The document discusses the linguistic concept of deixis. It defines deixis as referring to elements in language, such as pronouns and demonstratives, whose meaning is dependent on the context of the utterance. These deictic elements encode aspects of the utterance situation, such as the identities of the speaker and addressee, their location and the time. The document outlines different types of deixis, including person, place, time, discourse and social deixis. It also discusses philosophical approaches to analyzing indexical expressions and how context is important for interpreting utterances containing deictic elements.
Pragmatics and Discourse , context & speech actsNaeemIqbal88
Pragmatics and Discourse
What is pragmatics?
An approach within DA which concentrates on the way language
acquires meaning in use. It has developed from the tradition of the
philosophy of language known as pragmatics.
Focus: The study of contextualised meaning and is concerned with
describing the principles that underlie how we interpret the meaning
behind words: how we get from what we say to what we mean.
Pragmatic approaches tend to be interested in the 'big picture': trying
to formulate generalisable principles about how people produce and
interpret discourse (eg’ the use of humour in business meetings’).
Context
Context is an important concept in DA. Language does not take place in a vacuum and we
need to consider the context in which it occurs in order to understand it.
However, this seemingly unproblematic statement masks the issues and debates that are
ongoing in discourse analysis around the concept of context and its significance.
Two types of context
The 'intrinsic' or 'linguistic' context which refers to information that can be found
within the text that surrounds the language that is being analysed at a particular
moment. It is generally agreed that this type of context is not only useful but essential.
The more problematic type of context lies outside the actual text: what is sometimes
called 'extrinsic' (Schegloff 1997) or 'experiential' context.
This refers to all sorts of information about setting, situation, social circumstances of the
participants such as age, gender, ethnicity and possibly also about the shared
background knowledge and assumptions of the participants.
So, in the example:
'Later, an item about vasectomy and the results of the do-it-yourself competition'
(from Cameron 2001:12)
 The issue with extrinsic context is moving from description to interpretation in
research. Along with describing 'what' is happening in the discourse , it is also
important to interpret 'why' it is happening.
 Extrinsic contextual evidence can be potentially very useful in discussing why
participants say a particular thing in a particular way at a particular time,
however, there is also a danger of 'reading too much into the text' and of
judging which out of many possible interpretations is the 'right' one.
For instance, if the analyst is aware of gender, age or ethic difference among
discourse participants, these variables may well appear to influence the
discourse but how do we know which of these particular variables are
important to the participants in an particular communicative event.
 This is not to say that we should ignore extrinsic context but to suggest that we
need to be cautious about what we select as significant and rigorous about how
we incorporate it into our analyses. Schegloff (1997) advises that the best
option is to use only what can be shown to be relevant to participants.
 Can you imagine a meaningful context for this text?
a. Which of you was the prawns?
Pragmatics and Discourse , context & speech actsNaeemIqbal88
Pragmatics and Discourse
What is pragmatics?
An approach within DA which concentrates on the way language
acquires meaning in use. It has developed from the tradition of the
philosophy of language known as pragmatics.
Focus: The study of contextualised meaning and is concerned with
describing the principles that underlie how we interpret the meaning
behind words: how we get from what we say to what we mean.
Pragmatic approaches tend to be interested in the 'big picture': trying
to formulate generalisable principles about how people produce and
interpret discourse (eg’ the use of humour in business meetings’).
Context
Context is an important concept in DA. Language does not take place in a vacuum and we
need to consider the context in which it occurs in order to understand it.
However, this seemingly unproblematic statement masks the issues and debates that are
ongoing in discourse analysis around the concept of context and its significance.
Two types of context
The 'intrinsic' or 'linguistic' context which refers to information that can be found
within the text that surrounds the language that is being analysed at a particular
moment. It is generally agreed that this type of context is not only useful but essential.
The more problematic type of context lies outside the actual text: what is sometimes
called 'extrinsic' (Schegloff 1997) or 'experiential' context.
This refers to all sorts of information about setting, situation, social circumstances of the
participants such as age, gender, ethnicity and possibly also about the shared
background knowledge and assumptions of the participants.
So, in the example:
'Later, an item about vasectomy and the results of the do-it-yourself competition'
(from Cameron 2001:12)
 The issue with extrinsic context is moving from description to interpretation in
research. Along with describing 'what' is happening in the discourse , it is also
important to interpret 'why' it is happening.
 Extrinsic contextual evidence can be potentially very useful in discussing why
participants say a particular thing in a particular way at a particular time,
however, there is also a danger of 'reading too much into the text' and of
judging which out of many possible interpretations is the 'right' one.
For instance, if the analyst is aware of gender, age or ethic difference among
discourse participants, these variables may well appear to influence the
discourse but how do we know which of these particular variables are
important to the participants in an particular communicative event.
 This is not to say that we should ignore extrinsic context but to suggest that we
need to be cautious about what we select as significant and rigorous about how
we incorporate it into our analyses. Schegloff (1997) advises that the best
option is to use only what can be shown to be relevant to participants.
 Can you imagine a meaningful context for this text?
a. Which of you was the prawns?
The success of a conversation depends on the cooperation between interlocutors. Grice (1975) proposes the cooperative principle (CP) as a guidance between the speakers and listeners in conversational interactions. When people are able to fulfill the CP is called observance of maxim. Observance of maxim categorized into four maxims.
FEEL FREE TO USE IT!
Micro and Macro pragmatic.
Prepared by English majoring students of Pamulang University (Universitas).
Hope you can get inspired and able to take some references from our entertaining slide.
The success of a conversation depends on the cooperation between interlocutors. Grice (1975) proposes the cooperative principle (CP) as a guidance between the speakers and listeners in conversational interactions. When people are able to fulfill the CP is called observance of maxim. Observance of maxim categorized into four maxims.
FEEL FREE TO USE IT!
Micro and Macro pragmatic.
Prepared by English majoring students of Pamulang University (Universitas).
Hope you can get inspired and able to take some references from our entertaining slide.
Hi Guys.. This is the best presentation on Text Linguistics... I have spend 9 hours with my friend Aitsam Haider to make it excellent for all of us. Insha Allah after reading it your concept about linguistics will be quit Clear....
A Try For Best material on Text Linguistics from The Students of Institute of Southern Punjab Multan M.A English 3rd semester...
Hi Guys.. I think No one has done such a great work on text linguistics on the whole.. Me and My friend Asif has done almost 9 hour work to make it Excellent.. Guys read it and you will get all the Text Linguistics concepts in it. Insha Allah..
Deixis is a technical term (from Greek) for one of the most basic things we do with utterances (Yule, 1996, p. 9). It means “pointing via” language. Any linguistic form used to accomplish this “pointing” is called a deictic expression. Deictic expressions are also sometimes called indexical.
----------------------------------------------------------
Fell free to use this PPt.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2. The Deixis term is borrowed from the Greek word for
pointing or indicating and has as prototypical or focal
exemplars the use of demonstratives, person pronouns,
tense, specific time and place adverbs, and a variety of
grammatical features tied directly to the circumstances of
utterance.
3. Deixis also concerns ways in which the interpretation
of utterances depend on the analysis of that context of utterance.
Deixis concerns
Context of utterance
Or
Speech event
4. The facts of deixis should act as a constant reminder to theoretical linguists of the simple but
immensely important fact that natural languages are primarily designed, so to speak, for use in
face-to-face interaction, and thus there are limits to the extent to which they can be analyzed
without taking this into account (Lyons, 1977a: 589ff).
The importance of deictic information for the interpretation of utterances is perhaps best
illustrated by what happens when such information is lacking (Fillmore, 1975: 381).
5. Example
I'll be back in an hour
In this utterance we cannot now when the speaker will be back
because we do not know when it was written.
Listen, I'm not disagreeing with you but with you, and not about this
but about this
Or, suppose we find a bottle in the sea, and inside it a message
which reads;
Meet me here a week from now with a stick about this big
7. Deixis belongs within the domain of pragmatics, because it directly
concerns the relationship between the structure of languages and
the contexts in which they are used.
8. The Important Point
The important point, wherever the pragmatics/semantics boundary
is drawn, is that deixis concerns the encoding of many different
aspects of the circumstances surrounding the utterance, within the
utterance itself. Natural language utterances are thus 'anchored‘
directly to aspects of the context.
9. Philosophical approaches
The topic of deixis, or as philosophers usually prefer, indexical expressions (or just indexicals),
may be usefully approached by considering how truth-conditional semantics deals with certain
natural language expressions. Suppose we identify the semantic content of a sentence with its
truth conditions, then the semantic content of
◦ Letizia de Ramolino was the mother of Napoleon
Then suppose we try to analyze:
◦ I am the mother of Napoleon
10. See these following example
You are the mother of Napoleon
This is an eighteenth-century man-trap
Mary is in love with that fellow over there
It is now 12.15
11. Sentences that contain such expressions and whose truth
values therefore depend on certain facts about the context of utterance
(identity of speakers, addressees, indicated objects, places and times,
etc.), are not of course in any way special or peculiar. For just about
every utterance has this context-dependency, due in no small part (at
least in many languages) to tense. For example:
There is a man on Mars
There was a man on Mars
12. Questions of Philosophical Interest
1. Whether all indexical expressions can be reduced to a single primary one?
2. Whether this final pragmatic residue can be translated out into some eternal context-free
artificial language?
According to Rusell the reduction in the first question was possible, by translating all indexicals (
or as he preferred, egocentric particulars) into expressions containing this, where the latter
referred to a subjective experience. The pronoun I would thus be rendered 'the person who is
experiencing this' (for severe difficulties with such a view, see Gale, 1968). Moreover, according
to Reichnbach, in relation with the second question, all indexicals involve an element of token-
reflexivity, i.e. refer to themselves, so that, for example, I means 'the person who is uttering this
token of the word I'. This view may be initially attractive, but it has many difficulties (Gale,
1968).
13. Examples
There are indeed token-reflexive or self-referring expression is
natural languages as the following:
This sentence contains five words
I hereby apologize
14. The syntax and semantics of classical logics (say, first order predicate calculus) make no such
provision. How should indexicals be accommodated, so that the notion of logical consequence,
as it applies for example to the inference as follows:
John Henry McTavitty is six feet tall and weighs zoo potrnds
John Henry McTavitty is six feet tall
I am six feet tall and weigh 2oo pounds
I am six feet tall
15. One way in which we can accommodate context-relativity is to say that
the proposition expressed by a sentence in a context is a function from
possible worlds and that context to truth values. A context will here
be a set of pragmatic indices, co-ordinates or reference points
(as they are variously called) for speakers, addressees, times of
utterance, places of utterance, indicated objects, and whatever else is
Needed.
16. The man drinking champagne is Lord Godolphin
The man who can lift this stone is stronger than an ox
The first would most naturally have a referential use, where the description might in fact be
wrong (e.g. the man is actually drinking lemonade) but the reference succeed in any case; the
second would most naturally have an attributive use where the speaker would not have any
particular individual in mind (we could paraphrase the second utterance ‘whoever can lift this
stone is stronger than an ox '). But in many cases an utterance is potentially ambiguous between
these two usages. It is the speaker's intention and the addressee's successful location of the
intended referent that matter in the first usage, not the exactaptness of the description, so that
we could call this usage speaker reference (as opposed to semantic reference; Donnellan,
1978;Kaplan, l978).
17. Descriptive Approach
• Involve a series of categories of descriptive nature of deixis.
• The proponents: Buhler , Frei, Fillmore, and Lyons (summarized and systematized in the last
two proponents’ works).
• Traditional categories: person, place, time deixis.
• Add: discourse (text) deixis and social deixis.
18. Person Deixis
• The role of participants
• First person, second person, third person
Place Deixis
• Spatial locations relative to the location
• Proximal, distal
Time Deixis
• Temporal points and spans relative to the time
• Coding time (CT)
Discourse Deixis
• The text referring expression
• That, this
Social Deixis
• Relative social distinction to participant-roles
• Social relationship between speaker and addressee (s)
• Honorifics
20. Different usage of deictic terms
Deictic usage
Gestural
can only be interpreted with the reference to an audio-visual-tactile, and in
general a physical, monitoring of the speech event
Symbolic
Require for interpretation only knowledge of the basic spatio-temporal parameters
of the speech event
Non-deictic usage
Non-anaphoric
The use of word to introduce someone or something that is more fully identified
later
Anaphoric
The word, typically a pronoun, used to maintain reference to someone or
something already mentioned
21. Person Deixis
We have to consider about possible participant roles, so that we can then see how, and
to what extent, these roles are grammaticalized in different languages. The framework:
The speaker or spokesman can be distinct from the source of an utterance
The recipient distinct from the target
The hearers or bystanders distinct from addressees or targets
The basic grammatical distinctions are then categorized into first, second, and third
person.
22. Time deixis
Time deixis makes ultimate reference to participant-role, so it is important to
distinguish the moment of utterance or coding time (CT) from the moment of
reception or receiving time (RT). (Levinson, 1983:73).
The deictic time adverbs in English refers to words and phrases like now,
then, today, yesterday, tomorrow, next week, last year, in three days, etc. Now
is a proximal term, as it indicates the time at which the speaker is producing
the utterance, as in (53), Then is a distal expression which applies to both past
and future time relative to the time of speaking, as in (55) .
(53) Pull the trigger now!
(54) I’m now working on a PhD
(55) I was just a kid then
Fillmore (1975) notes, these have two kinds of referent: they can either refer
to the entire span itself, as in (56), or to a point within the relevant span, as in
(57):
(56) Tomorrow is Wednesday
23. The deictic words yesterday,today, and tomorrow pre-emptive the calendrical. Thus the following said on
Thursday, can only be referring to next Thrusday, otherwise the speaker should have said today:
(58) I’ll see you on Thursday
The same holds if it is said on Wednesday, due to pre-emptive tomorrow.
In the application of next to calendrical names of days, an ambiguity arises: next Thursday can refer either to the
Thirsday of the week that succeeds the week that includes CT, or that Thursday that first follows CT.
Example: A Friday or a Saturday, these will coincide; and given the rule that today and tomorrow pre-empt
calendrical day names, on Wednesday and Thursday, next thursday can only mean the thursday of next week.
Time deixis is relevant to various other deictic elements in a language. Thus greetings are usually time-restricted,
so that
(64) Good morning
Can only be used in the morning.
(65) Good night
Can only be used as a parting
24. Place deixisPlace deixis: specifies the locations relative to the speech event. Here and there are two pure place
deictic words in contemporary English and the demonstrative pronouns this and that. The concept
of distance is implied in them as well as in other words which have spatial deictic sense.
1. place deixis refers to proximity to or distance from the speaker.
These can be single words such as here, there , this , that
Example : Bring that here and Take this there
The words This and here (called proximal terms) are used when something is close to the speaker; that
and there (called distal terms) are used when something is away from the speaker.
2. … and words/expressions referring to direction and/or movement toward or away from the speaker.
Such as to my left, under the carpet, go, take, bring.
Example: When I’m in the office, you can come to see me.
Where come glosses as ‘movement towards the location of the speaker at the time of some other specific
event
25. The non-deictic conceptual organization of space includes:
All those distinctions between surfaces, spaces, enclosures, containers and so on, and
between fronts, backs tops, sides of objects. For example:
(77) This side of the box
Can mean ‘the surface of the box that can be called a side which is nearest to the location of
the speaker, but:
(78) This side of the tree
Simply means ‘that area of the tree visible from the point where the speaker (or the space
between that area and that point).
(79) The cat behind the car
Where behind can have either a deictic usage (i.e. The car intervenes between the cat and
speaker’s location), or a non deictic usage (i.e. The cat is at the intrinsic rear-end of the car).
(80) Bob is the man to the left of mark
Where Bob may be to Mark’s own left (non-deictic), or to the left from the speaker’s point of
view (deictic).
26. 4. DISCOURSE DEIXIS
CONCERNS THE USE OF EXPRESSIONS
WITHIN SOME UTTERANCE TO REFER TO
SOME PORTION OF THE DISCOURSE THAT
CONTAINS THAT UTTERANCE (INCLUDING
THE UTTERANCE ITSELF.
(LEVINSON, 1983: 85)
27. Time discourse-deictic
It seems natural that time-deictic words can be used to refer to portions of the discourse:
Examples:
Last week
Next Thursday
Last paragraph
In the next Chapter
28. Demonstrative “This” and “That”
“This” can be used to refers to a forthcoming portion of the discourse.
i.g : I bet you haven’t heard this story
“That” to a preceding portion
i.g : That was the funniest story I’ve never heard
Place discourse-deictic
29. 5. SOCIAL DEIXIS
Social Deixis concerns the encoding of social distinctions that are relative to participant-roles,
particularly aspects of the social relationship holding between speaker and addressee(s) or
speaker and some referent. (Levinson, 1983: 63)
30. There are two basic kinds of socially
deictic information:
RELATIONAL
ABSOLUTE
31. RELATIONAL; The relations that typically
expressed:
Speaker and referent (e.g. referent honorifics)
Speaker and addressee (e.g. addressee honorifics)
Speaker and bystander (e.g. bystander or audience honorifics)
Speaker and setting (e.g. formality levels)
32. ABSOLUTE socially deictic information:
Authorized speaker:
Thai:
- ‘khrab’ a polite participle that can only be used by male speakers.
- ‘kha’ a polite participle that can only be used by female speakers
Authorized recipient:
Title Address: Your Honour, Mr. President