INNOVATION
Points for consideration
Outcomes of Breakout
Hope to accomplish a several outcomes:
1.  Continue progress from the morning discussions
2.  Better understand innovation at university level
3.  Better understand the limitations
Ultimate Goal
Leave with a realistic view of what is possible and
what where to focus attention
WHERE DOES INNOVATION
COME FROM?
Research
Advantages
•  Part of the core mission of most of our universities
•  Great thinkers and innovators who have ability to devote time
•  Enthusiastic labor force of RAs, grad students, post-docs
•  Often have access to government funds
Challenges
•  Not good at getting new ideas "off the lab bench” (not trained to
bring solutions to market)
•  Theoretical research; rewards and incentives are towards
academic papers, not usable solutions
•  Completely different skill set to be an entrepreneur
•  Shrinking funding base from many governments
Academic training
Advantages
•  New ideas can be incorporated into coursework to challenge
students to think creatively in analytic sand problem solving
•  Hands-on experiential learning becoming more popular
•  Research for student projects can complement needs of
practitioners in the field
•  Can use the campus to testing new approaches, providing
insight, feedback and practical field testing
Challenges
•  Takes more time to prepare students to think creatively and
analytically to solve real world problems
•  Physical limitations to using the campus as a learning lab
Collaboration
Advantages
•  An area of growing importance for universities – especially
local and regional partnerships
•  Sharing operational strategies can provide new insights
•  More likely to take some risks when know there is a broader
support network with professional expertise and advice
•  Sum is greater than the whole
Challenges
•  Still have a "first mover" risk – the first to try a new technology
is the one that takes the majority of risk for failure.
•  Collaborative may wait for someone else to start.
•  Coordination is time consuming, and often considered outside
scope of regular duties.

Davis Bookhart: Innovation: points for consideration

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Outcomes of Breakout Hopeto accomplish a several outcomes: 1.  Continue progress from the morning discussions 2.  Better understand innovation at university level 3.  Better understand the limitations Ultimate Goal Leave with a realistic view of what is possible and what where to focus attention
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Research Advantages •  Part ofthe core mission of most of our universities •  Great thinkers and innovators who have ability to devote time •  Enthusiastic labor force of RAs, grad students, post-docs •  Often have access to government funds Challenges •  Not good at getting new ideas "off the lab bench” (not trained to bring solutions to market) •  Theoretical research; rewards and incentives are towards academic papers, not usable solutions •  Completely different skill set to be an entrepreneur •  Shrinking funding base from many governments
  • 5.
    Academic training Advantages •  Newideas can be incorporated into coursework to challenge students to think creatively in analytic sand problem solving •  Hands-on experiential learning becoming more popular •  Research for student projects can complement needs of practitioners in the field •  Can use the campus to testing new approaches, providing insight, feedback and practical field testing Challenges •  Takes more time to prepare students to think creatively and analytically to solve real world problems •  Physical limitations to using the campus as a learning lab
  • 6.
    Collaboration Advantages •  An areaof growing importance for universities – especially local and regional partnerships •  Sharing operational strategies can provide new insights •  More likely to take some risks when know there is a broader support network with professional expertise and advice •  Sum is greater than the whole Challenges •  Still have a "first mover" risk – the first to try a new technology is the one that takes the majority of risk for failure. •  Collaborative may wait for someone else to start. •  Coordination is time consuming, and often considered outside scope of regular duties.