Tweet Your Pubs: How Altmetrics are Changing the Way We Measure Research ImpactRobin Featherstone
Presentation given to the Northern Alberta Health Libraries Association (NAHLA) Trends Mini Conference in Edmonton at the University of Alberta on May 2, 2014
Presented at Case Western Reserve University to the World Health Interest Group meeting.
Briefly describes how various social media tools can be used within the research lab environment
Altmetric: Getting Started with Article-Level MetricsAltmetric
This is a quick-start guide to the insights that may be gained from article-level metrics of scholarly papers. This presentation was authored by Jean Liu (jean@altmetric.com), with data from Euan Adie. Examples from the Altmetric blog (http://www.altmetric.com/blog) are shown. For more information, visit Altmetric (http://www.altmetric.com).
Talk by Jill Emery and Charlie Rapple from ER&L 2015, providing an overview of a subset of the social tools being used by researchers as part of their workflow, and some thoughts on the role of the librarian in supporting researchers' use of these tools.
Insights into Influence: Scholar-Practitioner Profile in the Academy and Comm...Kathleen Reed
Demonstrating knowledge mobilization and accountability are increasingly prominent features of the scholarly landscape; scholar-practitioners need to understand and strategically manage available indicators of impact. At the same time, traditional scholarly metrics and indexing are converging with social media, resulting in new approaches for measuring scholar-practitioner influence. The emerging scene challenges libraries to support scholars, practitioners and students to engage with an evolving environment in which much may be gained or forfeited depending on how reputation is curated. For librarians to assist scholars in this new altmetrics environment, more needs to be known about how students and faculty are or are not engaging with emerging tools available to them. This presentation gives an overview of the considerations, perceptions, and issues related to the use of altmetrics by graduate students and scholar-practitioners at VIU and Royal Roads University.
This document discusses how researchers need to engage more with online social networks to further their careers. It states that a researcher's reputation and visibility is now dependent on how connected their work is through online networks and citations on articles. It emphasizes that social networks now mediate the sharing of information and ideas, so researchers must participate in these spaces to stay relevant and for their work to be discovered.
Tweet Your Pubs: How Altmetrics are Changing the Way We Measure Research ImpactRobin Featherstone
Presentation given to the Northern Alberta Health Libraries Association (NAHLA) Trends Mini Conference in Edmonton at the University of Alberta on May 2, 2014
Presented at Case Western Reserve University to the World Health Interest Group meeting.
Briefly describes how various social media tools can be used within the research lab environment
Altmetric: Getting Started with Article-Level MetricsAltmetric
This is a quick-start guide to the insights that may be gained from article-level metrics of scholarly papers. This presentation was authored by Jean Liu (jean@altmetric.com), with data from Euan Adie. Examples from the Altmetric blog (http://www.altmetric.com/blog) are shown. For more information, visit Altmetric (http://www.altmetric.com).
Talk by Jill Emery and Charlie Rapple from ER&L 2015, providing an overview of a subset of the social tools being used by researchers as part of their workflow, and some thoughts on the role of the librarian in supporting researchers' use of these tools.
Insights into Influence: Scholar-Practitioner Profile in the Academy and Comm...Kathleen Reed
Demonstrating knowledge mobilization and accountability are increasingly prominent features of the scholarly landscape; scholar-practitioners need to understand and strategically manage available indicators of impact. At the same time, traditional scholarly metrics and indexing are converging with social media, resulting in new approaches for measuring scholar-practitioner influence. The emerging scene challenges libraries to support scholars, practitioners and students to engage with an evolving environment in which much may be gained or forfeited depending on how reputation is curated. For librarians to assist scholars in this new altmetrics environment, more needs to be known about how students and faculty are or are not engaging with emerging tools available to them. This presentation gives an overview of the considerations, perceptions, and issues related to the use of altmetrics by graduate students and scholar-practitioners at VIU and Royal Roads University.
This document discusses how researchers need to engage more with online social networks to further their careers. It states that a researcher's reputation and visibility is now dependent on how connected their work is through online networks and citations on articles. It emphasizes that social networks now mediate the sharing of information and ideas, so researchers must participate in these spaces to stay relevant and for their work to be discovered.
Our access to scientific information has changed in ways that were hardly imagined even by the early pioneers of the internet. The immense quantities of data and the array of tools available to search and analyze online content continues to expand while the pace of change does not appear to be slowing. ChemSpider is one of the chemistry community’s primary online public compound databases. Containing tens of millions of chemical compounds and its associated data ChemSpider serves data tens of thousands of chemists every day and it serves as the foundation for many important international projects to integrate chemistry and biology data, facilitate drug discovery efforts and help to identify new chemicals from under the ocean. This presentation will provide an overview of the expanding reach of the ChemSpider platform and the nature of the solutions that it helps to enable. We will also discuss the possibilities it offers in the domain of crowdsourcing and open data sharing. The future of scientific information and communication will be underpinned by these efforts, influenced by increasing participation from the scientific community and facilitated collaboration and ultimately accelerate scientific progress.
Librarians & altmetrics: Tools, tips and use casesLibrary_Connect
Altmetrics are becoming an integral part of looking at the impact and reach of research. Tracking social and online outlets, altmetrics provide quick feedback from a wide range of sources. In this webinar, library experts will discuss how altmetrics work, tools available, and the application of altmetrics in a range of institutions and for various user groups. Watch the webinar: http://ow.ly/vNeax
Altmetrics are here: are you ready to help your faculty? [ALA Research & Stat...Impactstory Team
Scholarship is changing, along with the way we measure impact. This webinar explores altmetrics and the crucial role librarians have in helping faculty navigate these changes.
From Theory to Practice: Can Opennesss Improve the Quality of OER Research? Beck Pitt
This presentation was co-authored with fellow OER Research Hub researchers Bea de los Arcos and Rob Farrow. It was presented at CALRG14 at IET, The Open University (UK) on 10 June 2014.
An updated and revised version of these slides will be presented at OpenEd14 in Washington DC in November 2014.
VIVO conference Aug 2011: The VIVO platform and ORCID in the scholarly identi...Gudmundur Thorisson
A major challenge facing VIVO is the retrieval of published works associated with specific authors from participating institutions, and automated disambiguation & identification of authors and scholarly works. VIVO thus shares many of the same goals as the Open Researcher and Contributor ID not-for-profit organization (ORCID: http://www.orcid.org). ORCID is working to solve the long-standing name ambiguity problem in scholarly communication globally, not only for researchers affiliated with academic institutions, but for contributors to scholarly works of all kinds. The aim of this mini-grant collaborative project is to explore how VIVO and ORCID could interact in the scholarly identity ecosystem, by way of small-scale implementation work and technology evaluation&review. The presentation will provide a brief introduction to ORCID and a background to the project, summarize the technical development undertaken thus far and outline the work remaining, and discuss some possilities for future work beyond this specific short-term project.
Online information 2010_track_two_final_correctedBasset Hervé
Must Libraries Fully Engage with Web 2.0 Without Discernment? The Science Business Case
According some professional magazines, Scientists are leader of the Web 2.0 pack. Many online services appeared on the market for a few years and these technologies would reshape the future of research and science communication. But, at the time being, it is not obvious whether Scientists have really embraced these new services on their daily routine, as the adoption seems to be low. The question for science libraries is to know f they have to invest on wikis and other blogs. How can they choose appropriate tools among dozens of web 2.0's applications? Is it so critical to maintain a presence on social networks? Libraries strategy must consider real impact of web 2.0 in their specific environment before to engage their energy and time.
Developing communities has become increasingly easy on the web as the number of interactive facilities and amount of data available about communities increases. It is possible to view connections on social and professional networks in the form of mathematical graphs. It is also possible to visualise connections between authors of academic papers. For example, Google Scholar, Academia.edu, ResearchGate, and historically Microsoft Academic Search, now have large corpuses of freely available information on publications, together with author and citation details, that can be accessed and presented in a number of ways. Identification of academic authors online is increasingly important too, using facilities such as ORCID. Some practical guidance on what is worthwhile in presenting publication information online will be given.
Open Science & Open Research represents new paradigms in scholarly communication enabled by the web. The document discusses reasons for resistance to open scholarship among academics and provides examples of projects embracing open principles like OpenWetWare, ThoughtMesh, and the Encyclopedia of Life. It contrasts traditional static print-based approaches with "web-enabled" models that are dynamic, interlinked, and support a variety of media like audio and video.
Open access for researchers and research managersIryna Kuchma
Presented at “Gaining the momentum: Open Access and advancement of science and research” workshop, African Digital Scholarship & Curation 2009, Thursday 14 May 2009, CSIR Conference Centre, Pretoria, South Africa. About enlarged audience and citation impact, tenure and promotion. Advanced and enhanced metrics. The evidences that Open Access leads to advancement of science and research.
Scholarly communication: Not just for scholars anymoreJoseph Kraus
This document discusses scholarly communication and open access. It notes that while various organizations push for more open access to research, there are still misunderstandings about open access among scientists, researchers, publishers and librarians. Specifically, some misunderstand behaviors include thinking open access is not needed or that the general public would not understand research articles. The document also discusses how the culture among scientists values traditional peer-reviewed journals and gatekeepers, and is slow to change. It suggests librarians can help address these issues by continuing to observe scientist behaviors and demonstrating the benefits of open access, such as increased citations.
VIVO: enabling the discovery of research and scholarshipPaul Albert
An introduction to VIVO, an open source, semantic web application that enables discovery of research and scholarship across institutions and one library's role in its implementation and development.
This document provides tips for using social media and altmetrics to increase the impact and citation rate of scientific publications. It recommends (1) tweeting about papers within 3 days with relevant hashtags and links, (2) uploading outputs to repositories like Figshare and Slideshare to passively generate traffic, and (3) working with communications teams to promote outputs through blogs, media coverage, and social media. Monitoring tools like Impactstory and Google Scholar can track a publication's citations and discussions online over time.
1) The document discusses using social media as a tool for researchers. It outlines researchers' typical views of social media as time-consuming and irrelevant for professional use.
2) Alternative metrics and scholarly collaboration networks are presented as ways to track attention and discover content online. Examples of metrics for articles are shown.
3) The document concludes with tasks for participants to check their online profiles, consider strategic social media use, and access additional homework materials.
Scholarly Communications in Global PerspectiveNina Collins
Emerging scholars are often unprepared to navigate the changing landscape of scholarly publishing. Learn about author's rights and the importance of strategic publishing, including techniques to identify unethical scholarly publishers.
Rethinking the Functions of a Journal - some case studies from PLoS by Mark P...dduin
The document discusses re-engineering scientific journals to better serve their functions of registration, certification, dissemination and preservation. It describes PLoS's efforts to make scientific literature openly accessible online through journals like PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine. PLoS is working to improve the organization of content by topic and impact, speed up authoring and certification through approaches like PLoS Currents, and cover operating costs through growth in submissions and publications. The goal is to make literature more useful to scientists and the public.
The document summarizes the Chemist's Toolkit for publishing and promoting work online. It discusses open access publishing models, federal funding reporting mandates, retaining rights through author addenda, copyright and creative commons licensing. The toolkit contents are changing as publishing models evolve with new technologies, and it's important to maintain the toolkit by staying aware of developments. Globalization is increasing international collaborations which impacts cultural expectations around publishing.
Reward, reproducibility and recognition in research - the case for going OpenDanny Kingsley
The is a keynote presentation for the Eleventh Annual Munin Conference on Scholarly Publishing http://site.uit.no/muninconf/
21 November 2016
The advent of the internet has meant that scholarly communication has changed immeasurably over the past two decades but in some ways it has hardly changed at all. The coin in the realm of any research remains the publication of novel results in a high impact journal – despite known issues with the Journal Impact Factor. This elusive goal has led to many problems in the research process: from hyperauthorship to high levels of retractions, reproducibility problems and 'cherry picking' of results. The veracity of the academic record is increasingly being brought into question. An additional problem is this static reward systems binds us to the current publishing regime, preventing any real progress in terms of widespread open access or even adoption of novel publishing opportunities. But there is a possible solution. Increased calls to open research up and provide a greater level of transparency have started to yield practical real solutions. This talk will cover the problems we currently face and describe some of the innovations that might offer a way forward.
PLoS - Why It is a Model to be EmulatedPhilip Bourne
The document discusses the Public Library of Science (PLoS) and why it is a model for open access scientific publishing. PLoS was founded to make scientific literature openly accessible. It publishes several open access journals, including PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine, and PLoS ONE, a "mega journal" that publishes scientifically sound research from any field. PLoS aims to drive change in publishing towards open access models and make science more comprehensible. It uses many web tools and operates using a liberal open license to encourage sharing of research.
5 steps to using open access in the classroom 11 9 2011 Elizabeth Brown
The document discusses open educational resources and open content. It begins by outlining limitations to open content and then provides a five step process for creating open content: 1) identify open content, 2) assess the value of information, 3) create open content, 4) share open content with peers, and 5) preserve open content. It then discusses various tools and platforms for creating, sharing, and preserving open content. The document concludes by emphasizing that creating open content is an iterative process and provides additional advice.
This is an updated version of an invited talk I presented at the European Research Council-Brussels (Scientific Seminar): "Love for Science or 'academic prostitution'".
It has been updated to be presented at the The Spanish and Portuguese Relativity Meetings (EREP) on 6th July 2019.
I have included new slides and revised others.
I present a personal revision (sometimes my own vision) of some issues that I consider key for doing Science. It was at the time focused on the expected audience, mainly Scientific Officers with background in different fields of science and scholarship, but also Agency staff.
Abstract: In a recent Special issue of Nature concerning Science Metrics it was claimed that " Research reverts to a kind of 'academic prostitution' in which work is done to please editors and referees rather than to further knowledge."If this is true, funding agencies should try to avoid falling into the trap of their own system. By perpetuating this 'prostitution' they risk not funding the best research but funding the best sold research.
Given the current epoch of economical crisis, where in a quest for funds researchers are forced into competitive game of pandering to panelists, its seems a good time for deep reflection about the entire scientific system.
With this talk I aim to provoke extra critical thinking among the committees who select evaluators, and among the evaluators, who in turn require critical thinking to the candidates when selecting excellent science.
I present some initiatives (e.g. new tracers of impact for the Web era- 'altmetrics'), and on-going projects (e.g. how to move from publishing advertising to publishing knowledge), that might enable us to favor Science over marketing.
Our access to scientific information has changed in ways that were hardly imagined even by the early pioneers of the internet. The immense quantities of data and the array of tools available to search and analyze online content continues to expand while the pace of change does not appear to be slowing. ChemSpider is one of the chemistry community’s primary online public compound databases. Containing tens of millions of chemical compounds and its associated data ChemSpider serves data tens of thousands of chemists every day and it serves as the foundation for many important international projects to integrate chemistry and biology data, facilitate drug discovery efforts and help to identify new chemicals from under the ocean. This presentation will provide an overview of the expanding reach of the ChemSpider platform and the nature of the solutions that it helps to enable. We will also discuss the possibilities it offers in the domain of crowdsourcing and open data sharing. The future of scientific information and communication will be underpinned by these efforts, influenced by increasing participation from the scientific community and facilitated collaboration and ultimately accelerate scientific progress.
Librarians & altmetrics: Tools, tips and use casesLibrary_Connect
Altmetrics are becoming an integral part of looking at the impact and reach of research. Tracking social and online outlets, altmetrics provide quick feedback from a wide range of sources. In this webinar, library experts will discuss how altmetrics work, tools available, and the application of altmetrics in a range of institutions and for various user groups. Watch the webinar: http://ow.ly/vNeax
Altmetrics are here: are you ready to help your faculty? [ALA Research & Stat...Impactstory Team
Scholarship is changing, along with the way we measure impact. This webinar explores altmetrics and the crucial role librarians have in helping faculty navigate these changes.
From Theory to Practice: Can Opennesss Improve the Quality of OER Research? Beck Pitt
This presentation was co-authored with fellow OER Research Hub researchers Bea de los Arcos and Rob Farrow. It was presented at CALRG14 at IET, The Open University (UK) on 10 June 2014.
An updated and revised version of these slides will be presented at OpenEd14 in Washington DC in November 2014.
VIVO conference Aug 2011: The VIVO platform and ORCID in the scholarly identi...Gudmundur Thorisson
A major challenge facing VIVO is the retrieval of published works associated with specific authors from participating institutions, and automated disambiguation & identification of authors and scholarly works. VIVO thus shares many of the same goals as the Open Researcher and Contributor ID not-for-profit organization (ORCID: http://www.orcid.org). ORCID is working to solve the long-standing name ambiguity problem in scholarly communication globally, not only for researchers affiliated with academic institutions, but for contributors to scholarly works of all kinds. The aim of this mini-grant collaborative project is to explore how VIVO and ORCID could interact in the scholarly identity ecosystem, by way of small-scale implementation work and technology evaluation&review. The presentation will provide a brief introduction to ORCID and a background to the project, summarize the technical development undertaken thus far and outline the work remaining, and discuss some possilities for future work beyond this specific short-term project.
Online information 2010_track_two_final_correctedBasset Hervé
Must Libraries Fully Engage with Web 2.0 Without Discernment? The Science Business Case
According some professional magazines, Scientists are leader of the Web 2.0 pack. Many online services appeared on the market for a few years and these technologies would reshape the future of research and science communication. But, at the time being, it is not obvious whether Scientists have really embraced these new services on their daily routine, as the adoption seems to be low. The question for science libraries is to know f they have to invest on wikis and other blogs. How can they choose appropriate tools among dozens of web 2.0's applications? Is it so critical to maintain a presence on social networks? Libraries strategy must consider real impact of web 2.0 in their specific environment before to engage their energy and time.
Developing communities has become increasingly easy on the web as the number of interactive facilities and amount of data available about communities increases. It is possible to view connections on social and professional networks in the form of mathematical graphs. It is also possible to visualise connections between authors of academic papers. For example, Google Scholar, Academia.edu, ResearchGate, and historically Microsoft Academic Search, now have large corpuses of freely available information on publications, together with author and citation details, that can be accessed and presented in a number of ways. Identification of academic authors online is increasingly important too, using facilities such as ORCID. Some practical guidance on what is worthwhile in presenting publication information online will be given.
Open Science & Open Research represents new paradigms in scholarly communication enabled by the web. The document discusses reasons for resistance to open scholarship among academics and provides examples of projects embracing open principles like OpenWetWare, ThoughtMesh, and the Encyclopedia of Life. It contrasts traditional static print-based approaches with "web-enabled" models that are dynamic, interlinked, and support a variety of media like audio and video.
Open access for researchers and research managersIryna Kuchma
Presented at “Gaining the momentum: Open Access and advancement of science and research” workshop, African Digital Scholarship & Curation 2009, Thursday 14 May 2009, CSIR Conference Centre, Pretoria, South Africa. About enlarged audience and citation impact, tenure and promotion. Advanced and enhanced metrics. The evidences that Open Access leads to advancement of science and research.
Scholarly communication: Not just for scholars anymoreJoseph Kraus
This document discusses scholarly communication and open access. It notes that while various organizations push for more open access to research, there are still misunderstandings about open access among scientists, researchers, publishers and librarians. Specifically, some misunderstand behaviors include thinking open access is not needed or that the general public would not understand research articles. The document also discusses how the culture among scientists values traditional peer-reviewed journals and gatekeepers, and is slow to change. It suggests librarians can help address these issues by continuing to observe scientist behaviors and demonstrating the benefits of open access, such as increased citations.
VIVO: enabling the discovery of research and scholarshipPaul Albert
An introduction to VIVO, an open source, semantic web application that enables discovery of research and scholarship across institutions and one library's role in its implementation and development.
This document provides tips for using social media and altmetrics to increase the impact and citation rate of scientific publications. It recommends (1) tweeting about papers within 3 days with relevant hashtags and links, (2) uploading outputs to repositories like Figshare and Slideshare to passively generate traffic, and (3) working with communications teams to promote outputs through blogs, media coverage, and social media. Monitoring tools like Impactstory and Google Scholar can track a publication's citations and discussions online over time.
1) The document discusses using social media as a tool for researchers. It outlines researchers' typical views of social media as time-consuming and irrelevant for professional use.
2) Alternative metrics and scholarly collaboration networks are presented as ways to track attention and discover content online. Examples of metrics for articles are shown.
3) The document concludes with tasks for participants to check their online profiles, consider strategic social media use, and access additional homework materials.
Scholarly Communications in Global PerspectiveNina Collins
Emerging scholars are often unprepared to navigate the changing landscape of scholarly publishing. Learn about author's rights and the importance of strategic publishing, including techniques to identify unethical scholarly publishers.
Rethinking the Functions of a Journal - some case studies from PLoS by Mark P...dduin
The document discusses re-engineering scientific journals to better serve their functions of registration, certification, dissemination and preservation. It describes PLoS's efforts to make scientific literature openly accessible online through journals like PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine. PLoS is working to improve the organization of content by topic and impact, speed up authoring and certification through approaches like PLoS Currents, and cover operating costs through growth in submissions and publications. The goal is to make literature more useful to scientists and the public.
The document summarizes the Chemist's Toolkit for publishing and promoting work online. It discusses open access publishing models, federal funding reporting mandates, retaining rights through author addenda, copyright and creative commons licensing. The toolkit contents are changing as publishing models evolve with new technologies, and it's important to maintain the toolkit by staying aware of developments. Globalization is increasing international collaborations which impacts cultural expectations around publishing.
Reward, reproducibility and recognition in research - the case for going OpenDanny Kingsley
The is a keynote presentation for the Eleventh Annual Munin Conference on Scholarly Publishing http://site.uit.no/muninconf/
21 November 2016
The advent of the internet has meant that scholarly communication has changed immeasurably over the past two decades but in some ways it has hardly changed at all. The coin in the realm of any research remains the publication of novel results in a high impact journal – despite known issues with the Journal Impact Factor. This elusive goal has led to many problems in the research process: from hyperauthorship to high levels of retractions, reproducibility problems and 'cherry picking' of results. The veracity of the academic record is increasingly being brought into question. An additional problem is this static reward systems binds us to the current publishing regime, preventing any real progress in terms of widespread open access or even adoption of novel publishing opportunities. But there is a possible solution. Increased calls to open research up and provide a greater level of transparency have started to yield practical real solutions. This talk will cover the problems we currently face and describe some of the innovations that might offer a way forward.
PLoS - Why It is a Model to be EmulatedPhilip Bourne
The document discusses the Public Library of Science (PLoS) and why it is a model for open access scientific publishing. PLoS was founded to make scientific literature openly accessible. It publishes several open access journals, including PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine, and PLoS ONE, a "mega journal" that publishes scientifically sound research from any field. PLoS aims to drive change in publishing towards open access models and make science more comprehensible. It uses many web tools and operates using a liberal open license to encourage sharing of research.
5 steps to using open access in the classroom 11 9 2011 Elizabeth Brown
The document discusses open educational resources and open content. It begins by outlining limitations to open content and then provides a five step process for creating open content: 1) identify open content, 2) assess the value of information, 3) create open content, 4) share open content with peers, and 5) preserve open content. It then discusses various tools and platforms for creating, sharing, and preserving open content. The document concludes by emphasizing that creating open content is an iterative process and provides additional advice.
This is an updated version of an invited talk I presented at the European Research Council-Brussels (Scientific Seminar): "Love for Science or 'academic prostitution'".
It has been updated to be presented at the The Spanish and Portuguese Relativity Meetings (EREP) on 6th July 2019.
I have included new slides and revised others.
I present a personal revision (sometimes my own vision) of some issues that I consider key for doing Science. It was at the time focused on the expected audience, mainly Scientific Officers with background in different fields of science and scholarship, but also Agency staff.
Abstract: In a recent Special issue of Nature concerning Science Metrics it was claimed that " Research reverts to a kind of 'academic prostitution' in which work is done to please editors and referees rather than to further knowledge."If this is true, funding agencies should try to avoid falling into the trap of their own system. By perpetuating this 'prostitution' they risk not funding the best research but funding the best sold research.
Given the current epoch of economical crisis, where in a quest for funds researchers are forced into competitive game of pandering to panelists, its seems a good time for deep reflection about the entire scientific system.
With this talk I aim to provoke extra critical thinking among the committees who select evaluators, and among the evaluators, who in turn require critical thinking to the candidates when selecting excellent science.
I present some initiatives (e.g. new tracers of impact for the Web era- 'altmetrics'), and on-going projects (e.g. how to move from publishing advertising to publishing knowledge), that might enable us to favor Science over marketing.
This document provides advice and guidance for publishing papers on pedagogic research in academic journals. It discusses common reasons why papers get rejected, benefits of publishing education research, topic ideas, addressing lack of evidence or familiarity with literature, writing style considerations, and suggests suitable journals in biology and other fields.
There is an abundance of free online tools accessible to scientists and others that can be used for online networking, data sharing and measuring research impact. Despite this, few scientists know how these tools can be used or fail to take advantage of using them as an integrated pipeline to raise awareness of their research outputs. In this article, the authors describe their experiences with these tools and how they can make best use of them to make their scientific research generally more accessible, extending its reach beyond their own direct networks, and communicating their ideas to new audiences. These efforts have the potential to drive science by sparking new collaborations and interdisciplinary research projects that may lead to future publications, funding and commercial opportunities. The intent of this article is to: describe some of these freely accessible networking tools and affiliated products; demonstrate from our own experiences how they can be utilized effectively; and, inspire their adoption by new users for the benefit of science.
The document discusses how Web 2.0 tools may impact science communication and the scientific process. It notes that traditionally science was viewed as experts contributing to a fixed body of knowledge, but now tools like wikis and blogs allow for more open and collaborative "science in the making." However, open peer review was not widely adopted. The document also discusses how the internet has allowed the public to engage more with environmentalism and informal science learning, but challenges remain in evaluating online resources and structuring learning.
Science in the context of journals, Open, and the futureBenjamin Laken
The state of science, journals, peer-review, thoughts on Open Science, reproducibility, and Science 2.0.
Accompanying article at https://thewinnower.com/papers/open-evolution-and-revolution-in-science
This document provides guidance for science journalists on how to effectively research, write about, and engage audiences on scientific topics. It discusses challenges in science journalism like the spread of misinformation. The document outlines different models for communicating science to the public and emphasizes building trust by presenting information factually, transparently, and in a way that relates to people's lives. It provides tips for journalists on properly researching and verifying scientific claims by checking the credibility of sources and identifying limitations or biases. The overall goal is to help journalists immerse themselves in research and interact with scientists to produce stories that stimulate public understanding and discussion of important scientific issues.
This document summarizes a tutorial on how scientists share information as part of the science information life cycle. It discusses how scientists communicate new findings through peer-reviewed published articles, conference presentations, and other avenues. It also describes open access and the peer review process, where other scientists evaluate papers submitted to journals before publication to ensure quality and scientific merit. The goal of this sharing and peer review is to advance scientific knowledge and allow progress in science.
Disseminating Scientific Research via Twitter: Research Evidence and Practica...Katja Reuter, PhD
About one-fifth of current scientific papers are being shared on Twitter. With nearly 69 million active U.S. Twitter users (24% of the U.S. adult population) and 328 million monthly active users worldwide, Twitter is one of the biggest social networks worldwide. Understandably, hopes are high that tweets mentioning scientific articles and research findings can reach peers and the general public. Studies show that most of the engagement with scientific papers on Twitter takes place among members of academia and thus reflects visibility within the scientific community rather than impact on society. However, there are ways to reach the broader public. This webinar will provide an overview of using Twitter to reach peers and non-specialist groups, the relationship between tweets and citations, and provide tips for building an academic Twitter presence.
Speaker: Katja Reuter, PhD, Assistant Professor of Clinical Preventive Medicine at the Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research in the Department of Preventive Medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of USC; Director of Digital Innovation and Communication for the Southern California Clinical and Translational Research Institute (SC CTSI).
Learning objectives:
1. Describe the strengths and limitations of using Twitter for the dissemination of scientific research.
2. Describe practical approaches for building an academic presence on Twitter.
3. Describe approaches to identify and reach different audiences on Twitter.
Publishers are caretakers of science. Part of that work is maintaining the integrity of scientific literature. Science builds directly upon past work, so we need to be sure that we are building upon a solid foundation and not faulty research. Publishers need to take an active role in monitoring and tracking faulty, retracted research and its influence. I'm asking publishers to (1) clearly mark retracted papers; (2) alert authors who have already cited a retracted paper; and (3) before publishing an article, check its bibliography for retracted papers.
Retracted papers should be clearly marked everywhere they appear, but today that is not the case. Publishers can also use the CrossRef CrossMark service, which lets readers check for article updates (such as retraction) from a little red ribbon at the top of an article. Checking for citations to retracted articles, and limiting future citations, can help science self-correct by shoring up its foundations.
This is an updated version of an invited talk I presented at the European Research Council-Brussels (Scientific Seminar): "Love for Science or 'academic prostitution'".
It has been updated to be presented at my home institution (Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía - CSIC) in a scientific seminar (14 June 2013).
I have included some new slides and revised others.
I present a personal revision (sometimes my own vision) of some issues that I consider key for doing Science. It was focused on the expected audience, mainly Scientific Officers with background in different fields of science and scholarship, but also Agency staff.
Abstract: In a recent Special issue of Nature concerning Science Metrics it was claimed that " Research reverts to a kind of 'academic prostitution' in which work is done to please editors and referees rather than to further knowledge."If this is true, funding agencies should try to avoid falling into the trap of their own system. By perpetuating this 'prostitution' they risk not funding the best research but funding the best sold research.
Given the current epoch of economical crisis, where in a quest for funds researchers are forced into competitive game of pandering to panelists, its seems a good time for deep reflection about the entire scientific system.
With this talk I aim to provoke extra critical thinking among the committees who select evaluators, and among the evaluators, who in turn require critical thinking to the candidates when selecting excellent science.
I will present some initiatives (e.g. new tracers of impact for the Web era- 'altmetrics'), and on-going projects (e.g. how to move from publishing advertising to publishing knowledge), that might enable us to favor Science over marketing.
Why SoMe - Research context of social media useRob Knight
Presentation given at the NTU Psychology away day 2013 about the use of social media as a research / academic tool and as part of a wider set of skills or literacies often referred to as 'digital literacy'.
This document summarizes Susanna-Assunta Sansone's presentation on open access and open data at Nature Publishing Group. Some key points discussed include:
- The benefits of open data including reducing errors/fraud and increasing return on investment in research. However, barriers also exist such as lack of incentives and standards.
- Recent initiatives at NPG to improve data/reproducibility such as requiring data behind figures and expanding methods sections.
- The role of data journals in increasing credit/visibility for shared data and promoting standards/best practices.
- Market research found researchers want increased visibility, usability, and credit for sharing their data.
Recomendations for infrastructure and incentives for open science, presented to the Research Data Alliance 6th Plenary. Presenter: William Gunn, Director of Scholarly Communications for Mendeley.
The Open Ecosystem: Issues and challenges for Institutional RepositoriesH Anil Kumar
The document discusses the open ecosystem and trends in education, with a focus on institutional repositories (IRs). It outlines the importance of IRs, as well as some of the key issues and challenges they face. These include technology, preservation, impact on scholarship, content types, policies, discoverability, integration, copyright, and metrics. The document then provides details on the IR at the Vikram Sarabhai Library, including usage statistics and technical details. It outlines the library's plans to upgrade its IR software, expand content types like video archives and student projects, and analyze research trends. Finally, it discusses some overall library trends to consider, such as the focus on open access, changing roles, and demand for India-specific
Can Science Blogging Enhance Your Research Life?Katherine Haxton
The document discusses the benefits of science blogging for researchers. It describes what science blogging is, provides examples of popular science blogs, and outlines some of the positives and negatives of engaging in science blogging. Popular science blogs discussed include ResearchBlogging.org, Open Lab Notebook, and Nature Network, which allow sharing of research insights, collaborating with others, and networking in the scientific community. Both private and public forms of online engagement through blogging are examined.
The document provides guidance on communicating scientific research to broader audiences through various online and social media channels. It discusses why scientists should develop an online presence, including to have more direct public engagement and control the narrative around their work. The document also offers tips on managing an online profile, using different channels according to a researcher's career stage, and leveraging images and graphics to enhance communication. Overall, the document aims to help scientists promote the impact and accessibility of their research.
These slides come from a presentation given as part of the session "Learning from the evidence: improving microbiology teaching through educational research" at the Society for General Microbiology conference in Nottingham, September 2010.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...Zilliz
Join us to introduce Milvus Lite, a vector database that can run on notebooks and laptops, share the same API with Milvus, and integrate with every popular GenAI framework. This webinar is perfect for developers seeking easy-to-use, well-integrated vector databases for their GenAI apps.
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...Zilliz
This talk will give hands-on advice on building RAG applications with an open-source Milvus database deployed as a docker container. We will also introduce the integration of Milvus with Snowpark Container Services.
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationZilliz
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Discussing research with the public in the blogosphere
1. Judit Bar-Ilan, Hadas Shema
Dept. Information Science, Bar-Ilan University
and
Mike Thelwall
School of Technology, University of
Wolverhampton
Partially funded by the EU ACUMEN project
2. Blogs, wikis, forums, Twitter,
Facebook, Google+, etc.
User-generated content
Sharing, interacting,
commenting
Can be utilized to involve
the public and to emphasize
the societal impact of
science
Blogosphere map by
Jenna Greenbaum
3. In August 2010, Vijay Deolalikar sent his draft of
proof of the major open question in theoretical
computer science (P≠NP) to a number of CS
people, among them Dick Lipton, who has a
professional blog
In the following days the proof was ―dissected‖
by a huge number of scientists and non-
scientists, and holes in the proof were found.
Deolalikar has withdrawn the draft, and
announced that he will fix these problems. A new
draft has not been submitted yet.
4. A total of 1478 comments, not only by
established CS people
5. ―I, for one, hope that P vs. NP remains open at least
until I graduate. I would be really disappointing if
the biggest open question in my field were solved
‗too soon‘.‖ Hugo
―The internet truly has given us an amazing tool for
collaboration.‖ Joe
―i am not a CS person.‖ Confused
― … We honestly wanted to understand what was
going on in the paper, and figure out if it had a
chance of working. After having spent that time
(and collectively, everyone generated over a
thousand blog comments), we made our
conclusions.‖ Ryan Williams
6. Wolfe-Simeon et al. (2011). A Bacterium That
Can Grow by Using Arsenic Instead of
Phosphorus. Science (published online in
December 2, 2010)
8 comments published by Science on May 27,
2011
Extensively criticized in blogs as summed up
on December 10, 2010
7. One of the major critics, Rosie
Redfield from UBC, published
her reservations on December
4, 2010, and these appear as
one of the comments to the
article in Science magazine
Recently she submitted a
manuscript showing that the
results could not be
reproduced. The paper is on
Arxiv.org
The process of publishing and
publicizing (on Science News)
without the paper first
undergoing peer-review is
criticized by biologist Debbie
Knight in her blog Biologyze
(top result in Google blog
search on March 3, 2012)
8. ―ResearchBlogging.org is a system for
identifying the best, most thoughtful blog
posts about peer-reviewed research‖
Participating bloggers mark their posts that
meet the guidelines and these are aggregated
by Researchblogging.org
Started in 2007
More than 23,000 posts
9. ―Do you write about peer-reviewed research in
your blog? Use ResearchBlogging.org to make it
easy for your readers — and others from around
the world — to find your serious posts about
academic research.‖
―Do you like to read about new developments in
science and other fields? Are you tired of ‗science
by press release‘? ResearchBlogging.org is your
place. ResearchBlogging.org allows readers to
easily find blog posts about serious peer-
reviewed research, instead of just news reports
and press releases.‖
11. 126 non-commercial blogs, authored by one or
two authors, having more than 20 entries posted
at RB during 2010
Reviewed journals based on last five posts in
each blog
―Blog citation‖ – journal referenced in a blog post
in our sample
12.
13. Mostly male (more than 70%)
Have Twitter accounts (75%)
Highly educated:
14. About 14% of the posts in the category during
2010 and 2011 were concerned with e-science
(106 posts out of 747)
Specific topics
◦ Social media use for scientists
◦ Open science, including open access, data sharing
and data archiving
◦ Search tools, reference managers and data mining
◦ Online learning
◦ Science reporting, including peer review and new
forms of publishing
15. Alexa (March 2012)
◦ Researchblogging.org's three-month global Alexa
traffic rank is 337,812.
◦ ―Relative to the overall population of internet
users, this site's audience tends to be users who
have postgraduate educations
◦ They are also disproportionately childless women
aged 25–45 and 55–65 who have incomes between
$60,000 and $100,000 and browse from work.‖
16. The examples presented emphasize the
need to study and understand the effects
of
◦ discussing and sharing scientific results on
the Internet
with the public
with peers
◦ the power of crowdsourcing
Some warn against science blogging
(credibility, qualification). See:
◦ Murray R (2010). Science Blogs and Caveat
Emptor. Analytical chemistry
Editor's Notes
In this talk we concentrate on the use of blogs
Arsenic Bacteria link-dump by Bora Zivkovic, see http://blog.coturnix.org/2010/12/07/arsenic-bacteria-link-dump/