Different decisions in co-design: How can different decisions in co-design affect the outcomes of design around Europe?

1. DIFFERENT METHODS OF CO-DESIGN:
HOW CAN DIFFERENT DECISIONS IN CO-DESIGN AFFECT
THE OUTCOMES IN DESIGN AROUND EUROPE?
BY MICHAEL SOLAYMANTASH

2. Introduction to Co-design
What makes a co-design project?
 Co-design structure
 Design criteria
 Ideas
 Concept
 Prototype
 Product
 Diverse group with invested interest in the outcome;
 Designers
 Participants
 External stakeholders
 Project leader
 Tools and dialogue to engage the group
 Participant-centric outcomes

3. Objective
 Investigate methods of building relationships between stakeholders.
 Investigate the roles which stakeholders play and who should be invited to
participate.
 Find out what tools partners use and how they encourage people to work.
 Investigate how the projects encourage stakeholders to be creative.
 Study the main challenges faced by stakeholders in Co-design.
 Find out how the processes of some outcomes are evaluated.

4. Approach
Past literature
Field research
 Surveys
 Interviews

5. Research findings
 Time management
 Framing the project
 Meeting the objectives
 Participant selection
 Activity location
 Co-design awareness
 Generating enthusiasm
 Participant diversity
 Stakeholder management
 Elitist behaviour
 Media attention and political culture

6. Conclusion and Critical insights
 Location of activity base
 Facilitating the elitist behaviour in designers
 Participants who challenge the project
 Maintaining the momentum within projects
 Creating positive media attention towards co-design

7. Proposal
• Is co-location needed for co-design?

8. Proposal
What are the active roles in Co-design?

9. Proposal
Traditional Design Vs Co-design

10. Next Steps
• Building a Co-design Infobase
– Capture
• Consistent levels of information
– Analyse
• Success rate of co-design overall
• Success rate of individual designers
– Publish/Learn
• Patterns within co-design

11. Questions

12. References
U
A
E
L
Urban Squares Author. (2014). The world of urban squares: A collection and analysis of rediscovered public spaces. Available: http://www.urbansquares.com/. Last accessed 18th May 2014.
Arvola, Mattias, A. and Artman. H. (2006). "Interaction walkthroughs and improvised role play." Design and semantics of form and movement. p3.
Engaging Lanier, J (2010). cities Author. You Are (2014). Not a Gadget: Engaging A cities: Manifesto. Tools London: for civic Penguin activism. UK Available: . 17-120.
Engagingcities.com. Last accessed 21st May 2014
V
B
Engine. M
(2013). Kent County Council: Building a Social Innovation Lab to develop services. Available: http://enginegroup.co.uk/work/kcc-social-innovation-lab. Last accessed 18th May 2014.
Vaajakallio, K (2012). Design games: A tool, a mindset and a structure. Helsinki: Aalto University publication series. p203.
Bonacorsi, S. (2008). What is… an Affinity Diagram?. Available: http://www.improvementandinnovation.com/features/article/what-affinity-diagram/. Last accessed 18th May 2014.
M, Essex Roberts engagement and C, Greed toolkit (2001). Author. Approaching (2014). What Urban is Public Design. Engagement?. Harlow: Pearsons.
Available: http://www.essexengagementtoolkit.org/overview/what-is-public-engagement/. Last accessed 30th May 2014.
W
Britz, Galen C., ed. Improving performance through statistical thinking. ASQ Quality Press, 2000.
F
Morelli, N. & Tollestrup, C. (2007). New representation techniques for designing in a systematic perspective. Aalborg: Aalborg University, Institute of Architecture and design. p2 - p7.
Wittenberg, V. (2012). Test-station Beukenlaan. Available: http://www.vincentwittenberg.com/index.php?/portfolio/proefstation-beukenlaan/. Last accessed 21st May 2014.
C
Frick, N
Elisabetta, Stefano Tardini, and Lorenzo Cantoni. "LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®." (2013).
Wagner, et al., 2009
Cantoni L., Marchiori E., Faré M., Botturi L., Bolchini D. (2009). A systematic methodology to use LEGO bricks in web communication design. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM international
Conference on Design of Communication (Bloomington, Indiana, USA, October 05 - 07, 2009). SIGDOC '09. ACM, New York, NY, 187-192.
NASA Author. (2014). NASA Open Government Plan—Appendix: Citizen Engagement Analysis. Available: http://www.nasa.gov/open/plan/citizen-engagement.html. Last accessed 21st May 2014.
G
Z
P
Carrie Chan. (2012). directCare: enhancing hospital services. Available: http://thinkcarrie.com/thesis-project/. Last accessed 18th May 2014.
Gordon, L. (2009). How to Prototype: The Awesome Guide. Available: http://thesquigglyline.com/2009/01/15/how-to-prototype-the-awesome-guide/. Last accessed 18th May 2014.
Zamarato, M. (2008). NARRATIVE DESIGN. Available: http://www.interaction-venice.com/projects/iuav-thesis/2008n/narrative-design/. Last accessed 19th May 2014.
Putt, J. (2013). Conducting research with Indigenous people and communities. Indigenous Justice Clearinghouse.
Christiansen, J., & Bunt, L. (2012). Innovation in policy: allowing for creativity, social complexity and uncertainty in public governance. NESTA report.
Greenberg. S, Et. Al (2006), paper, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Canada
S
CQI H
conference 2012 (2012). The Lowitja Institute National Conference on Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health care. Australia: Australian
Government Initiative. p2-13.
Sanders, Elizabeth B-N. Brandt, E, & Binder, T. (2010), "A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design." Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design
conference. ACM.
Hagenaars, B., & Huybrechts, L. (2013, April). Cultivating Communities Participatory scenario making: a tool for engaging and enabling local communities in reshaping their living environment. In
Crafting the Future. 10th European Academy of Design Conference. (Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 91-91).
Cruickshank, L., Whitham, R., & Morris, L. (2012, August). Innovation through the design of knowledge exchange and the design of knowledge exchange design. In International Design
Management Research Conference. Boston, USA.
Scoobyfoo. (2006). RentAThing: Applied Dreams 2.2 Presentation. Available: https://www.flickr.com/photos/scoobyfoo/sets/72057594083488682/. Last accessed 19th May 2014.
Healthy places and spaces Author. (2014). Healthy places and spaces. Available: http://healthyplaces.org.au/site/. Last accessed 19th May 2014.
D
Shade. J. (2000). Improving Performance Through Statistical Thinking, McGraw-Hill.
I
Dede, O. M., Dİkmen, Ç. B., & Ayten, A. M (2012). A new approach for participative urban design: An urban design study of Cumhuriyet urban square in Yozgat Turkey. Yozgat: Journal of
Soy, Geography S. K.. (2006). and Regional The Case Planning. Study as p2 a Research - p9.
Method. Available: https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~ssoy/usesusers/l391d1b.htm. Last accessed 8th Aug 2014.
Iacucci, Giulio, Kari Kuutti, and Mervi Ranta. "On the move with a magic thing: role playing in concept design of mobile services and devices." Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing
Sui. interactive Et. al (2003). systems: A fuzzy processes, quality practices, function deployment methods, and system techniques. for buildable ACM, 2000.
design decision-makings. Automation in construction, 12(4), 381-393.
Desouza, K. C. (2003). Facilitating tacit knowledge exchange. Communications of the ACM, 46(6), 85-88.
Into T
D'mentia. (2013). EXPERIENCE DEMENTIA MORE REALISTICALLY THAN EVER. Available: http://www.intodmentia.com/howitworks2. Last accessed 20th May 2014.
Desouza, K. C., & Awazu, Y. (2006). Knowledge management at SMEs: five peculiarities. Journal of knowledge management, 10(1), 32-43.
Donald W. Emerling, Lynne B. Hare, Roger Wesley Hoerl, Stuart J. Janis,
K
Team. (2008). Designing with lego. Available: http://www.sketchin.ch/it/blog/design/progettare-con-i-lego%C2%AE.html. Last accessed 18th May 2014.
Kara Tippett, B, Küçükerbaş J, Connelly, E.A V & (2001). How, F. Democratic "You Want Approach Me to Do to What? Design Teach of Urban a Studio Squares, Class http://to Seventy egeweb.Students?." ege.edu.Journal tr/zfdergi/for edergiziraat/, Education in the Last Built accessed Environment 18th May 6.2 2014.
(2011): 26-53.
Ketso Turkle, Author. S (2011). (2014). Alone Ketso: together The : hands why we on expect Kit for more creative from engagement. technology and Available: less from http://each www.other. ketso.New com/York: examples-Basic Books. case-18-studies/76.
stakeholder-engagement. Last accessed 20th May 2014.
Kraff, H., & Jernsand, E. M. (2013). Participatory design tools in place branding. In Crafting the Future: 10th European Academy of Design Conference (Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-14).