The document discusses ethics considerations during pandemics and public health emergencies. It begins with a brief history of pandemics and infectious diseases. It then covers various bioethical frameworks and methods of analysis that can be applied to challenges that arise, including principlism, narrative ethics, and casuistry. The document also discusses the differences between clinical ethics and public health ethics. It uses several case examples to demonstrate how different bioethical approaches could be applied to issues like visitor restrictions, goals of care conversations, changing PPE recommendations, and resource allocation. Throughout, it emphasizes the importance of transparency, inclusion, reasonableness and revisiting decisions as more information becomes available.

1. Ethics in Pandemics:
Basic Principles and Advanced
Planning
Michael Aref, MD, PhD, FACP, FHM, FAAHPM, HMDC

2. Disclosures
• I have no financial disclosures.
• Opinions (and there is always opinion) expressed in this presentation
are my own and I cannot verify with certainty whether or not they
reflect the views of my employers or organization.

4. Infectious History
• Germ Theory was postulated by
Louis Pasteur in 1857.
• The first virus was discovered 1892.
• Viral vaccinations preceded the
discovery of viruses!
• The first antiviral medication,
amantadine, was discovered in
1966.
• 2005-2012 AIDS Pandemic – 36
million deaths
• 1968 H3N2 Influenza Pandemic – 1
million deaths
• 1956-1958 H2N2 Influenza
Pandemic – 2 million deaths
• 1918-1920 Influenza Pandemic –
20-50 million deaths
• 1910-1911 6th Cholera Pandemic –
800,000 deaths
• 1889-1890 H3N8 Influenza
Pandemic – 1 million deaths
www.mphonline.org/worst-pandemics-in-history/

5. Pandemics are in literature…

6. …movies and games

9. How Are You Right Now?
Happy
Sad
Scared Angry
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jun;145(6):708-30

10. Ethics Morals
What are they? The rules of conduct recognized in respect to
a particular class of human actions or a
particular group or culture.
Principles or habits with respect to right or
wrong conduct. While morals also prescribe dos
and don'ts, morality is ultimately a personal
compass of right and wrong.
Where do they come from? Social system - External Individual - Internal
Why we do it? Because society says it is the right thing to do. Because we believe in something being right or
wrong.
Flexibility Ethics are dependent on others for definition.
They tend to be consistent within a certain
context, but can vary between contexts.
Usually consistent, although can change if an
individual’s beliefs change.
The "Gray" A person strictly following Ethical Principles
may not have any Morals at all. Likewise, one
could violate Ethical Principles within a given
system of rules in order to maintain Moral
integrity.
A Moral Person although perhaps bound by a
higher covenant, may choose to follow a code of
ethics as it would apply to a system. "Make it fit"
Origin Greek word "ethos" meaning "character" Latin word "mos" meaning "custom"
Acceptability Ethics are governed by professional and legal
guidelines within a particular time and place
Morality transcends cultural norms
www.diffen.com/difference/Ethics_vs_Morals

11. Bioethical Methods of Analysis
• Principle Based (Principlism)
• Utilizes widely accepted norms of moral agency (the ability of an individual to make judgments of right and wrong) to
identify ethical concerns and determine acceptable resolutions for clinical dilemmas.
• Narrative Ethics
• Uses the nuances and complexities of stories (the narrative sequence), to identify and evaluate ethical dimensions of
situations.
• Virtue Ethics
• Believes that good medical practice requires a virtuous health care provider and the ultimate aim of medicine is the good of
the patient.
• Casuistry (The “Four Boxes”)
• A case-based approach to ethical decision making sharing many features with medical and legal decision making.
Appropriate actions depend on the specific features of a case.
• Religious/Theological Ethics
• Uses religious doctrine for norms of moral agency to identify ethical concerns and determine resolution for ethical
dilemmas.
• Feminist Ethics
• Highlights the potential power differentials that may exist between individuals due to professional standing, gender, race,
language, disability, etc. which can create barriers in the delivery of safe, effective medical care.
www.augusta.edu/institutes/ipph/cbhp/documents/primer_5_1_ethicsinhc.pdf

12. Principlist Bioethics

13. Casuistry (The “Four Boxes”)
Medical Indications Preferences of Patients
Beneficence and Non-maleficence
1. What is the patient’s medical problem?
2. Is the problem acute? Chronic? Critical? Reversible? Emergent? Terminal?
3. What are the goals of treatment?
4. In what circumstances are medical treatments not indicated?
5. What are the probabilities of success of various treatment options?
6. What are the risks of treatment?
7. In sum, how can this patient be benefited by medical, nursing or therapy care, and how can
harm be avoided?
Respect for Autonomy
1. Is the patient unwilling or unable to cooperate with medical treatment? If so, why?
2. Has the patient been informed of benefits and risks of diagnostic and treatment
recommendations, understood this information, and communicated consent?
3. Is the patient mentally capable (decision making capacity) and legally competent?
4. If mentally capable/competent, what are the patient’s preferences?
5. If incapacitated, has the patient expressed prior preferences?
6. Who is the appropriate surrogate to make decisions for an incapacitated patient?
7. What standards should govern the surrogate’s decisions?
Quality of Life Contextual Features
Beneficence and Non-maleficence and Respect for Autonomy
1. What are the prospects, with or without treatment, for a return to an acceptable quality of
life and what physical, mental, and social deficits might the patient experience even if
treatment succeeds?
2. On what grounds or by what criteria should evaluate the quality of life of a patient who
cannot make or express such a judgment?
3. Are there biases that might prejudice the provider’s evaluation of the patient’s quality of
life?
4. What ethical issues arise concerning improving or enhancing a patient’s quality of life?
5. Do quality of life assessment raise any questions that might contribute to a change of
treatment plan, such as forgoing life-sustaining treatment?
6. Are there plans to provide pain relief and provide comfort after a decision has been made to
forgo life-sustaining interventions?
7. Is medically assisted dying ethically or legally permissible?
Justice
1. Do decisions about treatment and diagnosis raise issues of fairness?
2. Are there professional, interprofessional, personal, interpersonal or business interests that
might create conflicts of interest in the clinical treatment of patients?
3. Are there parties other than clinicians and patient, such as family members, who have a
legitimate interest in clinical decisions?
4. What are the limits imposed on patient confidentiality by the legitimate interests of third
parties?
5. Are there financial factors that create conflicts of interest in clinical decisions?
6. Are there problems of allocation of resources that affect clinical decisions?
7. Are there religious factors that might influence clinical decisions?
8. What are the legal issues that might affect clinical decisions?
9. Are there considerations of clinical research and medical education that affect clinical
decisions?
10. Are there considerations of public heath and safety that influence clinical decisions? Does
institutional affiliation create conflicts of interest that might influence clinical decisions?

14. Clinical Ethics versus Public Health Ethics
Duty of Care
Recognize moral equality of persons
Promote equity in distribution of risks and benefits
www.thehastingscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/SlideDeck-HECCEC-COVID-19-Readiness.pdf

15. Case #1: Visitor Restrictions
• Healthcare facilities across the country have imposed visitor
restrictions during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic that either greatly limit
or completely eliminate visitor access. Is this ethical?

16. Case #1: Visitor Restrictions
Medical Indications Preferences of Patients
“Social distancing” has shown to decrease
transmission of SARS-CoV-2
Patients would likely prefer visitors and avoid SARS-
CoV-2 infection.
Quality of Life Contextual Features
Immediate quality of life is likely decreased with the
limitation of visitors. Overall quality of life for patients
in a healthcare system is likely improved with a
“flatter” curve.
SARS-CoV-2 is in community spread which has the
assumption everyone is transmitting the virus. WHO
and CDC are both advocating for social distancing as a
strategy to mitigate transmission.

17. Case #2: Goals of Care
• Is it ethically appropriate to engage in goals of care conversations
with patients prior to presentation with symptoms of COVID-19?

18. Case #2: Goals of Care
Medical Indications Preferences of Patients
COVID-19 is a new diagnosis that we ALL have. This
diagnosis, like many illnesses, has a much poorer
prognosis as we age and our immune systems wane.
As is true with other infections, it also appears to have
increased mortality with chronic lung disease, heart
failure, and chronic kidney disease. Thus incorporating
advance care planning with someone older than 65 or
someone who has COPD, heart failure, and/or chronic
kidney disease stage 3B or worse, is likely indicated in
context that this is a new piece of clinical information
that changes the future for all of us.
Goals of care discussions are the only way to
determine patient preferences. However, it is
important to ask permission to engage in these
conversations. Of note, there are patients who will
wishing to live as long as they can do not want to be
admitted to the hospital should they develop
respiratory failure from infection.
Quality of Life Contextual Features
Patients have generally reported improved quality of
life after goals of care conversations as this helps them
understand they may have less time than they
expected and may motivate them to complete things
on their “bucket list.”
Goals of care conversations are indicated whenever
there is an expected or new clinical change that may
make previous statements inaccurate or irrelevant.

19. Case # 3: Code Status and Novel Coronavirus
• Across the country there have been discussions regarding the
appropriateness of ACLS in COVID-19 patients.

20. Case # 3: Code Status and Novel Coronavirus
Medical Indications Preferences of Patients
Patients in cardiopulmonary arrest must have
treatment whether it is (a) focused on trying to
correct arrest with appropriate disease-focused
interventions or (b) focused on comfort to allow
natural death.
Must be established prior to arrest usually as reflected
by previous advance care planning or by direction
given by healthcare surrogates.
Quality of Life Contextual Features
Return of spontaneous circulation in cardiopulmonary
arrest particularly with chronic, life-limiting
comorbidities is associated with decreased functional
baseline, increased chronic comorbidity burden,
increased symptom burden, and decreased
independence.
Both intubation and advance cardiac life support have
increased risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to both
responding providers (via direct transmission) but also
to other patients (via both direct and indirect
transmission). Infected healthcare providers are
removed from the healthcare workforce decreasing
ability to care for increasing volume of patients.

21. inkvessel.com/2020/03/18/palliative-care-in-the-time-of-covid/

22. Triaging Resources
or when
Patients > Resources

23. Case #4: Organ Transplantation
• The classical ethical dilemma of too many patients with too few resources
occurs in organ transplantation: On average 17 people die per day due to
limitations on available organ allocation.
• Individual institutions determine who is “active” on their transplant list
through an organ allocation board composed of members of the transplant
team. Thus decisions are based on criteria as agreed upon by the
transplant board.
• Using the combination of donor and candidate information, the UNOS
computer system generates a “match run,” a rank-order list of candidates
to be offered each organ. This match is unique to each donor and each
organ. The candidates who will appear highest in the ranking are those
who are in most urgent need of the transplant, and/or those most likely to
have the best chance of survival if transplanted.
optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/learn/about-transplantation/how-organ-allocation-works/
unos.org/transplant/how-we-match-organs/

24. Case #5: Chronic US National Drug Shortages

25. Case #5: Chronic US National Drug Shortages
• US drug shortages are a chronic issue at baseline, only to be
exacerbated by insults to the supply chain like Hurricane Maria
destroying factories in Puerto Rico or our current pandemic leading to
supply shortages.
• These shortages direct care everyday by changing medical
management to use alternatives that may not be as effective as the
originally ordered medication.

26. Case #6: Staffing Shortages
• It is estimated at there is 1,200 patients with life-limiting illness for
each specialty palliative care provider.
• By comparison there are 141 cancer patients per oncologist.
• It is estimated that 30% of hospital patients “need” a palliative care
consult:
• At Carle Foundation Hospital that would be a 120 patient service, currently
we see about 30 in-patients per day.
• There a staffing shortages for techs, nurses, and other
specialties…everyday.
www.capc.org/about/press-media/press-releases/2016-9-9/Hospital-Palliative-Care-Programs-Understaffed/
www.ajmc.com/journals/evidence-based-oncology/2015/april-2015/how-and-why-oncologists-should-do-palliative-careor-get-some-assistance-doing-it-

27. Case #7: Disparities in Care
• If you are upper class, heterosexual, white, male you have a better
morbidity or mortality than someone
Lower class
Homosexual
Non-white
Female
• Due to implicit biases within the healthcare system.

28. Case #7: Disparities in Care
Rubix Life Sciences, COVID-19 and Minority Health Access, Infectious Disease Insights, March, 2020

29. Case #8: Changing Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) Recommendations
• Recommendations regarding use of PPE are excessively fluid. Three
weeks ago the proper use of an N95 was use once and dispose. This
week I could reuse it multiple times and handkerchiefs suddenly
became approved PPE. It’s the same virus but different rules, is it
ethical to expect me to do this?

30. Case #8: Changing PPE Recommendations
• Conventional capacity
• Measures consist of providing patient care without any change in daily contemporary
practices. This set of measures, consisting of engineering, administrative, and PPE
controls should already be implemented in general infection prevention and control
plans in healthcare settings.
• Contingency capacity
• Measures may change daily standard practices but may not have any significant
impact on the care delivered to the patient or the safety of HCP. These practices may
be used temporarily during periods of expected N95 respirator shortages.
• Crisis capacity
• Strategies that are not commensurate with U.S. standards of care. These measures,
or a combination of these measures, may need to be considered during periods of
known N95 respirator shortages.

31. Triage comes from an Old French word for “to
pick or cull”

32. Ethical Processes During a Disaster
Value Description
Accountability There should be mechanisms in place to ensure that ethical decision making is sustained throughout
the crisis.
Inclusiveness Decisions should be made explicitly with stakeholder views in mind and there should be opportunities
for stakeholders to be engaged in the decision-making process. For example, decision making related to
staff deployment should include the input of affected staff.
Openness and
transparency
Decisions should be publicly defensible. This means that the process by which decisions were
made must be open to scrutiny and the basis upon which decisions are made should be publicly
accessible to affected stakeholders. For example, there should be a communication plan developed in
advance to ensure that information can be effectively disseminated to affected stakeholders and that
stakeholders know where to go for needed information.
Reasonableness Decisions should be based on reasons (ie, evidence, principles, values) that stakeholders can agree are
relevant to meeting healthcare needs in a pandemic influenza crisis, and they
should be made by people who are credible and accountable. For example, decision makers should
provide a rationale for prioritizing particular groups for antiviral medication and for limiting access to
elective surgeries and other services.
Responsiveness There should be opportunities to revisit and revise decisions as new information emerges throughout
the crisis, as well as mechanisms to address disputes and complaints. For example, if elective surgeries
are cancelled or postponed, there should be a formal mechanism for stakeholders to voice any
concerns they may have with the decision.
Farmer JC et al. Preparing Your ICU For Disaster Response, Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2012

33. Resources Capacity (Operational Quality)
Stuff
Conservation
and use of
alternative
medications
Emergency
stockpiles
accessed
Reuse of critical
supplies
authorized
Triage protocols
activated
Supplies
unavailable or
unusable
Space
All usual beds
full / elective
discharges
All in-place and
reserve beds
activated and
filled
All facility areas
(e.g. hallways)
used and filled
Some areas
unsafe
Move patients
Infrastructure
destroyed
Staff
Reserve staff
needed
External staff
needed
Staff must
perform atypical
tasks
Lay volunteers
must perform
key aspects of
care
Few or no staff
available
Usual
operational
quality
“Conventional
operations”
Minimal or
transiently
degraded
quality
“Contingency
operations”
Modest or brief
degraded
quality
“Crisis
operations”
Significant or
ongoing
degraded
quality
Catastrophic
system failure
No care possible
www.thehastingscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/SlideDeck-HECCEC-COVID-19-Readiness.pdf

34. ICU Triage Protocol: Inclusion and Exclusion
Inclusion
• Shock requiring vasopressor
support
• Respiratory failure requiring
invasive positive pressure
ventilation
Exclusion
• Severe trauma
• Severe burns
• Cardiac arrest
• Advanced untreatable neuromuscular
disease
• Metastatic malignant disease
• Advanced and irreversible
immunocompromise
• Severe and irreversible neurologic event
or condition
• End-stage organ failure
CMAJ, November, 2006; 175(11):1377-1381

35. ICU Triage Protocol: Prioritization
Triage Code Criteria Action
Blue Exclusion criteria met or Sequential Organ Failure
Assessment (SOFA) score > 11
• Provide comfort focused care
• Discharge from critical care
Red SOFA score < 8 or single-organ failure Highest priority
Yellow SOFA score 8–11 Intermediate priority
Green No significant organ failure • Defer or discharge
• Reassess as needed
CMAJ, November, 2006; 175(11):1377-1381

36. Triage Process
• In the event of needing to triage resources, it cannot be expected that
a clinical individual at the bedside make these decisions.
• A committee of stakeholders needs to establish the criteria for when
to initiate and cease triaging resources.
• This triage protocol needs to be evidenced-based but adjustable with
changing clinical conditions.
• The triage decision making is performed by an independent allocation
committee, this allows the bedside provider to give the best care to
the patient as we are able in a crisis.

38. From Horror Springs Hope
• In a pandemic without the ability to treat, public health saves more
lives than clinical care. So why aren’t more clinicians engaged in
public health?
• There is a need for clinicians at all levels of administration, local, state
and federal government. Why aren’t we there?
• Weaknesses, injustices, and ethical issues in our healthcare system
are not necessarily caused by crisis rather they are exposed by it. Now
that these problems are exposed, what are we going to do about it?