SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS
FOR THE SUSSEX POLICE:
FACEBOOK
01.04.2020
Nihari Weerasinghe
Kun Qin
Bernadett Toth
Teresa Cerny
Amalia Ionete
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Meaningful Patterns ....................................................................................................................2
Performance and Trends............................................................................................................ 2
SXP Approach............................................................................................................................ 4
Recommended Improvements....................................................................................................5
Driving Penetration......................................................................................................................7
Virality Beyond Social ................................................................................................................ 7
Categorizing Success................................................................................................................ 11
Validity of Hashtags................................................................................................................. 12
Benchmarking............................................................................................................................ 13
Attainment Benchmarks – The Platform.................................................................................... 13
Methodology....................................................................................................................... 13
Limitations.......................................................................................................................... 14
Keyfindings......................................................................................................................... 15
Recommendations............................................................................................................... 16
Expectations for reach and impression ....................................................................................... 16
Key findingsand recommendations .......................................................................................... 17
Links vs No Links, Photos vs Video.............................................................................................. 18
Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 18
Limitations.............................................................................................................................. 18
District’s top 10 posts with the highest reach ........................................................................ 19
District’s bottom 10 posts with lowest reach......................................................................... 19
Key findingsand recommendations .......................................................................................... 20
Demographic Insights................................................................................................................. 21
Survey Result............................................................................................................................. 22
References................................................................................................................................. 23
Appendices................................................................................................................................ 24
Appendix 1.............................................................................................................................. 24
Appendix 2.............................................................................................................................. 30
2
MEANINGFUL PATTERNS
PERFORMANCE AND TRENDS
PLEASE CHANGE THE FONT AND WRITING TO MATCH THE REST OF THE TEXT
Arun:
WORDS:
HOGHEST 10 SHARED: 35-61 WORDS
HIGHEST 10 LIKED: 11- 94 WORDS
HIGHEST 10 COMMENTS: 37 – 86 WORDS
HIGHEST 10 REACH: 32 – 85 WORDS
THESE ARE THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST NUMBER OF WORDS USED FOR CAPTION FOR
THE POSTS WITH THE MOST ENGAGEMENT. THE ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT MOST
SUCCESFULL ONES ARE BETWEEN 40 TO 60 WORDS WITH MOST OF THEM BENING
AROUND 45-54 WORDS.
WHEN IT COMES TO THE LOWER VALUES, WE LOOK AT EITHER TOO MANY OR TOO FEW
WORDS. FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE LOOK AT THE TOP 10 LOWEST VALUES FOR THE
CATEGORIES PRESENTED BEFORE WE CAN SEE THAT WHILE SOME OF THE POSTS ARE
STILL IN THE 40-60 WORDS BRACKET SOME OF THEM HAVE 1-5 WORDS OR 60+ TO EVEN
200 WORDS.
POST TIME:
THE LOWER ENGAGEMNT POSTS HAVE BEEN POSTED AT TIMES BETWEEN 1AM AND
8AM WHILE POST WHO GET BETTER ENGAGMNET ARE POSTED FROM 7AM TO 1PM.
POST TOPIC:
3
ARRESTS SEEM TO BE THE MOST POPULAR. WHEN IT COMES TO POST TOPICS, POSTS
TEND TO DO BETTER IF THE CAPTION CONTAINS A COMBINATION OF TOPICS. FOR
EXAMPLE, A CAR CRASH WITH A WANTED PERSON WHERE THE POLICE ASKS FOR HELP
FROM THE COMMUNITY BY REQUESTING INFOMRATION. RATHER THEN JUST MAKING A
STATEMENT ABOUT THE CASE THEY AK THE COMMUNITY TO GET INVOLVED BY
HELPING.
THE LOWEST ENGAGAMNET ONES ARE PATROLS, BURGLURIES, ADVICE POSTS, MODERN
SLAVERY, RECRUITMENT, FRAUD, NO TOPICS.
THESE ARE USUUALLY THE POSTS WHERE THERE IS JUST A LINK, STATUS OR A PICTURE
WITHOUT CAPTION.
THE CONTENT MIGHT BE GOOD BUT PEOPLE WILL NOT CLICK ON IT BECAUSE IT DOESNT
HAVE AN INTERESTING ENOUGH CAPTION TO SPIKE THEIR INTEREST SO THEY WILL JUST
KEEP ON SCROLLING. ON THE OTHER SIDE, PEOPLE WILL NOT ACCESS IT BECAUSE THE
CAPTION IS TOO LONG AND SEEMS OFFPUTTING
ADUR&WORHTING
WORDS:
TOP 10 SHARED POSTS: 28- 153 WORDS
TOP 10 LIKED POSTS: 15 – 128
TOP 10 COMMENTS: 35-169
REACH: -28-256
EVEN THOUGH SOME OF THE POSTS WITH A HIGHT NUMBER OF WORDS HAVE DONE
WELL THESE ARE ONLY ANOMALIES. MOST OF THE GOOD PERFORMING POSTS STILL
BEING IN THE 40 TO 60 WORDS.
POST TIME:
LOWEST ONES: 1-4 AM
4
HIGHEST ONES: 6AM -1PM
POST TOPIC:
THE TOPICS GETTING THE MOST ENGAGEMENT SATY THE SAME. MOSTLY
ARRESTS/ASSULT OR MURDER.
THE SAME CAN BE SAID ABOUT THE LOWEST ONES. THEY ARE THE LINKS, STATUSES,
SHARED VIDEOS, POSTS WITH NO TOPIC, PATROLS AND SAFETY.
THE SAME CAN BE SAID HERE. MOST OF THE LOWEST ONES HAVE NO TOPIC OR NO
CAPTION. THE BIGGEST ISSUE SEEMS TO BE THE PICTURES POSTED WITHOUT A CAPTION
THESE CONSTITUTING 8 OUT OF THE 10 LEAST LIKED POSTS ON THE PAGE.
SXP APPROACH
Gather all the data that we have, it seems like that most of the post are posted in
after midnight before the morning, and as the data shown that most of the police
followers active at midday, therefore unless it’s an urgent post then its best to post at
midday. As study suggest that on average there are 1500 stories that could appear
in a person’s news feed each time they log onto Facebook. For people with lots of
friends and page likes, as many as 15,000 potential stories could appear any time
they log on (Read, 2020). Therefore, timing is the key factors that determines when
content appears. However, the downside is that most brand would try to post at this
time therefore creates competition.
- Read, A., 2020. Best Time To Post On Facebook: A Complete Guide -. [online] Buffer Marketing
Library. Available at: <https://buffer.com/library/best-time-to-post-on-
facebook#:~:text=According%20to%20a%20Buffer%20study,higher%20on%20Thursdays%20and
%20Fridays.> [Accessed 10 March 2020].
5
Found that most replies that police reply to are good reply, maybe looking into reply
to those who have not so good comment, but compare to other forces, such as
GPM, Sussex Police is doing good on replies.
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Monitoring social media and media conversations: basic form of engagement which
uses social media to understand what the public wants. Use social media monitoring
tools to find out what the community sees as being a priority when it comes to the
police force in their area. This will help ensure that the message meets the needs of
the community. Being able to offer relevant replies shows that the SSP are paying
attention to their community and put effort into replying accordingly.
Influencer engagement: through social media monitoring public safety influencers
can be found. They can speak on different topics and raise awareness which will in
turn raise engagement.
Creating opportunities for the public to engage with the organization and for the
users to engage with each other could turn out to be beneficial. The organization
should find ways to connect with the user and support interaction between the users.
This might in the end create a sense of community which will increase engagement.
For example: a lot of health organization have created scheduled events on
Facebook/twitter. These consist in a live chat where users can engage with each
other and the organization.
Incorporate online and offline engagement: this allows engagement in both the real
world and online. This offers committed social media users the opportunity to gain
6
access to exclusive event and opportunities. These could include meet and greet
sessions, panels or training sessions. For example, the Red Cross has been offering
training sessions to individuals on how to use social media on behalf of the Red
Cross in times of need. Volunteers report issues in different area.
Post should contain 1-80 characters as study suggest that posts with 80 character or
less receive 66% higher engagement (Shelyner, 2020). As Facebook cuts off longer
posts with an ellipsis, forcing users to click “See More” to expand the text and read
the entire message. This extra step does not seem like much, but it will drive down
engagement. Every time you ask the audience to take action, a percentage of people
will lose interest.
Shelyner,E.,2020.TheIdeal Social Media PostLength:A GuideForEvery Platform.[online] HootsuiteSocial
Media Management.Availableat:<https://blog.hootsuite.com/ideal-social-media-post-length/#Facebook>
[Accessed 11 March 2020].
7
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03391698.pdf
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03391698
DRIVING PENETRATION
VIRALITY BEYOND SOCIAL
To understand what drives penetration and what makes a post go viral, we use a
combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. For the purpose of this report
viral reach is defined as the total number of unique users who see any specific
content of the page because one or more of their friends engage with the content
before; so the number of people who have seen a page post in a report of a friend.
With a good understanding of the surrounding literature on police force social media
use and deeper analysis of the data available the following points summarise the key
findings on “What drives penetration”:
Audience engagement with police social media content is driven by
- the characteristics of the content itself (Wood, 2020; van de Velde, Meijer, &
Homburg, 2015). An example of a bold but successful social media strategy is
New South Wales Police Force in Australia. As they describe their “meme
strategy” helped them reach one million followers in August 2017. Sussex
Police Facebook engagement is evidently higher in all twelve districts where
posts have comical tone or content is made “fun”, even if the subject is not a
‘laughing matter’. See examples of the top 10 performing posts
8
9
Type of content that consistently underperformed:
- Advising the public
- Raising awareness of an issue (e.g. modern slavery)
- Shared posts from outside organisation and other Facebook pages, examples
include corporate to district.
10
- The writing style of the content (Lieberman et al., 2013).
11
- Time the content is posted (Fernandez, Cano, & Alani, 2014); The insights
from top 10 and Bottom 10 ‘lifetime total post reach by unique users’ from 12
districts’ Facebook account as follows:
o 57% of posts with the lowest reach ratio were posted between
1am – 4.30am.
o 22.5% of posts with highest reach ratio were posted between 1am
– 4.30am.
The majority of posts with highest reach ratio were posted between 7am –
11am.
Please note the limitations of this analysis, due to limited time and
capacity, socio-demographic factors were not taken into consideration.
For example, Brighton and Hove has younger population compared to
other districts. Their lifestyles may differ in many aspects, including
active social media hours.
- Timing of the posts have no significant effect on the number of likes, shares
and comments received relative to the post engagement
CATEGORIZING SUCCESS
All the titles we used the categorise the data are included in the excel sheet attached
at the end of the document.
The highest success rate in terms of reach have been the posts which request
information. This implies a boost in engagement when the community feels like they
can engage/help through offering information.
12
Next ones are anything to do with arrests/sentences or end of case posts. This gets
a lot of engagement because the community feels like justice has been done.
The following are theft/robbery/burglaries, safety and missing person posts. This
further present the idea of the community wanting to help and engage on a personal
level.
These types of posts seem to usually be short and concise but there are exceptions.
The time of delivery differs but it is usually between 1 AM to 5 AM.
VALIDITY OF HASHTAGS
A study has suggested that the more hashtags you use in the post, the less
engagement rate it has. In order to receive higher engagement when using fewer
hashtags in a post, with somewhere between one and three being the optimum
amount. Judging by SXP usage of hashtags, you generally do good and kept the
hashtags minimum, however, some of the post contains more than 10 hashtags and
therefore, in the future try to cut the hashtags down on those.
13
BENCHMARKING
ATTAINMENT BENCHMARKS – THE PLATFORM
To benchmark the engagement levels for Sussex police, eight police Facebook
pages were with similar population to two districts were analysed.
The two Facebook pages from Sussex Police which were looked at were the ones
with the largest population, Brighton & Hove with 290,3895 people and the lowest,
Hastings with 92,236 people.
The aim was to see how well posts made by Sussex Police’s Facebook pages
engaged in comparison to posts made by law enforcement agencies throughout
England.
The table below shows the average number of likes, comments and shares per post
for the month of December.
Appendix shows the number of likes, comments and shares per post.
METHODOLOGY
1. The law enforcement agency’s Facebook pages were chosen based on the
population size which was closest to Brighton & Hove and Hastings. This was
done by searching list of districts by population.
2. One month was chosen. This was December because it was the last month
that was analysed in the one year period for Sussex Police.
3. The number of likes, comment and shares were manually counted per police
Facebook page
4. Sad, angry , laughing faces and hearts were all counted as likes.
5. Engagement percentage was calculated by adding average likes, comment
and shares and diving this by the number of posts and then calculating this as
a percentage of the followers.
14
LIMITATIONS
- Post reach could not be used to determine post engagement because we do
not have access to same post data on other police Facebook pages.
Therefore, we have to assume that the people who interact with the posts are
followers.
- Not all followers of that police page will see every post that is made.
- Not everyone that engages with a post, follows the police Facebook page.
Average likes, comments and shares for December 2019
District Populatio
n
Number
of
follower
s
% of
populatio
n
following
FB page
Numb
er of
posts
Averag
e likes
Average
comme
nts
Averag
e
shares
Engagemen
t %
Stockport
Greater
Manchester
291,775 19,314 6.62 28 127 20 71 0.040
Brighton &
Hove
Sussex
290,395 9,397 3.24 60 47 9 20 0.013
Greenwich
Greater
London
286,186 3,160 1.10 3 130 25 38 0.456
Walsall
West
Midlands
283,378 23,169 8.17 4 51 33 41 0.135
South Holland
Lincolnshire
93,980 2,982 3.17 33 19 7 10 0.036
Three Rivers
Hertfordshire
93,045 3,079 3.31 21 26 7 6 0.060
Hastings
Sussex
92,236 12, 400 13.44 65 26 6 18 0.006
CastlePoint
Essex
90,070 11,490 12.76 34 96 20 16 0.033
15
KEY FINDINGS
- In comparison to the population size which is at the smaller end of scale of the
districts analysed, with around 92,000 people. Hastings performed the best in
having the largest number of people following their Facebook page with
13.44% of the population following them.
- Brighton & Hove have one of the lowest percentages of population following
the Facebook page with only 3.24%. This is considerably lower than other
police districts of similar size to Brighton & Hove despite posting the most
Facebook posts per month out of the four other districts.
- Hastings also have a lower 25-44 aged population using social media with
21,293 people compared to the 86,621 people in Brighton & Hove.
- As seen in Facebook insights, the age group which engage with posts the
most are aged between 25-34. This is consistent with both districts with 19%
of women and 10% of men in Hastings and 19% of women and 11% of men in
Brighton & Hove.
- In terms of frequency of posts both districts in Sussex have performed the
best with over 60 posts in the month of December. This is vital for the
distribution of information and a key aspect in engaging communities.
- Brighton & Hove and Hastings both scored the lowest in terms of
engagement. A reason why their posts don’t get as much engagement is
because there are more repeated posts than any other police page. These
have very low engagement as they don’t get as much interaction from
followers.
16
RECOMMENDATIONS
- Limit repeated posts of topics about anti-social driving, modern day slavery
and fraud prevention to one post per month. These posts seem to have to
lowest engagement.
- Improve engagement in the age categories 18-24 and 55-64 by targeting
posts which are relevant to these ages.
- Increase the number of people following the Brighton & Hove Facebook page
in the 15-24 age categories by targeting schools and universities so that the
page is more known. This will help to improve engagement because the
percentage of people using mobile social media is the highest than any other
age group, at 98%.
EXPECTATIONS FOR REACH AND IMPRESSION
Average engagement per post (shares, likes and comments) for 11 districts
District Average highest (shares, likes &
comments)
Average lowest (shares, likes &
comments)
Chichester 798.6 3
Crawley 220.7 2.5
Horsham 163.4 2.9
Eastbourne 155 2
Lewes 124.4 1.4
Mid Sussex 256.8 0
Brighton & Hove 398.1 0.8
Adur & Worthing 268 2.9
Arun 312.6 1
Rother 203.4 0
Hastings 343 1
Wealden 193.5 0
17
KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- The highest reach is for a Facebook post by Sussex police is 178,922.
The posts which have the highest reach are ones which include missing
people.
The average reach that a ‘good’ post would gain is around 50,000.
- The lowest reach that a post would gain is around 188. This was found to be
for posts like modern day slavery where they have been posted multiple
times. Psychological structure called ‘Adaption’ states that once the same
posts appears on peoples social media timelines, they become desensitised
to the post therefore less likely to engage in the post.
- The average engagement (comment, shares and likes) are shown for the 11
districts.
The highest average engagement is 798.6 which is for Chichester. This is
still a small fraction as their posts can reach a high of 268,962 people.
- Chichester, Hastings and Brighton & Hove’s Facebook pages have the most
followers. This is reflected on the engagement that they receive.
- To improve engagement for Horsham and Lewes Facebook pages, they need
to increase the number of followers they have.
18
LINKS VS NO LINKS, PHOTOS VS VIDEO
The aim was to find out whether there is a positive correlation between posting
photos or videos to have the most engagement. And to see if including links
improves engagement in a post.
METHODOLOGY
1. The top ten posts were looked at for each district in Sussex. The posts types
were then counted and categorised between photos and videos.
2. The links were then counted and noted of whether they were photos, videos
or statuses.
3. This was then repeated for the bottom ten posts
LIMITATIONS
All post types should be looked at and categorised between photos, videos and
status to get a more accurate picture of correlation between photos, videos and
engagement.
19
DISTRICT’S TOP 10 POSTS WITH THE HIGHEST REACH
District Photos Videos Links
Chichester 9 1 4 photos
1 video
Crawley 10 6 photos
Horsham 10 7 photos
Eastbourne 9 7 photos
Lewes 10 6 photos
Mid Sussex 9 1 8 photos
Brighton & Hove 8 2 6 photos
2 videos
Adur & Worthing 8 1 7 photos
1 video
Arun 10 4 photos
Rother 10 3 photos
Hastings 9 6 photos
Wealden 9 1 3 photos
DISTRICT’S BOTTOM 10 POSTS WITH LOWEST REACH
District Photos Video Links
Chichester 3 3 1 link
Crawley 5 4 2 photos
1 video
Horsham 3 7 2 photos
3 videos
Eastbourne 8 2 3 photos
Lewes 7 2 3 photos
Mid Sussex 8 1 4 photos
Brighton & Hove 5 2 2 videos
5 photos
Adur & Worthing 7 1 link
2 photos
Arun 3 3 2 links
Rother 4 1 link
Hastings 6 2 photos
Wealden 6 2 1 link
1 photo
2 videos
20
KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Districts top posts all show that the highest reach include posts which include
photos.
- There is a preference for photos vs videos in the highest reaching posts.
- In the districts lowest reaching posts there are more videos vs photos.
- There is also more reach on posts which include links as the top 10 highest
reaching posts all have more links compared to the bottom 10 lowest reaching
posts.
- Sussex police should include links in their posts to improve reach.
21
DEMOGRAPHIC INSIGHTS
Followers Total population Facebook users % Ratio
Eastbourne 6766 103054 81413 8%
Hastings 12465 92236 72866 17%
Lewes 5399 101381 80091 7%
Rother 6362 93551 73905 9%
Wealden 4766 157575 124484 4%
Brighton &
Hove
9275 289229 228491 4%
Adur &
Worthing
7824 112419 88811 9%
Arun 13685 156997 124028 11%
Chichester 12669 118175 93358 14%
Crawley 10081 111375 87986 11%
Horsham 6820 138018 109034 6%
Mid Sussex 5884 147089 116200 5%
8%
17%
7%
9%
4% 4%
9%
11%
14%
11%
6%
5%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
Eastbourne
Hastings
Lew
es
Rother
W
ealden
Brighton
&
Hove
Adur&
W
orthing
Arun
Chichester
Craw
ley
Horsham
M
id
Sussex
Ratio of followers relative to local population accessing Facebook (Meltwater data)
22
SURVEY RESULT
We have conducted a survey and trying to find out what the public wants. However,
the survey only has 35 responses, so it does not represent the vast majority
therefore is only an insight.
The survey was mostly responded by demographic of 18-34 with majority of people
do not follow local/Sussex police Facebook page, and even when people follow the
page, it appears that they don’t actively engage with the page.
And for those who may considering follow the page, they would like to see more
police dogs, positive updates as well as comedic posts. This can be seen with the
most engaged post by the Corporate on the 20th of December.
The survey has also suggested that better captions.
23
REFERENCES
Essex- castle point Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/EPCastlePoint/
Fernandez, M., Cano, A. E., & Alani, H. (2014). Policing engagement via social media. In Aiello, L. M.,
& McFarland, D. Social Informatics 2014: Revised Selected Papers. London: Springer. 18-26.
Greater London, Greenwich Facebook page-
https://www.facebook.com/MPSGreenwich/?__tn__=%2Cd%2CP-
R&eid=ARAIxhnYjq7zHWWfMl9RnRCKrKh1_LAbPnaOOBnxoTd0pPTgDxtMesaVLe5C_ZY_y6Z2lYk
mZ7WHltcZ
Greater Manchester, Stockport Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/GMPStockport/
Hertfordshire, Three rivers Facebook page-
https://www.facebook.com/ThreeRiversPolice/?__tn__=%2Cd%2CP -
R&eid=ARAmkLKSt1ApgD2skjF1CvcV7OF60W5h8UjIWWVSRHNnDH_DDYo-
MNnPXlItnJ3xlow3PStYoIu7NQsU
Lieberman, J. D., Koetzle, D., & Sakiyama, M. (2013). Police Departments Use of Facebook: Patterns
and Policy Issues. Policy Quarterly, 16 (4), 438-462.
Lincolnshire, South Holland Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/SouthHollandPolice/?ref=search&__tn__=%2Cd%2CP-
R&eid=ARDSSV4cmEjyQhuVkvs7eYfFlqCRFgqwxFvaZunF5p1tf3hAOz-
V59_SxrEUxtXAdcyMFT_N2xBpaT_g
List of districts by population - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_districts_by_population
Sussex, Brighton and Hove Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/BrightonHovePolice/
Sussex, Hastings Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/hastingspoliceuk/
Van de Velde, B., Meijer, A., & Homburg, V. (2015). Police message diffusion on Twitter: Analysing
the reach of social media communications. Behaviour & Information Technology,34(1), 4–16.
West midlands, Walsall Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/walsallpolice/
Wood, M. A. (2020). Policing’s ‘meme strategy’: understanding the rise of police social media
engagement work. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 32(1), 40–58.
24
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1
Graphs for the reach ratios for each district separately, presented as percentage.
Showing the Top and Bottom 10 posts.
25
26
27
28
29
30
APPENDIX 2
District Population Number
of
followers
Number
of posts
Average likes Average
comments
Average
shares
Stockport
Greater
Manchester
291,775 19,314 28 79, 159,109, 26, 87,
149, 368,144, 260,
54, 44, 129,159, 26,
134, 35,45, 419, 402,
24, 65, 280,155, 56,
78, 36, 22, 21
=3565
127
1,8, 32, 7,
6, 24, 51,
53, 49, 3,
11, 22, 7,
18, 24, 2,
14, 48, 31,
4, 6, 49, 69,
14
=553
20
4, 9, 4, 4, 2,
18, 19, 128,
50, 1, 9, 10, 2,
19, 2, 1, 20,
1600,8,9, 49,
7, 2, 2, 1, 2, 10
=1992
71
Brighton &
Hove
Sussex
290,395 9,397 60 38, 18,34, 36, 39, 45,
42, 49, 19, 91,22, 55,
22, 226,60, 127, 77,
13,49, 39, 9, 8, 90, 89,
18, 63, 36, 37,132,
1,22,9, 18, 60, 49, 26,
29, 122,45, 33, 25,
11, 31, 16, 24,7, 4,
61, 22, 14, 148,32,
77, 6, 158, 35,15, 41,
56, 37
=2817
47
1, 2, 3,
17,3, 4,2,
12, 15, 21,
2, 10, 1, 30,
22, 51, 23,
8, 14, 4, 3,
3, 5, 23, 2,
10, 1, 1, 7,
2, 3, 1,4,
30, 1, 4, 6,
10, 4, 3, 9,
2, 12, 3, 39,
3, 43, 1, 23,
39,4
=546
9
6, 2, 3, 18, 2,
3, 5, 5,6, 53, 7,
2,4, 6, 17, 183,
164, 4, 50, 1,
15, 3, 7, 2, 14,
21, 2, 3, 5, 1,
14, 7, 1, 2, 2,
3, 1, 17, 46,7,
14, 31, 3, 26,
19, 16, 5, 183,
23, 23, 74, 54
=1185
20
Greenwich
Greater
London
286,186 3,160 3 306, 27,58
=391
130
63, 2, 10
=75
25
94, 20
=114
38
Walsall
West
Midlands
283,378 23,169 4 41, 46, 14, 102
=203
51
45, 11, 3,
72
=131
33
19, 9, 75, 60
=163
41
South Holland
Lincolnshire
93,980 2,982 33 60, 2, 1, 6, 3, 15, 25,
86, 42, 34, 10,6, 51,
2, 24, 29, 14, 26, 15,
12, 49, 17, 13,10, 10,
46, 1, 4, 1, 8, 4
=626
19
8, 2, 1, 1, 1,
1, 15, 33,
14, 12, 2, 6,
35, 25, 2,
17, 5, 34, 5,
17, 2, 1
=239
7
6, 2, 2, 4, 1, 2,
37, 7,7, 18, 1,
9, 1, 7, 65, 35,
4, 11, 3, 1, 10,
3, 11, 22, 20,
35, 3, 2
=339
10
Three Rivers
Hertfordshire
93,045 3,079 21 70, 16, 50, 1, 53, 28,
12, 18, 21, 4, 49, 51,
9, 21, 3, 6, 4, 5, 62,
12, 51
=546
8, 13, 8, 14,
3, 22, 1, 5,
41, 2, 5, 2,
10, 4
=138
5, 41, 10, 7, 1,
2, 3, 7, 9, 1,
18, 11, 4, 7, 4,
1
=131
31
26
7 6
Hastings
Sussex
92,236 12, 400 65 217, 1, 77, 90,5, 3,
38, 14, 2, 18, 10, 15,
23, 5, 101, 7, 288 75,
3, 4, 5, 4, 2, 7, 68,5,8,
17, 9, 6, 85, 39, 43, 1,
5, 3, 9, 8, 3, 5, 4, 7,8,
2, 5, 58, 6,6, 3, 5, 67,
7, 19, 17, 13, 8, 67, 2,
4, 33, 4, 1, 32, 13, 2
=1721
26
46, 9, 34,
10, 5, 3, 15,
3, 8, 13, 36,
64, 2, 1, 7,
24, 6, 6, 13,
6, 1, 1, 1, 1,
2, 13, 15,
11, 3, 14, 3,
2, 2, 10, 8,
10, 3
=411
6
43, 14, 8, 2,
86, 15, 39, 18,
4, 6, 4, 2, 4,
80, 517,1, 5,
7, 1, 2, 3, 48,
6, 3, 16, 2, 23,
4, 1, 17, 4, 2,
8, 11, 2, 4, 4,
6, 8, 3, 16, 2,
2, 8, 2, 5, 30,
3, 1, 22, 4, 2,
16, 20, 3, 14,
3, 6
=1192
18
CastlePoint
Essex
90,070 11,490 34 15, 121,177, 33, 158,
234, 21,75, 150, 130,
122, 100,180, 59, 63,
170, 27,11, 45, 295,
78, 143,101, 18, 80,
154, 26,98, 50, 47,
69, 74, 74, 55
=3253
96
4, 20, 30,
35, 24, 28,
6, 1, 13, 35,
28, 7, 35,
14,3, 21,
51, 1, 3,
100, 5, 28,
9, 11, 34, 3,
11, 3, 12,
13, 9, 12
=692
20
2, 11, 16, 80,
12, 13, 23, 4,
33, 7, 7, 2, 14,
4, 10, 25, 3, 1,
47, 2, 19, 10,
15, 5, 52, 19,
8, 9, 16, 17, 9,
4
=532
16

More Related Content

What's hot

Social Media Report_SuperValu
Social Media Report_SuperValuSocial Media Report_SuperValu
Social Media Report_SuperValu
Paul O'Sullivan
 
Katz_Jonathan-IS (3)
Katz_Jonathan-IS (3)Katz_Jonathan-IS (3)
Katz_Jonathan-IS (3)
Jonathan Katz
 
Facebook brings more harm than good
Facebook brings more harm than goodFacebook brings more harm than good
Facebook brings more harm than good
Grace Ray
 
A Coming South Africa 2.0
A Coming South Africa 2.0A Coming South Africa 2.0
A Coming South Africa 2.0
Eshaam Rabaney
 
NARI Social Media Presentation
NARI Social Media PresentationNARI Social Media Presentation
NARI Social Media Presentation
Barbara Burgie
 
SCORE social media_workshop(08202011)v2
SCORE social media_workshop(08202011)v2SCORE social media_workshop(08202011)v2
SCORE social media_workshop(08202011)v2
Ralph J. Davila, APR
 
20 Tactics to Increase and Engage Web Traffic
20 Tactics to Increase and Engage Web Traffic20 Tactics to Increase and Engage Web Traffic
20 Tactics to Increase and Engage Web Traffic
Blackbaud
 

What's hot (18)

NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
 
Nfp workshop
Nfp workshop Nfp workshop
Nfp workshop
 
Social 101 Facebook
Social 101 FacebookSocial 101 Facebook
Social 101 Facebook
 
Social Media Report_SuperValu
Social Media Report_SuperValuSocial Media Report_SuperValu
Social Media Report_SuperValu
 
Katz_Jonathan-IS (3)
Katz_Jonathan-IS (3)Katz_Jonathan-IS (3)
Katz_Jonathan-IS (3)
 
The New Media World
The New Media WorldThe New Media World
The New Media World
 
Facebook brings more harm than good
Facebook brings more harm than goodFacebook brings more harm than good
Facebook brings more harm than good
 
Platform failure! YouTube, Facebook & Co. go rogue
Platform failure! YouTube, Facebook & Co. go roguePlatform failure! YouTube, Facebook & Co. go rogue
Platform failure! YouTube, Facebook & Co. go rogue
 
Navigating the Facebook Algorithm Change: 2018 Report
Navigating the Facebook Algorithm Change: 2018 ReportNavigating the Facebook Algorithm Change: 2018 Report
Navigating the Facebook Algorithm Change: 2018 Report
 
A Coming South Africa 2.0
A Coming South Africa 2.0A Coming South Africa 2.0
A Coming South Africa 2.0
 
NARI Social Media Presentation
NARI Social Media PresentationNARI Social Media Presentation
NARI Social Media Presentation
 
Presentation on platforms
Presentation on platformsPresentation on platforms
Presentation on platforms
 
Social Media for Business
Social Media for BusinessSocial Media for Business
Social Media for Business
 
Rd Table Presentation Power Of Sns
Rd Table Presentation Power Of SnsRd Table Presentation Power Of Sns
Rd Table Presentation Power Of Sns
 
SCORE social media_workshop(08202011)v2
SCORE social media_workshop(08202011)v2SCORE social media_workshop(08202011)v2
SCORE social media_workshop(08202011)v2
 
20 Tactics to Increase and Engage Web Traffic
20 Tactics to Increase and Engage Web Traffic20 Tactics to Increase and Engage Web Traffic
20 Tactics to Increase and Engage Web Traffic
 
Get Linkedin
Get LinkedinGet Linkedin
Get Linkedin
 
WindyCityTimes
WindyCityTimesWindyCityTimes
WindyCityTimes
 

Similar to Final report (1)

NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
Joshua Portin
 
Social media cipd pres
Social media cipd presSocial media cipd pres
Social media cipd pres
MIKEP67
 
Take The Lead Social Media Guide
Take The Lead Social Media GuideTake The Lead Social Media Guide
Take The Lead Social Media Guide
Erica Holt
 
UAL-LCC-MA Public Relations-Dissertation-Final
UAL-LCC-MA Public Relations-Dissertation-FinalUAL-LCC-MA Public Relations-Dissertation-Final
UAL-LCC-MA Public Relations-Dissertation-Final
Emma Tushinski
 

Similar to Final report (1) (20)

Social Media In Prevention
Social Media In PreventionSocial Media In Prevention
Social Media In Prevention
 
Social media mktg practice v8
Social media mktg practice v8Social media mktg practice v8
Social media mktg practice v8
 
NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
NOPJF Social Media Reccomendations (Paper)
 
HR Club Newcastle Presentation on Social Media
HR Club Newcastle Presentation on Social MediaHR Club Newcastle Presentation on Social Media
HR Club Newcastle Presentation on Social Media
 
Social Media Influence Analysis
Social Media Influence AnalysisSocial Media Influence Analysis
Social Media Influence Analysis
 
social media seminar -Gautam dithuluru
social media seminar -Gautam dithulurusocial media seminar -Gautam dithuluru
social media seminar -Gautam dithuluru
 
Social Media in Market Research
Social Media in Market ResearchSocial Media in Market Research
Social Media in Market Research
 
FB case.pdf
FB case.pdfFB case.pdf
FB case.pdf
 
G social
G socialG social
G social
 
Social media cipd pres
Social media cipd presSocial media cipd pres
Social media cipd pres
 
Social Media 101: Things Have Changed Since School Let Out - John Blue
Social Media 101: Things Have Changed Since School Let Out - John BlueSocial Media 101: Things Have Changed Since School Let Out - John Blue
Social Media 101: Things Have Changed Since School Let Out - John Blue
 
WISE Presentation
WISE PresentationWISE Presentation
WISE Presentation
 
Sm comms slides tech try
Sm comms slides tech trySm comms slides tech try
Sm comms slides tech try
 
English Formal Report
English Formal ReportEnglish Formal Report
English Formal Report
 
Social Media Audit Memo
Social Media Audit MemoSocial Media Audit Memo
Social Media Audit Memo
 
AIM: Successful social media
AIM: Successful social mediaAIM: Successful social media
AIM: Successful social media
 
Marketing Presentation (BTS)
Marketing Presentation (BTS)Marketing Presentation (BTS)
Marketing Presentation (BTS)
 
Social Media Introduction
Social Media IntroductionSocial Media Introduction
Social Media Introduction
 
Take The Lead Social Media Guide
Take The Lead Social Media GuideTake The Lead Social Media Guide
Take The Lead Social Media Guide
 
UAL-LCC-MA Public Relations-Dissertation-Final
UAL-LCC-MA Public Relations-Dissertation-FinalUAL-LCC-MA Public Relations-Dissertation-Final
UAL-LCC-MA Public Relations-Dissertation-Final
 

Recently uploaded

如何办理(WashU毕业证书)圣路易斯华盛顿大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
如何办理(WashU毕业证书)圣路易斯华盛顿大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证如何办理(WashU毕业证书)圣路易斯华盛顿大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
如何办理(WashU毕业证书)圣路易斯华盛顿大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
acoha1
 
Abortion pills in Riyadh Saudi Arabia (+966572737505 buy cytotec
Abortion pills in Riyadh Saudi Arabia (+966572737505 buy cytotecAbortion pills in Riyadh Saudi Arabia (+966572737505 buy cytotec
Abortion pills in Riyadh Saudi Arabia (+966572737505 buy cytotec
Abortion pills in Riyadh +966572737505 get cytotec
 
1:1原版定制伦敦政治经济学院毕业证(LSE毕业证)成绩单学位证书留信学历认证
1:1原版定制伦敦政治经济学院毕业证(LSE毕业证)成绩单学位证书留信学历认证1:1原版定制伦敦政治经济学院毕业证(LSE毕业证)成绩单学位证书留信学历认证
1:1原版定制伦敦政治经济学院毕业证(LSE毕业证)成绩单学位证书留信学历认证
dq9vz1isj
 
Displacement, Velocity, Acceleration, and Second Derivatives
Displacement, Velocity, Acceleration, and Second DerivativesDisplacement, Velocity, Acceleration, and Second Derivatives
Displacement, Velocity, Acceleration, and Second Derivatives
23050636
 
原件一样伦敦国王学院毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
原件一样伦敦国王学院毕业证成绩单留信学历认证原件一样伦敦国王学院毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
原件一样伦敦国王学院毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
pwgnohujw
 
Audience Researchndfhcvnfgvgbhujhgfv.pptx
Audience Researchndfhcvnfgvgbhujhgfv.pptxAudience Researchndfhcvnfgvgbhujhgfv.pptx
Audience Researchndfhcvnfgvgbhujhgfv.pptx
Stephen266013
 
如何办理(Dalhousie毕业证书)达尔豪斯大学毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
如何办理(Dalhousie毕业证书)达尔豪斯大学毕业证成绩单留信学历认证如何办理(Dalhousie毕业证书)达尔豪斯大学毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
如何办理(Dalhousie毕业证书)达尔豪斯大学毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
zifhagzkk
 
如何办理(UPenn毕业证书)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
如何办理(UPenn毕业证书)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证如何办理(UPenn毕业证书)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
如何办理(UPenn毕业证书)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
acoha1
 
如何办理(UCLA毕业证书)加州大学洛杉矶分校毕业证成绩单学位证留信学历认证原件一样
如何办理(UCLA毕业证书)加州大学洛杉矶分校毕业证成绩单学位证留信学历认证原件一样如何办理(UCLA毕业证书)加州大学洛杉矶分校毕业证成绩单学位证留信学历认证原件一样
如何办理(UCLA毕业证书)加州大学洛杉矶分校毕业证成绩单学位证留信学历认证原件一样
jk0tkvfv
 

Recently uploaded (20)

如何办理(WashU毕业证书)圣路易斯华盛顿大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
如何办理(WashU毕业证书)圣路易斯华盛顿大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证如何办理(WashU毕业证书)圣路易斯华盛顿大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
如何办理(WashU毕业证书)圣路易斯华盛顿大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
 
Abortion pills in Riyadh Saudi Arabia (+966572737505 buy cytotec
Abortion pills in Riyadh Saudi Arabia (+966572737505 buy cytotecAbortion pills in Riyadh Saudi Arabia (+966572737505 buy cytotec
Abortion pills in Riyadh Saudi Arabia (+966572737505 buy cytotec
 
Data Analysis Project Presentation : NYC Shooting Cluster Analysis
Data Analysis Project Presentation : NYC Shooting Cluster AnalysisData Analysis Project Presentation : NYC Shooting Cluster Analysis
Data Analysis Project Presentation : NYC Shooting Cluster Analysis
 
1:1原版定制伦敦政治经济学院毕业证(LSE毕业证)成绩单学位证书留信学历认证
1:1原版定制伦敦政治经济学院毕业证(LSE毕业证)成绩单学位证书留信学历认证1:1原版定制伦敦政治经济学院毕业证(LSE毕业证)成绩单学位证书留信学历认证
1:1原版定制伦敦政治经济学院毕业证(LSE毕业证)成绩单学位证书留信学历认证
 
Aggregations - The Elasticsearch "GROUP BY"
Aggregations - The Elasticsearch "GROUP BY"Aggregations - The Elasticsearch "GROUP BY"
Aggregations - The Elasticsearch "GROUP BY"
 
Displacement, Velocity, Acceleration, and Second Derivatives
Displacement, Velocity, Acceleration, and Second DerivativesDisplacement, Velocity, Acceleration, and Second Derivatives
Displacement, Velocity, Acceleration, and Second Derivatives
 
How to Transform Clinical Trial Management with Advanced Data Analytics
How to Transform Clinical Trial Management with Advanced Data AnalyticsHow to Transform Clinical Trial Management with Advanced Data Analytics
How to Transform Clinical Trial Management with Advanced Data Analytics
 
原件一样伦敦国王学院毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
原件一样伦敦国王学院毕业证成绩单留信学历认证原件一样伦敦国王学院毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
原件一样伦敦国王学院毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
 
Audience Researchndfhcvnfgvgbhujhgfv.pptx
Audience Researchndfhcvnfgvgbhujhgfv.pptxAudience Researchndfhcvnfgvgbhujhgfv.pptx
Audience Researchndfhcvnfgvgbhujhgfv.pptx
 
Identify Rules that Predict Patient’s Heart Disease - An Application of Decis...
Identify Rules that Predict Patient’s Heart Disease - An Application of Decis...Identify Rules that Predict Patient’s Heart Disease - An Application of Decis...
Identify Rules that Predict Patient’s Heart Disease - An Application of Decis...
 
Northern New England Tableau User Group (TUG) May 2024
Northern New England Tableau User Group (TUG) May 2024Northern New England Tableau User Group (TUG) May 2024
Northern New England Tableau User Group (TUG) May 2024
 
如何办理(Dalhousie毕业证书)达尔豪斯大学毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
如何办理(Dalhousie毕业证书)达尔豪斯大学毕业证成绩单留信学历认证如何办理(Dalhousie毕业证书)达尔豪斯大学毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
如何办理(Dalhousie毕业证书)达尔豪斯大学毕业证成绩单留信学历认证
 
如何办理(UPenn毕业证书)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
如何办理(UPenn毕业证书)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证如何办理(UPenn毕业证书)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
如何办理(UPenn毕业证书)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单本科硕士学位证留信学历认证
 
Seven tools of quality control.slideshare
Seven tools of quality control.slideshareSeven tools of quality control.slideshare
Seven tools of quality control.slideshare
 
Identify Customer Segments to Create Customer Offers for Each Segment - Appli...
Identify Customer Segments to Create Customer Offers for Each Segment - Appli...Identify Customer Segments to Create Customer Offers for Each Segment - Appli...
Identify Customer Segments to Create Customer Offers for Each Segment - Appli...
 
SCI8-Q4-MOD11.pdfwrwujrrjfaajerjrajrrarj
SCI8-Q4-MOD11.pdfwrwujrrjfaajerjrajrrarjSCI8-Q4-MOD11.pdfwrwujrrjfaajerjrajrrarj
SCI8-Q4-MOD11.pdfwrwujrrjfaajerjrajrrarj
 
Credit Card Fraud Detection: Safeguarding Transactions in the Digital Age
Credit Card Fraud Detection: Safeguarding Transactions in the Digital AgeCredit Card Fraud Detection: Safeguarding Transactions in the Digital Age
Credit Card Fraud Detection: Safeguarding Transactions in the Digital Age
 
Statistics Informed Decisions Using Data 5th edition by Michael Sullivan solu...
Statistics Informed Decisions Using Data 5th edition by Michael Sullivan solu...Statistics Informed Decisions Using Data 5th edition by Michael Sullivan solu...
Statistics Informed Decisions Using Data 5th edition by Michael Sullivan solu...
 
如何办理(UCLA毕业证书)加州大学洛杉矶分校毕业证成绩单学位证留信学历认证原件一样
如何办理(UCLA毕业证书)加州大学洛杉矶分校毕业证成绩单学位证留信学历认证原件一样如何办理(UCLA毕业证书)加州大学洛杉矶分校毕业证成绩单学位证留信学历认证原件一样
如何办理(UCLA毕业证书)加州大学洛杉矶分校毕业证成绩单学位证留信学历认证原件一样
 
Genuine love spell caster )! ,+27834335081) Ex lover back permanently in At...
Genuine love spell caster )! ,+27834335081)   Ex lover back permanently in At...Genuine love spell caster )! ,+27834335081)   Ex lover back permanently in At...
Genuine love spell caster )! ,+27834335081) Ex lover back permanently in At...
 

Final report (1)

  • 1. SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS FOR THE SUSSEX POLICE: FACEBOOK 01.04.2020 Nihari Weerasinghe Kun Qin Bernadett Toth Teresa Cerny Amalia Ionete
  • 2. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Meaningful Patterns ....................................................................................................................2 Performance and Trends............................................................................................................ 2 SXP Approach............................................................................................................................ 4 Recommended Improvements....................................................................................................5 Driving Penetration......................................................................................................................7 Virality Beyond Social ................................................................................................................ 7 Categorizing Success................................................................................................................ 11 Validity of Hashtags................................................................................................................. 12 Benchmarking............................................................................................................................ 13 Attainment Benchmarks – The Platform.................................................................................... 13 Methodology....................................................................................................................... 13 Limitations.......................................................................................................................... 14 Keyfindings......................................................................................................................... 15 Recommendations............................................................................................................... 16 Expectations for reach and impression ....................................................................................... 16 Key findingsand recommendations .......................................................................................... 17 Links vs No Links, Photos vs Video.............................................................................................. 18 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 18 Limitations.............................................................................................................................. 18 District’s top 10 posts with the highest reach ........................................................................ 19 District’s bottom 10 posts with lowest reach......................................................................... 19 Key findingsand recommendations .......................................................................................... 20 Demographic Insights................................................................................................................. 21 Survey Result............................................................................................................................. 22 References................................................................................................................................. 23 Appendices................................................................................................................................ 24 Appendix 1.............................................................................................................................. 24 Appendix 2.............................................................................................................................. 30
  • 3. 2 MEANINGFUL PATTERNS PERFORMANCE AND TRENDS PLEASE CHANGE THE FONT AND WRITING TO MATCH THE REST OF THE TEXT Arun: WORDS: HOGHEST 10 SHARED: 35-61 WORDS HIGHEST 10 LIKED: 11- 94 WORDS HIGHEST 10 COMMENTS: 37 – 86 WORDS HIGHEST 10 REACH: 32 – 85 WORDS THESE ARE THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST NUMBER OF WORDS USED FOR CAPTION FOR THE POSTS WITH THE MOST ENGAGEMENT. THE ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT MOST SUCCESFULL ONES ARE BETWEEN 40 TO 60 WORDS WITH MOST OF THEM BENING AROUND 45-54 WORDS. WHEN IT COMES TO THE LOWER VALUES, WE LOOK AT EITHER TOO MANY OR TOO FEW WORDS. FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE LOOK AT THE TOP 10 LOWEST VALUES FOR THE CATEGORIES PRESENTED BEFORE WE CAN SEE THAT WHILE SOME OF THE POSTS ARE STILL IN THE 40-60 WORDS BRACKET SOME OF THEM HAVE 1-5 WORDS OR 60+ TO EVEN 200 WORDS. POST TIME: THE LOWER ENGAGEMNT POSTS HAVE BEEN POSTED AT TIMES BETWEEN 1AM AND 8AM WHILE POST WHO GET BETTER ENGAGMNET ARE POSTED FROM 7AM TO 1PM. POST TOPIC:
  • 4. 3 ARRESTS SEEM TO BE THE MOST POPULAR. WHEN IT COMES TO POST TOPICS, POSTS TEND TO DO BETTER IF THE CAPTION CONTAINS A COMBINATION OF TOPICS. FOR EXAMPLE, A CAR CRASH WITH A WANTED PERSON WHERE THE POLICE ASKS FOR HELP FROM THE COMMUNITY BY REQUESTING INFOMRATION. RATHER THEN JUST MAKING A STATEMENT ABOUT THE CASE THEY AK THE COMMUNITY TO GET INVOLVED BY HELPING. THE LOWEST ENGAGAMNET ONES ARE PATROLS, BURGLURIES, ADVICE POSTS, MODERN SLAVERY, RECRUITMENT, FRAUD, NO TOPICS. THESE ARE USUUALLY THE POSTS WHERE THERE IS JUST A LINK, STATUS OR A PICTURE WITHOUT CAPTION. THE CONTENT MIGHT BE GOOD BUT PEOPLE WILL NOT CLICK ON IT BECAUSE IT DOESNT HAVE AN INTERESTING ENOUGH CAPTION TO SPIKE THEIR INTEREST SO THEY WILL JUST KEEP ON SCROLLING. ON THE OTHER SIDE, PEOPLE WILL NOT ACCESS IT BECAUSE THE CAPTION IS TOO LONG AND SEEMS OFFPUTTING ADUR&WORHTING WORDS: TOP 10 SHARED POSTS: 28- 153 WORDS TOP 10 LIKED POSTS: 15 – 128 TOP 10 COMMENTS: 35-169 REACH: -28-256 EVEN THOUGH SOME OF THE POSTS WITH A HIGHT NUMBER OF WORDS HAVE DONE WELL THESE ARE ONLY ANOMALIES. MOST OF THE GOOD PERFORMING POSTS STILL BEING IN THE 40 TO 60 WORDS. POST TIME: LOWEST ONES: 1-4 AM
  • 5. 4 HIGHEST ONES: 6AM -1PM POST TOPIC: THE TOPICS GETTING THE MOST ENGAGEMENT SATY THE SAME. MOSTLY ARRESTS/ASSULT OR MURDER. THE SAME CAN BE SAID ABOUT THE LOWEST ONES. THEY ARE THE LINKS, STATUSES, SHARED VIDEOS, POSTS WITH NO TOPIC, PATROLS AND SAFETY. THE SAME CAN BE SAID HERE. MOST OF THE LOWEST ONES HAVE NO TOPIC OR NO CAPTION. THE BIGGEST ISSUE SEEMS TO BE THE PICTURES POSTED WITHOUT A CAPTION THESE CONSTITUTING 8 OUT OF THE 10 LEAST LIKED POSTS ON THE PAGE. SXP APPROACH Gather all the data that we have, it seems like that most of the post are posted in after midnight before the morning, and as the data shown that most of the police followers active at midday, therefore unless it’s an urgent post then its best to post at midday. As study suggest that on average there are 1500 stories that could appear in a person’s news feed each time they log onto Facebook. For people with lots of friends and page likes, as many as 15,000 potential stories could appear any time they log on (Read, 2020). Therefore, timing is the key factors that determines when content appears. However, the downside is that most brand would try to post at this time therefore creates competition. - Read, A., 2020. Best Time To Post On Facebook: A Complete Guide -. [online] Buffer Marketing Library. Available at: <https://buffer.com/library/best-time-to-post-on- facebook#:~:text=According%20to%20a%20Buffer%20study,higher%20on%20Thursdays%20and %20Fridays.> [Accessed 10 March 2020].
  • 6. 5 Found that most replies that police reply to are good reply, maybe looking into reply to those who have not so good comment, but compare to other forces, such as GPM, Sussex Police is doing good on replies. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Monitoring social media and media conversations: basic form of engagement which uses social media to understand what the public wants. Use social media monitoring tools to find out what the community sees as being a priority when it comes to the police force in their area. This will help ensure that the message meets the needs of the community. Being able to offer relevant replies shows that the SSP are paying attention to their community and put effort into replying accordingly. Influencer engagement: through social media monitoring public safety influencers can be found. They can speak on different topics and raise awareness which will in turn raise engagement. Creating opportunities for the public to engage with the organization and for the users to engage with each other could turn out to be beneficial. The organization should find ways to connect with the user and support interaction between the users. This might in the end create a sense of community which will increase engagement. For example: a lot of health organization have created scheduled events on Facebook/twitter. These consist in a live chat where users can engage with each other and the organization. Incorporate online and offline engagement: this allows engagement in both the real world and online. This offers committed social media users the opportunity to gain
  • 7. 6 access to exclusive event and opportunities. These could include meet and greet sessions, panels or training sessions. For example, the Red Cross has been offering training sessions to individuals on how to use social media on behalf of the Red Cross in times of need. Volunteers report issues in different area. Post should contain 1-80 characters as study suggest that posts with 80 character or less receive 66% higher engagement (Shelyner, 2020). As Facebook cuts off longer posts with an ellipsis, forcing users to click “See More” to expand the text and read the entire message. This extra step does not seem like much, but it will drive down engagement. Every time you ask the audience to take action, a percentage of people will lose interest. Shelyner,E.,2020.TheIdeal Social Media PostLength:A GuideForEvery Platform.[online] HootsuiteSocial Media Management.Availableat:<https://blog.hootsuite.com/ideal-social-media-post-length/#Facebook> [Accessed 11 March 2020].
  • 8. 7 https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03391698.pdf https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03391698 DRIVING PENETRATION VIRALITY BEYOND SOCIAL To understand what drives penetration and what makes a post go viral, we use a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. For the purpose of this report viral reach is defined as the total number of unique users who see any specific content of the page because one or more of their friends engage with the content before; so the number of people who have seen a page post in a report of a friend. With a good understanding of the surrounding literature on police force social media use and deeper analysis of the data available the following points summarise the key findings on “What drives penetration”: Audience engagement with police social media content is driven by - the characteristics of the content itself (Wood, 2020; van de Velde, Meijer, & Homburg, 2015). An example of a bold but successful social media strategy is New South Wales Police Force in Australia. As they describe their “meme strategy” helped them reach one million followers in August 2017. Sussex Police Facebook engagement is evidently higher in all twelve districts where posts have comical tone or content is made “fun”, even if the subject is not a ‘laughing matter’. See examples of the top 10 performing posts
  • 9. 8
  • 10. 9 Type of content that consistently underperformed: - Advising the public - Raising awareness of an issue (e.g. modern slavery) - Shared posts from outside organisation and other Facebook pages, examples include corporate to district.
  • 11. 10 - The writing style of the content (Lieberman et al., 2013).
  • 12. 11 - Time the content is posted (Fernandez, Cano, & Alani, 2014); The insights from top 10 and Bottom 10 ‘lifetime total post reach by unique users’ from 12 districts’ Facebook account as follows: o 57% of posts with the lowest reach ratio were posted between 1am – 4.30am. o 22.5% of posts with highest reach ratio were posted between 1am – 4.30am. The majority of posts with highest reach ratio were posted between 7am – 11am. Please note the limitations of this analysis, due to limited time and capacity, socio-demographic factors were not taken into consideration. For example, Brighton and Hove has younger population compared to other districts. Their lifestyles may differ in many aspects, including active social media hours. - Timing of the posts have no significant effect on the number of likes, shares and comments received relative to the post engagement CATEGORIZING SUCCESS All the titles we used the categorise the data are included in the excel sheet attached at the end of the document. The highest success rate in terms of reach have been the posts which request information. This implies a boost in engagement when the community feels like they can engage/help through offering information.
  • 13. 12 Next ones are anything to do with arrests/sentences or end of case posts. This gets a lot of engagement because the community feels like justice has been done. The following are theft/robbery/burglaries, safety and missing person posts. This further present the idea of the community wanting to help and engage on a personal level. These types of posts seem to usually be short and concise but there are exceptions. The time of delivery differs but it is usually between 1 AM to 5 AM. VALIDITY OF HASHTAGS A study has suggested that the more hashtags you use in the post, the less engagement rate it has. In order to receive higher engagement when using fewer hashtags in a post, with somewhere between one and three being the optimum amount. Judging by SXP usage of hashtags, you generally do good and kept the hashtags minimum, however, some of the post contains more than 10 hashtags and therefore, in the future try to cut the hashtags down on those.
  • 14. 13 BENCHMARKING ATTAINMENT BENCHMARKS – THE PLATFORM To benchmark the engagement levels for Sussex police, eight police Facebook pages were with similar population to two districts were analysed. The two Facebook pages from Sussex Police which were looked at were the ones with the largest population, Brighton & Hove with 290,3895 people and the lowest, Hastings with 92,236 people. The aim was to see how well posts made by Sussex Police’s Facebook pages engaged in comparison to posts made by law enforcement agencies throughout England. The table below shows the average number of likes, comments and shares per post for the month of December. Appendix shows the number of likes, comments and shares per post. METHODOLOGY 1. The law enforcement agency’s Facebook pages were chosen based on the population size which was closest to Brighton & Hove and Hastings. This was done by searching list of districts by population. 2. One month was chosen. This was December because it was the last month that was analysed in the one year period for Sussex Police. 3. The number of likes, comment and shares were manually counted per police Facebook page 4. Sad, angry , laughing faces and hearts were all counted as likes. 5. Engagement percentage was calculated by adding average likes, comment and shares and diving this by the number of posts and then calculating this as a percentage of the followers.
  • 15. 14 LIMITATIONS - Post reach could not be used to determine post engagement because we do not have access to same post data on other police Facebook pages. Therefore, we have to assume that the people who interact with the posts are followers. - Not all followers of that police page will see every post that is made. - Not everyone that engages with a post, follows the police Facebook page. Average likes, comments and shares for December 2019 District Populatio n Number of follower s % of populatio n following FB page Numb er of posts Averag e likes Average comme nts Averag e shares Engagemen t % Stockport Greater Manchester 291,775 19,314 6.62 28 127 20 71 0.040 Brighton & Hove Sussex 290,395 9,397 3.24 60 47 9 20 0.013 Greenwich Greater London 286,186 3,160 1.10 3 130 25 38 0.456 Walsall West Midlands 283,378 23,169 8.17 4 51 33 41 0.135 South Holland Lincolnshire 93,980 2,982 3.17 33 19 7 10 0.036 Three Rivers Hertfordshire 93,045 3,079 3.31 21 26 7 6 0.060 Hastings Sussex 92,236 12, 400 13.44 65 26 6 18 0.006 CastlePoint Essex 90,070 11,490 12.76 34 96 20 16 0.033
  • 16. 15 KEY FINDINGS - In comparison to the population size which is at the smaller end of scale of the districts analysed, with around 92,000 people. Hastings performed the best in having the largest number of people following their Facebook page with 13.44% of the population following them. - Brighton & Hove have one of the lowest percentages of population following the Facebook page with only 3.24%. This is considerably lower than other police districts of similar size to Brighton & Hove despite posting the most Facebook posts per month out of the four other districts. - Hastings also have a lower 25-44 aged population using social media with 21,293 people compared to the 86,621 people in Brighton & Hove. - As seen in Facebook insights, the age group which engage with posts the most are aged between 25-34. This is consistent with both districts with 19% of women and 10% of men in Hastings and 19% of women and 11% of men in Brighton & Hove. - In terms of frequency of posts both districts in Sussex have performed the best with over 60 posts in the month of December. This is vital for the distribution of information and a key aspect in engaging communities. - Brighton & Hove and Hastings both scored the lowest in terms of engagement. A reason why their posts don’t get as much engagement is because there are more repeated posts than any other police page. These have very low engagement as they don’t get as much interaction from followers.
  • 17. 16 RECOMMENDATIONS - Limit repeated posts of topics about anti-social driving, modern day slavery and fraud prevention to one post per month. These posts seem to have to lowest engagement. - Improve engagement in the age categories 18-24 and 55-64 by targeting posts which are relevant to these ages. - Increase the number of people following the Brighton & Hove Facebook page in the 15-24 age categories by targeting schools and universities so that the page is more known. This will help to improve engagement because the percentage of people using mobile social media is the highest than any other age group, at 98%. EXPECTATIONS FOR REACH AND IMPRESSION Average engagement per post (shares, likes and comments) for 11 districts District Average highest (shares, likes & comments) Average lowest (shares, likes & comments) Chichester 798.6 3 Crawley 220.7 2.5 Horsham 163.4 2.9 Eastbourne 155 2 Lewes 124.4 1.4 Mid Sussex 256.8 0 Brighton & Hove 398.1 0.8 Adur & Worthing 268 2.9 Arun 312.6 1 Rother 203.4 0 Hastings 343 1 Wealden 193.5 0
  • 18. 17 KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The highest reach is for a Facebook post by Sussex police is 178,922. The posts which have the highest reach are ones which include missing people. The average reach that a ‘good’ post would gain is around 50,000. - The lowest reach that a post would gain is around 188. This was found to be for posts like modern day slavery where they have been posted multiple times. Psychological structure called ‘Adaption’ states that once the same posts appears on peoples social media timelines, they become desensitised to the post therefore less likely to engage in the post. - The average engagement (comment, shares and likes) are shown for the 11 districts. The highest average engagement is 798.6 which is for Chichester. This is still a small fraction as their posts can reach a high of 268,962 people. - Chichester, Hastings and Brighton & Hove’s Facebook pages have the most followers. This is reflected on the engagement that they receive. - To improve engagement for Horsham and Lewes Facebook pages, they need to increase the number of followers they have.
  • 19. 18 LINKS VS NO LINKS, PHOTOS VS VIDEO The aim was to find out whether there is a positive correlation between posting photos or videos to have the most engagement. And to see if including links improves engagement in a post. METHODOLOGY 1. The top ten posts were looked at for each district in Sussex. The posts types were then counted and categorised between photos and videos. 2. The links were then counted and noted of whether they were photos, videos or statuses. 3. This was then repeated for the bottom ten posts LIMITATIONS All post types should be looked at and categorised between photos, videos and status to get a more accurate picture of correlation between photos, videos and engagement.
  • 20. 19 DISTRICT’S TOP 10 POSTS WITH THE HIGHEST REACH District Photos Videos Links Chichester 9 1 4 photos 1 video Crawley 10 6 photos Horsham 10 7 photos Eastbourne 9 7 photos Lewes 10 6 photos Mid Sussex 9 1 8 photos Brighton & Hove 8 2 6 photos 2 videos Adur & Worthing 8 1 7 photos 1 video Arun 10 4 photos Rother 10 3 photos Hastings 9 6 photos Wealden 9 1 3 photos DISTRICT’S BOTTOM 10 POSTS WITH LOWEST REACH District Photos Video Links Chichester 3 3 1 link Crawley 5 4 2 photos 1 video Horsham 3 7 2 photos 3 videos Eastbourne 8 2 3 photos Lewes 7 2 3 photos Mid Sussex 8 1 4 photos Brighton & Hove 5 2 2 videos 5 photos Adur & Worthing 7 1 link 2 photos Arun 3 3 2 links Rother 4 1 link Hastings 6 2 photos Wealden 6 2 1 link 1 photo 2 videos
  • 21. 20 KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Districts top posts all show that the highest reach include posts which include photos. - There is a preference for photos vs videos in the highest reaching posts. - In the districts lowest reaching posts there are more videos vs photos. - There is also more reach on posts which include links as the top 10 highest reaching posts all have more links compared to the bottom 10 lowest reaching posts. - Sussex police should include links in their posts to improve reach.
  • 22. 21 DEMOGRAPHIC INSIGHTS Followers Total population Facebook users % Ratio Eastbourne 6766 103054 81413 8% Hastings 12465 92236 72866 17% Lewes 5399 101381 80091 7% Rother 6362 93551 73905 9% Wealden 4766 157575 124484 4% Brighton & Hove 9275 289229 228491 4% Adur & Worthing 7824 112419 88811 9% Arun 13685 156997 124028 11% Chichester 12669 118175 93358 14% Crawley 10081 111375 87986 11% Horsham 6820 138018 109034 6% Mid Sussex 5884 147089 116200 5% 8% 17% 7% 9% 4% 4% 9% 11% 14% 11% 6% 5% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% Eastbourne Hastings Lew es Rother W ealden Brighton & Hove Adur& W orthing Arun Chichester Craw ley Horsham M id Sussex Ratio of followers relative to local population accessing Facebook (Meltwater data)
  • 23. 22 SURVEY RESULT We have conducted a survey and trying to find out what the public wants. However, the survey only has 35 responses, so it does not represent the vast majority therefore is only an insight. The survey was mostly responded by demographic of 18-34 with majority of people do not follow local/Sussex police Facebook page, and even when people follow the page, it appears that they don’t actively engage with the page. And for those who may considering follow the page, they would like to see more police dogs, positive updates as well as comedic posts. This can be seen with the most engaged post by the Corporate on the 20th of December. The survey has also suggested that better captions.
  • 24. 23 REFERENCES Essex- castle point Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/EPCastlePoint/ Fernandez, M., Cano, A. E., & Alani, H. (2014). Policing engagement via social media. In Aiello, L. M., & McFarland, D. Social Informatics 2014: Revised Selected Papers. London: Springer. 18-26. Greater London, Greenwich Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/MPSGreenwich/?__tn__=%2Cd%2CP- R&eid=ARAIxhnYjq7zHWWfMl9RnRCKrKh1_LAbPnaOOBnxoTd0pPTgDxtMesaVLe5C_ZY_y6Z2lYk mZ7WHltcZ Greater Manchester, Stockport Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/GMPStockport/ Hertfordshire, Three rivers Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/ThreeRiversPolice/?__tn__=%2Cd%2CP - R&eid=ARAmkLKSt1ApgD2skjF1CvcV7OF60W5h8UjIWWVSRHNnDH_DDYo- MNnPXlItnJ3xlow3PStYoIu7NQsU Lieberman, J. D., Koetzle, D., & Sakiyama, M. (2013). Police Departments Use of Facebook: Patterns and Policy Issues. Policy Quarterly, 16 (4), 438-462. Lincolnshire, South Holland Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/SouthHollandPolice/?ref=search&__tn__=%2Cd%2CP- R&eid=ARDSSV4cmEjyQhuVkvs7eYfFlqCRFgqwxFvaZunF5p1tf3hAOz- V59_SxrEUxtXAdcyMFT_N2xBpaT_g List of districts by population - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_districts_by_population Sussex, Brighton and Hove Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/BrightonHovePolice/ Sussex, Hastings Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/hastingspoliceuk/ Van de Velde, B., Meijer, A., & Homburg, V. (2015). Police message diffusion on Twitter: Analysing the reach of social media communications. Behaviour & Information Technology,34(1), 4–16. West midlands, Walsall Facebook page- https://www.facebook.com/walsallpolice/ Wood, M. A. (2020). Policing’s ‘meme strategy’: understanding the rise of police social media engagement work. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 32(1), 40–58.
  • 25. 24 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 Graphs for the reach ratios for each district separately, presented as percentage. Showing the Top and Bottom 10 posts.
  • 26. 25
  • 27. 26
  • 28. 27
  • 29. 28
  • 30. 29
  • 31. 30 APPENDIX 2 District Population Number of followers Number of posts Average likes Average comments Average shares Stockport Greater Manchester 291,775 19,314 28 79, 159,109, 26, 87, 149, 368,144, 260, 54, 44, 129,159, 26, 134, 35,45, 419, 402, 24, 65, 280,155, 56, 78, 36, 22, 21 =3565 127 1,8, 32, 7, 6, 24, 51, 53, 49, 3, 11, 22, 7, 18, 24, 2, 14, 48, 31, 4, 6, 49, 69, 14 =553 20 4, 9, 4, 4, 2, 18, 19, 128, 50, 1, 9, 10, 2, 19, 2, 1, 20, 1600,8,9, 49, 7, 2, 2, 1, 2, 10 =1992 71 Brighton & Hove Sussex 290,395 9,397 60 38, 18,34, 36, 39, 45, 42, 49, 19, 91,22, 55, 22, 226,60, 127, 77, 13,49, 39, 9, 8, 90, 89, 18, 63, 36, 37,132, 1,22,9, 18, 60, 49, 26, 29, 122,45, 33, 25, 11, 31, 16, 24,7, 4, 61, 22, 14, 148,32, 77, 6, 158, 35,15, 41, 56, 37 =2817 47 1, 2, 3, 17,3, 4,2, 12, 15, 21, 2, 10, 1, 30, 22, 51, 23, 8, 14, 4, 3, 3, 5, 23, 2, 10, 1, 1, 7, 2, 3, 1,4, 30, 1, 4, 6, 10, 4, 3, 9, 2, 12, 3, 39, 3, 43, 1, 23, 39,4 =546 9 6, 2, 3, 18, 2, 3, 5, 5,6, 53, 7, 2,4, 6, 17, 183, 164, 4, 50, 1, 15, 3, 7, 2, 14, 21, 2, 3, 5, 1, 14, 7, 1, 2, 2, 3, 1, 17, 46,7, 14, 31, 3, 26, 19, 16, 5, 183, 23, 23, 74, 54 =1185 20 Greenwich Greater London 286,186 3,160 3 306, 27,58 =391 130 63, 2, 10 =75 25 94, 20 =114 38 Walsall West Midlands 283,378 23,169 4 41, 46, 14, 102 =203 51 45, 11, 3, 72 =131 33 19, 9, 75, 60 =163 41 South Holland Lincolnshire 93,980 2,982 33 60, 2, 1, 6, 3, 15, 25, 86, 42, 34, 10,6, 51, 2, 24, 29, 14, 26, 15, 12, 49, 17, 13,10, 10, 46, 1, 4, 1, 8, 4 =626 19 8, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 15, 33, 14, 12, 2, 6, 35, 25, 2, 17, 5, 34, 5, 17, 2, 1 =239 7 6, 2, 2, 4, 1, 2, 37, 7,7, 18, 1, 9, 1, 7, 65, 35, 4, 11, 3, 1, 10, 3, 11, 22, 20, 35, 3, 2 =339 10 Three Rivers Hertfordshire 93,045 3,079 21 70, 16, 50, 1, 53, 28, 12, 18, 21, 4, 49, 51, 9, 21, 3, 6, 4, 5, 62, 12, 51 =546 8, 13, 8, 14, 3, 22, 1, 5, 41, 2, 5, 2, 10, 4 =138 5, 41, 10, 7, 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 1, 18, 11, 4, 7, 4, 1 =131
  • 32. 31 26 7 6 Hastings Sussex 92,236 12, 400 65 217, 1, 77, 90,5, 3, 38, 14, 2, 18, 10, 15, 23, 5, 101, 7, 288 75, 3, 4, 5, 4, 2, 7, 68,5,8, 17, 9, 6, 85, 39, 43, 1, 5, 3, 9, 8, 3, 5, 4, 7,8, 2, 5, 58, 6,6, 3, 5, 67, 7, 19, 17, 13, 8, 67, 2, 4, 33, 4, 1, 32, 13, 2 =1721 26 46, 9, 34, 10, 5, 3, 15, 3, 8, 13, 36, 64, 2, 1, 7, 24, 6, 6, 13, 6, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 13, 15, 11, 3, 14, 3, 2, 2, 10, 8, 10, 3 =411 6 43, 14, 8, 2, 86, 15, 39, 18, 4, 6, 4, 2, 4, 80, 517,1, 5, 7, 1, 2, 3, 48, 6, 3, 16, 2, 23, 4, 1, 17, 4, 2, 8, 11, 2, 4, 4, 6, 8, 3, 16, 2, 2, 8, 2, 5, 30, 3, 1, 22, 4, 2, 16, 20, 3, 14, 3, 6 =1192 18 CastlePoint Essex 90,070 11,490 34 15, 121,177, 33, 158, 234, 21,75, 150, 130, 122, 100,180, 59, 63, 170, 27,11, 45, 295, 78, 143,101, 18, 80, 154, 26,98, 50, 47, 69, 74, 74, 55 =3253 96 4, 20, 30, 35, 24, 28, 6, 1, 13, 35, 28, 7, 35, 14,3, 21, 51, 1, 3, 100, 5, 28, 9, 11, 34, 3, 11, 3, 12, 13, 9, 12 =692 20 2, 11, 16, 80, 12, 13, 23, 4, 33, 7, 7, 2, 14, 4, 10, 25, 3, 1, 47, 2, 19, 10, 15, 5, 52, 19, 8, 9, 16, 17, 9, 4 =532 16