Deciding on a New LMS:An Inclusive RFP and Decision Making ProcessRhonda D. Blackburn, PhDC. Christine Salmon, PhDUniversity of Texas at Dallas
What are we going to do?Who we areWhy RFPProcessTimelineResultsOutcomes and Issues
Who we areUniversity of Texas at DallasApproximately 15,000 students and 800 facultyFour online programs
Why Conduct An RFP?Blackboard Vista end of lifeBuy-in from faculty and studentsTwo systems on campusGo with the best solution for our campus
Our ProcessLMS CommitteeInstructional Technology surveyFocus groupsRequest for ProposalReview submissionsBring top three companies to campusDecide on the new LMS
TimelineSummer 2010Sent out surveyFall 2010 Reviewed surveyConducted focus groupsStarted writing RFP
Timeline continuedSpring 2011Finished RFP, sent it out (March 7)Deadline for proposals (April 4)Develop rubric to evaluate vendorsBring in top three vendors, have faculty and students involvedDecide on new LMS (hosted or self-hosted?)
Timeline continuedSummer 2011Begin backend implementation and integration with PeopleSoftBegin building documentationFall 2011Continue backend implementation and integration with PeopleSoftContinue documentation
Timeline continuedSpring 2012Complete backend implementation and integration with PeopleSoftComplete documentationBegin training faculty who will use it in SummerBegin migrating content from old LMSSummer 2012Pilot new LMS, run simultaneously with old LMSContinue trainingContinue migrating content from old LMS
Timeline continuedFall 2012Add more faculty to the summer pilot groupContinue to run simultaneously with old LMSContinue trainingContinue migrating content from old LMSSpring 2013Any faculty who want to use new LMS canContinue to run simultaneously with old LMSContinue trainingContinue migrating content from old LMS
Timeline continuedSummer 2013Everyone is on new system and old system is used only as archive, no one is on old LMSMigrate any additional content from old LMS
At large inputInstructional Technology SurveyFocus groups11 focus groups4 faculty (1 online)4 student (1 online)1 instructional designer1 back-end1 accessibility
Instructional tech SurveyDesire for more online coursesSingle sign-onEasy navigationReliability and stabilityPrompt support
Focus groups processDetermined number and target audiencesDeveloped guiding questionsDeveloped pre-focus group surveyConducted focus groups (audio recorded)Analyzed results from survey and discussion
Results – overallStudents
Lack of use by faculty
Few fully online courses – used as support
Concern with stabilityFacultyFaculty unaware of existing featuresFaculty trainingEasy migration to new system
Results UsabilityToolsAccessibilityOverall improvements
usabilityPowerful but for power usersLearning curve is more work than it’s worthCould look more modern, updated
toolsCommunicationCollaborationAssessmentLearning modulesCourse managementIntegrated toolsAdditional tools, functionality
Integrated toolsLibrary, library reserves (f)(s)Video server, YouTube, iTunesU (f)Google docs (f)Turnitin, Grademark (f)MuchLearning (calculus) (s)Skype (s)
Additional functionalityOnline document editing (f)Push notification for course updates (s)Notification system (missed exam, announcements, discussion, etc) (f)Easily embed videos (f)Web conferencing (s)Resume function on quizzes (s)Picture roster (s)Consistent look among courses (s)Wikis (f)
Overall improvementsLoginMobilePublicMigrationListingsmyCourses

Deciding on a New LMS-An Inclusive RFP and Decision-Making Process