it is about our FRilipino values, we can learned on this about what kind of attitude we or a person has especially if we are studying about psychology it will help you alot in studying about a person attitude and gives us an idea of how can we categorized a person based on their attituted towards us.

2. Values do not belong exclusively to Filipinos. But certain universal
values find different meaning and application within the experiential and
historical circumstances of the Filipino. What we call Filipino values is those
derive from our culture or way of life, from “our distinctive way of becoming
human in this particular place and time
The values of the Filipinos spring from their peculiar way of viewing
life, its origin, its meaning, and its purpose.
 Pananalig sa maykapal
 Pag-ibig, pakikipag-kapwa, pagpapahalaga sa familia, hiya,
utang na loob
 Dangal, amor propio, delicadeza, and palabra de honor.
FILIPINO VALUES

3. FILIPINO MORAL IDEAL
Filipinos subscribe to the concept of moral integrity
as the ideal ultimately desirable ideal. Success is
measured in terms of moral respectability.
“Di baling mahirap, basta’t may dangal”
expresses this noble aspiration.

4. OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE
VALUES
Values are both objective and subjective. They
are objective in the sense that they are things
that are valuable and desirable. They are
subjective in the sense that they presuppose a
subject, that is, a person who is valuing or
experiencing such value.

5. DOUBLE-STANDARD
MENTALITY
The Filipino moral behavior is characterized
as ambivalent, meaning, that the Filipino is
comfortable with a double-standard mentality.
Plainly, the values recognized are allowed to play a
dual role not unlike that of Jekyll and Hyde.
“The truth”, says Fr. Gorospe, “is that Filipino
values are ambivalent in the sense that they are
potential for good or evil, they may help or hinder
personal and national development, depending on
how they are understood or practiced or lived.”

6. Fr. Gorospe traces the roots of double-standard
morality to the adherence of Filipinos to false
norms of morality.
Accordingly, Filipinos judge what is right or
wrong on the basis of (1) group-centeredness or
“group-thinking, or (2) on the basis of shame and
fear of authority figure.

7. The solution of the moral ambiguity of the Filipinos depends largely
on the attitude towards the problem itself. Three difficulties must
be overcome: ignorance, complacency, and rationalization.
Filipinos must be made aware of the problem. One who is not aware
of an illness does not go to a doctor.
Complacency is the feeling of being comfortable with the present
state of affairs. It leads one to be indifferent to existing problems.
Rationalization is the mental turning away from the real issues. It is
an attitude intended to escape responsibility. It is a ready excuse
for doing what is wrong.
REORIENTATION OF ATTITUDES

8. MORAL COMMITMENT
Values are not acquired genetically; they are personally
cultivated and lived. They involve a commitment where one
submits himself to the rational demands of his intellect for truth
and the moral demands of the will to abide by what is good.
Commitment implies responsibility. A responsible person is
one who can think for himself and make his own decisions
independently for others.

9. CHARACTERISTIC OF RESPONSIBLE
PERSON
Fr. Gorospe speaks of moral commitment as a response to the
Christian ideals. The characteristics he describes however
apply to man as man insofar as man must be committed to
the good of his nature. After all, before one is a Christian, he
must first be a good man.
A responsible person has the following qualities:
1. A responsible person has the ability to differentiate between
what is essential and accidental.
2. A responsible person has the ability to internalize his values.

10. CORE VALUES OF THE NEW FILIPINO
Moral maturity is a process of conversion. It means shedding
off the old self and putting on the new self. For the conversion to
be total, it must work from within the person.
 Truth, Love and Faith
 Hard work
 Integrity
 Social Justice

11. GROUP 4 ANGELOU S. BERONIO
ARIANE B. ROMASANTA
CLARK KENT R. SESE
RENZ RAMIEL CAMALIGAN