The document discusses electro-erosion edge honing as a method for preparing cutting tool edges. It finds that the counterface material used in electro-erosion honing critically influences the resulting edge geometry, with softer materials producing honed edges and harder materials producing chamfered edges. Experimental results show that electro-erosion honed cutting tool edges last significantly longer than conventionally ground edges when dry cutting steel. The process also achieves more consistent edge geometry between tools compared to conventional honing methods.
1. Electro-erosion edge honing
of cutting tools
N. Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy
McMaster University, Canada
S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
2. Edge preparation of cutting tools
~ µm
chip
tool
hone
chamfer
work
Influences chip formation
Affects surface integrity
Precludes catastrophic tool failure
Enhances tool life & coatability
Ensures consistent tool performance
nose radius
X
X
edge radius measured
in X-X plane
2/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
3. Influence of edge radius on carbide inserts
An increase in edge radius from 8 µm to 35 µm
Delay in the onset of coating fracture
Four-fold improvement in tool life
Bouzakis et al (2002)
3/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
4. Enhancement in high speed steel tool life
Rech et al (2005)
Edge honing enhanced the life of ground tools by ~400%
Existence of an optimal cutting edge radius
4/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
5. Edge honing processes
micro blasting
www.osborn.com
www.comcoinc.com
brush honing
As high as ~50% variability in edge radius (Schimmel et al, 2000)
Variability between edges as well as along the same edge
Manufacturers hence generally specify edge hones in a range
Somewhat limited when processing polycrystalline diamond tools
5/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
6. Edge rounding in EDM
tool wear in EDM
rounded edges
Possibility of honing cutting edges by sink EDM
sharp
honing
hone
6/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
7. Electro-erosion edge honing
Honing of tools by sinking them into an
appropriate counterface
The high level of precision in EDM could
address the variability issue
Tools could be processed irrespective of
material hardness
tool
counterface
The volume of material removal
associated with hone generation is
very minimal
The relatively low material
removal rate of sink EDM is
of little consequence
Conservative EDM parameters may
be employed with a view to
preserving the integrity of the surface
7/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
8. Kinematic configurations
feed
symmetric hone
tool
Y
Z
counterface
X
rotation about X axis
rotation of tool about Z axis
asymmetric hone
increasing radius
along the edge
8/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
9. Experimental
AISI T-15 High Speed Steel
Aluminum counterface
Finish ground SNEA 320 inserts
10 mm edge length; 90° wedge angle
Dielectric oil; no external flushing
average voltage
80 V
peak current
1.8 A
polarity
pulse on-time
tool (−)
0.6 µs
duty factor
50%
machining time
80 s
Proof of concept & shape evolution
Assessment of tool performance & edge geometry
9/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
10. Measurement of edge radius
NURBS model
point cloud data
circular regression
on profile data
150
Knot Points
Edge Cross Section
Fitted Circle
Y [m]
100
50
confocal microscope
0
10/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
-50
100
150
200
250
60th CIRP General Assembly
300Pisa, August 25, 2010
350
400
11. Effect of counterface material on edge geometry
cutting edge
cutting edge
cutting edge
counterface
counterface
counterface
Aluminum counterface
Honed edge
Wear ratio = 0.5
Copper counterface
Chamfered edge
Wear ratio = 7.5
11/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
12. Geometric simulation of electro-erosion honing
sparking across
closest gap
06
54
03
51
0
51-
03-
54-
06-
material removal
from electrodes as
per wear ratio
053
063
073
electrode feed to
restore gap width
15 µm
wear ratio = 0.1
0.5
7.5 2.0
083
093
Fig. 3. Simulated effect of wear ratio on edge geometry.
004
12/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
13. Comparison of simulation with experiment
06
54
03
51
0
51-
03-
54-
06053
063
wear ratio = 0.1
0.5
7.5 2.0
073
15 µm
cutting edge
counterface
083
093
Fig. 3. Simulated effect of wear ratio on edge geometry.
004
wear ratio = 0.5
wear ratio = 7.5
cutting edge
counterface
13/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
14. Mechanism of edge generation
“high” wear ratio
chamfer
tool
counterface
hone
“low” wear ratio
14/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
15. Concept of a threshold wear ratio
counterface
wear ratio = 7.5
tool
A wear ratio much higher than the threshold
results in the generation of a chamfer
A wear ratio much lower than the threshold
results in extensive in-feed of the tool into
the counterface
rβ
feed
β
s
For β = 90°, rβ = 40 µm & s = 15 µm,
threshold wear ratio = 0.4
wear ratio = (Vt /Vc)
counterface
15/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
16. Electro-erosion honed surfaces
ground
EE-honed
200 µm
high speed steel
cemented carbide
extensive in-feed of cutting edge into
counterface (wear ratio ~ 0.01)
16/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
17. Time evolution of edge geometry
B
unprepared edge
D B
B
-30
Absolute(rβ = 22 µm)
fit circle
30 s Dradial deviation from
F
D
-40
fit circle F ~5% of edge radius
is
60 s (32.6 µm)
H
F
-50
H
10 µm
120
H
120 s (rβ = 40 µm)J sJ(40.3 µm)
-60
ground edge
circle fit (40.3 µm)
N N
J
-70
30 s5. Profilometer tracess (rHSS33 µm) 60
-60
-40
-20
0
N
Fig. (rβ = 22 µm) 60 20 β = 40
of
edges showing their evolution.
-20
0
20
40
60
-20
0
20
40
60
Concept of relative duty (Crookall & Fereday, 1973)
a
a
b
b
a
a
Greater rate of recession
on b-b compared to a-a
work
tool
b
b
17/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
18. Comparison of tool life
Variable speed tool life test (Armarego & Brown, 1969)
Annealed AISI 1045; dry cutting
0.15 mm feed; 0.5 mm depth of cut
300 µm max. flank wear tool life criterion
Tool life (min)
100
EE-honed edge
10
ground edge
1
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Cutting speed (m/min)
Significant increase in tool life due to:
Electro-erosion edge honing offsetting the negative influence
of grinding-induced micro-chipping
Reduction in the maximum tool temperature on account of
enhanced heat transfer associated with larger contact area
18/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
19. Edge radius (µm)
Variability in edge geometry
Boxes and whiskers refer to
25/75 and 1/99 percentiles,
respectively
45
40
35
30
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
Edge number
140 measurements over an edge length of 10 mm (edge 1 above)
indicated a mean of 32.1 µm and standard deviation of 1.6 µm,
which refers to a variability of ~15%
This is a significant improvement over conventional processes
wherein the corresponding variability could be on the order of 50%
about the mean radius
19/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
20. Conclusions
The application of electrical spark discharges
for edge honing has been demonstrated
The counterface material plays a critical role
in the geometry of the generated edge
Edge hones generated by electro-erosion
honing significantly improved the life of
ground tools
Electro-erosion honing corresponds to robust
edge geometry generation as compared to
conventional processes
20/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010
21. Canadian Network of Centers of Excellence
Thank you
for your
kind attention!
C4 Consortium of Ontario
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010