Electro Erosion Edge Honing

Electro-erosion edge honing
of cutting tools
N. Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy
McMaster University, Canada

S. Buchholz, F. Klocke
RWTH Aachen University, Germany

Edge preparation of cutting tools
~ µm

chip

tool

hone

chamfer

work

Influences chip formation
Affects surface integrity
Precludes catastrophic tool failure
Enhances tool life & coatability
Ensures consistent tool performance

nose radius

X

X

edge radius measured
in X-X plane
2/20
Electro-erosion edge honing of cutting tools
N.Z. Yussefian, P. Koshy, S. Buchholz, F. Klocke

60th CIRP General Assembly
Pisa, August 25, 2010

Influence of edge radius on carbide inserts
An increase in edge radius from 8 µm to 35 µm
Delay in the onset of coating fracture
Four-fold improvement in tool life
Bouzakis et al (2002)

3/20


Enhancement in high speed steel tool life
Rech et al (2005)

Edge honing enhanced the life of ground tools by ~400%
Existence of an optimal cutting edge radius
4/20


Edge honing processes
micro blasting

www.osborn.com

www.comcoinc.com

brush honing

As high as ~50% variability in edge radius (Schimmel et al, 2000)
Variability between edges as well as along the same edge
Manufacturers hence generally specify edge hones in a range
Somewhat limited when processing polycrystalline diamond tools
5/20


Edge rounding in EDM

tool wear in EDM

rounded edges

Possibility of honing cutting edges by sink EDM

sharp

honing

hone

6/20


Electro-erosion edge honing
Honing of tools by sinking them into an
appropriate counterface
The high level of precision in EDM could
address the variability issue
Tools could be processed irrespective of
material hardness

tool

counterface

The volume of material removal
associated with hone generation is
very minimal
The relatively low material
removal rate of sink EDM is
of little consequence

Conservative EDM parameters may
be employed with a view to
preserving the integrity of the surface
7/20



Kinematic configurations
feed
symmetric hone
tool
Y
Z

counterface

X

rotation about X axis

rotation of tool about Z axis

asymmetric hone
increasing radius
along the edge
8/20


Experimental
AISI T-15 High Speed Steel
Aluminum counterface
Finish ground SNEA 320 inserts
10 mm edge length; 90° wedge angle
Dielectric oil; no external flushing

average voltage

80 V

peak current

1.8 A

polarity
pulse on-time

tool (−)
0.6 µs

duty factor

50%

machining time

80 s

Proof of concept & shape evolution
Assessment of tool performance & edge geometry
9/20


Measurement of edge radius
NURBS model

point cloud data

circular regression
on profile data
150

Knot Points
Edge Cross Section
Fitted Circle

Y [m]

100

50

confocal microscope

0

10/20

-50
100

150

200

250

300Pisa, August 25, 2010
350
400

Effect of counterface material on edge geometry
cutting edge
cutting edge

cutting edge

counterface
counterface

counterface

Aluminum counterface
Honed edge
Wear ratio = 0.5

Copper counterface
Chamfered edge
Wear ratio = 7.5

11/20


Geometric simulation of electro-erosion honing
sparking across
closest gap

06

54

03

51

0

51-

03-

54-

06-

material removal
from electrodes as
per wear ratio

053
063
073

electrode feed to
restore gap width

15 µm

wear ratio = 0.1
0.5
7.5 2.0

083
093

Fig. 3. Simulated effect of wear ratio on edge geometry.

004

12/20


Comparison of simulation with experiment
06

54

03

51

0

51-

03-

54-

06053
063

wear ratio = 0.1
0.5
7.5 2.0

073
15 µm

cutting edge

counterface

083
093

Fig. 3. Simulated effect of wear ratio on edge geometry.

004

wear ratio = 0.5

wear ratio = 7.5

cutting edge

counterface

13/20


Mechanism of edge generation
“high” wear ratio

chamfer

tool

counterface
hone
“low” wear ratio

14/20


Concept of a threshold wear ratio
counterface

wear ratio = 7.5

tool

A wear ratio much higher than the threshold
results in the generation of a chamfer
A wear ratio much lower than the threshold
results in extensive in-feed of the tool into
the counterface

rβ
feed

β

s

For β = 90°, rβ = 40 µm & s = 15 µm,
threshold wear ratio = 0.4
wear ratio = (Vt /Vc)

counterface
15/20


Electro-erosion honed surfaces
ground

EE-honed
200 µm

high speed steel

cemented carbide

extensive in-feed of cutting edge into
counterface (wear ratio ~ 0.01)
16/20


Time evolution of edge geometry

B
unprepared edge
D B
B
-30
Absolute(rβ = 22 µm)
fit circle
30 s Dradial deviation from
F
D
-40
fit circle F ~5% of edge radius
is
60 s (32.6 µm)
H
F
-50
H
10 µm
120
H
120 s (rβ = 40 µm)J sJ(40.3 µm)
-60
ground edge
circle fit (40.3 µm)
N N
J
-70
30 s5. Profilometer tracess (rHSS33 µm) 60
-60
-40
-20
0
N
Fig. (rβ = 22 µm) 60 20 β = 40
of
edges showing their evolution.
-20
0
20
40
60
-20

0

20
40
60
Concept of relative duty (Crookall & Fereday, 1973)

a

a

b

b
a
a

Greater rate of recession
on b-b compared to a-a

work

tool
b

b

17/20


Comparison of tool life
Variable speed tool life test (Armarego & Brown, 1969)
Annealed AISI 1045; dry cutting
0.15 mm feed; 0.5 mm depth of cut
300 µm max. flank wear tool life criterion

Tool life (min)

100

EE-honed edge
10

ground edge
1
20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Cutting speed (m/min)

Significant increase in tool life due to:
Electro-erosion edge honing offsetting the negative influence
of grinding-induced micro-chipping
Reduction in the maximum tool temperature on account of
enhanced heat transfer associated with larger contact area
18/20


Edge radius (µm)

Variability in edge geometry
Boxes and whiskers refer to
25/75 and 1/99 percentiles,
respectively

45
40
35
30
25
1

2

3

4

5

6

Edge number

140 measurements over an edge length of 10 mm (edge 1 above)
indicated a mean of 32.1 µm and standard deviation of 1.6 µm,
which refers to a variability of ~15%
This is a significant improvement over conventional processes
wherein the corresponding variability could be on the order of 50%
about the mean radius
19/20


Conclusions
The application of electrical spark discharges
for edge honing has been demonstrated
The counterface material plays a critical role
in the geometry of the generated edge
Edge hones generated by electro-erosion
honing significantly improved the life of
ground tools
Electro-erosion honing corresponds to robust
edge geometry generation as compared to
conventional processes
20/20


Canadian Network of Centers of Excellence

Thank you
for your
kind attention!

C4 Consortium of Ontario



Electro Erosion Edge Honing

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Similar to Electro Erosion Edge Honing

More from koshyp

Recently uploaded

Electro Erosion Edge Honing