Background for 2002 Regional
Water Facilities Master Plan
 Initiated in 1998
 Focus on implementing supply diversification
 Rapidly increasing demand
  • Treated water
  • Untreated water
  • Record agricultural deliveries

 Early phase of ESP
  • Need to integrate into regional system

 Forecast for continued economic and population growth
 Relatively stable water rates


                                                          2
2002 Regional Water Facilities
Master Plan - Outcomes
 Identified sources of future supply
 • QSA
 • Seawater Desalination
 Ensured sufficient capacity for conveyance and treatment
 Developed facility options to manage increasing demands
 • Carlsbad Desalination
 • Twin Oaks Water Treatment Plant
 • Timing of Pipeline 6

 Developed facilities to assure supply and system
  reliability goals were met
 • Carryover Storage Project
 • Mission Trails FRS II


                                                        3
2012 Regional Water Facilities
Situation Analysis
 Near term forecast of slower economic and population growth
  • Prolonged recovery from recession and modest growth

 External factors constraining demand
  • Water supply shortages
  • Conservation ethic
  • Retail water rate increases
  • 20% X 2020 conservation legislation

 Completed a 20 year period of intensive capital investment in
  regional infrastructure
 Focus on efficiency and cost containment
 Prioritize future capital investment


                                                              4
2012 Master Plan Update Goals
 Evaluate new demand trends through 2035
 Optimize existing investments in conveyance,
  storage and treatment
 Assure the reliability of untreated and treated water
  supply deliveries
 Assure “right-time” cost effective facility
  development
 • Prioritize based on need and benefit

 Incorporate asset management concepts


                                                      5
2012 Master Plan Update Goals
    Member
    Agency                   2010
    Facility                UWMP
     Plans
                2012
               Master
  2002          Plan           Asset
 Master        Update       Management
  Plan                       Program


                Remaining
                   CIP
                                         6
2012 Master Plan Update
Key Focus Areas
 Evaluate peak water demands on conveyance
 • Efficiently deliver untreated water to treatment plants and
   reservoirs
 • Reevaluate timing and need for Pipeline 6
 Optimize the use of regional and member agency
  treated water supply facilities
 • Integrated desal supplies into regional treated water system
 • Identify opportunities to expand the usage of TOVWTP
 • Optimize Water Authority operations with member agency treated
   water facilities


                                                                 7
2012 Master Plan Update
Key Focus Areas
 Develop a strategic long range plan for surface water
  storage
 • Complement member agency operations
 • Manage peak demands
 • Integrate carryover storage into system operations
 Evaluate renewable energy opportunities
 Evaluate timing, scope and need of remaining CIP
  projects
 • Prioritize CIP projects based on objective criteria
 • Incorporate changes into the FY 2014-FY 2015 CIP budget
                                                             8
2012 Master Plan Update
Member Agency Coordination
 Technical Advisory Committee
 • Periodic meetings to review key technical issues including:
    Service reliability goals and issues
    Infrastructure alternatives and screening criteria
 Regular Updates at Member Agency Manager monthly
  meetings
 Update Water Planning Committee on key milestones




                                                                 9
Consultant Selection Process
 Advertised the project in September
 Received consultant proposals on Oct. 20, 2010
 Held consultant interviews on Nov. 4, 2010
 • Multi-agency interview panel
 • City of San Diego, Vallecitos and Helix Water Districts

 Selected CH2M Hill and Black & Veatch team
 • Understanding of the key issues influencing regional water
   supply reliability
 • Experience and working relationship with member agencies




                                                                10
2012 Master Plan Update Schedule



                              Member         Water
                 Member       Agency       Planning                          CIP
 Start Work      Agency       Manager                    Draft Report                    Final Report
                                          Committee                     prioritization
               Coordination   Meetings                     January                        December
January 2011                             Status Report
                Start TAC                                   2012         Early 2012         2012
                              Regular    Summer/Fall
                Early 2011
                              updates        2011




                                                                                              11
Staff recommendation
1. Award a professional services contract to CH2M
   Hill to provide planning services to prepare the
   2012 Regional Water Facilities Optimization and
   Master Plan Update for a not-to-exceed amount of
   $1,863,000.

2. Add $1,200,000 to the 2012 Regional Water
   Facilities Optimization and Master Plan Update
   budget.


                                                      12

December 9, 2010

  • 2.
    Background for 2002Regional Water Facilities Master Plan  Initiated in 1998  Focus on implementing supply diversification  Rapidly increasing demand • Treated water • Untreated water • Record agricultural deliveries  Early phase of ESP • Need to integrate into regional system  Forecast for continued economic and population growth  Relatively stable water rates 2
  • 3.
    2002 Regional WaterFacilities Master Plan - Outcomes  Identified sources of future supply • QSA • Seawater Desalination  Ensured sufficient capacity for conveyance and treatment  Developed facility options to manage increasing demands • Carlsbad Desalination • Twin Oaks Water Treatment Plant • Timing of Pipeline 6  Developed facilities to assure supply and system reliability goals were met • Carryover Storage Project • Mission Trails FRS II 3
  • 4.
    2012 Regional WaterFacilities Situation Analysis  Near term forecast of slower economic and population growth • Prolonged recovery from recession and modest growth  External factors constraining demand • Water supply shortages • Conservation ethic • Retail water rate increases • 20% X 2020 conservation legislation  Completed a 20 year period of intensive capital investment in regional infrastructure  Focus on efficiency and cost containment  Prioritize future capital investment 4
  • 5.
    2012 Master PlanUpdate Goals  Evaluate new demand trends through 2035  Optimize existing investments in conveyance, storage and treatment  Assure the reliability of untreated and treated water supply deliveries  Assure “right-time” cost effective facility development • Prioritize based on need and benefit  Incorporate asset management concepts 5
  • 6.
    2012 Master PlanUpdate Goals Member Agency 2010 Facility UWMP Plans 2012 Master 2002 Plan Asset Master Update Management Plan Program Remaining CIP 6
  • 7.
    2012 Master PlanUpdate Key Focus Areas  Evaluate peak water demands on conveyance • Efficiently deliver untreated water to treatment plants and reservoirs • Reevaluate timing and need for Pipeline 6  Optimize the use of regional and member agency treated water supply facilities • Integrated desal supplies into regional treated water system • Identify opportunities to expand the usage of TOVWTP • Optimize Water Authority operations with member agency treated water facilities 7
  • 8.
    2012 Master PlanUpdate Key Focus Areas  Develop a strategic long range plan for surface water storage • Complement member agency operations • Manage peak demands • Integrate carryover storage into system operations  Evaluate renewable energy opportunities  Evaluate timing, scope and need of remaining CIP projects • Prioritize CIP projects based on objective criteria • Incorporate changes into the FY 2014-FY 2015 CIP budget 8
  • 9.
    2012 Master PlanUpdate Member Agency Coordination  Technical Advisory Committee • Periodic meetings to review key technical issues including:  Service reliability goals and issues  Infrastructure alternatives and screening criteria  Regular Updates at Member Agency Manager monthly meetings  Update Water Planning Committee on key milestones 9
  • 10.
    Consultant Selection Process Advertised the project in September  Received consultant proposals on Oct. 20, 2010  Held consultant interviews on Nov. 4, 2010 • Multi-agency interview panel • City of San Diego, Vallecitos and Helix Water Districts  Selected CH2M Hill and Black & Veatch team • Understanding of the key issues influencing regional water supply reliability • Experience and working relationship with member agencies 10
  • 11.
    2012 Master PlanUpdate Schedule Member Water Member Agency Planning CIP Start Work Agency Manager Draft Report Final Report Committee prioritization Coordination Meetings January December January 2011 Status Report Start TAC 2012 Early 2012 2012 Regular Summer/Fall Early 2011 updates 2011 11
  • 12.
    Staff recommendation 1. Awarda professional services contract to CH2M Hill to provide planning services to prepare the 2012 Regional Water Facilities Optimization and Master Plan Update for a not-to-exceed amount of $1,863,000. 2. Add $1,200,000 to the 2012 Regional Water Facilities Optimization and Master Plan Update budget. 12