Hirschsprung’s Disease

            R.K.Bagdi
       Senior Consultant
    Apollo Children;s Hospital
Patient S.C.

• Newborn male
• Full-term, uncomplicated vaginal
  delivery
• Normal birth weight: 3115 g
• Apgars 91, 95
• Mother: 36 yo, G1P0, healthy
Patient S.C.

• Started breast feeding DOL 1
• DOL 2-3 noted to have increasing
  abdominal distention
• No meconium passed in first 24 hrs of
  life
• 1 episode Non-bilious emesis
Patient S.C.
Patient S.C.


• Pediatric Surgical Consult
• Rectal Exam
  – Empty rectal ampulla
  – Tight anal sphincter
  – Large amount of stool and air upon
    withdrawal of finger
Patient S.C.
Patient S.C.


• Rectal mucosal biopsy
  – No ganglia identified
Patient S.C.
Patient S.C.

• Pt taken to OR for end colostomy and
  Hartmann’s pouch
• Dilated descending and sigmoid colon
• Prominent colonic blood vessels
• Site of colostomy, frozen section of
  colonic muscularis propria revealed
  ganglion cells
Patient S.C.
Patient S.C.

•   Postoperative course uneventful
•   Stool from colostomy POD 1
•   Tolerated breast feeding
•   Discharged POD 6
•   2nd stage pull through procedure
    planned in several weeks
Hirschsprung’s Disease


            R.K.Bagdi
    Apollo Children’s Hospital
Hirschsprung’s Disease

• Neurogenic form of intestinal obstruction
• Absence of ganglion cells in the myenteric
  and submucosal plexus
• Failure in relaxation of the internal anal
  sphincter and affected bowel
• Upstream bowel becomes dilated
  secondary to functional obstruction
History

•   1691 Ruysch latin texts
•   1886 Harald Hirschsprung – autopsy
•   1901 Tittel – histologic findings
•   1949 Swenson – pathophysiology and
    definitive operative treatment
Epidemiology

•   Prevalence: 1/5000 births
•   3-5% of pts have Down’s syndrome
•   Definite family history
•   80% affected are boys
•   Total colonic aganglionosis, 35% girls
•   >95% cases are full term babies
Pathogenesis
Pathogenesis

• Failure of neural crest cells to migrate caudally
• Aganglionosis begins at anorectal line
• 80% involve only rectosigmoid area
• 10% extend proximal to splenic flexure
• 10% involves the entire colon and part of small
  bowel
• Rarely involves entire gastrointestinal tract
Pathogenesis—genetics


 • 10th chromosome
 • RET-protooncogene
 • Endothelin B gene
Presentation
Presentation

• Severe abdominal distention
• 95% - failure to pass meconium in first 24
  hours life
• Bilious vomiting
• Older children - constipation, failure to thrive
• 10-15% - severe diarrhea alternating w/
  constipation—enterocolitis of Hirschsprung’s
  disease
Diagnosis


•   Abdominal plain X-rays
•   Barium Enema
•   Rectal Biopsies
•   Anal manometry
Abdominal X-ray
Barium Enema
Barium Enema

• Less sensitive for detecting short lesions,
  total colon aganglionosis, and disease of
  the newborn
• Many newborns do NOT show definitive
  transition zone
• Delayed evacuation of contrast
Rectal biopsy

• Submucosal suction biopsy
  – Meissner’s submucosal plexus
• Full thickness rectal biopsy
  – Auerbach’s myenteric plexus
• Acetylcholinesterase staining
  – increased staining of neurofibrils
Anorectal manometry


• Absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex
• Lack of internal anal sphincter
  relaxation in response to rectal
  stretch
Surgical Options


• Swenson Procedure (1948)
• Duhamel Procedure (1960)
• Soave Procedure (1963)
Swenson Procedure

• Sharp extrarectal dissection down to 2 cm
  above the anal canal
• Aganglionic colonic segment resected
• End-to-end anastamosis of normal
  proximal colon to anal canal
• Completely removes defective aganglionic
  colon
Swenson Procedure
Duhamel Procedure
• Posterior portion of defective colon
  segment resected
• Side to side anastamosis to left over
  portion of rectum
• Constipation a major problem d/t
  remaining aganglionic tissue
• Simpler operation, less dissection
Duhamel Procedure
Soave Procedure
• Circumferential cut through muscular coat
  of colon at peritoneal reflection
• Mucosa separated from the muscular coat
  down to the anal canal
• Proximal normal colon is pulled through
  retained muscular sleeve
• Telescoping anastamosis of normal colon
  to anal canal
Soave Procedure
Soave Procedure


• Advantage: rectal intramural
  dissection ensures no damage to
  pelvic neural structures
• Higher rate enterocolitis, diarrhea
• Problems w/ cuff abscesses, often
  requires repeated dilations
Overall Mortality


• Swenson procedure: 1-5%
• Duhamel procedure: 6%
• Soave procedure: 4-5%
Operative complications


•   Leak at anastamosis: 5-7%
•   Postop Enterocolitis: 19-27%
•   Constipation
•   Stricture Formation
•   Incontinence
One vs Two Stage procedure


• Historically, two stage procedure
  performed: preliminary colostomy, then
  completion pull through
• Delicate muscular sphincters of newborn
  may be injured
• 1980s, 1 stage procedures became more
  popular
One vs Two Stage procedure
– Early complications: No difference in
  incidence of anastomotic leak, pelvic
  infection, prolonged ileus, wound infection,
  wound dehiscence
– Late complications: No difference in
  incidence of anastomonic stricture, late
  obstruction, constipation, incontinence,
  urgency
– Postoperative enterocolitis higher in 1
  stage (42% vs 22%)
Laparoscopic techniques

• Small studies of laparoscopic pull through
  procedures
• Excised aganglionic tissues removed through
  anal canal, no abdominal incision
• Better results in terms of pain, return of bowel
  function, hospital stay
• Similar incidence of leaks, pelvic abscesses,
  enterocolitis, postop bowel function

Hirschsprungs disease

  • 1.
    Hirschsprung’s Disease R.K.Bagdi Senior Consultant Apollo Children;s Hospital
  • 2.
    Patient S.C. • Newbornmale • Full-term, uncomplicated vaginal delivery • Normal birth weight: 3115 g • Apgars 91, 95 • Mother: 36 yo, G1P0, healthy
  • 3.
    Patient S.C. • Startedbreast feeding DOL 1 • DOL 2-3 noted to have increasing abdominal distention • No meconium passed in first 24 hrs of life • 1 episode Non-bilious emesis
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Patient S.C. • PediatricSurgical Consult • Rectal Exam – Empty rectal ampulla – Tight anal sphincter – Large amount of stool and air upon withdrawal of finger
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Patient S.C. • Rectalmucosal biopsy – No ganglia identified
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Patient S.C. • Pttaken to OR for end colostomy and Hartmann’s pouch • Dilated descending and sigmoid colon • Prominent colonic blood vessels • Site of colostomy, frozen section of colonic muscularis propria revealed ganglion cells
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Patient S.C. • Postoperative course uneventful • Stool from colostomy POD 1 • Tolerated breast feeding • Discharged POD 6 • 2nd stage pull through procedure planned in several weeks
  • 12.
    Hirschsprung’s Disease R.K.Bagdi Apollo Children’s Hospital
  • 13.
    Hirschsprung’s Disease • Neurogenicform of intestinal obstruction • Absence of ganglion cells in the myenteric and submucosal plexus • Failure in relaxation of the internal anal sphincter and affected bowel • Upstream bowel becomes dilated secondary to functional obstruction
  • 14.
    History • 1691 Ruysch latin texts • 1886 Harald Hirschsprung – autopsy • 1901 Tittel – histologic findings • 1949 Swenson – pathophysiology and definitive operative treatment
  • 15.
    Epidemiology • Prevalence: 1/5000 births • 3-5% of pts have Down’s syndrome • Definite family history • 80% affected are boys • Total colonic aganglionosis, 35% girls • >95% cases are full term babies
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Pathogenesis • Failure ofneural crest cells to migrate caudally • Aganglionosis begins at anorectal line • 80% involve only rectosigmoid area • 10% extend proximal to splenic flexure • 10% involves the entire colon and part of small bowel • Rarely involves entire gastrointestinal tract
  • 18.
    Pathogenesis—genetics • 10thchromosome • RET-protooncogene • Endothelin B gene
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Presentation • Severe abdominaldistention • 95% - failure to pass meconium in first 24 hours life • Bilious vomiting • Older children - constipation, failure to thrive • 10-15% - severe diarrhea alternating w/ constipation—enterocolitis of Hirschsprung’s disease
  • 21.
    Diagnosis • Abdominal plain X-rays • Barium Enema • Rectal Biopsies • Anal manometry
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Barium Enema • Lesssensitive for detecting short lesions, total colon aganglionosis, and disease of the newborn • Many newborns do NOT show definitive transition zone • Delayed evacuation of contrast
  • 25.
    Rectal biopsy • Submucosalsuction biopsy – Meissner’s submucosal plexus • Full thickness rectal biopsy – Auerbach’s myenteric plexus • Acetylcholinesterase staining – increased staining of neurofibrils
  • 26.
    Anorectal manometry • Absentrectoanal inhibitory reflex • Lack of internal anal sphincter relaxation in response to rectal stretch
  • 27.
    Surgical Options • SwensonProcedure (1948) • Duhamel Procedure (1960) • Soave Procedure (1963)
  • 28.
    Swenson Procedure • Sharpextrarectal dissection down to 2 cm above the anal canal • Aganglionic colonic segment resected • End-to-end anastamosis of normal proximal colon to anal canal • Completely removes defective aganglionic colon
  • 29.
  • 30.
    Duhamel Procedure • Posteriorportion of defective colon segment resected • Side to side anastamosis to left over portion of rectum • Constipation a major problem d/t remaining aganglionic tissue • Simpler operation, less dissection
  • 31.
  • 32.
    Soave Procedure • Circumferentialcut through muscular coat of colon at peritoneal reflection • Mucosa separated from the muscular coat down to the anal canal • Proximal normal colon is pulled through retained muscular sleeve • Telescoping anastamosis of normal colon to anal canal
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Soave Procedure • Advantage:rectal intramural dissection ensures no damage to pelvic neural structures • Higher rate enterocolitis, diarrhea • Problems w/ cuff abscesses, often requires repeated dilations
  • 35.
    Overall Mortality • Swensonprocedure: 1-5% • Duhamel procedure: 6% • Soave procedure: 4-5%
  • 36.
    Operative complications • Leak at anastamosis: 5-7% • Postop Enterocolitis: 19-27% • Constipation • Stricture Formation • Incontinence
  • 37.
    One vs TwoStage procedure • Historically, two stage procedure performed: preliminary colostomy, then completion pull through • Delicate muscular sphincters of newborn may be injured • 1980s, 1 stage procedures became more popular
  • 38.
    One vs TwoStage procedure – Early complications: No difference in incidence of anastomotic leak, pelvic infection, prolonged ileus, wound infection, wound dehiscence – Late complications: No difference in incidence of anastomonic stricture, late obstruction, constipation, incontinence, urgency – Postoperative enterocolitis higher in 1 stage (42% vs 22%)
  • 39.
    Laparoscopic techniques • Smallstudies of laparoscopic pull through procedures • Excised aganglionic tissues removed through anal canal, no abdominal incision • Better results in terms of pain, return of bowel function, hospital stay • Similar incidence of leaks, pelvic abscesses, enterocolitis, postop bowel function

Editor's Notes

  • #5 Dilated small and large bowel loops, prominent transverse, descending, sigmoid
  • #7 Narrow rectum, dilated sigmoid colon, normal appearing remaining large bowel.
  • #9 Minimal residual contrast left in colon