The document summarizes findings from a study on faculty values and needs regarding scholarly communication across 12 disciplines. Key findings include: - Faculty rely heavily on peer-reviewed publications for tenure and promotion evaluations but are concerned about overreliance on journal brand and metrics. - New models of scholarly communication are needed that accommodate different publication formats while maintaining peer review and editorial quality. - Disciplinary differences exist in preferred publication formats and sharing practices, but peer review remains crucial for validating research quality.

1. Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: Faculty Values and Needs in Twelve Disciplines Diane Harley, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Center for Studies in Higher Education University of California, Berkeley Project Website and Associated Document Links: http:// cshe.berkeley.edu/research/scholarlycommunication http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc AAUP, June 18, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT Copyright 2010, Center for Studies in Higher Education

27. Academic Values and Scholarly Communication Practices: An Analysis of Faculty Choice and Opinion in Twelve Disciplines Diane Harley, Principal Investigator Center for Studies in Higher Education University of California, Berkeley Project Website and Associated Document Links: http:// cshe.berkeley.edu/research/scholarlycommunication http:// escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc [email_address] Copyright 2010, Center for Studies in Higher Education