The document provides guidance on improving the information architecture and scientific visibility of university websites by outlining key questions to consider regarding goals, audiences, and analysis, recommending benchmarking other top university sites, and emphasizing the importance of interaction design, open access initiatives, and social media to increase a university's scientific reputation and visibility.
4. QUESTIONS YOU MAY ASK YOURSELF
• Your Goals
• Your Challenges
• Your Target Audiences
• Your Analyses
5. STRATEGIC GOALS
• Reach more scientific international visibility?
• Obtain international agreements/
collaboration with reputed universities?
• Improve position on rankings (ARWU, THE,
Webometrics…)?
• Enhance Intranet Knowledge Management?
• Optimize CRM performance?
• … ?
6. TACTICAL GOALS
• More international students?
• More (and better) postgraduate students?
• Contract Highly Cited international Staff?
• Explore e-learning advantages?
• Companies agreements on R&D?
• … ?
7. YOUR GOALS
What do you want from your website? Example:
• More international students
8. YOUR GOALS
Web importance is growing as a source of information for international
students:
• 61% students said that the university’s website was very important when
they made their choice (website answers)
• 52% said that the opinion of someone who had been at this university was
very important (alumni)
• brochures (10%)
• exhibitions (8%)
(Lund University 2008- Sweden)
9. YOUR GOALS
So, when focusing on new students,
ask yourself:
“Why did students choose
my university?”
Gerry McGovern
Carewords Total %
Cumu
% of
Prestigious, well-
recognized degree 187 7% 7
Future job prospects 137 5% 12
Top quality
professors/lecturers 107 4% 16
Career advice 106 4% 19
Top ranking university 101 4% 23
Top ranking course 101 4% 27
Social life 99 4% 30
Nightlife 89 3% 33
Fees 87 3% 37
Postgraduate 80 3% 39
Student-focused 79 3% 42
Course materials 77 3% 45
Societies and clubs 73 3% 48
Faculties 71 3% 50
10. YOUR CHALLENGES
• Budget
• Bias (english dominance)
• Internationalization & Globalization
• Reputation & Credibility
• How the university is perceived
• Get them to where we want
11. YOUR TARGET AUDIENCES
• Prospective students
• Parents & Careers Advisers
• National and international researchers
• Potential customers
• The Media & Community
• Current students
• Staff
• Alumni
• Public Bodies & Government
12. ABOUT TARGET AUDIENCES
• Every potential user group look for different
information
• Same content has different importance for
different groups
• Prioritize contents prominance. How?
• Power law: within target groups / audience
segments / cohorts,
– a few info is searched by many,
– most of info searched by a few.
16. ANALYSIS – WHAT?
University goals
and objectives
Competitive
analysis
Tasks Analysis
Audiences
Analysis
User needs
analysis
17. ANALYSIS – HOW?
• End user focus groups
• Card sorting
• Search Analytics
• Web Analytics
• Online/E-mail questionnaire
• User prototypes testing
• Webmaster emails from users requests
• Etc.
18. ANALYSIS – HOW?
When measuring:
• Define who your users are (segmentation)
• Know what your users do on your site
• Understand your users motivations
• Don´t measure to meet your expectations
• Look for patterns
• Find causal relations
22. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
Change Management
Support
Process design
Checklists
Vision
Content “Supply” Flow
Performance Mgmt
Benchmarking data
Communications
Template messages
Presentations
Publications
Newsletters/Bulletins
Conferences
Demonstrations
“Success Stories”
FAQ
Training
Classroom study
Workshops
Distance Learning
Self Video/Audio
Train the trainers
On-line job aids
Faculty/Area Based
“Leadership kits”
Incentives +
Rewards Programs
Promotion Events
Frequent User Program
Academy Awards
Contests
Incentive Programs
Career Plan
usaid.gov
25. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
• Functional structure, not organizational
• The web team/committee is not the audience
• User always should know:
– where is,
– where has been,
– where is he going
26. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
Let´s do some benchmarking:
• Home page main structures of…
• Five of the better positioned universities in…
• Webometrics.info worldwide ranking
• Looking for matching points, patterns…
27. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
University portals analyzed:
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Harvard University
- Stanford University
- University of California Berkeley
- Pennsylvania State University
28. According to these Websites, we can
recognize a number of common sections in
large part.
Identifying them with color labels it is possible
to observe content related with
international and promotional aspects.
46. INTERACTION DESIGN
• Identify tasks
• Order by user priorities
• Order user priorities by university goals
• Create workflow to get the task done
• Test it & Iterate
• Measure after publishing
• Redesign if necessary
48. INTERACTION DESIGN
An example of best practice:
Situation: English speaker graduate interested on studying a PHD
in Netherlands, in Utrech University.
59. SCIENTIFIC VISIBILITY
• To have a better portal is the beginning, not the end of story
• A better portal is not enough
• Reputation & Credibility comes from every researcher´s
reputation
• Don´t wait the –research- world come to you
• The more links –visibility- to you, the more probability of visits
and goals –tasks- completed.
• Your university research need –always- more visibility
61. SCIENTIFIC VISIBILITY
• The more visibility, the more citations
• Visibility is for:
– best authors who produce…
– best papers, published in…
– best “places” (journals, databases, internet…) to be found in…
– more visible places, which are…
– those with more connections
64. SCIENTIFIC VISIBILITY
It is needed to enhance research visibility. How?
Outside your institution:
• Look for the best researchers (local, national, international)
• Attract international collaboration with better researchers than
yourself
65. SCIENTIFIC VISIBILITY
It is needed to enhance research visibility. How?
Inside your institution:
• Ensure control of your researchers publications
• Measure, Compare and Evaluate
• Give tools to reach more audience quickly.
• The more audience, the more probability of citation
66. SCIENTIFIC VISIBILITY
Control, measure and evaluation of researchers publications to:
• Audit internal researchers publications quality
• Understand your institution research fronts
• Compare them internally and with others
• Set personal and collective strategies
• Improve scientific motivation
68. SCIENTIFIC VISIBILITY
It is needed to enhance research visibility. How?
• Give researchers tools to reach more audience quickly.
• The more audience, the more probability of citation
How?
69. SCIENTIFIC VISIBILITY
• Publish in better impact factor Journals
• Publish in OAI (Open Access Initiative) journals
• Upload preprints, etc., to OAI repositories
• Think on Scholar SEO (Search Engine Optimization) at paper level.
• Work around general and specialized social networks
• Connect all actions (offline and online)
71. CONCLUSIONS
• Set your strategic goals
• Audit (diagnostics) first
• Segment your audience
• Analyze, measure, evaluate KPIs and production
• Make it a commitment all organization members (KM)
• Ensure everybody helps (Change management)
• Organize contents by tasks, not by organizational chart.
• The portal is not an island (visibility)
• Give tools to your people & researchers
• Think OAI / Scholar SEO & Social Media