Embed presentation






![icg 2014
Radial vs Femoral
Renal Outcomes
British Columbia Cardiac and Renal Registries
*p<.0001
Multivariate predictor for adverse renal events:
Femoral access OR 4.36 [2.48 to 7.66], p<.0001
Vuurmans T et al. Heart 2010;96:1538-1542](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/gilchristicacutekidneyinjury-141110081934-conversion-gate01/75/Gilchrist-IC-AIMRADIAL-2014-Acute-kidney-injury-7-2048.jpg)






This document summarizes several studies on the risk of acute kidney injury following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via the radial versus femoral artery access site. Registry data from British Columbia and a large US study found that femoral access was associated with significantly higher odds of adverse kidney outcomes after adjusting for risk factors. A single-center study also found higher rates of post-PCI acute kidney injury with femoral compared to radial access after propensity matching. While patient characteristics and contrast load are major risk factors for procedure-associated acute kidney injury, available data suggests radial access may have renoprotective effects compared to the femoral approach.






![icg 2014
Radial vs Femoral
Renal Outcomes
British Columbia Cardiac and Renal Registries
*p<.0001
Multivariate predictor for adverse renal events:
Femoral access OR 4.36 [2.48 to 7.66], p<.0001
Vuurmans T et al. Heart 2010;96:1538-1542](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/gilchristicacutekidneyinjury-141110081934-conversion-gate01/75/Gilchrist-IC-AIMRADIAL-2014-Acute-kidney-injury-7-2048.jpg)





