This document provides information about reviewing literature for research. It defines a literature review as a written summary of past and current research on a topic. The purpose of a literature review is to define the research problem, avoid duplication, understand methodology, and identify gaps to position new research. It discusses primary sources like research articles and secondary sources like reviews. It also outlines various reference materials that can be used in a literature review like encyclopedias, dictionaries, thesauruses, yearbooks, directories, and indexes.
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluations.
The document provides guidance on developing a strong research question for a social studies project. It explains that a good research question addresses an issue or problem that cannot be answered by a single fact or source. Students are instructed to consider a broad topic, narrow it to a specific aspect, and write 3-4 open-ended questions to help select the best research question. Examples of potential research topics related to the Progressive Era are given to help students generate their own questions.
- The document discusses grounded theory as a research method for understanding the teacher-student relationship in an English writing classroom. It outlines the research questions and describes collecting data through classroom observations, student and teacher interviews, and analyzing the data using open, axial and selective coding to develop a theory grounded in the data. The goal is to discover the elements of the teacher-student relationship that most impact student writing improvement and outcomes.
This document provides guidance on writing a critical review. It defines a critical review as a text that discusses and evaluates another work such as an article or book. The purpose is to summarize and evaluate the text. A critical review follows a similar structure regardless of length, including an introduction, summary, and critique section. The introduction presents the work, its topic and purpose. The summary explains the key points without evaluation. The critique evaluates the strengths, weaknesses and features of the text based on criteria such as significance, methodology, arguments, and writing style. A conclusion restates the overall opinion and recommendations.
Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)Dilip Barad
Literature Review or Review of Related Literature is one of the most vital stages in any research. This presentation attempts to throw some light on the process and important aspects of literature review.
Howdy! Take a look at this great presentation and find some useful tips on writing research proposal. For more information visit https://www.writingaresearchproposal.com/
This document provides an overview of academic writing. It defines academic writing as the formal writing style used in colleges and universities that is expected of students and researchers. Some key characteristics are a formal tone, precise language, third-person point of view, research focus, logical organization, and inclusion of citations. The document also distinguishes between primary sources as original materials, secondary sources as analyses of primary sources, and tertiary sources as compilations of other sources. Finally, it outlines the essential steps of selecting a topic, researching, developing a thesis, outlining, writing drafts, revising, and proofreading.
This document provides information about reviewing literature for research. It defines a literature review as a written summary of past and current research on a topic. The purpose of a literature review is to define the research problem, avoid duplication, understand methodology, and identify gaps to position new research. It discusses primary sources like research articles and secondary sources like reviews. It also outlines various reference materials that can be used in a literature review like encyclopedias, dictionaries, thesauruses, yearbooks, directories, and indexes.
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluations.
The document provides guidance on developing a strong research question for a social studies project. It explains that a good research question addresses an issue or problem that cannot be answered by a single fact or source. Students are instructed to consider a broad topic, narrow it to a specific aspect, and write 3-4 open-ended questions to help select the best research question. Examples of potential research topics related to the Progressive Era are given to help students generate their own questions.
- The document discusses grounded theory as a research method for understanding the teacher-student relationship in an English writing classroom. It outlines the research questions and describes collecting data through classroom observations, student and teacher interviews, and analyzing the data using open, axial and selective coding to develop a theory grounded in the data. The goal is to discover the elements of the teacher-student relationship that most impact student writing improvement and outcomes.
This document provides guidance on writing a critical review. It defines a critical review as a text that discusses and evaluates another work such as an article or book. The purpose is to summarize and evaluate the text. A critical review follows a similar structure regardless of length, including an introduction, summary, and critique section. The introduction presents the work, its topic and purpose. The summary explains the key points without evaluation. The critique evaluates the strengths, weaknesses and features of the text based on criteria such as significance, methodology, arguments, and writing style. A conclusion restates the overall opinion and recommendations.
Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)Dilip Barad
Literature Review or Review of Related Literature is one of the most vital stages in any research. This presentation attempts to throw some light on the process and important aspects of literature review.
Howdy! Take a look at this great presentation and find some useful tips on writing research proposal. For more information visit https://www.writingaresearchproposal.com/
This document provides an overview of academic writing. It defines academic writing as the formal writing style used in colleges and universities that is expected of students and researchers. Some key characteristics are a formal tone, precise language, third-person point of view, research focus, logical organization, and inclusion of citations. The document also distinguishes between primary sources as original materials, secondary sources as analyses of primary sources, and tertiary sources as compilations of other sources. Finally, it outlines the essential steps of selecting a topic, researching, developing a thesis, outlining, writing drafts, revising, and proofreading.
This presentation gives effcient information as for writing a Scientific Research Paper. There is also an article which has more details regarding this topic https://essay-academy.com/account/blog/writing-a-scientific-research-paper
Key Driver Analysis: A Crash Course in Customer Experience Reporting | SoGoSu...Sogolytics
Ready to improve customer experience -- but not sure where to start? Key Driver Analysis delivers instant insights by charting the correlation between CX metrics and key variables, identifying the greatest opportunities for improvement. Learn more, then check it out!
This document provides guidance on choosing a research topic by outlining important factors to consider like ability, interest, and resources. It recommends starting with a general topic of at least two words and then thinking of related concepts to identify relationships and formulate questions that could lead to a specific research topic containing a minimum of five words. The more words used, the more specific the topic becomes.
This document outlines the components and structure of a research proposal. It begins by defining what a research proposal is and its purpose. It then discusses each section in detail, including the introduction, literature review, methodology, expected results, budget, and timeline. Key elements that should be included in each section are identified, such as clearly stating the research problem in the introduction and describing data collection and analysis plans in the methodology. Common mistakes to avoid are also outlined. Overall, this document provides a comprehensive guide for writing an effective research proposal.
This document provides guidance on writing and publishing research papers. It discusses why publishing is important for academic growth and recognition from peers. It also outlines the process of publishing, including developing a research plan, maintaining records, attending conferences, and periodically reviewing work. The document describes different types of manuscripts and focuses on writing tips, such as knowing the target journal, being concise, and using an ideal published article as a reference. It provides direction on key elements of manuscripts like the title, abstract, keywords, introduction, body, discussion, and references. The review process is also summarized.
[Enago] Introduction to Academic Publishingsejin cheon
This document provides an overview of the academic publishing process, including the different types of papers, how to structure an academic manuscript, writing dos and don'ts, what publishers look for, and important resources. It discusses the main types of papers such as research articles, case reports, and review articles. It provides tips for writing each section of a paper, including determining the research gap, developing the literature review, methodology, results, and discussion. The document emphasizes writing clearly, using the active voice, and having language reviewed prior to submission.
The document discusses various metrics used to evaluate journals and authors, including the Impact Factor, h-index, and Eigenfactor. It describes what each metric measures, how it is calculated, and its advantages and limitations. In particular, it notes that the Impact Factor only looks at citations over a two year period, while the Eigenfactor and SJR take a longer, five year view and weight citations differently based on the influence of the citing journal. For authors, the h-index and its variants aim to capture both productivity and citation impact, but have limitations such as field differences and inability to decrease over time.
The document provides an overview of the key components needed for a research proposal. It discusses the purpose of a proposal in focusing the research plans and preparation for ethics committee approval. The proposal should address what will be accomplished, why it is being done, and how it will be done. The document then outlines the typical sections in a research proposal, including the title, introduction, literature review, research question/objectives, methodology, statistical analysis, anticipated results, and discussion. It provides guidance on the content and structure for each section to ensure the proposal clearly defines and justifies the proposed research.
The document discusses the value of ScienceDirect, which is Elsevier's full-text database containing over 14 million publications from journals and books. It provides key facts about ScienceDirect, including that it covers 24 subject areas and contains content dating back to 1823. Charts and statistics are presented showing the wide geographic distribution of authors and readers on the platform from over 200 countries, demonstrating how ScienceDirect facilitates global sharing of research. The presentation aims to highlight how ScienceDirect ensures visibility and access to scientific knowledge from around the world.
Literature review for a dissertation: a step-by-step guideOlga Koz, DM, MLS
This document provides a step-by-step guide to conducting a literature review. It outlines the key phases including determining scope, searching literature sources, organizing sources, analyzing and synthesizing findings, and determining when to stop adding sources. The guide discusses searching academic databases and other sources, distinguishing academic from practitioner articles, tracking relevant research over time, and using citation indexes and reference lists to find related work. It also reviews strategies for mapping relationships between sources and organizing the review, as well as considering different levels of coverage from exhaustive to sample-based reviews.
What are the Steps for a Successful Thesis Proposal Defense PresentationThesis Presentation
Howdy! Take a look at this presentation and learn what are the main steps for a successful thesis proposal defense presentation. For more details visit site http://www.thesispresentation.com/
Researcher IDs like Researcher ID (Web of Science), Scopus ID (Elsevier), and ORCID provide persistent digital identifiers that distinguish researchers and link them to their professional activities and publications. These IDs help solve author ambiguity issues, allow researchers to track citations and collaborate. Publications from Researcher ID, Scopus, and Google Scholar can be imported into an ORCID profile to consolidate a researcher's work.
Mendeley is a bibliographic management tool that allows users to organize papers and citations, create bibliographies, and integrate with Word. It provides searchable full-text storage and allows users to collaborate by joining groups. Mendeley also functions as a social network for researchers to find others with similar interests.
How to write a Research/Review article: Suggestions for beginnersLakhan Kumar
If you're a beginner, you may find this document useful while writing a review or research article. I have collected this information from various articles published by University Libraries, Researchers, Journal houses, and Individuals (Our Seniors) in the public domain. It was very useful to me and I hope it will be a help for you too.
This document discusses the importance of reviewing related literature for research. It notes that literature reviews give researchers basic knowledge in their field and help relate their current research to past work. The purposes of literature reviews are to study topics of interest, get approval from experts, limit topics, prepare for projects, and avoid replicating past research unnecessarily. Researchers should cite sources to avoid plagiarism and gain credibility. There are various citation styles and the sources cited must be included in both in-text citations and a reference list.
This document provides an overview of bibliometrics and discusses various bibliometric indicators and tools. It describes what bibliometrics is, why it is used, and different bibliometric indicators like the impact factor, h-index, SNIP, SJR, and altmetrics. It discusses bibliometric data sources like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and provides pros and cons of each. The document concludes that no single metric can provide a complete picture and that metrics should be used to improve research assessment rather than rely on a single number or tool.
The document discusses undertaking literature reviews for research projects. It notes that literature reviews are often weak aspects of student work due to insufficient time and poor execution. It emphasizes the importance of literature reviews for situating a research topic within a field of existing knowledge and avoiding unintentional plagiarism. The document outlines the process of conducting a systematic literature review, including defining the research topic, identifying relevant search terms, searching academic databases, and collating sources. It stresses evaluating sources based on type and reviewing hierarchy to ensure the use of appropriate academic texts.
This document provides an outline for a training session on publishing research in international scholarly journals. The objectives of the training are to teach research coordinators about the publishing process, how to select journals, write cover letters and manage submissions, understand open access options and predatory journals, and how to deal with reviewers and editorial comments. The methodology will include interactive lectures, group and individual work, internet/web sessions, and assignments. The contents and plan lists the session titles, durations, methods, and activities. Topics that will be covered include the publishing process, selecting journals and writing cover letters, ethical issues in publishing, the submission process, and dealing with reviewers and editors.
This document provides an introduction to databases and how to search them. It defines databases as online containers that hold a variety of academic materials like journal articles and peer-reviewed papers. It describes two types of databases - open access databases that are freely available and closed access databases that require institutional access. It highlights some key library databases and their benefits over sources like Google Scholar or Google for finding reliable scholarly information. It provides guidance on searching databases, including using keywords, Boolean operators, subject headings from thesauruses, and tips for developing effective search strategies.
This document provides guidance on successfully navigating the grant application process. It discusses identifying a novel research idea, finding relevant grant opportunities, crafting a competitive application, and positioning proposals for funding. Key recommendations include developing a clear and compelling narrative, demonstrating the significance of the research, establishing credibility as an applicant who can accomplish the work, and guiding reviewers efficiently through the proposal. Attention to concision, confidence, clarity and revision are emphasized for crafting a proposal that will persuade reviewers.
This presentation deals with enhancing Quality of Research in Social Sciences. It enlists the problems faced , errors in research and guides on improving Quality of Research.
This presentation gives effcient information as for writing a Scientific Research Paper. There is also an article which has more details regarding this topic https://essay-academy.com/account/blog/writing-a-scientific-research-paper
Key Driver Analysis: A Crash Course in Customer Experience Reporting | SoGoSu...Sogolytics
Ready to improve customer experience -- but not sure where to start? Key Driver Analysis delivers instant insights by charting the correlation between CX metrics and key variables, identifying the greatest opportunities for improvement. Learn more, then check it out!
This document provides guidance on choosing a research topic by outlining important factors to consider like ability, interest, and resources. It recommends starting with a general topic of at least two words and then thinking of related concepts to identify relationships and formulate questions that could lead to a specific research topic containing a minimum of five words. The more words used, the more specific the topic becomes.
This document outlines the components and structure of a research proposal. It begins by defining what a research proposal is and its purpose. It then discusses each section in detail, including the introduction, literature review, methodology, expected results, budget, and timeline. Key elements that should be included in each section are identified, such as clearly stating the research problem in the introduction and describing data collection and analysis plans in the methodology. Common mistakes to avoid are also outlined. Overall, this document provides a comprehensive guide for writing an effective research proposal.
This document provides guidance on writing and publishing research papers. It discusses why publishing is important for academic growth and recognition from peers. It also outlines the process of publishing, including developing a research plan, maintaining records, attending conferences, and periodically reviewing work. The document describes different types of manuscripts and focuses on writing tips, such as knowing the target journal, being concise, and using an ideal published article as a reference. It provides direction on key elements of manuscripts like the title, abstract, keywords, introduction, body, discussion, and references. The review process is also summarized.
[Enago] Introduction to Academic Publishingsejin cheon
This document provides an overview of the academic publishing process, including the different types of papers, how to structure an academic manuscript, writing dos and don'ts, what publishers look for, and important resources. It discusses the main types of papers such as research articles, case reports, and review articles. It provides tips for writing each section of a paper, including determining the research gap, developing the literature review, methodology, results, and discussion. The document emphasizes writing clearly, using the active voice, and having language reviewed prior to submission.
The document discusses various metrics used to evaluate journals and authors, including the Impact Factor, h-index, and Eigenfactor. It describes what each metric measures, how it is calculated, and its advantages and limitations. In particular, it notes that the Impact Factor only looks at citations over a two year period, while the Eigenfactor and SJR take a longer, five year view and weight citations differently based on the influence of the citing journal. For authors, the h-index and its variants aim to capture both productivity and citation impact, but have limitations such as field differences and inability to decrease over time.
The document provides an overview of the key components needed for a research proposal. It discusses the purpose of a proposal in focusing the research plans and preparation for ethics committee approval. The proposal should address what will be accomplished, why it is being done, and how it will be done. The document then outlines the typical sections in a research proposal, including the title, introduction, literature review, research question/objectives, methodology, statistical analysis, anticipated results, and discussion. It provides guidance on the content and structure for each section to ensure the proposal clearly defines and justifies the proposed research.
The document discusses the value of ScienceDirect, which is Elsevier's full-text database containing over 14 million publications from journals and books. It provides key facts about ScienceDirect, including that it covers 24 subject areas and contains content dating back to 1823. Charts and statistics are presented showing the wide geographic distribution of authors and readers on the platform from over 200 countries, demonstrating how ScienceDirect facilitates global sharing of research. The presentation aims to highlight how ScienceDirect ensures visibility and access to scientific knowledge from around the world.
Literature review for a dissertation: a step-by-step guideOlga Koz, DM, MLS
This document provides a step-by-step guide to conducting a literature review. It outlines the key phases including determining scope, searching literature sources, organizing sources, analyzing and synthesizing findings, and determining when to stop adding sources. The guide discusses searching academic databases and other sources, distinguishing academic from practitioner articles, tracking relevant research over time, and using citation indexes and reference lists to find related work. It also reviews strategies for mapping relationships between sources and organizing the review, as well as considering different levels of coverage from exhaustive to sample-based reviews.
What are the Steps for a Successful Thesis Proposal Defense PresentationThesis Presentation
Howdy! Take a look at this presentation and learn what are the main steps for a successful thesis proposal defense presentation. For more details visit site http://www.thesispresentation.com/
Researcher IDs like Researcher ID (Web of Science), Scopus ID (Elsevier), and ORCID provide persistent digital identifiers that distinguish researchers and link them to their professional activities and publications. These IDs help solve author ambiguity issues, allow researchers to track citations and collaborate. Publications from Researcher ID, Scopus, and Google Scholar can be imported into an ORCID profile to consolidate a researcher's work.
Mendeley is a bibliographic management tool that allows users to organize papers and citations, create bibliographies, and integrate with Word. It provides searchable full-text storage and allows users to collaborate by joining groups. Mendeley also functions as a social network for researchers to find others with similar interests.
How to write a Research/Review article: Suggestions for beginnersLakhan Kumar
If you're a beginner, you may find this document useful while writing a review or research article. I have collected this information from various articles published by University Libraries, Researchers, Journal houses, and Individuals (Our Seniors) in the public domain. It was very useful to me and I hope it will be a help for you too.
This document discusses the importance of reviewing related literature for research. It notes that literature reviews give researchers basic knowledge in their field and help relate their current research to past work. The purposes of literature reviews are to study topics of interest, get approval from experts, limit topics, prepare for projects, and avoid replicating past research unnecessarily. Researchers should cite sources to avoid plagiarism and gain credibility. There are various citation styles and the sources cited must be included in both in-text citations and a reference list.
This document provides an overview of bibliometrics and discusses various bibliometric indicators and tools. It describes what bibliometrics is, why it is used, and different bibliometric indicators like the impact factor, h-index, SNIP, SJR, and altmetrics. It discusses bibliometric data sources like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and provides pros and cons of each. The document concludes that no single metric can provide a complete picture and that metrics should be used to improve research assessment rather than rely on a single number or tool.
The document discusses undertaking literature reviews for research projects. It notes that literature reviews are often weak aspects of student work due to insufficient time and poor execution. It emphasizes the importance of literature reviews for situating a research topic within a field of existing knowledge and avoiding unintentional plagiarism. The document outlines the process of conducting a systematic literature review, including defining the research topic, identifying relevant search terms, searching academic databases, and collating sources. It stresses evaluating sources based on type and reviewing hierarchy to ensure the use of appropriate academic texts.
This document provides an outline for a training session on publishing research in international scholarly journals. The objectives of the training are to teach research coordinators about the publishing process, how to select journals, write cover letters and manage submissions, understand open access options and predatory journals, and how to deal with reviewers and editorial comments. The methodology will include interactive lectures, group and individual work, internet/web sessions, and assignments. The contents and plan lists the session titles, durations, methods, and activities. Topics that will be covered include the publishing process, selecting journals and writing cover letters, ethical issues in publishing, the submission process, and dealing with reviewers and editors.
This document provides an introduction to databases and how to search them. It defines databases as online containers that hold a variety of academic materials like journal articles and peer-reviewed papers. It describes two types of databases - open access databases that are freely available and closed access databases that require institutional access. It highlights some key library databases and their benefits over sources like Google Scholar or Google for finding reliable scholarly information. It provides guidance on searching databases, including using keywords, Boolean operators, subject headings from thesauruses, and tips for developing effective search strategies.
This document provides guidance on successfully navigating the grant application process. It discusses identifying a novel research idea, finding relevant grant opportunities, crafting a competitive application, and positioning proposals for funding. Key recommendations include developing a clear and compelling narrative, demonstrating the significance of the research, establishing credibility as an applicant who can accomplish the work, and guiding reviewers efficiently through the proposal. Attention to concision, confidence, clarity and revision are emphasized for crafting a proposal that will persuade reviewers.
This presentation deals with enhancing Quality of Research in Social Sciences. It enlists the problems faced , errors in research and guides on improving Quality of Research.
This document provides guidance on writing an effective research proposal for funding agencies. It discusses that a proposal should include details about the problem being studied, how the investigation will be conducted, expected results and timelines. It also outlines the key elements that a strong proposal contains, such as an introduction with the research problem and objectives, a literature review, methodology, budget, work schedule and references. The proposal writing process involves identifying an idea, developing a plan, researching potential funders, and writing the proposal. Major funding agencies in India that may support research proposals are also listed.
How to write Research Proposal Writing.pptqarirohullah
This document provides guidance on writing a strong research proposal. It emphasizes focusing the proposal around key elements such as the background, purpose, methods, and timeline. The methods section should include detailed descriptions of the study design, sample, setting, protocol, and data analysis plan. Common pitfalls to avoid include missing these key elements or providing insufficient detail. With careful planning and following the outlined structure, proposals can be improved to increase the chances of securing needed funding.
This document discusses careers beyond academia for PhDs. It notes that only about 47% of PhDs will obtain academic jobs due to competitive markets, and that many PhDs pursue careers outside of academia. It outlines alternative career paths including research institutes, publishing, consulting, teaching, and more. It emphasizes the importance of researching career options, understanding how recruiters view PhDs, articulating skills in industry terms, networking, crafting strong applications, and using resources for career support and advice when pursuing non-academic jobs.
This document provides guidance on writing a fundable research proposal. It discusses the benefits of research for students, faculty, and institutions. Key benefits include hands-on learning, career preparation, developing critical thinking skills, and attracting engaged students and funding. The document also outlines factors that make proposals fundable such as developing an original idea that solves an important problem, targeting the right funding agency, and clearly stating the problem, approach, and why it was chosen. It emphasizes the importance of networking, collaboration, and persistence in the proposal process.
Research Methodology | Dr G S Javed | King ConsultantsJaved G S, PhD
Research Methodology allows you to streamline your search for a a new solution. It allows you to narrow down to a finite number of choices to solve your problem.
Research Integrity - Supervision Enhancement Program, Feb 2016Merilyn Childs
The document provides guidance for supervisors of Higher Degree Research (HDR) candidates on research integrity and ethics. It discusses policies regarding authorship, plagiarism, contract cheating and managing conflicts of interest. It also describes resources available through the university's Research Integrity Office, such as training and advice on handling allegations of misconduct. The document emphasizes supervisors' responsibility for ensuring candidates conduct ethical research and comply with relevant codes of conduct.
Postdoc Orientation: Integration Strategies at HMSJames Gould, PhD
At the 11th Annual National Postdoctoral Association (NPA) Meeting (Charleston, 2013) I co-presented with Tom Geoghegan (Louisville) on postdoc orientation strategies at our respective institutions.
This document provides an introduction to research. It defines research and explains that true research is driven by a specific question aimed at discovering something previously unknown. The document outlines different types of research including descriptive, explanatory, and evaluative research. It discusses why studying research is important, who conducts research, and research paradigms including positivism and phenomenology. Qualitative and quantitative approaches are compared, and elements of the research process like deductive and inductive reasoning are explained. Common data collection methods like interviews and observation are also introduced. The document provides a high-level overview of key concepts in understanding and conducting research.
Creating a thriving research environmentEmma Gillaspy
Workshop by Justin Hutchence (Research Staff Development Manager, University of Reading) and Christos Petichakis (Educational Developer, University of Liverpool) at the Vitae event 'Preparing for the Research Excellence Framework: Researcher development, the environment and future impact' on 11 July 2012 in Manchester www.vitae.ac.uk/preparingfortheref
This is from a webinar presented by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide called “Critical Thinking for Leadership.” The presenter is Dr. Matthew Earnhardt
Trend Spotting Workshop. A practical guide to making sense of large information sources. Workshop run with Gemma Long (QAA) at etc.venues Maple House, Birmingham, 23rd February 2017.
The document provides an overview of the PhD process at UCD School of Mathematical Sciences. It discusses the standards required for a PhD degree including independence, originality, contribution to knowledge, and work suitable for publication. It outlines the research process, emphasizing the importance of planning, execution, analysis, and reporting. It also discusses the responsibilities of students and supervisors, criteria for assessing PhD theses, authorship, and responsible research conduct. Throughout it emphasizes that a PhD requires solid, independent work to advance understanding in a research area.
10 SIMPLE STEPS TO BUILDING A REPUTATION AS A RESEARCHER, IN YOUR EARLY CAREERMicah Altman
The document outlines 10 simple steps for building a reputation as a researcher early in one's career. It begins with an introduction and disclaimer from the author. It then provides perspectives on building a reputation from scientometrics, advice from other academic books and articles, and limitations of impact metrics. The overall message is that researchers should focus on collaboration, open sharing of work, clear communication, responding to feedback, and participating in the broader academic community. Regular publishing, data sharing, and engaging on social media can help increase the impact and visibility of one's research.
This document provides guidance on conducting clinical research. It discusses that good clinical research must answer an unresolved research question and solve the problem or question. Additionally, it should have a good presentation and style, demonstrate adequate knowledge of the literature, and use good research techniques and methods. The document emphasizes the importance of being motivated to conduct clinical research and provides tips for various stages of the research process, including defining the problem, conducting a literature review, collaborating with others, tracking progress, managing time, and writing up the research findings. It stresses that clinical research should contribute new knowledge and offer original insights.
This document provides guidance on developing a successful research proposal. It discusses the purpose of proposals, when they should be written, and core components to include. Key elements are an indication of why the problem is important, a description of the research question and methodology, and a review of relevant literature. Additional components may include how findings will be disseminated and addressing reliability, validity, ethics and potential problems. The document provides examples and advice for writing strong titles, defining concepts and limits, conducting a literature review, demonstrating significance, and using appropriate methodology. It concludes with sample criteria for evaluating proposals, such as clearly identifying the problem, using a suitable approach, and ensuring feasibility.
This document outlines the research process from start to finish. It begins by defining research as a careful investigation aimed at discovering new information or revising current understanding. It then distinguishes between quantitative and qualitative research approaches. The document describes each step of the research process in detail, including refining an idea based on background research, conducting experiments or investigations, documenting work, evaluating results, and presenting findings. The overall process involves starting with an idea, investigating previous work, refining the idea, doing the core investigative work, evaluating outcomes, identifying future work, and disseminating the research.
Information and Communication Technology in EducationMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 2)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐂𝐓 𝐢𝐧 𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:
Students will be able to explain the role and impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in education. They will understand how ICT tools, such as computers, the internet, and educational software, enhance learning and teaching processes. By exploring various ICT applications, students will recognize how these technologies facilitate access to information, improve communication, support collaboration, and enable personalized learning experiences.
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐭:
-Students will be able to discuss what constitutes reliable sources on the internet. They will learn to identify key characteristics of trustworthy information, such as credibility, accuracy, and authority. By examining different types of online sources, students will develop skills to evaluate the reliability of websites and content, ensuring they can distinguish between reputable information and misinformation.
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
How to Setup Default Value for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, we can set a default value for a field during the creation of a record for a model. We have many methods in odoo for setting a default value to the field.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
A Free 200-Page eBook ~ Brain and Mind Exercise.pptxOH TEIK BIN
(A Free eBook comprising 3 Sets of Presentation of a selection of Puzzles, Brain Teasers and Thinking Problems to exercise both the mind and the Right and Left Brain. To help keep the mind and brain fit and healthy. Good for both the young and old alike.
Answers are given for all the puzzles and problems.)
With Metta,
Bro. Oh Teik Bin 🙏🤓🤔🥰
Brand Guideline of Bashundhara A4 Paper - 2024khabri85
It outlines the basic identity elements such as symbol, logotype, colors, and typefaces. It provides examples of applying the identity to materials like letterhead, business cards, reports, folders, and websites.
2. Disclaimer
“All of the images used in this presentation were searched from
“Google”. Their Copy Rights belong to their Owners. These Images
have only been used for academic Non Profit purpose. Always
acknowledge their Original Source.”
3. DOING A PHD
TOGETHER, WE CAN RISE
Dr. Muhammad Saif Ur Rehman
Green Talent 2014 (Germany)
CAS PIFI Postdoc Fellow 2016
ISESCO-KSA Award 2017
Elsevier-TWAS Award 2018
Member, Global Young Academy 2018
Phd Environmental Engg, KAIST, South Korea
8. ‒ Senior vs Junior
‒ Helping vs Blood sucker
‒ Male vs Female
‒ Research profile
‒ Professional profile
‒ PhD graduates
‒ Funding
‒ Network
‒ Politics
‒ Mentoring
PhD Supervisor
9. ‒ Be lazy
‒ Expect spoon feeding
‒ Bring problems
‒ Joke/forward
‒ Misinform
‒ Skip plan
‒ Be over smart
‒ Love Prof
‒ Work hard
‒ Be proactive
‒ Come with solutions
‒ Bring opportunities
‒ Report
‒ Plan timelines
‒ Educate Prof
‒ Respect Prof
Do
Don’t
Working with Supervisor
10. ‒ Know expectations
‒ Know like/dislike
‒ Decide mode of communication
‒ Decide meeting frequency
‒ Meeting pattern
‒ Agenda
‒ Decision of previous meeting
‒ New results
‒ Decision
‒ Next meeting
Working with Supervisor
If you are proactive, I am active. If you
are active, I am passive. If you are
passive
then you ll graduate on the wedding day
of your 1st kid
15. Literature Search & Review
Literature Search:
– Keywords/Potential topic
– Search engine
– Which journals to read???
– Catalogue
– Law search/Cover Letter/Resignation
• Literature Review:
– Review paper vs Research paper
– How to read a Paper
– Choose a Research Topic
– Research question
– Information scan i.e. Author Guidelines
20. Data Presentation
• Use appropriate Software MS Excel vs Origin
• Prepare experimental data into Graphs/Tables
• Presentable to paper & ppt formats
• Search for Trends/patterns
• Support with Statistical Analysis
• Meaningful data mining ~75%
21. Presentation Design
• Know the Audience
• Use simple & tailored design
• Use animations properly
• Use 1 slide 1 message
• Draw figures with readable information
• Use Master Slide concept
23. Presentation Delivery
• Ensure your script
• Know your time
• Practice, practice & practice
• Maintain Body Language & Voice Quality
• Ensure Hardware & Software
• Fear vs Confidence
24. QA & Feedback
• Leave proper time for QA
• Listen carefully
• Confuse others
• Handle long questions tactfully
• Note shortcomings
• Prepare Checklist
26. Research Paper Writing
• Give a presentation
• Select the Right Journal
• Read/comply with Author Guidelines
• Write in sequence
• Write concisely and properly
• Review/feedback
27. Research Paper Submission
• Cover Letter
• Graphical Abstract
• Compliance
• Reviewers
• PDF review
• Handling Reviewer’s comments
28. Technical & Official Writing
• Project Funding Applications
• Letter to HR/Procurement
• Research Project Reports
• Email
• Lab Policies
32. Leadership
• Resources & Conflicts
• Learn the process & skills
• Lead in low risk environment
• Focus on transition
Leadership
PhD Student
Professor
36. References and Further Reading
1. Sharon Ann Holgate (2017) “The benefits of awards—even if you don’t
win” https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2017/05/benefits-awards-even-
if-you-don-t-win doi:10.1126/science.caredit.a1700044
2. C&EN Media Group (2016). How to Win at Winning Scientific Awards.
https://acsmediakit.org/blog/how-to-win-at-winning-scientific-awards/
3. Salena Rezvani (2014). “How To Go After Awards And Recognition (And
Win)” Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-
progress/2014/11/07/how-to-seek-out-and-win-awards-and-why-it-
matters/#58d32ccb3439
4. Marketing Magazine (2019). “Benefits of Awards – Even if You Don’t Win”
https://marketingmagazine.com.my/benefits-of-awards-even-if-you-dont-
win/