This paper summarizes the planning meeting held in Hawassa, Ethiopia, from 23-25 September 20114, for CIMMYTY’s Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Cropping Systems for Food Security in Eastern and Southern Africa (SIMLESA) Phase 2 program. The meeting focused on streamlining project activities to meet objectives of the second phase (SIMLESA 11).
The document summarizes the role of various frontline extension systems in India established by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). It discusses programs such as National Demonstrations (1966), Operational Research Projects (1972), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (1974), Lab to Land (1979), Frontline Demonstrations, Technology Assessment and Refinement, National Agricultural Technology Project (NATP), Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA), National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), and the Horticultural Mission. The primary roles of these programs were to demonstrate new agricultural technologies to farmers, test technologies in farmers' fields, train extension workers and farmers, and disseminate improved practices to increase production and incomes.
The document discusses three Indian agricultural initiatives: NAIP, KCC, and ATIC. NAIP aims to accelerate sustainable agricultural transformation through innovation and partnerships. Its objectives include building ICAR capacity and promoting production to consumption systems research. KCC provides extension services to farmers through call centers, where subject matter experts answer queries in local languages. ATICs disseminate technologies and information through diagnostic services, product distribution, and information sharing, acting as single windows for farmers.
The document summarizes the major organizational systems working for rural development in India. It discusses the four main streams: 1) ICAR institutes and agricultural universities, 2) Ministry of Agriculture extension systems, 3) Ministry of Rural Development extension systems, and 4) voluntary organizations. It then provides details on several key extension programs established by ICAR, including National Demonstrations (1964), Operational Research Projects (1972), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (1974), Lab to Land programs (1979), Frontline Demonstrations, and Technology Assessment and Refinement programs. It discusses the objectives and roles of these various extension programs.
ATMA (Agriculture Technology Management Agency) is a registered society responsible for agricultural technology dissemination at the district level in Uttar Pradesh. It aims to decentralize decision making, increase farmer input, and improve coordination between research and extension activities. ATMA has a Governing Board that makes policies and a Management Committee responsible for planning and executing activities. It works to strengthen research-farmer linkages, coordinate different agricultural agencies, disseminate new technologies, and increase farmer ownership of the agricultural system. A case study describes how a farmer in Jharkhand increased her paddy yields from 16 to 82 quintals per hectare by adopting improved practices and technologies disseminated through ATMA.
The scientists of Peermade Development Society (PDS), an NGO based in Idukki, Kerala,
India, have initiated an approach ‘Land to Lab’ for the participatory technology development of
farmers’ innovations and unique traditional knowledge practices. [...] A large number of innovative practices, technological innovations and unique traditional practices have been identified and documented. [...] Value-added knowledge practices and innovations are disseminated through various commercial and noncommercial sectors. [...] The paper describes the ‘Land to Lab’ approach, achievements and
experiences, lessons learnt and major constraints.
Innovation in technology Dissemination : ATMANishu Kanwar
The document discusses the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) model for agricultural extension and technology dissemination. [1] The ATMA is an autonomous organization at the district level responsible for coordinating technology transfer activities between various government departments, research organizations, NGOs, and other agricultural stakeholders. [2] It aims to integrate extension programs, link research and extension, and decentralize decision making through farmer participation. [3] The ATMA is managed by a Governing Board and Management Committee which oversees planning, implementation, and monitoring of extension activities.
The document summarizes the role of various frontline extension systems in India established by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). It discusses programs such as National Demonstrations (1966), Operational Research Projects (1972), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (1974), Lab to Land (1979), Frontline Demonstrations, Technology Assessment and Refinement, National Agricultural Technology Project (NATP), Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA), National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), and the Horticultural Mission. The primary roles of these programs were to demonstrate new agricultural technologies to farmers, test technologies in farmers' fields, train extension workers and farmers, and disseminate improved practices to increase production and incomes.
The document discusses three Indian agricultural initiatives: NAIP, KCC, and ATIC. NAIP aims to accelerate sustainable agricultural transformation through innovation and partnerships. Its objectives include building ICAR capacity and promoting production to consumption systems research. KCC provides extension services to farmers through call centers, where subject matter experts answer queries in local languages. ATICs disseminate technologies and information through diagnostic services, product distribution, and information sharing, acting as single windows for farmers.
The document summarizes the major organizational systems working for rural development in India. It discusses the four main streams: 1) ICAR institutes and agricultural universities, 2) Ministry of Agriculture extension systems, 3) Ministry of Rural Development extension systems, and 4) voluntary organizations. It then provides details on several key extension programs established by ICAR, including National Demonstrations (1964), Operational Research Projects (1972), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (1974), Lab to Land programs (1979), Frontline Demonstrations, and Technology Assessment and Refinement programs. It discusses the objectives and roles of these various extension programs.
ATMA (Agriculture Technology Management Agency) is a registered society responsible for agricultural technology dissemination at the district level in Uttar Pradesh. It aims to decentralize decision making, increase farmer input, and improve coordination between research and extension activities. ATMA has a Governing Board that makes policies and a Management Committee responsible for planning and executing activities. It works to strengthen research-farmer linkages, coordinate different agricultural agencies, disseminate new technologies, and increase farmer ownership of the agricultural system. A case study describes how a farmer in Jharkhand increased her paddy yields from 16 to 82 quintals per hectare by adopting improved practices and technologies disseminated through ATMA.
The scientists of Peermade Development Society (PDS), an NGO based in Idukki, Kerala,
India, have initiated an approach ‘Land to Lab’ for the participatory technology development of
farmers’ innovations and unique traditional knowledge practices. [...] A large number of innovative practices, technological innovations and unique traditional practices have been identified and documented. [...] Value-added knowledge practices and innovations are disseminated through various commercial and noncommercial sectors. [...] The paper describes the ‘Land to Lab’ approach, achievements and
experiences, lessons learnt and major constraints.
Innovation in technology Dissemination : ATMANishu Kanwar
The document discusses the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) model for agricultural extension and technology dissemination. [1] The ATMA is an autonomous organization at the district level responsible for coordinating technology transfer activities between various government departments, research organizations, NGOs, and other agricultural stakeholders. [2] It aims to integrate extension programs, link research and extension, and decentralize decision making through farmer participation. [3] The ATMA is managed by a Governing Board and Management Committee which oversees planning, implementation, and monitoring of extension activities.
The Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) was launched in 2005-2006 to strengthen research-extension-farmer linkages and provide coordination between agencies involved in technology dissemination at the district level. ATMA is a registered society that operates at the district level with participation from farmers, NGOs, agricultural universities, and other local stakeholders. Its objectives include improving technology dissemination, increasing farmer input, developing public-private partnerships, and adopting a bottom-up planning process. ATMA activities focus on farmer training programs, demonstrations, field visits, and capacity building to transfer new agricultural technologies to farmers.
The document outlines the organizational structure and key roles of the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA). ATMA aims to coordinate agricultural extension activities across departments at the district level. It has a Governing Board that oversees strategic planning and funding allocation. Below the Board, an ATMA Management Committee coordinates annual action plans and block-level Farm Information and Advisory Centres. The committee also provides reports and acts as secretariat to the Board.
This document summarizes several projects of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) including: National Demonstrations, Operational Research Projects, Krishi Vigyan Kendras, Lab to Land Program, Extension Education Institutes, Trainers Training Centre, Tribal Area Research Project, Land to Lab Program, and Scheduled Caste & Other Backward Caste project. It provides details on the objectives, activities, and achievements of these various programs which aim to conduct agricultural research and transfer technologies to farmers through demonstrations, training programs, and institution-village linkage programs.
The agricultural extension system in India plays a key role in enhancing food production and shifting focus from only production to also commercial farming and agribusiness. The system involves policies and programs from the central government and state-specific development programs. The ICAR is the national body that supports research and technology transfer models. State agricultural universities also develop extension models. Voluntary organizations implement extension projects. The system bridges research centers and farmers through extension personnel.
- Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) is a district level farm science centre that helps transfer technology from research institutes to farmers' fields. The first KVK was established in 1974 in Puducherry. There are currently 634 KVKs across India managed by ICAR.
- KVKs aim to empower farmers through learning, applying technologies, and improving livelihoods. Their mandates include on-farm testing, demonstrations, training programs, and vocational training.
- This specific KVK document outlines strategies adopted for sustainable agriculture development in Jharkhand, including remunerative, climate-smart, and diversified agricultural practices. It also provides a SWOT analysis of the Ramak
The document summarizes India's agricultural extension systems. It discusses four major organizational streams that work for rural development: ICAR institutes and universities, state agriculture departments, rural development departments, and voluntary organizations. It then provides details on several specific extension programs established by ICAR, including National Demonstrations (1964), Operational Research Projects (1972), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (1974), Lab to Land (1979), and Frontline Demonstrations. It describes the objectives and roles of these various extension initiatives in demonstrating and disseminating new agricultural technologies to farmers.
KVKs (Krishi Vigyan Kendras) are agricultural extension centers established by the Government of India to assess and demonstrate agricultural technologies to farmers and enhance their skills. The first KVK was established in 1974 in Puducherry and there are now 645 KVKs across India with 106 more planned. KVKs conduct on-farm testing, demonstrations, training programs, provide advisories to farmers, and produce and distribute technological products and inputs to improve local agriculture.
This professional system of extension is based on frequent training of extension workers and regular field visits for onward guiding the farmers in agricultural production and raising their income by providing appropriate plans for country development.
KVK (Krishi Vigyan Kendra ) :- Introducation of kvk ,
objectives of kvk ,
mandate and activities of kvk ,
organizational structure of kvk ,
Role and responsibility of the kvk ,
strategies for working in kvk
This document provides an overview of the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) model for agricultural extension in India. Some key points:
1) ATMA was introduced to decentralize decision-making and integrate extension programs across departments through district-level agencies.
2) ATMA establishes Farm Information and Advisory Centers at the block level to coordinate extension activities. It includes Block Technology Teams of officers and Farmers Advisory Committees of farmers.
3) The goal is to make extension more participatory, market-driven, and oriented toward increasing farm incomes through organizing farmers into interest groups.
Agricultural Development Associates Program(Krusi Unnat
sahajogi) is one of its kind apprenticeship program in the
country, which aims to leverage the final year undergraduate
students in improving the extension activities in the focus
blocks of the state. The students were employed as an agent
of change on the ground.
1) The document discusses the establishment of a Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) in Berasia, Madhya Pradesh.
2) Key criteria for KVK site selection include having at least 20 hectares of contiguous land with a permanent water source, being surrounded by multiple villages, and located in an accessible central part of the tehsil.
3) The proposed land for the Berasia KVK meets these criteria, being surrounded by over 10 villages and near schools and civic amenities. ICAR provides funding to KVKs through zonal project directorates.
National Mission on Agriculture ExtensionNishu Kanwar
The National Mission on Agricultural Extension and Technology (NMAET) was implemented during India's 12th Five Year Plan to amalgamate 17 agricultural schemes and promote the adoption of critical agricultural inputs and improved practices. It included four sub-missions focusing on agricultural extension, seeds and planting materials, mechanization, and plant protection. The mission aimed to make these key inputs more available and increase farmers' access to information through extension services using methods like farmer groups, demonstrations, and interactive digital technologies.
Photo report of the Training of Trainers on Scaling of Africa RISING Project ...africa-rising
The document summarizes a three-day training event on scaling validated technologies from the Africa RISING project in the Ethiopian highlands. Over the three days, participants received briefings and presentations from scientists on topics like gender integration, crop and livestock development innovations from Phase I, and plans for Phase II. Group training sessions covered feed and forage management, crops, and natural resource management. Participants discussed implementation plans and asked questions. Partners in the Africa RISING project in Ethiopia include universities, research organizations, agricultural offices, and the Agricultural Transformation Agency. The event aimed to train participants on scaling technologies to improve food security and livelihoods in Ethiopia.
This document lists several agricultural development programs implemented in India between 1960-2000 including:
- The Intensive Agriculture Development Program (IADP) launched in 1960 to provide loans, seeds, and tools to farmers.
- The High Yielding Variety Program (HYVP) launched in 1966 to increase food grain productivity through adoption of improved varieties and inputs.
- The Small Farmers Development Agency (SFDA) and Marginal Farmers and Agricultural Labor Agency (MFALA) launched in 1973 and 1974 respectively to provide technical and financial assistance to small and marginal farmers.
The document discusses the history and evolution of agricultural extension in India from the 1960s onwards. It describes early programs like the Package Programme launched in 1960 to increase food production and economic wellbeing. This was followed by the Area Approach program in 1964 targeting over 1000 blocks across India. Later programs included the Technology Assessment and Refinement Program to generate appropriate technologies for small farms, wasteland development initiatives starting in 1973, and the World Bank aided National Agricultural Technology Project from 1998 to improve research and dissemination.
The document summarizes several growth-oriented agricultural programs launched by the Indian government between the 1950s-1990s. The Intensive Agricultural District Programme was launched in 1960-1961 to rapidly increase farm production through complementary inputs and services. The High Yielding Varieties Programme introduced high-yielding wheat, paddy and maize seeds starting in 1964-1965 to boost agricultural output. Operation Flood, starting in 1970, organized dairy cooperatives to increase milk production, procurement, and rural incomes.
CLTS as a working approach: Experiences of Plan EthiopiaIRC
- The document discusses Plan Ethiopia's experience with introducing the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach to improve sanitation and hygiene in rural communities.
- CLTS was first introduced in Shebedino District in 2007 and saw promising results, with some villages achieving open defecation free status within months.
- The approach empowered communities to develop and implement their own sanitation solutions without relying on subsidies. It has since been scaled up to other areas managed by Plan Ethiopia.
PHAST CIC is a social enterprise consultancy established by former NHS public health executives. Mike helped establish PHAST's organizational framework and governance structures so it could begin operating immediately to serve NHS clients. He ensured suitable banking, legal, and accounting partners were identified. The establishment deliverables were completed within a few months. Mike then assumed the role of Company Secretary to help solidly establish PHAST as a niche public health consulting organization. Mike provided strategic guidance and commercial consultancy that helped PHAST secure major contracts and create efficient business systems to adapt to changing healthcare needs.
The Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) was launched in 2005-2006 to strengthen research-extension-farmer linkages and provide coordination between agencies involved in technology dissemination at the district level. ATMA is a registered society that operates at the district level with participation from farmers, NGOs, agricultural universities, and other local stakeholders. Its objectives include improving technology dissemination, increasing farmer input, developing public-private partnerships, and adopting a bottom-up planning process. ATMA activities focus on farmer training programs, demonstrations, field visits, and capacity building to transfer new agricultural technologies to farmers.
The document outlines the organizational structure and key roles of the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA). ATMA aims to coordinate agricultural extension activities across departments at the district level. It has a Governing Board that oversees strategic planning and funding allocation. Below the Board, an ATMA Management Committee coordinates annual action plans and block-level Farm Information and Advisory Centres. The committee also provides reports and acts as secretariat to the Board.
This document summarizes several projects of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) including: National Demonstrations, Operational Research Projects, Krishi Vigyan Kendras, Lab to Land Program, Extension Education Institutes, Trainers Training Centre, Tribal Area Research Project, Land to Lab Program, and Scheduled Caste & Other Backward Caste project. It provides details on the objectives, activities, and achievements of these various programs which aim to conduct agricultural research and transfer technologies to farmers through demonstrations, training programs, and institution-village linkage programs.
The agricultural extension system in India plays a key role in enhancing food production and shifting focus from only production to also commercial farming and agribusiness. The system involves policies and programs from the central government and state-specific development programs. The ICAR is the national body that supports research and technology transfer models. State agricultural universities also develop extension models. Voluntary organizations implement extension projects. The system bridges research centers and farmers through extension personnel.
- Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) is a district level farm science centre that helps transfer technology from research institutes to farmers' fields. The first KVK was established in 1974 in Puducherry. There are currently 634 KVKs across India managed by ICAR.
- KVKs aim to empower farmers through learning, applying technologies, and improving livelihoods. Their mandates include on-farm testing, demonstrations, training programs, and vocational training.
- This specific KVK document outlines strategies adopted for sustainable agriculture development in Jharkhand, including remunerative, climate-smart, and diversified agricultural practices. It also provides a SWOT analysis of the Ramak
The document summarizes India's agricultural extension systems. It discusses four major organizational streams that work for rural development: ICAR institutes and universities, state agriculture departments, rural development departments, and voluntary organizations. It then provides details on several specific extension programs established by ICAR, including National Demonstrations (1964), Operational Research Projects (1972), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (1974), Lab to Land (1979), and Frontline Demonstrations. It describes the objectives and roles of these various extension initiatives in demonstrating and disseminating new agricultural technologies to farmers.
KVKs (Krishi Vigyan Kendras) are agricultural extension centers established by the Government of India to assess and demonstrate agricultural technologies to farmers and enhance their skills. The first KVK was established in 1974 in Puducherry and there are now 645 KVKs across India with 106 more planned. KVKs conduct on-farm testing, demonstrations, training programs, provide advisories to farmers, and produce and distribute technological products and inputs to improve local agriculture.
This professional system of extension is based on frequent training of extension workers and regular field visits for onward guiding the farmers in agricultural production and raising their income by providing appropriate plans for country development.
KVK (Krishi Vigyan Kendra ) :- Introducation of kvk ,
objectives of kvk ,
mandate and activities of kvk ,
organizational structure of kvk ,
Role and responsibility of the kvk ,
strategies for working in kvk
This document provides an overview of the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) model for agricultural extension in India. Some key points:
1) ATMA was introduced to decentralize decision-making and integrate extension programs across departments through district-level agencies.
2) ATMA establishes Farm Information and Advisory Centers at the block level to coordinate extension activities. It includes Block Technology Teams of officers and Farmers Advisory Committees of farmers.
3) The goal is to make extension more participatory, market-driven, and oriented toward increasing farm incomes through organizing farmers into interest groups.
Agricultural Development Associates Program(Krusi Unnat
sahajogi) is one of its kind apprenticeship program in the
country, which aims to leverage the final year undergraduate
students in improving the extension activities in the focus
blocks of the state. The students were employed as an agent
of change on the ground.
1) The document discusses the establishment of a Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) in Berasia, Madhya Pradesh.
2) Key criteria for KVK site selection include having at least 20 hectares of contiguous land with a permanent water source, being surrounded by multiple villages, and located in an accessible central part of the tehsil.
3) The proposed land for the Berasia KVK meets these criteria, being surrounded by over 10 villages and near schools and civic amenities. ICAR provides funding to KVKs through zonal project directorates.
National Mission on Agriculture ExtensionNishu Kanwar
The National Mission on Agricultural Extension and Technology (NMAET) was implemented during India's 12th Five Year Plan to amalgamate 17 agricultural schemes and promote the adoption of critical agricultural inputs and improved practices. It included four sub-missions focusing on agricultural extension, seeds and planting materials, mechanization, and plant protection. The mission aimed to make these key inputs more available and increase farmers' access to information through extension services using methods like farmer groups, demonstrations, and interactive digital technologies.
Photo report of the Training of Trainers on Scaling of Africa RISING Project ...africa-rising
The document summarizes a three-day training event on scaling validated technologies from the Africa RISING project in the Ethiopian highlands. Over the three days, participants received briefings and presentations from scientists on topics like gender integration, crop and livestock development innovations from Phase I, and plans for Phase II. Group training sessions covered feed and forage management, crops, and natural resource management. Participants discussed implementation plans and asked questions. Partners in the Africa RISING project in Ethiopia include universities, research organizations, agricultural offices, and the Agricultural Transformation Agency. The event aimed to train participants on scaling technologies to improve food security and livelihoods in Ethiopia.
This document lists several agricultural development programs implemented in India between 1960-2000 including:
- The Intensive Agriculture Development Program (IADP) launched in 1960 to provide loans, seeds, and tools to farmers.
- The High Yielding Variety Program (HYVP) launched in 1966 to increase food grain productivity through adoption of improved varieties and inputs.
- The Small Farmers Development Agency (SFDA) and Marginal Farmers and Agricultural Labor Agency (MFALA) launched in 1973 and 1974 respectively to provide technical and financial assistance to small and marginal farmers.
The document discusses the history and evolution of agricultural extension in India from the 1960s onwards. It describes early programs like the Package Programme launched in 1960 to increase food production and economic wellbeing. This was followed by the Area Approach program in 1964 targeting over 1000 blocks across India. Later programs included the Technology Assessment and Refinement Program to generate appropriate technologies for small farms, wasteland development initiatives starting in 1973, and the World Bank aided National Agricultural Technology Project from 1998 to improve research and dissemination.
The document summarizes several growth-oriented agricultural programs launched by the Indian government between the 1950s-1990s. The Intensive Agricultural District Programme was launched in 1960-1961 to rapidly increase farm production through complementary inputs and services. The High Yielding Varieties Programme introduced high-yielding wheat, paddy and maize seeds starting in 1964-1965 to boost agricultural output. Operation Flood, starting in 1970, organized dairy cooperatives to increase milk production, procurement, and rural incomes.
CLTS as a working approach: Experiences of Plan EthiopiaIRC
- The document discusses Plan Ethiopia's experience with introducing the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach to improve sanitation and hygiene in rural communities.
- CLTS was first introduced in Shebedino District in 2007 and saw promising results, with some villages achieving open defecation free status within months.
- The approach empowered communities to develop and implement their own sanitation solutions without relying on subsidies. It has since been scaled up to other areas managed by Plan Ethiopia.
PHAST CIC is a social enterprise consultancy established by former NHS public health executives. Mike helped establish PHAST's organizational framework and governance structures so it could begin operating immediately to serve NHS clients. He ensured suitable banking, legal, and accounting partners were identified. The establishment deliverables were completed within a few months. Mike then assumed the role of Company Secretary to help solidly establish PHAST as a niche public health consulting organization. Mike provided strategic guidance and commercial consultancy that helped PHAST secure major contracts and create efficient business systems to adapt to changing healthcare needs.
This report is a summary and consolidation of the workshops content and process. The report also covers the strategic advice/road map for capacity building for Syrian teachers and other personnel in terms of the quality inclusive education in the camps.
‘Quality education’ is education that is available, accessible, and acceptable and adaptable.
The single most important factor in assuring the quality of learning is the regular availability of well-trained, motivated teachers who know the content of their courses and engage their classes with learner –focused teaching methodologies.
The report has seven sections: A. Introduction, B. Scope of Work, C. Methodology, D. Reflections from Working Groups, E. Findings & Suggestions, F. What’s Next & Evaluation of Workshop(s), G. What’s the Next Strategy? - Road Map for Next Steps.
This document summarizes a presentation about Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS). It describes how CLTS originated in Bangladesh in 1999-2000 and has since spread to over 40 countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. CLTS is a community-led approach to achieving total sanitation that does not rely on subsidies or top-down directives. It uses participatory methods like community mapping to build awareness of open defecation's negative impacts and empower communities to end the practice collectively. The document outlines challenges to scaling up and sustaining CLTS, including changing mindsets, ensuring facilitator training, and navigating political and institutional barriers.
The document provides an overview of the Sphere Project, which establishes minimum standards for humanitarian response. It describes the Sphere handbook's structure, including the Humanitarian Charter, standards common to all sectors, and technical chapters with minimum standards, key indicators, and guidance notes. The standards are based on extensive consultation and aim to put principles and values into action. The handbook is needed due to increasing humanitarian crises and actors, and to ensure quality and accountability.
Children spend a lot of time in school. We can help ensure
that while they’re there, they can safely drink water,
wash their hands, and have comfortable, clean sanitation
facilities. Children who learn good habits at school take
the knowledge home, so our investments have an impact
on the broader community. Learn how your club can get
involved in WASH-in-Schools initiatives by working
with schools, governments, NGOs, and partner clubs, and
hear suggestions for improving community engagement.
Moderator: Val Johnson, Water and Sanitation Rotarian
Action Group Board Member, Rotary Club of New
Brighton/Mounds View, Minnesota, USA
An overview of Rotary India WinS (WASH in Schools) program in India. Rotary in India is undertaking WASH program in 10000 government schools. We must know that fulfilling every child's right to water, sanitation and hygiene education remains a major challenge in India. Although our Union and State governments have made great strides over the years towards safeguarding the well being of children, there are millions of children in our country who have no access to drinking water, sanitation facilities and hygiene education. The sustainable WinS (WASH in Schools) program launched by Rotary with the support of UNICEF is intended to improve health, foster learning and enable children to participate as agents of change for their siblings, their parents and the community at large. Rotary in India will have a role in making sure that every child receives the benefits of WASH in Schools.
This document summarizes International Accounting Standard 8 on accounting policies, changes in estimates, and errors. Key points include:
- IAS 8 provides guidance on selecting and applying accounting policies, and accounting for changes in policies, estimates, and prior period errors.
- It defines terms like accounting policies, changes in estimates, materiality, prior period errors, and retrospective application.
- IAS 8 requires accounting policies to be selected from IFRSs and applied consistently, unless impracticable. It outlines sources to consider if no IFRS applies.
- Changes in accounting policies and corrections of errors require retrospective treatment, unless impracticable. Estimates are recognized prospectively.
-
Este documento ofrece ejemplos de diferentes tipos de información que pueden incluirse, como cartas, bosquejos, detalles sobre eventos y más. Proporciona una lista de cuatro puntos con ideas sobre lo que la información podría abarcar.
Luciano habla sobre su mascota preferida, un perro negro y marrón de tamaño mediano que llegó a su casa un día de verano. El perro tiene el pelaje suave y le gusta jugar durante el día y salir de noche. Siempre viene cuando Luciano lo llama para estar o jugar con él. Luciano describe a su mascota como alegre y buena.
ESCRITO ESTA EN ACCIÓN. DIOS BENDICE A JACOB Y LAS PRUEBAS DE JACOB EN SUS ÚL...CPV
SE TRATA DE UN TRIPTICO QUE TRATA SOBRE LA OCASIÓN CUANDO JACOB RECIBE LA BENDICIÓN DE DIOS Y LAS PRUEBAS O ADVERSIDADES QUE SUFRIÓ EN LOS ÚLTIMOS DÍAS DE SU VIDA. SE ENCUENTRA EN GÉNESIS 35:1-29. ADEMAS HAY UN CRUCIGRAMA BÍBLICO SOBRE LA MISMA LECCIÓN, UNA ANÉCDOTA CRISTIANA, ALGUNOS PENSAMIENTOS SABIOS Y UN VERSÍCULO POR MEMORIZAR.
The document discusses urinary tract infections (UTIs), including:
- Causes of UTIs are usually bacteria like E. coli entering the urethra and multiplying in the bladder or kidneys.
- Symptoms include frequent urination, painful burning during urination, and sometimes fever with kidney infections.
- Treatment involves antibiotics chosen based on urine tests identifying the bacteria and sensitivity tests to select the most effective drug.
This document provides a guide for buying a lift (elevator) in India. It discusses various factors to consider such as the purpose and duty of the lift which determines the appropriate model. Duty depends on how many times per hour the lift is used, with private homes being light duty under 10 starts per hour, and office buildings being heavy duty under 80 starts per hour. This affects the price as components need different ratings for heavy versus light duty. The document warns about fly-by-night operators taking advantage of high demand, and advises not being swayed by fancy websites which can be cheap to create but indicate poor infrastructure for the elevator industry.
Ekaterina Yarmolyuk is a 27-year-old female from Ryazan, Russia seeking a position as a Finance Trainee. She has a degree in Economics from the State University - Higher School of Economics in Moscow. She is fluent in Russian and English with basic knowledge of Spanish. Her work experience includes over 7 years in management roles involving tasks like negotiating, advising customers, managing documentation and reporting, and database administration. She has strong computer skills including various Microsoft Office programs.
This document discusses four types of sentences: declarative sentences, imperative sentences, interrogative sentences, and exclamatory sentences. It also provides examples of different types of clauses and sentences, including simple sentences with independent clauses, complex sentences with dependent clauses, and compound sentences with multiple independent clauses. The examples are attributed to authors Maya Angelou, Vincent Van Gogh, and Ralph Waldo Emerson.
Music brings us joy and enriches our emotional lives. If our collection of good music was suddenly lost, it would be upsetting. However, deleted or lost music from an iPhone is not truly gone, as it can be recovered with the right data recovery software. This document provides instructions for using such software to select the file type and location to scan, preview recoverable files, and then recover deleted music from an iPhone.
The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision remanding the case of ejectment to the regional trial court. It found that the proper action was accion publiciana instead of unlawful detainer, as the respondent's possession of the land portion in question had lasted more than one year. While the petitioner filed the complaint within one year of demanding possession, the respondent had been in possession since 1985, or for over 15 years prior to the complaint. As such, the case involved determining possession rights over a period longer than one year, making it a case for the regional trial court under accion publiciana instead of the municipal court under unlawful detainer.
ESCRITO ESTA EN ACCIÓN. JOSE, VENDIDO POR SUS HERMANOS..GÉNESIS 37:12-36. (GN...CPV
SE TRATA DE UN TRIPTICO QUE TRATA SOBRE JOSE,Y SUS HERMANOS LO VENDEN A LOS MADIANITAS. SE ENCUENTRA EN GÉNESIS 37:12-36. ADEMAS HAY UN CRUCIGRAMA BÍBLICO SOBRE LA MISMA LECCIÓN, UNA ANÉCDOTA CRISTIANA, ALGUNOS PENSAMIENTOS SABIOS Y UN VERSÍCULO POR MEMORIZAR.
The document reports on the pilot phase of the Ecological Organic Agriculture Initiative in Nigeria in 2012. The initiative had six pillars: research, training and extension; information and communication; value chain and market development; networking and partnerships; supportive policies and programs; and institutional capacity development. The pilot phase in Nigeria strengthened research, training and extension activities in ecological organic agriculture; improved communication of organic methodologies; created market access and value addition for organic products; and improved networking among stakeholders. The initiative aimed to contribute to food security and livelihoods through organic agriculture.
The document provides a progress report on the Cassava Weed Management Project in Nigeria in 2014. Some key accomplishments include:
1) Agronomic trials were conducted in 8 sites across Nigeria to test different weed management techniques including tillage, cropping systems, fertilizer application, and cassava densities. Weed biomass and maize yield data was collected.
2) Three brush cutters and eight motorized rotary weeders were procured and modified for use in Nigeria. Preliminary field tests showed they can weed faster than hand hoes.
3) A prioritized list of major cassava weeds in Nigeria was produced based on a literature review to guide site selection for herbicide trials.
The study visit focused on organic agriculture in Kenya and Uganda. Key findings included:
- Organic agriculture can intensify production for smallholder farmers but successes are poorly documented.
- National organic policies and research support are lacking in most countries visited.
- Regional standards and certification systems need strengthening to improve market access.
- Local consumer awareness and markets are underdeveloped despite growing farmer adoption.
- Processing technologies need improving to add value and reduce post-harvest losses.
The participants recommended raising awareness of organic agriculture among policymakers, strengthening networks and research, developing regional standards, and investing in appropriate processing technologies.
The document discusses the structure and progress of the Ecological Organic Agriculture Initiative in Africa. It provides:
1) An overview of the initiative's goal, vision, mission and strategic areas to promote ecologically sound agriculture practices across Africa.
2) Details on the structure of the initiative including the Continental Steering Committee established to guide implementation and composed of representatives from various stakeholders.
3) An update on achievements of the Continental Steering Committee so far, which include supporting regional organic conferences, training programs, and providing guidance to regional structures to further the initiative.
Integrating local and scientific knowledge: an opportunity for addressing prodDr. Joshua Zake
This publication presents lessons and experiences of Environmental Alert and farmers towards integration of local and scientific knowledge in solving agricultural
production and natural resource management constraints. It also describes processes, steps, principles and recommendations to increase opportunities for integration of local and scientific knowledge in development initiatives in Uganda.
SRI-LMB Newsletter Vol 2. Issue 1, Year 2014Sri Lmb
This newsletter summarizes activities of the SRI-LMB Project funded by the European Union and implemented by the Asian Institute of Technology. It discusses the following:
1) Central Farmer’s Participatory Action Research programs have been established in Surin and Uttaradit provinces in Thailand to train farmers on SRI techniques through experiments comparing different rice cultivation methods.
2) National inception workshops were held in Cambodia, Lao PDR, Thailand, and Vietnam to inform stakeholders about the project and finalize country strategies and work plans.
3) A regional training of trainers event was held in Thailand to develop a common understanding of SRI principles and train project staff on participatory action research methods.
Fourth bulletin of the quarterly publication of Tropical Legumes III (TL III)...Tropical Legumes III
This is fourth bulletin of the quarterly publication of Tropical Legumes III (TL III) project, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and jointly implemented by the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in close collaboration with partners in the national agricultural research systems (NARS) of target countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. TL III aims to improve the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in drought-prone areas of the two regions through enhanced productivity and production of grain legumes.
The Bulletin of Tropical Legumes is a quarterly publication of the Tropical Legumes III (TL-III) project, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and jointly implemented by the the International Crops Research Institute in the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in close collaboration with partners in the National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS) of the target countries in sub- Saharan Africa and South Asia. TL-III aims to improve the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in drought- prone areas of the two regions through enhancing grain legumes productivity and production.
Overview of N2Africa-Ethiopia project: Achievements and future plansILRI
Poster prepared by Endalkachew Welde-Meskel and Tamiru Amanu for the Capacity Development Workshop of the CGIAR Research Program on Humidtropics, Nairobi, 29 April–2 May 2014
There are four major organizational streams devoted to agricultural extension work in India: 1) the first line agricultural system of ICAR institutes and agricultural universities, 2) the extension system of the Ministry of Agriculture and state departments of agriculture, 3) the extension system of the Ministry of Rural Development and state development departments, and 4) the work done by voluntary organizations and businesses. The document then outlines the mission and vision of ICAR and lists its objectives related to education, research, consultancy, and rural development in agriculture and allied fields.
Results and Priorities for FAO in the African RegionFAO
The document summarizes FAO's work in Africa from 2014-2015, including supporting the Malabo Declaration and achieving the 2025 Zero Hunger goal. It outlines key achievements such as recognizing countries that met MDG hunger targets and enhancing partnerships. It discusses focus areas for 2016-2017 like sustainable agricultural production, building resilience in drylands, and continued support of regional policies and implementation strategies. The regional conference is asked to recognize past results, provide guidance on priorities, and support further resource mobilization efforts.
The document discusses various first-line extension systems established by ICAR in India to transfer agricultural technologies to farmers. These include the National Demonstration program (1964), Operational Research Projects (1974), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (1974), Trainers' Training Centres (1976), Lab to Land program (1979), Technology Assessment and Refinement program (1995), National Agricultural Technology Project (1998), Agricultural Technology Information Centres (2000), and the National Agricultural Innovation Project (2006). The key goal of these programs was to bridge the gap between agricultural research and its implementation at farm level through participatory approaches.
This document provides a summary of the Africa Agriculture Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops from 2013. The report outlines the status of agriculture in 16 African countries, focusing on issues such as input availability and access, the policy environment, and access to output markets. It covers topics like agricultural productivity, land tenure, soil health, seed systems, financing, markets, the role of women, extension services, and capacity development. The report took over a year and a half to produce and involved consulting various government ministries, statistics bureaus, organizations, and institutions working in African agriculture.
This document provides a summary of the Africa Agriculture Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops from 2013. The report outlines the status of agriculture in 16 African countries, focusing on issues such as input availability and access, the policy environment, and access to output markets. It covers topics like agricultural productivity, land tenure, soil health, seed systems, financing, markets, the role of women, extension services, and capacity development. The report took over a year and a half to produce and involved consulting various government ministries, statistics bureaus, organizations, and institutions working in African agriculture.
The document summarizes key discussions and outcomes from a two-day regional review and planning workshop on the System of Rice Intensification - Lower Mekong Basin (SRI-LMB) project held in Hanoi, Vietnam. The workshop brought together representatives from governments, universities, international organizations, and farmers involved in the SRI-LMB project. Participants shared results showing SRI practices led to 66% higher yields compared to conventional methods while using 30% less energy. They discussed strategies for scaling up SRI to boost small farmer incomes, food security, and environmental sustainability in the region. Recommendations included continuing to promote SRI and conservation agriculture.
Opportunities for sub-regional collaborationFARAInfo
ASARECA is an association of 11 agricultural research institutions in Eastern and Central Africa established in 1994. It aims to enhance regional collective action in agricultural research, extension, and education to promote economic growth and reduce poverty and hunger. Key opportunities for collaboration include identifying cross-border priorities, developing joint strategies, coordinating responses to emergencies, harmonizing policies to facilitate trade, sharing knowledge and innovations, and building capacity through centers of excellence. Examples of successful collaborative projects include the development and distribution of drought-tolerant maize varieties and the increased productivity of onion and potato crops through the sharing of germplasm and best practices.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Ethiopia planning meeting report
1.
2. 2 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
ACIAR Australian Center for International Agriculture Research
ARARI Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute
ARC Agricultural Research Council, South Africa
ASARECA Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa
BARC Bako Agricultural Research Center
BNF Biological nitrogen fixation
CA Conservation agriculture
CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
DTMA Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa Project
EIAR Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research
HARC Hawassa Agricultural Research Center
ICARDA International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas
ICRISAT International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Agriculture in Africa)
IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development
IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute
IITA International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
ILRI International Livestock Research Institute
MARC Melkassa Agricultural Research Center
M&E Monitoring and evaluation
NARES National Agricultural Research and Extension System
NARI National Agricultural Research Institute
NARS National Agricultural Research Systems
NEPAD New Partnership for Africa's Development
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
OPV Open pollinated variety
PARC Pawe Agricultural Research Center
PVS Participatory variety selection
QAAFI Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation
SIMLESA Sustainable Intensification of Maize and Legume Cropping Systems for Food Security in Eastern and Southern Africa Program
TLC Total Land Care
TLII, TL-2 Tropical Legumes II Project
3. This paper summarizes the planning meeting held in Hawassa, Ethiopia, from 23-25 September 20114, for CIMMYTY’s Sustainable
Intensification of Maize-Legume Cropping Systems for Food Security in Eastern and Southern Africa (SIMLESA) Phase 2 program. The meeting
focused on streamlining project activities to meet objectives of the second phase (SIMLESA 11).
Representatives from key stakeholders attended the meeting, such as the Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR),
Queensland Alliance for Agricultural and Food Innovation (QAAFI), the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the Ethiopian
Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), private seed companies and SIMLESA scientists from Ethiopia, Kenya and Zimbabwe.
These proceedings provide a summary of the meeting presentations, participant discussions and planning for program implementation; and a
list of participants who took part in the meeting.
The first phase of the SIMLESA program ended in June this year. The second phase was launched in July. The major objective of the September
meeting was to produce country-specific operational plans for Ethiopia. This involved realigning the country’s activities to the overall SIMLESA
11 program plan.
SIMLESA, funded by the Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), was launched in 2010 to improve the livelihoods of
smallholder farming communities in Africa through productive and sustainable maize-legume systems and risk management strategies that
conserve natural resources. It is managed by CIMMYT and implemented by national agricultural research systems (NARS) partners in five target
countries of Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania. With lessons from these core countries, the program is also implemented in
spill over countries of Botswana, Rwanda, and Uganda
Key outcomes of the meeting included a renewed commitment from the Ethiopian government and program partners to the program, and an
improved understanding by the program partners of their roles and key work areas in the program. There are five objectives to the program
(provided in this summary), and several workshops and meetings are planned in the near future to progress work plans and design the
characterization, targeting, monitoring and evaluation for the program.
4. 4 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Dr Eshetu Derso, deputy crop research director of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, and guest of honor at the meeting, said
SIMLESA had improved the production and productivity of smallholder farmers through productive and sustainable maize-legume systems. He
urged the participants to endorse SIMLESA 11 approval for the sustainability of the program.
Dr Mulugeta Mekuria, program coordinator outlined the achievements of the first phase of the program and highlighted the activities of
SIMLESA 11. Dr Mekuria said the first phase had built strong working relationships with government agencies, research institutions,
smallholder farmer groups, and private sector companies to increase rural food security and smallholder incomes. The second phase of
SIMLESA, he said, would complement those achievements, especially by scaling out good agricultural practices.
He said: “As we enter into the second phase of SIMLESA, we are taking stock of the successes and challenges of the previous phase. This will
help us to plot the path for the next phase. We see this as presenting opportunities in current and future work. It will enable us to support better
regional activities, and to place SIMLESA more strategically with governments and other agricultural research partners in our geographical
areas of focus. ”
Toward the planning meeting, SIMLESA had undertaken a week long evaluation of its Conservation Agriculture -based systems in North
Western area (South Achefer, Jabitenan and Pawe), in the Western sub-humid area (Bako), in the Eastern area (Jijiga and Gursum), and in the
Central/Southern Rift Valley area (Melkassa, Meki, Adami Tulu, Hawassa, Boricha and Locakabaya).
The results of the evaluation were presented at the planning meeting. Overall, the on-farm exploratory and on-station research trials carried
out during phase 1 are demonstrating great technologies adopted by some farmers. However, the concerted effort and continued training of
government extension workers and research institutions is critical to SIMLESA’s long-term impact. More documentation of activities, success
stories and exchange visits with peer farmers would enhance farmer-to-farmer participation and information sharing.
The national coordinator, Mekonnen Sime, gave an overview of SIMLESA 1 in Ethiopia. Objective leaders and EIAR effectively analyzed and
prioritized SIMLESA 11’s specific needs in Ethiopia. Cross-cutting areas such as gender mainstreaming were also highlighted as crucial to the
success of SIMLESA 2. Objective leaders and partners also realigned program objectives to the country’s specific needs. At the end, the
meeting produced detailed draft activity plans linked to the program budget.
5. The participants introduced themselves and enabled them to know each other by name, organization and position at work. Presentations were
followed by a Question and Answer Session while other sessions had group work (practicals) and plenary discussions to identify issues and align
the planned activities with the budget.
Due to time limitations, the workshop did not outline specific recommendations. However, the national agricultural research system of Ethiopia
– through a representative made recommendations. The NARS expressed the need for SIMLESA to properly document and communicate the
results and achievements of the phase of the program.
All the participants agreed that the meeting was worthwhile as it enabled them to share and learn from each other’s experiences, and plan for
the next phase. It facilitated networking among the development practitioners Overall, it developed and enhanced their planning and review
skills. However, some of the participants felt that the meeting was too short compared to the diversity of issues that were covered.
6. 6 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Chair: Dr Mulugetta Mekuria
1.1 In his welcome speech, Daniel Ambachew, the Southern Agriculture Research Institute (SARI) crop director said as a research center his
organization appreciated the continued funding of the program by the Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). Just
as in the first phase, he hoped that the second phase of the program would deliver even better results after learning from previous experiences.
Dr Mekuria’s presentation centered on “What is Good-Difficult and Different? In SIMLESA 2 work. He gave a brief profile of the program. The
ACIAR-funded SIMLESA program launch and planning was convened to plan for the implementation of SIMLESA II in Ethiopia, together with
other partners such as CIMMYT and CIAT.
He said the SIMLESA program implementation was being implemented by CIMMYT jointly with the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research
(EIAR), and other partners, with a financial grant form ACIAR (Phase 1 -2010 to 2014) and phase 2 (2014 to 2018).
SIMLESA operates in five core countries of Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania, and spill-over countries of Botswana, Uganda,
Rwanda.
The program’s regional and international partners include ICRISAT, QAAFI, ARC, ASARECA, and MU. The second phase includes CCARDESA,
ILRI, and CIAT.
7. SIMLESA I had gathered collective experience, produced the 2012 mid- term review report, held the third and fourth annual review planning
meetings as well as a project steering committee meeting to inform the planning of SIMLESA II.
Phase 1 of the program has empowered the National Agricultural Research Stations (NARS) in making important decisions regarding the
program, build the capacity of the NARS to execute programs (programming, scientifically and financially).
As a result of its achievements, SIMLESA is being considered as a model project among government and the donor community. The4 program
has also participated in various regional and international conferences to advance its agricultural for development objectives.
Dr Mekuria said SIMLESA is being institutionalized into NARS strategies especially the adoption of SIMLESA approaches into their operational
models such as the agricultural value chain analysis, innovations platforms, gender mainstreaming and M&E institutionalization.
In SIMLESA 2 the program was banking on its successes in conservation agriculture-based cropping systems which had raised productivity
increasing technologies, NARS ownership of program work and capacity building. Challenges in implementation were highlighted as CA-based
sustainable intensification in integrating other disciplines; risk reducing innovations and research designs, scaling out and business engagement
(except maize seed), and M&E which supports management.
The overall objective of SIMLESA II is the continuation of the original 10-year vision by the year 2023: to sustainably improve maize and legume
productivity of selected maize-based farming systems in each target country by 30 percent from the 2009 average and to reduce the expected
downside yield risk by 30 percent on approximately an additional 650,000 farms in the SIMLESA countries.
SIMLESA II has the following elements:
The combination of innovations with the aim to increasing productivity and profitability, reduce downside production risks, enhance
sustainability and strengthen innovation platforms/systems.
SIMLESA II implementation period is 2014 to 2018 with the following implication: continuation with adjustment to 1st
phase (2010-13) to build
on SIMLESA-1 achievements and lessons/feedback with the aim of strengthening multi-disciplinary field teams, targeting, scaling-out; refocus
some research and capacity building and phase down on completed research.
SIMLESA 2 would be different from SIMLESA 1 and changes would include the following:
Broader technological focus with the core thrust on Conservation Agriculture (CA)-based sustainable intensification, system orientation- from
plot to farm, impact orientation-adoption, impact pathways, value chain linkages; partnership and scaling up/out and the management of
competitive and commissioned grants.
8. 8 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
There are several capacity building opportunities in SIMLESA II, such as:
Training of at least 100 professionals on CA-based sustainable intensification, provided to build and enhance capacity of national and
regional programs,
Train 50rained professionals on gender mainstreaming,
Train 25 professionals on seed systems,
Train 10 research managers,
Train 50 extension and scaling out professionals,
Opportunities to access competitive Australian PhD scholarships and ARC supported MSc. and PhD scholarships.
SIMLESA II will use lessons learned from SIMLESA I. These are the following:
Integrating value chains activities with technologies,
capacity building and local policy analysis,
Use of innovation platforms;
Consult women during project design and implementation and understand the incentives of all chain members and value chain
dynamics within the broader market and trade context.
In SIMLESA II there some new activities that would be implemented differently, such as:
Objective 1:
The objective will make use of the rich and comprehensive data set available. The objective will no longer be a socioeconomics “silo” but will be
multidisciplinary. Typologies to be used for targeting purposes will also be introduced to evaluate developed SIMLESA options. The objective
will implement the value chain analysis and market studies for farmer- market linkages and agribusiness development. In addition, objective 1
will adopt and monitor results to influence technology development and feed back to objective 2 and 3.
Objective 2:
Fine tuning of current options and new areas of research by all and not just agronomists. The program is expected to:
revisit on station and on farm exploratory trials- numbers and sites;
package options for scaling out – objectives 1, 3 and 4;
Produce case farms studies;
going from plot to farm scale; and
Facilitate CIAT and QAAFI to collaborate on country specific soil science research
9. Objective 3:
Making available more new and resilient varieties of maze and legumes. There will be no more breeding as both legumes and maize breeding
has a heavy investment by BMGF. The objective will help the program:
refine the seed road maps per country;
strengthen seed companies;
to have more emphasis on legumes by strengthening the informal seed sector and capacity building
Objective 4-
This is now a new standalone objective. It is no longer a refugee under objective 2. There is a competitive grant for scaling out with current and
new scaling out partners. The objective will strengthen and use agricultural innovative platforms (AIPs) for scaling out, and work with
agribusinesses to facilitate scaling out. Another area of focus for the objective would be measuring and documenting scaling out experiences
and lessons. At the conclusion of ACIAR funding in 2018, the program would have reached 650,000 households in the five core SIMLESA
countries and the three spillover countries.
Objective 5:
Strengthened capacity building on specific country needs. This includes:
on the job training, including online training by QAAFI;
the development and production of a gender strategy for SIMLESA II;
communications office on board from 1st
September 2014;
M and E officer under recruitment;
two QAAFI scientists based in Harare (Zimbabwe) and Addis Ababa (Ethiopia);
improved program management and governance in place for SIMLESA II ; and
strict and regular reporting by all partners.
However, the program coordinator said the road to SIMLESA success would not be smooth. Therefore, there was a great need to sustain the
achievements of SIMLESA 1. But this would be more difficult as SIMLESA 2 had fewer resources than SIMLESA 1 although more activities were
to be implemented in the new phase. SIMLESA 2 will coordinate a multi stakeholder program facing challenges in the area of limited capacity
by partners to implement new areas of research and managing competitive grants and commissioned research. In addition, the program would
be expected to get trust based data access, share policy issues and reach out to 650, 000 households.
10. 10 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Mekonnen started by giving a brief background of maize and legumes playing a critical role to the food security, access to income, and the
overall livelihoods of Ethiopian farmers. He added that maize was a strategic food security crop while legumes were an important source of
dietary protein and an income window.
But, production and productivity is low due to climate variability, declining soil fertility, and pest problems as well as poor extension system.
Most smallholder farming in Ethiopia focuses on producing staple foods for home consumption. The smallholder sector remains largely
unprofitable and is characterized by low uptake of improved inputs and technologies, poor quality control, weak links to markets, high
transport costs, and lack of access to finance and credit. To increase production, incomes, and employment opportunities, and to move from
subsistence to commercial farming, Ethiopia’s smallholder farmers need to address these issues effectively.
To achieve commercial-level production, smallholders must adapt good agricultural practices that help mitigate the effects of climate change.
Good agricultural practices, income, and climate change adaptation are inextricably linked.
The national coordinator said SIMLESA aimed at increasing farm level food security and income through integration and ensures sustainability,
productivity and profitability among farmers.
The program has the following objectives:
• Objective 1: Characterizing maize-legume production and input and output value chain systems and impact pathways, and
identify broad systemic constraints and options for field testing
• Objective 2: To test and develop productive, resilient and sustainable smallholder maize/legume cropping systems and
innovation systems for local scaling out
• Objective 3: To increase the range of maize, grain legumes and fodder/forage varieties available for smallholders through
accelerated breeding, regional testing and release, and availability of performance data.
• Objective 4: To support the development of regional and local innovation systems
• Objective 5: Capacity building and purchase of project Items
In Ethiopia, SIMLESA has two phases: the main SIMLESA-activities supported by ACIAR (since March, 2010) and SIMLESA expansion which
AusAID had been supporting since April, 2012.
The program is being implemented by the federal and regional research institutes of the country under eight research centers covering 17
districts in different maize-legume agro-ecologies. During the first phase of SIMLESA (2010-2013), the program achieved several milestones, as
follows:
11. Eighty-four communities were identified and participated in technology testing and scaling out.Three farming systems/agro-ecologies were
identified. These included semi-arid, humid and sub-humid
The program conducted a baseline survey in 15 districts (>1,500households) to generate data on demography, resources, adoption, production,
market, and risk management strategies, among others. The baseline survey report was produced and shared with relevant stakeholders.
A market survey and value chain analysis were carried out. Four functional typologies were identified (based on resource endowment).
Constraints to production were also identified. One of smallholders’ major impediments to agricultural production is a lack of access to reliable
and productive markets. Local rural markets are small, and trading in distant urban markets is not profitable because of high transportation
costs. Smallholders also face challenges in gaining access to credit, high-quality inputs, improved technology, information on good agricultural
practices, and business development services. This trend has left many small-scale producers on their own at a time when they badly need
advice on how to improve on their agricultural productivity and adapt to rapidly changing climatic conditions.
With program interventions, there was increased yield under CA in many locations except in few specific sites which need further adjustments
in terms of drainage and tied-ridging, among other technologies.
Conservation agriculture showed promising results for double cropping as it minimized production costs and resulted in more profits. For
example, the frequency of tillage was reduced from 4-6 to 2-0. As a result CA technologies were being expanded and adopted by host and
neighboring farmers.
An evaluation of different conservation tillage techniques for smallholder farmers was done where the ripper was recommended for scaling out.
Also, CA attracted the interest of farmers and different partners.
To maximize impact, different trainings and technical assistance were organized for farmers, experts and researchers on CA and related
technologies. Farmers’ preferred crop and forage varieties were identified.
Different classes of seeds of maize, legumes and forages were produced by research centers and other partners. The program also
implemented different capacity building trainings organized by partner institutions (ARC, UQ, ASARECA).
To mainstream gender into development activities, gender case studies were conducted through the support of ASARECA. The EIAR Gender
unit also organized a training for SIMLESA researchers and partners where 25 participants (2 female) attended the training sessions. The
sustainable intensification initiatives led to agricultural diversification, especially in the SNNP region.
On communications and dissemination, the SIMLESA program promoted its project activities through contributing articles in journals,
produced workshop proceedings, bulletins, papers on different for a, produced newsletters ( (EIAR, CIMMYT), banners, T-shirts and hats as
well as leaflets and flyers. Key SIMLESA messages were also broadcast on radio and television in various languages) since 2011.
12. 12 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
The program coordinator highlighted a number of challenges which the program faced. This included effects of climate change, a high rate of
staff turnover and limited capacity on staff to implement some of the program initiatives.
There were also problems of residue management and free grazing since it was difficult to control animals, especially during the off-farming
season. In addition, there were challenges and limitations in trial site selection. The voracious armyworm also caused havoc as it destroyed
crops. In some cases, there were conflicting agricultural practices as the national extension package did not, as yet, promote conservation
agriculture.
On farm trials management in weeding, residue management (pay for labor for on farm trials?) also paused challenges as there were no
resources to pay for labor costs. There was a general lack of interest by research centers to multiply seeds, especially legumes and forages. The
shortage of chemicals and seeds added to the list of challenges.
To achieve maximum impact in SIMLESA 2, the program is expected to strengthen partnerships for effective scaling out. There was a need to
implement a climate outlook based advisory system for enhanced mitigation of climate variability and change.
The program would also need to eexamine soil fertility enhancement, nutrient management and dynamics, and carbon sequestration from CA
plots. Efforts would also be initiated to monitor beneficial soil macro and microbial processes under CA. The program would study the
possibilities of using CA implements for effective scaling out, and whether
CA would also be ideal for other crops. Other activities are:
• To conduct a study on water drainage/tied ridging, depending on soil type
• Intensify formal and informal seed production of legumes and forages
• Introduce and manage a proposal based financing mechanism of project activities
13. Dr Eshetu Derso, deputy crop research director of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, and guest of honor at the meeting, first
welcomed the meeting participants warmly. He said it was an opportune time to initiate the second phase of SIMLESA and renew contacts and
discuss problems of mutual interest with delegates from other Eastern and Southern African countries and various institutions from Ethiopia.
He noted that the agenda of the meeting covered a wide range of interesting issues relating to the overall SIMLESA Phase 1 in Ethiopia,
SIMLESA Phase 1 to 2 transition/variation; objectives and expected deliverables and progress presentations by CIMMYT objective coordinators.
Dr Derso noted that it would appear as if the world was aware of the tremendous effort made, and the large investment in funds and scientific
efforts by a number of fast developing countries, like Ethiopia, in ensuring food self-sufficiency and eventually agricultural transformation. He
wished them success in their noble efforts to develop their land and water resources, and increase agricultural production and productivity. He
added that the assistance rendered from developed nations in various forms to these countries encouraged agricultural transformation and was
important enough to be noticed and acknowledged.
He said the expected outcomes of the three-day meeting would be the production of detailed action plans and activities by the relevant
implementing and partner institutions, as well as sharing roles and responsibilities among the partners.
CIMMYT is partnering EIAR through SIMLESA. The second phase of SIMLESA, he said, would strengthen the existing research activities in the
country. Dr Derso added that SIMLESA had improved the production and productivity of smallholder farmers through productive and
sustainable maize-legume systems. He urged the participants to endorse SIMLESA 11 approval for the sustainability of the program.
SIMLESA undertook a week long assessment (15 – 22 September) of its conservation agriculture (CA)-based on station research and on-farm
activities in Ethiopia.
The SIMLESA project has been implemented since 2010 in partnership with the Ethiopian federal and regional research institute with eight
research centers, covering 17 districts in different agro-ecological environments.
14. 14 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
The assessment was in preparation of scaling out recommendations for the second phase of SIMLESA (2014-2018). Socio-economists (Paswel
Marenya, Moti Jaleta and Adam Bekele), agronomists (Hae Koo Kim, Stuart Irvine-Brown, Joe Eyre) and breeders (Dagne Wegary, Alemeshet
Lemma) from CIMMYT, the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research and the Queensland Alliance for Agricultural and Food Innovation
(QAAFI), joined and assessed together the different maize-legume and forage/fodder production systems in the North Western area (South
Achefer, Jabitenan and Pawe), in the Western sub-humid area (Bako), in the Eastern area (Jijiga and Gursum), and in the Central/Southern Rift
Valley area (Melkassa, Meki, Adami Tulu, Hawassa, Boricha and Locakabaya).
Overall, the on-farm exploratory and on-station research trials carried out during phase 1 are demonstrating great technologies adopted by
some farmers. However, the concerted effort and continued training of government extension workers and research institutions is critical to
SIMLESA’s long-term impact. More documentation of activities, success stories and exchanges visits with peer farmers would enhance farmer-
to-farmer participation and information sharing.
Although this was not a fully - fledged evaluation, the scientists monitored the progress across the different locations.
On-farm exploratory trials had been going on for three to four farming seasons, with the establishment of CA technology rated as “robust” in
many agroecologies. In locations where crop-livestock competition is high, the new forage/fodder varieties should provide more solutions for
scaling-out CA technologies. At Pawe, scaling out farmers were excited about intercropping maize and soy bean under minimum tillage as they
identified huge reduction of striga infestation. At Bako, about 450 farmers in five districts are participating in pre-scaling up of crop rotation and
intercropping in maize and haricot bean in addition to maize and soy bean intercropping and rotation.
In some locations, the implementation of CA activities as a complete package has been challenging with issues related to water logging,
termites infestation and weed control. In particular, researchers and extension agents expressed the need to revise the CA package to provide
better means to improve weed control and residue management.
Even in relatively remote areas such as Pawe and Jijiga, the evaluation team observed young, capable and committed researchers with an
established infrastructure. They also noted that the farmers were committed research partners, with researchers adapting technologies to
farmers’ preferred varieties and techniques. Also, the evaluation team recommended the local production of different maize, legume and
forage seeds to be available for scaling-out partners during the next phase.
In the Southern Rift Valley, there was clear evidence of SIMLESA technology at work: intercropping of maize a-and pigeon pea or new crops for
forage under minimum tillage. Farmers’ technologies also featured relay cropped haricot bean and some level of residue retention, and lay
pasture rotation.
In the next phase, smallholders should learn more to look at farming as - a - family business benefiting from higher productivity and better food
security. Leading toward the planning meeting of SIMLESA-2 in Ethiopia at the end of September, the whole team highlighted that the
development of CA-based maize-legume cropping systems is a highly relevant intervention to reduce vulnerability and food insecurity.
15. Reminder of objective log frames: Objective Leaders
Marenya said objective 1 had five outputs and 16 activities which were to be achieved in 15 quarters.
He outlined the outputs, as follows:
Refined understanding of CA-based intensification and feed options in selected farming systems
Understanding maize, legume and fodder/forage value chains, focusing on institutional/agribusiness constraints and opportunities,
costs and pricing patterns (gender specific)
Understanding farm risks (perception, attitude, exposure, sensitivity, interactions) and management responses/-innovations under
different biophysical, socioeconomic and institutional settings.
Functional farm-household typologies matched to CA-based intensification options
Identified and refined recommendation domains and adoption and impact pathways for 15 maize-legume-forage/fodder production
systems
In SIMLESA 2, the focus would be on impact pathways to demonstrate milestones in agricultural research and development. Another focus
would be on adoption pathways and feedback mechanisms on participatory farmer research extension and the development of the
agribusiness model. This would pave way for modalities for diffusion of projects and provide opportunities for scaling up. The program would
also work with agribusiness focusing on public investments as a way of supporting technology adoption among partners.
The program will use a business model approach to modernize market linkages fora value chains. Communication and information
dissemination came out strongly as an approach that would enable the program to achieve greater impact, and influence relevant stakeholders
at various stages of the agriculture and research process in Ethiopia. In this regard, communication materials should be simple and user-
friendly.
16. 16 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Nyagumbo asked the participants on what they perceived as changing in objective 2 (From SIMLESA 1 to SIMLESA 2).
He added that the program was planning on ways to build on Phase 1 achievements to support Phase 2 research objectives.
Nyagumbo made comparisons of the two phases, as:
PHASE 1 PHASE 2
To test and develop productive, resilient and
sustainable smallholder maize-legume cropping
systems and innovation systems for local scaling
out
To test and adapt productive, CA-based
intensification options for sustainable smallholder
maize-legume production systems
The innovation systems and local scaling out component was shifted to objective 4.
In phase 1, objective 2 had the following outputs:
1. Options for systems intensification
2. Develop functional local innovation systems
3. Evaluations of exploratory trials and characterization
4. Adjustments to the maize-legume systems
5. CA systems incorporated into farmers own fields
6. Farmer learning facilitated through exchange/study visits
Objective 1 strategy focused on a number of activities, including farmer consultations and agreement on treatments; farmer field days; on –
station trials and community awareness of agricultural interventions.
17. The following were the key issues emerging from the implementation of the first phase:
• Difficulties experienced in implementing all three principles: components, stepwise adoption.
• Labor savings from CA were generally the key benefit especially in herbicide assisted systems.
• Yield benefits were the most apparent from rotation systems.
• Yield increases were not apparent in some situations especially waterlogged soils.
• There were diseases in some maize varieties and environments under CA.
• No significant improvement in soil properties in the short term (currently, 3-4 years).
• Advantages of CA in soil moisture improvement was established
• Residue availability is one of the main concerns in mixed crop-livestock farming systems and termite prone environments.
• Weeding: labor cost, Nitrogen fertilizer availability, water conservation, herbicides, and farm mechanization challenges.
Phase 2, has, therefore, the following outputs:
Annually evaluate 150 on-farm trials of sequenced and refined CA-based intensification options for different types of farms across 15
maize-legume-forage/fodder production systems
Understanding productivity and soil health dynamics of CA based intensification practices
Lessons from CA-based intensification experiments shared and linked to targeting strategies
The future of objective 2 is to address variety issues (intercropping, diseases, Nitrogen stress tolerance) through testing released materials e.g
Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) project. The program will develop alternative soil cover options and promote crop-livestock
interactions as well as carefully design farm scale studies (2.1.3).
There is also a need to strengthen the science outputs in phase 2. Partnerships with those organizations with a comparative advantage for
quality enhancement would also be established. The program will develop strategies to work with the other SIMLESA objectives to achieve
maximum results. Above, all the objective deliverables would also need to be aligned with the budget.
What good activities were carried out during SIMLESA 1?
created ground for CA concepts for practices
supported scientific data generation and analysis
capacity building opportunities
better organized data collection (after 2
nd
year)
flexibility for improvement of project outcomes (need for better definition of outcomes?)
18. 18 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
preliminary recommendations from success stories
encouraging documents and information for future efforts
increased adoption of legume varieties
However, the objective had its fair share of challenges, such as:
on-farm/on-station trials not site and context dependent
The extension system and mindset of people needed to be changed to accept CA
lack of site and socioeconomic specific recommendations that could convince policy change
reporting without well documented background information
insufficient incentive/credit for documentation and reporting
insect, pest and disease damage (integrated pest management strategy needed?)
lack of communication products for reporting results for wider use
working with the extension staff due to staff turnover and discontinuity (this challenge extends to research, NGOs and other partners)
NARS overburdened with many activities
poor early establishment of CA plots (requirement of breeding under CA?)
Wegary said objective three had the following focus: Increase range of maize, legume and fodder/forage varieties available for smallholders
through accelerated breeding, regional testing and release and provision of quality seed.
The main activities were:
Short-listing new and best-bet maize, legume and forage varieties with potential adaptation to the conditions and farmer’s needs in
targeted maize-legume systems
Varieties mostly from ongoing breeding programs such as DTMA, TL-II
Evaluation of identified varieties in PVS and Mother-Baby Trials in target communities
Production and supply of different classes of maize and legume seeds of selected varieties
19. Accelerated breeding
Regional nurseries composed of best-bet maize and legume varieties
Maize, inbred lines characterized per se and in testcrosses for priority traits (intercropping compatibility drought, N stress, pests,
diseases)
G x E analysis and modeling in scaling out best varieties to promote into similar growing environments within and across countries
Multilocation leading to:
Availability of performance data
DUS and VCU testing of selected maize OPVs and hybrids
Seed production characteristics of elite maize hybrids and OPVs established
Achievements were listed as follows:
20. 20 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Graph 1: Number of varieties evaluated in PVS trials during 2010-2013
Graph 2:Number of PVS trials conducted during 2010-2013
What is New in SIMLESA-II for Objective 3:
• Linkage with objective 2 to identify varieties suitable for CA based systems
• Introduction of legume/fodder species in targeted farming systems
• Identify key seed systems bottlenecks (strong linkage with obj. 1 & 4)
• More focus on scaling-out and seed supply
• Small grants for SMEs and CBOs for seed production
SIMLESA-II Objective 3: Implementation Plan
Output 3.1 Stress tolerant maize varieties, higher yielding legume varieties and fodder/forage varieties available to farmers in the selected
farming systems
21. Activity 3.1,2: Potential legume species and varieties for the target environment in the program analyzed with TL11 partners annually.
Activity3.1.3: Identify and refine best forage/fodder species and variety suited for target AEZ for use in maize-legumes-forage production
system.
Activity 3.1.4: Increase farmer access to promising but underinvested material through seed increase at relevant stage of seed production
pipeline.
Activity 3.1.5: Identify, tackle and refine seed availability bottlenecks of improved maize, legume/forage varieties (from sister projects such as
DTMA, TL-11), including seed systems and agribusiness support and improved seed distribution road maps in each of the five countries.
Wegary listed the challenges facing the objective as follows: 3
Stimulating seed companies to actively produce and promote SIMLESA-identified varieties in the target geographies
Standards in varietal promotion and field demos (management, plot size, site selection)
Feedback loops and linkages (esp. with Objective 2) for selection and use of right varieties for seed scale-up and demonstrations under
CA.
High staff turnover and limited capacity
22. 22 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Objective 4 Team is concerned with the following issues in SIMLESA:
1 Policy Options, organizational Models
2 Scaling multi-stakeholder interaction mechanization
3 Scaling CA-based intensification options
4 Knowledge sharing
Objective 4 will prioritize the following:
Build on SIMLESA 1- Lessons on AIP for the improvement of phase 2 and one of the strategies is to identify one national leadership per
country to champion objective 4 activities.
Prioritize and integration of several innovations as developed by SIMLESA activities.
Aligning approaches to take into consideration gender and youth. It has been observed in SIMLESA that 40 percent of the adopters are
women hence the need for such consideration as most technologies are not gender sensitive.
There are gains and lessons that have been learned from SIMLESA 1, such as facilitation of PVA, seed bulking, on-farm CA-based
technology testing that are important and should be included in phase 2 of SIMLESA. Scaling out strategies need to be intensified as
well as looking at the sustainability of the interventions and technologies being introduced.
23. Mashango outlined the capacity building program as follows:
1. Training of at least 20 professionals on CA-based sustainable intensification, provided to build and enhance capacity of national and
regional programs
2. 10 Trained professionals on Gender mainstreaming
3. Trained professionals on seed systems
4. Trained research managers
5. Trained extension and scaling out professionals
6. Competitive Australian PhD scholarships
7. ARC supported MSc and PhD scholarships
On CA-based sustainable intensification, Mashango said the following trainings were planned: 3
CA based intensification in smallholder agriculture
Farm and household typologies,
Recommendation domains (including GIS),
Biomass mgmt. including fodder/forage,
Soil quality,
Value chains,
Adoption, risk and impact analysis,
24. 24 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Emerging topics, (supported by on site/on the job training.
On-line training courses
Soil and weather monitoring
Communication Training
• On training on gender mainstreaming, Mashango said at least 10 people would be trained on gender mainstreaming. However, he said
thetraining on gender mainstreaming would focus on on site and on the job training.
Other trainings were listed as:
Training on seed systems-Seed producers training courses
Research Management training-NARES management training on ‘soft skills’, leadership and team building, M&E, administration and
prioritization.
Extension and scaling out training-Annual extension capacity building based on country-specific training needs and short courses
These are the plans on Monitoring and Evaluation issues:
CIMMYT will recruit M&E specialist to effectively monitor program activities
Performance Monitoring Plan (PMP) developed by ASARECA will be modified, updated
M&E focal person will be capacitated as part of enhancing data quality management and M&E system within SIMLESA
PMP to be updated regularly
On the budget for Ethiopia, Mashango told the participants that there had been a budget reduction and that the budget would mainly be used
for operations and for the July 2014 to June 2018 no additional funds would be availed. Countries should concentrate on activities relevant to
them.
The main budget lines were outlined as follows:
Operational Budget
-Research operating expenses
-Total travel (travel + subsistence)
-Infrastructure cost
-Capital asset/asset usage (does not include vehicles)
ii. Coordination and oversight
25. Budget Allocation per Objective-Ethiopia
Objective 1 - 20% = AU$ 118,079.20
Objective 2 - 30% =AU$ 177,118.80
Objective 3 - 15%=AU$ 88,559.40
Objective 4 - 20% =AU$ 118,079.20
Objective 5 – 15%=AU$ 88,559.40
Total =AU$ 590,396.00
Questions/Observations/Comments:
The participants observed that it was a good idea to include exchange visits at the local level. Regarding exchange visits, it was observed that
the Objective 4 reminder on the logframe was silent on this aspect of the work. George Mburathi, the ACIAR consultant, was keen to know
whether research stations could be used as fora a for farmer-to-farmer extension (for example during field days). The participants also enquired
whether SIMLESA 2 would also focus on soil health as it related to CA. Another question was whether SIMLESA 2 would work on postharvest
handling and/losses. Also, how are training grants going to be shared among students.
On research stations being used as for a for framer extension, the meeting heard that this was possible. SIMLESA 2 would also focus on soil
health. This work would be spearheaded by CIAT.
SIMLESA 2 will work on postharvest handling and losses through farm mechanization approaches, such as the construction of metal silos and
on Integrated Pest Management (IPM).
Regarding Innovation Platforms, issues emerging were that there was a need to provide a budget to research centers for capacity building in
the area of innovation platforms. On trainings, SIMLESA would continue working with the Agricultural Research Council of South Africa to
streamline the various trainings. These would utilize competitive grants. Spillover countries would continue benefiting on exchange visits as
there were funds still available from the previous phase ($50,000). Howeve, South Sudan will no longer be part of plans because of the political
instability in that country.
2. Parallel sessions/Detailed activity plans: Presented by Hae Koo Kim
Participants broke into groups by objectives and worked on detailed work plans aligned to the budget. They were expected to report back in
plenary.
26. 26 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Presented by Frederick Baudron, CIMMYT
Is a technology that excludes livestock likely to be adopted in Ethiopia? The presenter outlined the advantages of forage systems to agricultural
research and development.
Discussions/observations/comments
Are figures on postharvest losses available? Can smallholder farmers be involved in serious forage work?
The response to postharvest losses/issues was that this is a very critical intervention and should be implemented and sustained. The initial work
is to evaluate this aspect of the work and make recommendations.
Forage for smallholders should also be taken more critical. This includes storage; ratio formulation as well as access to markets for forage.
There is need to invest in forage. The system also needs to be improved a bit as currently there are challenges in grazing, labor and
competition.
Presentation: N2Africa
N2Africa-Ethiopia, Highlights:
Led by Wageningen University; main partners IITA and ILRI; many national partners
Originally eight countries in 2009
N2Africa Phase II focus on five core countries Ghana Nigeria Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania – Bridging to phase II
Main goal: increasing inputs from N
2
-fixation
IInnccrreeaassee tthhee aarreeaa ooff llaanndd
ccrrooppppeedd wwiitthh lleegguummeess
Increase legume productivity (agronomy, P-fertilizer)
27. SSeelleecctt bbeetttteerr lleegguummee vvaarriieettiieess
Select better rhizobium strains
and inoculate
LLiinnkk ttoo mmaarrkkeettss aanndd nneeww eenntteerrpprriisseess ttoo iinnccrreeaassee ddeemmaanndd ffoorr lleegguummeess
N2Africa – target regions and legumes
West Africa: Cowpea, groundnut, soybean
EEaasstt aanndd CCeennttrraall AAffrriiccaa: CCoommmmoonn bbeeaann, ssooyybbeeaann, CChhiicckkppeeaa,, FFaabbaa bbeeaann,, groundnut,
Southern Africa: Common bean, groundnut, soy bean
N2Africa is a development to research project:
Dissemination and Development are the core
Monitoring & evaluation provides the learning
Research analyses
and feeds back
Possibilities
- Reach more small-holder farmers, Legumes have production and conservation roles in the system (inoculation technology brings
more benefits)
- Capacity building/training - Knowledge sharing, inoculation technology
- Activities on feed values of legume residues (fodder/forage species-N2Africa (ILRI)/SIMLESA II
- N2Africa also promotes PPP, widening networking to benefit smallholders.
Discussions/observations/comments
On the market, how readily available are inoculants and how affordable are they?
Ethiopia has sufficient strains for the technology to go ahead. However, they are difficulties in the delivery systems as cost are still high and
uncoordinated. Ways should be found for industries to reach smallholder farmers. But the intervention is economically viable. However, small
business should start small.
28. 28 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Mainstreaming gender in SIMLESA 2: Presented by Vongai Kandiwa, CIMMYT Gender Specialist
In Eastern and Southern Africa where CIMMYT’s Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Cropping Systems for Food Security in Eastern
and Southern Africa (SIMLESA) program works, women hold the key to improving the quality of life and increasing the food security of rural
families. While men may have greater access to land, credit, and market networks, women have the potential to be the drivers of agricultural
productivity.
SIMLESA strives to provide men, women and youth with equitable access to inputs, credit, markets, and training opportunities. We integrate
gender sensitivity into all program activities, facilitate people’s access to basic services, and continually evaluate results to maximize our impact
on both men and women.
As part of our agricultural research and development work, SIMLESA’s commitment to integrating gender strives to bring time- and labor-
saving technologies to women farmers in the region, for example. That’s why SIMLESA, a program that aims to increase food security and
incomes for smallholder farmers in five core countries in Eastern and Southern Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, and Tanzania) is
ensuring women are among those receiving the technical assistance that can help them reach their full potential in the agriculture sector.
As SIMLESA begins its second phase, with all the excitement and energy, it is good to take stock of where we are on fostering gender equality
and where we go from here. After all, our funding partners, ACIAR, the CGIAR system, CIMMYT, and national governments in all SIMLESA
countries are committed to social inclusion broadly, and to gender equity in particular. Specifically, these institutions’ gender policy positions
challenge us to be vigilant about inclusiveness.
Do our approaches reach all individuals in the communities we serve? In what ways may certain subgroups, such as women or men, be
constrained in accessing and adopting improved technologies? What can we do differently to understand the various social contexts and
develop ways to address them? If we pay attention to gender, what difference will it make in terms of ensuring food and income security and
natural resource conservation?
In SIMLESA II, we aim to consolidate the gains made during SIMLESA I. Through the Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in
Eastern and Southern Africa (ASARECA)’s leadership, SIMLESA I strengthened the capacity of over 1, 000 individuals by providing gender-
sensitive training at times and places that were convenient for men and women to ensure they received equal access to the skills and
knowledge needed to succeed in agriculture.
Additionally, ASARECA documented in-depth case studies that improved our understanding of best practices for gender analysis and
development practice. SIMLESA II is poised to build upon this solid foundation and effectively integrate gender.
29. We are happy to report on four key pathways to integrate gender into agricultural value chains and ensure all household members benefit from
expanded economic opportunities:
a strong team of gender experts
a gender strategy
an gender Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E ) framework
solid commitment from the project leadership and team
First, because SIMLESA operates in five core African countries, it is essential to have a strong coordination unit that helps to streamline and to
an extent, standardize activities and tracking of progress. SIMLESA II engaged CIMMYT’s gender specialist, Vongai Kandiwa, to lead and
coordinate the integration of gender. Since joining the SIMLESA family in July 2014 and with the help and input from country coordinators,
Vongai identified a strong team of country gender focal persons: Dr. Rehima Mussema (Ethiopia); Charles Nkonge (Kenya); Kenneth Chaula
(Malawi); Maria Luz (Mozambique); and Vidah Mahava (Tanzania). This team will ensure that gender is taken into account during priority
setting fora, such as country planning and coordination meetings, provide technical backstopping in-country and provide leadership on
monitoring and evaluation of gender equality outcomes and processes.
Second, SIMLESA produced and shared widely with SIMLESA team a draft gender strategy for the program. The strategy provides clear
guidelines on where gender is relevant, delineates where action is feasible, what specifically needs to be done, by whom, at what level, at what
cost, and how to track progress? The strategy is built upon three key principles:
Understanding – we seek to critically examine and understand how, and in what contexts gender impacts in conservation agriculture (CA-based)
maize-legume systems especially for adoption and scaling out.
Opportunity – women are sometimes unable to influence the decisions that directly affect farm yields and household income. SIMLESA
promotes agriculture as a family business, giving women the ability and autonomy to make decisions. We train women in leadership skills,
negotiation, and group formation. We also endeavor to foster equal opportunities for men, women and youth to access information, markets,
participate in demonstrations, trials and field days, receive training and provide leadership in local agricultural innovation platforms.
Learning – we strive for continued learning on gender through research and practice. Overall, in SIMLESA II, we hope to minimize the chances
of creating gender gaps in access to improved technologies and opportunities, bridge gender gaps where they exist and avoid creating new
ones. The strategy was presented and discussed at the Malawi and Mozambique Planning meetings in August this year. It was also presented
again at the Ethiopia, Kenya, and Tanzania planning meetings before being finalized by end of November.
30. 30 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Third, the SIMLESA gender strategy outlines clear and measurable monitoring and evaluation (M&E) indicators which will be integrated into
the overall SIMLESA M and E framework. Most importantly, we do not only track standard quantitative indicators, but also qualitative ones
such as approaches and processes that are effective in ensuring equal participation and benefits sharing between men and women in
communities where we work. The idea is to share ideas, learn from one another, and constantly improve on our strategies.
Looking ahead, what will it take to successfully integrate gender? Success on gender in SIMLESA will not entirely depend on what individual
SIMLESA gender experts do. Rather, it is our collective commitments, responsibilities and efforts that matter. After all, many of the gender
relevant activities will be led and carried out by other SIMLESA team members who are not necessarily gender specialists. In the most cases,
project teams are never lacking commitment to gender. But, what is usually limiting is clarity on what needs to be done? With our SIMLESA
gender team in place, a solid strategy and an M&E framework, we have no excuses.
Discussions/ Questions/Comments/Observations
One critical issue that emerged after the mainstreaming gender presentation was for the SIMLESA program to critically look at its work plans
and see how gender could be integrated as this was not a negotiable activity. There was also a need to look at both male headed and female
headed households to check on which house hold type was severely hit by food shortages as these operate in different contexts and
environments. Survey data was available. This could be analyzed and a position found out.
Overall, the meeting agreed to synergize gender issues among research centers, stakeholders and the whole SIMLESA program.
Alignment of each Objective action plan with overall priorities: Plenary Review of Action Plans developed
for each objective
Objective one: Presented by Dr Adam Bekele
Questions/Comments/Observations
When we say technology adoption, do we mean in terms of time and scale? How is gender going to be addressed in Objective 1 – this is
currently missing in the plan. The objective should include the production of communication material such as policy briefs,
Adoption is a relative term – it takes into account land size, technology lifespan, the technology uptake itself if a farmer takes up a technology
for more than two times, this can be said the farmer has adopted the said technology.
31. Dr Menale Kassie said farmers can adopt a technology quickly depending on the performance of that technology – e.g. use of hybrid seed.
Adoption processes are also dynamic and we need to collect data every time.
The Objective need to highlight issues on milestones, dates, when the assignments will be completed and by whom. All these needs to be
aligned with the budget. It was also recommended that Objective 1 should work closely with Objective 3 to synchronize seed systems. On
policy briefs, the objective noted that these had been produced during SIMLESA 1.
What remains is to disseminate them through policy makers, publicize and communicate with .other relevant stakeholders. The Objective had
also undertaken a market study, which is currently being synthesized. The finalized product will be shared with policy makers through
meetings.
But participants asked if other SIMLESA projects could be confident to use the data. The Objective allayed this fear by saying if agronomic
information is in the study, this should be comprehensive enough.
Objective 2: Presented by Tadese Birhanu
Birhanu outlined the work plan for Objective 2.
Questions/Comments/Observations
On the budget, money was allocated equally among the centers- should this be the case since the centers have different needs. A call for
proposals from the research centers was agreed on.
Objective 3: Presented by Alemeshet Lema
Questions/Comments/Observations
Participants said they did not see hybrid seed technologies on demonstration plots on the Objective 3 work plan. Do we need to produce forage
on all centers or we should concentrate on a few? In addition, there is agroforestry information – do we need to evaluate this first?
Forage should be promoted on all centers, but these are typology focused - so encourage different varieties for different farms. Some centers
are already promoting forage technology.
On hybrid seed plans, some of the activities will focus on establishing community based seed organizations to provide seed, gemplasm and
increase awareness through knowledge sharing. The Objective will concentrate on promoting newly released varieties. It is also promoting new
varieties for CA; and others, such as BH547 (this does not fit under CA). The objective is promoting variety testing with farmers.
32. 32 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Objective 4: Presented by Dr Bediru Beshir
Dr Beshir outlined Objective 4’s activities and aligned them with the budget. Michael Misiko commented that Objective 4 had a lot of planned
work on demonstrations which would be implemented jointly with Objective 2. The work on policy briefs by Objective 1 would also be aligned
with the ones to be produced under Objective 4. To avoid duplication of activities, more ground work on scaling up activities would be
undertaken by Objective 4. Objective 4 did not allocate a budget on competitive grants as this is an activity under Objective 5. The work on
SMS – based activities would be implemented by ACIAR.
Questions/Comments/Observations
Isaiah Nyagumbo, Objective 2 leader said his objective would be scaling down some of its activities, such as field days, as these would fall under
Objective 4 in SIMLESA 2. Other participants advised Objective 4 to check on other objective activities to see whether they are any gaps.
Objective 4 should consult other objectives so as not to miss critical elements of the work.
As part of M and E, Objective 4 should seriously consider developing communication products on best practices, such as video documentaries as
a way of scaling out work, and working in collaboration with Objective 1.
The participants broke into two groups, CIMMYT and other stakeholders; while the other was composed of the National Research Systems,
including EIAR. In plenary the NARS reported back.
A representative of EIAR reported as follows:
Administration support
o Reporting problem from the centers
o Poor internal communication among the objective leaders and focal persons at each center
o The field visit report was not comprehensive and didn’t report all the results of the project activities
Problem with operational budget
Technical issues
o Lack of scaling-out strategies
o Need for proper documentation and communication of results/achievements in phase-1.
33. List of participants
Name Organization/Instituition
Dr. JJooee EEyyeerree TThhee UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff QQuueeeennssllaanndd
Gift Mashango CCIIMMMMYYTT,, ZZiimmbbaabbwwee
Abebaw Assaye PARC
Adane Melake EIAR/Pawe, Center Director
Alemayehu Mekonnen AAddaammaa,, PPVVTT SSeeeedd CCoommppaannyy
Alemayehu Zemede Hawasa Maize research subcenter, objective researcher
Alemeshet Lema EIAR/Melkassa
Alemu Tolemariam CIMMYT-Et
Ane de Valenga PPhhDD ssttuuddeenntt
Asheber Tegegn EIAR/Melkassa
Asrat Tera SARI, Livestock research Director
Bahiru Tilahun EIAR/Melkassa, Agronomist
Belay Hariso South Seed Enterprise
Danial Ambachew SARI/Hawassa, crop research director
Daniel Markos Project focal person and agronomist
Daniel W/giorgis EEIIAARR,, MM&&EE
Dr Fredric Bruono CCIIMMMMYYTT EEtt
Dr Vongai Kandiwa CIMMYT-Kenya, Gender Coordinator
Dr. Abebaw Shimelis SoRPARI, focal person and Socio-economist
Dr. Abebe Atilaw EEIIAARR,, tteecchhnnoollooggyy mmuullttiipplliiccaattiioonn ddiirreeccttoorr
Dr. Adam Bekele SSoocciioo--eeccoonnoommiisstt,, OObbjjeeccttiivvee 11 lleeaaddeerr
Dr. Bediru Beshir EIAR/Melkassa, Objective 1 coordinator
Dr. Berehanu Amsalu EIAR/Melkassa, National pulse research program coorinator
34. 34 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Dr. Eshetu Derso EIAR/HQ, Crop Research Directorate Director
Dr. Gezahegn Bogale EIAR/Melkassa, Maize Breeder
Dr. Haekoo Kim CIMMYT Et
Dr. Likawent Yiheyis ARARI, Livestock Research Director
Dr. Marenya, Paswel CIMMYT Et
Dr. Menale Kassie Socio-economist, CIMMYT Kenya
Dr. Michael Misiko CCIIMMMMYYTT EEtt
Dr. Moti Jaleta CIMMYT-ET
Dr. Nyagumbo, Isaiah CIMMYT Zim
Dr. Paswel Mareya CIMMYT ET
Dr. Rehima Mussema EIAR/HQ, gender focal perso n
Dr. Tafesse Geberu Ethiopia Seed Enterprise, General Manager
Dr.Dange Wegary CCIIMMMMYYTT EEtt
Dr.Haekoo Kim CCIIMMMMYYTT EETT
Dr.Yolisa Pakela-Jeazie ARC_SA
Elias Badorie Head of Burea of agric.
Genene Tesgaye SARI/HARC, Center director
George K. Mburathi AACCIIAARR CCoonnssuullttaanntt
Getachew Ayana Melkassa Agric RC, Center director
Gift Mashango CIMMYT ZIM
Goshime Muluneh EIAR/Hawassa, project focalperson
Johnson Siamachira CIMMYT-Zimbabwe
Kumessa Gudina Meki-Batu Union, Deputy Manager
Leulseged Tamene CIAT
Mekonnen F CIMMYT_ET
Misganawu Walies ARARI/Adet
Nigussie Hundessa Wondogenet ARC, Center director
Solomon Admassu PhD student
Solomon Jemal PhD student
Stuart Mars Irvine-Brown TThhee UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff QQuueeeennssllaanndd
Tadesse Birhanu OARI/Bako, focal person
Tafesse Geberu Ethiopian seed Enterprise, General Manager
Tesfaye Midega EIAR/Pawe ARC, Agronomist
Teshome Bogale OARI/Bako, Center Director
35. Tolera Keno
national maize program coordinator
Yayeh Bitew ARARI/Adet, Agronomist
Yeshitela Merene ARARI, Crop research director
Yohanes Seyoum Breeder, Somali Pastoralist-agropastoralist Research Institute (SoRPARI)
Zerihun Ababe OARI/Bako Agronomist
Zewudineh Melkie Project focal person, Pawe ARC, EIAR
Dr. Peter Craufurd CIMMYT- Kenya
Dr. Fred Kanpiu IITA
Dr. Endalkachew Woldmeskel IITA-et
36. 36 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014
Meeting Program
Program for SIMLESA Phase-II inception and planning meeting: 23-25 September 2014
Time Topic Responsible
DAY 1 (Tuesday, 23 Sep)
Session I: Introduction & Opening session Chair: Dr. Mulugeta Mekuria, Program coordinator,
CIMMYT
8:30-10:30 Welcome speech Dr. Nigussie Dana, DG, SARI
SIMLESA over all highlight and objectives/ expected deliverables Dr. Mulugeta Mekuria
Opening Speech Dr. Asnake Fikire, Crop RD,EIAR
10:30-11:00 Health Break & Photo Session Organizers
Session II: Progress presenations by CIMMYT objective coordinators Chair: Dr.Moti
11:00-11:40 Reflection on field visits of 2014 Group represenatives
11:40-12:30 Highlights of SIMLESA-II Objectives 1, 2,3 Dr. Paswel,/Dr.Menale, Dr. Isaiah/Dr. Haekoo, Dr. Dagne
12:30-12:50 Presentation Objective 4 and 5 Michael Misiko/Gift Mashango
12:50-13:10 General Discussion Chair/Presenters
13:10-14:00 Lunch Organizers
Session III: Parallel sessions/Deatiled activity/action plan Group Chairs
14:00-14:10 Orientation and group formation by objectives chair and objective leaders
14:10-17:30 Objective_1 Dr. Passwel/Dr Adam
Objective_2 Dr. Isaiah/hHaekoo/Tadesse
Objective_3 Dr. Dagne/Alemishet/Dr. gezahegn
37. Objective_4 Dr. Misiko/Dr.Bedru
17:30 End of Day 1 Participants
DAY 2 (Wednesday, 24 Sep)
08:30-13:00 Session III continued Group Chairs
13:00-14:00 Lunch Group Chair
14:00-17:30 Session IV
Plenary: review of action plans developed for each objectives Dr. Mulugeta Mekuria
17:30 End of Day 2 Organizers
08:30-11:30 Session V
Parallel sessions/action plan improvement as per discussion from session IV Group Chairs
11:30-13:00 Session VII: General Discussion and Wrap up
Dr. Nigussie Dana, DG, SARI
13:00-14:00 Lunch
14:00 Workshop Adjourns
38. 38 SIMLESA Phase 2 Program Planning Meetin, Hawassa, Ethopia – 23 -25 September 2014