The document summarizes recent developments in open access and open science. It discusses how scholarly communication is changing from an obsession with competition to a focus on collaboration. It outlines new models for registering, archiving, and rewarding open scholarly works. These include open access repositories, preprint servers, social networks for peer review, and metrics that measure social reach rather than just citations. The document advocates making research data openly available and supporting open science through open licensing, copyright reform, and collaborative tools that advance knowledge sharing.

1. «Another world is possible»:
what’s new in Open Access
Elena Giglia
Ufficio Accesso aperto – editoria elettronica
Università di Torino
CNR Roma, 9.12.2015
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale.

2. What’s old - Green and Gold
DEPOSIT IN AN OPEN ACCESS
REPOSITORY YOUR WORK,
WHEREVER PUBLISHED,
ACCORDING
TO COPYRIGHT POLICIES
[now / at zero costs]
PUBLISH IN AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL
[23% requires Article processing fees]
http://www.righttoresearch.org/resources/OpenResearchGlossary/

3. What’s new: more reflection
http://cameronneylon.net/http://bjoern.brembs.net/

4. Zen scholarly communication?
Scholarly communication is a
distributed process of knowledge creation
that requires a great conversation.
Much of scientific work is made up of
collaboration rather than competition. Science
exhibits the nature of networks, not that of
Olympic games. Concern of quality has been
replaced by an obsession for competition
Scholarly communication is changing. Two questions:
1) What will it be like? The question can be framed in two ways:
The first is the “scriptorium way” when press was invented:
how to adapt the present to the (yet unknown) future.
Open Access debate has followed this path.
The second way, more fundamentally, strongly foregrounds the notion
of “scientific communication”: WHAT DOES IT NEED TO WORK BEST?
- a set of useful, credible, peers;
- “crystals” of knowledge
2) Who will control it?
Scholars must regain possession of their own work (and its evaluation)
SKILLS AND SERVICES NEEDED FOR THE GREAT CONVERSATION
SHOULD SERVE ITS OBJECTIVES, NOT THE REVERSE.

5. A blurred and colorful environment…
617
https://101innovations.wordpress.com/

6. http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/2015/12/a-social-networking-site-is-not-an-open-access-repository/
http://mittelalter.hypotheses.org/7123
Remind: there are different species

7. [Impact Factor]
Scholarly communication:
core functions
Rosendaal H. –Geurts P. Forces and functions in scientific communication:an analysis of their interplay, CRISP 1997
JOURNAL
REGISTRATION
CERTIFICATION
AWARENESS
ARCHIVING
REWARD

8. Times Higher Education, 5 Nov 2015
Impact factor?
Brembs, Digital Scholarship and Open Science need a digital infrastructure , Nov. 2015

9. A new perspective: from “impact” to “reach”
https://purl.stanford.edu/jr256tk1194

10. Registration
https://github.com/
REGISTRATION
https://zenodo.org/
http://rio.pensoft.net/
http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap4.html
http://ipython.org/notebook.html
https://www.overleaf.com/
http://www.myexperiment.org/home
https://hypothes.is/

11. Certification, awareness, reward
AWARENESS
ARCHIVING
CERTIFICATION
https://publons.com/
https://www.peerageofscience.org/
Tweets can predict highly cited articles within
the first 3 days of article publication. Social
media activity either increases citations or
reflects the underlying qualities of the article
that also predict citations […]
G. Eysenbach, Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation
with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact, J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e123
https://opennessinitiative.org/
http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/10/22/029629
REWARD
https://impactstory.org/
http://www.altmetric.com/
https://icite.od.nih.gov/

12. A wider view:
from Open Access to Open Science
Video, 30 nov 2015
Making Open Science a reality, OECD, 2015

13. Bibliodiversity https://www.openlibhums.org/
https://www.openedition.org/

14. A new sustainability?

15. http://thinkchecksubmit.org/
New services
https://openaccessbutton.org/
http://www.dissemin.net/
http://whyopenresearch.org/

16. The pillars: Open research data
https://www.digital-science.com/blog/guest/open-sesame-the-risks-and-rewards-of-open-data-for-researchers/
INTELLIGENT
OPENNESS
WHY DO YOU NEED A DATA
MANAGEMENT PLAN
PMRblog, 2011

17. Data to build a sounder science
The Atlantic blog, Dec 4 2015 Open research data pilot
Video Nov.19, 2015
Blog, 15 nov 2015

18. Unlocking science
http://contentmine.org/
http://project.futuretdm.eu/

19. Glynn Moody, 19 Nov 2015
Fighting
http://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/

20. Fighting for your rights
https://savethelink.org/
http://youcan.fixcopyright.eu/
https://juliareda.eu/2015/09/academics-for-copyright-reform/

21. On the horizon…
http://www.leru.org/index.php/public/extra/signtheLERUstatement/
H.Morrison, 9 nov. 2015
http://goo.gl/3VQE6W

22. Openness
In science, OPENESS IS ESSENTIAL.
Open science doesn’t mean ignoring economic reality.
Of course we need business models to be sustainable.
But that doesn’t mean we have to carry on doing
things the way they have always been done.
So, wherever you sit in the value chain, wheter you’re a
researcher or an investor or a policy maker,
my message is clear:
let’s invest in collaborative tools that let us progress…
Let’s tear down the walls that keep learning sealed off.
And let’s make science open. N. Kroes, Let’s make science open, giugno 2012

23. …now it’s up to you
elena.giglia@unito.it
…and please don’t say