This document discusses the effect of applying a magnetic field to fuel on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions. It explains that incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons leads to wasted fuel and increased emissions. Applying a magnetic field can change the structure of hydrocarbon molecules, making them more reactive with oxygen and improving combustion. Test results showed that using a magnetic fuel device reduced fuel consumption by up to 28% and lowered emissions. The magnetic device provides similar benefits to a catalytic converter but is cheaper and does not require additional components or a warm-up period. In conclusion, magnetizing fuel provides an economically feasible way to boost engine efficiency and reduce toxic emissions.

1. EFFECT OF MAGNETIC FIELD
ON FUEL CONSUMPTION AND
EXHAUST EMISSIONS
Guide:
ARUN MOHAN
Submitted by: MANU MOHAN MAHESWARAN
M7B
ROLL NO:18

2. CONTENTS
• Introduction
• Fuel structure
• Applying Magnetic Field on Fuel
• Performance test and results
• Comparison between catalytic converter and magnetizer
• Conclusion
• Reference

3. INTRODUCTION
• Conservation of fuel
• Increasing pollution
• Only 60% of the fuel is completely burned and the
remaining are wastage
• Reduce efficiency
• Formation of CO,Nox on atmosphere

4. FUEL STRUCTURE
• Hydrogen is the major constituent of hydrocarbon
fuels
• Hydrogen has DIPOLE MOMENT
• Hydrogen can occur in two isometric forms-Para
and Ortho.
• It is characterized by the opposite spins of nucleus.

5. • The representation of para and ortho form is:
• Orthohydrogen is more reactive

6. NORMAL HYDROCARBON

7. WHY DOES INCOMPLETE
COMBUSTION OCCUR?
• Hydro carbons basically have a CAGE like
structure
• Less reactive para state
• Oxygen has 2 valence electrons and
hydrocarbons have neutral molecular
structure and hence they get repel each other

8. METHODS TO
OVERCOME
• Hydro carbon molecule could better bind with
oxygen molecule then combustion goes on easily
• Changing the state of hydrogen molecule from
para state to more reactive ortho state.

9. Effect of Magnetic Field on
Fuel

10. Normal hydrocarbon before Normal hydrocarbon after passing
flow through magnetic field through magnetic field

11. WORKING
• MAGNETIZER is a device which ionizes the fuel
being fed through it.
• Molecules of hydrocarbon change their configuration.
• Inter molecular force reduced / depressed.
• Interlocks with oxygen
• Reduce exhaust emission

12. MAGNETS USED
• A neodymium magnet(also known as NdFeB,NIB)
is a type of rare earth magnet
• Permanent magnet made from alloy of
neodymium, iron and boron to form Nd2Fe14B.
• It is tetragonal crystalline structure.
• It is the strongest type of permanent magnet made
having magnetic field of 3000 gauss

13. PERFORMANCE TEST
• Two-stroke Engine with spark ignition and capacity up to 5.5 hp
• Three accelerated rotation of the engine(3500,4500,5000)r.p.m,was taken
• Install magnetic device those have(2000,4000,6000,9000)Gauss.
•
Photograph of the fuel magnetization unit(1.Engine,2.Magnetic
device,3.measuring device for exhaust gases,4.Fuel
tank,5.Gas sensor,6.Valve,7.Fexible tube for fuel

14. RESULT
Reducing the amount of consumed fuel
with Increasing magnetic field intensity

15. Increased rate of fuel saving with increasing magnetic field
intensity

16. Decrease rate of co gas with magnetic Field intensity

17. Decrease rate of unburned hydrocarbon
With magnetic field intensity

18. COMPARISON BETWEEN
CATALYTICCONVERTER
AND MAGNETIZER
CATALYTIC CONVERTER MAGNETIZER
Most catalytic converters require air pumps to initiate
catalysis
They don’t require air pumps.
Catalytic converters require a light-off temperature to be
attained before they become operative
Any temperature need not be attained
High cost Relatively cheaper
Cannot be transferred from vehicle to other one Can easily be transferred from vehicle to vehicle
Warranty is limited Lifetime
20 to 50,00 miles depending on the vehicle it is fitted
on
Never wears out

19. MERITS
• Increase fuel economy
• Reduced knocking and detonation
• Decrease smoke emission
• No fuel wastage
• Up to 20% of fuel saving
• Smooth running and long term
maintenance free engine

20. CONCLUSION
• Economically feasible
• Lowest possible level of toxic emission.
• Save the fuel up to 28%.
• Reduces the maintenance of vehicle.

21. References
• Ali S. Faris et al, “Effects of Magnetic Field on Fuel Consumption and Exhaust
• Emissions in Two-Stroke Engine” , Energy Procedia 18 ( 2012 ) 327 – 338
• Piyush M Patel et al, ”performance and Emission analysis of Single Cylinder Diesel
Engine under the Influence of Magnetic Fuel Energizer” ,IOSR Journal of
Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE)e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-
334X, Volume 11, Issue 2 Ver. VIII (Mar- Apr. 2014), PP 34-39www.iosrjournals.org
• Ajay Kumar Agarwal,”Fuel Energizer: The Magnetizer (A Concept of Liquid
Engineering)” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH &
DEVELOPMENT April, 2013 Vol 2 Issue 4
• P.Govindhasamy ans S.Dhandapani,” Performance and emission achievement by
magnetic energizer with a single cylinder two stroke catalytic spark ignition engine”,
Journal of scientific &industrial research Vol 66,June 2007

22. Thank you…..