THE FIBONACCI   PROJECT Mateja Grašič www.fibonacci-project.eu MATEJA GRAŠIČ,  [email_address] , Primary School MARIJE VERE, SLOVENIA SCIENTIX, Roundtable for teachers  08.05.2011 - Brussels
3 pillars as core structuring elements   1.   IBSME in primary and secondary schools 2.  Local initiative for innovation  &  sustainability 3.  Twinning strategy for IBSME spreading    Film
Services  &  resources  provided to teachers In each partner country, at a local level: sessions of professional development learning resources, material support, follow-up of teachers; peer-learning assessment
14 sets for pupils 1 set for teacher 10 different sests SEPTEMBER 2008
We made a list of topics witch we will teach with Pollen boxes : In  the  first  grade : classification, movement,  Swimming and sink ing . In  the  second  grade : classification,  movement, measuring, In  the  third  grade : light and shadow,  measuring, In  the  fourth  grade : electricity, Separation of mixtures. In  the  fifth  grade : electricity, Weather.
Same experiment
Each group do different experiment
I  was in Serbia and Romania in workshops with national co-ordinator Ana Blagotinšek.  I m ade contacts with several  primary  teachers, but teacher s  in our school did not take the opportunit y  for  the  international cooperation. How to impress them to cooperate, to exchange experiences ...  Primary  teachers have difficulty with English, English teacher  with  sciences ....
As I mentioned  before , I put  a lot of my spare time  on work ing  with  primary teachers.  If  we  want high-quality research in science teaching  with  Fibonacci  boxes it  is necessary to have two teachers in the classroom. But I have to find another option,  because it is difficult to combine teaching and working in  project .   I f you have any suggestions or examples of good practice .
We change a  methods,  last year  all  pupils  ha d to do  one experiment  and  we discussed the topic for 2  lessons , this year  pupil s circulate among the experiments in the classroom  and we  spend four  lessons for   topic . I expect  some  feedback  from  teachers  and each will  decided  witch metod  suits  .  The response  surprised  me,  the  majority chose  the first (last year's method of teaching), I believe that  is so  because  pupils  are more  easy  controlled. I would still like to see that  pupil s  work individually, but  we must do  this year's method of work. I do not know whether I  should be  satisfied that  teachers are  finally  beg i n ing to  wor k , or should, after two years ,  plan to  do more ,  but  I do not want  to put  too much pressure on teachers.  So do you have any suggestions for future?

Fibonacci round table grasic

  • 1.
    THE FIBONACCI PROJECT Mateja Grašič www.fibonacci-project.eu MATEJA GRAŠIČ, [email_address] , Primary School MARIJE VERE, SLOVENIA SCIENTIX, Roundtable for teachers 08.05.2011 - Brussels
  • 2.
    3 pillars ascore structuring elements 1. IBSME in primary and secondary schools 2. Local initiative for innovation & sustainability 3. Twinning strategy for IBSME spreading  Film
  • 3.
    Services & resources provided to teachers In each partner country, at a local level: sessions of professional development learning resources, material support, follow-up of teachers; peer-learning assessment
  • 4.
    14 sets forpupils 1 set for teacher 10 different sests SEPTEMBER 2008
  • 5.
    We made alist of topics witch we will teach with Pollen boxes : In the first grade : classification, movement, Swimming and sink ing . In the second grade : classification, movement, measuring, In the third grade : light and shadow, measuring, In the fourth grade : electricity, Separation of mixtures. In the fifth grade : electricity, Weather.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Each group dodifferent experiment
  • 8.
    I wasin Serbia and Romania in workshops with national co-ordinator Ana Blagotinšek. I m ade contacts with several primary teachers, but teacher s in our school did not take the opportunit y for the international cooperation. How to impress them to cooperate, to exchange experiences ... Primary teachers have difficulty with English, English teacher with sciences ....
  • 9.
    As I mentioned before , I put a lot of my spare time on work ing with primary teachers. If we want high-quality research in science teaching with Fibonacci boxes it is necessary to have two teachers in the classroom. But I have to find another option, because it is difficult to combine teaching and working in project . I f you have any suggestions or examples of good practice .
  • 10.
    We change a methods, last year all pupils ha d to do one experiment and we discussed the topic for 2 lessons , this year pupil s circulate among the experiments in the classroom and we spend four lessons for topic . I expect some feedback from teachers and each will decided witch metod suits . The response surprised me, the majority chose the first (last year's method of teaching), I believe that is so because pupils are more easy controlled. I would still like to see that pupil s work individually, but we must do this year's method of work. I do not know whether I should be satisfied that teachers are finally beg i n ing to wor k , or should, after two years , plan to do more , but I do not want to put too much pressure on teachers. So do you have any suggestions for future?