Download to read offline
Uploaded byIngrid Melve
Digital Assessments, on Campus and Networks
The document discusses a national initiative in Norway aimed at transitioning the assessment process in higher education from manual to digital systems, involving collaboration among multiple universities and colleges. It outlines the goals, challenges, and necessary infrastructure for implementing digital exams, as well as the need for standardization and integration of various software solutions. Key aspects include addressing security concerns, establishing workflows, and preparing for large-scale testing and joint procurement efforts in 2016.
More Related Content
Similar to Digital Assessments, on Campus and Networks
Digital Assessments, on Campus and Networks
- 1. Digital assessments ashared solution Ingrid Melve, NORDUnet2014, Uppsala, 2014-09-24
- 4. Digital assessment andexam day 4 eCampus: national program for video, collaboration tools and IT architecture for flexible higher education UNINETT, the Norwegian research network Building infrastructure, supporting inter-institutional ICT DIGG: digital exam systems development project 8 universities, 15 university colleges and UNNETT Specifications for digital exam: rooms, security, integration etc Multiple vendors develop software and help in testing Aiming for joint procurement in 2016
- 6. 2014-06-20 6 High level expert group eCampus project Local pilots Digital assessment for all students ASAP
- 7. Project goals 7 Technical solution for exams Defining needs, standardization Working with vendors to develop solutions Large scale roll-out: live test Change ”school” exams 23 universities and colleges Students get text processing tools Change room requirements Change workflow Kill paper for millions of exams per semester National mandate: find solution
- 8. Assessment process: Frommanual to digital routines Prepare Examination Grading Feedback on grade and complaints Locality Candidate Examination / questions Medium Answers Status Info Journal Digital Manual Digital Digital Digital Manual Manual Manual FS Examination - registry System for register examinations Formalities Overviewt,e.g. language-variants Shortage, reminders Archiving: Need of history archiving. Critical: Access FS Answers Systems for digital exam Challenges: •Control access •Scaling •Context •Infrastructur •Costs •Competence Critical: Stability FS System for digital censorship -Process support -Transparent censorship Support for varying methodology Critical: Access, Security, Transfer results. In general: •Must support digital og manualroutines •Access to systems. People with loose connection to institution •Digital signatures •Clarify regulations •Different forms of assessment •Role of Learning Management Systems •Hand over information to internal and national archives Need for system support. Case management system Integration with archive system Archiv e Inform the students Ministry of Education (DBH) Norwegian State Education Loan Fund Figure by NTNU
- 9. First time wedo 9 Digitalization and dematerialization of exam process Policy alignment for assessment, at practical level BYOD for critical situations Integration of multiple components for assessments
- 10. Pre-commercial Procurement (PCP) 10 Behov Dialog Konkurranse Leveranse Needs Dialog Competition Delivery http://www.innova-eu.net/docs/pcp17.pdf
- 12. Workflow 12 Digitalprocess Supported by FS (shared student registry) Principals Teacher, reviewer, grading teacher Study administration, library etc Student Green IT, remove paper
- 14. How does itplay together? 14 Architecture What is the framework and expectations? Best Current Practice Aligning practice from multiple institutions Testing integrations/APIs
- 16. Integration 16 Sharedextract Who are the candidates? Who are grading exams? What are the grades? Transparency and complaints Workflow handover to other systems: archive, student registry etc
- 18. Integration (gory details) 18 Establish integration point (Mule) Define APIs for exam info Test with multiple vendors Adjust APIs Harden integration point Test, test, test, test Exam systems Student registry Calendar, room planning Check plagiarism Grading system Case processing system (complaints) Archive
- 19. BYOD – student´sstuff 19 Software requirements Hardware requirements Practical stuff Must have 5-15% PCs to lend to students Power supply Security aspects Specifications and good practice documentation
- 20. Examination rooms 20 Power Wifi Do you see the screen? Security inspections BCP document in draft Publish in November
- 24. Next steps 24 Large scale testing 15% digital for 2015 60% for 2016 Best Current Practice docs National alignment of practices Develop software (vendors) Development contracts Paperwork and procurement rules Joint procurement Q1 2016
Editor's Notes
- #9 Prepare: When the professor is starting his work on preparing an assessment paper, he should be able to work digitally. He should be able to co work with his college professor, and they should be able to share the document I “real time” Maybe it exists a “national repository” of e-learning objects (for example a video) and there might be a repository of premade questions When the professor(s) is done, normally the paper must be controlled and approved before it is distributed on. The assessment paper must then be digitally distributed to the examination office, who are responsible for the execution of the actual examination. Examination It exists a multiple variation on how to execute an exam But the main purpose is to ensure that the student give a digital alternative for digital assessment A universal design and inclusive learning environments to ensure accessibility for students with disabilities. Grading: The professor and his co-censor should be able to work with the same answer, separately at the same time. Feedback and complains: Must be integrated with the archive system Challenges due to; Security, Control access, Scaling, operational stability, Context, Infrastructure, Cost, Competence, Need for support * The Common Student System (Felles studentsystem FS) is a study administration system developed for universities, scientific colleges and national university colleges. FS is developed by the University Center of Information Technology (USIT), University of Oslo. FS is the sole study administration system for universities and national university colleges in Norway. It is utilized by 51 institutions, including all Norwegian universities, all national university colleges, the Police College, the Defense Colleges, and several private colleges as well as the Norwegian Universities and Colleges Admission Service (NUCAS) [Samordna opptak]. FS is the only study administration system that supports the NUCAS admissions process.
- #11 All Norwegian Universities still need more knowledge and understanding about needs and required functionality to handle digital assessment. So instead of doing a traditional procurement process, and signing up contract with some vendors for buying a defined system, we are looking into a so called Pre-commercial Procurement process