Feedback on My Contents Page

1. FEEDBACK ON MY CONTENTS
PAGE

2. TO SUMMARISE – DID YOU LIKE MY COVER?
Every person, who done my survey on
my contents page, said that they liked
it.

3. TO SUMMARISE - COLOUR
 The colour matched the house style and followed on through out the front cover
and the contents, which gave it a ‘professional look’
 The colours were conventional for similar magazines like Rolling Stone and Q. This
showed that the colours were seen to be sophisticated and follow the rules or
conventions of a normal mainstream magazine with a similar audience class.

4. TO SUMMARISE - LAYOUT
 The articles and page were split into three thirds which is conventional for other
magazines.
 The images would take up to thirds and the writing taking up the final third, this
makes the importance of other articles obvious, so most popular articles can be
found quicker
 A criticism was that there may not have been enough information in the table of
contents

5. TO SUMMARISE -FONT
 There wernt any different fonts on the contents page which would contrast each
other, this maybe could be improved to show again, importance of other articles.
 There should also be some writing upon the images to act as captions.
 Although the fonts were all relevant for the type of magazine.

6. TO SUMMARISE -IMAGE
 The image of the female, leaking out of the box gave it an effect of breaking the
walls and showing a more modern take on the layout.
 The images which were larger showed importance. Though 4 images, the image
were minimal so kept in with the conventional take on the mainstream magazine