- Colonial Chemical is a 20-year-old surfactant company that manufactures and sells green, safe, and innovative surfactants worldwide. - Their strategy is to create a series of surfactants from renewable resources that are mild, natural, and safe for personal care formulations and the environment. - They offer a line of naturally derived surfactants called Poly Suga that are made from plants like coconuts, corn, and sunflowers. These are mild, biodegradable alternatives to traditional surfactants.

1. Green Surfactant Solutions for Personal Care

14. Poly Suga ® Product Line

18. Poly Suga ® Quat Quaternized Polymeric Alkylpolyglucosides Global Acceptance

19. Poly Suga ® Quat Structure

21. TYPICAL PROPERTIES Poly Suga ® Quat TM-1218P TM-8610P L-1010P L-1210P S-1010P S-1210P Color, Gardner < 1 < 1 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Activity, % 29.7 31.8 29.9 28.5 28.8 29.4 Viscosity (as is), cps 1338 35 55 76 23 9400 Odor pH (10% aqueous) 7.00 7.25 7.56 7.59 7.45 7.52 Appearance, 10% aqueous Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear

22. Poly Suga ® Quat TM-1218P TM-8610P L-1010P L-1210P S-1010P S-1210P Immed. 125 180 165 170 165 145 1 minute 115 160 155 160 150 135 5 minutes 110 155 145 155 140 130 Draves Wetting (1% active), seconds 7.4 3.6 5.6 10.6 12.5 18.8

23. Poly Suga ® Phos Naturally Derived Anionic Surfactants Global Acceptance

24. Poly Suga ® Phos Structure

26. TYPICAL PROPERTIES Poly Suga ® Phos 6.8 Immediate Draves Wetting (1 % active), seconds 100 140 5 minutes 115 145 1 minute 135 165 Immediate Ross-Miles Foam Height (1%, 25C, tap water), mm 7.71 7.75 pH (10% aqueous) mild, fatty alcohol mild, fatty alcohol Odor 4250 20 Viscosity (cps), 25°C 38.6 38.8 Activity % 1 <1 Color, Gardner (ASTM D1544-98) Poly Suga ® Phos 1200P Poly Suga ® Phos 1000P

29. Poly Suga ® Nate Poly - APG - Sulfonate A Primary Surfactant Positioned for Global Acceptance

30. Poly Suga ® Nate Structure

32. Poly Suga ® Nate Sulfonated Alkyl Glucosides vs. Alpha Olefin Sulfonate 100P 160P Color, Gardner (ASTM D1544-98) < 1 < 1 Activity, % 40.5 38.6 Viscosity (cps), 25°C 25 12,500 Odor mild, fatty alcohol mild, fatty alcohol pH (10% aq) 7.0 7.3

33. Poly Suga ® Nate Sulfonated Alkyl Glucosides vs. Alpha Olefin Sulfonate 100P 160P Ross Miles Foam (1%, 25C, tap water), mm Immed. 165 150 1 min. 155 125 5 min. 150 125 Draves Wetting (1 % active), seconds 5.0 7.3

36. Poly Suga ® Betaine Naturally Derived Extremely Mild Betaine

37. Poly Suga ® Betaine Structure

39. POLY SUGA ® BETAINE TYPICAL PROPERTIES Poly Suga ® Betaine C Poly Suga ® Betaine L Appearance Clear, amber liquid Clear, amber liquid Color, Gardner 1 2 Activity, % 40 40 pH (10% aqueous) 7 7 Ross-Miles Foam Height (1% active), mm Immediate 180 135 1 minute 165 115 5 minutes 160 110 Draves Wetting (1 % active), seconds 5 minutes 3.3 5.7

40. POLY SUGA ® BETAINE

41. Poly Suga ® Mate Naturally Derived Extremely Mild Surfactant Foaming and Wetting Properties

42. Poly Suga ® Mate Structure

44. TYPICAL PROPERTIES Poly Suga ® Mate 6.0 3.9 Draves Wetting (1% active), seconds 115 165 5 minutes 120 170 1 minute 140 190 Immediate Ross-Miles Foam Height (1% active), mm 6.0 – 8.0 6.0 – 8.0 pH (10% aqueous) 37.0 – 39.0 37.0 – 39.0 & Solids 3 max. 3 max. Color, Gardner ’98 Clear Liquid Clear Liquid Appearance Poly Suga ® Mate L Poly Suga ® Mate D

53. GREEN STAR RATINGS CONTINUED Product Rating Poly Suga ® Betaine L 5.68 Poly Suga ® Betaine C 5.56 Poly Suga ® Nate 100P 6.50 Poly Suga ® Nate 160P 6.74 Poly Suga ® Quat S-1210P 7.47 Poly Suga ® Quat L-1010P 7.06 Poly Suga ® Sil C-35P 5.18 Poly Suga ® Sil C-800P 2.43 Cola ® Quat PDQ 5.87 Cola ® Teric LAB 6.34

54. GREEN STAR RATINGS Product Rating Cola ® Lipid C 4.53 Cola ® Lipid BP 5.19 Cola ® Lipid SAFL 5.20 Cola ® Lipid SUN 5.19 Cola ® Lipid OL 5.19 Cola ® Lipid ST 5.12 Cola ® Lipid RC 5.30 Cola ® Lipid DLO 6.71 Cola ® Lipid GS 5.19 Cola ® Lipid M 4.54 Cola ® Liqid DC 6.16 Cola ® Liqid DO 6.72 Cola ® Liqid DS 6.73 Cola ® Liqid DA 6.71

57. California Suit Against Whole Foods for Carcinogen in Body Care Products, with Corporate Puff Response from CEO John Mackey and the Truth from Nutritionist Cheryl Rounds Organic&quot; Megamerchant Waited Til Only After Suit Was Filed to Remove Offending Body Care Products! Time to Dump Your Shares? Santa Fe, New Mexico 7/07/2008 03:44 AM GMT (TransWorldNews) California Suit Against Whole Foods for Carcinogen in Body Care Products By Ronnie Cummins, Founder, Organic Consumers Association, and Prepared here by Stephen Fox, Managing Editor, Santa Fe Sun News California Files Lawsuit Against Whole Foods, Avalon, and Others Whose Products Tested Positive for Carcinogenic 1,4-Dioxane in OCA Study Details are here: http://www.prlog.org/10079593-california-lawsuit-whole-foods-avalon-and-others-with-products-containing-carcinogenic-1-4-dioxane.html OAKLAND, CA - Reacting in part to a study released by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) in March of this year, but also based on their own testing, the Attorney General of California has filed a major lawsuit against body care household-cleaning product companies whose products recently tested highest for the carcinogenic contaminant 1,4-Dioxane.

58. Under California's &quot;Proposition 65&quot; consumer products that contain toxic levels of 1,4 Dioxane must have warning labels stating they may cause cancer. 1,4-Dioxane is typically produced as a byproduct when ingredients are ethoxylated with the petrochemical ethylene oxide, a process which has become standard practice for many cleansing and moisturizing products. The suit, California v. Avalon Natural Products (manufacturer of the Alba brand), also names Whole Foods Market California (manufacturer of the Whole Foods 365 brand), Beaumont Products (manufacturer of the Citrus Magic brand), and Nutribiotic. It is unclear exactly which products manufactured by the aforementioned companies triggered the lawsuit, but all named companies have sold products that tested close to or in excess of 20 parts per million for 1,4-Dioxane in the OCA study released at the Natural Products Expo in Anaheim, CA in March . Last week OCA sent a letter to the four companies named in the California lawsuit to see if they are planning changes to their labeling or product formulations. Only one company responded. In a letter to the OCA, Beaumont Products wrote, &quot;Upon being notified that there was a problem with our product, we verified that the problem existed, then took immediate action.&quot; Beaumont has reformulated their products to remove the problematic ingredient, highlighting their dedication to providing safe products, in contrast to the lack of action taken by the other three companies. http://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/beaumont.doc )

59. The AG's complaint states that California wants, &quot;…preliminary injunctions, permanent injunctions, or other orders prohibiting the defendant(s) from exposing persons within the State of California to 1,4-dioxane without providing clear and reasonable warnings…&quot; The OCA's 1,4-dioxane study elevated the issue of fake 'natural' and 'organic' brands that utilize petrochemicals in their formulas in March, and now we are seeing labeling enforcement on a scale never seen before,&quot; says OCA National Director Ronnie Cummins. &quot;We used an independent laboratory and found that numerous 'natural' and 'organic' brands tested positive for 1,4-Dioxane, a cancer causing contaminant resulting from the petrochemical ethylene oxide being attached to one or more ingredients.&quot;

60. CANCER-CAUSING CHEMICAL FOUND IN CHILDREN'S BATH PRODUCTS Women’s Shampoos and Body Wash also Contaminated WASHINGTON — A hidden cancer-causing petrochemical has been found in dozens of children’s bath products and adults’ personal care products, at higher than acceptable levels. Laboratory tests released today revealed the presence of 1,4-Dioxane in products such as Hello Kitty Bubble Bath, Huggies Baby Wash, Johnson’s Baby Wash, Scooby-Doo Bubble Bath and Sesame Street Bubble Bath. The tests also found the carcinogen in Clairol Herbal Essences shampoo, Olay Complete Body Wash and many other personal care products. 1,4-Dioxane is a petroleum-derived contaminant considered a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and a clear-cut animal carcinogen by the National Toxicology Program. It is also on California’s Proposition 65 list of chemicals known or suspected by the state to cause cancer or birth defects. Because it is a contaminant produced during manufacturing, the FDA does not require it to be listed as an ingredient on product labels.

64. Thank You for Listening