning; classical and operant
  • 9.
    Pavlov ‘s ClassicalConditioning  It occurs when a natural reflex responds to a stimulus.  Learning process : association between stimuli and reflex without punishment and reward  Experiments: A dog salivates to the sound of a bell (Reflex – unconditioned response – conditioned response)
  • 10.
    Skinner ‘s OperantConditioning  It occurs when a response to a stimulus is reinforced ( simple feedback system)  Learning process : If a reward or reinforcement follows the response to a stimulus, then the response becomes more probable in the future.  Consequences that reinforce the desired behavior are arranged to follow the desired behavior.  The new behavioral pattern can be repeated so it becomes automatic.
  • 12.
    BEHAVIORISM IN THE CLASSROOM Drilling  Repetitive practice  Bonus points (providing an incentive to do more)  Participation points (providing an incentive to participate)  Verbal Reinforcement (saying “good job”)  Giving weekly quizzes/tests  Using positive/negative reinforcement to encourage and reward students for good behavior and to punish bad behavior.
  • 13.
    Criticism towards Behaviorism Behaviorism does not prepare the learner for problem solving or creative thinking.  Learners do what they are told and do not take the initiative to change or improve things.  The learner is only prepared for recalling of basic facts, automatic responses or performing tasks.
  • 14.
    WHAT IS AUSUBEL’S MEANINGFULLEARNING THEORY?  It is based on aptitude and capacity to learn, learning styles, and it is also the basis of constructivism.  To learn meaningfully, individuals must relate new knowledge to relevant concepts they already know.  New knowledge must interact with the learner’s knowledge structure.  Understanding concepts, principles, and ideas are achieved through deductive reasoning.  Emphasizing on meaningful learning than rote learning
  • 15.
     A concernedwith how students learn large amounts of meaningful material from verbal/textual presentations in learning activities  Meaningful learning results when new information is acquired by linking the new information in the learner’s own cognitive structure MEANINGFUL LEARNING THEORY  A primary process in learning is subsumption in which new material is related to relevant ideas in the existing cognitive structure (prev knowlegde)
  • 16.
    Deductive Teaching Model Thepupils study specific examples The teacher presents examples The teacher explains important terms The teacher presents general statement or abstraction of lesson
  • 17.
    Rote vs MeaningfulLearning ROTE LEARNING  Little or no relevant knowledge  No emotional commitment to relate new with existing relevant knowledge  Poorly organized subject matter MEANINGFUL LEARNING  Relevant knowdlegde structures  Emotional commitment to integrate new with existing knowledge  Conceptual clear subject matter
  • 18.
    Cognitivism in theclassroom  Planning curriculum based on what students have already known and what they should learn  Giving problem-solving scenarios and real-life contexts for learning  Creating interesting and motivating lesson that engage students  Integrating visual, audio, and giving examples in lessons ((Examples: PowerPoint, songs, videos, realias, websites)
  • 19.
    Systematic Forgetting  Proactiveand retroactive inhibition  Cognitive pruning procedures (children’s concept of hotness)  Subsumption theory: the rejection of conditioning models  Systematic forgetting: EFL teachers may urge students to “forget” mechanical items as they make progress in a language, and to focus more on the communicative use of language
  • 20.
  • 21.
    ROGERS’S HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY -CONSTRUCTIVIST -  Roger’s humanistic psychology has affective focus more than cognitive one, thus it is a perspective of a constructivist learning.  Social and interactive nature of learning  The focus of constructivism is away from teaching and toward learning. The goal of education is the facilitation of change and learning.  Rogers is not as concerned about the actual cognitive process of learning because, for him, if the context for learning is properly created, then human beings will learn everything they need to.
  • 22.
    To do listfor teachers  Be real and genuine, discarding masks of superiority and omniscience  Have a genuine trust, acceptance and prizing of student as a valuable individual  Communicate openly and empathetically
  • 23.
    Important Clues toConstructivist  Fully functioning person; live at peace with all of their feelings and reactions; they able to reach their full potential  Learning how to learn is more important than being taught something from the superior vantage point of a teacher who unilaterally decides what shall be taught.  Community of learners: if the context for learning is properly created, then human beings will learn everything they need to  Empowerment of students in the classrooms: Students should be allowed to negotiate learning outcomes, to cooperate with teachers and other learners in a process of discovery, to engage critical thinking and to relate everything they do in school to their reality outside the classroom
  • 24.
    DEVELOPMENT OF ROGERSIAN TRADITION Paolo Freire (1970)  Inspiring many teachers to consider the empowerment of students in classroom  Students should be allowed to negotiate learning outcomes, to cooperate with teachers and other learners in a process of discovery, to engage critical thinking and to relate everything they do in school to their reality outside the classroom  Clarke (1990) Such liberationist views of educations should be approached with some caution, learners may nevertheless be empowered to achieve solutions to real problems in the real world
  • 25.
    WEAKNESS OF CONSTRUCTIVIST  Loosingtoo much time in the process of allowing students to discover facts and principles for themselves  A nonthreatening environment might become so non-threatening that the facilitative tension needed for learning is absent
  • 26.
    THEORIES OF LEARNINGBEHAVIORISTICCOGNITIVE CONSTRUCTIVIST Classical Operant (Pavlov) • Respondent conditioning • Elicited response • S  R (Skinner) • Governed by consequences • Emitted response • R  S (reward) • No punishment • Programmed instruction (Ausubel) • meaningful = powerful • Rote = weak • Subsumption • Association • Systematic forgetting • Cogntitive ‘pruning’ (Rogers) • Fully functioning person • Learn how to learn • Community of learners • empowerment Note: S : stimulus R: response, reward
  • 27.
    Types of learning Gagne (1965) identified 8 types of learning: • Signal learning • Stimulus-response learning • Chaining • Verbal association • Multiple discrimination Behaviorism Views • Concept learning • Principle learning • Problem solving Cognitive and Constructivist
  • 28.
    Second Language Learningin Gagne’s Types of Learning • Occurs in total language process; human beings make a general response of some kind to lang. Signal Learning • Acquisition of the sound system of a foreign languageStimulus-Response Learning • Acquisition of phonological sequences and syntactic patterns Chaining • Internal links may be selected from the individual’s previously learned repertoire of language Verbal Association • Learning words that have several meaningMultiple Discrimination • Rules of syntax, rules of conversationConcept Learning • Formation of linguistic systemPrinciple Learning • Facing with sets of events that are truly problems to be solved Problem Solving
  • 29.
    TRANSFER, INTERFERENCE AND OVERGENERALIZATION Transfer Positive(+) Negative (-) Overgeneralization Interference (L1  L1) (L2  L2) (L1  L2) (L2  L1)
  • 30.
     Transfer: thecarryover of previous performance or knowledge to subsequent learning positive transfer: the prior knowledge benefits the learning task negative transfer: previous performance disrupts the performance of a second task (Interference)  Overgeneralization: meaningful learning, items are subsumed (generalized) under higher-order categories for meaningful retention.
  • 31.
    INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING•one stores a number of specific instances and induces a general law/rule/conclusion that governs or subsumes the specific instances • Specific example  general INDUCTIVE • Specific subsumed facts are inferred or deduced from a general principle • General  examples/activities DEDUCTIVE
  • 32.
    APTITUDE AND INTELLIGENCE APTITUDE  ModernLanguage Aptitude Test (MLAT)  Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB)  Weakness: - Learners can be successful for a multitude of reasons, many of them are related to motivation and determination than native abilities - The test clearly biases both teachers and students, test-result dependency that will affect their self confidence  Today, the search for verifiable factors that make up aptitude is headed to a broader spectrum of learner characteristics  bring a question of intelligence and foreign language learning. Steadily waned due to their weaknesses
  • 33.
    INTELLIGENCE • Linguistic • Logical-mathematical •Spatial • Musical Gardner (1983) • Componential ability for analytical thinking • Experiential ability to engage in creative thinking • Contextual ability to manipulate their environment Sternberg (1985) • emotion at the highest level hierarchy of human abilities.Goleman (1995) • Bodily-kinesthetic • Interpersonal • intrapersonal
  • 34.
    RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE ANDSECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING  Traditional Definition: intelligence may have little to do with one’s success as a second language learner; people with a high IQs have proven to be more successful in acquiring second language.  Gardner attaches other important notion of intelligence:  musical intelligence  intonation patterns of language  bodily-kinesthetic modes  phonology  spatial intelligence  comfortable in second language’s cultural environment
  • 35.
    TEACHING METHODS  Designermethods (David Nunan, 1989)  recognized the importance of both cognitive and affective factors in second language learning  attempted to capitalize on the perceived importance of psychological factors in language learner’s success  Community Language Learning (LaForge, 1971)  students and teacher join together to facilitate learning as a translator  weakness: counselor teachers can become too nondirective and the success of CLL depends on the translation expertise of the counselor  Suggestopedia (Lozanov, 1979)  music was the central to this method and the students were placed in a comfortable rooms to make them suggestible  weakness: music and comfortable seats
  • 36.
     The SilentWay (Calleb Gattegno) 1. Learning is facilitated if the learner discovers or creates 2. Learning is facilitated by accompanying physical objects 3. Learning is facilitated by problem solving involving the material to be learned Weakness: the teacher is too distant to encourage a communicative atmosphere  Total Physical Response (James Asher, 1977)  students do listening and acting.  TPR classes use imperative mood  Weakness: only effective for beginner; lost its distinctiveness as learners advanced their competence  The Natural Approach (Krashen and Terrel, 1983)  aimed at the goal of basic interpersonal communication skills, that is everyday language situation.  teachers provide comprehensible input or just a little beyond the learner’s level.  Weakness: raising students’ anxiety and lessening the possibility of further risk-taking as the learners try to progress.
  • 37.