Evidence based practice for dvt prophylaxis - power pointRafie1Davidov
The document discusses evidence-based research on DVT prophylaxis for hospitalized patients. It reviews 4 sources that found Lovenox to be more effective than compression stockings alone in preventing DVTs. The suggested innovation is developing individualized DVT prophylaxis plans for patients based on their risk factors. The implementation process outlines using Kotter's change model to get buy-in from nurses and doctors and establish the new protocol.
This document provides an overview of evidence-based medicine resources for pediatrics. It defines evidence-based medicine and discusses the importance of both clinical expertise and best external evidence. It then lists various computer systems, journals, and the Cochrane Library that can help find evidence. It explains how to formulate clinical questions using the PICO framework and identifies the best study designs to answer different types of clinical questions. An example clinical question is provided. Finally, it lists several websites that provide evidence-based care guidelines, journal reviews, and other pediatric EBM resources.
This document discusses how to design multisite research on hospital malnutrition and adverse clinical outcomes. It covers developing a good research question, including ensuring it is focused, novel, and fills an evidence gap. Characteristics of strong research questions are described, such as being clear, succinct, and phrased as a question. Sources of good questions are reviewing systematic reviews and having input from colleagues. Attendees are assigned to draft a one-sentence research question of their own interest using FINER criteria.
The document discusses the shift from an age of expertise to an age of evidence-based practice in prosthodontics. It outlines the steps of evidence-based practice, including formulating clinical questions, determining the appropriate level of evidence, searching for and critically appraising evidence, applying the evidence to patients, and evaluating outcomes. The goals are to enable recognition of the best scientific evidence in prosthodontics, consolidate information overload, scrutinize existing treatments, improve current and future treatments, encourage better clinical research and reporting, and advance the specialty.
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubricaPubrica
The case report guidelines were developed using a three-phase consensus process that included (1) literature research and interviews before the conference to produce items for the reporting criteria, (2) a face-to-face meeting to draught reporting guidelines and (3) post-meeting feedback, review, and pilot testing, followed by finalization of the case report guidelines.
Learn More : https://bit.ly/3HEzHbs
Reference: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/case-report-writing/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
Evidence based practice for dvt prophylaxis - power pointRafie1Davidov
The document discusses evidence-based research on DVT prophylaxis for hospitalized patients. It reviews 4 sources that found Lovenox to be more effective than compression stockings alone in preventing DVTs. The suggested innovation is developing individualized DVT prophylaxis plans for patients based on their risk factors. The implementation process outlines using Kotter's change model to get buy-in from nurses and doctors and establish the new protocol.
This document provides an overview of evidence-based medicine resources for pediatrics. It defines evidence-based medicine and discusses the importance of both clinical expertise and best external evidence. It then lists various computer systems, journals, and the Cochrane Library that can help find evidence. It explains how to formulate clinical questions using the PICO framework and identifies the best study designs to answer different types of clinical questions. An example clinical question is provided. Finally, it lists several websites that provide evidence-based care guidelines, journal reviews, and other pediatric EBM resources.
This document discusses how to design multisite research on hospital malnutrition and adverse clinical outcomes. It covers developing a good research question, including ensuring it is focused, novel, and fills an evidence gap. Characteristics of strong research questions are described, such as being clear, succinct, and phrased as a question. Sources of good questions are reviewing systematic reviews and having input from colleagues. Attendees are assigned to draft a one-sentence research question of their own interest using FINER criteria.
The document discusses the shift from an age of expertise to an age of evidence-based practice in prosthodontics. It outlines the steps of evidence-based practice, including formulating clinical questions, determining the appropriate level of evidence, searching for and critically appraising evidence, applying the evidence to patients, and evaluating outcomes. The goals are to enable recognition of the best scientific evidence in prosthodontics, consolidate information overload, scrutinize existing treatments, improve current and future treatments, encourage better clinical research and reporting, and advance the specialty.
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubricaPubrica
The case report guidelines were developed using a three-phase consensus process that included (1) literature research and interviews before the conference to produce items for the reporting criteria, (2) a face-to-face meeting to draught reporting guidelines and (3) post-meeting feedback, review, and pilot testing, followed by finalization of the case report guidelines.
Learn More : https://bit.ly/3HEzHbs
Reference: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/case-report-writing/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubricaPubrica
The document outlines the development of CARE (Case Report) guidelines for writing clinical case reports. It describes a three-phase consensus process used to develop reporting recommendations based on literature reviews, interviews, and feedback from medical experts. The guidelines provide a standardized structure for case reports to improve their clinical usefulness and ensure rigorous reporting.
The document discusses the importance of guidelines for accurately reporting scientific studies. Several guidelines are commonly used to ensure results are reported properly, including PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, CONSORT for randomized controlled trials, and STROBE for observational studies. Additional guidelines discussed are STARD for diagnostic accuracy studies, SPIRIT for clinical trial protocols, CARE for case reports, SRQR for qualitative research, SQUIRE for quality improvement studies, CHEERS for health economic evaluations, ARRIVE for animal research, and AGREE for practice guidelines. The purpose of these reporting guidelines is to promote transparency, accuracy, and easier assessment of research findings.
This document discusses critical appraisal methods for clinical studies. It outlines different types of studies from systematic reviews to case reports and their levels of evidence. Critical appraisal is important to ensure data validity, applicability, and evidence-based practice. However, research findings must be carefully evaluated to avoid inaccurate conclusions. Common misconceptions include thinking publication means a study is correct. Critical appraisal involves examining a study's question, methodology, results, and discussion to judge trustworthiness. Key considerations include whether a study addresses a focused question using valid methods and produces important and applicable results.
This document discusses PubMed Health and summarizing systematic reviews for consumers. It provides context on PubMed Health transitioning to focus on clinical effectiveness research and consumer summaries of reviews. The document outlines what makes a good consumer summary, including being in plain language, faithful to the review findings, addressing certainty of evidence, and having a readable style. It analyzes the content and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries, finding room for improvement. PubMed Health is changing its focus to include more systematic reviews and consumer summaries of reviews from organizations like Cochrane and AHRQ.
This document discusses the importance of real-world evidence in medicine. Real-world evidence provides information about therapeutic agents from clinical practice that complements data from randomized controlled trials. Sources of real-world evidence include electronic medical records, billing databases, product registries, and disease registries. Real-world evidence is useful for generalizing trial findings to broader patient populations, outcomes research, and safety surveillance outside of traditional clinical trials. However, real-world evidence studies also have limitations like potential data quality issues and difficulty controlling for biases compared to randomized trials.
The pathology group aims to stimulate technology in pathology through scientific excellence. It publishes clinical and experimental pathology journals and focuses on plant pathology and microbiology. It also organizes an international conference on pathology to provide a forum for researchers to share cutting-edge research, solutions, and build relationships to advance early-stage research to clinical treatments.
This document discusses the need for a paradigm shift in public understanding of medical research and development (R&D) to better meet patient needs. It notes that current "success stories" only help small numbers of patients, and that patients urgently need therapeutic innovation. It argues that innovation in areas like cancer, rare diseases, clinical trial design, and personalized medicine requires new approaches in R&D. It also emphasizes the important role patient organizations can play by providing insights into patient experiences and priorities to help drive research. Finally, it introduces the European Patients' Academy as an initiative aiming to train patient advocates and foster collaborative efforts to make drug development more effective.
This document provides an overview of cohort studies, including their basic approach, history, strengths and challenges. Cohort studies follow groups of individuals over time to study how exposures affect outcomes. They can follow either a single group or multiple exposure groups. Exposures and outcomes are recorded longitudinally. Cohort studies allow for analysis of how time-varying exposures relate to disease occurrence and provide a comprehensive view of exposure-disease dynamics. However, accurately characterizing exposures over long periods can be complex.
❤[PDF]✔download⚡ Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trial...flatteuseasbyuuy
Group sequential methods answer the needs of clinical trial monitoring committees who must assess the data available at an interim analysis. These interim results may provide grounds for terminating the studyeffectively reducing costsor may benefit the general patient population by allowing early dissemination of its findings. Group sequential methods provide a means to balance the ethical and financial advantages of stopping a study early against the risk of an incorrect conclusion.Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials describes group sequential stopping rules designed to reduce average study length and control Type I and II error probabilities. The authors present onesided and twosided tests introduce several families of group sequential tests and explain how to choose the most appropriate test and interim analysis schedule. Their topics include placebocontrolle
The document provides tips for searching the literature to answer clinical questions. It recommends identifying the problem, defining a structured question, and finding the best evidence. It discusses using databases like CRD, which contains reviews from DARE, NHS EED and HTA. The search process involves searching for the patient/pathology concept first using MeSH terms, then searching for the therapy concept. Combining concepts with Boolean operators can help find the most relevant evidence.
Why research is important a guide for patients revised laura londraMichael Donohue
Patient's guide to Infertility Research. Dr. Laura Londra IVF and Fertility Specialist at Ohio Reproductive Medicine in Columbus Ohio, explains how to look up and interpret a Reproductive Endocrinologists published research.
Medical lab scientists the ‘hidden profession’ that saves livesPauleenCinco
Medical lab scientists play a crucial but often unseen role in healthcare. As detectives of the medical field, they analyze biological samples to detect diseases and provide insights that guide doctors' treatment decisions. Their work identifying positive COVID-19 cases helped doctors begin early treatment and reduce spread. While advances in technology have improved turnaround for test results, the important role medical lab scientists play remains underappreciated by the public who rarely see them. Their efforts in testing samples and analyzing results are key to patient care and outcomes.
A researcher’s experience of the benefits of open access BioMedCentral
The document discusses the benefits of open access publishing for researchers. Open access increases the visibility and availability of a researcher's work, allows them to see who else is working in their research area, and strengthens potential collaborations. It provides a transparent peer review system, more timely publication, career advancement through increased high-quality publications, invitations to research partnerships and journal editorships. Open access also provides no publication fees and helps fulfill grant requirements.
Outcomes research seeks to understand the end results of healthcare practices and interventions in order to improve quality of care. It studies the effects of management on individuals and populations. Key aspects measured include mortality, physiological measures, clinical events, patient experiences, and functional status. However, outcomes research requires significant time and funding to conduct rigorous methodology, which can be difficult to sustain over the long term. As healthcare is constantly evolving, outcomes research is an ongoing process to discover solutions to problems.
The document outlines Dr. Nuaman Ahmad Danawar's research program, which includes three main components: basics of medical research and evidence-based medicine, methods of writing medical research papers, and fundamentals of academic writing. It then discusses key aspects of medical research, such as primary vs. secondary research, different types of research studies including observational and interventional studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, clinical guidelines, and the standard IMRAD format for research papers. The document provides an overview of Dr. Danawar's qualifications and databases commonly used for medical research.
This document discusses guidelines for reporting different types of clinical studies in Ayurveda. It describes three types of research questions: descriptive, associational, and causal. It also distinguishes between observational and experimental studies. Observational studies are further divided into descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional, longitudinal, retrospective, and prospective studies. Case-control and cohort studies are described as specific types of observational studies. Experimental or intervention studies involve testing the effect of an intervention and can be randomized or non-randomized. The CONSORT guidelines are presented for reporting randomized controlled trials. Guidelines for reporting observational studies include the STROBE statement and checklist. CARE guidelines are also discussed for reporting case reports and case series.
Articulo que revisa la metodologia de diseños Observacionales, incluye una lista de verificacion de los principales aspectos de un diseño observacional. Publicado en 2007
This document provides explanations and guidance for authors on how to improve reporting of observational studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. The STROBE checklist consists of 22 items covering title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. The document discusses each item of the checklist, providing published examples and references to methodological literature to enhance understanding and use of STROBE. The goal is to ensure clear and transparent reporting of observational studies.
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubricaPubrica
The document outlines the development of CARE (Case Report) guidelines for writing clinical case reports. It describes a three-phase consensus process used to develop reporting recommendations based on literature reviews, interviews, and feedback from medical experts. The guidelines provide a standardized structure for case reports to improve their clinical usefulness and ensure rigorous reporting.
The document discusses the importance of guidelines for accurately reporting scientific studies. Several guidelines are commonly used to ensure results are reported properly, including PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, CONSORT for randomized controlled trials, and STROBE for observational studies. Additional guidelines discussed are STARD for diagnostic accuracy studies, SPIRIT for clinical trial protocols, CARE for case reports, SRQR for qualitative research, SQUIRE for quality improvement studies, CHEERS for health economic evaluations, ARRIVE for animal research, and AGREE for practice guidelines. The purpose of these reporting guidelines is to promote transparency, accuracy, and easier assessment of research findings.
This document discusses critical appraisal methods for clinical studies. It outlines different types of studies from systematic reviews to case reports and their levels of evidence. Critical appraisal is important to ensure data validity, applicability, and evidence-based practice. However, research findings must be carefully evaluated to avoid inaccurate conclusions. Common misconceptions include thinking publication means a study is correct. Critical appraisal involves examining a study's question, methodology, results, and discussion to judge trustworthiness. Key considerations include whether a study addresses a focused question using valid methods and produces important and applicable results.
This document discusses PubMed Health and summarizing systematic reviews for consumers. It provides context on PubMed Health transitioning to focus on clinical effectiveness research and consumer summaries of reviews. The document outlines what makes a good consumer summary, including being in plain language, faithful to the review findings, addressing certainty of evidence, and having a readable style. It analyzes the content and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries, finding room for improvement. PubMed Health is changing its focus to include more systematic reviews and consumer summaries of reviews from organizations like Cochrane and AHRQ.
This document discusses the importance of real-world evidence in medicine. Real-world evidence provides information about therapeutic agents from clinical practice that complements data from randomized controlled trials. Sources of real-world evidence include electronic medical records, billing databases, product registries, and disease registries. Real-world evidence is useful for generalizing trial findings to broader patient populations, outcomes research, and safety surveillance outside of traditional clinical trials. However, real-world evidence studies also have limitations like potential data quality issues and difficulty controlling for biases compared to randomized trials.
The pathology group aims to stimulate technology in pathology through scientific excellence. It publishes clinical and experimental pathology journals and focuses on plant pathology and microbiology. It also organizes an international conference on pathology to provide a forum for researchers to share cutting-edge research, solutions, and build relationships to advance early-stage research to clinical treatments.
This document discusses the need for a paradigm shift in public understanding of medical research and development (R&D) to better meet patient needs. It notes that current "success stories" only help small numbers of patients, and that patients urgently need therapeutic innovation. It argues that innovation in areas like cancer, rare diseases, clinical trial design, and personalized medicine requires new approaches in R&D. It also emphasizes the important role patient organizations can play by providing insights into patient experiences and priorities to help drive research. Finally, it introduces the European Patients' Academy as an initiative aiming to train patient advocates and foster collaborative efforts to make drug development more effective.
This document provides an overview of cohort studies, including their basic approach, history, strengths and challenges. Cohort studies follow groups of individuals over time to study how exposures affect outcomes. They can follow either a single group or multiple exposure groups. Exposures and outcomes are recorded longitudinally. Cohort studies allow for analysis of how time-varying exposures relate to disease occurrence and provide a comprehensive view of exposure-disease dynamics. However, accurately characterizing exposures over long periods can be complex.
❤[PDF]✔download⚡ Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trial...flatteuseasbyuuy
Group sequential methods answer the needs of clinical trial monitoring committees who must assess the data available at an interim analysis. These interim results may provide grounds for terminating the studyeffectively reducing costsor may benefit the general patient population by allowing early dissemination of its findings. Group sequential methods provide a means to balance the ethical and financial advantages of stopping a study early against the risk of an incorrect conclusion.Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials describes group sequential stopping rules designed to reduce average study length and control Type I and II error probabilities. The authors present onesided and twosided tests introduce several families of group sequential tests and explain how to choose the most appropriate test and interim analysis schedule. Their topics include placebocontrolle
The document provides tips for searching the literature to answer clinical questions. It recommends identifying the problem, defining a structured question, and finding the best evidence. It discusses using databases like CRD, which contains reviews from DARE, NHS EED and HTA. The search process involves searching for the patient/pathology concept first using MeSH terms, then searching for the therapy concept. Combining concepts with Boolean operators can help find the most relevant evidence.
Why research is important a guide for patients revised laura londraMichael Donohue
Patient's guide to Infertility Research. Dr. Laura Londra IVF and Fertility Specialist at Ohio Reproductive Medicine in Columbus Ohio, explains how to look up and interpret a Reproductive Endocrinologists published research.
Medical lab scientists the ‘hidden profession’ that saves livesPauleenCinco
Medical lab scientists play a crucial but often unseen role in healthcare. As detectives of the medical field, they analyze biological samples to detect diseases and provide insights that guide doctors' treatment decisions. Their work identifying positive COVID-19 cases helped doctors begin early treatment and reduce spread. While advances in technology have improved turnaround for test results, the important role medical lab scientists play remains underappreciated by the public who rarely see them. Their efforts in testing samples and analyzing results are key to patient care and outcomes.
A researcher’s experience of the benefits of open access BioMedCentral
The document discusses the benefits of open access publishing for researchers. Open access increases the visibility and availability of a researcher's work, allows them to see who else is working in their research area, and strengthens potential collaborations. It provides a transparent peer review system, more timely publication, career advancement through increased high-quality publications, invitations to research partnerships and journal editorships. Open access also provides no publication fees and helps fulfill grant requirements.
Outcomes research seeks to understand the end results of healthcare practices and interventions in order to improve quality of care. It studies the effects of management on individuals and populations. Key aspects measured include mortality, physiological measures, clinical events, patient experiences, and functional status. However, outcomes research requires significant time and funding to conduct rigorous methodology, which can be difficult to sustain over the long term. As healthcare is constantly evolving, outcomes research is an ongoing process to discover solutions to problems.
The document outlines Dr. Nuaman Ahmad Danawar's research program, which includes three main components: basics of medical research and evidence-based medicine, methods of writing medical research papers, and fundamentals of academic writing. It then discusses key aspects of medical research, such as primary vs. secondary research, different types of research studies including observational and interventional studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, clinical guidelines, and the standard IMRAD format for research papers. The document provides an overview of Dr. Danawar's qualifications and databases commonly used for medical research.
This document discusses guidelines for reporting different types of clinical studies in Ayurveda. It describes three types of research questions: descriptive, associational, and causal. It also distinguishes between observational and experimental studies. Observational studies are further divided into descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional, longitudinal, retrospective, and prospective studies. Case-control and cohort studies are described as specific types of observational studies. Experimental or intervention studies involve testing the effect of an intervention and can be randomized or non-randomized. The CONSORT guidelines are presented for reporting randomized controlled trials. Guidelines for reporting observational studies include the STROBE statement and checklist. CARE guidelines are also discussed for reporting case reports and case series.
Articulo que revisa la metodologia de diseños Observacionales, incluye una lista de verificacion de los principales aspectos de un diseño observacional. Publicado en 2007
This document provides explanations and guidance for authors on how to improve reporting of observational studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. The STROBE checklist consists of 22 items covering title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. The document discusses each item of the checklist, providing published examples and references to methodological literature to enhance understanding and use of STROBE. The goal is to ensure clear and transparent reporting of observational studies.
Impact of clinical research as a confounder for medical school rankingsJens Peter Andersen
This document discusses the impact of clinical research as a confounder for medical school rankings. It notes that basic and pre-clinical research is generally conducted at universities, while clinical research occurs at hospitals. This means that medical school rankings may be misleading if they do not properly account for the influence of affiliated hospital research. The document advocates for more transparency in rankings regarding whether hospitals are included and what types of research are driving impacts. It provides examples comparing the research profiles of universities and affiliated hospitals. The implications are that rankings need more details on their methodology to distinguish between different types of medical research.
1. Research is a systematic investigation to increase knowledge. It is needed locally to account for ethnic, cultural, economic factors.
2. Research methodology involves designing and conducting research, while EBM uses existing research evidence along with clinical expertise and patient preferences.
3. The main types of research are quantitative (descriptive, analytical) and qualitative. Descriptive studies observe phenomena while analytical studies assess relationships.
This document discusses different types of research studies, including observational studies like case-control studies, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies as well as experimental studies like clinical trials. It provides details on the design, strengths, and limitations of each type of study. Case-control studies look back in time to compare exposures between cases and controls, while cohort studies follow groups over time to examine exposure-outcome relationships. Cross-sectional studies measure exposure and outcome at the same time point. Clinical trials experimentally assign interventions to evaluate effects on outcomes. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses statistically synthesize evidence from multiple studies.
Evidence based medicine in mass gathering public health and emergency medicin...Pubrica
The articles were gathered into their subject matter category, as resolute by the WHO. The types comprised of:
1. Epidemiology
2. Event Operations
3. Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Response
4. Point of Entry Health……
Continue Reading : https://bit.ly/3I9NmIz
Our Services : https://pubrica.com/services/physician-writing-services/clinical-literature-review-for-an-evidence-based-medicine/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
Evidence based medicine in mass gathering public health and emergency medicin...Pubrica
The articles were gathered into their subject matter category, as resolute by the WHO. The types comprised of:
1. Epidemiology
2. Event Operations
3. Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Response
4. Point of Entry Health……
Continue Reading : https://bit.ly/3I9NmIz
Our Services : https://pubrica.com/services/physician-writing-services/clinical-literature-review-for-an-evidence-based-medicine/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
Advancing The Prevention And Cure Of Cancerfondas vakalis
The document discusses the shared missions and collaborations between the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to advance cancer research and reduce the burden of cancer. It outlines their joint efforts in conferences, workshops, and think tanks. It also summarizes advances in cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment that have contributed to reduced cancer mortality rates in recent years but challenges remain.
This document provides an overview of different study designs used in clinical research. It describes descriptive studies like case reports, case series, and cross-sectional studies which aim to describe characteristics of populations. Analytical studies like case-control and cohort studies assess associations between exposures and outcomes. Experimental studies like randomized clinical trials allocate exposures to subjects. Biases like selection bias, information bias, and confounding are discussed. An example of a cross-sectional study design assessing hypertension prevalence is provided.
Professor Martin Wiseman’s presentation, The Continuous Update Project: Introduction to the Project, at the African Organisation for Research & Training in Cancer (AORTIC) conference, 18-22 November 2015, Marrakech, Morocco.
A presentation by Carolina Samuelsson at the 2017 meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Anaestesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.
All available content from SSAI2017: https://scanfoam.org/ssai2017/
Delivered in collaboration between scanFOAM, SSAI & SFAI.
This document provides an overview of the research process. It defines research and describes the main types as qualitative and quantitative. The key steps in designing and conducting research are outlined, including formulating the research question, selecting an appropriate design, defining variables, sampling, data collection and analysis, and reporting findings. Guidelines for selecting a research topic and writing objectives are also presented. Different study designs - descriptive, analytical, experimental and observational - are explained.
This document provides guidelines for conducting a journal club, including selecting an article, evaluating it, and presenting it. A journal club is an important academic activity where scholars discuss and critically analyze scientific research articles. The goals are to improve research skills, stay up to date on the latest findings, and develop critical appraisal abilities. When presenting an article, the presentation should cover key elements like the title, authors, journal, abstract, study design, results, discussion, and conclusions. The journal club aims to encourage evidence-based learning and debate.
This document summarizes a presentation on translational research given to the Wisconsin Health Science Librarians Association. It defines translational research as research that facilitates moving findings from basic science into practical applications to improve human health. It discusses how clinical and translational research centers (CTSAs) were established by the NIH to help re-engineer the clinical research enterprise and speed the translation of research results. CTSAs work to build infrastructure, support innovative research, and provide education and training across 60 centers nationally.
Professor Martin Wiseman presentation on The Continuous Update Project: Introduction to the Project at FENS European Nutrition Conference, 20-23 October 2015 Berlin (Germany).
This document discusses descriptive and cross-sectional studies. It outlines the steps in the scientific method and differentiates between observational and experimental studies. Descriptive studies examine health status based on routine data to describe disease patterns without testing hypotheses. Cross-sectional studies can test hypotheses by including study and control groups to examine prevalence and potential causative factors. The document discusses the types, uses, advantages, and disadvantages of descriptive and cross-sectional studies, and outlines the steps to carry out a cross-sectional study.
The document discusses evidence-based periodontology. It defines evidence-based practice and outlines the stages in evidence-based practice, including framing clinical questions and searching for evidence through systematic reviews. Critical appraisal of evidence is important to determine internal and external validity. The best available evidence was searched for various periodontal therapies and procedures, finding that mechanical debridement remains the foundation treatment, while some adjunctive therapies provide modest benefits. A review found reduced pocket depth reduction in smokers compared to non-smokers following nonsurgical periodontal therapy.
The document discusses collaboration in biobanking to support pharmaceutical R&D activities. It notes that R&D costs are high and innovation is needed. Biobanks can help by providing samples for research into diseases. The document describes AstraZeneca's global biobank network and examples of collaborations on disease-specific biobanks for conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and COPD. It argues that more collaboration is needed through standards, infrastructure, addressing ethical issues, and meeting customer needs to sustain R&D activities.
Similar to The STROBE Initiative (Sven Sandin) (20)
This document discusses various international exchanges and collaborations between students and staff at a university. It mentions students from the graduating class of 2011, current students on exchange in Copenhagen and Munich, and a past event at Fjellheisen in 2015 where students and staff socialized. It encourages applying for admission by April 15th.
The document announces various deadlines and events related to a public health program. It encourages students to apply for admission by April 15th and lists exchange opportunities in Munich, Tbilisi, and Copenhagen for 2016. It also mentions a Christmas lunch for graduating class of 2011 and a trip to Fjellheisen by MPH students and staff in 2015.
The document announces a Christmas lunch for graduating students of 2011 from the MPH program. It also mentions MPH students going on exchange to Copenhagen in 2016 and a photo of MPH students and staff at Fjellheisen in 2015. Finally, it advertises applying for exchange programs in Munich and Tbilisi by April 15th.
This document contains the program for the EPINOR Summer School taking place from June 2-6, 2014 in Tromsø, Norway. The program includes lectures and workshops on scientific writing led by Janet Holmen and Sven Sandin. It also includes social activities such as a boat trip and kayaking to showcase the natural beauty of Tromsø. The welcome message encourages participants to actively engage in discussions and activities to help build the foundation for an ongoing EPINOR tradition. Brief biographies are provided for the lecturers Janet Holmen, Sven Sandin, and Carel Jacobs. The remainder of the document lists abstracts from participants on their research topics.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Communicating effectively and consistently with students can help them feel at ease during their learning experience and provide the instructor with a communication trail to track the course's progress. This workshop will take you through constructing an engaging course container to facilitate effective communication.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
The STROBE Initiative (Sven Sandin)
1. The STROBE Initiative
Sven Sandin,
Dpt of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
http://ki.se/en/people/svesan
2. The STROBE initiative
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in
Epidemiology
Aims and use of STROBE
Incomplete and inadequate reporting of research
hampers the assessment of the strengths and
weaknesses of the studies reported in the medical
literature. Readers need to know what was planned
(and what was not), what was done, what was found,
and what the results mean. Recommendations on the
reporting of studies that are endorsed by leading
medical journals can improve the quality of reporting.