Khóa luận tốt nghiệp Quản trị kinh doanh: Hoàn thiện công tác đào tạo nguồn nhân lực tại công ty TNHH MTV xi măng Sông Gianh cho các bạn làm luận văn tham khảo

1. --- ---
– QTKDTH
Niên khóa: 2010 - 2014

2. TNHH MTV

3. STT
1 CB
2 CTCP
3
4
5 TCNS
6 TNHH MTV
7 TSDH
8

4. 1
4.
D
1.1.1 K ,
1.1.1.1 K
1.1.1.2 K
1.1.1.3 M

5. -2013

6. Công ty
Sông Gianh.
-2013
ng nhân viên
GIANH.
-2015)
GIANH.

7. 3.3.5

8. ...............................21
................................................................................35
........................56
.....................................................................................................56
...............................................................60
............................................................60
.............................................................61
................................................................62

9. -2013 .............40
2011-2013......................................................................................................................46
..................................48
...............49
2011. ..............................................................................................................................51
2012. ..............................................................................................................................52
.....................................53
....................................................................................53
13............................................................................54
...............63
..................................................................................................................64
.................................................64
.........................................................................................64
.................................................................................................................................65
......................66
.................................................................................................................67
.............................................................................69
..........................................................................................................71
....................................................................................................73
..............76
.....................................................................................77

10. Khóa lu
1
V
– - QTKDTH

11. Khóa lu
Công ty TNHH MTV x rong
công
khô
ty TNHH
M ”
- H
- P
– - QTKDTH

12. Khóa lu
- TV xi
- Rút r
ng
ty TNHH M nh.
-
-
P
-
nhân viên và
+ G
– - QTKDTH

13. Khóa lu
ông ty.
k
- th
- - .
-
-
air &
– - QTKDTH

14. Khóa lu
quan sá
n =
5%
c p = 26/30 = 0,87; q =1-0,87 = 0,13. S
ân viên
-
Trong n
* K
ông
là
– - QTKDTH

15. Khóa lu
H0: M
H1
Trình bày lý d
- T
-
- Q
.
-
TNHH M
– - QTKDTH

16. Khóa lu
- X i.
ng
TNHH M Sông Gianh.
– - QTKDTH

17. Khóa lu
1.1.1 K , c
1.1.1.1 K
T
T
- T
-
- N
tác
- N mà
&
n sàng tham gia
V
– - QTKDTH

18. Khóa lu
T
1.1.1.2 K
- L
- L
T
phát V
1.1.1.3 M
– - QTKDTH

19. Khóa lu
ng do các
- T
- C
-
- G
- H
- C
- T
– - QTKDTH

20. Khóa lu
u dù
ng trình
oanh
* Nhân t
– - QTKDTH

21. Khóa lu
-
*
-
t
ào
o cao thì nhu
– - QTKDTH

22. Khóa lu
C
-
-
-
– - QTKDTH

23. Khóa lu
,
*
và có
nhân
nghi
– - QTKDTH

24. Khóa lu
- N
- G
- P
- P
cho nhân
- K
– - QTKDTH

25. Khóa lu
- K
-
* Luân ch
Luân ch
- L
- N
- L
m: G
t.
– - QTKDTH

26. Khóa lu
g. C
c
chính quy
Ngành h
Trong
– - QTKDTH

27. Khóa lu
tham gia.
*
- T
- M
- g trình.
ng pháp này
P
gian. P
– - QTKDTH

28. Khóa lu
Internet,...C
giúp cho
* Mô hình hoá hành vi
này giúp cho
lý
– - QTKDTH

29. Khóa lu
kinh doanh.
– - QTKDTH

30. Khóa lu
c
- P
- P
- Phân tích nhân viên.
* P
– - QTKDTH

31. Khóa lu
ng
bên ngoài n
c
* P
Phân tí b
P
– - QTKDTH

32. Khóa lu
tính
* P
.
1.
-
thành
– - QTKDTH

33. Khóa lu
-
-
1.1
bao lâu.
- T
- T
– - QTKDTH

34. Khóa lu
Tro
hi phí
- C
- C
- C
-
1.1.5.6
ng
iên
– - QTKDTH

35. Khóa lu
.
có
P
-
– - QTKDTH

36. Khóa lu
- P
- P
T
v
chính sách khu
-
nghi
n
– - QTKDTH

37. Khóa lu
- C ng tác
- C
- S
-
- D
ng mang
- T
– - QTKDTH

38. Khóa lu
-
- C
. T
-
-
o phép các công
nhau trong quá trình
– - QTKDTH

39. Khóa lu
-
T
các t
gh
Sam Sung, Hyundai,….
- G
ông
- Giáo
- G
– - QTKDTH

40. Khóa lu
=> T
-
doanh.
- C
- P
– - QTKDTH

41. Khóa lu
2.1
Tên công ty: Công ty TN
CEMENT CO.,LTD
Fax: 0523.535.571
(1) S n xu
(2) S n xu t bê tông và các s n ph m t ch cao
(3) Khai thác t sét
(4) V n t i hàng hóa b ng b
(5) V n t ng th y n a
(6) V n t i hàng hóa ven bi n và vi
(7) S n xu t và kinh doanh v
-
-TTG ngày 24/4/2001 do
– - QTKDTH

42. Khóa lu
- N
- N
01.2002/COSEVCO- Polysius.AG
ng
- Ngày 27/10/2005 các chuyên gia Polysius
2.1.1.2 Gia
Ng
-
– - QTKDTH

43. Khóa lu
- Ngày 1 c trung tâm
-
-
-
-
C
-
môn
và N
hóa các do
– - QTKDTH

44. Khóa lu
-
-
h.
2.1
công ty
P.Px
clinker
Px
xi
P. tài
chính
toán
Px
clinker
P.
K
C
S
P.
công
Ban
an
toàn
và
môi
P.
hành
chính
nhân
Px
phòng
công
trung
tâm
soát viên
– - QTKDTH

45. Khóa lu
-
;
-
thành viên;
-
thành viên;
-
-
ng ty.
*
*
*
,
, l
.
-
*
– - QTKDTH

46. Khóa lu
n
N
,
,
*
KCS.
.
*
– - QTKDTH

47. Khóa lu
Có
* Phòng tài chính –
-
– - QTKDTH

48. Khóa lu
:
-
- Clinker
2.
.
2. n
Ta
– - QTKDTH

49. Khóa lu
ng 2.1: T -2013
( )
Stt C
% % %
A 2.733.101 100 2.389.847 100 2.248.001 100
I 619.916 22,68 465.529 19,48 523.821 23,3
1 325.160 11,89 45.738 1,91 174.285 7,75
2 70.401 2,58 108.258 4,53 99.393 4,42
3 222.494 8,14 308.371 12,91 248.265 11,04
4 TSNH khác 1.861 0,07 3.162 0,13 1.878 0,08
II TSDH 2.133.771 77,32 1.924.318 80,52 1.724.180 76,7
1 2.110.645 77,23 1.922.132 80,43 1.721.276 76,57
2 TSDH khác 2.540 0,09 2.186 0,09 2.904 0,13
B 2.733.101 100 2.389.847 100 2.248.001 100
I 2.255.376 82,52 1.591.892 66,61 1.390.528 61,68
1 970.973 35,52 684.842 28,66 762.210 33,91
2 1.284.583 47,00 907.050 37,95 628.318 27,95
II 477.725 17,8 797.955 33,39 857.473 38,14
nh - )
– - QTKDTH

50. Khóa lu
* D
* Lò nung
. Vòi
* M
* M
hãng HAVER-
/h có
* H
-
ISO/IEC 17205:2005- -
1997, ASTM.
– - QTKDTH

51. Khóa lu
+
.
y 20km
2 - 50mm.
-94.
+
.
2.1.4.1
2.1.4.1.1
hanh,
– - QTKDTH

52. Khóa lu
-
-2005.
ông ty TNHH MTV xi
cho
2.1.4.1.2
POL
ông ty
2.1.4.1.3
ông ty TNHH
– - QTKDTH

53. Khóa lu
quá trình khai thác các nguyên
* T
2.1.4.1.4
ông ty TNHH
2.1.4.2 M
2.1.4.2.1 Khách hàng
khách hàng
. Vì th
. Tro
C
-
– - QTKDTH

54. Khóa lu
2.1.4.2.2
Ng
ông ty Công ty
các C , xi
, x
tranh
2.1.4.2.3
C
ông ty
các nhà
+
+ , .
y 20km
N
-
– - QTKDTH

55. Khóa lu
+ ông ty kinh do
a nhà máy.
2.1.5. A CÔNG TY
-2013
2.2: K
-2013.
kinh
doanh
2011 2012 2013
+/- % +/- %
DTT 1.046.943 1.070.061 1.230.035 23.118 2,2 159.974 14,9
TNDN
8.786 28.086 12.752 19.300 3196 -15.334 0,4
sách
26.755 28.915 23.291 2160 8,07 -5.624 0,5
– - QTKDTH

56. Khóa lu
2.2
N
ông ty TNHH MTV xi
2.2
ty TNHH MTV xi
– - QTKDTH

57. Khóa lu
2.3
2012
SL % SL % SL %
2012/2011 2013/2012
SL % SL %
689 100 636 100 536 100 (53) (7,7) 100 (15,8)
148 21,4 142 22,3 102 19,0 (6) (4,1) (40) (28,2)
541 78,6 494 77,7 434 81,0 (53) (8,7) (60) (12,2)
18- 156 22,6 142 22,3 134 25 (14) (9) (8) (5,7)
26- 394 57,1 321 50,4 290 54,1 (73) (18,6) (31) (9,7)
36- 101 14,6 130 20,4 60 11,1 (29) 28,7 (70) (53,85)
Trên 45 38 5,7 43 6,9 52 9,8 8 13,15 9 20,9
nam là 434 công nhân
g
Q - ây là
ông ty.
– - QTKDTH

58. Khóa lu
2.2.1.2
2.4
2011 2012 2013
SL % SL % SL %
2012/2011 2013/2012
SL % SL %
689 100 636 100 536 100 (53) (7,7) (100) (15,8)
593 86,0 565 88,8 480 89,5 (28) (4,8) (85) (5,1)
96 14,0 71 11,2 56 10,5 (25) (26,1) (15) (21,2)
c,
217 31,5 202 31,7 173 32,2 (15) (7) (29) (14,4)
64 9,2 59 9,2 44 8,2 (5) (8) (15) (25,5)
336 48,7 305 48 271 50,5 (31) (9,3) (34) (11,2)
thông
72 10,6 70 11,1 48 9,1 (2) (2,8) (22) (31,5)
- cao t
này l
– - QTKDTH

59. Khóa lu
- L
201
.
C
tr ao
2.2.2.
Sông Gianh.
-2013:
– - QTKDTH

60. Khóa lu
2.2.2.1
-2013
2.5
pháp
tham
gia
Kinh phí
gian
(ngày)
11 3,2 1
318 15,0 1
doanh
52 106,902 180
68 30,520 180
19 4,250 3
2 6,0 30
các
trung tâm
2 12 30
3 36
1 12
225,872
– - QTKDTH

61. Khóa lu
2.6
tham gia
Kinh phí
(ngày)
44 17,0 1
cháy
62 4,96 1
17 6 3
12 4,6 2
doanh
29 110 90
7 11,26 10
10 11 20
trung tâm
phân tích khí
5 25,75 90
17025
1 5,67 30
2 11,2 30
205,44
– - QTKDTH

62. Khóa lu
2.7
3.
Các khóa
tham gia
Kinh phí
gian
(ngày)
112 57,389 4
55 7,89 2
44 4,250 2
27 12,937 1
27 12,937 1
viên
28 27,384 1
111 50,145 1
phòng
20 11,060 2
12 14,4 90
27 24 10
20 21 30
trung tâm
8 24 15
20 120 30
2 24 60
15 15 30
398,992
– - QTKDTH

63. Khóa lu
2.8: So sánh t
trong 3 2011, 2012, 2013.
329 135 424
3 4 9
2 4 10
Chi phí trung bình cho 1
5,73 8,14 20,44
trung tâm
6 8 45
10 5,3 4,06
doanh
141 46 59
4 3 3
4 3 3
Chi phí trung bình cho 1
36,9 44,08 27,8
cho nhân viên.
– - QTKDTH

64. Khóa lu
. Chi phí cho
– - QTKDTH

65. Khóa lu
2.2
Gianh.
CB
CB ,
phòng TCNS
toán
,phòng
TCNS
Phòng TCNS
Xem xét,phân
tích
– - QTKDTH

66. Khóa lu
– - QTKDTH

67. Khóa lu
viên có
a doanh
Ngoài ra, xem xét c
có
– - QTKDTH

68. Khóa lu
sau.
m
danh sách nhân viên công ty.
K
= 536/ 174
ông ty cung
– - QTKDTH

69. Khóa lu
* C
(
* C
– - QTKDTH

70. Khóa lu
-
* C công tác
- kinh
- -
tài chính-
Phòng hành chính - lao
-
– - QTKDTH

71. Khóa lu
Ta có )
2.2.3.2 s Alpha
i
– - QTKDTH

72. Khóa lu
K
2.9 Alpha
Cronbach’s
xuyên
0,649 -
0,649 -
Cronbach’s Alpha = 0,787
Cronbach’s Alpha
– - QTKDTH

73. Khóa lu
2.10
Cronbach’s
0.515 0,694
0.547 0,680,
0,546 0,675
0,538 0,680
Cronbach’s Alpha = 0,741
2.11
.
Cronbach’s
0,658 0,843
0,805 0,780
0,736 0,698
0,636 0,630
Cronbach’s Alpha = 0,861
– - QTKDTH

74. Khóa lu
Cronbach’s Alpha
2.12
.
Cronbach’s Alpha
0,622 0,772
0,602 0,871
0,802 0,849
0,752 0,854
0,735 0,856
mình
0,580 0,872
0,485 0,880
0,579 0,873
Cronbach’s Alpha = 0,881
Cronbach’s Alpha
– - QTKDTH

75. Khóa lu
2.13
Cronbach’s Alpha
0,515 0,688
0,533 0,692
Nhìn chung anh
0,669 0,624
0,468 0,714
Cronbach’s Alpha = 0,738
Cronbach’s Alpha
2.2.3.3
2.2.3.3 ánh
H0 ánh giá
H1 ánh giá 4
công ty TNHH MTV x
có tính
– - QTKDTH

76. Khóa lu
2.14 :
“ ”
One sample t-test
trung bình
sát
3,94 4 0,409
4,94 4 0,000
Nhìn chung
4,13 4 0,130
– 5 –
“ xuyên”, “
g là 0,000 0, d
nhân viên. T
– - QTKDTH

77. Khóa lu
tùy theo
-
-
-
2.2.3.3
H0
= 4
H1
4
– - QTKDTH

78. Khóa lu
ty
2.17 :
“ ng viê
One sample t-test trung
bình sát
3,94 4 0,000
4,01 4 0,841
3,99 4 0,934
4,07 4 0,325
3,98 4 0,742
– 5 – hoàn toàn
“GV luôn
– - QTKDTH

79. Khóa lu
934;0,325
0
2.2.3.3 c
H0
H1: c 4
N
– - QTKDTH

80. Khóa lu
2.20:
“ ”
One sample t-test trung
bình sát
3,88 4 0,000
4,5 4 0,000
lý
4,57 4 0,000
4,66 4 0,046
4,14 4 0,002
– 5 –
0,05
” có giá
trung bình là 3,88 giá t
, nhân viên trong công
– - QTKDTH

81. Khóa lu
”.
2.2.3.3.4
H0
H1 4
-
không?
-
nào?
– - QTKDTH

82. Khóa lu
2.23:
“
One sample t-test trung
bình sát
3,88 4 0,046
3,88 4 0,046
3,49 4 0,001
3,56 4 0,000
3,44 4 0,000
3,39 4 0,000
3,68 4 0,000
gian
3,95 4 0,373
4,07 4 0,249
– 5 –
Anh
gian”, “ ”
a
– - QTKDTH

83. Khóa lu
0
.
hoàn
H0: M
H1
ANOVA
o, Cách
– - QTKDTH

84. Khóa lu
là
2.2.3.4
-
– - QTKDTH

85. Khóa lu
Theo
2.26: N
77 44,3
73 42
Không có 24 13,8
174 100
nhu
nhân viên và
– - QTKDTH

86. Khóa lu
B 2.27: T nhân viên Công ty TNHH
ianh
4 2,3
51 29,3
100 57,5
8 4,6
11 9,3
174 100
tuy nhiên khi nhân
.
– - QTKDTH

87. Khóa lu
3.1.1
3.1.1.1 4-2015)
linker
3.1.1.2 M
C
C
C
C
Sôn C
C Công ty này
– - QTKDTH

88. Khóa lu
-
Công ty là các nhà
hà C
- N
nhu c
C
3.1.2 Ch
3.1.2.1 C
3.1.2.2 C
C
C
– - QTKDTH

89. Khóa lu
3.1.2.3
:
- H
, .
-
.
- nhan
viên
th .
-
–
-
-
-
-
.
-
– - QTKDTH

90. Khóa lu
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
môi
-
– - QTKDTH

91. Khóa lu
3.
C
C
g
3.2.3 Do
C
C
Công ty.
C
– - QTKDTH

92. Khóa lu
C
C
NG SÔNG GIANH
.
thì nhân
-
– - QTKDTH

93. Khóa lu
-
-
y
– - QTKDTH

94. Khóa lu
Gianh “
.
-
-
xem xé
– - QTKDTH

95. Khóa lu
-
ch
công ty T
-
– - QTKDTH

96. Khóa lu
công nhân yên tâm
-
ã
– - QTKDTH

97. Khóa lu
I
mean = 4,14/5.
ty
– - QTKDTH

98. Khóa lu
-
-
-
n
-
-
– - QTKDTH

99. Khóa lu
-
– - QTKDTH

100. Khóa lu
1. , Q
2.
3.
4. – ,
-
5.http://doc.edu.vn/tai-lieu/de-tai-hoan-thien-cong-tac-dao-tao-va-phat-
trien-nguon-nhan-luc-tai-cong-ty-co-phan-bao-hiem-petrolimex-20908/
– - QTKDTH

101. Khóa lu
-
TNHH ”.
Câu 1:X
1. …………………………………………
2. Nam
18 - 26 -
36 -
4. – kinh doanh
– tài chính
Phòng hành chính – –
Nhân viên hành chính
Khác
– - QTKDTH

102. Khóa lu
Câu 2
1………………………………… ….………………………
2………………………………… ………………………….
Câu 3
3 - 6 tháng
Câu 4
quy
Khác……………
Câu 5
Không
Câu 6
1
1.1 1 2 3 4 5
1.2 1 2 3 4 5
2
2.1 1 2 3 4 5
2.2 1 2 3 4 5
2.3 1 2 3 4 5
2.4 1 2 3 4 5
3
3.1 1 2 3 4 5
3.2 1 2 3 4 5
3.3 1 2 3 4 5
3.4 1 2 3 4 5
4
4.1 1 2 3 4 5
4.2 1 2 3 4 5
4.3 1 2 3 4 5
4.4. 1 2 3 4 5
4.5 1 2 3 4 5
– - QTKDTH

103. Khóa lu
4.6 1 2 3 4 5
4.7 1 2 3 4 5
4.8 1 2 3 4 5
5
5.1 1 2 3 4 5
5.2 1 2 3 4 5
5.3 1 2 3 4 5
5.4 1 2 3 4 5
Câu 7:
Câu 8
Khác…
Câu 9
Khác………………….
Câu 10
Câu 11
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………….……
Xi
– - QTKDTH

104. Khóa lu
II
SPSS
2.1 TH NG KÊ MÔ T
2.1.1
gioi tinh khach hang
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Nam 123 70.7 70.7 70.7
Nu 51 29.3 29.3 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
2.1.2 Tu i khách hàng.
Tuoi
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid 18 den 25 3 1.7 1.7 1.7
26 den 35 135 77.6 77.6 79.3
36 den 45 32 18.4 18.4 97.7
tren 45 4 2.3 2.3 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
2.1.3 n v công tác
don vi cong tac
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid phong ke hoach - kinh
doanh
35 20.1 20.1 20.1
phong ke toan - tai chinh 16 9.2 9.2 29.3
phong hanh chinh - lao dong
- tong hop
38 21.8 21.8 51.1
xuong san xuat 85 48.9 48.9 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
2.1.2 Ch c v
chuc vu
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid cong nhan lam viec tai
xuong
92 52.9 52.9 52.9
nhan vien quan li 36 20.7 20.7 73.6
nhan vien hanh chinh 46 26.4 26.4 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
– - QTKDTH

105. Khóa lu
2.1.3 Th i gian o t o
thoi gian dao tao
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid duoi 3 thang 131 75.3 75.3 75.3
3 den 6 thang 30 17.2 17.2 92.5
6 thang den 1 nam 3 1.7 1.7 94.3
tren 1 nam 10 5.7 5.7 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
2.1.4 Nh ng hình th c ã c áp d ng o t o
hinh thuc chi dan cong viec
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Co 3 1.7 1.7 1.7
khong 171 98.3 98.3 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
hinh thuc cu di hoc tai truong chinh quy
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Co 16 9.2 9.2 9.2
khong 158 90.8 90.8 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
hinh thuc dao tao tu xa
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Co 7 4.0 4.0 4.0
khong 167 96.0 96.0 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
hinh thuc mo lop canh doanh nghiep
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Co 24 13.8 13.8 13.8
khong 150 86.2 86.2 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
hinh thuc hoi nghi, hoi thao
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Co 143 82.2 82.2 82.2
khong 31 17.8 17.8 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
– - QTKDTH

106. Khóa lu
2.1.5 o
chi phi dao tao
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid khong 160 92.0 92.0 92.0
dong mot phan 14 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
2.1.6 Nhu c o th i gian t i
nhu cau dao tao thoi gian toi
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid rat can 77 44.3 44.3 44.3
tuy theo chuong trinh dao
tao cua cong ty
73 42.0 42.0 86.2
khong co nhu cau dao tao 24 13.8 13.8 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
2.1.7 Mong mu o nào.
mong muon phuong phap dao tao
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid chi dan cong viec 4 2.3 2.3 2.3
dao tao tu xa 8 4.6 4.6 6.9
cu di hoc tai cac truong
trung tam
51 29.3 29.3 36.2
hoi nghi hoi thao 11 6.3 6.3 42.5
mo lop canh doanh nghiep 100 57.5 57.5 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
2.1.8 Nhu c u o t o v ki n th c nào.
nhu cau dao tao ve kien thuc nao
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid nang cao kien thuc chuyen
mon
100 57.5 57.5 57.5
dao tao ve tin hoc tieng anh 25 14.4 14.4 71.8
mo rong chuyen mon 49 28.2 28.2 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
2.1.9 S n sàng tr m t ph t o.
san sang chi tra phi dao tao
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid luon san sang 119 68.4 68.4 68.4
khong san sang 55 31.6 31.6 100.0
Total 174 100.0 100.0
– - QTKDTH

107. Khóa lu
2.2
*
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.787 2
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total
Correlation(
)
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
noi dung dao tao phu hop
mong muon
4.48 .482 .649 .
a
chuong trinh dao tao cap
nhat thuong xuyen
4.24 .427 .649 .
a
*
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.741 4
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
phuong phap dao tao phu
hop voi anh (chi)
12.07 4.174 .515 .694
giang vien truyen dat tot 12.01 4.607 .547 .680
giang vien co kien thuc
chuyen mon sau rong
12.02 4.104 .546 .675
giang vien luon san sang
giai dap thac mac
11.95 4.084 .538 .680
* Cách th c t ch c khoa h c
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.861 4
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
co day du thiet bi giang day 13.73 2.337 .658 .843
duoc cung cap day du tai
lieu ve chuong trinh hoc
13.82 2.043 .805 .780
thoi gian dao tao duoc bo tri
hop li
13.75 2.222 .736 .811
dia diem dao tao thuan tien
cho di lai
13.66 2.433 .636 .851
– - QTKDTH

108. Khóa lu
*
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.881 8
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
co them nhieu thong tin kien
thuc moi
25.69 17.221 .622 .868
co them tu tin de lam viec 25.78 17.042 .602 .871
có phuong phap lam viec
moi hieu qua hon
26.01 15.988 .802 .849
hoan thanh cong viec
nhanh, hieu qua hon
26.13 16.046 .752 .854
co kha nang tu giam sat
cong viec cua minh
26.18 16.402 .735 .856
nang luc chuyen mon duoc
cai thien ro ret
25.89 17.832 .580 .872
chuong trinh dao tao xung
dang voi chi phi tien va thoi
gian
25.61 18.631 .485 .880
hoc duoc nhieu ki nang moi,
hieu ro hon cong viec
25.69 17.475 .579 .873
*
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.738 4
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
danh gia hai long ve chuong
trinh dao tao
12.18 3.319 .515 .688
danh gia hai long ve cach
thuc to chuc khoa hoc
12.17 3.273 .669 .624
danh gia hai long ve doi ngu
giang vien va phuong phap
dao tao
12.35 2.657 .533 .692
danh gia hai long ve ket qua
dao tao
12.21 3.209 .468 .714
– - QTKDTH

109. Khóa lu
2.3. One-
2.3.1 Nhóm nhân t 1
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
phuong phap dao tao phu
hop voi anh (chi)
174 3.94 .917 .070
noi dung dao tao phu hop
mong muon
174 4.24 .653 .050
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 4
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
95% Confidence Interval of
the Difference
Lower Upper
phuong phap dao tao
phu hop voi anh (chi)
-.827 173 .409 -.057 -.19 .08
noi dung dao tao phu
hop mong muon
4.873 173 .000 .241 .14 .34
2.3.2 Nhóm nhân t 2
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
giang vien truyen dat tot 174 4.01 .753 .057
giang vien co kien thuc
chuyen mon sau rong
174 3.99 .909 .069
giang vien luon san sang giai
dap thac mac
174 4.07 .922 .070
co day du thiet bi giang day 174 4.59 .579 .044
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 4
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
95% Confidence Interval of
the Difference
Lower Upper
giang vien truyen dat tot .201 173 .841 .011 -.10 .12
giang vien co kien thuc
chuyen mon sau rong
-.083 173 .934 -.006 -.14 .13
giang vien luon san sang
giai dap thac mac
.986 173 .325 .069 -.07 .21
co day du thiet bi giang
day
13.482 173 .000 .592 .51 .68
2.3.3 Nhóm nhân t 3
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
duoc cung cap day du tai lieu
ve chuong trinh hoc
174 4.50 .615 .047
thoi gian dao tao duoc bo tri
hop li
174 4.57 .582 .044
dia diem dao tao thuan tien
cho di lai
174 4.66 .553 .042
co them nhieu thong tin kien
thuc moi
174 3.88 .792 .060
– - QTKDTH

110. Khóa lu
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 4
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
95% Confidence Interval of
the Difference
Lower Upper
duoc cung cap day du
tai lieu ve chuong trinh
hoc
10.719 173 .000 .500 .41 .59
thoi gian dao tao duoc
bo tri hop li
12.887 173 .000 .569 .48 .66
dia diem dao tao thuan
tien cho di lai
15.752 173 .000 .661 .58 .74
co them nhieu thong tin
kien thuc moi
-2.011 173 .046 -.121 -.24 .00
2.3.4 Nhóm nhân t 4
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
co them nhieu thong tin kien thuc
moi
174 3.88 .792 .060
hoc duoc nhieu ki nang moi, hieu
ro hon cong viec
174 3.88 .792 .060
co them tu tin de lam viec 174 3.79 .842 .064
có phuong phap lam viec moi hieu
qua hon
174 3.56 .822 .062
hoan thanh cong viec nhanh, hieu
qua hon
174 3.44 .856 .065
co kha nang tu giam sat cong viec
cua minh
174 3.39 .817 .062
nang luc chuyen mon duoc cai
thien ro ret
174 3.68 .729 .055
chuong trinh dao tao xung dang voi
chi phi tien va thoi gian
174 3.95 .678 .051
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 4
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
95% Confidence Interval of
the Difference
Lower Upper
co them nhieu thong tin
kien thuc moi
-2.011 173 .046 -.121 -.24 .00
hoc duoc nhieu ki nang
moi, hieu ro hon cong
viec
-2.011 173 .046 -.121 -.24 .00
co them tu tin de lam
viec
-3.243 173 .001 -.207 -.33 -.08
có phuong phap lam
viec moi hieu qua hon
-7.100 173 .000 -.443 -.57 -.32
hoan thanh cong viec
nhanh, hieu qua hon
-8.678 173 .000 -.563 -.69 -.44
co kha nang tu giam sat
cong viec cua minh
-9.838 173 .000 -.609 -.73 -.49
nang luc chuyen mon
duoc cai thien ro ret
-5.822 173 .000 -.322 -.43 -.21
chuong trinh dao tao
xung dang voi chi phi
tien va thoi gian
-.894 173 .373 -.046 -.15 .06
– - QTKDTH

111. Khóa lu
2.3.5 Nhóm nhân t 5
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
danh gia hai long ve chuong
trinh dao tao
174 4.13 .668 .051
danh gia hai long ve cach
thuc to chuc khoa hoc
174 4.14 .605 .046
danh gia hai long ve doi ngu
giang vien va phuong phap
dao tao
174 3.98 .918 .070
danh gia hai long ve ket qua
dao tao
174 4.07 .787 .060
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 4
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
95% Confidence Interval of
the Difference
Lower Upper
danh gia hai long ve
chuong trinh dao tao
2.496 173 .013 .126 .03 .23
danh gia hai long ve
cach thuc to chuc khoa
hoc
3.131 173 .002 .144 .05 .23
danh gia hai long ve doi
ngu giang vien va
phuong phap dao tao
-.330 173 .742 -.023 -.16 .11
danh gia hai long ve ket
qua dao tao
1.156 173 .249 .069 -.05 .19
2.4. ANOVA
2.4.1
2.4.1.1 o
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
chuong trinh dao tao cap nhat
thuong xuyen
.221 3 170 .882
noi dung dao tao phu hop
mong muon
.212 3 170 .888
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
chuong trinh dao tao cap
nhat thuong xuyen
Between Groups 1.247 3 .416 .860 .463
Within Groups 82.201 170 .484
Total 83.448 173
noi dung dao tao phu hop
mong muon
Between Groups .769 3 .256 .597 .618
Within Groups 73.093 170 .430
Total 73.862 173
– - QTKDTH

112. Khóa lu
2.4.1.2
Descriptives
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
phuong phap dao tao phu hop voi
anh (chi)
.370 3 170 .774
giang vien truyen dat tot 1.168 3 170 .324
giang vien co kien thuc chuyen mon
sau rong
1.099 3 170 .351
giang vien luon san sang giai dap
thac mac
.404 3 170 .750
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
phuong phap dao tao phu
hop voi anh (chi)
Between Groups 5.319 3 1.773 2.151 .096
Within Groups 140.106 170 .824
Total 145.425 173
giang vien truyen dat tot Between Groups .621 3 .207 .361 .781
Within Groups 97.356 170 .573
Total 97.977 173
giang vien co kien thuc
chuyen mon sau rong
Between Groups 1.616 3 .539 .648 .585
Within Groups 141.378 170 .832
Total 142.994 173
giang vien luon san sang
giai dap thac mac
Between Groups 1.778 3 .593 .693 .558
Within Groups 145.395 170 .855
Total 147.172 173
cách th c
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
co day du thiet bi giang day .413 3 170 .744
duoc cung cap day du tai lieu ve
chuong trinh hoc
11.462 3 170 .000
thoi gian dao tao duoc bo tri hop li .617 3 170 .605
dia diem dao tao thuan tien cho di lai .128 3 170 .943
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
co day du thiet bi giang
day
Between Groups .051 3 .017 .050 .985
Within Groups 57.978 170 .341
Total 58.029 173
duoc cung cap day du tai
lieu ve chuong trinh hoc
Between Groups 1.127 3 .376 .992 .398
Within Groups 64.373 170 .379
Total 65.500 173
thoi gian dao tao duoc bo
tri hop li
Between Groups .704 3 .235 .688 .561
Within Groups 57.969 170 .341
Total 58.672 173
dia diem dao tao thuan
tien cho di lai
Between Groups 1.043 3 .348 1.138 .335
Within Groups 51.951 170 .306
– - QTKDTH

113. Khóa lu
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
co day du thiet bi giang
day
Between Groups .051 3 .017 .050 .985
Within Groups 57.978 170 .341
Total 58.029 173
duoc cung cap day du tai
lieu ve chuong trinh hoc
Between Groups 1.127 3 .376 .992 .398
Within Groups 64.373 170 .379
Total 65.500 173
thoi gian dao tao duoc bo
tri hop li
Between Groups .704 3 .235 .688 .561
Within Groups 57.969 170 .341
Total 58.672 173
dia diem dao tao thuan
tien cho di lai
Between Groups 1.043 3 .348 1.138 .335
Within Groups 51.951 170 .306
Total 52.994 173
2.4.1.4 o
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
co them nhieu thong tin kien thuc moi 4.511 3 170 .005
hoc duoc nhieu ki nang moi, hieu ro
hon cong viec
2.639 3 170 .051
co them tu tin de lam viec .326 3 170 .806
có phuong phap lam viec moi hieu
qua hon
.072 3 170 .975
hoan thanh cong viec nhanh, hieu
qua hon
1.803 3 170 .149
co kha nang tu giam sat cong viec
cua minh
1.314 3 170 .271
nang luc chuyen mon duoc cai thien
ro ret
1.996 3 170 .116
chuong trinh dao tao xung dang voi
chi phi tien va thoi gian
1.614 3 170 .188
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
co them nhieu thong tin
kien thuc moi
Between Groups 1.487 3 .496 .788 .502
Within Groups 106.979 170 .629
Total 108.466 173
hoc duoc nhieu ki nang
moi, hieu ro hon cong
viec
Between Groups .582 3 .194 .306 .821
Within Groups 107.884 170 .635
Total 108.466 173
co them tu tin de lam viec Between Groups 2.281 3 .760 1.075 .361
Within Groups 120.270 170 .707
Total 122.552 173
có phuong phap lam viec
moi hieu qua hon
Between Groups 1.650 3 .550 .811 .489
Within Groups 115.275 170 .678
Total 116.925 173
hoan thanh cong viec
nhanh, hieu qua hon
Between Groups .987 3 .329 .445 .721
Within Groups 125.818 170 .740
– - QTKDTH

114. Khóa lu
Total 126.805 173
co kha nang tu giam sat
cong viec cua minh
Between Groups 2.197 3 .732 1.100 .351
Within Groups 113.228 170 .666
Total 115.425 173
nang luc chuyen mon
duoc cai thien ro ret
Between Groups .543 3 .181 .337 .799
Within Groups 91.434 170 .538
Total 91.977 173
chuong trinh dao tao
xung dang voi chi phi tien
va thoi gian
Between Groups 1.209 3 .403 .874 .456
Within Groups 78.423 170 .461
Total 79.632 173
2.4.2 Theo n v công tác
2.4.2.1
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
chuong trinh dao tao cap nhat thuong
xuyen
1.311 3 170 .272
noi dung dao tao phu hop mong
muon
1.136 3 170 .336
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
chuong trinh dao tao cap
nhat thuong xuyen
Between Groups 2.262 3 .754 1.579 .196
Within Groups 81.186 170 .478
Total 83.448 173
noi dung dao tao phu hop
mong muon
Between Groups 2.816 3 .939 2.246 .085
Within Groups 71.046 170 .418
Total 73.862 173
2.4.2.2
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
phuong phap dao tao phu hop voi anh
(chi)
1.304 3 170 .275
giang vien truyen dat tot .780 3 170 .506
giang vien co kien thuc chuyen mon
sau rong
.669 3 170 .572
giang vien luon san sang giai dap
thac mac
.123 3 170 .946
– - QTKDTH

115. Khóa lu
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
phuong phap dao tao phu
hop voi anh (chi)
Between Groups 1.135 3 .378 .446 .721
Within Groups 144.290 170 .849
Total 145.425 173
giang vien truyen dat tot Between Groups .666 3 .222 .388 .762
Within Groups 97.311 170 .572
Total 97.977 173
giang vien co kien thuc
chuyen mon sau rong
Between Groups 2.018 3 .673 .811 .489
Within Groups 140.976 170 .829
Total 142.994 173
giang vien luon san sang
giai dap thac mac
Between Groups .543 3 .181 .210 .889
Within Groups 146.629 170 .863
Total 147.172 173
2.4.2.3 Cách th
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
co day du thiet bi giang day 1.250 3 170 .293
duoc cung cap day du tai lieu ve
chuong trinh hoc
2.816 3 170 .041
thoi gian dao tao duoc bo tri hop li 1.421 3 170 .238
dia diem dao tao thuan tien cho di lai 6.139 3 170 .001
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
co day du thiet bi giang
day
Between Groups .455 3 .152 .448 .719
Within Groups 57.573 170 .339
Total 58.029 173
duoc cung cap day du tai
lieu ve chuong trinh hoc
Between Groups 2.168 3 .723 1.939 .125
Within Groups 63.332 170 .373
Total 65.500 173
thoi gian dao tao duoc bo
tri hop li
Between Groups 1.183 3 .394 1.166 .324
Within Groups 57.489 170 .338
Total 58.672 173
dia diem dao tao thuan
tien cho di lai
Between Groups 1.331 3 .444 1.460 .227
Within Groups 51.663 170 .304
Total 52.994 173
– - QTKDTH

116. Khóa lu
2.4.2.4
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
co them nhieu thong tin kien thuc moi 1.410 3 170 .242
hoc duoc nhieu ki nang moi, hieu ro
hon cong viec
4.981 3 170 .007
co them tu tin de lam viec .661 3 170 .577
có phuong phap lam viec moi hieu
qua hon
.394 3 170 .758
hoan thanh cong viec nhanh, hieu
qua hon
.828 3 170 .480
co kha nang tu giam sat cong viec
cua minh
1.915 3 170 .129
nang luc chuyen mon duoc cai thien
ro ret
1.764 3 170 .156
chuong trinh dao tao xung dang voi
chi phi tien va thoi gian
3.809 3 170 .011
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
co them nhieu thong tin
kien thuc moi
Between Groups 5.266 3 1.755 2.892 .07
Within Groups 103.199 170 .607
Total 108.466 173
hoc duoc nhieu ki nang
moi, hieu ro hon cong
viec
Between Groups 7.675 3 2.558 4.315 .007
Within Groups 100.791 170 .593
Total 108.466 173
co them tu tin de lam viec Between Groups 4.242 3 1.414 2.032 .111
Within Groups 118.310 170 .696
Total 122.552 173
có phuong phap lam viec
moi hieu qua hon
Between Groups 2.703 3 .901 1.341 .263
Within Groups 114.222 170 .672
Total 116.925 173
hoan thanh cong viec
nhanh, hieu qua hon
Between Groups 1.262 3 .421 .569 .636
Within Groups 125.543 170 .738
Total 126.805 173
co kha nang tu giam sat
cong viec cua minh
Between Groups 2.454 3 .818 1.231 .300
Within Groups 112.971 170 .665
Total 115.425 173
nang luc chuyen mon
duoc cai thien ro ret
Between Groups 1.432 3 .477 .896 .444
Within Groups 90.545 170 .533
Total 91.977 173
chuong trinh dao tao
xung dang voi chi phi tien
va thoi gian
Between Groups 2.613 3 .871 1.923 .128
Within Groups 77.019 170 .453
Total 79.632 173
– - QTKDTH

117. Khóa lu
2.4.2.5
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
danh gia hai long ve chuong trinh dao
tao
4.756 3 170 .006
danh gia hai long ve cach thuc to
chuc khoa hoc
2.398 3 170 .070
danh gia hai long ve doi ngu giang
vien va phuong phap dao tao
1.171 3 170 .322
danh gia hai long ve ket qua dao tao .633 3 170 .595
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
danh gia hai long ve
chuong trinh dao tao
Between Groups .742 3 .247 .550 .649
Within Groups 76.476 170 .450
Total 77.218 173
danh gia hai long ve cach
thuc to chuc khoa hoc
Between Groups .969 3 .323 .879 .453
Within Groups 62.439 170 .367
Total 63.408 173
danh gia hai long ve doi
ngu giang vien va phuong
phap dao tao
Between Groups 1.239 3 .413 .485 .693
Within Groups 144.669 170 .851
Total 145.908 173
danh gia hai long ve ket
qua dao tao
Between Groups 3.627 3 1.209 1.985 .118
Within Groups 103.546 170 .609
Total 107.172 173
– - QTKDTH