SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
Pre Submission Seminar Presentation
Formulation and Evaluation of Immediate Release Tablet for
Treatment of Overactive Bladder
Presented by: Bhumin Nitin Jain Guided by:
M. Pharmacy 2nd Year Sem IV Dr. Monika Ola
22MPH1007 Associate Professor
Dept. of Pharmaceutics
1
R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Shirpur
 Contents
• Introduction
• Aim, Need and Objective
• Plan of Work
• Drug Profile
• Excipients Profile
• Materials and Instruments
• Preformulation Studies
• Formulation Studies
• Evaluation Studies
• Stability Studies
• Test Product VS Reference Product
• References
2
 Introduction
• Overactive bladder (OAB) is a combination of urinary symptoms that includes a
sudden, strong need to urinate.
Figure 1 Normal and Overactive Bladder
• The major symptom of OAB is a sudden, strong urge to urinate that you can't ignore.
3
Reference:https://www.ever
ydayhealth.com/overactive-
bladder/causes/
• Leak urine or have “urge incontinence.” This means urine leaks when you feel the
sudden urge to go.
• Urinate frequently. You may need to go to the bathroom many times during the day.
• Wake up at night to pass urine.
 Risk Factors for OAB:
• Hormone changes
• Pelvic muscle weakness or spasms
• A urinary tract infection
• Side effects from a medication
4
Reference:https://www.myrbetriqhcp.com/combi
nation-treatment/#
Figure 2 MOA of Drug
 Aim, Need and Objective
• Aim: To formulate and evaluate immediate release tablet for treatment of Overactive
Bladder
• Need:
1. The cost for (branded) oral tablet 10 mg is around $411 for a supply of 30 tablets. It
indicates that there is strong need of generic version for affordable healthcare.
2. The data shows that number of people affected with overactive bladder is 37
million.
Figure 3 No. of people affected by OAB
5
Reference:https://www.urovantmed
icalaffairs.com/overview-of-
overactive-bladder
• Objective:
1. To formulate and evaluate immediate release tablets by Direct compression.
2. To study dissolution profile and to compare their drug-release profiles with
(innovator)
3. To study stability of optimized formulation.
4. To compare test product with reference product.
6
 Plan of work
1. Literature review
2. Selection of Drug and Excipients
3. Preformulation Studies
4. Formulation Development
5. Evaluation of Formulation
6. Stability Studies of Formulation
7
 Drug Profile
Drug Name Drug X
Category Antimuscarinic Antagonist
Molecular weight 362.465 g/mol
BCS class BCS class I
Half-life 45-68 hrs
Log P 1.69
Solubility It is freely soluble at room temperature in
water, glacial acetic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide,
and methanol.
8
Table 1 Drug Profile
 Excipients Profile
9
Parameter Lactose
Monohydrate
Corn Starch Hypromellose
2910
Magnesium
Stearate
Molecular
formula
C12H22O11 H2O C27H48O20 C56H108O30 C36H70MgO4
Molecular
weight g/mol
360.31 692.65 1261.45 591.27
Solubility Freely soluble in
water; practically
insoluble in ethanol,
diethyl ether and
chloroform.
Practically
insoluble in cold
ethanol and in
cold water.
Partially soluble
in DMSO.
Soluble in cold
water,practically
insoluble in hot
water and ether,
but soluble in
mixtures of
ethanol
Practically
insoluble in
ethanol, ether and
water; slightly
soluble in warm
benzene and
warm ethanol.
Melting point 201–2020 C 256-258OC 225–230oC 117–150o C
Function Diluent / filler Disintegrant Binder Lubricant
Table 2 Excipients Profile
 Materials and Instruments
10
Sr no. Material Grade Function Supplier
1. Drug X - API
Enaltec Labs
Pvt. Ltd.
2.
Lactose
Monohydrate
Super Tab 14,
spray- Dried
Diluent DFE Pharma
3. Corn Starch
Maize Starch B
Pharma Grade
Disintegrant
Roquette
Freres
4.
Hypromellose
2910
Methocel E5
Premium LV
Binder
Dow
chemical
company
5.
Magnesium
Stearate
Hyqual,
Vegetable
Source
Lubricant
Avantor
Performance
materials Inc.
6. Opadry yellow
Opadry yellow
(03F520313)
Coating
Ingredient
Colorcon Asia
Pvt. Ltd.
7. Opadry pink
Opadry pink
(03F540267)
Coating
Ingredient
Colorcon Asia
Pvt. Ltd.
Sr No. Equipments Name
Name of Manufacturer with
model
1. Weighing Balance Sartorius CP224S
2. Weighing Balance Mettler Toledo BBA422
3. Double Cone Blender Gansons
4. Compression Machine Cadmach CMB4-MT
5. Sieve Shaker
Electromagnetic Sieve Shaker
EMS-8
6. Vernier Caliper
Mitutoyo Absolute AOS
Digimatic
7. Moisture Analyzer Mettler Toledo HB43-S
8. Hardness Tester
Dr. Schleuniger Pharmatron
8M
9. Friability Tester Electrolab EF-2
10. Disintegration Test Apparatus Electrolab ED-2SAPO
11. Tapped Density Apparatus Electrolab ETD-1020
12. Tablet Coating Machine Neocota
13. Differential Scanning Calorimeter
Mettler DSC 1 star system,
Mettler-Toledo, Switzerland
14. Dissolution Apparatus Electrolab ED-2SAPO
15. FTIR Thermo Scientific iD3
Table 3 List of Materials
Table no 4 List of Instruments
 Preformulation studies
• Organoleptic properties:
Table 5 Organoleptic Properties
• UV Analysis:
Test Results
Description White Powder
Taste and Odour Bitter and Odourless
Loss on Drying 1.50 %
Figure 4 UV Spectrum of Drug
11
Concentration
(µg/mL)
Absorbance
5 0.265
10 0.437
15 0.627
20 0.824
25 0.981
30 1.134
Concentration
(µg/mL)
Absorbance
5 0.265
10 0.437
15 0.627
20 0.824
25 0.981
30 1.134
Table 6 Absorbance of Drug
Figure 5 Calibration curve of drug in water
• XRD :
Figure 6 XRD Pattern of API
2θ values
3.75
7.45
11.16
14.19
18.61
19.30
20.99
23.21
25.13
Table 7 2θ Values of X-Ray
12
• FTIR:
13
Figure 7 FTIR of Drug
Type of Vibrations
Standard
Peakcm-1
Observed
Peakcm-1
C=O 1730-1715 1716.95
C-H 3000-2500 2876.85
C≡N 2500-2000 2298.10
C=C 2000-1500 1578.61
C-N 1500-1000 1352.98
S-O 700-500 548.29
Table 8 Reported IR Frequency of Drug
• Melting Point:
1) Capillary Rise Method:
2) Differential scanning calorimetry: The melting point of Drug X was confirmed by
differential scanning calorimetry which was performed at the scanning rate of
10°C/min with 80 mL/min of nitrogen purging. It was confirmed with the reported
melting point of i.e., Drug X ranges between 144-149°C.
14
Standard Observed
144 – 149 °C 145 – 151 °C
Table no 9 Melting Point
Figure no 8 DSC Curve of drug
• Particle Size Determination:
Conclusion: From above study, it was found that Drug used for observation was
relatively fine.
• Sieve Analysis:
15
Specification Particle Size
d (10) 11 um
d (50) 36 um
d (90) 73 um
Sieve
Sizes
Initial
weight of
sieves
Final
weight of
sieves
Difference
in weights
%
retained
Cumulative
% retained
20# 366.6 366.6 0 0 0
40# 328.8 328.8 0 0 0
60# 334.2 338.0 3.8 19 19
80# 336.8 344.8 8.0 40 59
100# 328.0 331.6 3.6 18 77
Pan 531.6 536.2 4.6 23 100
Total 20.0
Conclusion: Drug was passed from
respective sieves using sieve
shaker and cumulative % retained
was calculated .
Table no 10 Particle Size Determination
Table no 11 Sieve Analysis of drug
• Flow Property:
Conclusion: Based on the findings, Flow character of Lubricated blend is Passable.
16
Properties Characters
Bulk Density 0.571 gm/ml
Tap Density 0.762 gm/ml
Compressibility Index 25.065 %
Hausner’s Ratio 1.335
Table no 12 Flow Property
• Drug-Excipient Compatibility Study
17
API Excipients Ratio used
Drug X - -
Drug X Lactose monohydrate (SuperTab 14SD) 1:21.4
Drug X Corn starch (Maize Starch B Pharma Grade) 1:6.3
Drug X Hypromellose 2910 (Methocel E5 Premium LV) 1:1.2
Drug X Magnesium stearate (Hyqual, Vegetable Source) 1:0.1
Drug X Opadry pink (03F540267) 1:0.45
Drug X Opadry yellow (03F520313) 1:0.90
Drug X All excipients (for 5 mg strength) 1:21.4:6.3:1.2:0.1:0.90
Drug X All excipients (for 10 mg strength) 1:21.4:6.3:1.2:0.1:0.45
Figure 9 Normal overlay diffractogram scan of
API, Drug X tablets , 5 mg and Drug X tablets ,
5 mg Placebo
Figure 10 Normal overlay diffractogram scan of
API, Drug X tablets, 10 mg and Drug X tablets,
10 mg Placebo
The X-ray diffractogram DrugX API,
Drug X tablets 5 and 10 mg, and Drug X
tablets 5 and 10 mg placebo has shown
sharp peaks at different angles (2ϴ)
13.5°, 15.5°, 17.6°, 18.1° and
21.8°.
Table 13 Ratio of API & Excipients used
18
Stability condition – Initial
Binary mixture Ratio
Assay
(%w/w)
Related Substances (%w/w)
Method I
Method
II Total
Impu
rities
(Met
hod I
and
II)
Impuri
ty-I
N-
Oxide
impuri
ty
Any
other
individ
ual
impurit
y
R-(-)-3-
Quinucli
dinol
impurity
(Imp.-E)
90.0 –
110.0
NMT
0.5
NMT
0.5
NMT
0.2
NMT
0.5
NMT
2.0
Drug XAPI - 99.90 0.002 0.015 0.030 ND 0.096
Drug X+ SuperTab 14SD
1:21.
4
99.94 0.006 0.014 0.018 ND 0.059
Drug X+ Maize Starch B
Pharma Grade
1:6.3 99.94 0.004 0.019 0.013 ND 0.064
Drug X+ Methocel E5
Premium LV
1:1.2 99.91 0.006 0.017 0.027 ND 0.089
Drug X+ Hyqual,
Vegetable Source
1:0.1 99.94 0.004 0.017 0.017 ND 0.065
Drug X+ Opadry Yellow
0.3F520313
1:0.9
0
99.94 0.005 0.019 0.019 ND 0.058
Drug X+ Opadry Pink
03F540267
1:0.4
5
99.93 0.002 0.018 0.020 ND 0.069
Drug X+ all excipient for
5 mg strength
- 99.93 0.004 0.026 0.021 ND 0.069
Drug X+ all excipients
for 10 mg strength
- 99.93 0.003 0.009 0.033 ND 0.071
Stability condition – 60°C/80% RH; 1M (Open)
Binary mixture Ratio
Assay
(%
w/w)
Related Substances (% w/w)
Method I
Method
II
Total
Impur
ities
(Method
I
and
II)
Impur
ity-I
N-Oxide
impur
ity
Any
other
individual
impur
ity
R-(-)-3-
Quinuclidinol
impur
ity
(Imp.-E)
90.0 –
110.0
NMT
0.5
NMT
0.5
NMT
0.2
NMT 0.5
NMT
2.0
Drug X API - 99.91 0.002 0.022 0.029 ND 0.091
Drug X + SuperTab 14SD 1:21.4 99.93 0.004 0.023 0.021 ND 0.067
Drug X + Maize Starch B
Pharma Grade
1:6.3 99.94 0.004 0.025 0.015 ND 0.066
Drug X + Methocel E5
Premium LV
1:1.2 99.91 0.004 0.021 0.032 ND 0.091
Drug X + Hyqual,
Vegetable Source
1:0.1 99.93 0.003 0.021 0.015 ND 0.071
Drug X + Opadry Yellow
0.3F520313
1:0.90 99.91 0.004 0.027 0.017 ND 0.091
Drug X + Opadry Pink
03F540267
1:0.45 99.92 0.002 0.024 0.027 ND 0.078
Drug X + all excipient for
5 mg strength
- 99.92 0.004 0.027 0.021 ND 0.075
Drug X + all excipients for
10 mg strength
- 99.91 0.003 0.021 0.043 ND 0.090
Table no 14 Initial data of drug-excipient
compatibility study
Table no 15 Stability data of drug-excipient
compatibility study
 Formulation studies
Trial no. Trial name Observations
1. To take trial batch by DC
and to study
physicochemical
parameters
All parameters were
found satisfactory and
meet the specification.
Dissolution of generic
Drug X tablets, 10 mg
was observed more than
85% in 15 minutes.
2. To take trial batch using
reduced particle size to
study impact on
dissolution of drug
It was concluded that
reduced API PSD has no
impact on dissolution of
drug product.
3. To take trial batch 5mg
using reduced particle size
of API to study impact on
dissolution of drug
It was concluded that
reduced API PSD has no
impact on dissolution of
drug product.
19
Sr.
No.
Name of
Ingredient
Qty (mg) / tablet
T1 (10
mg)
T2 (10
mg)
T3 (5
mg)
Optimized
Batch
5 mg 10
mg
1. Drug X 10.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 10.00
2. Lactose
Monohydrate
102.00 125.00 130.00 130.
00
125.0
0
3. Corn Starch 31.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50
4. Hypromellose
2910
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
5. Magnesium
Stearate
0.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
6. Opadry Pink 3.75 3.75 - - 3.75
7. Opadry
Yellow
- - 3.75 3.75 -
8. Purified Water q.s q.s q.s q.s q.s
20
Trial no Dose
Tablet
wt.
(mg)
Thickness
(mm)
Diameter
(mm)
Hardness
(N)
Friability
(% w/w)
Assay
(%
w/w)
D.T
Time
T1 10 mg
146.0 -
153.0
3.35 -3.40 7.51 - 7.52 39 -55 0.22 99.0 3-4 min
T2 10 mg
149.1 –
152.3
3.46 – 3.49 7.52 – 7.54 45 -50 0.09 98.2 4-5 min
T3 5 mg
148.3 –
154.9
3.39 – 3.46 7.50 – 7.53 37 -47 0.11 96.9 4-5 min
Optimi-
zed
Batch
5 mg
149.00 –
156.00
3.44 - 3.52 7.49 -7.52 41 – 49 0.13 97.90
4 min 13
sec
10 mg
146.00 –
154.00
3.40 – 3.47 7.53 -7.55 43-51 0.10 98.0
3 min 50
sec
Trial no
Tablet wt.
(mg)
Thickness
(mm)
Diameter
(mm)
D.T Time
T1 149.0 – 163.0 3.39 – 3.51 7.54 – 7.57 4-5 min
T2 148.8 – 154.3 3.43 – 3.47 7.52 – 7.55 5-6 min
T3 148.9 – 155.2 3.42 – 3.49 7.52 – 7.55 5-6 min
Optimized
Batch
5 mg 151 – 156 3.51 – 3.56 7.53 -7.56
4 min 43
sec
10 mg 151 – 156 3.49 – 3.56 7.51 -7.54
4 min 14
sec
Table no 16 Physical In process Parameters of
Core Tablets
Table no 17 Physical In process Parameters of
Coated Tablets
• In Vitro Dissolution Release
1) Trial Batch 1
21
Batch No. (RLD) Trial batch 1
Dissolution
conditions
USP II/900 mL Water/50 rpm
Time (Minutes) % Drug release % RSD % Drug release % RSD
10 67 7.05 64 14.8
15 88 5.23 91 7.91
30 101 1.84 97 4.9
45 101 1.49 97 5.08
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50
%
Drug
release
Time (min.)
Comparative dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 10 mg in water
RLD
Trial batch 1
Table no 18 Dissolution profiles of Drug X
tablets, 10 mg in water
Figure no 11 Dissolution profiles of Drug X
tablets, 10 mg
2) Trial Batch 2
22
Impact of particle size on % drug release of drug product
Batch No.
(API with d90: 110.38 µm) (API with d90: 45.2 µm)
Dissolution condition USP II/900 mL Water/50 rpm
Time (Minutes) % Drug release % RSD % Drug release % RSD
10 64 14.8 60 29.9
15 91 7.91 82 15.72
30 97 4.9 94 2.81
45 97 5.08 96 2.7
0
50
100
150
0 10 20 30 40 50
%
Dr
ug
r
elease
Time (min.)
Dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 10 mg with different API
PSD
d90:110.38µm
d90: 45.2µm
Table no 19 Dissolution profile of Drug X
tablets, 10 mg with different API PSD
Figure no 12 Dissolution profile of Drug X
tablets, 10 mg with different API PSD
3) Trial Batch 3
23
Batch No. (RLD) Trial batch 3
Dissolution
condition
USP II/900 mL Water/50 rpm
Time (Minutes) % Drug release % RSD % Drug release % RSD
10 37 15.89 55 16.79
15 72 12.33 73 14.0
30 97 2.48 90 2.02
45 97 1.01 96 2.77
F2 value 50.59
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50
%
Drug
release
Time (min.)
Comparative dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 5 mg in water
RLD
Trial batch 3
Table no 20 Dissolution profiles of RLD and
Drug X tablets, 5 mg
Figure no 13 Dissolution profiles of RLD and
Drug X tablets, 5 mg
• Optimized Batch
Table 21 Multimedia dissolution profiles of
Drug X tablets, 5 mg
Figure 14 Multimedia dissolution profiles of Drug
X tablets, 5 mg
Table 22 Multimedia dissolution profiles of
Drug X tablets, 10 mg
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50
%
Drug
release
TIme (min.)
Multimedia dissolution profile of solifenacin succinate tablets, 10 mg
Water
0.1N HCl
pH 4.5 acetate buffer
pH 6.8 phosphate buffer
Figure 15 Multimedia dissolution profiles of Drug
X tablets, 10 mg
24
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50
%
Drug
release
TIme (min.)
Water
0.1N HCl
pH 4.5 acetate buffer
pH 6.8 phosphate buffer
Product Drug XTablets, 5 mg
Dissoluti
on
conditio
n
USP II / 900 mL
water / 50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL
0.1 N HCl / 50
rpm
USP II / 900 mL
pH 4.5 acetate
buffer / 50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL
pH 6.8
phosphate buffer
/ 50 rpm
Time
(minutes
)
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
%
RSD
10 49 28.55 44 26.01 47 18.32 49 23.15
15 75 18.98 72 24.37 79 13.64 76 16.93
30 96 4.03 101 1.48 101 0.51 92 2.94
45 97 3.5 102 1.66 101 0.93 93 2.13
Product Drug X tablets, 10 mg
Dissoluti
on
condition
USP II / 900 mL
water / 50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL
0.1 N HCl / 50
rpm
USP II / 900 mL
pH 4.5 acetate
buffer / 50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL
pH 6.8
phosphate buffer
/ 50 rpm
Time
(minutes)
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
%
RSD
10 59 29.5 65 9.98 67 15.23 61 22.82
15 78 22.62 84 8.22 90 11.19 82 17.86
30 97 1.42 98 1.8 100 1.27 93 1.65
45 97 1.55 98 1.41 100 1.59 93 1.24
• RLD Dissolution
25
Product Innovator drug , 5 mg
Dissolution
condition
USP II / 900 mL
water / 50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL 0.1
N HCl / 50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL pH
4.5 acetate buffer /
50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL pH
6.8 phosphate buffer
/ 50 rpm
Time
(minutes)
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
% RSD
%
Release
% RSD
10 37 15.89 53 7.68 62 5.83 37 23.69
15 72 12.33 72 6.54 86 4.69 56 20.78
30 97 2.48 94 4.3 101 2.58 81 8.47
45 97 1.01 99 2.45 102 1.69 85 3.6
Table 23 Multimedia dissolution profile of Innovator
drug , 5 mg
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50
%
Drug
Release
Time (min.)
Water
0.1N HCl
pH 4.5 acetate buffer
pH 6.8 phosphate buffer
Figure 16 Multimedia dissolution profile of
Innovator drug , 5 mg
Product Innovator drug , 10 mg
Dissolution
condition
USP II / 900 mL
water / 50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL 0.1
N HCl / 50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL pH
4.5 acetate buffer /
50 rpm
USP II / 900 mL pH
6.8 phosphate buffer
/ 50 rpm
Time
(minutes)
%
Release % RSD
%
Release % RSD
%
Release % RSD
%
Release % RSD
10 67 7.05 60 5.54 48 28.37 48 30.06
15 88 5.23 79 5.64 70 23.68 69 23.91
30 101 1.84 99 1.65 97 6.55 92 9.39
45 101 1.49 102 1.35 100 2.04 95 2.27
Table 24 Multimedia dissolution profile of Innovator
drug , 10 mg
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50
%
Drug
Release
Time (min.)
Water
0.1N HCl
pH 4.5 acetate buffer
pH 6.8 phosphate buffer
Figure 17 Multimedia dissolution profile of
Innovator drug , 10 mg
 Evaluation Studies
26
Trial no Dose
Tablet wt.
(mg)
Thickness(
mm)
Diameter(
mm)
Hardness(
N)
Friability(
% w/w)
Assay(%
w/w)
T1 10 mg
146.0 -
153.0
3.35 -3.40 7.51 - 7.52 39 -55 0.22 99.0
T2 10 mg
149.1 –
152.3
3.46 – 3.49 7.52 – 7.54 45 -50 0.09 98.2
T3 5 mg
148.3 –
154.9
3.39 – 3.46 7.50 – 7.53 37 -47 0.11 96.9
Optimi-
zed
Batch
5 mg
149.00 –
156.00
3.44 - 3.52 7.49 -7.52 41 – 49 0.13 97.90
10 mg
146.00 –
154.00
3.40 – 3.47 7.53 -7.55 43- 51 0.10 98.0
RLD
5 mg
146.00-
157.00
3.44- 3.51 7.48- 7.53 40- 49 0.13 100.4
10 mg
145.00-
154.00
3.39-3.47 7.52-7.58 40- 50 0.10 100.4
 Stability Studies
27
Stability data of Drug X tablets, 5 mg
Packing
configuration
30 tablets in 23cc HDPE bottle with PPCR closure
Time points
Shelf-life
specification
Initia
l
1M 2M 3M 6M
Stability
conditions
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 97.7 98.0 97.4 98.6 98.3 98.1
97.
4
2. Related Substances
Procedure I
a) Impurity I
Not more than
0.5
ND BDL ND ND ND ND ND
b) N-Oxide
impurity
Not more than
0.5
0.03 0.09 0.14 0.06 0.13 0.09
0.1
3
c) Any other
individual impurity
Not more than
0.2
0.01 0.02
0.09
(RRT
-0.63)
0.09
(RRT
-0.63)
0.14
(RRT-
0.63)
0.09
(RRT
-0.64)
0.1
6
(RR
T-
0.6
4)
Procedure II
d) R-(-)-3-
Quinuclidinol
impurity
Not more than
0.5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
e) Total impurities
(I and II)
Not more than
2.0
0.05 0.16 0.30 0.25 0.40 0.20
0.4
0
3. Water by KF
(%)
Not more than
8.0
4.9 5.5 5.0 4.8 4.9 4.1 5.2
4. Dissolution
NLT 80% (Q)
in 30 min.
% Drug release
30 min. 98 97 93 99 99 92 90
Stability data of Drug X Tablets, 5 mg
Packing
configuration
90 tablets in 30cc HDPE bottle with PPCR closure
Time points
Shelf-life
specification
Initial
1M 2M 3M 6M
Stability
conditions
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 97.9 97.7 97.2 98.3 97.9 97.5
96.
4
2. Related Substances
Procedure I
a) Impurity I
Not more
than 0.5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
b) N-Oxide
impurity
Not more
than 0.5
0.03 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.14 0.11
0.1
6
c) Any other
individual
impurity
Not more
than 0.2
0.01
0.01
(RRT-
0.48)
0.09
(RRT-
0.64)
0.07
(RRT-
0.64)
0.13
(RRT-
0.63)
0.06
(RRT-
0.64)
0.1
5
(RR
T-
0.6
4)
Procedure II
d) R-(-)-3-
Quinuclidinol
impurity
Not more
than 0.5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
e) Total impurities
(I and II)
Not more
than 2.0
0.05 0.13 0.31 0.20 0.39 0.23
0.4
3
3. Water by KF
(%)
Not more
than 8.0
4.9 4.8 4.7 5.2 5.1 3.6 4.0
4. Dissolution
NLT 80%
(Q) in 30
min.
% Drug release
30 min. 98 98 96 98 97 95 93
Stability data of Dr ug X Tablets, 5 mg
Packing
configuration
PVC/Aclar unit dose blister pack of 10 tablets
Time points
Shelf-life
specification
Initia
l
1M 2M 3M 6M
Stability
conditions
40°C/75%RH
25°C/60%RH
40°C/75%RH
25°C/60%RH
40°C/75%RH
1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 97.9 97.7 97.3 98.0 97.3 97.3 96.5
2. Related Substances
Pr ocedur e I
a) Impurity I
Not more
than 0.5
ND BDL ND ND ND ND ND
b) N-Oxide
impurity
Not more
than 0.5
0.03 0.07 0.12 0.08 0.11 0.10 0.11
c) Any other
individual impurity
Not more
than 0.2
0.01
0.02
(RRT
-0.23)
0.11
(RRT
-0.64)
0.06
(RRT
-0.63)
0.16
(RRT-
0.63)
0.06
(RRT
-
0.64)
0.19
(RR
T-
0.6
4)
Pr ocedur e II
d) R-(-)-3-
Quinuclidinol
impurity
Not more
than 0.5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
e) Total impurities
(I and II)
Not more
than 2.0
0.05 0.15 0.35 0.20 0.42 0.22 0.41
3. Water by KF
(%)
Not more
than 8.0
4.9 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.5 3.4 5.5
4. Dissolution
NLT 80%
(Q) in 30
min.
% Dr ug r elease
30 min. 98 99 96 97 94 94 93
28
Stability data of Drug X Tablets, 10 mg
Packing
configuration
30 tablets in 23cc HDPE bottle with PPCR closure
Time points
Shelf-life
specification
Initia
l
1M 2M 3M 6M
Stability
conditions
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 98.0 97.5 99.4 97.9 97.7 98.4 97.9
2. Related Substances
Procedure I
a) Impurity I
Not more
than 0.5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
b) N-Oxide
impurity
Not more
than 0.5
0.02 0.09 0.15 0.06 0.16 0.08 0.17
c) Any other
individual impurity
Not more
than 0.2
0.01
0.01
(RRT
-0.30)
0.07
(RRT
-0.64)
0.05
(RRT
-0.64)
0.12
(RRT
-0.64)
0.04
(RRT-
0.64)
0.13
(RR
T-
0.64
)
Procedure II
d) R-(-)-3-
Quinuclidinol
impurity
Not more
than 0.5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
e) Total impurities
(I and II)
Not more
than 2.0
0.05 0.15 0.29 0.17 0.39 0.16 0.37
3. Water by KF
(%)
Not more
than 8.0
5.2 4.3 5.2 4.3 4.2 5.5 4.7
4. Dissolution
NLT 80%
(Q) in 30
min.
% Drug release
30 min. 95 99 89 95 91 96 94
Stability data of Drug X Tablets, 10 mg
Packing
configuration
90 tablets in 30cc HDPE bottle with PPCR closure
Time points
Shelf-life
specification
Initia
l
1M 2M 3M 6M
Stability
conditions
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 98.0 97.4 98.7 98.4 97.1 97.7 97.5
2. Related Substances
Procedure I
a) Impurity I
Not more
than 0.5
ND 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND
b) N-Oxide
impurity
Not more
than 0.5
0.02 0.10 0.16 0.05 0.16 0.08 0.20
c) Any other
individual
impurity
Not more
than 0.2
0.01
0.01
(RRT
-0.30)
0.01
(RRT
-0.63)
0.04
(RRT
-0.64)
0.10
(RRT
-0.63)
0.04
(RRT
-0.64)
0.12
(RR
T-
0.64)
Procedure II
d) R-(-)-3-
Quinuclidinol
impurity
Not more
than 0.5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
e) Total impurities
(I and II)
Not more
than 2.0
0.05 0.15 0.30 0.14 0.36 0.17 0.39
3. Water by KF
(%)
Not more
than 8.0
5.2 3.9 5.1 4.6 3.5 3.6 5.7
4. Dissolution
NLT 80%
(Q) in 30
min.
% Drug release
30 min. 95 98 92 97 97 99 97
Stability data of Drug X Tablets, 10 mg
Packing
configuration
PVC/Aclar unit dose blister pack of 10 tablets
Time points
Shelf-life
specification
Initia
l
1M 2M 3M 6M
Stability
conditions
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
25°C/60%
RH
40°C/75%
RH
1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 98.0 97.6 98.4 98.1 97.1 97.7 97.9
2. Related Substances
Procedure I
a) Impurity I
Not more than
0.5
ND BDL ND ND ND ND ND
b) N-Oxide
impurity
Not more than
0.5
0.02 0.10 0.17 0.07 0.16 0.10 0.15
c) Any other
individual impurity
Not more than
0.2
0.01 0.01
0.09
(RRT
-0.63)
0.05
(RRT
-0.63)
0.13
(RRT-
0.64)
0.05
(RRT
-0.63)
0.15
(RR
T-
0.63
)
Procedure II
d) R-(-)-3-
Quinuclidinol
impurity
Not more than
0.5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
e) Total impurities
(I and II)
Not more than
2.0
0.05 0.13 0.33 0.20 0.43 0.20 0.38
3. Water by KF
(%)
Not more than
8.0
5.2 4.6 4.7 5.6 5.2 5.2 5.5
4. Dissolution
NLT 80% (Q)
in 30 min.
% Drug release
30 min. 95 97 91 93 93 97 98
 Test Product VS Reference Product
29
Product Test product Reference product
Strength 5 mg 10 mg 5 mg 10 mg
Brand name -
VESIcare®
Tablets, 5 mg
VESIcare®
Tablets, 10 mg
Generic Name Solifenacin succinate tablets
Appear ance
Light yellow
colored, round
tablets
debossed with
a Logo and
150
Light pink
colored, round
coated tablets
debossed with
a Logo and
151
Light yellow
colored, round
tablets
debossed with
a Logo and
150
Light pink
colored, round
coated tablets
debossed with
a Logo and
151
Tablet weight (mg)
151.00-
156.00
151.00-
155.00
155.18 154.89
Diameter (mm) 7.53-7.56 7.51-7.54 7.63 – 7.66 7.63 – 7.65
Thickness (mm) 3.51-3.56 3.49-3.56 3.51 – 3.54 3.50 – 3.54
Disintegration Time 4 min 43 sec 4 min 14 sec 5 min 23 sec 5 min 19 sec
% Assay 97.90 98.0 100.4 100.4
 References
• Chapple, C.R., Cardozo, L., Steers, W.D. and Govier, F.E., 2006. Drug significantly improves all
symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 60(8), pp.959-
966.
• Maniscalco, M., Singh-Franco, D., Wolowich, W.R. and Torres-Colón, R., 2006. Drug for the
treatment of symptoms of overactive bladder. Clinical therapeutics, 28(9), pp.1247-1272.
• Keane, D.P. and O'Sullivan, S., 2000. Urinary incontinence: anatomy, physiology and
pathophysiology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 14(2), pp.207-226.
• Sudha, R.K.V., Kishore, V.S., Babu, C.H. and Jitendranath, E., 2015. Design, Development and
Evaluation of Drug Tablets. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology, 7(2),
pp.111-117.
• Handoo, S., Arora, V., Khera, D., Nandi, P.K. and Sahu, S.K., 2012. A comprehensive study on
regulatory requirements for development and filing of generic drugs globally. International journal of
pharmaceutical investigation, 2(3), p.99.
• Kushwaha, N., Jain, A., Jain, P.K., Khare, B. and Jat, Y.S., 2022. An Overview on Formulation and
Evaluation Aspects of Tablets. Asian Journal of Dental and Health Sciences, 2(4), pp.35-39.
30
• Lusina, M., Cindrić, T., Tomaić, J., Peko, M., Pozaić, L. and Musulin, N., 2005. Stability study of
losartan/hydrochlorothiazide tablets. International journal of pharmaceutics, 291(1-2), pp.127-137.
• Abdelbary, G., Eouani, C., Prinderre, P., Joachim, J., Reynier, J.P. and Piccerelle, P.H., 2005.
Determination of the in vitro disintegration profile of rapidly disintegrating tablets and correlation
with oral disintegration. International journal of pharmaceutics, 292(1-2), pp.29-41.
• Patel, S., Kaushal, A.M. and Bansal, A.K., 2006. Compression physics in the formulation development
of tablets. Critical Reviews™ in therapeutic drug carrier systems, 23(1).
• Van Snick, B., Holman, J., Cunningham, C., Kumar, A., Vercruysse, J., De Beer, T., Remon, J.P. and
Vervaet, C., 2017. Continuous direct compression as manufacturing platform for sustained release
tablets. International journal of pharmaceutics, 519(1-2), pp.390-407.
• Rowe, R.C. and Sheskey, P.J., 2009. dan Quinn, ME Handbook of PharmaceuticalExipients. Edisi
keenam.
• Morales-Olivas, F.J. and Estañ, L., 2010. Solifenacin pharmacology. Arch Esp Urol, 63(1), pp.43-52.
• Chu, F.M. and Dmochowski, R., 2006. Pathophysiology of overactive bladder. The American journal
of medicine, 119(3), pp.3-8.
31
32

More Related Content

Similar to Formulation and Evaluation of Immediate Release Tablet for Treatment of Overactive Bladder

Formulation and evaluation of sustained release microspheres of
Formulation and evaluation of sustained release microspheres ofFormulation and evaluation of sustained release microspheres of
Formulation and evaluation of sustained release microspheres of
Reshma Fathima .K
 
Preformulation testing of solid dosage forms
Preformulation testing of solid dosage formsPreformulation testing of solid dosage forms
Preformulation testing of solid dosage forms
Sunil Boreddy Rx
 
Dissolution test.
Dissolution test.Dissolution test.
Dissolution test.
Salum Mkata
 
Eudragit NM study in matrix tablets technology
Eudragit NM study in matrix tablets technologyEudragit NM study in matrix tablets technology
Eudragit NM study in matrix tablets technology
Nikolaos Chalkidis
 
EXPANDED IN-VITRO SIMULATION OF HANDLING ERROR TO IMPROVE INHALED THERAPY OUT...
EXPANDED IN-VITRO SIMULATION OF HANDLING ERROR TO IMPROVE INHALED THERAPY OUT...EXPANDED IN-VITRO SIMULATION OF HANDLING ERROR TO IMPROVE INHALED THERAPY OUT...
EXPANDED IN-VITRO SIMULATION OF HANDLING ERROR TO IMPROVE INHALED THERAPY OUT...
iQHub
 

Similar to Formulation and Evaluation of Immediate Release Tablet for Treatment of Overactive Bladder (20)

zidovudine hplc method
zidovudine hplc method zidovudine hplc method
zidovudine hplc method
 
OECD Guidline on acute and chronic toxicity
OECD Guidline on acute and chronic toxicityOECD Guidline on acute and chronic toxicity
OECD Guidline on acute and chronic toxicity
 
validation of disso method 2.pdf
validation of disso method  2.pdfvalidation of disso method  2.pdf
validation of disso method 2.pdf
 
Residual Solvents, USP <467>
Residual Solvents, USP <467>Residual Solvents, USP <467>
Residual Solvents, USP <467>
 
Microspheres
MicrospheresMicrospheres
Microspheres
 
Formulation and evaluation of sustained release microspheres of
Formulation and evaluation of sustained release microspheres ofFormulation and evaluation of sustained release microspheres of
Formulation and evaluation of sustained release microspheres of
 
Preformulation testing of solid dosage forms
Preformulation testing of solid dosage formsPreformulation testing of solid dosage forms
Preformulation testing of solid dosage forms
 
Dissolution test.
Dissolution test.Dissolution test.
Dissolution test.
 
My final year presentation
My final year presentationMy final year presentation
My final year presentation
 
Formulation and Evaluation of Stavudine Controlled Release Matrix Tablet
Formulation and Evaluation of Stavudine Controlled Release Matrix TabletFormulation and Evaluation of Stavudine Controlled Release Matrix Tablet
Formulation and Evaluation of Stavudine Controlled Release Matrix Tablet
 
ICH guidelines
ICH guidelines ICH guidelines
ICH guidelines
 
Drug excepients compatability studies
Drug excepients compatability studiesDrug excepients compatability studies
Drug excepients compatability studies
 
Formulation and evaluation of sumatriptan succinate oral disintegrating table...
Formulation and evaluation of sumatriptan succinate oral disintegrating table...Formulation and evaluation of sumatriptan succinate oral disintegrating table...
Formulation and evaluation of sumatriptan succinate oral disintegrating table...
 
A detailed look at impurities in medicines
A detailed look at impurities in medicinesA detailed look at impurities in medicines
A detailed look at impurities in medicines
 
Dissolution chapter
Dissolution chapter Dissolution chapter
Dissolution chapter
 
Arenla Presentation.pptx
Arenla Presentation.pptxArenla Presentation.pptx
Arenla Presentation.pptx
 
Eudragit NM study in matrix tablets technology
Eudragit NM study in matrix tablets technologyEudragit NM study in matrix tablets technology
Eudragit NM study in matrix tablets technology
 
Blt PPT
Blt PPTBlt PPT
Blt PPT
 
Stability indicating assay
Stability indicating assayStability indicating assay
Stability indicating assay
 
EXPANDED IN-VITRO SIMULATION OF HANDLING ERROR TO IMPROVE INHALED THERAPY OUT...
EXPANDED IN-VITRO SIMULATION OF HANDLING ERROR TO IMPROVE INHALED THERAPY OUT...EXPANDED IN-VITRO SIMULATION OF HANDLING ERROR TO IMPROVE INHALED THERAPY OUT...
EXPANDED IN-VITRO SIMULATION OF HANDLING ERROR TO IMPROVE INHALED THERAPY OUT...
 

Recently uploaded

Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose AcademicsConnective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
MedicoseAcademics
 
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose AcademicsHistology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
MedicoseAcademics
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptxFace and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
 
Overview on the Automatic pill identifier
Overview on the Automatic pill identifierOverview on the Automatic pill identifier
Overview on the Automatic pill identifier
 
ESC HF 2024 Spotlights Day-2.pptx heart failure
ESC HF 2024 Spotlights Day-2.pptx heart failureESC HF 2024 Spotlights Day-2.pptx heart failure
ESC HF 2024 Spotlights Day-2.pptx heart failure
 
duus neurology.pdf anatomy. phisiology///
duus neurology.pdf anatomy. phisiology///duus neurology.pdf anatomy. phisiology///
duus neurology.pdf anatomy. phisiology///
 
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptxDrug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
Drug development life cycle indepth overview.pptx
 
Young & Hot ℂall Girls Salem 8250077686 WhatsApp Number Best Rates of Surat ℂ...
Young & Hot ℂall Girls Salem 8250077686 WhatsApp Number Best Rates of Surat ℂ...Young & Hot ℂall Girls Salem 8250077686 WhatsApp Number Best Rates of Surat ℂ...
Young & Hot ℂall Girls Salem 8250077686 WhatsApp Number Best Rates of Surat ℂ...
 
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE ) in children
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE ) in childrenVideo capsule endoscopy (VCE ) in children
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE ) in children
 
Signs It’s Time for Physiotherapy Sessions Prioritizing Wellness
Signs It’s Time for Physiotherapy Sessions Prioritizing WellnessSigns It’s Time for Physiotherapy Sessions Prioritizing Wellness
Signs It’s Time for Physiotherapy Sessions Prioritizing Wellness
 
Mgr university bsc nursing adult health previous question paper with answers
Mgr university  bsc nursing adult health previous question paper with answersMgr university  bsc nursing adult health previous question paper with answers
Mgr university bsc nursing adult health previous question paper with answers
 
ROSE CASE SPINAL SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
ROSE  CASE SPINAL SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATROROSE  CASE SPINAL SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
ROSE CASE SPINAL SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
 
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose AcademicsConnective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
 
Gross Anatomy and Histology of Tongue by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Gross Anatomy and Histology of Tongue by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptxGross Anatomy and Histology of Tongue by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Gross Anatomy and Histology of Tongue by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
 
Bangalore whatsapp Number Just VIP Brookefield 100% Genuine at your Door Step
Bangalore whatsapp Number Just VIP Brookefield 100% Genuine at your Door StepBangalore whatsapp Number Just VIP Brookefield 100% Genuine at your Door Step
Bangalore whatsapp Number Just VIP Brookefield 100% Genuine at your Door Step
 
Young & Hot Surat ℂall Girls Dindoli 8527049040 WhatsApp AnyTime Best Surat ℂ...
Young & Hot Surat ℂall Girls Dindoli 8527049040 WhatsApp AnyTime Best Surat ℂ...Young & Hot Surat ℂall Girls Dindoli 8527049040 WhatsApp AnyTime Best Surat ℂ...
Young & Hot Surat ℂall Girls Dindoli 8527049040 WhatsApp AnyTime Best Surat ℂ...
 
ANAPHYLAXIS BY DR.SOHAN BISWAS,MBBS,DNB(INTERNAL MEDICINE) RESIDENT.pptx
ANAPHYLAXIS BY DR.SOHAN BISWAS,MBBS,DNB(INTERNAL MEDICINE) RESIDENT.pptxANAPHYLAXIS BY DR.SOHAN BISWAS,MBBS,DNB(INTERNAL MEDICINE) RESIDENT.pptx
ANAPHYLAXIS BY DR.SOHAN BISWAS,MBBS,DNB(INTERNAL MEDICINE) RESIDENT.pptx
 
Unlocking Holistic Wellness: Addressing Depression, Mental Well-Being, and St...
Unlocking Holistic Wellness: Addressing Depression, Mental Well-Being, and St...Unlocking Holistic Wellness: Addressing Depression, Mental Well-Being, and St...
Unlocking Holistic Wellness: Addressing Depression, Mental Well-Being, and St...
 
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose AcademicsHistology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
 
Stereochemistry & Asymmetric Synthesis.pptx
Stereochemistry & Asymmetric Synthesis.pptxStereochemistry & Asymmetric Synthesis.pptx
Stereochemistry & Asymmetric Synthesis.pptx
 
How to buy 5cladba precursor raw 5cl-adb-a raw material
How to buy 5cladba precursor raw 5cl-adb-a raw materialHow to buy 5cladba precursor raw 5cl-adb-a raw material
How to buy 5cladba precursor raw 5cl-adb-a raw material
 
VIP ℂall Girls Kandivali west Mumbai 8250077686 WhatsApp: Me All Time Serviℂe...
VIP ℂall Girls Kandivali west Mumbai 8250077686 WhatsApp: Me All Time Serviℂe...VIP ℂall Girls Kandivali west Mumbai 8250077686 WhatsApp: Me All Time Serviℂe...
VIP ℂall Girls Kandivali west Mumbai 8250077686 WhatsApp: Me All Time Serviℂe...
 

Formulation and Evaluation of Immediate Release Tablet for Treatment of Overactive Bladder

  • 1. Pre Submission Seminar Presentation Formulation and Evaluation of Immediate Release Tablet for Treatment of Overactive Bladder Presented by: Bhumin Nitin Jain Guided by: M. Pharmacy 2nd Year Sem IV Dr. Monika Ola 22MPH1007 Associate Professor Dept. of Pharmaceutics 1 R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Shirpur
  • 2.  Contents • Introduction • Aim, Need and Objective • Plan of Work • Drug Profile • Excipients Profile • Materials and Instruments • Preformulation Studies • Formulation Studies • Evaluation Studies • Stability Studies • Test Product VS Reference Product • References 2
  • 3.  Introduction • Overactive bladder (OAB) is a combination of urinary symptoms that includes a sudden, strong need to urinate. Figure 1 Normal and Overactive Bladder • The major symptom of OAB is a sudden, strong urge to urinate that you can't ignore. 3 Reference:https://www.ever ydayhealth.com/overactive- bladder/causes/
  • 4. • Leak urine or have “urge incontinence.” This means urine leaks when you feel the sudden urge to go. • Urinate frequently. You may need to go to the bathroom many times during the day. • Wake up at night to pass urine.  Risk Factors for OAB: • Hormone changes • Pelvic muscle weakness or spasms • A urinary tract infection • Side effects from a medication 4 Reference:https://www.myrbetriqhcp.com/combi nation-treatment/# Figure 2 MOA of Drug
  • 5.  Aim, Need and Objective • Aim: To formulate and evaluate immediate release tablet for treatment of Overactive Bladder • Need: 1. The cost for (branded) oral tablet 10 mg is around $411 for a supply of 30 tablets. It indicates that there is strong need of generic version for affordable healthcare. 2. The data shows that number of people affected with overactive bladder is 37 million. Figure 3 No. of people affected by OAB 5 Reference:https://www.urovantmed icalaffairs.com/overview-of- overactive-bladder
  • 6. • Objective: 1. To formulate and evaluate immediate release tablets by Direct compression. 2. To study dissolution profile and to compare their drug-release profiles with (innovator) 3. To study stability of optimized formulation. 4. To compare test product with reference product. 6
  • 7.  Plan of work 1. Literature review 2. Selection of Drug and Excipients 3. Preformulation Studies 4. Formulation Development 5. Evaluation of Formulation 6. Stability Studies of Formulation 7
  • 8.  Drug Profile Drug Name Drug X Category Antimuscarinic Antagonist Molecular weight 362.465 g/mol BCS class BCS class I Half-life 45-68 hrs Log P 1.69 Solubility It is freely soluble at room temperature in water, glacial acetic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide, and methanol. 8 Table 1 Drug Profile
  • 9.  Excipients Profile 9 Parameter Lactose Monohydrate Corn Starch Hypromellose 2910 Magnesium Stearate Molecular formula C12H22O11 H2O C27H48O20 C56H108O30 C36H70MgO4 Molecular weight g/mol 360.31 692.65 1261.45 591.27 Solubility Freely soluble in water; practically insoluble in ethanol, diethyl ether and chloroform. Practically insoluble in cold ethanol and in cold water. Partially soluble in DMSO. Soluble in cold water,practically insoluble in hot water and ether, but soluble in mixtures of ethanol Practically insoluble in ethanol, ether and water; slightly soluble in warm benzene and warm ethanol. Melting point 201–2020 C 256-258OC 225–230oC 117–150o C Function Diluent / filler Disintegrant Binder Lubricant Table 2 Excipients Profile
  • 10.  Materials and Instruments 10 Sr no. Material Grade Function Supplier 1. Drug X - API Enaltec Labs Pvt. Ltd. 2. Lactose Monohydrate Super Tab 14, spray- Dried Diluent DFE Pharma 3. Corn Starch Maize Starch B Pharma Grade Disintegrant Roquette Freres 4. Hypromellose 2910 Methocel E5 Premium LV Binder Dow chemical company 5. Magnesium Stearate Hyqual, Vegetable Source Lubricant Avantor Performance materials Inc. 6. Opadry yellow Opadry yellow (03F520313) Coating Ingredient Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd. 7. Opadry pink Opadry pink (03F540267) Coating Ingredient Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd. Sr No. Equipments Name Name of Manufacturer with model 1. Weighing Balance Sartorius CP224S 2. Weighing Balance Mettler Toledo BBA422 3. Double Cone Blender Gansons 4. Compression Machine Cadmach CMB4-MT 5. Sieve Shaker Electromagnetic Sieve Shaker EMS-8 6. Vernier Caliper Mitutoyo Absolute AOS Digimatic 7. Moisture Analyzer Mettler Toledo HB43-S 8. Hardness Tester Dr. Schleuniger Pharmatron 8M 9. Friability Tester Electrolab EF-2 10. Disintegration Test Apparatus Electrolab ED-2SAPO 11. Tapped Density Apparatus Electrolab ETD-1020 12. Tablet Coating Machine Neocota 13. Differential Scanning Calorimeter Mettler DSC 1 star system, Mettler-Toledo, Switzerland 14. Dissolution Apparatus Electrolab ED-2SAPO 15. FTIR Thermo Scientific iD3 Table 3 List of Materials Table no 4 List of Instruments
  • 11.  Preformulation studies • Organoleptic properties: Table 5 Organoleptic Properties • UV Analysis: Test Results Description White Powder Taste and Odour Bitter and Odourless Loss on Drying 1.50 % Figure 4 UV Spectrum of Drug 11
  • 12. Concentration (µg/mL) Absorbance 5 0.265 10 0.437 15 0.627 20 0.824 25 0.981 30 1.134 Concentration (µg/mL) Absorbance 5 0.265 10 0.437 15 0.627 20 0.824 25 0.981 30 1.134 Table 6 Absorbance of Drug Figure 5 Calibration curve of drug in water • XRD : Figure 6 XRD Pattern of API 2θ values 3.75 7.45 11.16 14.19 18.61 19.30 20.99 23.21 25.13 Table 7 2θ Values of X-Ray 12
  • 13. • FTIR: 13 Figure 7 FTIR of Drug Type of Vibrations Standard Peakcm-1 Observed Peakcm-1 C=O 1730-1715 1716.95 C-H 3000-2500 2876.85 C≡N 2500-2000 2298.10 C=C 2000-1500 1578.61 C-N 1500-1000 1352.98 S-O 700-500 548.29 Table 8 Reported IR Frequency of Drug
  • 14. • Melting Point: 1) Capillary Rise Method: 2) Differential scanning calorimetry: The melting point of Drug X was confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry which was performed at the scanning rate of 10°C/min with 80 mL/min of nitrogen purging. It was confirmed with the reported melting point of i.e., Drug X ranges between 144-149°C. 14 Standard Observed 144 – 149 °C 145 – 151 °C Table no 9 Melting Point Figure no 8 DSC Curve of drug
  • 15. • Particle Size Determination: Conclusion: From above study, it was found that Drug used for observation was relatively fine. • Sieve Analysis: 15 Specification Particle Size d (10) 11 um d (50) 36 um d (90) 73 um Sieve Sizes Initial weight of sieves Final weight of sieves Difference in weights % retained Cumulative % retained 20# 366.6 366.6 0 0 0 40# 328.8 328.8 0 0 0 60# 334.2 338.0 3.8 19 19 80# 336.8 344.8 8.0 40 59 100# 328.0 331.6 3.6 18 77 Pan 531.6 536.2 4.6 23 100 Total 20.0 Conclusion: Drug was passed from respective sieves using sieve shaker and cumulative % retained was calculated . Table no 10 Particle Size Determination Table no 11 Sieve Analysis of drug
  • 16. • Flow Property: Conclusion: Based on the findings, Flow character of Lubricated blend is Passable. 16 Properties Characters Bulk Density 0.571 gm/ml Tap Density 0.762 gm/ml Compressibility Index 25.065 % Hausner’s Ratio 1.335 Table no 12 Flow Property
  • 17. • Drug-Excipient Compatibility Study 17 API Excipients Ratio used Drug X - - Drug X Lactose monohydrate (SuperTab 14SD) 1:21.4 Drug X Corn starch (Maize Starch B Pharma Grade) 1:6.3 Drug X Hypromellose 2910 (Methocel E5 Premium LV) 1:1.2 Drug X Magnesium stearate (Hyqual, Vegetable Source) 1:0.1 Drug X Opadry pink (03F540267) 1:0.45 Drug X Opadry yellow (03F520313) 1:0.90 Drug X All excipients (for 5 mg strength) 1:21.4:6.3:1.2:0.1:0.90 Drug X All excipients (for 10 mg strength) 1:21.4:6.3:1.2:0.1:0.45 Figure 9 Normal overlay diffractogram scan of API, Drug X tablets , 5 mg and Drug X tablets , 5 mg Placebo Figure 10 Normal overlay diffractogram scan of API, Drug X tablets, 10 mg and Drug X tablets, 10 mg Placebo The X-ray diffractogram DrugX API, Drug X tablets 5 and 10 mg, and Drug X tablets 5 and 10 mg placebo has shown sharp peaks at different angles (2ϴ) 13.5°, 15.5°, 17.6°, 18.1° and 21.8°. Table 13 Ratio of API & Excipients used
  • 18. 18 Stability condition – Initial Binary mixture Ratio Assay (%w/w) Related Substances (%w/w) Method I Method II Total Impu rities (Met hod I and II) Impuri ty-I N- Oxide impuri ty Any other individ ual impurit y R-(-)-3- Quinucli dinol impurity (Imp.-E) 90.0 – 110.0 NMT 0.5 NMT 0.5 NMT 0.2 NMT 0.5 NMT 2.0 Drug XAPI - 99.90 0.002 0.015 0.030 ND 0.096 Drug X+ SuperTab 14SD 1:21. 4 99.94 0.006 0.014 0.018 ND 0.059 Drug X+ Maize Starch B Pharma Grade 1:6.3 99.94 0.004 0.019 0.013 ND 0.064 Drug X+ Methocel E5 Premium LV 1:1.2 99.91 0.006 0.017 0.027 ND 0.089 Drug X+ Hyqual, Vegetable Source 1:0.1 99.94 0.004 0.017 0.017 ND 0.065 Drug X+ Opadry Yellow 0.3F520313 1:0.9 0 99.94 0.005 0.019 0.019 ND 0.058 Drug X+ Opadry Pink 03F540267 1:0.4 5 99.93 0.002 0.018 0.020 ND 0.069 Drug X+ all excipient for 5 mg strength - 99.93 0.004 0.026 0.021 ND 0.069 Drug X+ all excipients for 10 mg strength - 99.93 0.003 0.009 0.033 ND 0.071 Stability condition – 60°C/80% RH; 1M (Open) Binary mixture Ratio Assay (% w/w) Related Substances (% w/w) Method I Method II Total Impur ities (Method I and II) Impur ity-I N-Oxide impur ity Any other individual impur ity R-(-)-3- Quinuclidinol impur ity (Imp.-E) 90.0 – 110.0 NMT 0.5 NMT 0.5 NMT 0.2 NMT 0.5 NMT 2.0 Drug X API - 99.91 0.002 0.022 0.029 ND 0.091 Drug X + SuperTab 14SD 1:21.4 99.93 0.004 0.023 0.021 ND 0.067 Drug X + Maize Starch B Pharma Grade 1:6.3 99.94 0.004 0.025 0.015 ND 0.066 Drug X + Methocel E5 Premium LV 1:1.2 99.91 0.004 0.021 0.032 ND 0.091 Drug X + Hyqual, Vegetable Source 1:0.1 99.93 0.003 0.021 0.015 ND 0.071 Drug X + Opadry Yellow 0.3F520313 1:0.90 99.91 0.004 0.027 0.017 ND 0.091 Drug X + Opadry Pink 03F540267 1:0.45 99.92 0.002 0.024 0.027 ND 0.078 Drug X + all excipient for 5 mg strength - 99.92 0.004 0.027 0.021 ND 0.075 Drug X + all excipients for 10 mg strength - 99.91 0.003 0.021 0.043 ND 0.090 Table no 14 Initial data of drug-excipient compatibility study Table no 15 Stability data of drug-excipient compatibility study
  • 19.  Formulation studies Trial no. Trial name Observations 1. To take trial batch by DC and to study physicochemical parameters All parameters were found satisfactory and meet the specification. Dissolution of generic Drug X tablets, 10 mg was observed more than 85% in 15 minutes. 2. To take trial batch using reduced particle size to study impact on dissolution of drug It was concluded that reduced API PSD has no impact on dissolution of drug product. 3. To take trial batch 5mg using reduced particle size of API to study impact on dissolution of drug It was concluded that reduced API PSD has no impact on dissolution of drug product. 19 Sr. No. Name of Ingredient Qty (mg) / tablet T1 (10 mg) T2 (10 mg) T3 (5 mg) Optimized Batch 5 mg 10 mg 1. Drug X 10.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 2. Lactose Monohydrate 102.00 125.00 130.00 130. 00 125.0 0 3. Corn Starch 31.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 4. Hypromellose 2910 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5. Magnesium Stearate 0.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 6. Opadry Pink 3.75 3.75 - - 3.75 7. Opadry Yellow - - 3.75 3.75 - 8. Purified Water q.s q.s q.s q.s q.s
  • 20. 20 Trial no Dose Tablet wt. (mg) Thickness (mm) Diameter (mm) Hardness (N) Friability (% w/w) Assay (% w/w) D.T Time T1 10 mg 146.0 - 153.0 3.35 -3.40 7.51 - 7.52 39 -55 0.22 99.0 3-4 min T2 10 mg 149.1 – 152.3 3.46 – 3.49 7.52 – 7.54 45 -50 0.09 98.2 4-5 min T3 5 mg 148.3 – 154.9 3.39 – 3.46 7.50 – 7.53 37 -47 0.11 96.9 4-5 min Optimi- zed Batch 5 mg 149.00 – 156.00 3.44 - 3.52 7.49 -7.52 41 – 49 0.13 97.90 4 min 13 sec 10 mg 146.00 – 154.00 3.40 – 3.47 7.53 -7.55 43-51 0.10 98.0 3 min 50 sec Trial no Tablet wt. (mg) Thickness (mm) Diameter (mm) D.T Time T1 149.0 – 163.0 3.39 – 3.51 7.54 – 7.57 4-5 min T2 148.8 – 154.3 3.43 – 3.47 7.52 – 7.55 5-6 min T3 148.9 – 155.2 3.42 – 3.49 7.52 – 7.55 5-6 min Optimized Batch 5 mg 151 – 156 3.51 – 3.56 7.53 -7.56 4 min 43 sec 10 mg 151 – 156 3.49 – 3.56 7.51 -7.54 4 min 14 sec Table no 16 Physical In process Parameters of Core Tablets Table no 17 Physical In process Parameters of Coated Tablets
  • 21. • In Vitro Dissolution Release 1) Trial Batch 1 21 Batch No. (RLD) Trial batch 1 Dissolution conditions USP II/900 mL Water/50 rpm Time (Minutes) % Drug release % RSD % Drug release % RSD 10 67 7.05 64 14.8 15 88 5.23 91 7.91 30 101 1.84 97 4.9 45 101 1.49 97 5.08 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 % Drug release Time (min.) Comparative dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 10 mg in water RLD Trial batch 1 Table no 18 Dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 10 mg in water Figure no 11 Dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 10 mg
  • 22. 2) Trial Batch 2 22 Impact of particle size on % drug release of drug product Batch No. (API with d90: 110.38 µm) (API with d90: 45.2 µm) Dissolution condition USP II/900 mL Water/50 rpm Time (Minutes) % Drug release % RSD % Drug release % RSD 10 64 14.8 60 29.9 15 91 7.91 82 15.72 30 97 4.9 94 2.81 45 97 5.08 96 2.7 0 50 100 150 0 10 20 30 40 50 % Dr ug r elease Time (min.) Dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 10 mg with different API PSD d90:110.38µm d90: 45.2µm Table no 19 Dissolution profile of Drug X tablets, 10 mg with different API PSD Figure no 12 Dissolution profile of Drug X tablets, 10 mg with different API PSD
  • 23. 3) Trial Batch 3 23 Batch No. (RLD) Trial batch 3 Dissolution condition USP II/900 mL Water/50 rpm Time (Minutes) % Drug release % RSD % Drug release % RSD 10 37 15.89 55 16.79 15 72 12.33 73 14.0 30 97 2.48 90 2.02 45 97 1.01 96 2.77 F2 value 50.59 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 % Drug release Time (min.) Comparative dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 5 mg in water RLD Trial batch 3 Table no 20 Dissolution profiles of RLD and Drug X tablets, 5 mg Figure no 13 Dissolution profiles of RLD and Drug X tablets, 5 mg
  • 24. • Optimized Batch Table 21 Multimedia dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 5 mg Figure 14 Multimedia dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 5 mg Table 22 Multimedia dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 10 mg 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 % Drug release TIme (min.) Multimedia dissolution profile of solifenacin succinate tablets, 10 mg Water 0.1N HCl pH 4.5 acetate buffer pH 6.8 phosphate buffer Figure 15 Multimedia dissolution profiles of Drug X tablets, 10 mg 24 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 % Drug release TIme (min.) Water 0.1N HCl pH 4.5 acetate buffer pH 6.8 phosphate buffer Product Drug XTablets, 5 mg Dissoluti on conditio n USP II / 900 mL water / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL 0.1 N HCl / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL pH 4.5 acetate buffer / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL pH 6.8 phosphate buffer / 50 rpm Time (minutes ) % Release % RSD % Release % RSD % Release % RSD % Release % RSD 10 49 28.55 44 26.01 47 18.32 49 23.15 15 75 18.98 72 24.37 79 13.64 76 16.93 30 96 4.03 101 1.48 101 0.51 92 2.94 45 97 3.5 102 1.66 101 0.93 93 2.13 Product Drug X tablets, 10 mg Dissoluti on condition USP II / 900 mL water / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL 0.1 N HCl / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL pH 4.5 acetate buffer / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL pH 6.8 phosphate buffer / 50 rpm Time (minutes) % Release % RSD % Release % RSD % Release % RSD % Release % RSD 10 59 29.5 65 9.98 67 15.23 61 22.82 15 78 22.62 84 8.22 90 11.19 82 17.86 30 97 1.42 98 1.8 100 1.27 93 1.65 45 97 1.55 98 1.41 100 1.59 93 1.24
  • 25. • RLD Dissolution 25 Product Innovator drug , 5 mg Dissolution condition USP II / 900 mL water / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL 0.1 N HCl / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL pH 4.5 acetate buffer / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL pH 6.8 phosphate buffer / 50 rpm Time (minutes) % Release % RSD % Release % RSD % Release % RSD % Release % RSD 10 37 15.89 53 7.68 62 5.83 37 23.69 15 72 12.33 72 6.54 86 4.69 56 20.78 30 97 2.48 94 4.3 101 2.58 81 8.47 45 97 1.01 99 2.45 102 1.69 85 3.6 Table 23 Multimedia dissolution profile of Innovator drug , 5 mg 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 % Drug Release Time (min.) Water 0.1N HCl pH 4.5 acetate buffer pH 6.8 phosphate buffer Figure 16 Multimedia dissolution profile of Innovator drug , 5 mg Product Innovator drug , 10 mg Dissolution condition USP II / 900 mL water / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL 0.1 N HCl / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL pH 4.5 acetate buffer / 50 rpm USP II / 900 mL pH 6.8 phosphate buffer / 50 rpm Time (minutes) % Release % RSD % Release % RSD % Release % RSD % Release % RSD 10 67 7.05 60 5.54 48 28.37 48 30.06 15 88 5.23 79 5.64 70 23.68 69 23.91 30 101 1.84 99 1.65 97 6.55 92 9.39 45 101 1.49 102 1.35 100 2.04 95 2.27 Table 24 Multimedia dissolution profile of Innovator drug , 10 mg 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 % Drug Release Time (min.) Water 0.1N HCl pH 4.5 acetate buffer pH 6.8 phosphate buffer Figure 17 Multimedia dissolution profile of Innovator drug , 10 mg
  • 26.  Evaluation Studies 26 Trial no Dose Tablet wt. (mg) Thickness( mm) Diameter( mm) Hardness( N) Friability( % w/w) Assay(% w/w) T1 10 mg 146.0 - 153.0 3.35 -3.40 7.51 - 7.52 39 -55 0.22 99.0 T2 10 mg 149.1 – 152.3 3.46 – 3.49 7.52 – 7.54 45 -50 0.09 98.2 T3 5 mg 148.3 – 154.9 3.39 – 3.46 7.50 – 7.53 37 -47 0.11 96.9 Optimi- zed Batch 5 mg 149.00 – 156.00 3.44 - 3.52 7.49 -7.52 41 – 49 0.13 97.90 10 mg 146.00 – 154.00 3.40 – 3.47 7.53 -7.55 43- 51 0.10 98.0 RLD 5 mg 146.00- 157.00 3.44- 3.51 7.48- 7.53 40- 49 0.13 100.4 10 mg 145.00- 154.00 3.39-3.47 7.52-7.58 40- 50 0.10 100.4
  • 27.  Stability Studies 27 Stability data of Drug X tablets, 5 mg Packing configuration 30 tablets in 23cc HDPE bottle with PPCR closure Time points Shelf-life specification Initia l 1M 2M 3M 6M Stability conditions 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 97.7 98.0 97.4 98.6 98.3 98.1 97. 4 2. Related Substances Procedure I a) Impurity I Not more than 0.5 ND BDL ND ND ND ND ND b) N-Oxide impurity Not more than 0.5 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.06 0.13 0.09 0.1 3 c) Any other individual impurity Not more than 0.2 0.01 0.02 0.09 (RRT -0.63) 0.09 (RRT -0.63) 0.14 (RRT- 0.63) 0.09 (RRT -0.64) 0.1 6 (RR T- 0.6 4) Procedure II d) R-(-)-3- Quinuclidinol impurity Not more than 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND e) Total impurities (I and II) Not more than 2.0 0.05 0.16 0.30 0.25 0.40 0.20 0.4 0 3. Water by KF (%) Not more than 8.0 4.9 5.5 5.0 4.8 4.9 4.1 5.2 4. Dissolution NLT 80% (Q) in 30 min. % Drug release 30 min. 98 97 93 99 99 92 90 Stability data of Drug X Tablets, 5 mg Packing configuration 90 tablets in 30cc HDPE bottle with PPCR closure Time points Shelf-life specification Initial 1M 2M 3M 6M Stability conditions 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 97.9 97.7 97.2 98.3 97.9 97.5 96. 4 2. Related Substances Procedure I a) Impurity I Not more than 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND b) N-Oxide impurity Not more than 0.5 0.03 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.14 0.11 0.1 6 c) Any other individual impurity Not more than 0.2 0.01 0.01 (RRT- 0.48) 0.09 (RRT- 0.64) 0.07 (RRT- 0.64) 0.13 (RRT- 0.63) 0.06 (RRT- 0.64) 0.1 5 (RR T- 0.6 4) Procedure II d) R-(-)-3- Quinuclidinol impurity Not more than 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND e) Total impurities (I and II) Not more than 2.0 0.05 0.13 0.31 0.20 0.39 0.23 0.4 3 3. Water by KF (%) Not more than 8.0 4.9 4.8 4.7 5.2 5.1 3.6 4.0 4. Dissolution NLT 80% (Q) in 30 min. % Drug release 30 min. 98 98 96 98 97 95 93 Stability data of Dr ug X Tablets, 5 mg Packing configuration PVC/Aclar unit dose blister pack of 10 tablets Time points Shelf-life specification Initia l 1M 2M 3M 6M Stability conditions 40°C/75%RH 25°C/60%RH 40°C/75%RH 25°C/60%RH 40°C/75%RH 1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 97.9 97.7 97.3 98.0 97.3 97.3 96.5 2. Related Substances Pr ocedur e I a) Impurity I Not more than 0.5 ND BDL ND ND ND ND ND b) N-Oxide impurity Not more than 0.5 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.08 0.11 0.10 0.11 c) Any other individual impurity Not more than 0.2 0.01 0.02 (RRT -0.23) 0.11 (RRT -0.64) 0.06 (RRT -0.63) 0.16 (RRT- 0.63) 0.06 (RRT - 0.64) 0.19 (RR T- 0.6 4) Pr ocedur e II d) R-(-)-3- Quinuclidinol impurity Not more than 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND e) Total impurities (I and II) Not more than 2.0 0.05 0.15 0.35 0.20 0.42 0.22 0.41 3. Water by KF (%) Not more than 8.0 4.9 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.5 3.4 5.5 4. Dissolution NLT 80% (Q) in 30 min. % Dr ug r elease 30 min. 98 99 96 97 94 94 93
  • 28. 28 Stability data of Drug X Tablets, 10 mg Packing configuration 30 tablets in 23cc HDPE bottle with PPCR closure Time points Shelf-life specification Initia l 1M 2M 3M 6M Stability conditions 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 98.0 97.5 99.4 97.9 97.7 98.4 97.9 2. Related Substances Procedure I a) Impurity I Not more than 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND b) N-Oxide impurity Not more than 0.5 0.02 0.09 0.15 0.06 0.16 0.08 0.17 c) Any other individual impurity Not more than 0.2 0.01 0.01 (RRT -0.30) 0.07 (RRT -0.64) 0.05 (RRT -0.64) 0.12 (RRT -0.64) 0.04 (RRT- 0.64) 0.13 (RR T- 0.64 ) Procedure II d) R-(-)-3- Quinuclidinol impurity Not more than 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND e) Total impurities (I and II) Not more than 2.0 0.05 0.15 0.29 0.17 0.39 0.16 0.37 3. Water by KF (%) Not more than 8.0 5.2 4.3 5.2 4.3 4.2 5.5 4.7 4. Dissolution NLT 80% (Q) in 30 min. % Drug release 30 min. 95 99 89 95 91 96 94 Stability data of Drug X Tablets, 10 mg Packing configuration 90 tablets in 30cc HDPE bottle with PPCR closure Time points Shelf-life specification Initia l 1M 2M 3M 6M Stability conditions 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 98.0 97.4 98.7 98.4 97.1 97.7 97.5 2. Related Substances Procedure I a) Impurity I Not more than 0.5 ND 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND b) N-Oxide impurity Not more than 0.5 0.02 0.10 0.16 0.05 0.16 0.08 0.20 c) Any other individual impurity Not more than 0.2 0.01 0.01 (RRT -0.30) 0.01 (RRT -0.63) 0.04 (RRT -0.64) 0.10 (RRT -0.63) 0.04 (RRT -0.64) 0.12 (RR T- 0.64) Procedure II d) R-(-)-3- Quinuclidinol impurity Not more than 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND e) Total impurities (I and II) Not more than 2.0 0.05 0.15 0.30 0.14 0.36 0.17 0.39 3. Water by KF (%) Not more than 8.0 5.2 3.9 5.1 4.6 3.5 3.6 5.7 4. Dissolution NLT 80% (Q) in 30 min. % Drug release 30 min. 95 98 92 97 97 99 97 Stability data of Drug X Tablets, 10 mg Packing configuration PVC/Aclar unit dose blister pack of 10 tablets Time points Shelf-life specification Initia l 1M 2M 3M 6M Stability conditions 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 25°C/60% RH 40°C/75% RH 1. Assay (% w/w) 90.0 – 110.0 98.0 97.6 98.4 98.1 97.1 97.7 97.9 2. Related Substances Procedure I a) Impurity I Not more than 0.5 ND BDL ND ND ND ND ND b) N-Oxide impurity Not more than 0.5 0.02 0.10 0.17 0.07 0.16 0.10 0.15 c) Any other individual impurity Not more than 0.2 0.01 0.01 0.09 (RRT -0.63) 0.05 (RRT -0.63) 0.13 (RRT- 0.64) 0.05 (RRT -0.63) 0.15 (RR T- 0.63 ) Procedure II d) R-(-)-3- Quinuclidinol impurity Not more than 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND e) Total impurities (I and II) Not more than 2.0 0.05 0.13 0.33 0.20 0.43 0.20 0.38 3. Water by KF (%) Not more than 8.0 5.2 4.6 4.7 5.6 5.2 5.2 5.5 4. Dissolution NLT 80% (Q) in 30 min. % Drug release 30 min. 95 97 91 93 93 97 98
  • 29.  Test Product VS Reference Product 29 Product Test product Reference product Strength 5 mg 10 mg 5 mg 10 mg Brand name - VESIcare® Tablets, 5 mg VESIcare® Tablets, 10 mg Generic Name Solifenacin succinate tablets Appear ance Light yellow colored, round tablets debossed with a Logo and 150 Light pink colored, round coated tablets debossed with a Logo and 151 Light yellow colored, round tablets debossed with a Logo and 150 Light pink colored, round coated tablets debossed with a Logo and 151 Tablet weight (mg) 151.00- 156.00 151.00- 155.00 155.18 154.89 Diameter (mm) 7.53-7.56 7.51-7.54 7.63 – 7.66 7.63 – 7.65 Thickness (mm) 3.51-3.56 3.49-3.56 3.51 – 3.54 3.50 – 3.54 Disintegration Time 4 min 43 sec 4 min 14 sec 5 min 23 sec 5 min 19 sec % Assay 97.90 98.0 100.4 100.4
  • 30.  References • Chapple, C.R., Cardozo, L., Steers, W.D. and Govier, F.E., 2006. Drug significantly improves all symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 60(8), pp.959- 966. • Maniscalco, M., Singh-Franco, D., Wolowich, W.R. and Torres-Colón, R., 2006. Drug for the treatment of symptoms of overactive bladder. Clinical therapeutics, 28(9), pp.1247-1272. • Keane, D.P. and O'Sullivan, S., 2000. Urinary incontinence: anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 14(2), pp.207-226. • Sudha, R.K.V., Kishore, V.S., Babu, C.H. and Jitendranath, E., 2015. Design, Development and Evaluation of Drug Tablets. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology, 7(2), pp.111-117. • Handoo, S., Arora, V., Khera, D., Nandi, P.K. and Sahu, S.K., 2012. A comprehensive study on regulatory requirements for development and filing of generic drugs globally. International journal of pharmaceutical investigation, 2(3), p.99. • Kushwaha, N., Jain, A., Jain, P.K., Khare, B. and Jat, Y.S., 2022. An Overview on Formulation and Evaluation Aspects of Tablets. Asian Journal of Dental and Health Sciences, 2(4), pp.35-39. 30
  • 31. • Lusina, M., Cindrić, T., Tomaić, J., Peko, M., Pozaić, L. and Musulin, N., 2005. Stability study of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide tablets. International journal of pharmaceutics, 291(1-2), pp.127-137. • Abdelbary, G., Eouani, C., Prinderre, P., Joachim, J., Reynier, J.P. and Piccerelle, P.H., 2005. Determination of the in vitro disintegration profile of rapidly disintegrating tablets and correlation with oral disintegration. International journal of pharmaceutics, 292(1-2), pp.29-41. • Patel, S., Kaushal, A.M. and Bansal, A.K., 2006. Compression physics in the formulation development of tablets. Critical Reviews™ in therapeutic drug carrier systems, 23(1). • Van Snick, B., Holman, J., Cunningham, C., Kumar, A., Vercruysse, J., De Beer, T., Remon, J.P. and Vervaet, C., 2017. Continuous direct compression as manufacturing platform for sustained release tablets. International journal of pharmaceutics, 519(1-2), pp.390-407. • Rowe, R.C. and Sheskey, P.J., 2009. dan Quinn, ME Handbook of PharmaceuticalExipients. Edisi keenam. • Morales-Olivas, F.J. and Estañ, L., 2010. Solifenacin pharmacology. Arch Esp Urol, 63(1), pp.43-52. • Chu, F.M. and Dmochowski, R., 2006. Pathophysiology of overactive bladder. The American journal of medicine, 119(3), pp.3-8. 31
  • 32. 32