Submitted to :
Presented by-
.
2
•Detectability of mutations is a function of
their effect on the phenotype
• The likelihood of a given mutation being
detected is a function of a variety of
factors,
• All of which reflect the fact that one
detects only those mutations that
display a sufficiently altered phenotype
• UV. An inspection of the genetic code
will show that the majority of these will
cause the substitution of one amino
acid for another
3
4
 The mutations that cause such
amino acid changes are termed
missense mutations
 It is particularly common for
temperature conditional mutants
to have significant amounts of
activity under the non-permissive
condition.
 The following arguments will
suggest the ways in which a
partial loss of a product function
would affect the phenotype and
therefore the detectability of the
mutant.
5
 Mutations induced due to
radiations or due to
chemicals could be
broadly of two types - (i)
lethal mutations,
 (ii) visible mutations. Both
these types could be
located either on sex
chromosomes or on
autosomes .
 his method involves use of a ClB stock which carries
 (i) an inversion in heterozygous state to work as
crossover suppressor (C),
 (ii) a recessive lethal (l) on X-chromosome in heterozygous state,
and
 (iii) a dominant marker, Barred (B)for the barred eye.
 One of the two X-chromosomes in a female fly carried all these three
features and the other X-chromosome was normal.
 Male flies irradiated for induction of mutations were crossed
to ClB females. Male progeny receiving ClB X-chromosome will die
6
20YY 20YY
GrowthShowsSales
7
8
 The methods described in the preceding section were meant for
detection of sex linked lethals.
 For detection of sex linked visible mutations, Muller-5 and
attached X-chromosomes were used. The attached X females
(XXY) have a special advantage.
 When these females are crossed to an irradiated male, X-
chromosome of irradiated male goes either to superfemale
daughters or to the sons.
 Since in sons there is a single X-chromosome, any visible
induced mutation will immediately express itself and can be
easily scored
9
 Mutation occurring in microorganism can be detected and
efficiently isolated from the parent organism of other mutants.
 While studying we must be aware of wild type characters
of an organism ,so the mutants can easily detected.
 In bacteria and other haploid microorganism, the detection
system are straight forward because any new allele should
be observed immediately.
10
 Replica plating technique.
 Resistance selection method.
 Substrate utilization method.
 Ames method
11
 Joshua and Esther Ledgerberg (1952) developed a new
technique called replica plating .
 This technique is used to detect auxotrophic mutants and
wild type strains on the basis of ability to grow in the absence
of amino acids.
 Also this test is used to demonstrate the presence of
antibiotic resistance in bacterial cultures prior to exposure of
antibiotic
12
 Generate the mutants by treating a culture with a mutagen
e.g.nitrosoguanidine .
 Inoculate a plate containing complete growth medium and
incubate it at proper temperature. Both wild type and mutant
survivors will from complete medium.
 This plate containing complete medium is called master
plate.
13
 Prepare a piece of sterile velvet and gently on the upper
surface of the master plate to pick up bacterial cell from each
colony.
 As pressed the master plate, again gently press the velvet
on the replica plates containing complete medium in one set
and lacking cine in only leucine in the other set.
 Thus, the bacterial cells are transferred in replica plates in
the same position as in master plate.
 Incubate the plates and compare the replica plate with
master plate for bacterial colony not growing on replica plate.
14
15
 This is another method used for isolation of mutants.
 Generally the wild the wild type cells not resistant
either to antibiotics or bacteriophage.
 Therefore, it is possible to grow the bacterium in the
presence of agent.
 This method is applied for isolation of mutants resistant
to chemical compounds that can be amended in agar,
phage resistant mutants.
16
 This method is employed in the selection of bacteria. Several
bacteria utilize only a few carbon sources.
 The cultures are plated on to medium containing alternate
carbon sources.
 Any colony that grows on medium can use the substrate and are
possibly mutants. These can be isolated.
 Sugar utilization mutants are also isolated by means of color
indicator plates.
 EMB medium is used for this purpose.
 This medium contain lactose sugar as carbon source and
complete mixture of amino acids. 17
18
 Therefore both lactose wild type and lactose mutant
cells can grow and form colonies on EMB agar plates.
 The lac+ cells catabolize lactose and secrete
acids,therefore the pH of the medium decreases. This will
result in staining of colony to dark purple.
On the other hand, Lac- cells are unable to utilize
lactose and use some of the amino acids as carbon
source.
After utilization of amino acid, ammonia is produced that
increases the pH and de colorize the dye resulting in
white colony.
 Ames test In 1974 Bruce Ames developed a method for
evaluating the potential of chemical to cause cancer, known
as Ames test .
 Ames test is based on the principle that both cancer and
mutations results from the damage of DNA, and results of
experiments have demonstrated that 90% of known
carcinogen are also mutagens.
 Several species of salmonella typhimurium are employed.
Each strain contains a different mutation in the operon
histidine biosynthesis
19
 Prepare the culture of Salmonella histidine
auxotrophs (His-).
 Mix the bacterial cells and test substance(
mutagen) in dilute molten top agar with a small
amount of histidine in one set, and control with
cmplete medium plus large amount of histidine .
 Pour the molten mix on the top of minimal agar
plates and incubate at 37°C for 2-3 days.
20
 Until histidine is depleted all the His- cells will grow
in the presence of test mutagen.
 When the histidine is completely exhausted only
the revertants will grow on the plate.
 The number of spontaneous revertants is low,
whereas the number of revertant induced by
carcinogen is quite high.
 High number of colonies represent the greater
mutagenicity.
21
22
 . Microbial Genetics” by John Cronan and
David Freifelder
 “Microbial Genetics (Jones and Bartlett Series
in Biology)” by Stanley Maloy and John Cronan
23
24

DETECTION AND ISOLATION

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    •Detectability of mutationsis a function of their effect on the phenotype • The likelihood of a given mutation being detected is a function of a variety of factors, • All of which reflect the fact that one detects only those mutations that display a sufficiently altered phenotype • UV. An inspection of the genetic code will show that the majority of these will cause the substitution of one amino acid for another 3
  • 4.
    4  The mutationsthat cause such amino acid changes are termed missense mutations  It is particularly common for temperature conditional mutants to have significant amounts of activity under the non-permissive condition.  The following arguments will suggest the ways in which a partial loss of a product function would affect the phenotype and therefore the detectability of the mutant.
  • 5.
    5  Mutations induceddue to radiations or due to chemicals could be broadly of two types - (i) lethal mutations,  (ii) visible mutations. Both these types could be located either on sex chromosomes or on autosomes .
  • 6.
     his methodinvolves use of a ClB stock which carries  (i) an inversion in heterozygous state to work as crossover suppressor (C),  (ii) a recessive lethal (l) on X-chromosome in heterozygous state, and  (iii) a dominant marker, Barred (B)for the barred eye.  One of the two X-chromosomes in a female fly carried all these three features and the other X-chromosome was normal.  Male flies irradiated for induction of mutations were crossed to ClB females. Male progeny receiving ClB X-chromosome will die 6 20YY 20YY GrowthShowsSales
  • 7.
  • 8.
    8  The methodsdescribed in the preceding section were meant for detection of sex linked lethals.  For detection of sex linked visible mutations, Muller-5 and attached X-chromosomes were used. The attached X females (XXY) have a special advantage.  When these females are crossed to an irradiated male, X- chromosome of irradiated male goes either to superfemale daughters or to the sons.  Since in sons there is a single X-chromosome, any visible induced mutation will immediately express itself and can be easily scored
  • 9.
  • 10.
     Mutation occurringin microorganism can be detected and efficiently isolated from the parent organism of other mutants.  While studying we must be aware of wild type characters of an organism ,so the mutants can easily detected.  In bacteria and other haploid microorganism, the detection system are straight forward because any new allele should be observed immediately. 10
  • 11.
     Replica platingtechnique.  Resistance selection method.  Substrate utilization method.  Ames method 11
  • 12.
     Joshua andEsther Ledgerberg (1952) developed a new technique called replica plating .  This technique is used to detect auxotrophic mutants and wild type strains on the basis of ability to grow in the absence of amino acids.  Also this test is used to demonstrate the presence of antibiotic resistance in bacterial cultures prior to exposure of antibiotic 12
  • 13.
     Generate themutants by treating a culture with a mutagen e.g.nitrosoguanidine .  Inoculate a plate containing complete growth medium and incubate it at proper temperature. Both wild type and mutant survivors will from complete medium.  This plate containing complete medium is called master plate. 13
  • 14.
     Prepare apiece of sterile velvet and gently on the upper surface of the master plate to pick up bacterial cell from each colony.  As pressed the master plate, again gently press the velvet on the replica plates containing complete medium in one set and lacking cine in only leucine in the other set.  Thus, the bacterial cells are transferred in replica plates in the same position as in master plate.  Incubate the plates and compare the replica plate with master plate for bacterial colony not growing on replica plate. 14
  • 15.
  • 16.
     This isanother method used for isolation of mutants.  Generally the wild the wild type cells not resistant either to antibiotics or bacteriophage.  Therefore, it is possible to grow the bacterium in the presence of agent.  This method is applied for isolation of mutants resistant to chemical compounds that can be amended in agar, phage resistant mutants. 16
  • 17.
     This methodis employed in the selection of bacteria. Several bacteria utilize only a few carbon sources.  The cultures are plated on to medium containing alternate carbon sources.  Any colony that grows on medium can use the substrate and are possibly mutants. These can be isolated.  Sugar utilization mutants are also isolated by means of color indicator plates.  EMB medium is used for this purpose.  This medium contain lactose sugar as carbon source and complete mixture of amino acids. 17
  • 18.
    18  Therefore bothlactose wild type and lactose mutant cells can grow and form colonies on EMB agar plates.  The lac+ cells catabolize lactose and secrete acids,therefore the pH of the medium decreases. This will result in staining of colony to dark purple. On the other hand, Lac- cells are unable to utilize lactose and use some of the amino acids as carbon source. After utilization of amino acid, ammonia is produced that increases the pH and de colorize the dye resulting in white colony.
  • 19.
     Ames testIn 1974 Bruce Ames developed a method for evaluating the potential of chemical to cause cancer, known as Ames test .  Ames test is based on the principle that both cancer and mutations results from the damage of DNA, and results of experiments have demonstrated that 90% of known carcinogen are also mutagens.  Several species of salmonella typhimurium are employed. Each strain contains a different mutation in the operon histidine biosynthesis 19
  • 20.
     Prepare theculture of Salmonella histidine auxotrophs (His-).  Mix the bacterial cells and test substance( mutagen) in dilute molten top agar with a small amount of histidine in one set, and control with cmplete medium plus large amount of histidine .  Pour the molten mix on the top of minimal agar plates and incubate at 37°C for 2-3 days. 20
  • 21.
     Until histidineis depleted all the His- cells will grow in the presence of test mutagen.  When the histidine is completely exhausted only the revertants will grow on the plate.  The number of spontaneous revertants is low, whereas the number of revertant induced by carcinogen is quite high.  High number of colonies represent the greater mutagenicity. 21
  • 22.
  • 23.
     . MicrobialGenetics” by John Cronan and David Freifelder  “Microbial Genetics (Jones and Bartlett Series in Biology)” by Stanley Maloy and John Cronan 23
  • 24.